AzTrials
AzTrials

Follicular LymphomaPhase 2ELARANCT03568461

Efficacy and Safety of Tisagenlecleucel in Adult Patients With Refractory or Relapsed Follicular Lymphoma

A Phase 2 study testing tisagenlecleucel in people with Follicular Lymphoma, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 30 sites in 12 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a multi-center, phase II study to determine the efficacy and safety of tisagenlecleucel in adult patients with relapsed or refractory FL. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 100 years
Conditions the study is for
Follicular Lymphoma
What is being tested?
tisagenlecleucel
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
98 participants
Where
30 sitesin 12 countries
Study dates
12 Nov 2018to 28 May 2025
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 100 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Refractory or relapsed Follicular Lymphoma (Grade 1, 2, 3A)
  • Radiographically measurable disease at screening

Who cannot join

  • Evidence of histologic transformation
  • Follicular Lymphoma Grade 3B
  • Prior anti-CD19 therapy
  • Prior gene therapy
  • Prior adoptive T cell therapy
  • Prior allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant
  • Active CNS involvement by malignancy
  • Other protocol-defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.

Trial locations and contacts

30 sites in 12 countries.

30 sites in 12 countries

United States9 sites
  • Michigan Med University of Michigan

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109 5271

  • Uni of Chi Medi Ctr Hema and Onco

    Chicago, Illinois, 60637

  • City of Hope National Medical Center

    Duarte, California, 91010 3000

  • MD Anderson Cancer Center

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Univ of Kansas Hosp and Med Ctr

    Kansas City, Kansas, 66160

  • University of Pennsylvania Clinical

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

  • Oregon Health Sciences University

    Portland, Oregon, 97239

  • UCSF Medical Center

    San Francisco, California, 94143

  • H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute

    Tampa, Florida, 33612

Other trials in United States

Australia3 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Camperdown, New South Wales, 2050

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Herston, QLD 4006

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Melbourne, Victoria, 3000

Other trials in Australia

Germany3 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, 50937

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Munich, Bavaria, 81377

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Ulm, 89081

Other trials in Germany

Japan3 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Fukuoka, 8128582

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8648

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Sendai, Miyagi, 9808574

Other trials in Japan

France2 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Paris, 75475

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Pierre-Bénite, 69495

Other trials in France

Italy2 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Bologna, BO, 40138

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Milan, MI, 20132

Other trials in Italy

Spain2 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Madrid, 28041

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Seville, 41013

Other trials in Spain

United Kingdom2 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Birmingham, West Midlands, B15 2TH

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    London, SE5 9RS

Other trials in United Kingdom

Austria1 site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Linz, 4020

Other trials in Austria

Belgium1 site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Ghent, 9000

Other trials in Belgium

Netherlands1 site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Amsterdam, North Holland, 1081 HV

Other trials in Netherlands

Norway1 site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Oslo, Norway, 0310

Other trials in Norway

About this study

Official title: A Phase II, Single Arm, Multicenter Open Label Trial to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Tisagenlecleucel (CTL019) in Adult Patients With Refractory or Relapsed Follicular Lymphoma

This is a multi-center, phase II study to determine the efficacy and safety of tisagenlecleucel in adult patients with relapsed or refractory FL.

Read the detailed description

This single-arm, open label study had the following sequential phases: Screening, Pretreatment, Treatment and Follow-up. In the Pre-treatment phase, the patient could undergo bridging therapy (optional) and lymphodepleting (LD) chemotherapy. Treatment and Follow-up Phase included tisagenlecleucel infusion, and safety and efficacy follow-up for at least 24 months. For all the patients who received tisagenlecleucel infusion, additional survival follow-up was to be performed to determine survival status every 3 months.

Being tested
tisagenlecleucel
Keywords
Refractory or relapsed Follicular Lymphoma, Refractory, Relapsed, Follicular lymphoma, CTL019, Tisagenlecleucel, Chimeric antigen receptor, CAR19, CAR-T
Medical subject headings
Lymphoma, Follicular, Recurrence

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • tisagenlecleucelBiological

    Also called CTL019

    Tisagenlecleucel is single infusion.

