Atopic DermatitisPhase 3Measure Up 1NCT03569293
Evaluation of Upadacitinib in Adolescent and Adult Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis (Eczema)
A Phase 3 study testing Upadacitinib in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by AbbVie at 180 sites in 25 countries.
Trial summary
The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib for the treatment of adolescent and adult participants with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) who are candidates for systemic therapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Atopic Dermatitis
- What is being tested?
- Upadacitinib
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 912 participants
- Where
- 180 sitesin 25 countries
- Study dates
- 13 Aug 2018to 10 Oct 2025
- Phase
- Phase 3
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Body weight of ≥ 40 kg at Baseline Visit for participants between ≥ 12 and < 18 years of age
- Chronic atopic dermatitis (AD) with onset of symptoms at least 3 years before Baseline Visit and subject meets Hanifin and Rajka criteria.
- Active moderate to severe AD defined by:
- Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score ≥ 16 at the Screening and Baseline Visits;
- Validated Investigator's Global Assessment (vIGA) score ≥ 3 at the Screening and Baseline Visits;
- ≥ 10% Body surface area (BSA) of AD involvement at the Screening and Baseline Visits;
Show all 10Show fewer
- Baseline weekly average of daily Worst Pruritus NRS ≥ 4.
- Candidate for systemic therapy or have recently required systemic therapy for AD
- Subject has applied a topical emollient (moisturizer) twice daily for at least 7 days before the Baseline Visit.
- Documented history of inadequate response to topical corticosteroids (TCS) or topical calcineurin inhibitor (TCI) or documented systemic treatment for AD within 6 months before Baseline Visit
Who cannot join
- Prior exposure to any Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor
- Unable or unwilling to discontinue current atopic dermatitis treatments prior to the study
- Requirement of prohibited medications during the study
- Other active skin diseases or skin infections requiring systemic treatment or would interfere with appropriate assessment of atopic dermatitis lesions
- Female subject who is pregnant, breastfeeding, or considering pregnancy during the study
Trial locations and contacts
180 sites in 25 countries.
180 sites in 25 countries
United States58 sites
Arlington Research Center, Inc /ID# 200391
Arlington, Texas, 76011
Orion Clinical Research /ID# 204703
Austin, Texas, 78759-4100
Bakersfield Derma & Skin Cance /ID# 200433
Bakersfield, California, 93309
Northeast Dermatology /ID# 201338
Beverly, Massachusetts, 01915
Clearlyderm Dermatology /ID# 208371
Boca Raton, Florida, 33428
Skin Care Research, LLC /ID# 200811
Boca Raton, Florida, 33486-2269
Massachusetts General Hospital /ID# 200474
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Christie Clinic, LLC /ID# 200427
Champaign, Illinois, 61820
Coastal Clinical Research Center of the Carolinas /ID# 200402
Charleston, South Carolina, 29414
Clin Res Inst of Michigan, LLC /ID# 208019
Chesterfield, Michigan, 48047
Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine /ID# 201644
Chicago, Illinois, 60611-2927
Olympian Clinical Research /ID# 202914
Clearwater, Florida, 33756
Velocity clinical research /ID# 202653
Cleveland, Ohio, 44122
Clinical Trials Management, LLC - Covington /ID# 212658
Covington, Louisiana, 70433
Modern Research Associates, PL /ID# 200705
Dallas, Texas, 75231
Menter Dermatology Res Inst /ID# 200390
Dallas, Texas, 75246
Henry Ford Medical Center /ID# 204191
Detroit, Michigan, 48202-3046
First OC Dermatology /ID# 201910
Fountain Valley, California, 92708-3701
Dermdox Dermatology Centers, PC /ID# 213782
Hazleton, Pennsylvania, 18201
Dawes Fretzin, LLC /ID# 200366
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46256
Clinical Partners, LLC /ID# 200460
Johnston, Rhode Island, 02919
Forest Hills Dermatology Group /ID# 209244
Kew Gardens, New York, 11415
Cleaver Dermatology /ID# 202825
Kirksville, Missouri, 63501-5362
Multi-Speciality Research Associates /ID# 213254
Lake City, Florida, 32055-8835
Clinical Research Consortium /ID# 200734
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89119-5190
California Allergy and Asthma Medical Group /ID# 200727
Los Angeles, California, 90025-7014
GSI Clinical Research, LLC /ID# 200849
Margate, Florida, 33063
Clinical Trials Management, LLC - Metairie /ID# 212659
Metairie, Louisiana, 70006-4165
Florida International Rsrch cr /ID# 218507
Miami, Florida, 33173
Allergy & Asthma Associates of Southern California /ID# 200733
Mission Viejo, California, 92691-6410
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai /ID# 200370
New York, New York, 10029-6504
Dermatology Clinical Trials /ID# 205876
Newport Beach, California, 92660-7853
Tory P Sullivan, MD PA /ID# 200671
North Miami Beach, Florida, 33162-4708
Lynn Health Science Institute (LHSI) /ID# 212676
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73112
Newton Clinical Research /ID# 204169
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73120-5049
Advanced Dermatology of the Midlands /ID# 201689
Omaha, Nebraska, 68144-1105
Leavitt Medical Associates of Florida /ID# 200880
Ormond Beach, Florida, 32174
Alliance Dermatology and MOHs /ID# 200375
Phoenix, Arizona, 85032
Oregon Medical Res Center PC /ID# 200428
Portland, Oregon, 97223
Oregon Health and Science University /ID# 200992
Portland, Oregon, 97239
AllCutis Research Inc /ID# 200981
Portsmouth, New Hampshire, 03801
Integrated Dermatology of Massachusetts, LLC /ID# 209468
Quincy, Massachusetts, 02169
UC Davis /ID# 203622
Sacramento, California, 95817
Synergy Dermatology /ID# 200842
San Francisco, California, 94132-1909
San Luis Derm and Laser Clinic /ID# 200372
San Luis Obispo, California, 93405
Clear Dermatology & Aesthetics Center /ID# 201256
