TelemedicineAPP-2NCT03578731
Efficacy of the "Consilium" Smartphone App for Detecting Symptoms and Treatment Side Effects in Cancer Patients
An observational study of Telemedicine and eHealth, run by OnkoZentrum Zürich AG at 18 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
The study investigates the influence of the use of a Smartphone App, on changes in general well-being and the occurrence of symptoms during a tumor therapy. With this documentation, medical professionals should be enabled to judge the influence of symptoms on quality of life during different time periods, between… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Telemedicine, eHealth
- What is being tested?
- app
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 224 participants
- Where
- 18 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- 5 Mar 2018to 10 Oct 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with the most common types of cancer in the treatment center will be included: Breast, Colon, Prostate, Lung, Hematological malignancies
Who may be able to join
- Signed Informed Consent Form
- Women or men aged ≥ 18 years
- Patients with breast, colon, prostate, lung cancer or hemat. malignancies
- Initiation or change of therapy for the types of cancer mentioned above
- German speaking
- Personal smartphone with iOS or Android system
Who cannot join
- Patients whose compliance must be questioned, e.g. due to a psychological disorders or private life situation
- Patients with insufficient knowledge of smartphone use.
Trial locations and contacts
18 sites in 3 countries.
18 sites in 3 countries
Switzerland14 sites
Kantonsspital Aarau
Aarau, 5000
Tumor Zentrum Aarau - Hirslanden Medical Center
Aarau, 5000
Onkologie Praxis Lindenhofspital
Bern, 3001
PROLINDO - Lindenhofspital
Bern, 3001
Oncocare Klinik Engeried
Bern, 3012
TUCARE
Bülach, 8180
Onko-Hämatologisches Zentrum Zug
Cham, 6330
Kantonsspital Baselland
Liestal, 4410
Limmattal Spital
Schlieren, 8952
OnkoZentrum Zürich AG
Zurich, Canton of Zurich, 8038
Onkologiepraxis Bellvue
Zurich, 8001
Brust-Zentrum Zürich
Zurich, 8008
OnkoZentrum Hirslanden
Zurich, 8032
Universitätsspital Zürich, Klinik für Gynäkologie
Zurich, 8091
Germany3 sites
Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale) Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie
Halle, 06120
Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe (Gynäkologie)
Lübeck, 23538
Sana Klinikum Offenbach Abteilung Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe
Offenbach, 63069
About this study
Official title: Efficacy of the "Consilium" Smartphone App for Detecting Symptoms and Treatment Side Effects in Cancer Patients Depending on Form of Medication Application, Age and Outpatient Characteristics: Observational Study
The study investigates the influence of the use of a Smartphone App, on changes in general well-being and the occurrence of symptoms during a tumor therapy. With this documentation, medical professionals should be enabled to judge the influence of symptoms on quality of life during different time periods, between planed visits on site.
Read the detailed description
The study will examine the number, characteristics and intensity of electronically reported symptoms and therapy side effects depending on treatment and characteristics of patients with cancer of breast, colon, prostate, lung and hematological malignancies during a three-month period from the initiation of therapy. This period frequently represents the duration of a therapeutic regimen.
The level of agreement κ between the ECOG/CTCAE ratings by physicians at the time of the regular consultation, and the ratings derived from the daily PROs between consultations, will be analyzed in order to determine the reliability and utility of self-reported electronic symptom monitoring.
The purpose is to evaluate different qualities of symptoms self-reported electronically between consultations with respect to the course of treatment application, out-patient settings, gender and age. In particular, outpatients with frequent (weekly) consultations will be compared to patients with infrequent consultations (3-weekly or less frequent).
The study will also aim to identify the conditions and factors that might increase the likelihood of an unplanned consultation or emergency hospitalization.
In particular, the proposed study design and associated primary and secondary endpoints will enable us to test the following hypotheses:
- In patient groups with infrequent outpatient visits (3-weekly or less) as is determined by the treatment schedule, the level of agreement κ between ePRO-derived ECOG/CTCAE ratings and physician-derived ECOG/CTCAE ratings (at time of consultation) is at least as high as in patient groups with weekly visits for symptoms having occurred within the week before the visit. However, κ is expected lower in the group with infrequent visits for symptoms having occurred more than 2 weeks prior to consultation, due to higher fidelity of ePRO-derived ratings for long-ago symptoms.
