AzTrials
AzTrials

Adolescent ObesityNCT03561597

Mobile Health Intervention to Identify Early Responders to Treatment in Adolescent Obesity

A study testing Mobile health intervention in people with Adolescent Obesity, run by KK Women's and Children's Hospital at 1 site in Singapore.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background: The Expert Committee on the Assessment, Prevention and Treatment of Child and Adolescent Overweight and Obesity recommends a staged based approach to the management of adolescents with overweight and obesity from Stage 1-4 with increasing intensity of management in higher stages. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 13 to 17 years
Conditions the study is for
Adolescent Obesity
What is being tested?
Mobile health intervention
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteSingapore
Study dates
10 Apr 2018to 21 Oct 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 13 to 17 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Overweight as defined by BMI percentile of above 90th percentile
  • Age 13-17 years old in the year of referral
  • Ability to provide informed consent
  • Adolescents with a phone which is able to download the application to be used on their devices

Who cannot join

  • Patients with secondary causes of obesity especially genetic syndromes e.g. Trisomy 21, Prader-Willi
  • Currently participating in a weight management program
  • Unable to understand and speak English sufficiently to give informed consent and complete the research assessments.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Singapore1 site
  • KKWCH

    Singapore

Other trials in Singapore

About this study

Official title: Pilot Evaluation of a Mobile Health Intervention to Identify Early Responders to Treatment in Adolescent Obesity as a Triage Approach

Background: The Expert Committee on the Assessment, Prevention and Treatment of Child and Adolescent Overweight and Obesity recommends a staged based approach to the management of adolescents with overweight and obesity from Stage 1-4 with increasing intensity of management in higher stages. Mobile health application is an attractive community based treatment for adolescent obesity due to its wide penetration and convenience. Early weight loss has been found to be the strongest predictor of good long term outcome in obesity. However there is currently no known study that use early weight loss as a predictor factor for a stepped up approach using a mobile health application.

Clinical significance: The current study use a mobile health intervention to identify participants with early weight loss in a stepped up approach.

Read more

Primary objective will be to examine the proportion of patients triaged to the low risk Weight Management Clinics (WMC) after brief intervention by a nurse coordination and completion of 4 sessions of Kurbo Program over a 12 month recruitment period.

Secondary objectives will be to examine changes in BMI z-score, metabolic profile, examine program feasibility and fidelity and explore other predictors of poor response to program.

Methodology:

Children aged 13-17 years old with BMI percentile of above 90th percentile, who are referred to the WMC, will receive a brief intervention by the WMC nurse coordinator followed by introduction to Kurbo program, a multifunctional mobile application, for more detailed dietary and physical activity recommendations and implementation of behavioural changes. Patients that are able to engage with Kurbo intervention and showed a decrease in BMI percentile over 4 sessions of Kurbo will be offered the low risk weight management clinic.

At baseline, month 3 and month 6, the patient's weight and height, body fat composition, waist circumference and blood pressure will be measured as per usual standard protocol. Questionnaires to assess eating, quality of life and dietary recall will be administered as part of the research. Accelerometers will also be fitted to assess physical activity.

At baseline and month 6, metabolic blood tests (HbA1C, fasting lipid panel, oral glucose tolerance test, fasting insulin level and liver function test) were collected after a minimum 8 hour fasting period together with bloods for aromatic amino acid, branch chain amino acid and long chain acylcarnitines .

Current low risk WMC patients will be offered 2 monthly follow up with optional dietician and exercise physiologists counselling and exercise sessions. The high risk WMC patients will be routinely offered the standard high risk follow up protocol consisting of weekly follow up with the multidisciplinary team for 4 weeks followed by 2 weekly appointments for 2 months and monthly appointment thereafter based on clinical response.

