Disability PhysicalNCT03567239
Impact of Custom Assistive and Adaptive Technology in Rehabilitation
A study testing Using adaptive device. in people with Disability Physical and Brain Injuries, run by Madonna Rehabilitation Hospital at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Madonna's Rehabilitation Engineering Center of Excellence (REC) is continually developing custom devices for persons with disabilities. These devices are created to improve the independence of individuals living with disabilities at Madonna Rehabilitation Hospitals and in the community. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 year to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Disability Physical, Brain Injuries, Stroke
- What is being tested?
- Using adaptive device.
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 5 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 25 Jun 2018to 26 Feb 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 year to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Madonna Inpatient or Outpatient
- Disability
- Have need requiring assistive device or adaptation to device not currently on commercial market
Who cannot join
- None.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Madonna Rehabilitation Hospitals
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68506
About this study
Official title: Evaluating the Impact of Custom Assistive and Adaptive Technology
Madonna's Rehabilitation Engineering Center of Excellence (REC) is continually developing custom devices for persons with disabilities. These devices are created to improve the independence of individuals living with disabilities at Madonna Rehabilitation Hospitals and in the community. The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact custom assistive and adaptive devices have on patient independence, quality of life, and experience at Madonna Rehabilitation Hospitals.
Read the detailed description
Rehabilitation engineering is a relatively new field that encompasses many diverse disciplines in engineering, technology, and medicine. Many hospitals do not have a rehabilitation engineering department and their patients are limited to products that are commercially available. These products are often very expensive and not ideal for the user.
Each individual has unique needs. The REC at Madonna Rehabilitation Hospitals (MRH), as well as other RECs around the world, are focused on efficiently developing novel devices for specific patient needs and creating robust modifications to existing technologies to redirect something designed for the "average" person into something that is customized to the individual.
At Madonna this service is important for individuals with disabilities. Thus, the purpose of this work is to seek input/feedback from end-users regarding the impact of the adaptive device on their function, independence, and quality of life. The investigators expect that the feedback received may guide future design integrations and will document the impact of such services on individuals with disabilities and their caregivers and clinicians. The main goal is that this feedback will demonstrate how a REC, such as the one at MRH, impacts patients' lives and therefore improves patients' outcomes. Enhanced patient outcome measures are valued by all hospitals, and therefore may encourage other hospitals to establish a REC. Additionally, feedback recorded from participants could be integrated into presentations and publications aimed at knowledge dissemination to communities of interest.
Per current REC and MRH procedures, each patient will utilize a device designed or adapted by a rehabilitation engineer within the REC with input from both patient and clinician, along with other relevant experts. These adaptive devices are expected to vary widely and may include items such as toileting tools (for bowel and bladder control), assistive transfer devices, and electronic devices for environmental control.
Individuals in MRH's inpatient and outpatient programs provide care for individuals with a diverse range and level of disabilities. Approximately 2-3 patients each week receive a custom built assistive device to increase their independence and/or hasten their recovery.
A MRH research staff member will meet with the potential participant after the patient has received the requested REC assistive or adaptive device and have indicated to their therapist that they would like to learn more about the study. The participant and a legal guardian (if appropriate) will be asked to fill out the informed consent/assent, Authorization to Disclose Health Information (to assist in understanding the participant's diagnosis and other potential health problems), and photo/video consent.
Information about relevant functional activities (e.g. feeding, transfers, ambulation) are quantified using functional independence and assessment measures (FIM/FAM scores) while the participant is at MRH. FIM(Functional Independence Measure)/FAM(Functional Assessment Measure) scores may be requested from the participant's primary therapist (if the participant allows via the Authorization to Disclose Health Information) for areas that would be influenced by the use of the assistive or adaptive device (e.g., if a device is built to assist a patient in transferring, scores in relation to the Car transfer category may be requested). These scores may be requested for the most recent date prior to receiving the device, when the patient discharges, and periodically throughout their time at Madonna (e.g., daily scores may be requested to help determine the learning curve required to utilize the device).
As part of this study, the participant will meet with a member of the MRH research staff again after using the assistive device for at least 2 days (maximum of 30 days). As appropriate, individuals utilizing the assistive devices (or their designated respondent if unable to personally respond) will also be asked to complete one or more qualitative and quantitative questionnaires to help understand the impact of the adaptive device on their function, independence, and quality of life. Then each participant will be asked to identify the specific need the device addresses and will rate on a 7-point Likert scale how effective the adaptive device is at addressing the specific need. The clinician or a caregiver may also be asked to complete one or more of the questionnaires while thinking about how the assistive device affects their patient/loved one. Qualitative comments and ratings will be collected on the perceived potential value, ease of use, acceptability, and preference for the device.
