AzTrials
AzTrials

Atopic DermatitisPhase 3Measure Up 1NCT03569293

Evaluation of Upadacitinib in Adolescent and Adult Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis (Eczema)

A Phase 3 study testing Upadacitinib in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by AbbVie at 180 sites in 25 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib for the treatment of adolescent and adult participants with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) who are candidates for systemic therapy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Atopic Dermatitis
What is being tested?
Upadacitinib
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
912 participants
Where
180 sitesin 25 countries
Study dates
13 Aug 2018to 10 Oct 2025
Phase
Phase 3

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Body weight of ≥ 40 kg at Baseline Visit for participants between ≥ 12 and < 18 years of age
  • Chronic atopic dermatitis (AD) with onset of symptoms at least 3 years before Baseline Visit and subject meets Hanifin and Rajka criteria.
  • Active moderate to severe AD defined by:
  • Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score ≥ 16 at the Screening and Baseline Visits;
  • Validated Investigator's Global Assessment (vIGA) score ≥ 3 at the Screening and Baseline Visits;
  • ≥ 10% Body surface area (BSA) of AD involvement at the Screening and Baseline Visits;
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Baseline weekly average of daily Worst Pruritus NRS ≥ 4.
  • Candidate for systemic therapy or have recently required systemic therapy for AD
  • Subject has applied a topical emollient (moisturizer) twice daily for at least 7 days before the Baseline Visit.
  • Documented history of inadequate response to topical corticosteroids (TCS) or topical calcineurin inhibitor (TCI) or documented systemic treatment for AD within 6 months before Baseline Visit

Who cannot join

  • Prior exposure to any Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor
  • Unable or unwilling to discontinue current atopic dermatitis treatments prior to the study
  • Requirement of prohibited medications during the study
  • Other active skin diseases or skin infections requiring systemic treatment or would interfere with appropriate assessment of atopic dermatitis lesions
  • Female subject who is pregnant, breastfeeding, or considering pregnancy during the study

Trial locations and contacts

180 sites in 25 countries.

