Cesarean Section ComplicationsNCT03570710
Reducing Blood Loss During Cesarean Hysterectomy for Placenta Accreta Spectrum
A study testing intravenous tranexamic acid, Topical tranexamic acid and Normal saline in people with Cesarean Section Complications, run by Aswan University Hospital at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
PAS is an obstetrics condition that is closely linked with massive obstetrical hemorrhage with a varied incidence about once in every 533 live births. It is considered one of the causes of massive transfusion (>4 units of packed red blood cells) and cesarean hysterectomy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 40 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Cesarean Section Complications
- What is being tested?
- intravenous tranexamic acid, Topical tranexamic acid and Normal saline
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2018to 1 Aug 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 40 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- all pregnant women with a single fetus scheduled for elective cesarean hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum
Who cannot join
- Patients with a cardiac, hepatic, renal or thromboembolic disease.
- patients with pelvic endometriosis and adnexal mass.
- patients had an allergy to tranexamic acid.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Reducing Blood Loss During Cesarean Hysterectomy for Placenta Accreta Spectrum With Intravenous Versus Topical Tranexamic Acid: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial
PAS is an obstetrics condition that is closely linked with massive obstetrical hemorrhage with a varied incidence about once in every 533 live births. It is considered one of the causes of massive transfusion (>4 units of packed red blood cells) and cesarean hysterectomy.
It is estimated that peripartum hysterectomies are performed in approximately0.08% of all deliveries. A large study from the United Kingdom noted that 38% were a result of PAS. More recently, population-based analyses show that PAS is the indication for the majority of peripartum hysterectomies.
Read more
Bleeding at the time of peripartum hysterectomy for PAS is often substantial. Nearly 90% of patients need blood products, while 38% of patients need a massive blood transfusion.
There is a 30% risk of an ICU admission, thromboembolic disease, readmission, reoperation, poor wound healing, and a reported rate of surgical re-exploration ranging from 4% to 33%. The risk of maternal death reported being as high as 7% (although less in most recent series) Therefore, adequate homeostatic techniques are essential. Currently, surgical hemostasis can be secured by a variety of methods, including mechanical sutures (or clamping), electric coagulation, ultrasonically activated scalpel or drugs.
TA is a lysine analog which acts as an antifibrinolytic via competitive inhibition of the binding of plasmin and plasminogen to fibrin. The rationale for its use in the reduction of blood loss depending on the implication of the coagulation and fibrinolysis processes . However, concerns about possible thromboembolic events with the parental administration of TA has stimulated increasing interest in its topical Use
Read the detailed description
Eligible participants were allocated to one of three groups. Group (I): patients received 110 ml normal saline IV just before skin incision Group (II): patients received 1 gm TA (2 ampoules of Capron 500 mg /5 ml; Amoun, Cairo, Egypt) intravenous just before skin incision. Group (III): patients received 2 gm topical TA (4 ampoules of Capron 500 mg/5 ml) applied on the placental bed after placental delivery. Patients were randomized to three groups, each compromised of 43 patients according to a three-blocked randomization list which was coded (1 or 2 or 3) at 1:1:1 ratio. The three parallel groups were prepared using a Computer-generated randomization system. The allocated groups will be concealed in serially numbered sealed opaque envelopes that will only be opened after recruitment. The patient allocation will be performed prior to the induction of anesthesia by an independent person, who will not otherwise be involved in this study. The trial will be appropriately blinded; the participants, outcome assessors and the surgeon performing the procedure will be blinded to the medication type, which will be used. In all eligible participants, CH was performed under general anesthesia by the same operative and anesthesia team. A dose of 1 g of first-generation cephalosporin (Cefazolin®; Bristol Mayers Squibb, Cairo, Egypt) was administered intravenously immediately prior to skin incision. The abdomen was exposed through Pfannensteil incision. After skin incision, the subcutaneous fat and abdominal fascia were opened crosswise, and the rectus muscle was opened on the midline, the parietal peritoneum was opened longitudinally, the visceral peritoneum was opened transversely and dissected downwards with the bladder and kept against symphysis pubis by a Doyen retractor, followed by transverse incision of the uterus at the upper border of the placenta to avoid transplacental incision which provoke severe bleeding.