Study groups in NCT03568461
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CTL019ExperimentalAll patients who received tisagenlecleucel infusion.
Receives: Biological: tisagenlecleucel

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Complete Response Rate (CRR) Per Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessment

    Complete response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response (BOR) of complete response (CR) recorded from tisagenlecleucel infusion until progressive disease or start of new anticancer therapy, whichever came first. CRR was determined by an independent review committee (IRC) and was based on Lugano 2014 classification response criteria. The radiological response is first obtained from CT and PET studies according to the Lugano 2014 criteria. CT response is based on anatomical measurements of index/non-index/new lesions and spleen length. The possible response outcomes are complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), or progressive disease (PD). PET response based on a 5-point scale (5PS) or Deauville score. The possible outcomes for PET response are complete metabolic response (CMR), partial metabolic response (PMR), no metabolic response (NMR), or progressive metabolic disease (PMD).

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (21)
  1. Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per IRC Assessment

    Overall response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall disease response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Response was evaluated per Lugano 2014 classification response criteria. The radiological response is first obtained from CT and PET studies according to the Lugano 2014 criteria. CT response is based on anatomical measurements of index/non-index/new lesions and spleen length. The possible response outcomes are complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), or progressive disease (PD). PET response based on a 5-point scale (5PS) or Deauville score. The possible outcomes for PET response are complete metabolic response (CMR), partial metabolic response (PMR), no metabolic response (NMR), or progressive metabolic disease (PMD).

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Duration of Response (DOR) Per IRC Assessment

    Duration of response (DOR) applied only to participants whose best overall disease response was CR or PR. It is defined as the time from the date of first documented disease response (CR or PR) to the date of first documented progression or death due to follicular lymphoma (FL). DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

    Measured: approx. 60 months

  3. Duration of Response (DOR) for Complete Response (CR) Only Per IRC Assessment

    Duration of response (DOR) applied only to participants whose best overall disease response was complete response (CR) only. It is defined as the time from the date of first documented disease response (CR only) to the date of first documented progression or death due to follicular lymphoma (FL). DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

    Measured: approx. 60 months

  4. Progression Free Survival (PFS) Per IRC Assessment

    Progression free survival is the time from tisagenlecleucel infusion to first documented disease progression or death due to any cause. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

    Measured: up to 61.7 months

  5. Overall Survival (OS)

    Overall Survival is the time from tisagenlecleucel infusion to death due to any cause. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

    Measured: up to 65.8 months

  6. Tisagenlecleucel Transgene Concentration Levels as Measured by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) Method, by Clinical Response Per IRC Assessment

    This is the summary of cellular kinetic concentrations for tisagenlecleucel (CTL019) transgene levels in peripheral blood and bone marrow following infusion.

    Measured: Month 60 (peripheral blood), Month 6 (bone marrow)

  7. Cmax; Cellular Kinetic Parameter of Tisagenlecleucel Transgene Levels by qPCR, Based on Clinical Response IRC Assessment

    Cmax is the maximum (peak) observed in peripheral blood after single dose administration. Actual sampling times were taken into consideration for the calculation of cellular kinetic parameters parameters.

    Measured: up to 60 months after infusion

  8. Tmax; Cellular Kinetic Parameter of Tisagenlecleucel Transgene Levels by qPCR, Based on Clinical Response by IRC Assessment

    Tmax is the time to reach maximum (peak) peripheral blood after single dose administration (days). Actual sampling times were taken into consideration for the calculation of cellular kinetic parameters.

    Measured: up to 60 months after infusion

  9. AUC0-28d and AUC0-84d; Cellular Kinetic Parameter of Tisagenlecleucel Transgene Levels by qPCR, Based on Clinical Response by IRC Assessment

    AUC0-28 is the area under curve (AUC) from time zero to day 28 in peripheral blood. AUC0-84d is the AUC from time zero to day 84 in peripheral blood. Actual sampling times were taken into consideration for the calculation of cellular kinetic parameters.