180 sites in 25 countries

United States58 sites
  • Arlington Research Center, Inc /ID# 200391

    Arlington, Texas, 76011

  • Orion Clinical Research /ID# 204703

    Austin, Texas, 78759-4100

  • Bakersfield Derma & Skin Cance /ID# 200433

    Bakersfield, California, 93309

  • Northeast Dermatology /ID# 201338

    Beverly, Massachusetts, 01915

  • Clearlyderm Dermatology /ID# 208371

    Boca Raton, Florida, 33428

  • Skin Care Research, LLC /ID# 200811

    Boca Raton, Florida, 33486-2269

  • Massachusetts General Hospital /ID# 200474

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

  • Christie Clinic, LLC /ID# 200427

    Champaign, Illinois, 61820

  • Coastal Clinical Research Center of the Carolinas /ID# 200402

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29414

  • Clin Res Inst of Michigan, LLC /ID# 208019

    Chesterfield, Michigan, 48047

  • Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine /ID# 201644

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611-2927

  • Olympian Clinical Research /ID# 202914

    Clearwater, Florida, 33756

  • Velocity clinical research /ID# 202653

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44122

  • Clinical Trials Management, LLC - Covington /ID# 212658

    Covington, Louisiana, 70433

  • Modern Research Associates, PL /ID# 200705

    Dallas, Texas, 75231

  • Menter Dermatology Res Inst /ID# 200390

    Dallas, Texas, 75246

  • Henry Ford Medical Center /ID# 204191

    Detroit, Michigan, 48202-3046

  • First OC Dermatology /ID# 201910

    Fountain Valley, California, 92708-3701

  • Dermdox Dermatology Centers, PC /ID# 213782

    Hazleton, Pennsylvania, 18201

  • Dawes Fretzin, LLC /ID# 200366

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46256

  • Clinical Partners, LLC /ID# 200460

    Johnston, Rhode Island, 02919

  • Forest Hills Dermatology Group /ID# 209244

    Kew Gardens, New York, 11415

  • Cleaver Dermatology /ID# 202825

    Kirksville, Missouri, 63501-5362

  • Multi-Speciality Research Associates /ID# 213254

    Lake City, Florida, 32055-8835

  • Clinical Research Consortium /ID# 200734

    Las Vegas, Nevada, 89119-5190

  • California Allergy and Asthma Medical Group /ID# 200727

    Los Angeles, California, 90025-7014

  • GSI Clinical Research, LLC /ID# 200849

    Margate, Florida, 33063

  • Clinical Trials Management, LLC - Metairie /ID# 212659

    Metairie, Louisiana, 70006-4165

  • Florida International Rsrch cr /ID# 218507

    Miami, Florida, 33173

  • Allergy & Asthma Associates of Southern California /ID# 200733

    Mission Viejo, California, 92691-6410

  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai /ID# 200370

    New York, New York, 10029-6504

  • Dermatology Clinical Trials /ID# 205876

    Newport Beach, California, 92660-7853

  • Tory P Sullivan, MD PA /ID# 200671

    North Miami Beach, Florida, 33162-4708

  • Lynn Health Science Institute (LHSI) /ID# 212676

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73112

  • Newton Clinical Research /ID# 204169

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73120-5049

  • Advanced Dermatology of the Midlands /ID# 201689

    Omaha, Nebraska, 68144-1105

  • Leavitt Medical Associates of Florida /ID# 200880

    Ormond Beach, Florida, 32174

  • Alliance Dermatology and MOHs /ID# 200375

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85032

  • Oregon Medical Res Center PC /ID# 200428

    Portland, Oregon, 97223

  • Oregon Health and Science University /ID# 200992

    Portland, Oregon, 97239

  • AllCutis Research Inc /ID# 200981

    Portsmouth, New Hampshire, 03801

  • Integrated Dermatology of Massachusetts, LLC /ID# 209468

    Quincy, Massachusetts, 02169

  • UC Davis /ID# 203622

    Sacramento, California, 95817

  • Synergy Dermatology /ID# 200842

    San Francisco, California, 94132-1909

  • San Luis Derm and Laser Clinic /ID# 200372

    San Luis Obispo, California, 93405

  • Clear Dermatology & Aesthetics Center /ID# 201256

    Scottsdale, Arizona, 85255-4134

  • Dermatology Physicians of Connecticut /ID# 200928

    Shelton, Connecticut, 06484-6211

  • The South Bend Clinic Center /ID# 200371

    South Bend, Indiana, 46617

  • Dermatology Specialists of Spokane /ID# 202068

    Spokane, Washington, 99202

  • Stanford University /ID# 200440

    Stanford, California, 94305

  • Precision Clinical Research /ID# 209002

    Sunrise, Florida, 33351-7311

  • Montefiore Medical Center /ID# 200456

    The Bronx, New York, 10467

  • J. Schwartz, MD, PLLC /ID# 202121

    Troy, New York, 12180-2323

  • Care Access Research - Walnut Creek /ID# 200940

    Walnut Creek, California, 94598-2488

  • Foxhall Research Center /ID# 213682

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20016-4300

  • Duplicate_George Washington Univ Med /ID# 200364

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20037

  • Center for Clinical Studies - Webster TX /ID# 203185

    Webster, Texas, 77598

  • Integrated Clinical Research LLC /ID# 200900

    West Palm Beach, Florida, 33406-6063

Other trials in United States

Canada15 sites
  • Kirk Barber Research, CA /ID# 200324

    Calgary, Alberta, T2G 1B1

  • Dermatology Research Institute Inc. /ID# 200318

    Calgary, Alberta, T2J 7E1

  • Dr. Irina Turchin PC Inc. /ID# 200322

    Fredericton, New Brunswick, E3B 1G9

  • Hamilton Health Sciences - McMaster University Medical Centre /ID# 200313

    Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1

  • Dr. Wei Jing Loo Medicine Prof /ID# 206051

    London, Ontario, N6H 5L5

  • Lynderm Research Inc. /ID# 200315

    Markham, Ontario, L3P 1X2

  • Innovaderm Research Inc. /ID# 200320

    Montreal, Quebec, H2X 2V1

  • Dr. David Gratton Dermat Inc. /ID# 200309

    Montreal, Quebec, H3H 1V4

  • Dermatology Ottawa Research Centre /ID# 200319

    Ottawa, Ontario, K2C 3N2

  • Dre Angelique Gagne-Henley M.D. inc. /ID# 200326

    Saint-Jérôme, Quebec, J7Z 7E2

  • Karma Clinical Trials /ID# 200316

    St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, A1A 4Y3

  • Dr. Chih-ho Hong Medical Inc. /ID# 200311

    Surrey, British Columbia, V3R 6A7

  • Enverus Medical Research /ID# 200307

    Surrey, British Columbia, V3V 0C6

  • K. Papp Clinical Research /ID# 200317

    Waterloo, Ontario, N2J 1C4

  • Wiseman Dermatology Research /ID# 200323

    Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3M 3Z4

Other trials in Canada

Japan11 sites
  • University of Yamanashi Hospital /ID# 204174

    Chuo-shi, Yamanashi, 409-3821

  • Fukuoka University Hospital /ID# 201309

    Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 814-0180

  • Kyushu Central Hospital of the Mutual Aid Association of Public School Teachers /ID# 202891

    Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 815-8588

  • Gifu University Hospital /ID# 201760

    Gifu, Gifu, 501-1194

  • University Hospital Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine /ID# 201876

    Kyoto, Kyoto, 602-8566

  • Aichi Medical University Hospital /ID# 202833

    Nagakute-shi, Aichi-ken, 480-1195

  • Takagi Dermatology Clinic /ID# 201238

    Obihiro-shi, Hokkaido, 080-0013

  • Ogaki Municipal Hospital /ID# 203463

    Ogaki-shi, Gifu, 503-8502

  • Kume Clinic /ID# 201912

    Sakai-shi, Osaka, 5938324

  • Medical Cooperation Kojinkai Sapporo Skin Clinic /ID# 201239

    Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0063

  • NTT Medical Center Tokyo /ID# 201759

    Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 141-8625

Other trials in Japan

China10 sites
  • Peking University People's Hospital /ID# 202549

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100044

  • Peking University Third Hospital /ID# 202612

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100191

  • Beijing Friendship Hospital /ID# 202601

    Beijing, 100032

  • Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University /ID# 208597

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510120

  • The Third Affiliated Hospital Of Sun Yat-Sen University /ID# 202548

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510630

  • The second Affiliated hospital of Zhejiang University school of Medicine /ID# 202608

    Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310009

  • Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine /ID# 202554

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200065

  • Huashan Hospital of Fudan University /ID# 205760

    Shanghai, 200040

  • The First Hospital of China Medical University /ID# 202615

    Shenyang, Liaoning, 110001

  • Union Hospital affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Sc /ID# 208598

    Wuhan, 420022

Other trials in China

Germany9 sites
  • Universitaetsklinikum Bonn /ID# 202086

    Bonn, 53127

  • Universitaetsklinikum Frankfurt /ID# 202089

    Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, 60590

  • TFS Trial Form Support GmbH /ID# 202083

    Hamburg, 20537

  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover /ID# 202091

    Hanover, 30625

  • Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel /ID# 202255

    Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, 24105

  • Universitaetsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universitaet Mainz /ID# 205192

    Mainz, 55131

  • Duplicate_Klinikum rechts der Isar - Technische Universitaet Muenchen /ID# 202087

    Munich, Bavaria, 80802

  • Universitaetsklinikum Muenster /ID# 202085

    Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, 48149

  • CMS3 Company for Medical Study /ID# 205193

    Selters, Rhineland-Palatinate, 56242

Other trials in Germany

France8 sites
  • Centre Hospitalier du Mans /ID# 205991

    Le Mans, Sarthe, 72037

  • Hopital Saint Vincent de Paul /ID# 218253

    Lille, 59020

  • Le Bateau BLanc /ID# 206833

    Martigues, 13500

  • CHU de Nantes, Hotel Dieu -HME /ID# 206377

    Nantes, Pays de la Loire Region, 44000

  • AP-HP - Hopital Necker /ID# 218364

    Paris, 75015

  • HCL - Hôpital Lyon Sud /ID# 201529

    Pierre-Bénite, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, 69495

  • Hôpital Charles-Nicolle /ID# 201525

    Rouen, 76000

  • CHU Toulouse - Hopital Larrey /ID# 201528

    Toulouse, 31400

Other trials in France

Italy6 sites
  • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona /ID# 200692