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85255-4134
Dermatology Physicians of Connecticut /ID# 200928
Shelton, Connecticut, 06484-6211
The South Bend Clinic Center /ID# 200371
South Bend, Indiana, 46617
Dermatology Specialists of Spokane /ID# 202068
Spokane, Washington, 99202
Stanford University /ID# 200440
Stanford, California, 94305
Precision Clinical Research /ID# 209002
Sunrise, Florida, 33351-7311
Montefiore Medical Center /ID# 200456
The Bronx, New York, 10467
J. Schwartz, MD, PLLC /ID# 202121
Troy, New York, 12180-2323
Care Access Research - Walnut Creek /ID# 200940
Walnut Creek, California, 94598-2488
Foxhall Research Center /ID# 213682
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20016-4300
Duplicate_George Washington Univ Med /ID# 200364
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20037
Center for Clinical Studies - Webster TX /ID# 203185
Webster, Texas, 77598
Integrated Clinical Research LLC /ID# 200900
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33406-6063
Canada15 sites
Kirk Barber Research, CA /ID# 200324
Calgary, Alberta, T2G 1B1
Dermatology Research Institute Inc. /ID# 200318
Calgary, Alberta, T2J 7E1
Dr. Irina Turchin PC Inc. /ID# 200322
Fredericton, New Brunswick, E3B 1G9
Hamilton Health Sciences - McMaster University Medical Centre /ID# 200313
Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1
Dr. Wei Jing Loo Medicine Prof /ID# 206051
London, Ontario, N6H 5L5
Lynderm Research Inc. /ID# 200315
Markham, Ontario, L3P 1X2
Innovaderm Research Inc. /ID# 200320
Montreal, Quebec, H2X 2V1
Dr. David Gratton Dermat Inc. /ID# 200309
Montreal, Quebec, H3H 1V4
Dermatology Ottawa Research Centre /ID# 200319
Ottawa, Ontario, K2C 3N2
Dre Angelique Gagne-Henley M.D. inc. /ID# 200326
Saint-Jérôme, Quebec, J7Z 7E2
Karma Clinical Trials /ID# 200316
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, A1A 4Y3
Dr. Chih-ho Hong Medical Inc. /ID# 200311
Surrey, British Columbia, V3R 6A7
Enverus Medical Research /ID# 200307
Surrey, British Columbia, V3V 0C6
K. Papp Clinical Research /ID# 200317
Waterloo, Ontario, N2J 1C4
Wiseman Dermatology Research /ID# 200323
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3M 3Z4
Japan11 sites
University of Yamanashi Hospital /ID# 204174
Chuo-shi, Yamanashi, 409-3821
Fukuoka University Hospital /ID# 201309
Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 814-0180
Kyushu Central Hospital of the Mutual Aid Association of Public School Teachers /ID# 202891
Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 815-8588
Gifu University Hospital /ID# 201760
Gifu, Gifu, 501-1194
University Hospital Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine /ID# 201876
Kyoto, Kyoto, 602-8566
Aichi Medical University Hospital /ID# 202833
Nagakute-shi, Aichi-ken, 480-1195
Takagi Dermatology Clinic /ID# 201238
Obihiro-shi, Hokkaido, 080-0013
Ogaki Municipal Hospital /ID# 203463
Ogaki-shi, Gifu, 503-8502
Kume Clinic /ID# 201912
Sakai-shi, Osaka, 5938324
Medical Cooperation Kojinkai Sapporo Skin Clinic /ID# 201239
Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0063
NTT Medical Center Tokyo /ID# 201759
Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 141-8625
China10 sites
Peking University People's Hospital /ID# 202549
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100044
Peking University Third Hospital /ID# 202612
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100191
Beijing Friendship Hospital /ID# 202601
Beijing, 100032
Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University /ID# 208597
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510120
The Third Affiliated Hospital Of Sun Yat-Sen University /ID# 202548
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510630
The second Affiliated hospital of Zhejiang University school of Medicine /ID# 202608
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310009
Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine /ID# 202554
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200065
Huashan Hospital of Fudan University /ID# 205760
Shanghai, 200040
The First Hospital of China Medical University /ID# 202615
Shenyang, Liaoning, 110001
Union Hospital affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Sc /ID# 208598
Wuhan, 420022
Germany9 sites
Universitaetsklinikum Bonn /ID# 202086
Bonn, 53127
Universitaetsklinikum Frankfurt /ID# 202089
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, 60590
TFS Trial Form Support GmbH /ID# 202083
Hamburg, 20537
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover /ID# 202091
Hanover, 30625
Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel /ID# 202255
Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, 24105
Universitaetsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universitaet Mainz /ID# 205192
Mainz, 55131
Duplicate_Klinikum rechts der Isar - Technische Universitaet Muenchen /ID# 202087
Munich, Bavaria, 80802
Universitaetsklinikum Muenster /ID# 202085
Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, 48149
CMS3 Company for Medical Study /ID# 205193
Selters, Rhineland-Palatinate, 56242
France8 sites
Centre Hospitalier du Mans /ID# 205991
Le Mans, Sarthe, 72037
Hopital Saint Vincent de Paul /ID# 218253
Lille, 59020
Le Bateau BLanc /ID# 206833
Martigues, 13500
CHU de Nantes, Hotel Dieu -HME /ID# 206377
Nantes, Pays de la Loire Region, 44000
AP-HP - Hopital Necker /ID# 218364
Paris, 75015
HCL - Hôpital Lyon Sud /ID# 201529
Pierre-Bénite, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, 69495
Hôpital Charles-Nicolle /ID# 201525
Rouen, 76000
CHU Toulouse - Hopital Larrey /ID# 201528
Toulouse, 31400
Italy6 sites
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona /ID# 200692
Ancona, 60126
A.O.U. di Bologna Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi /ID# 200746
Bologna, 40138
A.O.U. Policlinico G. Rodolico S.Marco- Presidio G.Rodolico /ID# 200741
Catania, 95123
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Federico II /ID# 200750
Naples, 80131
