ToothbrushingBEECONNCT03576326
BEhavioral EConomics for Oral Health iNnovation Trial
A study testing Drawing Incentive in people with Toothbrushing and Dental Plaque, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This Phase II stratified randomized prevention trial will assess the efficacy of a behavioral economic theory-based financial incentive drawing program versus a control regimen to promote early childhood caries (ECC) preventive health behaviors (toothbrushing performance) for young children of predominantly Latino… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 to 47 monthsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Toothbrushing, Dental Plaque, Parent-Child Relations
- What is being tested?
- Drawing Incentive
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 244 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 9 May 2018to 30 Jun 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 to 47 months
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Child
- at least 2 fully erupted teeth
- enrolled in, or waitlisted for, one of the participating Los Angeles County Early Head Start (EHS) or affiliated day care center or area clinic programs
- Parent/caregiver
- provide signed and dated informed consent form in English or Spanish
- agree to comply with all study procedures and be available for the duration of the study
Show all 15Show fewer
- aged 18 or older
- speak either English or Spanish and self-reported ability to read and write either English or Spanish
- be a parent or caregiver of a child at least 6 months old but less than 4 years (48 months), with at least 2 fully erupted teeth and enrolled in, or waitlisted for, one of the participating Los Angeles County EHS or affiliated day care center or area clinic programs
- not be planning to move residence for the next 18 months outside the greater Los Angeles area
- own a smartphone with Google Play or iTunes store app and be willing to download and install the smart powered toothbrush app at the Screening visit and keep it installed for the duration of the project. [If the app cannot be properly installed by the baseline visit, the participant will not be randomized.]
- be willing to be contacted via text-messaging (SMS) for study related notifications, such as incentives earned or reminders to sync the toothbrush
- Stakeholder
- be a staff member at a participating study site (e.g. EHS or affiliated day care center)
- verbally agree to participate after being provided a study information sheet
Who cannot join
- Child
- known allergic reaction to components of the study product(s)
- uncooperative or behaviorally unsuited (assessed during a toothbrush prophylaxis, ASTDD Basic Screening Survey caries screening, and photograph of maxillary incisors at the screening visit)
- more than 2 crowns on maxillary incisor teeth (teeth# D, E, F, G, or equivalently #52, 51, 61, 62).
- participated in the BEECON pilot trial
- a sibling of a child enrolled in the study (the family's oldest child in the eligible age range will be the study child)
Show all 11Show fewer
- enrolled in foster care
- anything else that would place him/her at increased health risk or preclude the individual's full compliance with or completion of the study
- Parent/caregiver
- participated in the BEECON pilot trial
- unable or unwilling to install and use the smart powered toothbrush app during the run-in period
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Venice Family Clinic Children First Early Head Start
Santa Monica, California, 90405-1828
About this study
Official title: Influence of Financial Incentives on Oral Disease Management in Young Children
This Phase II stratified randomized prevention trial will assess the efficacy of a behavioral economic theory-based financial incentive drawing program versus a control regimen to promote early childhood caries (ECC) preventive health behaviors (toothbrushing performance) for young children of predominantly Latino parents/caregivers in Early Head Start (EHS) and day care center programs.
- Being tested
- Drawing Incentive
- Keywords
- Preventive Dentistry, Health Disparities, Health Behavior, Behavioral Economics
- Medical subject headings
- Dental Plaque, Dental Caries, Health Behavior
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Drawing IncentiveBehavioural
The Monetary Reward intervention is a drawing reward, in which participants are eligible for weekly rewards based on toothbrushing performance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Incentive Drawing | Experimental | Eligible to earn a weekly drawing entry with different winning probabilities during the 6-month incentive intervention period. Possible winnings depend on toothbrushing performance: low adherence threshold (brushing child's teeth once per day for 7 days in a week) will have an 18% chance of winning $25 and a 1% chance of winning $50 (expected $5 payout); high adherence threshold (brushing twice per day for 14 days in a week) will have a 34% chance of winning $25 and a 3% chance of winning $50 (expected $10 payout). Receives: Behavioral: Drawing Incentive |
| Control - Delayed Incentive | No intervention | No rewards during the first 12 months, but information on toothbrushing performance. After the Month 12 follow-up visit, may opt to participate in a delayed 6-month open label extension to earn the same monetary rewards the intervention group could earn Baseline through Month 6. Not a formal part of this trial, but rather a necessary condition to assure all participating parents/caregivers have the chance to earn the same monetary incentives. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Toothbrushing Performance
Mean of the number of qualifying half-day episodes per week in which a parent/caregiver brushes a child's teeth. (A Bluetooth-recorded toothbrushing episode qualifies if it lasts at least one minute within one of 14 half-day windows in the week.)
