Chronic Low Back PainLBP-BIO-RELNCT03571880
Intra- And Inter-operator Reliability Of Isometric Back And Abdominal Muscle Strength Testing In Healthy Controls And Persons With Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain.
A study testing Biodex-assisted isometric strength testing in people with Chronic Low Back Pain, run by Hasselt University at 2 sites in Belgium.
Trial summary
Low back pain (LBP) is currently the most common cause of functional impairment with regard to the musculoskeletal system1. LBP occurs in men and women in all age groups and has a peak incidence between 30 and 65 years. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 25 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Low Back Pain
- What is being tested?
- Biodex-assisted isometric strength testing
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesBelgium
- Study dates
- 27 Feb 2017to 15 Jun 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 25 to 60 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- medically diagnosed with non-specific chronic low back pain,
- between 25-60 years old,
- able to understand Dutch (spoken and written).
Who cannot join
- invasive surgery at the lumbar spine in the last 18 months (arthrodesis was excluded, microsurgery was allowed),
- radiculopathy (uni- or bilateral),
- co-morbidities: paresis and/or sensory disturbances by neurological causes, diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, pregnancy,
- ongoing compensation claims and/or (work)disability > 6 months,
- rehabilitation/exercise therapy program for LBP in the past 6 months.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
About this study
Low back pain (LBP) is currently the most common cause of functional impairment with regard to the musculoskeletal system1. LBP occurs in men and women in all age groups and has a peak incidence between 30 and 65 years. Although 10% of the persons with LRP can be diagnosed with a specific underlying pathology (e.g., disc herniation, canal stenosis, spondylolysis, ...), 90% have symptoms with an unclear origin. 23% of the latter group will eventually develop chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNSLBP)2.
Exercise therapy is seen as an important component in the rehabilitation of persons with CNSPLBP3. Because previous research showed reduced muscle strength of the back muscles4, exercise therapy that improves / recovers muscle strength is being investigated. However, there is still a lack of clarity concerning the effect that reduced muscle strength has on the development and further development of back pain5-6. The objective testing of back muscle strength remains a recurring issue. Up to now, back muscle strength has been mainly tested by a battery of clinical tests (eg Sorensen test) or the use of "iso machines"7. These Iso machines contain a dynamometer that can very specifically reflect the isometric or isokinetic force on an axis of rotation. Different types of these iso machines (eg Cybex, Biodex) have already been developed, each with specific designs (eg differences in the hip angle, differences in the stabilization of the participant). However, to date no standardized protocols are available for evaluating both abdominal and back muscle strength. Furthermore, it is also essential that before such systems can be used in clinical intervention studies, the reliability of such systems is investigated and that reference data from healthy subjects are collected with which data from patients can be compared.
The aim of the current research is therefore to investigate the intra- and inter-operator reliability of a standardized protocol drawn up according to the latest scientific evidence. A second goal is to set standard values for healthy persons for the developed protocol using the Biodex 3 dynamometer system.
- Conditions
- Chronic Low Back Pain
- Being tested
- Biodex-assisted isometric strength testing
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Biodex-assisted isometric strength testingDevice
The maximum voluntary isometric and dynamic strength of back and abdominal muscles is measured using an isokinetic dynamometer (System 3, Biodex, Enraf-Nonius, New York).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CNSLBP group | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: Biodex-assisted isometric strength testing |
| Healthy control group | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Device: Biodex-assisted isometric strength testing |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
abdominal isometric strength
The maximum voluntary isometric strength of the abdominal muscles is measured using an isokinetic dynamometer (System 3, Biodex, Enraf-Nonius, New York).
Measured: day1
Abdominal isometric strength
The maximum voluntary isometric strength of the abdominal muscles is measured using an isokinetic dynamometer (System 3, Biodex, Enraf-Nonius, New York).
Measured: day 2
Abdominal dynamic strength
The maximum voluntary dynamic strength of abdominal muscles is measured using an isokinetic dynamometer (System 3, Biodex, Enraf-Nonius, New York).
Measured: day 1
Abdominal dynamic strength
The maximum voluntary dynamic strength of abdominal muscles is measured using an isokinetic dynamometer (System 3, Biodex, Enraf-Nonius, New York).
Measured: day 2
Back isometric strength
The maximum voluntary isometric strength of the back muscles is measured using an isokinetic dynamometer (System 3, Biodex, Enraf-Nonius, New York).
Measured: day 1
Back isometric strength
The maximum voluntary isometric strength of the back muscles is measured using an isokinetic dynamometer (System 3, Biodex, Enraf-Nonius, New York).
Measured: day 2
Back dynamic strength
The maximum voluntary dynamic strength of back muscles is measured using an isokinetic dynamometer (System 3, Biodex, Enraf-Nonius, New York).