- Regular visits of outpatients undergoing infusion therapy (as determined by the treatment schedule) do not significantly decrease the number of unplanned and emergency consultations necessary.
- Young female and older male patient groups report significantly more severe and worsening symptoms and side effects.
Patients with the most common types of cancer in the treatment center will be included:
Breast, Colon, Prostate, Lung, Hematological malignancies
- Conditions
- Telemedicine, eHealth
- Being tested
- app
- Keywords
- APP, ePRO, electronic patient reported outcome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
appDevice
The app is used to record the study parameters for a period of 90 days.
The following measures are used for data collection:
- Interview during regular consultation with doctor
- Web-App for gathering doctors data
- "Consilium" Smartphone App for gathering patient data During the course of care, the patient enters in a regular manner symptoms and treatment side effects in the Smartphone app. A continuous capture of the symptoms and treatment side effect is provided. If no entry is made within 3 days the patient is prompted to enter the data via a push message.
- Well-being through a patient rating on a visual analog scale
- Registration of symptoms and treatment side effects is done through the app
After completion of the study patients will be questioned according to:
- Usability and usefulness of the Smartphone app
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Consilium-APP | Patients with oncological, medical treatment for breast cancer, colon cancer, prostate cancer, lung cancer or hematological malignancies. Receives: Device: app |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Level of agreement
Level of agreement κ with respect to categories of common toxicity criteria (ECOG/CTCAE) categories between ePRO recording and the treating physician at time of consultation
Measured: 12 weeks of treatment
Secondary outcomes (6)
ePRO and therapy side effects
Assessment of the number, characteristics and intensity of electronically reported symptoms and therapy side effects during the first three months of therapy
Measured: 12 weeks of treatment
Rating of different qualities of electronically reported symptoms in out-patient settings
Rating of different qualities of electronically reported symptoms in out-patient settings with respect to: course of treatment application (oral vs. infusion vs. radiation), treatment (systemic vs. local), gender and age
Measured: 12 weeks of treatment
Unplanned consultations
Number and nature of unplanned consultations, (consultation vs. emergency hospitalizations)
Measured: 12 weeks of treatment
Hospital days
Number of days in the hospital during for each event (≤2 days or > 2 days)
Measured: 12 weeks of treatment
Patient characteristics for discontinued use of mobile monitoring
Assessment of patients' characteristics for a discontinuation of the use of the mobile monitoring
Measured: 12 weeks of treatment
Usability and usefulness of smartphone app
Evaluation of the usability and usefulness of the smartphone app in the course of the treatment as rated by physician and patient after completion of the study
Measured: 12 weeks of treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Jul 2018
- Study start5 Mar 2018
- Primary completion10 Oct 2020
- Study completion10 Oct 2020
Why it stopped: Mainly due to insufficient recruitment
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for TelemedicineStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 224 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- OnkoZentrum Zürich AG
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Stiftung Swiss Tumor Institute
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Andreas Trojan, Prof. Dr. med., Principal investigator, OnkoZentrum Zürich AG
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03578731
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2017-02028
- Other IDs
- 2017
- Acronym
- APP-2
- Status last verified
- Nov 2020
- First submitted
- 8 May 2018
- Last updated
- 1 Feb 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Publications
Trojan A, Kuhne C, Kiessling M, Schumacher J, Drose S, Singer C, Jackisch C, Thomssen C, Kullak-Ublick GA. Impact of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes on Unplanned Consultations and Hospitalizations in Patients With Cancer Undergoing Systemic Therapy: Results of a Patient-Reported Outcome Study Compared With Matched Retrospective Data. JMIR Form Res. 2024 May 6;8:e55917. doi: 10.2196/55917.
PubMed 38710048Trojan A, Roth S, Atassi Z, Kiessling M, Zenhaeusern R, Kadvany Y, Schumacher J, Kullak-Ublick GA, Aapro M, Eniu A. Comparison of the Real-World Reporting of Symptoms and Well-Being for the HER2-Directed Trastuzumab Biosimilar Ogivri With Registry Data for Herceptin in the Treatment of Breast Cancer: Prospective Observational Study (OGIPRO) of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes. JMIR Cancer. 2024 Apr 4;10:e54178. doi: 10.2196/54178.