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana-Stabilimento di Santa Chiara /ID# 200695
Pisa, 56126
Fondazione PTV Policlinico Tor Vergata /ID# 201136
Rome, Roma, 00133
Australia5 sites
Skin Health Institute Inc /ID# 204791
Carlton, Victoria, 3053
Holdsworth House Medical Practice /ID# 211236
Darlinghurst, New South Wales, 2010
Fremantle Dermatology /ID# 205305
Fremantle, Western Australia, 6160
North Eastern Health Specialists /ID# 205802
Hectorville, South Australia, 5073
Woden Dermatology /ID# 205799
Phillip, Australian Capital Territory, 2606
Croatia5 sites
Duplicate_Klinicki bolnicki centar Osijek /ID# 201523
Osijek, County of Osijek-Baranja, 31000
Klinicki bolnicki centar Rijeka /ID# 217423
Rijeka, Primorje-Gorski Kotar County, 51000
Klinicki bolnicki centar Split /ID# 201527
Split, Split-Dalmatia County, 21000
Klinicki bolnicki centar Zagreb /ID# 201879
Zagreb, City of Zagreb, 10000
Klinika za dječje bolesti Zagreb /ID# 203151
Zagreb, City of Zagreb, 10000
Russia5 sites
Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Dermatovenerologic Dispensary /ID# 201996
Chelyabinsk, Chelyabinsk Oblast, 454048
Clinical Dermatovenerology Dispensary /ID# 203439
Krasnodar, Krasnodarskiy Kray, 350020
National Medical Research Center for Children's Health /ID# 203440
Moscow, 119296
Saratov State Medical University n.a. V.I. Razumovskiy /ID# 201595
Saratov, Saratov Oblast, 410012
Ural Research Institute of dermatovenerology and immunopathology /ID# 201593
Yekaterinburg, Sverdlovsk Oblast, 620076
Switzerland5 sites
Universitätsspital Basel /ID# 201599
Basel, Canton of Basel-City, 4031
Inselspital, Universitätsspital Bern /ID# 201598
Bern, 3010
Hôpitaux Universitaires Genève /ID# 201600
Geneva, Canton of Geneva, 1205
CHUV, Centre hospitalier universitaire vaudois /ID# 200910
Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, 1011
CHUV, Centre hospitalier universitaire vaudois /ID# 206505
Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, 1011
United Kingdom5 sites
West Middlesex University Hospital /ID# 202273
Isleworth, London, City of, TW7 6AF
Barts Health NHS Trust /ID# 201043
London, London, City of, E1 2ES
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust /ID# 201192
London, London, City of, SE1 9RT
Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust9 /ID# 201971
London, SW10 9NH
Northern Care Alliance NHS Group /ID# 201194
Salford, M6 8HD
Bosnia and Herzegovina4 sites
University Clinical Centre of the Republic of Srpska /ID# 202666
Banja Luka, Republika Srpska, 78000
University Clinical Centre of the Republic of Srpska /ID# 202667
Banja Luka, Republika Srpska, 78000
Clinical Center University of Sarajevo /ID# 202668
Sarajevo, 71000
Clinical Center University of Sarajevo /ID# 202669
Sarajevo, 71000
Colombia4 sites
Ctr Int de Reum del Caribe SAS /ID# 201620
Barranquilla, Atlántico, 80002
Clinisalud del sur /ID# 218100
Medellín, Antioquia, 055422
Fundacion Centro de Excelencia en Enfermedades Cronicas no Transmisibles - FUNCE /ID# 201905
Montería, Departamento de Córdoba, 230002
Fundacion Hospital San Vicente de Paul - Rionegro /ID# 202043
Rionegro, Antioquia, 054040
Turkey (Türkiye)4 sites
Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine /ID# 204099
Ankara, 06100
Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty /ID# 204100
Istanbul, 34098
Erciyes University Medical Fac /ID# 204098
Melikgazi, Kayseri, 38030
Gazi Universitesi Tip Fakultes /ID# 204176
Yenimahalle, 06560
Argentina3 sites
Instituto de Neumonología y Dermatología /ID# 203444
Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aire, Ciuadad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, 1425
Psoriahue Med Interdisciplinar /ID# 202451
Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aire, Ciuadad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, 1425
Framingham Centro Medico /ID# 202688
La Plata, Buenos Aires, 1902
Bulgaria3 sites
UMHAT Dr Georgi Stranski EAD /ID# 201521
Pleven, 5800
UMHAT Alexandrovska EAD /ID# 201519
Sofia, 1431
UMHAT Professor Stoyan Kirkovich /ID# 201522
Stara Zagora, 6000
Denmark3 sites
Aarhus University Hospital /ID# 200737
Aarhus N, Central Jutland, 8200
Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital /ID# 200979
Copenhagen NV, Capital Region, 2400
Herlev and Gentofte Hospital /ID# 200736
Hellerup, Capital Region, 2900
Estonia3 sites
North Estonia Medical Centre /ID# 200951
Mustamäe, Harju, 13419
Confido Private Medical Clinic /ID# 200846
Tallinn, Harju, 11313
Tartu University Hospital /ID# 200847
Tartu, Tartu, 50406
Finland3 sites
Kuopio University Hospital /ID# 202449
Kuopio, 70210
Terveystalo Tampere /ID# 201117
Tampere, 33100
Mehiläinen Neo /ID# 201116
Turku, Southwest Finland, 20520
Malaysia3 sites
Hospital Selayang /ID# 204378
Batu Caves, Selangor, 68100
Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun /ID# 204375
Ipoh, Perak, 30450
Queen Elizabeth Hospital /ID# 204379
Kota Kinabalu, Division Pantai Barat Utara, Sabah, 88200
Puerto Rico3 sites
Cruz-Santana, Carolina, PR /ID# 201096
Carolina, 00985
Ponce Medical School Foundation /ID# 201821
Ponce, 00716-0377
Clinical Research Puerto Rico /ID# 203309
San Juan, 00909
Romania2 sites
Spitalul Clinic Colentina /ID# 205860
Bucharest, 020121
Cabinet Medical de Dermatovenerologie Dr. Remus Orasan /ID# 205862
Cluj-Napoca, 400105
Ukraine2 sites
ME "Rivne Regional Dermatology and Venereology Dispensary" of RRC /ID# 210504
Rivne, 33028
Military Hospital of Military-Medical Clinical Center of Southern Region /ID# 201962
Zaporizhzhya, Zaporizhzhia Oblast, 69063
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3 Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate Upadacitinib in Adolescent and Adult Subjects With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis
The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib for the treatment of adolescent and adult participants with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) who are candidates for systemic therapy.