Measured: Baseline visit through the Month 6 visit
Secondary outcomes (10)
Short-term (Immediate) Toothbrushing Performance
Mean number of qualifying half-day episodes per week in which a parent/caregiver brushes a child's teeth.
Measured: Baseline visit through the Month 1 visit
Mid-term Toothbrushing Performance
Mean number of qualifying half-day episodes per week in which a parent/caregiver brushes a child's teeth.
Measured: Baseline visit through the Month 3 visit
Toothbrushing Performance Sustainability
Mean number of qualifying half-day episodes per week in which a parent/caregiver brushes a child's teeth.
Measured: Month 6 visit through the Month 12 visit
Self-efficacy Scale
Caregiver (parent) oral health self-efficacy items (total score ranges 6-30 with higher score indicating more self-efficacy; 6 items each on 1-5 ordinal scale, Albino et al.; Finlayson et al.)
Measured: Month 6 visit
Modified Simplified Oral Hygiene Index
Debris Index of the Simplified Oral Hygiene Index for Maxillary Incisors (OHI-MIS) to measure child's plaque on primary maxillary incisor facial (labial) tooth surfaces (mean of 4 ordinal scores each with values ranging from no plaque (1) - which is best - to abundant plaque (4) - which is worst)
Measured: Month 6 visit and Month 12 visit
Change From Baseline in Toothpaste Weight
Change in child's toothpaste pump weight (grams) from each distribution visit (6 months prior). Negative mean values are a decrease from an earlier time to a subsequent time.
Measured: From Baseline to Month 6 visit and From Month 6 visit to Month 12 visit
Untreated Caries
Number and percent of children with untreated caries using Association of State and Territorial Dental Directors Basic Screening Survey (ASTDD BSS) binary (yes/no) measure of child's untreated caries status (dt>0)
Measured: Month 6 visit and Month 12 visit
Caries Experience
Number and percent of children with any history of caries using Association of State and Territorial Dental Directors Basic Screening Survey (ASTDD BSS) binary (yes/no) measure of child's caries experience status (dmft>0)
Measured: Month 6 visit and Month 12 visit
Severe Caries
Number and percent of children with severe caries experience using Association of State and Territorial Dental Directors Basic Screening Survey (ASTDD BSS) binary (yes/no) measure of child's severe caries experience status (dmft>=4)
Measured: Month 6 visit and Month 12 visit
Past Year Dental Visit
Number and percent of children with a dental visit in the past 12 months, obtained through Early Head Start ChildPlus database which records child's binary annual dental visit (yes/no) and other required health screenings
Measured: Month 12 visit
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Jul 2018
- Study start9 May 2018
- Primary completion13 May 2021
- Study completion30 Jun 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ToothbrushingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of California, San FranciscoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Eligible consenting parent-child participant dyads, within strata and permuted blocks, will be randomized in equal allocation to one of two arms. Strata will be based on site and smartphone operating system (iOS or Android).
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 244 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San Francisco
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of California, Los Angeles, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Stuart Gansky, DrPH, Principal investigator, University of California, San FranciscoFrancisco Ramos-Gomez, DDS, MS, MPH, Principal investigator, University of California, Los Angeles
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03576326
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NIDCR 17-084-E UH3DE025514
- Other IDs
- UH3DE025514
- Acronym
- BEECON
- Status last verified
- Sep 2025
- First submitted
- 23 May 2018
- Last updated
- 19 Sep 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: De-identified data will be made available.
Publications
Ramos-Gomez F, White JS, Lindau HE, Lin TK, Finlayson TL, Liu JX, Gansky SA. Family monetary incentives as a value-based care model for oral hygiene: rationale and design of the BEhavioral EConomics for Oral health iNnovation (BEECON) trial. J Public Health Dent. 2020 Oct 8:10.1111/jphd.12406. doi: 10.1111/jphd.12406. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 33090505
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Sep 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Influence of Financial Incentives on Oral Disease Management in Young Children
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03576326
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BEECON / NIDCR 17-084-E UH3DE025514
- Keywords
- Preventive Dentistry, Health Disparities, Health Behavior, Behavioral Economics
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 244 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San FranciscoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of California, Los Angeles, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)
- Study start
- 9 May 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 13 May 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 18 Sep 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This Phase II stratified randomized prevention trial will assess the efficacy of a behavioral economic theory-based financial incentive drawing program versus a control regimen to promote early childhood caries (ECC) preventive health behaviors (toothbrushing performance) for young children of predominantly Latino parents/caregivers in Early Head Start (EHS) and day care center programs.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Eligible consenting parent-child participant dyads, within strata and permuted blocks, will be randomized in equal allocation to one of two arms. Strata will be based on site and smartphone operating system (iOS or Android).
