AzTrials
AzTrials

Inaccurate Transfer and Bond Failure of Conventional Indirect Bonding TrayNCT03564717

Evaluation of Segmented Versus Full Arch Three Dimensionally Printed Transfer Tray for Orthodontic Indirect Bonding

A study testing Segmented three dimensionally printed transfer tray in people with Inaccurate Transfer and Bond Failure of Conventional Indirect Bonding Tray and Accuracy of Bracket Transfer and Bond Failure Rate of Full Arch and Segmented Digitally Printed Trays, run by Cairo University.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is conducted to overcome the problems of conventional indirect bonding technique, through investigating accuracy of two novel three dimensionally digitally printed indirect bonding transfer trays (full arch \& segmented) in terms of accuracy of transferring brackets, rate of immediate bond failure and chair… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 to 38 years
What is being tested?
Segmented three dimensionally printed transfer tray
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
132 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Jul 2018to 30 Dec 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 to 38 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients seeking fixed orthodontic treatment with full set of permanent teeth including second molars.
  • No sex predilection.
  • Mild to moderate crowding cases (4-6 mm).

Who cannot join

  • Severely rotated teeth
  • Enamel hypoplasia or hypocalcification.
  • Systemic disease that contraindicates orthodontic treatment.
  • Presence of deep carious lesions or large restorations.
  • No or poor patient's compliance \& bad oral hygiene.
  • Psychological problems.

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of Segmented Versus Full Arch Three Dimensionally Printed Transfer Tray for Orthodontic Indirect Bonding: Randomized Controlled Trial

This study is conducted to overcome the problems of conventional indirect bonding technique, through investigating accuracy of two novel three dimensionally digitally printed indirect bonding transfer trays (full arch \& segmented) in terms of accuracy of transferring brackets, rate of immediate bond failure and chair side time.

Read the detailed description

Fourteen patients (7 in each group) with mild to moderate crowding, requiring orthodontic treatment with full set of permanent teeth including second molars, will be selected for this study. A total of 196 brackets will be used (98 Full Arch Tray and 98 Segment Arch Tray). The same bracket type and bonding material will used in both groups. The accuracy of bracket transfer will be measured by 3 Shape Ortho planner software (Bracket Placement Module), rate of bond failure by counting number of debonded brackets upon tray removal \& chair side time by using digital watch.

Being tested
Segmented three dimensionally printed transfer tray

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Segmented three dimensionally printed transfer trayOther

    Segmented indirect bonding transfer tray

Study groups in NCT03564717
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Segmented Three dimensionally printed transfer trayExperimentalNot described
Receives: Other: Segmented three dimensionally printed transfer tray
Full arch three dimensionally printed transfer trayNo interventionNot described

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Accuracy of 3D printed full arch &segmented transfer tray.

    Using Digital Measurements on 3shape software in mm- degrees

    Measured: immediate

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Chairside Time

    Digital stopwatch in seconds

    Measured: immediate

  2. Immediate Bond Failure

    Counting number of brackets or tubes failed immediately after bonding

    Measured: immediate

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Jun 2018
  2. Study start1 Jul 2018 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion30 Nov 2018 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2018 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
132 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03564717
Sponsor's protocol ID
CEBD-CU-2018-04-17
Status last verified
Jun 2018
First submitted
8 Jun 2018
Last updated
21 Jun 2018
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Segmented three dimensionally printed transfer tray in people with Inaccurate Transfer and Bond Failure of Conventional Indirect Bonding Tray and Accuracy of Bracket Transfer and Bond Failure Rate of Full Arch and Segmented Digitally Printed Trays, run by Cairo University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jun 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Accuracy of 3D printed full arch &segmented transfer tray. (time frame: immediate). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jun 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in