Measured: day 1
Back dynamic strength
The maximum voluntary dynamic strength of back muscles is measured using an isokinetic dynamometer (System 3, Biodex, Enraf-Nonius, New York).
Measured: day 2
Secondary outcomes (3)
Pain
The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is a nominal scale on which the participant indicates the amount of pain he/she perceives at that current moment. It consists of a line indicating eleven successive scores (0-10), whereby score 0 means 'no pain' and score 10 means 'worst pain imaginable'. An improvement of 2 levels or more is accepted as clinically relevant.
Measured: day 1
The Modified Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
The Modified Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a valid and reliable questionnaire for evaluating constraints experienced by people in their daily activities due to chronic low back pain. It consists of 10 items that are scored on a 5-point scale. The total score gives a percentage degree of limitation for the patient.
Measured: Day 1
Physical Activities Scale For Individuals with Physical Disabilities (PASIPD)
The PASIPD is a questionnaire consisting of 13 items to measure the physical activity of people with disabilities. It provides information about leisure, household and work-related physical activity in the last 7 days.
Measured: day 1
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Jun 2018
- Study start27 Feb 2017
- Primary completion15 Jun 2018
- Study completion15 Jun 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic Low Back PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hasselt University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Jessa Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Annick Timmermans, Hasselt University
- Investigators
- Jonas Verbrugghe, drs, Study chair, Hasselt UniversityAnnick Timmermans, prof. dr., Principal investigator, Hasselt University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03571880
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LBP-BIO-REL-001
- Acronym
- LBP-BIO-REL
- Status last verified
- Jun 2018
- First submitted
- 18 Jun 2018
- Last updated
- 28 Jun 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Hoy D, March L, Brooks P, Blyth F, Woolf A, Bain C, Williams G, Smith E, Vos T, Barendregt J, Murray C, Burstein R, Buchbinder R. The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jun;73(6):968-74. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204428. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
PubMed 24665116Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C, Hildebrandt J, Klaber-Moffett J, Kovacs F, Mannion AF, Reis S, Staal JB, Ursin H, Zanoli G; COST B13 Working Group on Guidelines for Chronic Low Back Pain. Chapter 4. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2006 Mar;15 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S192-300. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-1072-1. No abstract available.
PubMed 16550448van Middelkoop M, Rubinstein SM, Kuijpers T, Verhagen AP, Ostelo R, Koes BW, van Tulder MW. A systematic review on the effectiveness of physical and rehabilitation interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2011 Jan;20(1):19-39. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1518-3. Epub 2010 Jul 18.
PubMed 20640863
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Jun 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Intra- And Inter-operator Reliability Of Isometric Back And Abdominal Muscle Strength Testing In Healthy Controls And Persons With Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03571880
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LBP-BIO-REL / LBP-BIO-REL-001
- Conditions
- Chronic Low Back Pain
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hasselt UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Jessa Hospital
- Study start
- 27 Feb 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Jun 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Low back pain (LBP) is currently the most common cause of functional impairment with regard to the musculoskeletal system1. LBP occurs in men and women in all age groups and has a peak incidence between 30 and 65 years. Although 10% of the persons with LRP can be diagnosed with a specific underlying pathology (e.g., disc herniation, canal stenosis, spondylolysis, ...), 90% have symptoms with an unclear origin. 23% of the latter group will eventually develop chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNSLBP)2.
Exercise therapy is seen as an important component in the rehabilitation of persons with CNSPLBP3. Because previous research showed reduced muscle strength of the back muscles4, exercise therapy that improves / recovers muscle strength is being investigated. However, there is still a lack of clarity concerning the effect that reduced muscle strength has on the development and further development of back pain5-6. The objective testing of back muscle strength remains a recurring issue. Up to now, back muscle strength has been mainly tested by a battery of clinical tests (eg Sorensen test) or the use of "iso machines"7. These Iso machines contain a dynamometer that can very specifically reflect the isometric or isokinetic force on an axis of rotation. Different types of these iso machines (eg Cybex, Biodex) have already been developed, each with specific designs (eg differences in the hip angle, differences in the stabilization of the participant). However, to date no standardized protocols are available for evaluating both abdominal and back muscle strength. Furthermore, it is also essential that before such systems can be used in clinical intervention studies, the reliability of such systems is investigated and that reference data from healthy subjects are collected with which data from patients can be compared.
The aim of the current research is therefore to investigate the intra- and inter-operator reliability of a standardized protocol drawn up according to the latest scientific evidence. A second goal is to set standard values for healthy persons for the developed protocol using the Biodex 3 dynamometer system.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CNSLBP group | Experimental | Device: Biodex-assisted isometric strength testing |
| Healthy control group | Active comparator | Device: Biodex-assisted isometric strength testing |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 25 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- medically diagnosed with non-specific chronic low back pain,
- between 25-60 years old,
- able to understand Dutch (spoken and written).
