AzTrials
AzTrials

Colo-rectal CancerNCT03567850

Problem Solving Skills Training in Adult Cancer Survivors: Bright IDEAS-AC

A study testing Problem solving Skills Training in people with Colo-rectal Cancer, run by Roswell Park Cancer Institute at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this 2-year study will assess the acceptability and feasibility of offering Problem Solving Skills Therapy (PSST) to cancer survivors and their caregivers focusing on the highest risk patients with distress. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Colo-rectal Cancer
What is being tested?
Problem solving Skills Training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
19 Oct 2018to 9 Mar 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • stage I-III Colorectal Cancer, Breast, Bladder or Prostate Cancer
  • meet the screening criteria for psychological distress (NCCN Distress >2)
  • be able to speak English
  • have a 5-year survival rate of 50% or greater as deemed by their oncologist, surgeon,or other relevant attending physician (suggesting a reasonable rate of cure or prolonged medical survival with state-of-the-art medical care)
  • be willing to provide written informed consent to participate in the study which includes several clinical evaluations, provide access to medical records/PCP, and allow all interviews and PSST therapy sessions to be audiotaped.
  • Among patients treated in the urban centers, we will specifically target patients who live more than 40 miles away from the clinic as they are more likely to experience problems with access to care.
  • Age 21 or older

Who cannot join

  • a diagnosis of mental retardation,
  • and/or acute suicidal behavior

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Roswell Park Cancer Institute

    Buffalo, New York, 14263

Other trials in United States

About this study

The aim of this 2-year study will assess the acceptability and feasibility of offering Problem Solving Skills Therapy (PSST) to cancer survivors and their caregivers focusing on the highest risk patients with distress.

Read the detailed description

At Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, in collaboration with the University at Buffalo School of Public Health and Health Professions and the University of Rochester, we are looking for adult cancer patients to participate in our new project designed to facilitate recovery from cancer and help cancer survivors lead better, more productive lives. The ideal subjects are individuals who have completed treatment for stage I-III cancer and speak English. Participants will be randomized into two groups: 8 weekly 1-hour long sessions of problem solving skills therapy delivered by a trained therapist vs. care as usual. Bright IDEAS Adult Cancer (Bright IDEAS-AC) therapy will be delivered in the most patient-friendly way. Sessions will be face-to-face at the location of patient choice (hospital, clinic, or participant's home) or over the phone. A supportive other or caregiver is also invited to participate in this study. This project does not involve any experimental drugs and does not affect the regular care or patient relationship with doctor(s).

At the time of enrollment, after 3 months and after 6 months, all participants in the intervention and control arms, as well as any participating supportive others/caregivers will be asked about their healthcare utilization since the last assessment including primary care, specialist and emergency department visits and any hospital stays. During the same three time points, both patients and supportive others/caregivers will be asked to fill in 4 short questionnaires assessing their problem solving skills, health status, mood and function

Being tested
Problem solving Skills Training
Medical subject headings
Colonic Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Problem solving Skills TrainingBehavioural

    Participants will be encouraged to identify specific problems particularly relevant to them and to their family's situation (instead of providing them with standardized examples) to be discussed and "solved" during the PSST sessions. The eight sessions of PSST will be organized in a systematized, therapeutic manner. Session 1 will be face-to-face and devoted to rapport building and understanding relevant social and medical information. The therapist (RA) will introduce PSST and the Bright IDEAS paradigm, present worksheets to guide PSST homework assignments, and give an overview of subsequent sessions. Starting at session 2, participants will continue training over the phone, with the same general structure and format. In sessions 2-7, the therapist and patient, with a supportive other (SO) if available, will review the patient's identified problems and work on application of problem-solving strategies and skills learned earlier.

Study groups in NCT03567850
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
InterventionExperimentalParticipants assigned to the intervention arm will receive Problem Solving Skills Training (PSST) consisting of eight one-hour individual weekly sessions.
Receives: Behavioral: Problem solving Skills Training
Control ArmActive comparatorCare As Usual Group (CAU): Participants randomized to the CAU group will be observed under naturalistic conditions. Both PSST and CAU participants and their clinicians (PCP and oncology providers) will be allowed to use any clinically appropriate medical and behavioral care without restriction (e.g., care management, rehabilitation, behavioral therapy, palliative care) or refer patients to social and community services (e.g., peer support, county cancer services program or aging services). The CAU participants will undergo the same evaluation protocol as the PSST group
Receives: Behavioral: Problem solving Skills Training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mean Physical Health of Patient at Enrollment

    From all patients in the intervention and control arms, we will collect patient on physical health using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - disease specific.

    FACT-G is a 27-item questionnaire designed to measure four domains of health-related quality of life in cancer patients based on the past 7 days: physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being (score range is 1-108; higher scores indicate better quality of life). The scale's ability to discriminate patients on the basis of performance status and hospitalization status supports its sensitivity. It has also demonstrated sensitivity to change over time. Differences of 5-7 points are considered clinically significant.

