ContraceptionNCT03559634
Contraception Initiation Feasibility in the Pediatric ED
A study testing Intervention Group in people with Contraception and Contraception Behavior, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Many female adolescents using the pediatric emergency department (ED) are at higher risk for unintended pregnancy. This is a significant public health issue and hormonal contraception is the mainstay of prevention. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 15 to 21 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Contraception, Contraception Behavior
- What is being tested?
- Intervention Group
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 55 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 20 May 2019to 30 Jan 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 15 to 21 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Female patients, 15-21 years old that present to the SLCH pediatric ED
- Report history of vaginal sex on the ED routine screening questionnaire
- Not currently using hormonal contraception
Who cannot join
- Pregnant
- Currently using hormonal contraception
- Foster care
- Non-English speaking
- Chief complaint of psychiatric concern, physical abuse or sexual abuse
- Triage acuity level 1 or 2 as they are likely to be too ill to participate
Show all 9Show fewer
- Those with history of stroke, venous thromboembolism, actively being treated for cancer, or who have an organ transplant
- Too ill to participate as determined by the pediatric ED health care provider (attending physician or advanced practice nurse)
- Already participated in the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Washington Univeristy at St Louis
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
About this study
Official title: Feasibility Trial of Hormonal Contraceptive Initiation Program in the Pediatric Emergency Department
Many female adolescents using the pediatric emergency department (ED) are at higher risk for unintended pregnancy. This is a significant public health issue and hormonal contraception is the mainstay of prevention. Many barriers to hormonal contraception exist and other studies have demonstrated that referral from the ED for hormonal contraception leads to poor follow up.
This study will be a pilot study to assess the feasibility of initiating hormonal contraception in the pediatric ED.
Read the detailed description
This study will assess the feasibility of initiating hormonal contraception in the pediatric ED. Currently, all 15-21-year-old patients receiving care in our ED are asked to complete an adolescent heath questionnaire to identify risk-factors for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Sexually active female patients who indicate on this questionnaire they are not currently using hormonal contraception will be eligible for participation in this study.
Potential participants will be screened using the EMR and eligible patients will be approached. Consent will be obtained from adults directly and from a parent or guardian for minors that have one present. For minors that present without a parent or guardian, assent only with be obtained from the minor. Participants will be randomized into two groups, an intervention group and a control group. Participants in both groups will be given tablet computer and, through a software application on the tablet, answer questions electronically about their background, medical history, and contraceptive preferences. They will then be shown a video that provides an overview of hormonal contraceptive options. Depending on the participants medical history and contraceptive preferences, they may be offered more in-depth educational videos about specific types of hormonal contraception for which they are eligible (e.g. pill, transdermal patch, intravaginal ring, injection, and implant).
Once they have completed watching the videos, participants in the intervention group will have the option of initiating one of the offered forms of birth control during the ED visit. They will only be offered medications considered low risk and for which they do not have any medical contraindications. Urine pregnancy testing will be done before any method is given. They will be able to start any contraceptive method from among those offered after their screening. Participants in the control group will be offered outpatient referral to initiate contraception, the current standard of care in our ED. All patients in both arms of the study will be given referral/follow up options for further contraceptive care.
All participants in this study will then be followed up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months to determine continuation of contraception practices, follow up practices, satisfaction, and pregnancy rates.
- Conditions
- Contraception, Contraception Behavior
- Being tested
- Intervention Group, Control Group
- Medical subject headings
- Contraception Behavior
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Intervention GroupDiagnostic test
The electronic application will collect screening health information and contraceptive preferences about the participant. Then, using branch logic, decide which contraceptive options the participant would qualify for based on health history answers. Contraceptive choices being offered include the contraceptive implant, injection, pill, patch, or ring. They will then be able to watch videos about methods they are eligible for. The participant can then decide if they would like to start a medication they qualify for in the ED.