    Measured: 0 to 28 days after infusion, 0 to 84 days after infusion

  10. AUC0-28d and AUC0-84d; Cellular Kinetic Parameter for Tisagenlecleucel by Flow Cytometry, Based on Clinical Response by IRC Assessment

    Exposure is summarized as area under the curve (AUC) from time 0 to 28 days (AUC0-28d) and from time to 84 days (AUC0-84d). The cellular kinetic parameters were estimated from the percentages of CD3+/CTL019+ cells obtained from flow cytometry. Flow cytometry measures the surface expression of chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) on T cells.

    Measured: AUC0-28d: from time of infusion to 28 days post-dose; AUC0-84d: from time of infusion to 84 days post-infusion

  11. Cmax; Cellular Kinetic Parameter for Tisagenlecleucel by Flow Cytometry, Based on Clinical Response by IRC Assessment

    Cmax is the maximum (peak) observed in peripheral blood after single dose administration. Actual sampling times were taken into consideration for the calculation of cellular kinetic parameters parameters.

    Measured: From pre-dose until 60 months after infusion

  12. Summary of Exposure of CD3+ Tisagenlecleucel Cells in Peripheral Blood for Tmax

    In vivo cellular kinetics of CD3+/CTL019+ levels tisagenlecleucel cells detected by flow cytometry base on best overall response (BOR). The cellular kinetic parameters were estimated from the percentages of CD3+/CTL019+ cells obtained from flow cytometry. Flow cytometry measures the surface expression of chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) on T cells.

    Measured: From pre-dose until 60 months after infusion

  13. Humoral Immunogenicity: Number of Participants With Anti-mCAR19 Antibodies, Per IRC Assessment

    Antibody titers specific to the tisagenlecleucel molecule prior to and following infusion. Percentage of participants who tested positive for anti-mCAR19 antibodies at any time post-baseline. A participant was only defined as positive for tisagenlecleucel treatment-induced or -boosted anti-mCAR19 antibodies when the anti-mCAR19 antibody median fluorescence intensity (MFI) at any time post-infusion was at least 2.28-fold higher than pre-infusion levels for patients whose baseline status was positive (boosted) or if the baseline status was negative, but any post-baseline interpretation was positive (induced).

    Measured: at any time post-baseline, up to 24 months post-infusion

  14. Cellular Immunogenicity: Percentage of Interferon Gamma (IFNg+) Cells by Flow Cytometry Per IRC Assessment

    Activation of T-cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells collected from participants in response to mCAR19-derived peptides was used to assess the cellular immunogenicity against tisagenlecleucel. T-cell activation was measured by the percentage of interferon gamma (IFNg+) cells by flow cytometry. Cellular responses to mCART peptides were measured pre-infusion (enrollment) and post-tisagenlecleucel infusion.

    Pool 1 and Pool 2 are a pool of 60 peptides (peptides 1-60) and 59 peptides (peptides 61-119) , respectively, corresponding to the CTL019 transgene product. Together, they comprised 119 peptides spanning the CTL019 transgene product and were used to stimulate PBMCs to detect antigen-specific T cell responses via intracellular cytokine staining.

    Measured: pre-infusion (pre-Lymph depletion evaluation), 24 months post-infusion

  15. Summary Scores of Patient-reported Outcome (PRO) Measured by SF-36v2 Quality of Life Questionnaire by Visit

    Effect of tisagenlecleucel therapy on patient reported outcomes were reported using the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) v2 form. The SF-36 v2 is a widely used and extensively studied instrument to measure health-related quality of life among healthy patients and patients with acute and chronic conditions. It consists of eight subscales that can be scored individually: Physical Functioning, Role-Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role-Emotional, and Mental Health. Two overall summary scores, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS) were computed by summing the item responses on the questions for each domain in accordance with the respective scoring method provided by the developers. Each item is scored on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively. A high score defines a more favorable health state.

