Smoking CessationNCT03565796
Building Capacity and Promoting Smoking Cessation in the Community Via "Quit to Win" Contest 2018
A study testing Personalized active referral plus financial incentive, AWARD advice and Warning leaflet in people with Smoking Cessation, run by The University of Hong Kong at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
The present study will examine (1) the effectiveness of a combined intervention of face-to-face brief cessation advice (AWARD), active referral of SC service plus financial incentive on encouraging SC services use and (2) explore the use of CBPR model to build capacity and to engage community partners in taking on… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Smoking Cessation
- What is being tested?
- Personalized active referral plus financial incentive, AWARD advice and Warning leaflet
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,093 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 16 Jun 2018to 30 Jun 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Hong Kong residents aged 18 or above
- Smoke at least 1 cigarette per day in the past 3 months
- Able to communicate in Cantonese (including reading Chinese)
- Exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) 4 ppm or above, assessed by a validated CO smokerlyzer
- Intent to quit / reduce smoking
Who cannot join
- Smokers who have difficulties (either physical or cognitive condition) to communicate
- Currently following other smoking cessation programs
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site
Hong Kong Council on Smoking and Health (COSH)
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 852
About this study
Official title: Building Capacity and Promoting Smoking Cessation in the Community Via "Quit to Win" Contest 2018: a Single-blind Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial on Brief Intervention (AWARD), Active Referral and Financial Incentive for Attending Smoking Cessation (SC) Service to Increase Abstinence
The present study will examine (1) the effectiveness of a combined intervention of face-to-face brief cessation advice (AWARD), active referral of SC service plus financial incentive on encouraging SC services use and (2) explore the use of CBPR model to build capacity and to engage community partners in taking on this important public health issue for sustainability in the community. In addition, a process evaluation will be conducted to assess the effectiveness of the recruitment activity and how it is linked with the overall program outcomes.
Read the detailed description
Although smoking prevalence is decreasing in Hong Kong, there are still 615,000 daily cigarette smokers in Hong Kong in 2017 and half will be killed by smoking which accounts for over 7,000 deaths per year. Smoking also accounts for a large amount of medical cost, long-term care and productivity loss of US$688 million (0.6% Hong Kong GDP). Smoking is a highly addictive behavior and it is difficult for smokers with strong nicotine dependence to quit without assistance. On the other hand, reaching and helping the many smokers who have no intention to quit is a challenge, because they are unlikely to seek professional help from smoking cessation services.
The Quit and Win programme provides an opportunity to reach and encourage a large group of smokers to make quit attempt and maintain abstinence. The Quit and Win model posits that smokers participating in the contest will have higher motivation to quit with incentives and better social support. Studies have found that such quitting contests or incentive programs appeared to reach a large number of smokers and demonstrated a significantly higher quit rate for the quit and win group than for the control group.
SC services utilization rates are markedly low in Hong Kong. The latest Thematic Household Survey reported that only 3.3% daily smokers had ever used SC services. Among never-used smokers, only 3.1% of them were willing to try the SC services. The previous trial in QTW Contest 2016 depicts a similar pattern. Despite over three quarters of participants (77.0%) in the HAR group had chosen an SC service. Among them, only a small percentage (34.9%) actually used the SC service. Most smokers (65.1%) failed to attend the SC service under the HAR intervention. Consequently, better interventions are needed to extend the reach of SC services and smokers who had chosen an SC service but fail to attend.
The previous trial in QTW Contest 2013 showed a small cash incentive with early notifications increased quit attempt by self-directed help, but it did not increase abstinence and the use of formal cessation aids. Therefore, financial incentive-based SC programme focusing on promoting existing SC services use is warranted.
Therefore, the present study will examine (1) the effectiveness of a combined intervention of face-to-face brief cessation advice (AWARD), active referral of SC service plus financial incentive on encouraging SC services use and (2) explore the use of CBPR model to build capacity and to engage community partners in taking on this important public health issue for sustainability in the community. In addition, a process evaluation will be conducted to assess the effectiveness of the recruitment activity and how it is linked with the overall program outcomes.
- Conditions
- Smoking Cessation
- Being tested
- Personalized active referral plus financial incentive, AWARD advice, Warning leaflet, Referral card, COSH booklet
- Keywords
- Smoking cessation, Quit to Win, Brief intervention, Financial incentive, Active referral, AWARD model
- Medical subject headings
- Smoking Cessation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Personalized active referral plus financial incentiveBehavioural
Smokers will be introduced to various SC services in Hong Kong and be motivated to use the services.Written consents will be obtained from smokers who are ready to book the service onsite for transfer of their contact telephone numbers to their chosen service providers. Our research staff will transfer the information to the service providers within a week since the enrollment.Smokers are informed at baseline that they will receive financial incentive (supermarket coupon HK$300) if they attend or use any of the SC services within 3-month.
