Progesterone Supplementation in Women Undergoing ARTPhase 3SARANCT03565211
Clinical Safety Study of the Progesterone Vaginal Ring in Women Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology Procedures
A Phase 3 study testing Progesterone vaginal ring in people with Progesterone Supplementation in Women Undergoing ART, run by Ferring Pharmaceuticals at 15 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study is to assess the safety of Progesterone Vaginal Ring (PVR) in women undergoing fresh embryo transfer (ART). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 34 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Progesterone Supplementation in Women Undergoing ART
- What is being tested?
- Progesterone vaginal ring
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 352 participants
- Where
- 15 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 26 Jul 2018to 29 Jul 2019
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 34 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Pre-menopausal women aged 18-34 at the time of consent.
- Documentation of a normal uterine cavity by hysteroscopy, hydrosonogram, or hysterosalpingogram within one year of screening.
- Normal Pap smear test within 24 months of screening.
- At least one cycle without reproductive hormone medication prior to screening follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and estradiol blood draw.
- Tubal, idiopathic, male factor, ovulatory dysfunction, or endometriosis-linked infertility.
Who cannot join
- Body mass index greater than 38 kg/m^2.
- FSH greater than 15 IU/L during the early follicular phase (Day 2-4). For those participants with polycystic ovarian syndrome, a Day 2-4 FSH level can be obtained following a progestogen withdrawal or spontaneous menses.
- Clinically significant gynecologic pathology, such as submucosal fibroids, intramural fibroids >5 cm, communicating hydrosalpinx, uncorrected uterine septum, endometrial cancer or endometrial atypia, scar tissue inside the cavity or poorly developed uterine lining from prior uterine surgery, pelvic tuberculosis, or any other conditions that could adversely affect pregnancy success.
- Uncontrolled elevation of prolactin or too little thyroid hormone in the blood.
- History of more than one failed fresh in vitro fertilization cycle. A failed cycle is defined as having started a cycle and not becoming pregnant or pregnancy loss prior to the 20th week of pregnancy.
Trial locations and contacts
15 sites in 1 country.
15 sites in 1 country
United States15 sites
Abington Reproductive Medicine
Abington, Pennsylvania, 19046
Center for Assisted Reproduction
Bedford, Texas, 76022
Idaho Center for Reproductive Medicine
Boise, Idaho, 83702
Main Line Fertility Center
Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania, 19010
Women's Medical Research Group
Clearwater, Florida, 33759
HRC Fertility
Encino, California, 91436
InVia Fertility
Hoffman Estates, Illinois, 60169
Houston Fertility Institute
Houston, Texas, 77063
Reproductive Associates of DE
Newark, Delaware, 19713
Eastern Virginia Medical School | EVMS Obstetrics & Gynecology
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507
Utah Fertility Center
Pleasant Grove, Utah, 84062
Carolina Conceptions
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27607
Fertility Treatment Center
Tempe, Arizona, 85284
Center of Reproductive Medicine
Webster, Texas, 77598
Center for Reproductive Medicine
Winter Park, Florida, 32789
About this study
Official title: A Prospective, Multi-Center, Non-Comparative Trial of the Clinical Safety of the Progesterone Vaginal Ring in Women Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Procedures
The purpose of the study is to assess the safety of Progesterone Vaginal Ring (PVR) in women undergoing fresh embryo transfer (ART).
- Being tested
- Progesterone vaginal ring
- Keywords
- Progesterone vaginal ring (PVR), Vaginal progesterone ring, Assisted reproductive technology (ART), Infertility
- Medical subject headings
- Infertility
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Progesterone vaginal ringDrug
A flexible, non-degradable PVR containing progesterone in micronized formulation and dispersed evenly throughout the ring.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Progesterone vaginal ring (PVR) | Experimental | Treatment started on the day following oocyte retrieval and could be continued through Week 12 of pregnancy (10 weeks post-oocyte retrieval), depending on the participants pregnancy assessment. A new PVR was inserted every 7 days with up to 10 PVRs used. Receives: Drug: Progesterone vaginal ring |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cumulative Rate of Spontaneous Abortions Occurring on or Before 12 Weeks Post-oocyte Retrieval
Frequency of participants with spontaneous abortions on or before 12 weeks post-oocyte retrieval and undergoing fresh embryo transfer was presented.