Eligible participants were allocated to one of three groups after induction of general anesthesia and immediately prior to the operation and just before skin incision. they received 1-gram tranexamic acid (10 ml) in 100 ml saline infusion or placebo (110 normal saline) by slow intravenous injection at an approximate rate of 1 mL per min. Throughout the operation irrigation was done by 60 ml of (2g tranexamic acid (10 ml) diluted in 100 ml of sodium chloride 0.9%) or placebo ( 60 ml of sodium chloride 0.9%.).At the end of operation another dose of 60 ml of (1g tranexamic acid (10 ml) diluted in 50 ml of sodium chloride 0.9%) or placebo ( 60 ml of sodium chloride 0.9%.) was left intraabdominal then 1 intraperitoneal suction drain was routinely used in all patients the drains were closed for 3 hour postoperative , after that time the drains were opened and removed on the second postoperative day unless otherwise indicated.. To ensure a sufficiently high concentration of topical tranexamic acid, it was diluted only to a volume sufficient to moisten a large wound surface. 20 ml moistens at least 1500 cm2.
- Conditions
- Cesarean Section Complications
- Being tested
- intravenous tranexamic acid, Topical tranexamic acid, Normal saline
- Keywords
- cesarean section, placenta accreta spectrum, tranexamic acid
- Medical subject headings
- Placenta Accreta
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
intravenous tranexamic acidDrug
Also called Active Comparator
1 gm tranexamic acid (2 ampoules of Capron 500 mg /5 ml; Amoun, Cairo, Egypt) intravenous just before skin incision plus110 ml normal saline IV just before skin incision plus topical application of 200 ml normal saline applied on the pelvic bed after Cesarean hysterectomy
Topical tranexamic acidDrug
Also called Active Comparator
2 gm topical tranexamic acid ( 4 ampoules of Capron 500 mg/5 ml applied typically) in 200 ml normal saline applied on the pelvic bed after Cesarean hysterectomy plus110 ml normal saline IV just before skin incision plus topical application of 200 ml normal saline applied on the pelvic bed after Cesarean hysterectomy plus In topical tranexamic acid group gauze soaked with 2g tranexamic acid (20 ml) diluted in 200 ml of sodium chloride 0.9% or placebo (120ml of sodium chloride 0.9%.) applied on the pelvic bed after Cesarean hysterectomy. To ensure a sufficiently high concentration, the tranexamic acid was diluted only to a volume sufficient to moisten a large wound surface. 20 ml moisten at least 1500 cm2.
Normal salineDrug
Also called Placebo Comparator
110 ml normal saline IV just before skin incision plus topical application of 200 ml normal saline applied on the pelvic bed after Cesarean hysterectomy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| normal saline arm group | Placebo comparator | 110 ml normal saline IV just before skin incision plus topical application of 200 ml normal saline applied on the pelvic bed after Cesarean hysterectomy Receives: Drug: Normal saline |
| intravenous tranexamic acid group | Active comparator | 1 gm tranexamic acid (2 ampoules of Capron 500 mg /5 ml; Amoun, Cairo, Egypt) intravenous just before skin incision plus110 ml normal saline IV just before skin incision plus topical application of 200 ml normal saline applied on the pelvic bed after Cesarean hysterectomy Receives: Drug: intravenous tranexamic acid |
| Topical tranexamic acid group | Active comparator | 2 gm topical tranexamic acid ( 4 ampoules of Capron 500 mg/5 ml applied typically) in 200 ml normal saline applied on the pelvic bed after Cesarean hysterectomy plus110 ml normal saline IV just before skin incision plus topical application of 200 ml normal saline applied on the pelvic bed after Cesarean hysterectomy plus In topical tranexamic acid group gauze soaked with 2g tranexamic acid (20 ml) diluted in 200 ml of sodium chloride 0.9% or placebo (120ml of sodium chloride 0.9%.) applied on the pelvic bed after Cesarean hysterectomy. To ensure a sufficiently high concentration, the tranexamic acid was diluted only to a volume sufficient to moisten a large wound surface. 20 ml moisten at least 1500 cm2. Receives: Drug: Topical tranexamic acid |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
intraoperative blood loss
intraoperative blood loss
Measured: during the operation
Secondary outcomes (2)
postoperative blood loss
postoperative blood loss
Measured: 6 hours post operative
blood transfusion
intraoperative and 12 hour post operative
Measured: intraoperative and 12 hour post operative
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jun 2018
- Study start1 Jan 2018
- Primary completion30 Jun 2021
- Study completion1 Aug 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Cesarean Section ComplicationsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Eligible participants were allocated to one of three groups. Group (I): patients received 110 ml normal saline IV just before skin incision Group (II): patients received 1 gm TA (2 ampoules of Capron 500 mg /5 ml; Amoun, Cairo, Egypt) intravenous just before skin incision. Group (III): patients received 2 gm topical TA (4 ampoules of Capron 500 mg/5 ml) applied on the placental bed after placental delivery.