    Ancona, 60126

  • A.O.U. di Bologna Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi /ID# 200746

    Bologna, 40138

  • A.O.U. Policlinico G. Rodolico S.Marco- Presidio G.Rodolico /ID# 200741

    Catania, 95123

  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Federico II /ID# 200750

    Naples, 80131

  • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana-Stabilimento di Santa Chiara /ID# 200695

    Pisa, 56126

  • Fondazione PTV Policlinico Tor Vergata /ID# 201136

    Rome, Roma, 00133

Other trials in Italy

Australia5 sites
  • Skin Health Institute Inc /ID# 204791

    Carlton, Victoria, 3053

  • Holdsworth House Medical Practice /ID# 211236

    Darlinghurst, New South Wales, 2010

  • Fremantle Dermatology /ID# 205305

    Fremantle, Western Australia, 6160

  • North Eastern Health Specialists /ID# 205802

    Hectorville, South Australia, 5073

  • Woden Dermatology /ID# 205799

    Phillip, Australian Capital Territory, 2606

Other trials in Australia

Croatia5 sites
  • Duplicate_Klinicki bolnicki centar Osijek /ID# 201523

    Osijek, County of Osijek-Baranja, 31000

  • Klinicki bolnicki centar Rijeka /ID# 217423

    Rijeka, Primorje-Gorski Kotar County, 51000

  • Klinicki bolnicki centar Split /ID# 201527

    Split, Split-Dalmatia County, 21000

  • Klinicki bolnicki centar Zagreb /ID# 201879

    Zagreb, City of Zagreb, 10000

  • Klinika za dječje bolesti Zagreb /ID# 203151

    Zagreb, City of Zagreb, 10000

Other trials in Croatia

Russia5 sites
  • Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Dermatovenerologic Dispensary /ID# 201996

    Chelyabinsk, Chelyabinsk Oblast, 454048

  • Clinical Dermatovenerology Dispensary /ID# 203439

    Krasnodar, Krasnodarskiy Kray, 350020

  • National Medical Research Center for Children's Health /ID# 203440

    Moscow, 119296

  • Saratov State Medical University n.a. V.I. Razumovskiy /ID# 201595

    Saratov, Saratov Oblast, 410012

  • Ural Research Institute of dermatovenerology and immunopathology /ID# 201593

    Yekaterinburg, Sverdlovsk Oblast, 620076

Other trials in Russia

Switzerland5 sites
  • Universitätsspital Basel /ID# 201599

    Basel, Canton of Basel-City, 4031

  • Inselspital, Universitätsspital Bern /ID# 201598

    Bern, 3010

  • Hôpitaux Universitaires Genève /ID# 201600

    Geneva, Canton of Geneva, 1205

  • CHUV, Centre hospitalier universitaire vaudois /ID# 200910

    Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, 1011

  • CHUV, Centre hospitalier universitaire vaudois /ID# 206505

    Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, 1011

Other trials in Switzerland

United Kingdom5 sites
  • West Middlesex University Hospital /ID# 202273

    Isleworth, London, City of, TW7 6AF

  • Barts Health NHS Trust /ID# 201043

    London, London, City of, E1 2ES

  • Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust /ID# 201192

    London, London, City of, SE1 9RT

  • Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust9 /ID# 201971

    London, SW10 9NH

  • Northern Care Alliance NHS Group /ID# 201194

    Salford, M6 8HD

Other trials in United Kingdom

Bosnia and Herzegovina4 sites
  • University Clinical Centre of the Republic of Srpska /ID# 202666

    Banja Luka, Republika Srpska, 78000

  • University Clinical Centre of the Republic of Srpska /ID# 202667

    Banja Luka, Republika Srpska, 78000

  • Clinical Center University of Sarajevo /ID# 202668

    Sarajevo, 71000

  • Clinical Center University of Sarajevo /ID# 202669

    Sarajevo, 71000

Other trials in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Colombia4 sites
  • Ctr Int de Reum del Caribe SAS /ID# 201620

    Barranquilla, Atlántico, 80002

  • Clinisalud del sur /ID# 218100

    Medellín, Antioquia, 055422

  • Fundacion Centro de Excelencia en Enfermedades Cronicas no Transmisibles - FUNCE /ID# 201905

    Montería, Departamento de Córdoba, 230002

  • Fundacion Hospital San Vicente de Paul - Rionegro /ID# 202043

    Rionegro, Antioquia, 054040

Other trials in Colombia

Turkey (Türkiye)4 sites
  • Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine /ID# 204099

    Ankara, 06100

  • Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty /ID# 204100

    Istanbul, 34098

  • Erciyes University Medical Fac /ID# 204098

    Melikgazi, Kayseri, 38030

  • Gazi Universitesi Tip Fakultes /ID# 204176

    Yenimahalle, 06560

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

Argentina3 sites
  • Instituto de Neumonología y Dermatología /ID# 203444

    Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aire, Ciuadad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, 1425

  • Psoriahue Med Interdisciplinar /ID# 202451

    Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aire, Ciuadad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, 1425