Being tested
Mobile health intervention
Keywords
stepped care, mobile application
Medical subject headings
Pediatric Obesity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Mobile health interventionBehavioural

    The Kurbo program is a multifunctional mobile application that aid adolescents and their families to learn healthy eating habits and weight management through the use of a mobile application with dietary self-monitoring and weekly interactive coaching sessions. Using the Kurbo app, adolescents track their food and exercise, as well as learn about healthy behaviours through games and videos. The Kurbo coaches check in with adolescents for 15 minutes once a week via video, phone or text over a 12 weeks period.

Study groups in NCT03561597
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Mobile health applicationExperimentalParticipants will undergo Kurbo program, a Mobile health application, for more detailed dietary and physical activity recommendations and implementation of behavioural changes. The patient's progress will be reviewed by the nurse clinician at one month post intervention to determine whether the BMI percentile has shown a reduction through the Kurbo Program. Patients that declined Kurbo intervention, has a BMI of more than 99th percentile or continue to have increase in their BMI percentile in Kurbo program, will be offered the high risk weight management clinic appointment for a more detailed multidisciplinary evaluation for targeted intervention. Patients that are able to engage with Kurbo intervention and showed a decrease in BMI percentile over 4 sessions of Kurbo will be offered the low risk weight management clinic (WMC). There will be a month 3 and month 6 visit for study measurements in this study.
Receives: Behavioral: Mobile health intervention

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion of Patients Triaged to the Low Risk Weight Management Clinics

    Examine the proportion of patients triaged to the low risk weight management clinics after brief intervention by a nurse coordination and completion of 4 sessions of Kurbo Program.

    Measured: 6 month

Secondary outcomes (53)
  1. Kurbo Program Feasibility, Percentage of Participants Who Completed at Least One Health Coaching Session

    To examine the feasibility of using Kurbo program as a waitlist intervention for the target population as measured by quantifying the percentage of patients offered the program who agreed to enrol and engaged in Kurbo coaching session

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Kurbo Program Fidelity

    To examine program fidelity as measured by the percentage of patients who complete all of the 12 sessions of online coaching by Kurbo coaches, as part of Kurbo programme.

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Attrition Rate

    To examine the rate of attrition from weight management clinic after implementation of the waitlist intervention and new model of care in weight management clinic.

    Measured: 6 months

  4. Change in Weight From Baseline to 6 Months

    Change in weight from baseline to 6 months

    Measured: Baseline and 6 months

  5. Change in Weight From Baseline to 3 Months

    Change in weight from baseline to 3 months

    Measured: Baseline and 3 months

  6. Changes in Treatment Outcomes Using BMI Z-score

    To examine changes in treatment outcomes as a function of program fidelity as measured by those who complete more online coaching show greater improvements in BMI z-score. Body mass index (BMI) will be calculated as kg/m2 and BMI-z score calculated using the L, M, S parameters published by the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention. BMI z-score are measures of relative weight adjusted for child age and sex. Reduction of more than 0.25 in childhood obesity has been found to be clinically significant for reduction of cardiovascular risk factors.

    Measured: 6 months

  7. Changes in Treatment Outcomes Using BMI Z-score From Baseline to 3 Months

    To examine changes in treatment outcomes as a function of program fidelity as measured by those who complete more online coaching show greater improvements in BMI z-score. Body mass index (BMI) will be calculated as kg/m2 and BMI-z score calculated using the L, M, S parameters published by the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention. BMI z-score are measures of relative weight adjusted for child age and sex. Reduction of more than 0.25 in childhood obesity has been found to be clinically significant for reduction of cardiovascular risk factors.