AWARD adviceBehavioural
Also called Ask, Warn, Advise, Refer, Do-it-again
Ask about smoking history, Warn about the high risk of smoking, Advise to quit as soon as possible, Refer to the smoking cessation services, and Do it again (if the smokers refused to set quit date).
Warning leafletBehavioural
Also called Brief leaflet on health warning and smoking cessation
The 2-sided color printed A4 leaflet, which systematically covers the most important messages to motivate smoking cessation
Referral cardBehavioural
Also called Smoking Cessation Service Card
The 3-folded "Smoking Cessation Services" card consists of brief information and highlights of existing smoking cessation services, contact methods, motivation information and strong supporting messages or slogans
COSH bookletBehavioural
Also called COSH self-help smoking cessation booklet
A general smoking cessation self-help booklet
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group A | Experimental | Personalized active referral plus financial incentive+ AWARD advice + referral card + warning leaflet+ COSH booklet Receives: Behavioral: Personalized active referral plus financial incentive; Behavioral: AWARD advice; Behavioral: Warning leaflet; Behavioral: Referral card; Behavioral: COSH booklet |
| Group B | Experimental | AWARD advice + COSH booklet Receives: Behavioral: AWARD advice; Behavioral: COSH booklet |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Biochemical validated quit rate
The primary outcomes are biochemically validated quit rates at 3-month in the two groups
Measured: 3-month follow-up
Biochemical validated quit rate
The primary outcomes are biochemically validated quit rates at 6-month in the two groups
Measured: 6-month follow-up
Secondary outcomes (10)
Smoking quit rate change from baseline at 3-month follow-up
Self-reported 7-day point prevalence (pp) quit rate at 3-month between the two groups
Measured: 3-month follow-up
Smoking quit rate change from baseline at 6-month follow-up
Self-reported 7-day point prevalence (pp) quit rate at 6-month between the two groups
Measured: 6-month follow-up
Smoking reduction rate change from baseline at 3-month follow-up
Rate of smoking reduction by at least half of baseline amount in the two groups
Measured: 3-month follow-up
Smoking reduction rate change from baseline at 6-month follow-up
Rate of smoking reduction by at least half of baseline amount in the two groups
Measured: 6-month follow-up
Smoking quit attempt change from baseline at 3-month follow-up
Number of quit attempts at 3-month in the two groups
Measured: 3-month follow-up
Smoking quit attempt change from baseline at 6-month follow-up
Number of quit attempts at 6-month in the two groups
Measured: 6-month follow-up
Quit rate for all subjects change from baseline at 3- and 6-month follow-up
the above cessation and reduction outcomes of all subjects participating in Quit to Win contest 2018
Measured: 3 and 6 months follow-up
Reduction rate for all subjects change from baseline at 3- and 6-month follow-up
the above cessation and reduction outcomes of all subjects participating in Quit to Win contest 2018
Measured: 3 and 6 months follow-up
Use of smoking cessation service
Use of smoking cessation at 3 and 6 month follow-up in the two groups
Measured: 3 and 6 months follow-up
Use of smoking cessation service for all subjects
Use of smoking cessation service for all subjects participating in Quit to Win contest 2018
Measured: 3 and 6 months follow-up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Jun 2018
- Study start16 Jun 2018
- Primary completion30 Jun 2019
- Study completion30 Jun 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Smoking CessationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The University of Hong KongThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 1,093 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Hong Kong
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Hong Kong Council on Smoking and Health
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr. Wang Man-Ping, The University of Hong Kong
- Investigators
- Man Ping Kelvin Wang, PhD, Principal investigator, The University of Hong Kong
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03565796
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- QTW 2018
- Status last verified
- Sep 2021
- First submitted
- 11 Jun 2018
- Last updated
- 21 Sep 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Zeng Y, Wu YS, Luk TT, Zhao SZ, Guo Z, Li Y, Tong HSC, Lai VWY, Cheung YTD, Lam TH, Wang MP. Quitting trajectories of Hong Kong Chinese smokers receiving behavioral smoking cessation interventions: A post hoc analysis of eight randomized controlled trials. Addiction. 2026 Jun;121(6):1568-1579. doi: 10.1111/add.70328. Epub 2026 Jan 17.
PubMed 41546550Weng X, Wu Y, Luk TT, Li WHC, Cheung DYT, Tong HSC, Lai V, Lam TH, Wang MP. Active referral plus a small financial incentive upon cessation services use on smoking abstinence: a community-based, cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2021 Jul 5;13:100189. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100189. eCollection 2021 Aug.
PubMed 34527982Weng X, Wang MP, Li HCW, Cheung YTD, Lau CY, Kwong ACS, Lai VWY, Chan SSC, Lam TH. Effects of active referral combined with a small financial incentive on smoking cessation: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 26;10(10):e038351. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038351.