  • Framingham Centro Medico /ID# 202688

    La Plata, Buenos Aires, 1902

Other trials in Argentina

Bulgaria3 sites
  • UMHAT Dr Georgi Stranski EAD /ID# 201521

    Pleven, 5800

  • UMHAT Alexandrovska EAD /ID# 201519

    Sofia, 1431

  • UMHAT Professor Stoyan Kirkovich /ID# 201522

    Stara Zagora, 6000

Other trials in Bulgaria

Denmark3 sites
  • Aarhus University Hospital /ID# 200737

    Aarhus N, Central Jutland, 8200

  • Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital /ID# 200979

    Copenhagen NV, Capital Region, 2400

  • Herlev and Gentofte Hospital /ID# 200736

    Hellerup, Capital Region, 2900

Other trials in Denmark

Estonia3 sites
  • North Estonia Medical Centre /ID# 200951

    Mustamäe, Harju, 13419

  • Confido Private Medical Clinic /ID# 200846

    Tallinn, Harju, 11313

  • Tartu University Hospital /ID# 200847

    Tartu, Tartu, 50406

Other trials in Estonia

Finland3 sites
  • Kuopio University Hospital /ID# 202449

    Kuopio, 70210

  • Terveystalo Tampere /ID# 201117

    Tampere, 33100

  • Mehiläinen Neo /ID# 201116

    Turku, Southwest Finland, 20520

Other trials in Finland

Malaysia3 sites
  • Hospital Selayang /ID# 204378

    Batu Caves, Selangor, 68100

  • Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun /ID# 204375

    Ipoh, Perak, 30450

  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital /ID# 204379

    Kota Kinabalu, Division Pantai Barat Utara, Sabah, 88200

Other trials in Malaysia

Puerto Rico3 sites
  • Cruz-Santana, Carolina, PR /ID# 201096

    Carolina, 00985

  • Ponce Medical School Foundation /ID# 201821

    Ponce, 00716-0377

  • Clinical Research Puerto Rico /ID# 203309

    San Juan, 00909

Other trials in Puerto Rico

Romania2 sites
  • Spitalul Clinic Colentina /ID# 205860

    Bucharest, 020121

  • Cabinet Medical de Dermatovenerologie Dr. Remus Orasan /ID# 205862

    Cluj-Napoca, 400105

Other trials in Romania

Ukraine2 sites
  • ME "Rivne Regional Dermatology and Venereology Dispensary" of RRC /ID# 210504

    Rivne, 33028

  • Military Hospital of Military-Medical Clinical Center of Southern Region /ID# 201962

    Zaporizhzhya, Zaporizhzhia Oblast, 69063

Other trials in Ukraine

New Zealand1 site
  • Clinical Trials NZ /ID# 205335

    Hamilton, 3204

Other trials in New Zealand

About this study

Official title: A Phase 3 Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate Upadacitinib in Adolescent and Adult Subjects With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis

The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib for the treatment of adolescent and adult participants with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) who are candidates for systemic therapy.

Read the detailed description

This study includes a 35-day screening period, a 16-week double-blind period, a blinded extension period up to Week 260, and a 30-day follow-up visit.

Participants who meet eligibility criteria in the main study will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive a daily oral dose of upadacitinib 30 mg or upadacitinib 15 mg or matching placebo. Upon completion of enrollment of 810 participants in the main study, a supplemental study will continue to enroll adolescents (adolescent sub-study) until a total of 180 adolescent participants are enrolled in the overall study (main study + adolescent sub-study).

Randomization for the main study will be stratified by baseline disease severity (validated Investigator Global Assessment scale for Atopic Dermatitis [vIGA-AD] score of moderate [3] versus severe [4]), by geographic region (United States [US]/Puerto Rico/Canada, Japan, China, and Other), and by age (adolescent [ages 12 to 17] versus adult [ages 18 to 75]). The separate randomization for the adolescent sub-study will be stratified by baseline disease severity (moderate [vIGA-AD 3] vs. severe [vIGA-AD 4]) and by geographic region (US/Puerto Rico/Canada and Other).

At Week 16 of the main study and the adolescent sub-study, participants in the placebo group will be re-randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive daily oral doses of upadacitinib 30 mg or upadacitinib 15 mg in the blinded extension period. In the main study the re-randomization at Week 16 will be stratified by Week 16 50% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index [EASI 50] responder [yes/no], geographic region [US/Puerto Rico/Canada, China [Mainland], Japan, and other], and age group [adolescent/adult]. For the adolescent sub-study, the re-randomization will be stratified by EASI 50 responder (Yes/No) and by geographic region (US/Puerto Rico/Canada and Other).

Participants originally randomized to upadacitinib will continue upadacitinib in the extension period at the same dose.

Starting at the Week 4 visit, rescue treatment for AD may be provided at the discretion of the investigator if medically necessary.

The Primary Analysis for the main study will be conducted after all ongoing participants have completed Week 16. In addition, a Primary Analysis for the adolescent population (including the adolescent participants from the main study and the adolescent sub-study) will be conducted after all ongoing adolescent participants have completed Week 16.

Following the interim analysis, significant noncompliance was identified at a clinical site. As a result, all data from the site, including data from 10 adolescent participants, has been excluded from the final analysis of the outcome measures as appropriate.

Being tested
Placebo for Upadacitinib, Upadacitinib
Keywords
Atopic Dermatitis, Upadacitinib
Medical subject headings
Dermatitis, Atopic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Placebo for UpadacitinibDrug

    Tablets taken orally once a day

  • UpadacitinibDrug

    Also called ABT-494, RINVOQ™

    Tablets taken orally once a day

Study groups in NCT03569293
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Placebo / UpadacitinibPlacebo comparatorParticipants will receive placebo orally once a day (QD) for 16 weeks in the double-blind treatment period. At Week 16 participants will be re-randomized to receive either upadacitinib 15 mg or upadacitinib 30 mg QD up to Week 260.
Receives: Drug: Placebo for Upadacitinib; Drug: Upadacitinib
Upadacitinib 15 mg QDExperimentalParticipants will receive upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for up to 260 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Upadacitinib
Upadacitinib 30 mg QDExperimentalParticipants will receive upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for up to 260 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Upadacitinib

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 75% Reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index Score (EASI 75) From Baseline at Week 16

    EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).