    Measured: Baseline and 3 months

  8. Change in %BMIp95 From Baseline to 6 Months

    Measured: Baseline and 6 months

  9. Change in %BMIp95 From Baseline to 3 Months

    Measured: Baseline and 3 months

  10. Change in Waist Circumference From Baseline to 6 Months

    Change in waist circumference from Baseline to 6 months

    Measured: Baseline and 6 months

  11. Change in Waist Circumference From Baseline to 3 Months

    Change in waist circumference from Baseline to 3 months

    Measured: Baseline and 3 months

  12. Change in Waist to Height Ratio From Baseline to 6 Months

    To examine the effect of the waitlist intervention and WMC intervention on waist to height ratio at baseline and 6 months. Waist and height will be measured in cm and ratio of more than 0.5 is indicative of higher cardiometabolic risk. Reduction of the waist height ratio has been shown to be beneficial in cardiometabolic outcomes.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 months

  13. Change in Waist to Height Ratio From Baseline to 3 Months

    To examine the effect of the waitlist intervention and WMC intervention on waist to height ratio at baseline and 3 months. Waist and height will be measured in cm and ratio of more than 0.5 is indicative of higher cardiometabolic risk. Reduction of the waist height ratio has been shown to be beneficial in cardiometabolic outcomes.

    Measured: Baseline and 3 months

  14. Change in Body Fat Percentage From Baseline to 6 Months

    Change in body fat percentage from Baseline to 6 months. Body fat percentage was assessed using a bioimpedance analysis.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 months

  15. Change in Body Fat Percentage From Baseline to 3 Months

    Change in body fat percentage from Baseline to 3 months. Body fat percentage was assessed using a bioimpedance analysis.

    Measured: Baseline and 3 months

  16. Changes in Systolic Blood Pressure Measurements From Baseline to 6 Months

    Changes in systolic blood pressure at baseline and 6 month measured in mmHg

    Measured: Baseline and 6 months

  17. Changes in Systolic Blood Pressure Measurements From Baseline to 3 Months

    Changes in systolic blood pressure at baseline and 3 month measured in mmHg

    Measured: Baseline and 3 months

  18. Changes in Diastolic Blood Pressure Measurements From Baseline to 6 Months

    Changes in diastolic blood pressure at baseline and 6 month measured in mmHg

    Measured: Baseline and 6 months

  19. Changes in Diastolic Blood Pressure Measurements From Baseline to 3 Months

    Changes in diastolicblood pressure at baseline and 3 month measured in mmHg

    Measured: Baseline and 3 months

  20. Changes in Nutrition From Baseline to 6 Months

    To examine the effects of waitlist intervention on nutrition using a three day food diary at baseline and 6 months to assess total caloric intake and number of servings of fruits and vegetables.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 months

  21. Changes in Nutrition From Baseline to 3 Months

    To examine the effects of waitlist intervention on nutrition using a three day food diary at baseline and 3 months to assess total caloric intake and number of servings of fruits and vegetables.

    Measured: Baseline and 3 months

  22. Changes in Servings of Vegetables From Baseline to 6 Months

    To examine the effects of waitlist intervention on nutrition using a three day food diary at baseline and 6 months to assess number of servings of vegetables per day.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 Months

  23. Changes in Servings of Vegetables From Baseline to 3 Months

    To examine the effects of waitlist intervention on nutrition using a three day food diary at baseline and 3 months to assess number of servings of vegetables per day.

    Measured: Baseline and 3 Months

  24. Changes in Physical Activity From Baseline to 6 Months

    To examine the effects of waitlist intervention on physical activity using results from accelerometer to assess time spent on sedentary and moderate to vigorous physical activity at baseline and 6 months. The Actigraph data were processed using the Actilife 6 software. The Puyau cut-off point of 3200 counts per minute (cpm) was used to estimate time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA).

    Measured: Baseline and 6 months

  25. Changes in Physical Activity From Baseline to 3 Months

    To examine the effects of waitlist intervention on physical activity using results from accelerometer to assess time spent on sedentary and moderate to vigorous physical activity at baseline and 3 months. The Actigraph data were processed using the Actilife 6 software. The Puyau cut-off point of 3200 counts per minute (cpm) was used to estimate time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA).