PubMed 33109654Luk TT, Weng X, Wu YS, Chan HL, Lau CY, Kwong AC, Lai VW, Lam TH, Wang MP. Association of heated tobacco product use with smoking cessation in Chinese cigarette smokers in Hong Kong: a prospective study. Tob Control. 2021 Nov;30(6):653-659. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-055857. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
PubMed 32912861
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Sep 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Building Capacity and Promoting Smoking Cessation in the Community Via "Quit to Win" Contest 2018: a Single-blind Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial on Brief Intervention (AWARD), Active Referral and Financial Incentive for Attending Smoking Cessation (SC) Service to Increase Abstinence
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03565796
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- QTW 2018
- Conditions
- Smoking Cessation
- Keywords
- Smoking cessation, Quit to Win, Brief intervention, Financial incentive, Active referral, AWARD model
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,093 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Hong KongUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Hong Kong Council on Smoking and Health
- Study start
- 16 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The present study will examine (1) the effectiveness of a combined intervention of face-to-face brief cessation advice (AWARD), active referral of SC service plus financial incentive on encouraging SC services use and (2) explore the use of CBPR model to build capacity and to engage community partners in taking on this important public health issue for sustainability in the community. In addition, a process evaluation will be conducted to assess the effectiveness of the recruitment activity and how it is linked with the overall program outcomes.
Detailed description
Although smoking prevalence is decreasing in Hong Kong, there are still 615,000 daily cigarette smokers in Hong Kong in 2017 and half will be killed by smoking which accounts for over 7,000 deaths per year. Smoking also accounts for a large amount of medical cost, long-term care and productivity loss of US$688 million (0.6% Hong Kong GDP). Smoking is a highly addictive behavior and it is difficult for smokers with strong nicotine dependence to quit without assistance. On the other hand, reaching and helping the many smokers who have no intention to quit is a challenge, because they are unlikely to seek professional help from smoking cessation services.
The Quit and Win programme provides an opportunity to reach and encourage a large group of smokers to make quit attempt and maintain abstinence. The Quit and Win model posits that smokers participating in the contest will have higher motivation to quit with incentives and better social support. Studies have found that such quitting contests or incentive programs appeared to reach a large number of smokers and demonstrated a significantly higher quit rate for the quit and win group than for the control group.
SC services utilization rates are markedly low in Hong Kong. The latest Thematic Household Survey reported that only 3.3% daily smokers had ever used SC services. Among never-used smokers, only 3.1% of them were willing to try the SC services. The previous trial in QTW Contest 2016 depicts a similar pattern. Despite over three quarters of participants (77.0%) in the HAR group had chosen an SC service. Among them, only a small percentage (34.9%) actually used the SC service. Most smokers (65.1%) failed to attend the SC service under the HAR intervention. Consequently, better interventions are needed to extend the reach of SC services and smokers who had chosen an SC service but fail to attend.
The previous trial in QTW Contest 2013 showed a small cash incentive with early notifications increased quit attempt by self-directed help, but it did not increase abstinence and the use of formal cessation aids. Therefore, financial incentive-based SC programme focusing on promoting existing SC services use is warranted.
Therefore, the present study will examine (1) the effectiveness of a combined intervention of face-to-face brief cessation advice (AWARD), active referral of SC service plus financial incentive on encouraging SC services use and (2) explore the use of CBPR model to build capacity and to engage community partners in taking on this important public health issue for sustainability in the community. In addition, a process evaluation will be conducted to assess the effectiveness of the recruitment activity and how it is linked with the overall program outcomes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group A | Experimental | Behavioral: Personalized active referral plus financial incentive, Behavioral: AWARD advice, Behavioral: Warning leaflet, Behavioral: Referral card, Behavioral: COSH bookletPersonalized active referral plus financial incentive+ AWARD advice + referral card + warning leaflet+ COSH booklet |
| Group B | Experimental | Behavioral: AWARD advice, Behavioral: COSH bookletAWARD advice + COSH booklet |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Hong Kong residents aged 18 or above
- Smoke at least 1 cigarette per day in the past 3 months
- Able to communicate in Cantonese (including reading Chinese)
- Exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) 4 ppm or above, assessed by a validated CO smokerlyzer
- Intent to quit / reduce smoking
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Smokers who have difficulties (either physical or cognitive condition) to communicate
- Currently following other smoking cessation programs