Read the detailed description
This study includes a 35-day screening period, a 16-week double-blind period, a blinded extension period up to Week 260, and a 30-day follow-up visit.
Participants who meet eligibility criteria in the main study will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive a daily oral dose of upadacitinib 30 mg or upadacitinib 15 mg or matching placebo. Upon completion of enrollment of 810 participants in the main study, a supplemental study will continue to enroll adolescents (adolescent sub-study) until a total of 180 adolescent participants are enrolled in the overall study (main study + adolescent sub-study).
Randomization for the main study will be stratified by baseline disease severity (validated Investigator Global Assessment scale for Atopic Dermatitis [vIGA-AD] score of moderate [3] versus severe [4]), by geographic region (United States [US]/Puerto Rico/Canada, Japan, China, and Other), and by age (adolescent [ages 12 to 17] versus adult [ages 18 to 75]). The separate randomization for the adolescent sub-study will be stratified by baseline disease severity (moderate [vIGA-AD 3] vs. severe [vIGA-AD 4]) and by geographic region (US/Puerto Rico/Canada and Other).
At Week 16 of the main study and the adolescent sub-study, participants in the placebo group will be re-randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive daily oral doses of upadacitinib 30 mg or upadacitinib 15 mg in the blinded extension period. In the main study the re-randomization at Week 16 will be stratified by Week 16 50% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index [EASI 50] responder [yes/no], geographic region [US/Puerto Rico/Canada, China [Mainland], Japan, and other], and age group [adolescent/adult]. For the adolescent sub-study, the re-randomization will be stratified by EASI 50 responder (Yes/No) and by geographic region (US/Puerto Rico/Canada and Other).
Participants originally randomized to upadacitinib will continue upadacitinib in the extension period at the same dose.
Starting at the Week 4 visit, rescue treatment for AD may be provided at the discretion of the investigator if medically necessary.
The Primary Analysis for the main study will be conducted after all ongoing participants have completed Week 16. In addition, a Primary Analysis for the adolescent population (including the adolescent participants from the main study and the adolescent sub-study) will be conducted after all ongoing adolescent participants have completed Week 16.
Following the interim analysis, significant noncompliance was identified at a clinical site. As a result, all data from the site, including data from 10 adolescent participants, has been excluded from the final analysis of the outcome measures as appropriate.
- Conditions
- Atopic Dermatitis
- Being tested
- Placebo for Upadacitinib, Upadacitinib
- Keywords
- Atopic Dermatitis, Upadacitinib
- Medical subject headings
- Dermatitis, Atopic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Placebo for UpadacitinibDrug
Tablets taken orally once a day
UpadacitinibDrug
Also called ABT-494, RINVOQ™
Tablets taken orally once a day
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo / Upadacitinib | Placebo comparator | Participants will receive placebo orally once a day (QD) for 16 weeks in the double-blind treatment period. At Week 16 participants will be re-randomized to receive either upadacitinib 15 mg or upadacitinib 30 mg QD up to Week 260. Receives: Drug: Placebo for Upadacitinib; Drug: Upadacitinib |
| Upadacitinib 15 mg QD | Experimental | Participants will receive upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for up to 260 weeks. Receives: Drug: Upadacitinib |
| Upadacitinib 30 mg QD | Experimental | Participants will receive upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for up to 260 weeks. Receives: Drug: Upadacitinib |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 75% Reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index Score (EASI 75) From Baseline at Week 16
EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD) of 0 or 1 With a Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 2 Points at Week 16
The vIGA-AD is a validated assessment instrument to rate the severity of atopic dermatitis globally, based on the following scale:
- 0 - Clear: No inflammatory signs of AD;
- 1 - Almost clear: Barely perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification;
- 2 - Mild: Slight but definite erythema, induration/papulation and/or minimal lichenification. No oozing or crusting;
- 3 - Moderate: Clearly perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification, oozing or crusting may be present;
- 4 - Severe: Marked erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification; Oozing or crusting may be present.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Secondary outcomes (44)
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16
Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). Pruritus NRS was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores.
Measured: Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 16
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a 90% Reduction From Baseline in EASI Score (EASI 90) at Week 16
EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Week 4
Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). Pruritus NRS was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores.