Spontaneous abortion was defined as two positive beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) tests occurring at least two days apart on or after 2 weeks post-oocyte retrieval, but followed by observation of any empty intrauterine gestational sac (blighted ovum), intrauterine gestation without a fetal heart beat, or absence of viable fetuses, as documented by transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS).
Measured: On or before 12 weeks post-oocyte retrieval
Secondary outcomes (19)
Cumulative Rate of Spontaneous Abortions Occurring at 6 Weeks Post-oocyte Retrieval
Frequency of participants with spontaneous abortions at 6 weeks post-oocyte retrieval was presented.
Measured: At 6 weeks post-oocyte retrieval
Cumulative Rate of Spontaneous Abortions Occurring at 10 Weeks Post-oocyte Retrieval
Frequency of participants with spontaneous abortions at 10 weeks post-oocyte retrieval was presented.
Measured: At 10 weeks post-oocyte retrieval
Cumulative Rate of Biochemical Abortion Within 6 Weeks Post-oocyte Retrieval
Frequency of participants with biochemical abortions within 6 weeks post-oocyte retrieval was presented.
Biochemical abortion was defined as a positive β-hCG test at 2 weeks and 2 weeks +3-4 days post-oocyte retrieval, but followed by no observed gestational sac on a later TVUS, or followed by a negative β-hCG test.
Measured: Within 6 weeks post-oocyte retrieval
Cumulative Rate of Biochemical Abortion Within 10 Weeks Post-oocyte Retrieval
Frequency of participants with biochemical abortions within 10 weeks post-oocyte retrieval was presented.
Measured: Within 10 weeks post-oocyte retrieval
Positive β-hCG Rate at 2 Weeks and 2 Weeks +3-4 Days Post Oocyte Retrieval
Frequency of participants with positive β-hCG rate at 2 weeks and 2 weeks +3-4 Days was presented. Positive β-hCG was defined as a positive serum β-hCG test at 2 weeks and 2 weeks +3-4 Days post-oocyte retrieval.
Measured: At 2 weeks and 2 weeks +3-4 Days post oocyte retrieval
Clinical Pregnancy Rate at 6 Weeks
Frequency of participants with clinical pregnancy at 6 weeks was presented. Clinical pregnancy was defined as a TVUS showing at least 1 intrauterine gestational sac with fetal heart-beat at 6 weeks post-oocyte retrieval.
Measured: At 6 weeks post-oocyte retrieval
Clinical Pregnancy Rate at 10 Weeks
Frequency of participants with clinical pregnancy at 10 weeks was presented.
Measured: At 10 weeks post-oocyte retrieval
Rate of Ectopic and Heterotopic Pregnancies Following Oocyte Retrieval
Frequency of participants with ectopic and heterotopic pregnancies was presented.
Measured: At 4 weeks +3-4 Days after oocyte retrieval
Rate of Abnormal Findings in Clinical Laboratory Tests (Clinical Chemistry, Hematology, and Urinalysis)
Participants with at least one abnormal finding in clinical laboratory tests (i.e. abnormal clinical significant [CS] values: as assessed by investigator) were reported. Clinical chemistry included: glucose, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, potassium, sodium, chloride, calcium, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and gamma-glutamyl transferase; hematology included: basophils, eosinophils, hematocrit, hemoglobin, lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils, platelets, erythrocytes, and leukocytes; urinalysis included: specific gravity, ketones, pH, protein, blood, and glucose.
