AzTrials
AzTrials

Osteo Arthritis ShouldersPhase 2/3BMACNCT03580148

BMA vs Cortisone for Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis

A Phase 2/3 study testing Cortisone and Bone Marrow Aspirate in people with Osteo Arthritis Shoulders, run by Women's College Hospital at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This randomized trial seeks to investigate the difference if any between cortisone injection versus bone marrow aspirate injection in the glenohumeral joint of patients with confirmed osteoarthritis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Osteo Arthritis Shoulders
What is being tested?
Cortisone and Bone Marrow Aspirate
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
34 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
8 Oct 2015to 23 Nov 2021
Phase
Phase 2/3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Men or women above the age of 18 - 65
  • Primary diagnosis of glenohumeral joint osteoarthritis (Samilson and Prieto Stage 1, 2 or 3)
  • Provision of informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Prior condition (such as trauma, avascular necrosis, fracture, iatrogenic or chondrolysis) resulting in secondary osteoarthritis
  • Previous surgical intervention for GHJ OA
  • Previous injection of cortisone or other substance
  • Inability to comply with rehabilitation or form completion
  • Likely problems, in the judgement of the investigators, with maintaining follow-up (i.e. patients with no fixed address, patients not mentally competent to give consent, etc.)
  • WSIB involvement
  • Lawsuit involvement

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Women's College Hospital

    Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1B2

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Trial of Cortisone Injection Versus Bone Marrow Aspirate Injection Therapy for Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis

This randomized trial seeks to investigate the difference if any between cortisone injection versus bone marrow aspirate injection in the glenohumeral joint of patients with confirmed osteoarthritis. The investigators hope that results from a prospective randomized controlled pilot study on bone marrow aspirate (BMA) glenohumeral joint (GHJ) injections will provide valuable early information on an alternative treatment for GHJ osteoarthritis (OA). This novel study will also contribute clinical data to the growing pool of research around BMA in the treatment of osteoarthritis. This study has the potential to uncover a new and more effective therapy to add to the arsenal of an orthopaedic surgeon in the management of GHJ OA. This would provide improved care and treatment for those disabled by GHJ OA. Additionally, this knowledge would be applicable to a variety of medical practitioners who treat GHJ OA from the general orthopaedic surgeon to pain subspecialists.

Read the detailed description

Glenohumeral joint (GHJ) osteoarthritis (OA) is a painful, progressive and debilitating condition that impairs quality of life. Currently, the only "cure" for arthritis is total joint replacement. This is a major operation that carries with it significant risks including infection, stiffness, limited range of motion, peri-prosthetic fracture and loosening. Furthermore, there are permanent post-operative restrictions, and in young or active people there is a significant rate of early revision surgery. Therefore, the goal of early shoulder OA management is symptom control, and postponement or prevention of the need for joint replacement.

Initial management options include physical therapy, pain-control medications, and intra-articular injections. Corticosteroid injections are the most commonly utilized injectables used in GHJ OA, with previous studies reporting good, short term pain relief and clinical improvement with corticosteroid injections for shoulder OA. However, corticosteroid injections may damage the collagen matrix of tendons and ligaments around the shoulder with repeated injections. Intra-articular hyaluronic acid (HA) injections have been proposed as an alternative to corticosteroid injections, and have demonstrated a clinically significant improvement in pain and function, albeit with a limited effect size.

Bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMA) injections is a relatively recent option for the treatment of OA. BMA is a biological product that is produced through the centrifugation of the patient's own bone marrow, producing a cellular equivalent to iliac crest bone graft. This aspirate has been shown to contain, among other nucleated cells, mesenchymal stem cells (MSC's) and hematopoietic stem cells (which can directly convert to stromal MSC's).Furthermore, this minimally invasive procedure can be conducted as an outpatient procedure, saving operating room time.

Preliminary studies on intra-articular knee injections of BMA for early OA have reported statistically significant benefits in improved pain scores and function, with few adverse effects. The mechanism of action is likely through paracrine effects exerted by MSCs with the upshot being anti-inflammatory and potentially regenerative capabilities. These results are encouraging for the use of BMA in the shoulder, which is a non-weight bearing joint. Therefore, the investigators believe that the clinical improvements seen with BMA injections for knee OA will also be seen in the shoulder to an equal or greater extent.

To date there are no trials investigating injectable stem cell therapies in the shoulder. The investigators aim to conduct a randomized controlled study to test the safety and efficacy of BMA injections for the treatment of early to mid-stage GHJ OA.

1.2 Significance of Current Study

Results from a prospective randomized controlled pilot study on BMA GHJ injections will provide valuable early information on an alternative treatment for GHJ OA. This novel study will also contribute clinical data to the growing pool of research around BMA in the treatment of osteoarthritis.

This research group is proposing a randomized clinical trial prospectively comparing BMA GHJ injections versus Depo Medrol Cortisone GHJ injections. This study will include comprehensive clinical, functional and joint specific patient outcome scores.