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Aswan University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, hany farouk, Aswan University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03570710
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- aswu/183/10/17
- Status last verified
- Aug 2021
- First submitted
- 14 May 2018
- Last updated
- 9 Aug 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Aug 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Reducing Blood Loss During Cesarean Hysterectomy for Placenta Accreta Spectrum With Intravenous Versus Topical Tranexamic Acid: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03570710
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- aswu/183/10/17
- Conditions
- Cesarean Section Complications
- Keywords
- cesarean section, placenta accreta spectrum, tranexamic acid
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Aswan University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Aug 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
PAS is an obstetrics condition that is closely linked with massive obstetrical hemorrhage with a varied incidence about once in every 533 live births. It is considered one of the causes of massive transfusion (>4 units of packed red blood cells) and cesarean hysterectomy.
It is estimated that peripartum hysterectomies are performed in approximately0.08% of all deliveries. A large study from the United Kingdom noted that 38% were a result of PAS. More recently, population-based analyses show that PAS is the indication for the majority of peripartum hysterectomies.
Bleeding at the time of peripartum hysterectomy for PAS is often substantial. Nearly 90% of patients need blood products, while 38% of patients need a massive blood transfusion.
There is a 30% risk of an ICU admission, thromboembolic disease, readmission, reoperation, poor wound healing, and a reported rate of surgical re-exploration ranging from 4% to 33%. The risk of maternal death reported being as high as 7% (although less in most recent series) Therefore, adequate homeostatic techniques are essential. Currently, surgical hemostasis can be secured by a variety of methods, including mechanical sutures (or clamping), electric coagulation, ultrasonically activated scalpel or drugs.
TA is a lysine analog which acts as an antifibrinolytic via competitive inhibition of the binding of plasmin and plasminogen to fibrin. The rationale for its use in the reduction of blood loss depending on the implication of the coagulation and fibrinolysis processes . However, concerns about possible thromboembolic events with the parental administration of TA has stimulated increasing interest in its topical Use
Detailed description
Eligible participants were allocated to one of three groups. Group (I): patients received 110 ml normal saline IV just before skin incision Group (II): patients received 1 gm TA (2 ampoules of Capron 500 mg /5 ml; Amoun, Cairo, Egypt) intravenous just before skin incision. Group (III): patients received 2 gm topical TA (4 ampoules of Capron 500 mg/5 ml) applied on the placental bed after placental delivery. Patients were randomized to three groups, each compromised of 43 patients according to a three-blocked randomization list which was coded (1 or 2 or 3) at 1:1:1 ratio. The three parallel groups were prepared using a Computer-generated randomization system. The allocated groups will be concealed in serially numbered sealed opaque envelopes that will only be opened after recruitment. The patient allocation will be performed prior to the induction of anesthesia by an independent person, who will not otherwise be involved in this study. The trial will be appropriately blinded; the participants, outcome assessors and the surgeon performing the procedure will be blinded to the medication type, which will be used. In all eligible participants, CH was performed under general anesthesia by the same operative and anesthesia team. A dose of 1 g of first-generation cephalosporin (Cefazolin®; Bristol Mayers Squibb, Cairo, Egypt) was administered intravenously immediately prior to skin incision. The abdomen was exposed through Pfannensteil incision. After skin incision, the subcutaneous fat and abdominal fascia were opened crosswise, and the rectus muscle was opened on the midline, the parietal peritoneum was opened longitudinally, the visceral peritoneum was opened transversely and dissected downwards with the bladder and kept against symphysis pubis by a Doyen retractor, followed by transverse incision of the uterus at the upper border of the placenta to avoid transplacental incision which provoke severe bleeding.