Measured: From Day 1 of PVR treatment (day after oocyte retrieval) up to end-of-trial (12 weeks post-oocyte retrieval)
Rate of Abnormal Findings in Vital Signs
Participants with at least one abnormal finding (i.e. abnormal CS values: as assessed by investigator) in vital signs were reported. Vital signs includes: Weight (kg): decrease of >=7% from baseline (BL) or increase of >=7% from BL; Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP): <=90 mmHg and decrease of >=20 mmHg from BL or >=180 mmHg and increase of >= 20 mmHg from BL; Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP): <= 50 mmHg and decrease of >= 15 mmHg from BL or >=105 mmHg and increase of >=15 mmHg from BL; Heart Rate: <=50 (beats per minute [bpm]) and decrease of >= 15 bpm from BL or >=120 bpm and increase of >=15 from BL; Temperature >= 38.3 degree Celsius.
Measured: From Day 1 of PVR treatment (day after oocyte retrieval) up to end-of-trial (12 weeks post-oocyte retrieval)
Frequency, Intensity/Grade, Seriousness, and Relatedness of Adverse Events (AEs)
The frequency of participants with total AEs, AEs by categories of intensity (mild, moderate, severe), seriousness and relatedness was presented. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant participating in a clinical trial. The intensity of an AE was classified using the following 3-point scale: mild=awareness of signs or symptoms, but no disruption of usual activity; moderate=event sufficient to affect usual activity (disturbing); or severe= inability to work or perform usual activities (unacceptable). Seriousness refers to death, hospitalization/ prolongation of existing hospitalization, a life-threatening experience, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or congenital anomaly. The possibility of whether the IMP caused the AE would be classified as: reasonable possibility, no reasonable possibility. All the reasonable possible causality to the IMP were referred to as adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Relatedness of AEs to IMP was assessed by the investigator.
Measured: From Day 1 of PVR treatment (day after oocyte retrieval) up to end-of-trial (12 weeks post-oocyte retrieval)
Frequency and Intensity/Grade of Vaginal Bleeding/Spotting
Frequency of participants with vaginal bleeding/spotting was presented in total and by categories of intensity/grade (mild, moderate and severe). Vaginal bleeding was recorded in a bleeding log by the participant. The severity of the bleeding was determined using a Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment chart.
Measured: From Day 1 of PVR treatment (day after oocyte retrieval) up to end-of-trial (12 weeks post-oocyte retrieval)
Frequency and Intensity/Grade of Vaginal Hemorrhage
Frequency of participants with vaginal hemorrhage was presented in total and by categories of intensity/grade (mild, moderate and severe). Vaginal hemorrhage was defined as a) blood loss of greater than 500 mL based on the opinion of the Investigator or b) hemoglobin post-treatment lesser than 10 gm/dL or c) blood loss requiring transfusion.
Measured: From Day 1 of PVR treatment (day after oocyte retrieval) up to end-of-trial (12 weeks post-oocyte retrieval)
Frequency and Intensity/Grade of Vaginal Pain
The frequency of participants with vaginal pain was presented in total and by categories of intensity/grade.
The intensity of vaginal pain was evaluated as symptoms score of pain and dyspareunia (pain with sexual activity) as: Grade 1 (mild) - Pain causing no or minimal inference with usual social \& functional activities; Grade 2 (moderate) - Pain causing greater than minimal inference with usual social \& functional activities or the need for non-narcotic medication; Grade 3 (severe) - Pain causing inability to perform usual social \& functional activities or the need for narcotic medication; Grade 4 (potentially life threatening) - Disabling pain causing inability to perform basic self-care functions OR hospitalization (other than emergency room visit) indicated.
Dyspareunia (pain with sexual activity): Grade 1 (mild) - Pain causing no or minimal inference with sexual function; Grade 2 (moderate) - Pain causing greater than minimal inference with sexual function.
Measured: From Day 1 of PVR treatment (day after oocyte retrieval) up to end-of-trial (12 weeks post-oocyte retrieval)
Frequency and Intensity/Grade of Vaginal Infection
Frequency of participants with vaginal infection was presented in total and by categories of intensity/grade (mild, moderate and severe).