Measured: Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 4
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving an EASI 75 Response at Week 2
EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.
An EASI 75 response is defined as at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in EASI score.
Measured: Baseline and Week 2
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Week 1
Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). Pruritus NRS was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores.
Measured: Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 1
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Day 2
Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch).
The percentage of participants who had a 4-point or greater improvement from Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS score at Day 2 was pre-specified as a ranked secondary endpoint for participants in the upadacitinib 30 mg group versus placebo group only.
Measured: Baseline and Day 2
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Day 3
Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch).
The percentage of participants who had a 4-point or greater improvement in Worst Pruritus NRS score from Baseline at Day 3 was pre-specified as a ranked secondary endpoint for participants in the upadacitinib 15 mg group versus placebo group only.
Measured: Baseline and Day 3
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Experiencing a Flare During the Double-blind Treatment Period
A flare, characterized as a clinically meaningful worsening in EASI, is defined as an increase in EASI score of ≥ 6.6 points from Baseline during the double-blind treatment period and prior to use of any rescue medication. Flare was assessed in participants with an EASI score of 65.4 or less at Baseline.
Measured: From first dose of study drug to Week 16
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 12 Points From Baseline in Atopic Dermatitis Impact Scale (ADerm-IS) Sleep Domain Score at Week 16
The ADerm-IS is a 10-item patient reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire designed to assess a variety of impacts that participants experience from their AD.
The ADerm-IS sleep domain consists of 3 questions designed to assess the impact of AD on sleep on a daily basis over a 24-hour recall period. The items include difficulty falling asleep, impact on sleep, and waking at night. Each question is scored on an 11-point NRS from 0 (no impact) to 10 (extreme impact). The ADerm-IS sleep domain score is the sum of the 3 item scores and ranges from 0 (no impact) to 30 (worst impact). The ADerm-IS sleep domain was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores.
The minimal clinically important difference for ADerm-IS sleep domain score is 12.
Measured: Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 16
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Atopic Dermatitis Symptom Scale (ADerm-SS) Skin Pain Score at Week 16
The ADerm-SS is an 11-item PRO questionnaire designed to assess signs and symptoms that patients may experience due to AD using a 24-hour recall period. For the skin pain item participants were asked on a daily basis to indicate how bad their worst skin pain due to AD was in the past 24 hours on an NRS from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). The ADerm-SS skin pain score was analyzed using weekly rolling averages of daily scores. The minimal clinically important difference for ADerm-SS skin pain score is 4.
Measured: Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 16
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 28 Points From Baseline in ADerm-SS 7-Item Total Symptom Score (TSS-7) at Week 16
The ADerm-SS is an 11-item questionnaire designed to assess signs and symptoms that participants may experience due to AD using a 24-hour recall period. The 7-item total symptom score includes 7 symptoms (items 1-7 of the ADerm-SS), each assessed on a NRS from 0 (no symptom) to 10 (worst imaginable). The 7 symptoms included in the score are itch while asleep, itch while awake, skin pain (each assessed daily), skin cracking, skin cracking pain, dry skin, and skin flaking (assessed weekly). The TSS-7 score ranges from 0 to 70, with higher scores indicating worsening symptoms. The minimal clinically important difference for ADerm-SS TSS-7 is 28.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 11 Points From Baseline in ADerm-IS Emotional State Domain Score at Week 16
The ADerm-IS is a 10-item PRO questionnaire designed to assess a variety of impacts that participants experience from their AD.
ADerm-IS emotional state sums three items [Items 8-10] measuring self-consciousness, embarrassment, and sadness with a 7-day recall. Each question is scored on an 11-point NRS from 0 (no impact) to 10 (extreme impact). The emotional state domain score ranges from 0 to 30, where higher scores represent worst impact.
The minimal clinically important difference for ADerm-IS emotional state domain score is 11.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 14 Points From Baseline in in ADerm-IS Daily Activities Domain Score at Week 16
The ADerm-IS is a 10-item PRO questionnaire designed to assess a variety of impacts that participants experience from their AD.
ADerm-IS daily activities sums four items measuring limitations of household, physical, and social activities, and difficulty concentrating with a 7-day recall. Each question is scored on an 11-point NRS from 0 (no impact) to 10 (extreme impact). The daily activities domain score ranges from 0 to 40, where higher scores represent worst impact.
The minimal clinically important difference for the ADerm-IS daily activities domain score is 14.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a 100% Reduction From Baseline in EASI Score (EASI 100) at Week 16
EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Main Study: Percent Change From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Week 16
Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). Pruritus NRS was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 16
Main Study: Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score at Week 16
EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1)] moderate [2], or severe [3]) for Redness (erythema, inflammation), Thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), Scratching (excoriation), and Lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease; a negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Total Score at Week 16
The POEM is a 7-item, validated questionnaire used to assess disease symptoms in both children and adults. Participants respond to 7 questions, including dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding, and weeping, each scored on a 5-point scale based on frequency of occurrence during the previous week: 0 = no days, 1 = 1 to 2 days, 2 = 3 to 4 days, 3 = 5 to 6 days, and 4 = all days. Item scores are added to provide a total score ranging from 0 (clear) to 28 (very severe atopic eczema). A change in POEM score of 3.4 points is considered the minimal clinically important difference.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 16
The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QoL). It consists of 10 questions evaluating impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a participant's QoL over the prior week, including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the side effects of treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all/not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; and 3 = very much).