Control GroupOther
The electronic application will collect screening health information and contraceptive preferences about the participant. Then, using branch logic, decide which contraceptive options the participant would qualify for based on health history answers. This includes the contraceptive implant, injection, pill, patch, or ring. They will then be able to watch videos about methods they are eligible for. Participants will then be given follow up information on outpatient locations where they can receive these contraceptive methods.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Using an electronic application, participants answer survey questions about their sexual history, medical history, and contraceptive preferences. They will watch a video that overviews the types of hormonal contraception. Then, based on survey answers, they will be able to watch more in-depth educational videos on methods that they qualify for. Participants will only be offered methods that are considered low risk and without any contraindication based upon responses to survey screening. This may include, contraceptive implant, medroxyprogesterone acetate injection, microgestin pills, xulane patch, or intravaginal ring. Participants will then be given the opportunity to initiate contraception in the ED. All participants will be referred for follow up outpatient health services. Subjects who have medical contraindications to certain contraceptive medications will be given a standardized handout that explains why they were not eligible for the medication(s) while in the ED. Receives: Diagnostic Test: Intervention Group |
| Control Group | Other | Using an electronic application, participants answer survey questions about their background, sexual history, medical history, and contraceptive preferences. They will watch a video that overviews the types of hormonal contraception with brief pros and cons of each method. Then, based on participants medical history and contraceptive preferences they will be able to watch more in-depth counseling and educational videos on contraceptive methods that they qualify for. After these videos they will be given information on where they will be able to follow up to receive these contraceptive methods if they wish to start a method. Subjects who have medical contraindications to certain hormonal contraceptive medications will be given a standardized handout that explains why they were not eligible for the medication(s), should this come up in future discussions with their providers. Receives: Other: Control Group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Initiation of contraception in the ED using the electronic application
The proportion of enrolled patients that initiate contraception when offered same-day (intervention arm) compared to those that initiate contraception at follow up (the control arm) at 3 months.
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (6)
Delivery process related outcomes #1
Total length of time of the intervention beginning after consent and ending with provision of contraception, contraceptive script, or declining initiation of contraception.
Measured: At initial encounter.
Delivery process related outcomes #2
Subject length of stay defined by arrival time to disposition (admit or discharge) from ED.
Measured: At initial encounter.
Delivery process related outcomes #3
Patient experience and satisfaction survey both directly after program and at follow up at 3, 6, and 12 months. Likert 5 point scale will be used with the following rating options strongly agree, agree, no opinion, disagree, or strongly disagree. Data will be stored in original language and in a numerical scale, with a range of 1 to 5 with 5 for the question being better experience/satisfaction. Following completion of enrollment, all data will be aggregated and analyzed to determine mean and standard deviation of all questions.
Measured: At initial encounter and at follow up at 3, 6, and 12 months.
Delivery process related outcomes #4
Providers (doctors and nurses) experience and satisfaction survey for initial visit in ED. Likert 5 point scale will be used with the following rating options strongly agree, agree, no opinion, disagree, or strongly disagree. Data will be stored in original language and in a numerical scale, with a range of 1 to 5 with 5 for the question being better experience/satisfaction. Following completion of enrollment, all data will be aggregated and analyzed to determine mean and standard deviation of all questions.
Measured: At initial encounter.
Contraceptive continuation
Percentage of participants that are using hormonal contraception in the intervention group as compared to the control group at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months.
Measured: At 3,6, and 12 months.
Pregnancy rates
The number of participants that become pregnant within 12 months in the intervention group verses the control group.
Measured: 12 months.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Jun 2018
- Study start20 May 2019
- Primary completion26 Jan 2021
- Study completion30 Jan 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ContraceptionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Washington University School of MedicineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Feasibility trial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 55 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Washington University School of Medicine
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03559634
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 201805104
- Status last verified
- Mar 2024
- First submitted
- 22 May 2018
- Last updated
- 27 Mar 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Reproductive Health: Teen Pregnancy. http://www.cdc.gov/teepregnancy/about/index.htm. Accessed Sept 2016.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Guidelines for adolescent health care. 2011; http://www.acog.org/About-ACOG/ACOG-Departments/Adolescent-Health-Care. Accessed Dec 2016.
American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Statement on Teen Pregnancy and Contraception. 2015; http://www.acog.org/About-ACOG/News-Room/Statements/2015/ACOG-Statement-on-Teen-Pregnancy-and-Contraception. Accessed Dec 2016.
Committee on Adolescence. Contraception for adolescents. Pediatrics. 2014 Oct;134(4):e1244-56. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-2299.
PubMed 25266430Healthy People 2020. Family Planning, Adolescent Health. 2014; https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020, 2017.
Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine; Burke PJ, Coles MS, Di Meglio G, Gibson EJ, Handschin SM, Lau M, Marcell AV, Tebb KP, Urbach K. Sexual and reproductive health care: a position paper of the Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. J Adolesc Health. 2014 Apr;54(4):491-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.01.010. No abstract available.
PubMed 24656535Chernick LS, Schnall R, Higgins T, Stockwell MS, Castano PM, Santelli J, Dayan PS. Barriers to and enablers of contraceptive use among adolescent females and their interest in an emergency department based intervention. Contraception. 2015 Mar;91(3):217-25. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.12.003. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
PubMed 25499588Chernick LS, Westhoff C, Ray M, Garcia M, Garth J, Santelli J, Dayan PS. Enhancing referral of sexually active adolescent females from the emergency department to family planning. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015 Apr;24(4):324-8. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2014.4994.