PubMed 38573759Trojan A, Leuthold N, Thomssen C, Rody A, Winder T, Jakob A, Egger C, Held U, Jackisch C. The Effect of Collaborative Reviews of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes on the Congruence of Patient- and Clinician-Reported Toxicity in Cancer Patients Receiving Systemic Therapy: Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Clinical Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 5;23(8):e29271. doi: 10.2196/29271.
PubMed 34383675Trojan A, Battig B, Mannhart M, Seifert B, Brauchbar MN, Egbring M. Effect of Collaborative Review of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes for Shared Reporting in Breast Cancer Patients: Descriptive Comparative Study. JMIR Cancer. 2021 Mar 17;7(1):e26950. doi: 10.2196/26950.
PubMed 33729162
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Feb 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy of the "Consilium" Smartphone App for Detecting Symptoms and Treatment Side Effects in Cancer Patients Depending on Form of Medication Application, Age and Outpatient Characteristics: Observational Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03578731
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- APP-2 / 2017-02028
- Conditions
- Telemedicine, eHealth
- Keywords
- APP, ePRO, electronic patient reported outcome
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Mainly due to insufficient recruitment
- Enrolment
- 224 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- OnkoZentrum Zürich AGUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Stiftung Swiss Tumor Institute
- Study start
- 5 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Oct 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study investigates the influence of the use of a Smartphone App, on changes in general well-being and the occurrence of symptoms during a tumor therapy. With this documentation, medical professionals should be enabled to judge the influence of symptoms on quality of life during different time periods, between planed visits on site.
Detailed description
The study will examine the number, characteristics and intensity of electronically reported symptoms and therapy side effects depending on treatment and characteristics of patients with cancer of breast, colon, prostate, lung and hematological malignancies during a three-month period from the initiation of therapy. This period frequently represents the duration of a therapeutic regimen.
The level of agreement κ between the ECOG/CTCAE ratings by physicians at the time of the regular consultation, and the ratings derived from the daily PROs between consultations, will be analyzed in order to determine the reliability and utility of self-reported electronic symptom monitoring.
The purpose is to evaluate different qualities of symptoms self-reported electronically between consultations with respect to the course of treatment application, out-patient settings, gender and age. In particular, outpatients with frequent (weekly) consultations will be compared to patients with infrequent consultations (3-weekly or less frequent).
The study will also aim to identify the conditions and factors that might increase the likelihood of an unplanned consultation or emergency hospitalization.
In particular, the proposed study design and associated primary and secondary endpoints will enable us to test the following hypotheses:
- In patient groups with infrequent outpatient visits (3-weekly or less) as is determined by the treatment schedule, the level of agreement κ between ePRO-derived ECOG/CTCAE ratings and physician-derived ECOG/CTCAE ratings (at time of consultation) is at least as high as in patient groups with weekly visits for symptoms having occurred within the week before the visit. However, κ is expected lower in the group with infrequent visits for symptoms having occurred more than 2 weeks prior to consultation, due to higher fidelity of ePRO-derived ratings for long-ago symptoms.
- Regular visits of outpatients undergoing infusion therapy (as determined by the treatment schedule) do not significantly decrease the number of unplanned and emergency consultations necessary.
- Young female and older male patient groups report significantly more severe and worsening symptoms and side effects.