    The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  2. Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD) of 0 or 1 With a Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 2 Points at Week 16

    The vIGA-AD is a validated assessment instrument to rate the severity of atopic dermatitis globally, based on the following scale:

    • 0 - Clear: No inflammatory signs of AD;
    • 1 - Almost clear: Barely perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification;
    • 2 - Mild: Slight but definite erythema, induration/papulation and/or minimal lichenification. No oozing or crusting;
    • 3 - Moderate: Clearly perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification, oozing or crusting may be present;
    • 4 - Severe: Marked erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification; Oozing or crusting may be present.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

Secondary outcomes (44)
  1. Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16

    Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). Pruritus NRS was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores.

    Measured: Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 16

  2. Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a 90% Reduction From Baseline in EASI Score (EASI 90) at Week 16

    EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).

    The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  3. Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Week 4

    Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). Pruritus NRS was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores.

    Measured: Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 4

  4. Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving an EASI 75 Response at Week 2

    EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).

    The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.

    An EASI 75 response is defined as at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in EASI score.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 2

  5. Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Week 1

    Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). Pruritus NRS was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores.

    Measured: Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 1

  6. Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Day 2

    Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch).

    The percentage of participants who had a 4-point or greater improvement from Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS score at Day 2 was pre-specified as a ranked secondary endpoint for participants in the upadacitinib 30 mg group versus placebo group only.

    Measured: Baseline and Day 2

  7. Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Day 3

    Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch).

    The percentage of participants who had a 4-point or greater improvement in Worst Pruritus NRS score from Baseline at Day 3 was pre-specified as a ranked secondary endpoint for participants in the upadacitinib 15 mg group versus placebo group only.

    Measured: Baseline and Day 3

  8. Main Study: Percentage of Participants Experiencing a Flare During the Double-blind Treatment Period

    A flare, characterized as a clinically meaningful worsening in EASI, is defined as an increase in EASI score of ≥ 6.6 points from Baseline during the double-blind treatment period and prior to use of any rescue medication. Flare was assessed in participants with an EASI score of 65.4 or less at Baseline.

    Measured: From first dose of study drug to Week 16

  9. Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 12 Points From Baseline in Atopic Dermatitis Impact Scale (ADerm-IS) Sleep Domain Score at Week 16

    The ADerm-IS is a 10-item patient reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire designed to assess a variety of impacts that participants experience from their AD.

    The ADerm-IS sleep domain consists of 3 questions designed to assess the impact of AD on sleep on a daily basis over a 24-hour recall period. The items include difficulty falling asleep, impact on sleep, and waking at night. Each question is scored on an 11-point NRS from 0 (no impact) to 10 (extreme impact). The ADerm-IS sleep domain score is the sum of the 3 item scores and ranges from 0 (no impact) to 30 (worst impact). The ADerm-IS sleep domain was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores.

    The minimal clinically important difference for ADerm-IS sleep domain score is 12.

    Measured: Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 16

  10. Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Atopic Dermatitis Symptom Scale (ADerm-SS) Skin Pain Score at Week 16

    The ADerm-SS is an 11-item PRO questionnaire designed to assess signs and symptoms that patients may experience due to AD using a 24-hour recall period. For the skin pain item participants were asked on a daily basis to indicate how bad their worst skin pain due to AD was in the past 24 hours on an NRS from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). The ADerm-SS skin pain score was analyzed using weekly rolling averages of daily scores. The minimal clinically important difference for ADerm-SS skin pain score is 4.

    Measured: Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 16

  11. Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 28 Points From Baseline in ADerm-SS 7-Item Total Symptom Score (TSS-7) at Week 16

    The ADerm-SS is an 11-item questionnaire designed to assess signs and symptoms that participants may experience due to AD using a 24-hour recall period. The 7-item total symptom score includes 7 symptoms (items 1-7 of the ADerm-SS), each assessed on a NRS from 0 (no symptom) to 10 (worst imaginable). The 7 symptoms included in the score are itch while asleep, itch while awake, skin pain (each assessed daily), skin cracking, skin cracking pain, dry skin, and skin flaking (assessed weekly). The TSS-7 score ranges from 0 to 70, with higher scores indicating worsening symptoms. The minimal clinically important difference for ADerm-SS TSS-7 is 28.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  12. Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 11 Points From Baseline in ADerm-IS Emotional State Domain Score at Week 16

    The ADerm-IS is a 10-item PRO questionnaire designed to assess a variety of impacts that participants experience from their AD.

    ADerm-IS emotional state sums three items [Items 8-10] measuring self-consciousness, embarrassment, and sadness with a 7-day recall. Each question is scored on an 11-point NRS from 0 (no impact) to 10 (extreme impact). The emotional state domain score ranges from 0 to 30, where higher scores represent worst impact.

    The minimal clinically important difference for ADerm-IS emotional state domain score is 11.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  13. Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 14 Points From Baseline in in ADerm-IS Daily Activities Domain Score at Week 16

    The ADerm-IS is a 10-item PRO questionnaire designed to assess a variety of impacts that participants experience from their AD.

    ADerm-IS daily activities sums four items measuring limitations of household, physical, and social activities, and difficulty concentrating with a 7-day recall. Each question is scored on an 11-point NRS from 0 (no impact) to 10 (extreme impact). The daily activities domain score ranges from 0 to 40, where higher scores represent worst impact.

    The minimal clinically important difference for the ADerm-IS daily activities domain score is 14.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  14. Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a 100% Reduction From Baseline in EASI Score (EASI 100) at Week 16

    EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).

    The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  15. Main Study: Percent Change From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Week 16

    Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). Pruritus NRS was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 16

  16. Main Study: Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score at Week 16

    EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1)] moderate [2], or severe [3]) for Redness (erythema, inflammation), Thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), Scratching (excoriation), and Lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).

    The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease; a negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  17. Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Total Score at Week 16

    The POEM is a 7-item, validated questionnaire used to assess disease symptoms in both children and adults. Participants respond to 7 questions, including dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding, and weeping, each scored on a 5-point scale based on frequency of occurrence during the previous week: 0 = no days, 1 = 1 to 2 days, 2 = 3 to 4 days, 3 = 5 to 6 days, and 4 = all days. Item scores are added to provide a total score ranging from 0 (clear) to 28 (very severe atopic eczema). A change in POEM score of 3.4 points is considered the minimal clinically important difference.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  18. Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 16

    The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QoL). It consists of 10 questions evaluating impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a participant's QoL over the prior week, including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the side effects of treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all/not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; and 3 = very much).