    Measured: At enrollment

  2. Behavioral Health of Patient

    From all patients in the intervention and control arms, we will collect patient self-report data on problem solving skills,using the Social Problem-Solving Inventory-Revised (SPSI-R)

    SPSI-R is a 25-item self-report tool linked to a multidimensional model of problem-solving skills. SPSI-R:S has been demonstrated to have strong reliability and validity estimates. The scale includes 5 sub-scales grouped into two decision-making styles: constructive (Positive Problem Orientation and Rational Problem Solving) and dysfunctional (Negative Problem Orientation, Impulsivity/ Carelessness, and Avoidance). Each subscale and the total SPSI-R:S scores are expressed on a 0-20 scale; higher scores indicate better skills.

    Measured: At time of enrollment

  3. Mean Change in Physical Health From Baseline to 3-months

    From all patients in the intervention and control arms, we will collect patient on physical health using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Disease Specific (FACT)

    FACT-G is a 27-item questionnaire designed to measure four domains of health-related quality of life in cancer patients based on the past 7 days: physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being (score range is 1-108; higher scores indicate better quality of life). The scale's ability to discriminate patients on the basis of performance status and hospitalization status supports its sensitivity. It has also demonstrated sensitivity to change over time. Differences of 5-7 points are considered clinically significant.

    The mean change was calculated as the difference between the 3-month measurement and the baseline measurement.

    Measured: At 3 months

  4. Mean Change Physical Health of Patient at 12 Months

    From all patients in the intervention and control arms, we will collect patient on physical health using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)

    FACT-G is a 27-item questionnaire designed to measure four domains of health-related quality of life in cancer patients based on the past 7 days: physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being (score range is 1-108; higher scores indicate better quality of life). The scale's ability to discriminate patients on the basis of performance status and hospitalization status supports its sensitivity. It has also demonstrated sensitivity to change over time. Differences of 5-7 points are considered clinically significant.

    Measured: At 12 months

  5. Mean Change in Behavioral Health of Patient at 3 Months

    From all patients in the intervention and control arms, we will collect patient self-report data on problem solving skills,using the Social Problem-Solving Inventory-Revised (SPSI-R)

    SPSI-R is a 25-item self-report tool linked to a multidimensional model of problem-solving skills. SPSI-R:S has been demonstrated to have strong reliability and validity estimates. The scale includes 5 sub-scales grouped into two decision-making styles: constructive (Positive Problem Orientation and Rational Problem Solving) and dysfunctional (Negative Problem Orientation, Impulsivity/ Carelessness, and Avoidance). Each subscale and the total SPSI-R:S scores are expressed on a 0-20 scale; higher scores indicate better skills.

    Measured: At 3 months

  6. Mean Change in Behavioral Health of Patient at 12 Months

    From all patients in the intervention and control arms, we will collect patient self-report data on problem solving skills,using the Social Problem-Solving Inventory-Revised (SPSI-R)

    SPSI-R is a 25-item self-report tool linked to a multidimensional model of problem-solving skills. SPSI-R:S has been demonstrated to have strong reliability and validity estimates. The scale includes 5 sub-scales grouped into two decision-making styles: constructive (Positive Problem Orientation and Rational Problem Solving) and dysfunctional (Negative Problem Orientation, Impulsivity/ Carelessness, and Avoidance). Each subscale and the total SPSI-R:S scores are expressed on a 0-20 scale; higher scores indicate better skills.

    Measured: At 12 months

  7. Healthcare Utilization of Patients

    From all patients in the intervention and control arms, we will collect patient self-report data by asking the patients about their healthcare utilization since the last study assessment including primary care, specialist and ED visits, use of supportive services and any hospital stays.

    Measured: At 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Jun 2018
  2. Study start19 Oct 2018
  3. Primary completion9 Mar 2021
  4. Study completion9 Mar 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
50 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03567850
Sponsor's protocol ID
I 65518
Status last verified
Sep 2022
First submitted
31 May 2018
Last updated
28 Sep 2022
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Noyes K, Zapf AL, Depner RM, Flores T, Huston A, Rashid HH, McNeal D, Constine LS, Fleming FJ, Wilding GE, Sahler OJZ. Problem-solving skills training in adult cancer survivors: Bright IDEAS-AC pilot study. Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2022;31:100552. doi: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2022.100552. Epub 2022 Mar 25.

    PubMed 35358820

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Problem solving Skills Training in people with Colo-rectal Cancer, run by Roswell Park Cancer Institute at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Sep 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Sep 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mean Physical Health of Patient at Enrollment (time frame: At enrollment). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03567850, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Sep 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in