PubMed 25860108Ahmad FA, Jeffe DB, Plax K, Collins KK, Schechtman KB, Doerhoff DE, Garbutt J, Jaffe DM. Computerized self-interviews improve Chlamydia and gonorrhea testing among youth in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Oct;64(4):376-84. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.01.031. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
PubMed 24612901Ahmad FA, Jeffe DB, Plax K, Schechtman KB, Doerhoff DE, Garbutt JM, Jaffe DM. Characteristics of youth agreeing to electronic sexually transmitted infection risk assessment in the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2018 Jan;35(1):46-51. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2016-206199. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
PubMed 28801483
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Mar 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Feasibility Trial of Hormonal Contraceptive Initiation Program in the Pediatric Emergency Department
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03559634
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 201805104
- Conditions
- Contraception, Contraception Behavior
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 55 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Washington University School of MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
- Study start
- 20 May 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jan 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Many female adolescents using the pediatric emergency department (ED) are at higher risk for unintended pregnancy. This is a significant public health issue and hormonal contraception is the mainstay of prevention. Many barriers to hormonal contraception exist and other studies have demonstrated that referral from the ED for hormonal contraception leads to poor follow up.
This study will be a pilot study to assess the feasibility of initiating hormonal contraception in the pediatric ED.
Detailed description
This study will assess the feasibility of initiating hormonal contraception in the pediatric ED. Currently, all 15-21-year-old patients receiving care in our ED are asked to complete an adolescent heath questionnaire to identify risk-factors for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Sexually active female patients who indicate on this questionnaire they are not currently using hormonal contraception will be eligible for participation in this study.
Potential participants will be screened using the EMR and eligible patients will be approached. Consent will be obtained from adults directly and from a parent or guardian for minors that have one present. For minors that present without a parent or guardian, assent only with be obtained from the minor. Participants will be randomized into two groups, an intervention group and a control group. Participants in both groups will be given tablet computer and, through a software application on the tablet, answer questions electronically about their background, medical history, and contraceptive preferences. They will then be shown a video that provides an overview of hormonal contraceptive options. Depending on the participants medical history and contraceptive preferences, they may be offered more in-depth educational videos about specific types of hormonal contraception for which they are eligible (e.g. pill, transdermal patch, intravaginal ring, injection, and implant).
Once they have completed watching the videos, participants in the intervention group will have the option of initiating one of the offered forms of birth control during the ED visit. They will only be offered medications considered low risk and for which they do not have any medical contraindications. Urine pregnancy testing will be done before any method is given. They will be able to start any contraceptive method from among those offered after their screening. Participants in the control group will be offered outpatient referral to initiate contraception, the current standard of care in our ED. All patients in both arms of the study will be given referral/follow up options for further contraceptive care.
All participants in this study will then be followed up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months to determine continuation of contraception practices, follow up practices, satisfaction, and pregnancy rates.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Feasibility trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: Intervention GroupUsing an electronic application, participants answer survey questions about their sexual history, medical history, and contraceptive preferences. They will watch a video that overviews the types of hormonal contraception. Then, based on survey answers, they will be able to watch more in-depth educational videos on methods that they qualify for. Participants will only be offered methods that are considered low risk and without any contraindication based upon responses to survey screening. This may include, contraceptive implant, medroxyprogesterone acetate injection, microgestin pills, xulane patch, or intravaginal ring. Participants will then be given the opportunity to initiate contraception in the ED. All participants will be referred for follow up outpatient health services. Subjects who have medical contraindications to certain contraceptive medications will be given a standardized handout that explains why they were not eligible for the medication(s) while in the ED. |
| Control Group | Other | Other: Control GroupUsing an electronic application, participants answer survey questions about their background, sexual history, medical history, and contraceptive preferences. They will watch a video that overviews the types of hormonal contraception with brief pros and cons of each method. Then, based on participants medical history and contraceptive preferences they will be able to watch more in-depth counseling and educational videos on contraceptive methods that they qualify for. After these videos they will be given information on where they will be able to follow up to receive these contraceptive methods if they wish to start a method. Subjects who have medical contraindications to certain hormonal contraceptive medications will be given a standardized handout that explains why they were not eligible for the medication(s), should this come up in future discussions with their providers. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 15 to 21 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Female patients, 15-21 years old that present to the SLCH pediatric ED
- Report history of vaginal sex on the ED routine screening questionnaire
- Not currently using hormonal contraception
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Pregnant
- Currently using hormonal contraception
- Foster care
- Non-English speaking
- Chief complaint of psychiatric concern, physical abuse or sexual abuse
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention GroupThe electronic application will collect screening health information and contraceptive preferences about the participant. Then, using branch logic, decide which contraceptive options the participant would qualify for based on health history answers. Contraceptive choices being offered include the contraceptive implant, injection, pill, patch, or ring. They will then be able to watch videos about methods they are eligible for. The participant can then decide if they would like to start a medication they qualify for in the ED. | Diagnostic test | Intervention group |
| Control GroupThe electronic application will collect screening health information and contraceptive preferences about the participant. Then, using branch logic, decide which contraceptive options the participant would qualify for based on health history answers. This includes the contraceptive implant, injection, pill, patch, or ring. They will then be able to watch videos about methods they are eligible for. Participants will then be given follow up information on outpatient locations where they can receive these contraceptive methods. | Other | Control Group |
Primary outcome
Initiation of contraception in the ED using the electronic application
Time frame: 12 months
The proportion of enrolled patients that initiate contraception when offered same-day (intervention arm) compared to those that initiate contraception at follow up (the control arm) at 3 months.