    Measured: Baseline and 3 months

  26. Changes in Total Quality of Life From Baseline to 6 Months

    To examine the effects of waitlist intervention on quality of life at baseline and 6 months using Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL; UK version 4) will be administered as a comprehensive and multi-dimensional construct that includes physical, emotional, and social functioning to assess quality of life in the adolescents. The self-report scale had a five-point response scale (0 = never a problem, 1 = almost never, 2 = sometimes, 3 = often and 4 = almost always). Items are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale, so that higher scores indicate better quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 months

  27. Changes in Total Quality of Life From Baseline to 3 Months

    To examine the effects of waitlist intervention on quality of life at baseline and 3 months using Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL; UK version 4) will be administered as a comprehensive and multi-dimensional construct that includes physical, emotional, and social functioning to assess quality of life in the adolescents. The self-report scale had a five-point response scale (0 = never a problem, 1 = almost never, 2 = sometimes, 3 = often and 4 = almost always). Items are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale, so that higher scores indicate better quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline and 3 months

  28. Changes in Physical Domain of Quality of Life From Baseline to 6 Months

    To examine the effects of waitlist intervention on quality of life, physical domain, at baseline and 6 months using Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL; UK version 4). The self-report scale had a five-point response scale (0 = never a problem, 1 = almost never, 2 = sometimes, 3 = often and 4 = almost always). Items are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale, so that higher scores indicate better quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 months

  29. Changes in Physical Quality of Life From Baseline to 3 Months

    To examine the effects of waitlist intervention on quality of life, physical domain, at baseline and 3 months using Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL; UK version 4). The self-report scale had a five-point response scale (0 = never a problem, 1 = almost never, 2 = sometimes, 3 = often and 4 = almost always). Items are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale, so that higher scores indicate better quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline and 3 months

  30. Changes in Emotional Quality of Life From Baseline to 6 Months

    To examine the effects of waitlist intervention on quality of life, emotional domain, at baseline and 6 months using Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL; UK version 4). The self-report scale had a five-point response scale (0 = never a problem, 1 = almost never, 2 = sometimes, 3 = often and 4 = almost always). Items are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale, so that higher scores indicate better quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 months

  31. Changes in Emotional Quality of Life From Baseline to 3 Months

    To examine the effects of waitlist intervention on quality of life, emotional domain, at baseline and 3 months using Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL; UK version 4). The self-report scale had a five-point response scale (0 = never a problem, 1 = almost never, 2 = sometimes, 3 = often and 4 = almost always). Items are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale, so that higher scores indicate better quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline and 3 months

  32. Changes in School Quality of Life From Baseline to 6 Months

    To examine the effects of waitlist intervention on quality of life, school domain, at baseline and 6 months using Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL; UK version 4). The self-report scale had a five-point response scale (0 = never a problem, 1 = almost never, 2 = sometimes, 3 = often and 4 = almost always). Items are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale, so that higher scores indicate better quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 months

  33. Changes in School Quality of Life From Baseline to 3 Months

    To examine the effects of waitlist intervention on quality of life, school domain, at baseline and 3 months using Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL; UK version 4). The self-report scale had a five-point response scale (0 = never a problem, 1 = almost never, 2 = sometimes, 3 = often and 4 = almost always). Items are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale, so that higher scores indicate better quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline and 3 Months

  34. Changes in Psychosocial Quality of Life From Baseline to 6 Months

    To examine the effects of waitlist intervention on quality of life, psychosocial domain, at baseline and 6 months using Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL; UK version 4). The self-report scale had a five-point response scale (0 = never a problem, 1 = almost never, 2 = sometimes, 3 = often and 4 = almost always). Items are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale, so that higher scores indicate better quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 Months

  35. Changes in Psychosocial Quality of Life From Baseline to 3 Months

    To examine the effects of waitlist intervention on quality of life, psychosocial domain, at baseline and 3 months using Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL; UK version 4). The self-report scale had a five-point response scale (0 = never a problem, 1 = almost never, 2 = sometimes, 3 = often and 4 = almost always). Items are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale, so that higher scores indicate better quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline and 3 Months