    Item scores are added to provide a total score, ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater impairment of QoL.

    the DLQI was administered to participants who were ≥ 16 (16 to 75) years old at the time of the Screening visit.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  19. Main Study: Percent Change From Baseline in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score at Week 16

    SCORAD is a clinical tool used to assess the extent and severity of eczema (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis). The extent is assessed using the rule of 9 to calculate the affected area (A) as a percentage of the whole body (0-100%). The intensity part of the SCORAD (B) consists of 6 items: erythema, oedema/papulation, excoriations, lichenification, oozing/crusts and dryness, each graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), for a total score of 0 to 18. Subjective items (C) include daily pruritus and sleeplessness, each scored on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 (total score 0-20). SCORAD is calculated as A/5 + 7B/2 + C, and ranges from 0 to 103 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  20. Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety (HADS-A) Score and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression (HADS-D) Score of < 8 at Week 16

    The HADS is a 14-item questionnaire, with seven items related to anxiety (HADS-A) and seven items related to depression (HADS-D). Each item is scored from 0 to 3; scores for each subscale range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating more distress. For each domain, scores 7 or lower are considered normal, 8 to 10 are borderline, and 11 or higher indicate clinical anxiety or depression.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  21. Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a DLQI Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16

    The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QoL). It consists of 10 questions evaluating impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a participant's QoL over the prior week, including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the side effects of treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all/not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; and 3 = very much).

    Item scores are added to provide a total score, ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater impairment of QoL. A score of 0 or 1 means that the disease has no effect at all.

    the DLQI was administered to participants who were ≥ 16 (16 to 75) years old at the time of the Screening visit.

    Measured: Week 16

  22. Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving an EASI 75 Response at Week 16

    EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).

    The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.

    An EASI 75 response is defined as at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in EASI score.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  23. Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a vIGA-AD of 0 or 1 With a Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 2 Points at Week 16

    The vIGA-AD is a validated assessment instrument to rate the severity of atopic dermatitis globally, based on the following scale:

    • 0 - Clear: No signs of AD;
    • 1 - Almost clear: Barely perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification;
    • 2 - Mild: Slight but definite erythema, induration/papulation and/or minimal lichenification. No oozing or crusting;
    • 3 - Moderate: Clearly perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification, possible oozing or crusting;
    • 4 - Severe: Marked erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification; possible oozing or crusting.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  24. Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Week 16

    Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). Worst pruritus NRS was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores.

    Measured: Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 16

  25. Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving an EASI 90 Response at Week 16

    EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).

    The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.

    An EASI 90 response is defined as at least a 90% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in EASI score.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  26. Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Week 4

    Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). Worst pruritus NRS was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores.

    Measured: Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 4

  27. Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving an EASI 75 Response at Week 2

    EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).

    The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.

    An EASI 75 response is defined as at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in EASI score.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 2

  28. Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Week 1

    Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). Worst pruritus NRS was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores.

    Measured: Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 1

  29. Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Day 2

    Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch).

    Measured: Baseline and Day 2

  30. Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Day 3

    Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch).

    Measured: Baseline and Day 3

  31. Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Experiencing a Flare During the Double-blind Treatment Period

    A flare, characterized as a clinically meaningful worsening in EASI, is defined as an increase in EASI score of ≥ 6.6 points from Baseline during the double-blind treatment period and prior to use of any rescue medication. Flares were assessed in participants with an EASI score of 65.4 or less at Baseline.

    Measured: From first dose of study drug to Week 16

  32. Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 12 Points From Baseline in ADerm-IS Sleep Domain Score at Week 16

    The ADerm-IS is a 10-item patient reported outcome questionnaire designed to assess a variety of impacts that participants experience from their AD.

    The ADerm-IS sleep domain consists of 3 questions designed to assess the impact of AD on sleep on a daily basis over a 24-hour recall period. The items include difficulty falling asleep, impact on sleep, and waking at night. Each question is scored on an 11-point NRS from 0 (no impact) to 10 (extreme impact). The ADerm-IS sleep domain score is the sum of the 3 item scores and ranges from 0 (no impact) to 30 (worst impact). The ADerm-IS sleep domain was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores.

    The minimal clinically important difference for ADerm-IS sleep domain score is 12.

    Measured: Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 16

  33. Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in ADerm-SS Skin Pain Score at Week 16

    The ADerm-SS is an 11-item PRO questionnaire designed to assess signs and symptoms that patients may experience due to AD using a 24-hour recall period. For the skin pain item participants were asked to indicate on a daily basis how bad their worst skin pain due to AD was in the past 24 hours on an NRS from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). The minimal clinically important difference for ADerm-SS skin pain score is 4.

    The ADerm-SS skin pain score was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores.

    Measured: Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 16

  34. Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 28 Points From Baseline in ADerm-SS TSS-7 at Week 16

    The ADerm-SS is an 11-item questionnaire designed to assess signs and symptoms that participants may experience due to AD using a 24-hour recall period. The 7-item total symptom score includes 7 symptoms (items 1-7 of the ADerm-SS), each assessed on a NRS from 0 (no symptom) to 10 (worst imaginable). The 7 symptoms included in the score are itch while asleep, itch while awake, skin pain (each assessed daily), skin cracking, skin cracking pain, dry skin, and skin flaking (assessed weekly). The TSS-7 score ranges from 0 to 70, with higher scores indicating worsening symptoms. The minimal clinically important difference for ADerm-SS TSS-7 is 28.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  35. Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 11 Points From Baseline in ADerm-IS Emotional State Domain Score at Week 16

    The ADerm-IS is a 10-item PRO questionnaire designed to assess a variety of impacts that participants experience from their AD.

    ADerm-IS emotional state sums three items [Items 8-10] measuring self-consciousness, embarrassment, and sadness with a 7-day recall. Each question is scored on an 11-point NRS from 0 (no impact) to 10 (extreme impact). The emotional state domain score ranges from 0 to 30, where higher scores represent worst impact.