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Personalized active referral plus financial incentiveSmokers will be introduced to various SC services in Hong Kong and be motivated to use the services.Written consents will be obtained from smokers who are ready to book the service onsite for transfer of their contact telephone numbers to their chosen service providers. Our research staff will transfer the information to the service providers within a week since the enrollment.Smokers are informed at baseline that they will receive financial incentive (supermarket coupon HK$300) if they attend or use any of the SC services within 3-month. | Behavioural | Group A |
| AWARD adviceAlso: Ask, Warn, Advise, Refer, Do-it-againAsk about smoking history, Warn about the high risk of smoking, Advise to quit as soon as possible, Refer to the smoking cessation services, and Do it again (if the smokers refused to set quit date). | Behavioural | Group A, Group B |
| Warning leafletAlso: Brief leaflet on health warning and smoking cessationThe 2-sided color printed A4 leaflet, which systematically covers the most important messages to motivate smoking cessation | Behavioural | Group A |
| Referral cardAlso: Smoking Cessation Service CardThe 3-folded "Smoking Cessation Services" card consists of brief information and highlights of existing smoking cessation services, contact methods, motivation information and strong supporting messages or slogans | Behavioural | Group A |
| COSH bookletAlso: COSH self-help smoking cessation bookletA general smoking cessation self-help booklet | Behavioural | Group A, Group B |
Primary outcome
Biochemical validated quit rate
Time frame: 3-month follow-up
The primary outcomes are biochemically validated quit rates at 3-month in the two groups
Biochemical validated quit rate
Time frame: 6-month follow-up
The primary outcomes are biochemically validated quit rates at 6-month in the two groups
10 secondary outcomes
Smoking quit rate change from baseline at 3-month follow-up
Time frame: 3-month follow-up
Smoking quit rate change from baseline at 6-month follow-up
Time frame: 6-month follow-up
Smoking reduction rate change from baseline at 3-month follow-up
Time frame: 3-month follow-up
Smoking reduction rate change from baseline at 6-month follow-up
Time frame: 6-month follow-up
Smoking quit attempt change from baseline at 3-month follow-up
Time frame: 3-month follow-up
Smoking quit attempt change from baseline at 6-month follow-up
Time frame: 6-month follow-up
Quit rate for all subjects change from baseline at 3- and 6-month follow-up
Time frame: 3 and 6 months follow-up
Reduction rate for all subjects change from baseline at 3- and 6-month follow-up
Time frame: 3 and 6 months follow-up
Use of smoking cessation service
Time frame: 3 and 6 months follow-up
Use of smoking cessation service for all subjects
Time frame: 3 and 6 months follow-up
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Sep 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41546550Zeng Y, Wu YS, Luk TT, Zhao SZ, Guo Z, Li Y, Tong HSC, Lai VWY, Cheung YTD, Lam TH, Wang MP. Quitting trajectories of Hong Kong Chinese smokers receiving behavioral smoking cessation interventions: A post hoc analysis of eight randomized controlled trials. Addiction. 2026 Jun;121(6):1568-1579. doi: 10.1111/add.70328. Epub 2026 Jan 17.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34527982Weng X, Wu Y, Luk TT, Li WHC, Cheung DYT, Tong HSC, Lai V, Lam TH, Wang MP. Active referral plus a small financial incentive upon cessation services use on smoking abstinence: a community-based, cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2021 Jul 5;13:100189. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100189. eCollection 2021 Aug.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33109654Weng X, Wang MP, Li HCW, Cheung YTD, Lau CY, Kwong ACS, Lai VWY, Chan SSC, Lam TH. Effects of active referral combined with a small financial incentive on smoking cessation: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 26;10(10):e038351. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038351.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32912861Luk TT, Weng X, Wu YS, Chan HL, Lau CY, Kwong AC, Lai VW, Lam TH, Wang MP. Association of heated tobacco product use with smoking cessation in Chinese cigarette smokers in Hong Kong: a prospective study. Tob Control. 2021 Nov;30(6):653-659. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-055857. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Smoking Cessation
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Using Smartwatches to Monitor Smoking in Real-life Situations
Smoking
Not yet recruitingObservational study
PROMETHEE: A Shared Interregional Tele-Tobacco Cessation Platform Embedded Within the IMPULSION Lung Cancer Screening Program
Smoking Cessation, Lung Cancer Screening
Not yet recruiting
Impacto 2.0: Mobile Smoking Cessation Across Texas
Cigarette Smoking, Smoking Cessation
Not yet recruiting
Smoking Cessation Program for Lao People With HIV
Smoking Cessation, HIV
RecruitingPhase 3
Studying NMDA and Sigma-1 in Smoking Cessation Treatment (SUMMIT)
Smoking Cessation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Man Ping Kelvin Wang, PhD principal investigator
The University of Hong Kong
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Personalized active referral plus financial incentive, AWARD advice and Warning leaflet in people with Smoking Cessation, run by The University of Hong Kong at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Sep 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Biochemical validated quit rate (time frame: 3-month follow-up). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03565796, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Sep 2021.