    Measured: Baseline (BL) Month (M) 3, M3, M6, M9, M12, M18, M24

  16. Summary Scores of PRO Measured by SF-36v2 Quality of Life Questionnaire Reported by Change From Baseline

    Effect of tisagenlecleucel therapy on patient reported outcomes were reported using the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) v2 form. The SF-36 v2 is a widely used and extensively studied instrument to measure health-related quality of life among healthy patients and patients with acute and chronic conditions. It consists of eight subscales that can be scored individually: Physical Functioning, Role-Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role-Emotional, and Mental Health. Two overall summary scores, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS) were computed by summing the item responses on the questions for each domain in accordance with the respective scoring method provided by the developers. Each item is scored on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively. A high score defines a more favorable health state.

    Measured: Change from baseline (CFB) M3, CFB M6, CFB M9, CFB M12, CFB M18, CFB M24

  17. Health Status Measured by EQ-5D-3L Questionnaire

    Effect of tisagenlecleucel therapy on patient-reported outcomes was assessed using the EuroQol 5-Dimension, 3-Level instrument (EQ-5D-3L). The EQ-5D-3L is a widely used, self-administered questionnaire designed to evaluate health status in adults. It consists of two sections. The first includes one item for each of the five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Patients rate each dimension as "no problems" (level 1), "some problems" (level 2), or "extreme problems" (level 3). This record summarizes, for each of the five dimensions, the number of patients falling into each response level.

    Measured: Baseline (BL), Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24, Month 36

  18. Summary Scores of PRO Measured by EQ-VAS Quality of Life Questionnaire by Visit

    Effect of tisagenlecleucel therapy on patient reported outcomes were reported using the EQ-VAS (EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale). The EQ-VAS is a 20 cm vertical, 0-100 numerical scale used alongside the EQ-5D questionnaire to measure a patient's self-rated health. It anchors "best imaginable health" (100) at the top and "worst imaginable health" (0) at the bottom, providing a quick, subjective, quantitative, and global assessment of health status on the day of survey. The second section of the questionnaire measures self-rated (global) health status utilizing a vertically oriented visual analogue scale where 100 represents the "best possible health state" and 0 represents the "worst possible health state."

    Measured: Baseline (BL) Month (M) 3, M6, M9, M12, M18, M24, M36

  19. Summary Scores of PRO Measured by EQ-VAS Quality of Life Questionnaire Reported by Change From Baseline

    Effect of tisagenlecleucel therapy on patient reported outcomes were reported using the EQ-VAS (EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale). The EQ-VAS is a 20 cm vertical, 0-100 numerical scale used alongside the EQ-5D questionnaire to measure a patient's self-rated health. It anchors "best imaginable health" (100) at the top and "worst imaginable health" (0) at the bottom, providing a quick, subjective, quantitative, and global assessment of health status on the day of survey

    Measured: Baseline (BL), M3 change from baseline (CFB), M6 CFB, M9 CFB, M12 CFB, M18 CFB, M24 CFB, M36 CFB

  20. Summary Scores of PRO Measured by FACT-Lym Quality of Life Questionnaire

    The effect of tisagenlecleucel therapy on patient-reported outcomes was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) questionnaire, which measures quality of life in participants with lymphoma. FACT-Lym is composed of the FACT-G (27 items across Physical, Social/Family, Emotional, and Functional Well-Being, plus Additional Concerns) and a 15-item lymphoma-specific subscale. All items use a five-point self-administered response scale (0-4), with higher scores indicating better quality of life. The possible score ranges are as follows: - Physical Well-Being (PWB): 0-28 - Social/Family Well-Being (SWB): 0-28 - Emotional Well-Being (EWB): 0-24 - Functional Well-Being (FWB): 0-28 - Lym Subscale (15 items): 0-60 - Lymphoma Trial Outcome Index (TOI: PWB + FWB + Lym): 0-116 - FACT-G Total (PWB + SWB + EWB + FWB): 0-108 - FACT-Lym Total (FACT-G + Lym): 0-168 In all cases, higher scores indicate better outcomes within the corresponding domain.