  36. Insulin Resistance Index Changes

    Examine changes in insulin resistance index at baseline and 6 months. Insulin resistance index is calculated according to the formula: fasting insulin (microU/L) x fasting glucose (nmol/L)/22.5

    Measured: Baseline and 6 months

  37. Changes in Fasting Blood Glucose From Baseline to 6 Months

    Examine changes in fasting blood glucose result changes at baseline and month 6 measured in nmol/L

    Measured: Baseline and 6 months

  38. Changes in 120 Minute Glucose Result in Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Measurements

    Examine changes in 120 minute glucose result changes in oral glucose tolerance test at baseline and month 6 measured in nmol/L.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 months

  39. Changes in Fasting Lipid Measurements, High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), From Baseline to 6 Months

    Examine changes in fasting lipids, high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), at month 6 measured in mg/dL

    Measured: Baseline and 6 months

  40. Changes in Fasting Lipid Measurements, Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), From Baseline to 6 Months

    Examine changes in fasting lipids, low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), at month 6 measured in mg/dL

    Measured: Baseline and 6 months

  41. Changes in Fasting Lipid Measurements, Triglycerides (TG), From Baseline to 6 Months

    Examine changes in fasting lipids, Triglycerides (TG), at month 6 measured in mg/dL

    Measured: Baseline and 6 months

  42. Changes in Alanine Transaminase From Baseline to 6 Months

    Changes in Alanine transaminase from Baseline to 6 months measured in U/L

    Measured: Baseline and 6 months

  43. Changes in Aspartate Transaminase From Baseline to 6 Months

    Changes in Aspartate transaminase from Baseline to 6 months, measured in U/L

    Measured: Baseline and 6 months

  44. Changes in Disordered Eating on Dietary Restraint From Baseline to 6 Months

    To examine the effects of waitlist intervention on disordered eating at baseline and 6 months. Psychological dimensions of eating behaviors were determined using a validated self-reporting Eating Pattern Inventory for Children (EPI-C). The 20-item questionnaire assessed four dimensions ((dietary restraint, external eating, parental pressure to eat, and emotional eating). Responses to each item were listed on a 4-point Likert scale (1 = not at all, 2 = sometimes, 3 = mostly, 4 = always). Higher scores are indicative of greater dietary restraint.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 months

  45. Changes in Disordered Eating, Dietary Restraint From Baseline to 3 Months

    To examine the effects of waitlist intervention on disordered eating at baseline and 3 months. Psychological dimensions of eating behaviors were determined using a validated self-reporting Eating Pattern Inventory for Children (EPI-C). The 20-item questionnaire assessed four dimensions ((dietary restraint, external eating, parental pressure to eat, and emotional eating). Responses to each item were listed on a 4-point Likert scale (1 = not at all, 2 = sometimes, 3 = mostly, 4 = always). Higher scores are indicative of greater dietary restraint.

    Measured: Baseline and 3 months

  46. Changes in Disordered Eating, External Eating From Baseline to 6 Months

    To examine the effects of waitlist intervention on External Eating dimension on disordered eating at baseline and 6 months. Psychological dimensions of eating behaviors were determined using a validated self-reporting Eating Pattern Inventory for Children (EPI-C). The 20-item questionnaire assessed four dimensions ((dietary restraint, external eating, parental pressure to eat, and emotional eating). Responses to each item were listed on a 4-point Likert scale (1 = not at all, 2 = sometimes, 3 = mostly, 4 = always). Higher scores are indicative of greater dietary restraint.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 months

  47. Changes in Disordered Eating, External Eating From Baseline to 3 Months

    To examine the effects of waitlist intervention on External Eating dimension on disordered eating at baseline and 3 months. Psychological dimensions of eating behaviors were determined using a validated self-reporting Eating Pattern Inventory for Children (EPI-C). The 20-item questionnaire assessed four dimensions ((dietary restraint, external eating, parental pressure to eat, and emotional eating). Responses to each item were listed on a 4-point Likert scale (1 = not at all, 2 = sometimes, 3 = mostly, 4 = always). Higher scores are indicative of greater dietary restraint.