Eligible participants were allocated to one of three groups after induction of general anesthesia and immediately prior to the operation and just before skin incision. they received 1-gram tranexamic acid (10 ml) in 100 ml saline infusion or placebo (110 normal saline) by slow intravenous injection at an approximate rate of 1 mL per min. Throughout the operation irrigation was done by 60 ml of (2g tranexamic acid (10 ml) diluted in 100 ml of sodium chloride 0.9%) or placebo ( 60 ml of sodium chloride 0.9%.).At the end of operation another dose of 60 ml of (1g tranexamic acid (10 ml) diluted in 50 ml of sodium chloride 0.9%) or placebo ( 60 ml of sodium chloride 0.9%.) was left intraabdominal then 1 intraperitoneal suction drain was routinely used in all patients the drains were closed for 3 hour postoperative , after that time the drains were opened and removed on the second postoperative day unless otherwise indicated.. To ensure a sufficiently high concentration of topical tranexamic acid, it was diluted only to a volume sufficient to moisten a large wound surface. 20 ml moistens at least 1500 cm2.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- Eligible participants were allocated to one of three groups. Group (I): patients received 110 ml normal saline IV just before skin incision Group (II): patients received 1 gm TA (2 ampoules of Capron 500 mg /5 ml; Amoun, Cairo, Egypt) intravenous just before skin incision. Group (III): patients received 2 gm topical TA (4 ampoules of Capron 500 mg/5 ml) applied on the placental bed after placental delivery.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| normal saline arm group | Placebo comparator | Drug: Normal saline110 ml normal saline IV just before skin incision plus topical application of 200 ml normal saline applied on the pelvic bed after Cesarean hysterectomy |
| intravenous tranexamic acid group | Active comparator | Drug: intravenous tranexamic acid1 gm tranexamic acid (2 ampoules of Capron 500 mg /5 ml; Amoun, Cairo, Egypt) intravenous just before skin incision plus110 ml normal saline IV just before skin incision plus topical application of 200 ml normal saline applied on the pelvic bed after Cesarean hysterectomy |
| Topical tranexamic acid group | Active comparator | Drug: Topical tranexamic acid2 gm topical tranexamic acid ( 4 ampoules of Capron 500 mg/5 ml applied typically) in 200 ml normal saline applied on the pelvic bed after Cesarean hysterectomy plus110 ml normal saline IV just before skin incision plus topical application of 200 ml normal saline applied on the pelvic bed after Cesarean hysterectomy plus In topical tranexamic acid group gauze soaked with 2g tranexamic acid (20 ml) diluted in 200 ml of sodium chloride 0.9% or placebo (120ml of sodium chloride 0.9%.) applied on the pelvic bed after Cesarean hysterectomy. To ensure a sufficiently high concentration, the tranexamic acid was diluted only to a volume sufficient to moisten a large wound surface. 20 ml moisten at least 1500 cm2. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 40 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- all pregnant women with a single fetus scheduled for elective cesarean hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients with a cardiac, hepatic, renal or thromboembolic disease.
- patients with pelvic endometriosis and adnexal mass.
- patients had an allergy to tranexamic acid.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| intravenous tranexamic acidAlso: Active Comparator1 gm tranexamic acid (2 ampoules of Capron 500 mg /5 ml; Amoun, Cairo, Egypt) intravenous just before skin incision plus110 ml normal saline IV just before skin incision plus topical application of 200 ml normal saline applied on the pelvic bed after Cesarean hysterectomy | Drug | intravenous tranexamic acid group |
| Topical tranexamic acidAlso: Active Comparator2 gm topical tranexamic acid ( 4 ampoules of Capron 500 mg/5 ml applied typically) in 200 ml normal saline applied on the pelvic bed after Cesarean hysterectomy plus110 ml normal saline IV just before skin incision plus topical application of 200 ml normal saline applied on the pelvic bed after Cesarean hysterectomy plus In topical tranexamic acid group gauze soaked with 2g tranexamic acid (20 ml) diluted in 200 ml of sodium chloride 0.9% or placebo (120ml of sodium chloride 0.9%.) applied on the pelvic bed after Cesarean hysterectomy. To ensure a sufficiently high concentration, the tranexamic acid was diluted only to a volume sufficient to moisten a large wound surface. 20 ml moisten at least 1500 cm2. | Drug | Topical tranexamic acid group |
| Normal salineAlso: Placebo Comparator110 ml normal saline IV just before skin incision plus topical application of 200 ml normal saline applied on the pelvic bed after Cesarean hysterectomy | Drug | normal saline arm group |
Primary outcome
intraoperative blood loss
Time frame: during the operation
intraoperative blood loss
2 secondary outcomes
postoperative blood loss
Time frame: 6 hours post operative
blood transfusion
Time frame: intraoperative and 12 hour post operative
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Aug 2021.
Related trials for Cesarean Section Complications
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Effect of Two Different Doses of Intravenous Oxytocin on Patients Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section
Postpartum Hemorrhage, Uterine Atony
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Ultrasound Assessment Of Gastric Volume In Pregnant Women Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM), Obstetric Anesthesia
RecruitingPhase 1
Ketamine Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics for Postpartum Depression and Pain After Cesarean Delivery
Pain, Postpartum Depression
Recruiting
Clinical Impact of Uterine Repair During Cesarean Section With Barbed Suture on the Incidence of Isthmocele
Isthmocele, Cesarean Scar Defect
Not yet recruiting
The Mepilex Cesarean Delivery Trial / MEPIDEL
Surgical Site Infection
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing intravenous tranexamic acid, Topical tranexamic acid and Normal saline in people with Cesarean Section Complications, run by Aswan University Hospital at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Aug 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
intraoperative blood loss (time frame: during the operation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Aug 2021.