Item scores are added to provide a total score, ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater impairment of QoL.
the DLQI was administered to participants who were ≥ 16 (16 to 75) years old at the time of the Screening visit.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Main Study: Percent Change From Baseline in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score at Week 16
SCORAD is a clinical tool used to assess the extent and severity of eczema (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis). The extent is assessed using the rule of 9 to calculate the affected area (A) as a percentage of the whole body (0-100%). The intensity part of the SCORAD (B) consists of 6 items: erythema, oedema/papulation, excoriations, lichenification, oozing/crusts and dryness, each graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), for a total score of 0 to 18. Subjective items (C) include daily pruritus and sleeplessness, each scored on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 (total score 0-20). SCORAD is calculated as A/5 + 7B/2 + C, and ranges from 0 to 103 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety (HADS-A) Score and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression (HADS-D) Score of < 8 at Week 16
The HADS is a 14-item questionnaire, with seven items related to anxiety (HADS-A) and seven items related to depression (HADS-D). Each item is scored from 0 to 3; scores for each subscale range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating more distress. For each domain, scores 7 or lower are considered normal, 8 to 10 are borderline, and 11 or higher indicate clinical anxiety or depression.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a DLQI Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16
The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QoL). It consists of 10 questions evaluating impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a participant's QoL over the prior week, including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the side effects of treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all/not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; and 3 = very much).
Item scores are added to provide a total score, ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater impairment of QoL. A score of 0 or 1 means that the disease has no effect at all.
the DLQI was administered to participants who were ≥ 16 (16 to 75) years old at the time of the Screening visit.
Measured: Week 16
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving an EASI 75 Response at Week 16
EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.
An EASI 75 response is defined as at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in EASI score.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a vIGA-AD of 0 or 1 With a Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 2 Points at Week 16
The vIGA-AD is a validated assessment instrument to rate the severity of atopic dermatitis globally, based on the following scale:
- 0 - Clear: No signs of AD;
- 1 - Almost clear: Barely perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification;
- 2 - Mild: Slight but definite erythema, induration/papulation and/or minimal lichenification. No oozing or crusting;
- 3 - Moderate: Clearly perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification, possible oozing or crusting;
- 4 - Severe: Marked erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification; possible oozing or crusting.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Week 16
Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). Worst pruritus NRS was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores.
Measured: Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 16
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving an EASI 90 Response at Week 16
EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.
An EASI 90 response is defined as at least a 90% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in EASI score.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Week 4
Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). Worst pruritus NRS was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores.
Measured: Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 4
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving an EASI 75 Response at Week 2
EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.
An EASI 75 response is defined as at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in EASI score.
Measured: Baseline and Week 2
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Week 1
Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). Worst pruritus NRS was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores.
Measured: Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 1
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Day 2
Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch).
Measured: Baseline and Day 2
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Day 3
Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch).
Measured: Baseline and Day 3
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Experiencing a Flare During the Double-blind Treatment Period
A flare, characterized as a clinically meaningful worsening in EASI, is defined as an increase in EASI score of ≥ 6.6 points from Baseline during the double-blind treatment period and prior to use of any rescue medication. Flares were assessed in participants with an EASI score of 65.4 or less at Baseline.
Measured: From first dose of study drug to Week 16
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 12 Points From Baseline in ADerm-IS Sleep Domain Score at Week 16
The ADerm-IS is a 10-item patient reported outcome questionnaire designed to assess a variety of impacts that participants experience from their AD.
The ADerm-IS sleep domain consists of 3 questions designed to assess the impact of AD on sleep on a daily basis over a 24-hour recall period. The items include difficulty falling asleep, impact on sleep, and waking at night. Each question is scored on an 11-point NRS from 0 (no impact) to 10 (extreme impact). The ADerm-IS sleep domain score is the sum of the 3 item scores and ranges from 0 (no impact) to 30 (worst impact). The ADerm-IS sleep domain was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores.
The minimal clinically important difference for ADerm-IS sleep domain score is 12.
Measured: Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 16
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in ADerm-SS Skin Pain Score at Week 16
The ADerm-SS is an 11-item PRO questionnaire designed to assess signs and symptoms that patients may experience due to AD using a 24-hour recall period. For the skin pain item participants were asked to indicate on a daily basis how bad their worst skin pain due to AD was in the past 24 hours on an NRS from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). The minimal clinically important difference for ADerm-SS skin pain score is 4.
The ADerm-SS skin pain score was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores.
Measured: Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 16
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 28 Points From Baseline in ADerm-SS TSS-7 at Week 16
The ADerm-SS is an 11-item questionnaire designed to assess signs and symptoms that participants may experience due to AD using a 24-hour recall period. The 7-item total symptom score includes 7 symptoms (items 1-7 of the ADerm-SS), each assessed on a NRS from 0 (no symptom) to 10 (worst imaginable). The 7 symptoms included in the score are itch while asleep, itch while awake, skin pain (each assessed daily), skin cracking, skin cracking pain, dry skin, and skin flaking (assessed weekly). The TSS-7 score ranges from 0 to 70, with higher scores indicating worsening symptoms. The minimal clinically important difference for ADerm-SS TSS-7 is 28.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 11 Points From Baseline in ADerm-IS Emotional State Domain Score at Week 16
The ADerm-IS is a 10-item PRO questionnaire designed to assess a variety of impacts that participants experience from their AD.
ADerm-IS emotional state sums three items [Items 8-10] measuring self-consciousness, embarrassment, and sadness with a 7-day recall. Each question is scored on an 11-point NRS from 0 (no impact) to 10 (extreme impact). The emotional state domain score ranges from 0 to 30, where higher scores represent worst impact.
The minimal clinically important difference for ADerm-IS emotional state domain score is 11.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 14 Points From Baseline in ADerm-IS Daily Activities Domain Score at Week 16
The ADerm-IS is a 10-item PRO questionnaire designed to assess a variety of impacts that participants experience from their AD.