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Incentive Drawing | Experimental | Behavioral: Drawing IncentiveEligible to earn a weekly drawing entry with different winning probabilities during the 6-month incentive intervention period. Possible winnings depend on toothbrushing performance: low adherence threshold (brushing child's teeth once per day for 7 days in a week) will have an 18% chance of winning $25 and a 1% chance of winning $50 (expected $5 payout); high adherence threshold (brushing twice per day for 14 days in a week) will have a 34% chance of winning $25 and a 3% chance of winning $50 (expected $10 payout). |
| Control - Delayed Incentive | No intervention | –No rewards during the first 12 months, but information on toothbrushing performance. After the Month 12 follow-up visit, may opt to participate in a delayed 6-month open label extension to earn the same monetary rewards the intervention group could earn Baseline through Month 6. Not a formal part of this trial, but rather a necessary condition to assure all participating parents/caregivers have the chance to earn the same monetary incentives. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 to 47 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Child
- Parent/caregiver
- Stakeholder
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Child
- Parent/caregiver
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Drawing IncentiveThe Monetary Reward intervention is a drawing reward, in which participants are eligible for weekly rewards based on toothbrushing performance. | Behavioural | Incentive Drawing |
Primary outcome
Toothbrushing Performance
Time frame: Baseline visit through the Month 6 visit
Mean of the number of qualifying half-day episodes per week in which a parent/caregiver brushes a child's teeth. (A Bluetooth-recorded toothbrushing episode qualifies if it lasts at least one minute within one of 14 half-day windows in the week.)
10 secondary outcomes
Short-term (Immediate) Toothbrushing Performance
Time frame: Baseline visit through the Month 1 visit
Mid-term Toothbrushing Performance
Time frame: Baseline visit through the Month 3 visit
Toothbrushing Performance Sustainability
Time frame: Month 6 visit through the Month 12 visit
Self-efficacy Scale
Time frame: Month 6 visit
Modified Simplified Oral Hygiene Index
Time frame: Month 6 visit and Month 12 visit
Change From Baseline in Toothpaste Weight
Time frame: From Baseline to Month 6 visit and From Month 6 visit to Month 12 visit
Untreated Caries
Time frame: Month 6 visit and Month 12 visit
Caries Experience
Time frame: Month 6 visit and Month 12 visit
Severe Caries
Time frame: Month 6 visit and Month 12 visit
Past Year Dental Visit
Time frame: Month 12 visit
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Sep 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33090505Ramos-Gomez F, White JS, Lindau HE, Lin TK, Finlayson TL, Liu JX, Gansky SA. Family monetary incentives as a value-based care model for oral hygiene: rationale and design of the BEhavioral EConomics for Oral health iNnovation (BEECON) trial. J Public Health Dent. 2020 Oct 8:10.1111/jphd.12406. doi: 10.1111/jphd.12406. Online ahead of print.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. De-identified data will be made available.
Related trials for Toothbrushing
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Assess the Efficacy of Two Brushing Regimens in the Reduction of Established Dental Plaque and Gingivitis
Plaque, Gingivitis
Enrolling by invitation
Mobile App-Based Intervention to Improve Toothbrushing in Children and Teens With Autism
Autism Spectrum Disorder
Enrolling by invitation
Effects of Three Oral Hygiene Protocols on Oral Bacteria in Intensive Care Patients
Oral Bacterial Colonization, Oral Hygiene
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Oral Hygiene Assistance Training Program
Elderly, Periodontal Disease
Recruiting
Safety and Efficacy of Flaus Electric Flosser on Plaque and Gingivitis Compared to a Manual Toothbrush
Gingivitis, Gingival Bleeding
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Stuart Gansky, DrPH principal investigator
University of California, San Francisco
Francisco Ramos-Gomez, DDS, MS, MPH principal investigator
University of California, Los Angeles
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Drawing Incentive in people with Toothbrushing and Dental Plaque, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Sep 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Toothbrushing Performance (time frame: Baseline visit through the Month 6 visit). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03576326, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Sep 2025.