    Measured: Baseline and 3 months

  48. Changes in Disordered Eating, Parental Pressure to Eat, From Baseline to 6 Months

    To examine the effects of waitlist intervention on Parental Pressure to Eat dimension on disordered eating at baseline and 6 months. Psychological dimensions of eating behaviors were determined using a validated self-reporting Eating Pattern Inventory for Children (EPI-C). The 20-item questionnaire assessed four dimensions ((dietary restraint, external eating, parental pressure to eat, and emotional eating). Responses to each item were listed on a 4-point Likert scale (1 = not at all, 2 = sometimes, 3 = mostly, 4 = always). Higher scores are indicative of greater dietary restraint.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 months

  49. Changes in Disordered Eating, Parental Pressure to Eat, From Baseline to 3 Months

    To examine the effects of waitlist intervention on Parental Pressure to Eat dimension on disordered eating at baseline and 3 months. Psychological dimensions of eating behaviors were determined using a validated self-reporting Eating Pattern Inventory for Children (EPI-C). The 20-item questionnaire assessed four dimensions ((dietary restraint, external eating, parental pressure to eat, and emotional eating). Responses to each item were listed on a 4-point Likert scale (1 = not at all, 2 = sometimes, 3 = mostly, 4 = always). Higher scores are indicative of greater dietary restraint.

    Measured: Baseline and 3 months

  50. Changes in Disordered Eating, Emotional Eating, From Baseline to 6 Months

    To examine the effects of waitlist intervention on Emotional Eating dimension on disordered eating at baseline and 6 months. Psychological dimensions of eating behaviors were determined using a validated self-reporting Eating Pattern Inventory for Children (EPI-C). The 20-item questionnaire assessed four dimensions ((dietary restraint, external eating, parental pressure to eat, and emotional eating). Responses to each item were listed on a 4-point Likert scale (1 = not at all, 2 = sometimes, 3 = mostly, 4 = always). Higher scores are indicative of greater dietary restraint.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 months

  51. Changes in Disordered Eating, Emotional Eating, From Baseline to 3 Months

    To examine the effects of waitlist intervention on Emotional Eating dimension on disordered eating at baseline and 3 months. Psychological dimensions of eating behaviors were determined using a validated self-reporting Eating Pattern Inventory for Children (EPI-C). The 20-item questionnaire assessed four dimensions ((dietary restraint, external eating, parental pressure to eat, and emotional eating). Responses to each item were listed on a 4-point Likert scale (1 = not at all, 2 = sometimes, 3 = mostly, 4 = always). Higher scores are indicative of greater dietary restraint.

    Measured: Baseline and 3 months

  52. Metabolomic Profile Changes From Baseline to 6 Months (BCAA)

    Examine changes in branched chain amino acid(BCAA) at baseline and month 6. Metabolites to be analysed include BCAA which is a combination of isoleucine, leucine, valine. All metabolites concentrations will be reported in micro mol per litre

    Measured: baseline and 6 months

  53. Metabolomic Profile Changes From Baseline to 6 Months (AAA)

    Examine changes in aromatic amino acid (AAA) at baseline and month 6. Metabolites to be analysed include AAA which is a combination of phenylalanine and tyrosine. All metabolites concentrations will be reported in micro mol per litre.

    Measured: baseline and 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Jun 2018
  2. Study start10 Apr 2018
  3. Primary completion21 Oct 2019
  4. Study completion21 Oct 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
prospective single arm study
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
40 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03561597
Sponsor's protocol ID
006100317
Status last verified
Apr 2018
First submitted
7 Mar 2018
Last updated
6 Dec 2021
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Not available to other researchers

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Mobile health intervention in people with Adolescent Obesity, run by KK Women's and Children's Hospital at 1 site in Singapore.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Dec 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Singapore. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Dec 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportion of Patients Triaged to the Low Risk Weight Management Clinics (time frame: 6 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Dec 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in