Patients with the most common types of cancer in the treatment center will be included:
Breast, Colon, Prostate, Lung, Hematological malignancies
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Consilium-APP | – | Device: appPatients with oncological, medical treatment for breast cancer, colon cancer, prostate cancer, lung cancer or hematological malignancies. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with the most common types of cancer in the treatment center will be included: Breast, Colon, Prostate, Lung, Hematological malignancies
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Signed Informed Consent Form
- Women or men aged ≥ 18 years
- Patients with breast, colon, prostate, lung cancer or hemat. malignancies
- Initiation or change of therapy for the types of cancer mentioned above
- German speaking
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients whose compliance must be questioned, e.g. due to a psychological disorders or private life situation
- Patients with insufficient knowledge of smartphone use.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| appThe app is used to record the study parameters for a period of 90 days. The following measures are used for data collection: * Interview during regular consultation with doctor * Web-App for gathering doctors data * "Consilium" Smartphone App for gathering patient data During the course of care, the patient enters in a regular manner symptoms and treatment side effects in the Smartphone app. A continuous capture of the symptoms and treatment side effect is provided. If no entry is made within 3 days the patient is prompted to enter the data via a push message. * Well-being through a patient rating on a visual analog scale * Registration of symptoms and treatment side effects is done through the app After completion of the study patients will be questioned according to: • Usability and usefulness of the Smartphone app | Device | Consilium-APP |
Primary outcome
Level of agreement
Time frame: 12 weeks of treatment
Level of agreement κ with respect to categories of common toxicity criteria (ECOG/CTCAE) categories between ePRO recording and the treating physician at time of consultation
6 secondary outcomes
ePRO and therapy side effects
Time frame: 12 weeks of treatment
Rating of different qualities of electronically reported symptoms in out-patient settings
Time frame: 12 weeks of treatment
Unplanned consultations
Time frame: 12 weeks of treatment
Hospital days
Time frame: 12 weeks of treatment
Patient characteristics for discontinued use of mobile monitoring
Time frame: 12 weeks of treatment
Usability and usefulness of smartphone app
Time frame: 12 weeks of treatment
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Mainly due to insufficient recruitment). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Feb 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38710048Trojan A, Kuhne C, Kiessling M, Schumacher J, Drose S, Singer C, Jackisch C, Thomssen C, Kullak-Ublick GA. Impact of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes on Unplanned Consultations and Hospitalizations in Patients With Cancer Undergoing Systemic Therapy: Results of a Patient-Reported Outcome Study Compared With Matched Retrospective Data. JMIR Form Res. 2024 May 6;8:e55917. doi: 10.2196/55917.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38573759Trojan A, Roth S, Atassi Z, Kiessling M, Zenhaeusern R, Kadvany Y, Schumacher J, Kullak-Ublick GA, Aapro M, Eniu A. Comparison of the Real-World Reporting of Symptoms and Well-Being for the HER2-Directed Trastuzumab Biosimilar Ogivri With Registry Data for Herceptin in the Treatment of Breast Cancer: Prospective Observational Study (OGIPRO) of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes. JMIR Cancer. 2024 Apr 4;10:e54178. doi: 10.2196/54178.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34383675Trojan A, Leuthold N, Thomssen C, Rody A, Winder T, Jakob A, Egger C, Held U, Jackisch C. The Effect of Collaborative Reviews of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes on the Congruence of Patient- and Clinician-Reported Toxicity in Cancer Patients Receiving Systemic Therapy: Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Clinical Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 5;23(8):e29271. doi: 10.2196/29271.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33729162Trojan A, Battig B, Mannhart M, Seifert B, Brauchbar MN, Egbring M. Effect of Collaborative Review of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes for Shared Reporting in Breast Cancer Patients: Descriptive Comparative Study. JMIR Cancer. 2021 Mar 17;7(1):e26950. doi: 10.2196/26950.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Telemedicine
Recruiting
Tele-HOPE: A Telehealth Pharmacist Opioid Patient Education Pilot Study
Hematopoietic and Lymphatic System Neoplasm, Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Recruiting
Telerehabilitation Compared With Clinic-Based Physiotherapy in Children With Spastic Cerebral Palsy
Spastic Cerebral Palsy
Recruiting
Scalable TELeheaLth Cancer CARe: The STELLAR Program to Treat Cancer Risk Behaviors
Obesity, Smoking Cessation
Active, not recruiting
Enhancing Telemedicine for T2D
Type 2 Diabetes
Recruiting
The Impact of Telemedicine, Using the Caller's Mobile Phone Camera, on the Quality of Care Provided to Adult Patients Contacting the 15 Centre for Acute Dyspnea
Dyspnea
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Andreas Trojan, Prof. Dr. med. principal investigator
OnkoZentrum Zürich AG
18 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Telemedicine and eHealth, run by OnkoZentrum Zürich AG at 18 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Feb 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 18 sites in Switzerland, Germany, Austria. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Mainly due to insufficient recruitment). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Level of agreement (time frame: 12 weeks of treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03578731, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Feb 2022.