Individual patient outcomes will be evaluated as well as similar devices that are utilized for different patients and diagnosis will be compared. Data will also be evaluated with regard to diagnosis and type of assistive device (i.e., toileting, transfer, technology access, etc.) to help understand what types of devices certain populations are lacking. Quantitative data will be analyzed through descriptive, parametric, and nonparametric statistics, as appropriate.
- Conditions
- Disability Physical, Brain Injuries, Stroke, Spinal Cord Injuries, Multiple Sclerosis, Paralysis
- Being tested
- Using adaptive device.
- Keywords
- Rehabilitation Engineering, Adaptive Devices, Assistive Technology
- Medical subject headings
- Brain Injuries, Stroke, Spinal Cord Injuries, Multiple Sclerosis, Paralysis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Using adaptive device.Device
Participant uses the specially designed device for a specified length of time (no less than two days) and feedback is then gathered from the participant through questionnaires. These questionnaires include NASA-TLX, PIADS, QUEST, and a single question asking if the device improved their ability to address their specific need.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Using adaptive device | Experimental | Participants will use a non-commercially available device, designed to meet their needs. Receives: Device: Using adaptive device. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The PIADS (Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices) Mean Score
The PIADS (Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices) questionnaire will be completed by each participant giving feedback on how use of the device impacts 26 different aspects of their life. These 26 questions are answered on a scale of -3 to 3 and are broken into three subscales (Competence, Adaptability, and Self-Esteem). Depending on the question 3 may be most positive, or -3 may be most positive. Through how the PIADS responses are added together, subscales result in a range of -3 to 3 with 3 being the most positive. Details on this questionnaire and how the results are calculated can be found here: https://piads.at/
Each participant will also identify the specific need the device addresses and will rate on a 7-point Likert scale how effective the adaptive device is at addressing that need. This ranged from 1-7 with 7 being the most positive.
Measured: 2-30 days after receiving device.
Secondary outcomes (2)
Workload
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration - Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) questionnaire will be completed by each participant giving feedback on how demanding the device is mentally, physically, etc. There are six subscales withing the NASA-TLX - Mental Demand, Physical Demand, Temporal Demand, Performance, Effort, and Frustration. Each subscale has 21 gradations with 1 being the best and 21 being the worst. The overall index for each participant was an average of their six subscales.
Measured: 2-30 days after receiving device.
QUEST Questionnaire Form Scores
The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST) questionnaire will be completed by each participant giving feedback on how satisfied they are with the device and the related services they experienced. This questionnaire included a total of 12 questions, each question was answered on a scale of 1-5 with 1=Not satisfied at all, 5=Very satisfied. The higher the score the better the outcome. Eight of these questions were related to the Device subscale. Four were related to the Services subscale. An Overall score was given taking the average response from ALL 12 questions for each participant. A higher the number on the 1-5 scale indicates a better outcome.
Measured: 2-30 days after receiving device.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Jun 2018
- Study start25 Jun 2018
- Primary completion1 Sep 2019
- Study completion26 Feb 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Disability PhysicalStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Participants receive adaptive device and provide feedback.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 5 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Madonna Rehabilitation Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Chase Pfeifer, Madonna Rehabilitation Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03567239
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 17-009-FB
- Status last verified
- Nov 2024
- First submitted
- 23 May 2018
- Last updated
- 25 Nov 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Brod M, Tesler LE, Christensen TL. Qualitative research and content validity: developing best practices based on science and experience. Qual Life Res. 2009 Nov;18(9):1263-78. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9. Epub 2009 Sep 27.
PubMed 19784865Cook, A. M., & Gray, D. B. (2017, May 12). Assistive Technology. Retrieved July 10, 2017, from Encyclopædia Britannica website: http://www.britannica.com/topic/assistive-technology
Day, H., & Jutai, J. (1996). Measuring the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices: the PIADS*. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation, 9(2), 159-168.
Day H, Jutai J, Campbell KA. Development of a scale to measure the psychosocial impact of assistive devices: lessons learned and the road ahead. Disabil Rehabil. 2002 Jan 10-Feb 15;24(1-3):31-7. doi: 10.1080/09638280110066343.
PubMed 11827152Demers, L., Weiss-Lambrou, R., & Ska, B. (2002). The Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST 2.0): An overview and recent progress. Technology and Disability, 14, 101-105.
Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Advances in psychology, 52, 139-183.
Jutai, J., & Day, H. (2002). The assessment of assistive technology outcomes, effects and costs. Technology and Disability, 14(3), 107-111.
United States, Congress, House. Assistive Technology Act. Government Printing Office, 2004. 108th Congress, House Document publ364.108
World Health Organization. (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. World Health Organization
Brault, M. W. (2012). Americans with disabilities: 2010 (pp. 1-23). Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, US Census Bureau.