    The minimal clinically important difference for ADerm-IS emotional state domain score is 11.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  36. Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 14 Points From Baseline in ADerm-IS Daily Activities Domain Score at Week 16

    The ADerm-IS is a 10-item PRO questionnaire designed to assess a variety of impacts that participants experience from their AD.

    ADerm-IS daily activities sums four items measuring limitations of household, physical, and social activities, and difficulty concentrating with a 7-day recall. Each question is scored on an 11-point NRS from 0 (no impact) to 10 (extreme impact). The daily activities domain score ranges from 0 to 40, where higher scores represent worst impact.

    The minimal clinically important difference for the ADerm-IS daily activities domain score is 14.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  37. Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving an EASI 100 Response at Week 16

    EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).

    The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.

    An EASI 100 response is defined as a 100% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in EASI score.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  38. Adolescents: Percent Change From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Week 16

    Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). Pruritus NRS was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 16

  39. Adolescents: Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score at Week 16

    EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1)] moderate [2], or severe [3]) for Redness (erythema, inflammation), Thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), Scratching (excoriation), and Lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).

    The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease; a negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  40. Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in POEM Total Score at Week 16

    The POEM is a 7-item, validated questionnaire used to assess disease symptoms in both children and adults. Participants respond to 7 questions, including dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding, and weeping, each scored on a 5-point scale based on frequency of occurrence during the previous week: 0 = no days, 1 = 1 to 2 days, 2 = 3 to 4 days, 3 = 5 to 6 days, and 4 = all days. Item scores are added to provide a total score ranging from 0 (clear) to 28 (very severe atopic eczema). A change in POEM score of 3.4 points is considered the minimal clinically important difference.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  41. Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in DLQI Score at Week 16

    The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QoL). It consists of 10 questions evaluating impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a participant's QoL over the prior week, including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the side effects of treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all/not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; and 3 = very much).

    Item scores are added to provide a total score, ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater impairment of QoL.

    the DLQI was administered to participants who were ≥ 16 (16 to 75) years old at the time of the Screening visit.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  42. Adolescents: Percent Change From Baseline in SCORAD Score at Week 16

    SCORAD is a clinical tool used to assess the extent and severity of eczema (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis). The extent is assessed using the rule of 9 to calculate the affected area (A) as a percentage of the whole body (0-100%). The intensity part of the SCORAD (B) consists of 6 items: erythema, oedema/papulation, excoriations, lichenification, oozing/crusts and dryness, each graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), for a total score of 0 to 18. Subjective items (C) include daily pruritus and sleeplessness, each scored on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 (total score 0-20). SCORAD is calculated as A/5 + 7B/2 + C, and ranges from 0 to 103 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  43. Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving HADS-A Score and HADS-D Score of < 8 at Week 16

    The HADS is a 14-item questionnaire, with seven items related to anxiety (HADS-A) and seven items related to depression (HADS-D). Each item is scored from 0 to 3; scores for each subscale range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating more distress. For each domain, scores 7 or lower are considered normal, 8 to 10 are borderline, and 11 or higher indicate clinical anxiety or depression.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  44. Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a DLQI Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16

    The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QoL). It consists of 10 questions evaluating impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a participant's QoL over the prior week, including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the side effects of treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all/not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; and 3 = very much).

    Item scores are added to provide a total score, ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater impairment of QoL. A score of 0 or 1 means that the disease has no effect at all.

    the DLQI was administered to participants who were ≥ 16 (16 to 75) years old at the time of the Screening visit.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Jun 2018
  2. Study start13 Aug 2018
  3. Primary completion6 Jan 2021
  4. Study completion10 Oct 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
912 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03569293
Sponsor's protocol ID
M16-045
Other IDs
2022-502938-30-00, 2017-005125-20, 2017
Acronym
Measure Up 1
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
14 Jun 2018
Last updated
17 Jun 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: AbbVie is committed to responsible clinical trial data sharing. This includes access to anonymized, individual and trial-level data (analysis data sets), as well as other information.
Expanded access
Available

Publications

  • Silverberg JI, Prajapati VH, Abraham S, Irvine AD, Gooderham MJ, Guttman-Yassky E, Tanizaki H, Rademaker M, Chen SH, Moreira A, Ta R, Lee WJ, Eyerich K. Achieving Minimal Disease Activity in Atopic Dermatitis Is Associated with Fewer Flares, Reduced Healthcare Resource Utilization, and Improved Disease Control: Analysis from the Real-World MEASURE-AD Study. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2026 Jul 30. doi: 10.1007/s13555-026-01865-0. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 42530735
  • Eyerich K, Mendes-Bastos P, Holzer G, Jain V, Katoh N, Luna PC, Segura PC, Lane M, Grada A, Moreira A, Bunick CG. Efficacy of Upadacitinib in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis of the Head and Neck Region. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2026 Jul;16(7):3461-3477. doi: 10.1007/s13555-026-01793-z. Epub 2026 May 24.

    PubMed 42177735
  • Irvine AD, Prajapati VH, Guttman-Yassky E, Simpson EL, Papp KA, Blauvelt A, Chu CY, Hong HC, Gold LFS, de Bruin-Weller M, Bieber T, Kabashima K, Rosmarin D, Sancho C, Calimlim BM, Grada A, Yang Y, Wu X, Levy G, Raymundo EM, Teixeira HD, Silverberg JI. Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial Results Through 140 Weeks. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2025 Nov;26(6):1003-1016. doi: 10.1007/s40257-025-00975-3. Epub 2025 Sep 3.

    PubMed 40900410
  • Burmester GR, Deodhar A, Irvine AD, Panaccione R, Winthrop KL, Vleugels RA, Levy G, Suravaram S, Palac H, Wegrzyn L, Ford S, Meerwein S, Guttman-Yassky E. Safety Profile of Upadacitinib: Descriptive Analysis in Over 27,000 Patient-Years Across Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, Axial Spondyloarthritis, Atopic Dermatitis, and Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Adv Ther. 2025 Oct;42(10):5215-5237. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03328-y. Epub 2025 Aug 28.