ADerm-IS daily activities sums four items measuring limitations of household, physical, and social activities, and difficulty concentrating with a 7-day recall. Each question is scored on an 11-point NRS from 0 (no impact) to 10 (extreme impact). The daily activities domain score ranges from 0 to 40, where higher scores represent worst impact.
The minimal clinically important difference for the ADerm-IS daily activities domain score is 14.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving an EASI 100 Response at Week 16
EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.
An EASI 100 response is defined as a 100% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in EASI score.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Adolescents: Percent Change From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Week 16
Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). Pruritus NRS was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 16
Adolescents: Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score at Week 16
EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1)] moderate [2], or severe [3]) for Redness (erythema, inflammation), Thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), Scratching (excoriation), and Lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease; a negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in POEM Total Score at Week 16
The POEM is a 7-item, validated questionnaire used to assess disease symptoms in both children and adults. Participants respond to 7 questions, including dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding, and weeping, each scored on a 5-point scale based on frequency of occurrence during the previous week: 0 = no days, 1 = 1 to 2 days, 2 = 3 to 4 days, 3 = 5 to 6 days, and 4 = all days. Item scores are added to provide a total score ranging from 0 (clear) to 28 (very severe atopic eczema). A change in POEM score of 3.4 points is considered the minimal clinically important difference.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in DLQI Score at Week 16
The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QoL). It consists of 10 questions evaluating impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a participant's QoL over the prior week, including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the side effects of treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all/not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; and 3 = very much).
Item scores are added to provide a total score, ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater impairment of QoL.
the DLQI was administered to participants who were ≥ 16 (16 to 75) years old at the time of the Screening visit.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Adolescents: Percent Change From Baseline in SCORAD Score at Week 16
SCORAD is a clinical tool used to assess the extent and severity of eczema (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis). The extent is assessed using the rule of 9 to calculate the affected area (A) as a percentage of the whole body (0-100%). The intensity part of the SCORAD (B) consists of 6 items: erythema, oedema/papulation, excoriations, lichenification, oozing/crusts and dryness, each graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), for a total score of 0 to 18. Subjective items (C) include daily pruritus and sleeplessness, each scored on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 (total score 0-20). SCORAD is calculated as A/5 + 7B/2 + C, and ranges from 0 to 103 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving HADS-A Score and HADS-D Score of < 8 at Week 16
The HADS is a 14-item questionnaire, with seven items related to anxiety (HADS-A) and seven items related to depression (HADS-D). Each item is scored from 0 to 3; scores for each subscale range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating more distress. For each domain, scores 7 or lower are considered normal, 8 to 10 are borderline, and 11 or higher indicate clinical anxiety or depression.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a DLQI Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16
The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QoL). It consists of 10 questions evaluating impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a participant's QoL over the prior week, including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the side effects of treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all/not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; and 3 = very much).
Item scores are added to provide a total score, ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater impairment of QoL. A score of 0 or 1 means that the disease has no effect at all.
the DLQI was administered to participants who were ≥ 16 (16 to 75) years old at the time of the Screening visit.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Jun 2018
- Study start13 Aug 2018
- Primary completion6 Jan 2021
- Study completion10 Oct 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (15)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Atopic DermatitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by AbbVieThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 912 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- AbbVie
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- ABBVIE INC., Study director, AbbVie
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03569293
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- M16-045
- Other IDs
- 2022-502938-30-00, 2017-005125-20, 2017
- Acronym
- Measure Up 1
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 14 Jun 2018
- Last updated
- 17 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: AbbVie is committed to responsible clinical trial data sharing. This includes access to anonymized, individual and trial-level data (analysis data sets), as well as other information.
- Expanded access
- Available
Publications
Silverberg JI, Prajapati VH, Abraham S, Irvine AD, Gooderham MJ, Guttman-Yassky E, Tanizaki H, Rademaker M, Chen SH, Moreira A, Ta R, Lee WJ, Eyerich K. Achieving Minimal Disease Activity in Atopic Dermatitis Is Associated with Fewer Flares, Reduced Healthcare Resource Utilization, and Improved Disease Control: Analysis from the Real-World MEASURE-AD Study. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2026 Jul 30. doi: 10.1007/s13555-026-01865-0. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42530735Eyerich K, Mendes-Bastos P, Holzer G, Jain V, Katoh N, Luna PC, Segura PC, Lane M, Grada A, Moreira A, Bunick CG. Efficacy of Upadacitinib in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis of the Head and Neck Region. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2026 Jul;16(7):3461-3477. doi: 10.1007/s13555-026-01793-z. Epub 2026 May 24.
PubMed 42177735Irvine AD, Prajapati VH, Guttman-Yassky E, Simpson EL, Papp KA, Blauvelt A, Chu CY, Hong HC, Gold LFS, de Bruin-Weller M, Bieber T, Kabashima K, Rosmarin D, Sancho C, Calimlim BM, Grada A, Yang Y, Wu X, Levy G, Raymundo EM, Teixeira HD, Silverberg JI. Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial Results Through 140 Weeks. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2025 Nov;26(6):1003-1016. doi: 10.1007/s40257-025-00975-3. Epub 2025 Sep 3.
PubMed 40900410Burmester GR, Deodhar A, Irvine AD, Panaccione R, Winthrop KL, Vleugels RA, Levy G, Suravaram S, Palac H, Wegrzyn L, Ford S, Meerwein S, Guttman-Yassky E. Safety Profile of Upadacitinib: Descriptive Analysis in Over 27,000 Patient-Years Across Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, Axial Spondyloarthritis, Atopic Dermatitis, and Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Adv Ther. 2025 Oct;42(10):5215-5237. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03328-y. Epub 2025 Aug 28.
