AzTrials
AzTrials

Physical TherapyNCT03566251

Core Stability, Trunk Position Sense, Balance and Functional Mobility in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis

A study testing Balance, Functional mobility and Core stability in people with Physical Therapy, run by Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to compare balance, functional mobility, core stability and trunk position sense in patients with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS) and healthy controls and investigate the relationship between core stability and trunk position sense with balance and functional mobility in PwMS. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Physical Therapy
What is being tested?
Balance, Functional mobility and Core stability
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
74 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
1 May 2016to 1 Feb 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Clinical diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis Disease
  • Must be able to walk independently
  • The level of disability should be between 0.5-4 according to EDSS

Who cannot join

  • Having acute attack (three months prior to the study)
  • Having vision and circulatory system problems,
  • Orthopedic problems and pain in the spine, hip, knee or ankle
  • Mini-Mental State Examination Test score of less than 25 points

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Etlik, Ankara, Turkey, 06010

    Ankara

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: The Investigation of the Relationship Between Core Stability and Trunk Position Sense With Balance and Functional Mobility in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis

The aim of this study is to compare balance, functional mobility, core stability and trunk position sense in patients with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS) and healthy controls and investigate the relationship between core stability and trunk position sense with balance and functional mobility in PwMS.

Balance and mobility disorders are seen in various degrees in patients with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS). Balance and mobility impairments are observed in the beginning with the early period and are one of the most common causes of disability in PwMS.

Read more

Coordination between the peripheral sensory system, the central sensory-motor system and the musculoskeletal system which generates motor responses is required to provide balance. If one or more of these systems do not function properly, this results in deficiency in trunk stability and also causes balance and mobility disorders.

It has been shown that balance and mobility disorders are mostly associated with loss of strength, spasticity, coordination disorders and sensory loss. Especially, it is known that strength of core are related to balance and mobility. Although core muscle strength is a significant element of trunk stability, position sense is also responsible for trunk stability. When literature is examined, there is no study which examines the relationship between balance and mobility with core muscles' strength and trunk position sense in PwMS. For all these reasons, we think that balance and functional mobility may be related to core stability and trunk position sense in PwMS

Read the detailed description

Our study was carried out with the purpose of comparing balance, functional mobility, core stability and trunk position sense in PwMS and healthy controls and investigating the relationship between core stability and trunk position sense with balance and functional mobility in PwMS.

45 PwMS and 29 healthy volunteers with matching ages and genders were included the study. Balance was assessed by Biodex Biosway Portable Balance System (Biodex Medical Systems Inc., Shirley, New York). Timed Up and Go (TUG) tests were used to evaluate functional mobility. Core endurance and core strength, which are two specific components of core stability, were evaluated separately. Trunk flexor, trunk extensor, right and left side bridge and prone bridge tests were applied to assess the endurance of the core muscles. The power of core muscles was evaluated with sit-ups and modified push-ups tests. Trunk position sense was evaluated by the trunk reposition test with Dualer IQ digital inclinometer (J-TECH medical, Salt Lake City, UK, USA).

Being tested
Balance, Functional mobility, Core stability, Trunk position sense
Keywords
Multiple Sclerosis, Balance, Core Stability, Proprioception, Functional Mobility
Medical subject headings
Multiple Sclerosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BalanceOther

    Balance was assessed by Biodex Biosway Portable Balance System (Biodex Medical Systems Inc., Shirley, New York). Postural Stability (PS), Limits of Stability (LOS) and Modified Sensory Organization Tests (MSOT) were evaluated with this system. PS test assesses static balance during standing up by the ability to hold the center of gravity on the support surface. The test was performed on both feet and on the left and right foot separately. LOS test assesses how much the center of gravity is displaced on the support surface without losing balance during the standing position. MSOT assesses the effects of somatosensory, visual and vestibular senses on postural control during the standing position. It evaluates the sensory component of balance in two different visual conditions and on two different support surfaces.

  • Functional mobilityOther

    Timed Up and Go (TUG) tests were used to evaluate functional mobility. The TUG measures the time it takes a subject to stand up from an armchair, walk a distance of 3 m, turn, walk back to the chair and sit down. Time was recorded in seconds with a stopwatch.

  • Core stabilityOther

    Core endurance and core strength, which are two specific components of core stability, were evaluated separately. Trunk flexor, trunk extensor, right and left side bridge and prone bridge tests were applied to assess the endurance of the core muscles. Tests were terminated when the subjects said they could not continue the test or when the test position was broken. A stopwatch was used for the measurements and the results were recorded in seconds. The power of core muscles was evaluated with sit-ups and modified push-ups tests. It was recorded how many times the subject could do each test for 30 seconds. The tests were repeated twice and the best measurement score was recorded for use in the statistical analyses.

  • Trunk position senseOther

    Trunk position sense was evaluated by the trunk reposition test with Dualer IQ digital inclinometer (J-TECH medical, Salt Lake City, UK, USA). Measurements were made in two levels: lumbosacral (LS) and thoracosacral (TS) regions. The testing took place while standing under three visual-surface conditions. Participants flexed the trunk approximately 30° in the sagittal plane, holding the position for a count of 3 seconds (position 1) and then participants attempted to repeat the previously attained angle. Participants indicated verbally when they felt they had reached the angle and held their position for a count of 3 seconds (position 2). The absolute difference in degrees between positions 1 and 2 was defined as the trunk reposition error (TRE) degree. Participants generated five scores for each visual-surface condition. For each condition, the highest and lowest scores were discarded and the mean of the remaining three scores represented the TRE score

Study groups in NCT03566251
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Multiple SclerosisExperimentalPatients with confirmed diagnosis of clinically definite MS, Expanded Sisability Status Scale range of 0.5-4 who are able to walk independently.
Receives: Other: Balance; Other: Functional mobility; Other: Core stability; Other: Trunk position sense
Healthy individualsNo intervention29 healthy volunteers with matching ages and genders

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Balance

    Balance was assessed by Biodex Biosway Portable Balance System (Biodex Medical Systems Inc., Shirley, New York). Postural Stability was evaluated with this system (Biodex Medical Systems, 2009). Postural Stability test was performed on both feet and on the left and right foot separately. Total stability index score was obtained as the test result.

    Measured: 1 month

  2. Balance

    Balance was assessed by Biodex Biosway Portable Balance System (Biodex Medical Systems Inc., Shirley, New York). Limits of Stability was evaluated with this system (Biodex Medical Systems, 2009). Limits of Stability test assesses how much the center of gravity is displaced on the support surface without losing balance during the standing position. Total direction control score was obtained as the test result.

    Measured: 1 month

  3. Balance

    Balance was assessed by Biodex Biosway Portable Balance System (Biodex Medical Systems Inc., Shirley, New York). Modified Sensory Organization Tests were evaluated with this system (Biodex Medical Systems, 2009). MSOT assesses the effects of somatosensory, visual and vestibular senses on postural control during the standing position. It evaluates the sensory component of balance in two different visual conditions and on two different support surfaces; condition 1: eyes open-firm surface, condition 2: eyes closed-firm surface, condition 3: eyes open-foam surface and condition 4: eyes closed-foam surface. Stability index scores were obtained as the test result

    Measured: 1 month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Jun 2018
  2. Study start1 May 2016
  3. Primary completion1 Jan 2017
  4. Study completion1 Feb 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Factorial
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
74 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03566251
Sponsor's protocol ID
228
Status last verified
Jul 2021
First submitted
11 Jun 2018
Last updated
14 Jul 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Balance, Functional mobility and Core stability in people with Physical Therapy, run by Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Balance (time frame: 1 month). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jul 2021; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 30 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in