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- invasive surgery at the lumbar spine in the last 18 months (arthrodesis was excluded, microsurgery was allowed),
- radiculopathy (uni- or bilateral),
- co-morbidities: paresis and/or sensory disturbances by neurological causes, diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, pregnancy,
- ongoing compensation claims and/or (work)disability > 6 months,
- rehabilitation/exercise therapy program for LBP in the past 6 months.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Biodex-assisted isometric strength testingThe maximum voluntary isometric and dynamic strength of back and abdominal muscles is measured using an isokinetic dynamometer (System 3, Biodex, Enraf-Nonius, New York). | Device | CNSLBP group, Healthy control group |
Primary outcome
abdominal isometric strength
Time frame: day1
The maximum voluntary isometric strength of the abdominal muscles is measured using an isokinetic dynamometer (System 3, Biodex, Enraf-Nonius, New York).
Abdominal isometric strength
Time frame: day 2
The maximum voluntary isometric strength of the abdominal muscles is measured using an isokinetic dynamometer (System 3, Biodex, Enraf-Nonius, New York).
Abdominal dynamic strength
Time frame: day 1
The maximum voluntary dynamic strength of abdominal muscles is measured using an isokinetic dynamometer (System 3, Biodex, Enraf-Nonius, New York).
Abdominal dynamic strength
Time frame: day 2
The maximum voluntary dynamic strength of abdominal muscles is measured using an isokinetic dynamometer (System 3, Biodex, Enraf-Nonius, New York).
Back isometric strength
Time frame: day 1
The maximum voluntary isometric strength of the back muscles is measured using an isokinetic dynamometer (System 3, Biodex, Enraf-Nonius, New York).
Back isometric strength
Time frame: day 2
The maximum voluntary isometric strength of the back muscles is measured using an isokinetic dynamometer (System 3, Biodex, Enraf-Nonius, New York).
Back dynamic strength
Time frame: day 1
The maximum voluntary dynamic strength of back muscles is measured using an isokinetic dynamometer (System 3, Biodex, Enraf-Nonius, New York).
Back dynamic strength
Time frame: day 2
The maximum voluntary dynamic strength of back muscles is measured using an isokinetic dynamometer (System 3, Biodex, Enraf-Nonius, New York).
3 secondary outcomes
Pain
Time frame: day 1
The Modified Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time frame: Day 1
Physical Activities Scale For Individuals with Physical Disabilities (PASIPD)
Time frame: day 1
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Jun 2018.
- Results publication: PubMed 24665116Hoy D, March L, Brooks P, Blyth F, Woolf A, Bain C, Williams G, Smith E, Vos T, Barendregt J, Murray C, Burstein R, Buchbinder R. The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jun;73(6):968-74. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204428. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
- Results publication: PubMed 16550448Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C, Hildebrandt J, Klaber-Moffett J, Kovacs F, Mannion AF, Reis S, Staal JB, Ursin H, Zanoli G; COST B13 Working Group on Guidelines for Chronic Low Back Pain. Chapter 4. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2006 Mar;15 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S192-300. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-1072-1. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 20640863van Middelkoop M, Rubinstein SM, Kuijpers T, Verhagen AP, Ostelo R, Koes BW, van Tulder MW. A systematic review on the effectiveness of physical and rehabilitation interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2011 Jan;20(1):19-39. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1518-3. Epub 2010 Jul 18.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Chronic Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises With and Without YTWL (Scapular Stabilization Exercises) on Reducing Chronic Low Back Pain and Related Disability. A Randomized Clinical Trial,
Chronic Non Specific Mechanical Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Not yet recruiting
Spinery Basivertebral Nerve Ablation for Vertebrogenic Chronic Low Back Pain
Low Back Pain, Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)
Enrolling by invitation
Effects of 3-dimensional Versus Dynamic Myofascial Release Techniques With Lumbar Mobilization and Exercise Therapy Program in Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain, Myofascial Release
RecruitingPhase 2
A Master Protocol Study (LY900028) of Multiple Intervention-Specific-Appendices (ISAs) in Participants With Chronic Pain
Osteoarthritis, Knee, Diabetic Neuropathic Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jonas Verbrugghe, drs study chair
Hasselt University
Annick Timmermans, prof. dr. principal investigator
Hasselt University
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Biodex-assisted isometric strength testing in people with Chronic Low Back Pain, run by Hasselt University at 2 sites in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jun 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
abdominal isometric strength (time frame: day1). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03571880, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jun 2018.