PubMed 40875187Simpson EL, Silverberg JI, Prajapati VH, Eyerich K, Katoh N, Boguniewicz M, Guttman-Yassky E, Song EJ, Lee WJ, Teixeira HD, Wu T, Sancho Sanchez C, Vigna N, Calimlim BM, de Bruin-Weller M. Rapid Itch Improvement and Skin Clearance with Upadacitinib Versus Placebo (Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2) and Versus Dupilumab (Heads Up): Results from Three Phase 3 Clinical Trials in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2025 Aug;15(8):2061-2076. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01443-w. Epub 2025 Jun 2.
PubMed 40457140Paller AS, Mendes-Bastos P, Siegfried E, Eichenfield LF, Soong W, Prajapati VH, Lio P, Simpson EL, Raymundo EM, Suravaram S, Hu X, Yang Y, Huang X, Calimlim BM, Platt AM, Su JC, Zheng M, Yamamoto-Hanada K, Teixeira HD, Irvine AD. Upadacitinib in Adolescents With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Analysis of 3 Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trials Through 76 Weeks. JAMA Dermatol. 2024 Dec 1;160(12):1304-1313. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.3696.
PubMed 39441580Blauvelt A, Eyerich K, Irvine AD, de Bruin-Weller M, Kwatra SG, Gooderham M, Kim B, Calimlim BM, Lee WJ, Raymundo EM, Liu Y, Ofori S, Platt AM, Silverberg JI. More Time Spent with Clear Skin and No Itch with Upadacitinib versus Dupilumab for Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 Sep;14(9):2621-2630. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01242-9. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
PubMed 39110139Simpson EL, Prajapati VH, Leshem YA, Chovatiya R, de Bruin-Weller MS, Stander S, Pink AE, Calimlim BM, Lee WJ, Teixeira H, Ladizinski B, Hu X, Yang Y, Liu Y, Liu M, Grada A, Platt AM, Silverberg JI. Upadacitinib Rapidly Improves Patient-Reported Outcomes in Atopic Dermatitis: 16-Week Results from Phase 3 Clinical Trials (Measure Up 1 and 2). Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 May;14(5):1127-1144. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01157-5. Epub 2024 May 2.
PubMed 38696027Silverberg JI, Gooderham MJ, Paller AS, Deleuran M, Bunick CG, Gold LFS, Hijnen D, Calimlim BM, Lee WJ, Teixeira HD, Hu X, Zhang S, Yang Y, Grada A, Platt AM, Thaci D. Early and Sustained Improvements in Symptoms and Quality of Life with Upadacitinib in Adults and Adolescents with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: 52-Week Results from Two Phase III Randomized Clinical Trials (Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2). Am J Clin Dermatol. 2024 May;25(3):485-496. doi: 10.1007/s40257-024-00853-4. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
PubMed 38528257Thyssen JP, Thaci D, Bieber T, Gooderham M, de Bruin-Weller M, Soong W, Kabashima K, Barbarot S, Luna PC, Xu J, Hu X, Liu Y, Raymundo EM, Calimlim BM, Nduaka C, Gamelli A, Simpson EL. Upadacitinib for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: Stratified analysis from three randomized phase 3 trials by key baseline characteristics. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2023 Sep;37(9):1871-1880. doi: 10.1111/jdv.19232. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
PubMed 37247226Paller AS, Ladizinski B, Mendes-Bastos P, Siegfried E, Soong W, Prajapati VH, Lio P, Thyssen JP, Simpson EL, Platt AM, Raymundo EM, Liu J, Calimlim BM, Huang X, Gu Y, Hu X, Yang Y, Su JC, Zheng M, Yamamoto-Hanada K, Teixeira HD, Irvine AD. Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib Treatment in Adolescents With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Analysis of the Measure Up 1, Measure Up 2, and AD Up Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Dermatol. 2023 May 1;159(5):526-535. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.0391.
PubMed 37043227Burmester GR, Cohen SB, Winthrop KL, Nash P, Irvine AD, Deodhar A, Mysler E, Tanaka Y, Liu J, Lacerda AP, Palac H, Shaw T, Mease PJ, Guttman-Yassky E. Safety profile of upadacitinib over 15 000 patient-years across rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and atopic dermatitis. RMD Open. 2023 Feb;9(1):e002735. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002735.
PubMed 36754548Mendes-Bastos P, Ladizinski B, Guttman-Yassky E, Jiang P, Liu J, Prajapati VH, Simpson EL, Vigna N, Teixeira HD, Barbarot S. Characterization of acne associated with upadacitinib treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: A post hoc integrated analysis of 3 phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022 Oct;87(4):784-791. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.06.012. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
PubMed 35714786Simpson EL, Papp KA, Blauvelt A, Chu CY, Hong HC, Katoh N, Calimlim BM, Thyssen JP, Chiou AS, Bissonnette R, Stein Gold LF, Wegzyn C, Hu X, Liu M, Liu J, Tenorio AR, Chu AD, Guttman-Yassky E. Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib in Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Analysis of Follow-up Data From the Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2 Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Dermatol. 2022 Apr 1;158(4):404-413. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.0029.
PubMed 35262646Guttman-Yassky E, Teixeira HD, Simpson EL, Papp KA, Pangan AL, Blauvelt A, Thaci D, Chu CY, Hong HC, Katoh N, Paller AS, Calimlim B, Gu Y, Hu X, Liu M, Yang Y, Liu J, Tenorio AR, Chu AD, Irvine AD. Once-daily upadacitinib versus placebo in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2): results from two replicate double-blind, randomised controlled phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2021 Jun 5;397(10290):2151-2168. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00588-2. Epub 2021 May 21.
PubMed 34023008