Measured: From Day 1 of PVR treatment (day after oocyte retrieval) up to end-of-trial (12 weeks post-oocyte retrieval)
Frequency and Intensity/Grade of Vaginal Irritation
The frequency of participants with vaginal irritation was presented in total and by categories of intensity/grade. The intensity of vaginal irritation evaluated as symptoms score of vaginal itching, vaginal dryness, and vaginal discharge. Vaginal itching: Grade 1 (mild)-itching causing no, mild or moderate inference with usual social \& functional activities; Grade 2 (moderate)-itching causing inability to perform usual social \& functional activities; may require intervention such as antihistamine or bathing. Vaginal dryness: Grade 1 (mild)-dryness causing no or minimal inference with usual sexual, social \& functional activities; Grade 2 (moderate)-dryness causing greater than minimal inference with usual sexual, social \& functional activities. Vaginal discharge by participant report: Grade 1 (mild)-mild-moderate increase in amount above participant BL-no sanitary protection required; Grade 2 (moderate)-profuse increase in discharge requiring pad use or other hygienic intervention.
Measured: From Day 1 of PVR treatment (day after oocyte retrieval) up to end-of-trial (12 weeks post-oocyte retrieval)
Frequency, Intensity/Grade, Seriousness, and Relatedness of AEs Associated With Vaginal and Cervical Abrasions and Lesions
Frequency of participants with AEs associated with vaginal and cervical abrasions and lesions, by intensity, seriousness, \& relatedness was presented. Intensity was evaluated as symptoms score: Vaginal/cervical lesions:Grade 0 (Normal)- Normal variants including skin tags, moles, scars, etc; Grade 1 (mild) - Blisters, ulcerations, or pustules, no treatment indicated; Grade 2 (moderate)- Blisters, ulcerations, or pustules with treatment indicated; Grade 3 (severe) - Severe epithelial disruption requiring hospitalization; Vaginal/cervical abrasions: Grade 0 (Normal) - None; Grade 1 (mild)- Superficial disruptions and disruptions extending through the mucosa with minimal impact on life; Grade 2 (moderate)- Large disruptions extending through the mucosa or large superficial disruptions, hospitalization not indicated; Grade 3 (severe)- Large disruptions extending through the mucosa or large superficial disruptions, hospitalization indicated. Relatedness to IMP was assessed by investigator.
Measured: From Day 1 of PVR treatment (day after oocyte retrieval) up to end-of-trial (12 weeks post-oocyte retrieval)
Frequency, Intensity/Grade, Seriousness, and Relatedness of AEs Associated With Vaginal Adhesions
The frequency of participants with AEs associated with vaginal adhesion (total), by categories of intensity, seriousness, and relatedness was presented.
The intensity was evaluated as symptoms score of vaginal adhesion as: Grade 0 (Normal) - None; Grade 1 (mild) - asymptomatic, manual removal of ring possible; Grade 2 (moderate) - Symptomatic (eg: irritation reported by participant), manual removal of ring possible; Grade 3 (severe) - Surgical intervention (eg: adhesiolysis) required to resolve; Grade 4 (potentially life threatening) - urgent intervention indicated. The AEs associated with vaginal adhesion of Grade 4 intensity were considered to be serious. Relatedness to IMP was assessed by investigator.
Measured: From Day 1 of PVR treatment (day after oocyte retrieval) up to end-of-trial (12 weeks post-oocyte retrieval)
Frequency and Reason for PVR Discontinuation
Frequency of participants who prematurely discontinued PVR (i.e. did not fulfill 10 weeks of PVR treatment) was presented by reason.