6 secondary outcomes
Delivery process related outcomes #1
Time frame: At initial encounter.
Delivery process related outcomes #2
Time frame: At initial encounter.
Delivery process related outcomes #3
Time frame: At initial encounter and at follow up at 3, 6, and 12 months.
Delivery process related outcomes #4
Time frame: At initial encounter.
Contraceptive continuation
Time frame: At 3,6, and 12 months.
Pregnancy rates
Time frame: 12 months.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Mar 2024.
- BackgroundCenters for Disease Control and Prevention. Reproductive Health: Teen Pregnancy. http://www.cdc.gov/teepregnancy/about/index.htm. Accessed Sept 2016.
- BackgroundAmerican College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Guidelines for adolescent health care. 2011; http://www.acog.org/About-ACOG/ACOG-Departments/Adolescent-Health-Care. Accessed Dec 2016.
- BackgroundAmerican Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Statement on Teen Pregnancy and Contraception. 2015; http://www.acog.org/About-ACOG/News-Room/Statements/2015/ACOG-Statement-on-Teen-Pregnancy-and-Contraception. Accessed Dec 2016.
- Background: PubMed 25266430Committee on Adolescence. Contraception for adolescents. Pediatrics. 2014 Oct;134(4):e1244-56. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-2299.
- BackgroundHealthy People 2020. Family Planning, Adolescent Health. 2014; https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020, 2017.
- Background: PubMed 24656535Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine; Burke PJ, Coles MS, Di Meglio G, Gibson EJ, Handschin SM, Lau M, Marcell AV, Tebb KP, Urbach K. Sexual and reproductive health care: a position paper of the Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. J Adolesc Health. 2014 Apr;54(4):491-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.01.010. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 25499588Chernick LS, Schnall R, Higgins T, Stockwell MS, Castano PM, Santelli J, Dayan PS. Barriers to and enablers of contraceptive use among adolescent females and their interest in an emergency department based intervention. Contraception. 2015 Mar;91(3):217-25. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.12.003. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
- Background: PubMed 25860108Chernick LS, Westhoff C, Ray M, Garcia M, Garth J, Santelli J, Dayan PS. Enhancing referral of sexually active adolescent females from the emergency department to family planning. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015 Apr;24(4):324-8. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2014.4994.
- Background: PubMed 24612901Ahmad FA, Jeffe DB, Plax K, Collins KK, Schechtman KB, Doerhoff DE, Garbutt J, Jaffe DM. Computerized self-interviews improve Chlamydia and gonorrhea testing among youth in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Oct;64(4):376-84. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.01.031. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
- Background: PubMed 28801483Ahmad FA, Jeffe DB, Plax K, Schechtman KB, Doerhoff DE, Garbutt JM, Jaffe DM. Characteristics of youth agreeing to electronic sexually transmitted infection risk assessment in the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2018 Jan;35(1):46-51. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2016-206199. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Contraception
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Gender-Transformative Interventions on Contraceptive Use and Reproductive Autonomy in Somalia
Contraceptive Behavior, Social Norms
Recruiting
Impact of Self-Care Family Planning Services on Health and Development in South Sudan (Family Planning Impact Lab)
Contraceptive Behavior, Self Administration
Recruiting
Prospective Multi-Center Trial for FemBloc Permanent Birth Control
Contraception
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Evaluation of the Contraceptive Efficacy and Safety of a New Concentration of an Antiandrogenic Progestogen Combined With a Reduced-Dose Estrogen (LUNA)
Contraception
RecruitingObservational study
Primitive Immunodeficiency, Intrauterine Devices and Menstrual Hygiene Products
Primary Immune Deficiency Diseases
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Intervention Group in people with Contraception and Contraception Behavior, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Initiation of contraception in the ED using the electronic application (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03559634, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Mar 2024.