    Measured: Baseline (BL) Month (M) 3, M6, M9, M12, M18, M24, M36

  21. Summary Scores of PRO Measured by FACT-Lym Quality of Life Questionnaire Reported by Change From Baseline

    The effect of tisagenlecleucel therapy on patient-reported outcomes was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) questionnaire, which measures quality of life in participants with lymphoma. FACT-Lym is composed of the FACT-G (27 items across Physical, Social/Family, Emotional, and Functional Well-Being, plus Additional Concerns) and a 15-item lymphoma-specific subscale. All items use a five-point self-administered response scale (0-4), with higher scores indicating better quality of life. The possible score ranges are as follows: - Physical Well-Being (PWB): 0-28 - Social/Family Well-Being (SWB): 0-28 - Emotional Well-Being (EWB): 0-24 - Functional Well-Being (FWB): 0-28 - Lym Subscale (15 items): 0-60 - Lymphoma Trial Outcome Index (TOI: PWB + FWB + Lym): 0-116 - FACT-G Total (PWB + SWB + EWB + FWB): 0-108 - FACT-Lym Total (FACT-G + Lym): 0-168 In all cases, higher scores indicate better outcomes within the corresponding domain.

    Measured: Baseline (BL), M3 change from baseline (CFB), M6 CFB, M9 CFB, M12 CFB, M18 CFB, M24 CFB, M36 CFB

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Jun 2018
  2. Study start12 Nov 2018
  3. Primary completion24 Nov 2020
  4. Study completion28 May 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
98 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03568461
Sponsor's protocol ID
CCTL019E2202
Other IDs
2017-004385-94, 2023-508127-13-00, 2023, 2017
Acronym
ELARA
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
24 May 2018
Last updated
9 Jul 2026
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent expert panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data is currently available according to the process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com.

Publications

  • Dreyling M, Fowler NH, Dickinson M, Martinez-Lopez J, Kolstad A, Butler J, Ghosh M, Popplewell L, Chavez JC, Bachy E, Kato K, Harigae H, Kersten MJ, Andreadis C, Riedell PA, Ho PJ, Perez-Simon JA, Chen AI, Nastoupil LJ, von Tresckow B, Maria Ferreri AJ, Teshima T, Patten PEM, McGuirk JP, Petzer AL, Offner F, Viardot A, Zinzani PL, Malladi R, Paule I, Zia A, Awasthi R, Han X, Germano D, O'Donovan D, Ramos R, Maier HJ, Masood A, Thieblemont C, Schuster SJ. Durable response after tisagenlecleucel in adults with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma: ELARA trial update. Blood. 2024 Apr 25;143(17):1713-1725. doi: 10.1182/blood.2023021567.

    PubMed 38194692
  • Salles G, Schuster SJ, Dreyling M, Fischer L, Kuruvilla J, Patten PEM, von Tresckow B, Smith SM, Jimenez-Ubieto A, Davis KL, Anjos C, Chu J, Zhang J, Lobetti Bodoni C, Thieblemont C, Fowler NH, Dickinson M, Martinez-Lopez J, Wang Y, Link BK. Efficacy comparison of tisagenlecleucel vs usual care in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma. Blood Adv. 2022 Nov 22;6(22):5835-5843. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008150.

    PubMed 35973192
  • Fowler NH, Dickinson M, Dreyling M, Martinez-Lopez J, Kolstad A, Butler J, Ghosh M, Popplewell L, Chavez JC, Bachy E, Kato K, Harigae H, Kersten MJ, Andreadis C, Riedell PA, Ho PJ, Perez-Simon JA, Chen AI, Nastoupil LJ, von Tresckow B, Ferreri AJM, Teshima T, Patten PEM, McGuirk JP, Petzer AL, Offner F, Viardot A, Zinzani PL, Malladi R, Zia A, Awasthi R, Masood A, Anak O, Schuster SJ, Thieblemont C. Tisagenlecleucel in adult relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma: the phase 2 ELARA trial. Nat Med. 2022 Feb;28(2):325-332. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01622-0. Epub 2021 Dec 17.

    PubMed 34921238

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing tisagenlecleucel in people with Follicular Lymphoma, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 30 sites in 12 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 30 sites in United States, Australia, Germany, Japan, France and 7 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 Jul 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Complete Response Rate (CRR) Per Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessment (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03568461, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jul 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in