Measured: From Day 1 of PVR treatment (day after oocyte retrieval) up to end-of-trial (12 weeks post-oocyte retrieval)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Jun 2018
- Study start26 Jul 2018
- Primary completion29 Jul 2019
- Study completion29 Jul 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Progesterone Supplementation in Women Undergoing ARTStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 352 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ferring Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Global Clinical Compliance, Study director, Ferring Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03565211
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 000293
- Acronym
- SARA
- Status last verified
- Jul 2020
- First submitted
- 18 May 2018
- Last updated
- 23 Nov 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Stadtmauer LA, Schnell VL, Park JK, Slater CC, Foster ED, Grover SA, Heiser PW. Safety evaluation of a novel progesterone vaginal ring (PVR) for luteal phase support: SARA trial. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2026 May 29. doi: 10.1007/s13346-026-02158-x. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42213348
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Nov 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective, Multi-Center, Non-Comparative Trial of the Clinical Safety of the Progesterone Vaginal Ring in Women Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Procedures
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03565211
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SARA / 000293
- Keywords
- Progesterone vaginal ring (PVR), Vaginal progesterone ring, Assisted reproductive technology (ART), Infertility
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 352 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ferring PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 26 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 29 Jul 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 23 Nov 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study is to assess the safety of Progesterone Vaginal Ring (PVR) in women undergoing fresh embryo transfer (ART).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Progesterone vaginal ring (PVR) | Experimental | Drug: Progesterone vaginal ringTreatment started on the day following oocyte retrieval and could be continued through Week 12 of pregnancy (10 weeks post-oocyte retrieval), depending on the participants pregnancy assessment. A new PVR was inserted every 7 days with up to 10 PVRs used. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 34 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Pre-menopausal women aged 18-34 at the time of consent.
- Documentation of a normal uterine cavity by hysteroscopy, hydrosonogram, or hysterosalpingogram within one year of screening.
- Normal Pap smear test within 24 months of screening.
- At least one cycle without reproductive hormone medication prior to screening follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and estradiol blood draw.
- Tubal, idiopathic, male factor, ovulatory dysfunction, or endometriosis-linked infertility.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Body mass index greater than 38 kg/m^2.
- FSH greater than 15 IU/L during the early follicular phase (Day 2-4). For those participants with polycystic ovarian syndrome, a Day 2-4 FSH level can be obtained following a progestogen withdrawal or spontaneous menses.
- Clinically significant gynecologic pathology, such as submucosal fibroids, intramural fibroids >5 cm, communicating hydrosalpinx, uncorrected uterine septum, endometrial cancer or endometrial atypia, scar tissue inside the cavity or poorly developed uterine lining from prior uterine surgery, pelvic tuberculosis, or any other conditions that could adversely affect pregnancy success.
- Uncontrolled elevation of prolactin or too little thyroid hormone in the blood.
- History of more than one failed fresh in vitro fertilization cycle. A failed cycle is defined as having started a cycle and not becoming pregnant or pregnancy loss prior to the 20th week of pregnancy.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Progesterone vaginal ringA flexible, non-degradable PVR containing progesterone in micronized formulation and dispersed evenly throughout the ring. | Drug | Progesterone vaginal ring (PVR) |
Primary outcome
Cumulative Rate of Spontaneous Abortions Occurring on or Before 12 Weeks Post-oocyte Retrieval
Time frame: On or before 12 weeks post-oocyte retrieval
Frequency of participants with spontaneous abortions on or before 12 weeks post-oocyte retrieval and undergoing fresh embryo transfer was presented. Spontaneous abortion was defined as two positive beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) tests occurring at least two days apart on or after 2 weeks post-oocyte retrieval, but followed by observation of any empty intrauterine gestational sac (blighted ovum), intrauterine gestation without a fetal heart beat, or absence of viable fetuses, as documented by transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS).