    PubMed 40875187
  • Simpson EL, Silverberg JI, Prajapati VH, Eyerich K, Katoh N, Boguniewicz M, Guttman-Yassky E, Song EJ, Lee WJ, Teixeira HD, Wu T, Sancho Sanchez C, Vigna N, Calimlim BM, de Bruin-Weller M. Rapid Itch Improvement and Skin Clearance with Upadacitinib Versus Placebo (Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2) and Versus Dupilumab (Heads Up): Results from Three Phase 3 Clinical Trials in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2025 Aug;15(8):2061-2076. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01443-w. Epub 2025 Jun 2.

    PubMed 40457140
  • Paller AS, Mendes-Bastos P, Siegfried E, Eichenfield LF, Soong W, Prajapati VH, Lio P, Simpson EL, Raymundo EM, Suravaram S, Hu X, Yang Y, Huang X, Calimlim BM, Platt AM, Su JC, Zheng M, Yamamoto-Hanada K, Teixeira HD, Irvine AD. Upadacitinib in Adolescents With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Analysis of 3 Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trials Through 76 Weeks. JAMA Dermatol. 2024 Dec 1;160(12):1304-1313. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.3696.

    PubMed 39441580
  • Blauvelt A, Eyerich K, Irvine AD, de Bruin-Weller M, Kwatra SG, Gooderham M, Kim B, Calimlim BM, Lee WJ, Raymundo EM, Liu Y, Ofori S, Platt AM, Silverberg JI. More Time Spent with Clear Skin and No Itch with Upadacitinib versus Dupilumab for Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 Sep;14(9):2621-2630. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01242-9. Epub 2024 Aug 7.

    PubMed 39110139
  • Simpson EL, Prajapati VH, Leshem YA, Chovatiya R, de Bruin-Weller MS, Stander S, Pink AE, Calimlim BM, Lee WJ, Teixeira H, Ladizinski B, Hu X, Yang Y, Liu Y, Liu M, Grada A, Platt AM, Silverberg JI. Upadacitinib Rapidly Improves Patient-Reported Outcomes in Atopic Dermatitis: 16-Week Results from Phase 3 Clinical Trials (Measure Up 1 and 2). Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 May;14(5):1127-1144. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01157-5. Epub 2024 May 2.

    PubMed 38696027
  • Silverberg JI, Gooderham MJ, Paller AS, Deleuran M, Bunick CG, Gold LFS, Hijnen D, Calimlim BM, Lee WJ, Teixeira HD, Hu X, Zhang S, Yang Y, Grada A, Platt AM, Thaci D. Early and Sustained Improvements in Symptoms and Quality of Life with Upadacitinib in Adults and Adolescents with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: 52-Week Results from Two Phase III Randomized Clinical Trials (Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2). Am J Clin Dermatol. 2024 May;25(3):485-496. doi: 10.1007/s40257-024-00853-4. Epub 2024 Mar 25.

    PubMed 38528257
  • Thyssen JP, Thaci D, Bieber T, Gooderham M, de Bruin-Weller M, Soong W, Kabashima K, Barbarot S, Luna PC, Xu J, Hu X, Liu Y, Raymundo EM, Calimlim BM, Nduaka C, Gamelli A, Simpson EL. Upadacitinib for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: Stratified analysis from three randomized phase 3 trials by key baseline characteristics. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2023 Sep;37(9):1871-1880. doi: 10.1111/jdv.19232. Epub 2023 Jun 21.

    PubMed 37247226
  • Paller AS, Ladizinski B, Mendes-Bastos P, Siegfried E, Soong W, Prajapati VH, Lio P, Thyssen JP, Simpson EL, Platt AM, Raymundo EM, Liu J, Calimlim BM, Huang X, Gu Y, Hu X, Yang Y, Su JC, Zheng M, Yamamoto-Hanada K, Teixeira HD, Irvine AD. Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib Treatment in Adolescents With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Analysis of the Measure Up 1, Measure Up 2, and AD Up Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Dermatol. 2023 May 1;159(5):526-535. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.0391.

    PubMed 37043227
  • Burmester GR, Cohen SB, Winthrop KL, Nash P, Irvine AD, Deodhar A, Mysler E, Tanaka Y, Liu J, Lacerda AP, Palac H, Shaw T, Mease PJ, Guttman-Yassky E. Safety profile of upadacitinib over 15 000 patient-years across rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and atopic dermatitis. RMD Open. 2023 Feb;9(1):e002735. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002735.

    PubMed 36754548
  • Mendes-Bastos P, Ladizinski B, Guttman-Yassky E, Jiang P, Liu J, Prajapati VH, Simpson EL, Vigna N, Teixeira HD, Barbarot S. Characterization of acne associated with upadacitinib treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: A post hoc integrated analysis of 3 phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022 Oct;87(4):784-791. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.06.012. Epub 2022 Jun 15.

    PubMed 35714786
  • Simpson EL, Papp KA, Blauvelt A, Chu CY, Hong HC, Katoh N, Calimlim BM, Thyssen JP, Chiou AS, Bissonnette R, Stein Gold LF, Wegzyn C, Hu X, Liu M, Liu J, Tenorio AR, Chu AD, Guttman-Yassky E. Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib in Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Analysis of Follow-up Data From the Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2 Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Dermatol. 2022 Apr 1;158(4):404-413. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.0029.

    PubMed 35262646
  • Guttman-Yassky E, Teixeira HD, Simpson EL, Papp KA, Pangan AL, Blauvelt A, Thaci D, Chu CY, Hong HC, Katoh N, Paller AS, Calimlim B, Gu Y, Hu X, Liu M, Yang Y, Liu J, Tenorio AR, Chu AD, Irvine AD. Once-daily upadacitinib versus placebo in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2): results from two replicate double-blind, randomised controlled phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2021 Jun 5;397(10290):2151-2168. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00588-2. Epub 2021 May 21.

    PubMed 34023008

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in