19 secondary outcomes
Cumulative Rate of Spontaneous Abortions Occurring at 6 Weeks Post-oocyte Retrieval
Time frame: At 6 weeks post-oocyte retrieval
Cumulative Rate of Spontaneous Abortions Occurring at 10 Weeks Post-oocyte Retrieval
Time frame: At 10 weeks post-oocyte retrieval
Cumulative Rate of Biochemical Abortion Within 6 Weeks Post-oocyte Retrieval
Time frame: Within 6 weeks post-oocyte retrieval
Cumulative Rate of Biochemical Abortion Within 10 Weeks Post-oocyte Retrieval
Time frame: Within 10 weeks post-oocyte retrieval
Positive β-hCG Rate at 2 Weeks and 2 Weeks +3-4 Days Post Oocyte Retrieval
Time frame: At 2 weeks and 2 weeks +3-4 Days post oocyte retrieval
Clinical Pregnancy Rate at 6 Weeks
Time frame: At 6 weeks post-oocyte retrieval
Clinical Pregnancy Rate at 10 Weeks
Time frame: At 10 weeks post-oocyte retrieval
Rate of Ectopic and Heterotopic Pregnancies Following Oocyte Retrieval
Time frame: At 4 weeks +3-4 Days after oocyte retrieval
Rate of Abnormal Findings in Clinical Laboratory Tests (Clinical Chemistry, Hematology, and Urinalysis)
Time frame: From Day 1 of PVR treatment (day after oocyte retrieval) up to end-of-trial (12 weeks post-oocyte retrieval)
Rate of Abnormal Findings in Vital Signs
Time frame: From Day 1 of PVR treatment (day after oocyte retrieval) up to end-of-trial (12 weeks post-oocyte retrieval)
Frequency, Intensity/Grade, Seriousness, and Relatedness of Adverse Events (AEs)
Time frame: From Day 1 of PVR treatment (day after oocyte retrieval) up to end-of-trial (12 weeks post-oocyte retrieval)
Frequency and Intensity/Grade of Vaginal Bleeding/Spotting
Time frame: From Day 1 of PVR treatment (day after oocyte retrieval) up to end-of-trial (12 weeks post-oocyte retrieval)
Frequency and Intensity/Grade of Vaginal Hemorrhage
Time frame: From Day 1 of PVR treatment (day after oocyte retrieval) up to end-of-trial (12 weeks post-oocyte retrieval)
Frequency and Intensity/Grade of Vaginal Pain
Time frame: From Day 1 of PVR treatment (day after oocyte retrieval) up to end-of-trial (12 weeks post-oocyte retrieval)
Frequency and Intensity/Grade of Vaginal Infection
Time frame: From Day 1 of PVR treatment (day after oocyte retrieval) up to end-of-trial (12 weeks post-oocyte retrieval)
Frequency and Intensity/Grade of Vaginal Irritation
Time frame: From Day 1 of PVR treatment (day after oocyte retrieval) up to end-of-trial (12 weeks post-oocyte retrieval)
Frequency, Intensity/Grade, Seriousness, and Relatedness of AEs Associated With Vaginal and Cervical Abrasions and Lesions
Time frame: From Day 1 of PVR treatment (day after oocyte retrieval) up to end-of-trial (12 weeks post-oocyte retrieval)
Frequency, Intensity/Grade, Seriousness, and Relatedness of AEs Associated With Vaginal Adhesions
Time frame: From Day 1 of PVR treatment (day after oocyte retrieval) up to end-of-trial (12 weeks post-oocyte retrieval)
Frequency and Reason for PVR Discontinuation
Time frame: From Day 1 of PVR treatment (day after oocyte retrieval) up to end-of-trial (12 weeks post-oocyte retrieval)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Nov 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42213348Stadtmauer LA, Schnell VL, Park JK, Slater CC, Foster ED, Grover SA, Heiser PW. Safety evaluation of a novel progesterone vaginal ring (PVR) for luteal phase support: SARA trial. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2026 May 29. doi: 10.1007/s13346-026-02158-x. Online ahead of print.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Global Clinical Compliance study director
Ferring Pharmaceuticals
15 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Progesterone vaginal ring in people with Progesterone Supplementation in Women Undergoing ART, run by Ferring Pharmaceuticals at 15 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 15 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Nov 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cumulative Rate of Spontaneous Abortions Occurring on or Before 12 Weeks Post-oocyte Retrieval (time frame: On or before 12 weeks post-oocyte retrieval). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03565211, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Nov 2020.