After a comprehensive literature review, to the investigators knowledge, there are no studies on the efficacy of BMA injections for management of GHJ OA. Thus, this study will be the first to report on safety, efficacy and costs associated with BMA injections.

This innovative study has the potential to uncover a new and more effective therapy to add to the arsenal of an orthopaedic surgeon in the management of GHJ OA. This would provide improved care and treatment for people disabled by GHJ OA. Additionally, this knowledge would be applicable to a variety of medical practitioners who treat GHJ OA from the general orthopaedic surgeon to pain subspecialists.

Being tested
Cortisone, Bone Marrow Aspirate
Keywords
osteoarthritis, glenohumeral joint, arthritis, shoulder
Medical subject headings
Osteoarthritis, Arthritis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CortisoneDrug

    Also called 00030767 DEPO-MEDROL 80 MG/ML

    Patients randomized to receive this study intervention will undergo one ultrasound guided 80mg Depo Medrol GHJ injection

  • Bone Marrow AspirateBiological

    Also called BMA

    Patients randomized to receive this study intervention will have, under sterile conditions and after injection of local anesthetic, 10 mls of bone marrow aspirate taken from the posterior superior iliac spine and injected under ultrasound guidance to the glenohumeral joint

Study groups in NCT03580148
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CortisoneActive comparatorPatients randomized to this arm will receive one (1) ultrasound guided injection of 80mg Depo Medrol cortisone in the glenohumeral joint of the affected shoulder. Procedure time of approximately 10 minutes
Receives: Drug: Cortisone
Bone Marrow AspirateActive comparatorPatients randomized to this arm will receive one (1) ultrasound injection of bone marrow aspirate, harvested from the posterior superior iliac spine, and injected into the glenohumeral joint of the affected shoulder. Procedure time of approximately 45 minutes
Receives: Biological: Bone Marrow Aspirate

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder (WOOS) Index

    A 19 question, quality of life measurement tool for patients with osteoarthritis of the shoulder. WOOS assesses change in specific areas of daily life function from scores captured at pre injection baseline to those captured at 3, 6 and 12 month intervals.

    Patient responses are recorded with a mark placed on a scale by the patient for each of the 19 questions, with responses being measured quantitatively out of 100 per question, totaled per subsection (Physical Symptoms/600; Sports and Recreation/Work/500; Lifestyle/500;Emotions/300) , totaled out of 1900 overall. Marks placed at or near 0 on the scale indicate patient is not experiencing or affected by the symptom described in the question, while marks at or near 100 indicate the patient is very affected.

    Baseline survey completed on the day of the injection, repeated at 3, 6 and 12 months post injection to compare change in sub section score, and total score out of 1900 at the given time point, to the scores captured at baseline.

    Measured: Survey administered at Baseline, and then change from baseline measured at 3 months post injection, 6 months post injection, and 12 months post injection with the survey being administered again at each of these time points.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Jul 2018
  2. Study start8 Oct 2015
  3. Primary completion30 Jul 2020
  4. Study completion23 Nov 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2/3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
34 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03580148
Sponsor's protocol ID
2015-0069-B
Acronym
BMAC
Status last verified
Jul 2022
First submitted
22 Jun 2018
Last updated
20 Jul 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Levy JC, Virani NA, Frankle MA, Cuff D, Pupello DR, Hamelin JA. Young patients with shoulder chondrolysis following arthroscopic shoulder surgery treated with total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 May-Jun;17(3):380-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.11.004. Epub 2008 Mar 7.

    PubMed 18329295
  • Brander VA, Gomberawalla A, Chambers M, Bowen M, Nuber G. Efficacy and safety of hylan G-F 20 for symptomatic glenohumeral osteoarthritis: a prospective, pilot study. PM R. 2010 Apr;2(4):259-67. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.02.010.

    PubMed 20430327
  • Millett PJ, Gobezie R, Boykin RE. Shoulder osteoarthritis: diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician. 2008 Sep 1;78(5):605-11.

    PubMed 18788237
  • Silverstein E, Leger R, Shea KP. The use of intra-articular hylan G-F 20 in the treatment of symptomatic osteoarthritis of the shoulder: a preliminary study. Am J Sports Med. 2007 Jun;35(6):979-85. doi: 10.1177/0363546507300256. Epub 2007 Mar 29.

    PubMed 17395958
  • Merolla G, Sperling JW, Paladini P, Porcellini G. Efficacy of Hylan G-F 20 versus 6-methylprednisolone acetate in painful shoulder osteoarthritis: a retrospective controlled trial. Musculoskelet Surg. 2011 Dec;95(3):215-24. doi: 10.1007/s12306-011-0138-3. Epub 2011 May 13.

    PubMed 21567154
  • van der Windt DA, Koes BW, Deville W, Boeke AJ, de Jong BA, Bouter LM. Effectiveness of corticosteroid injections versus physiotherapy for treatment of painful stiff shoulder in primary care: randomised trial. BMJ. 1998 Nov 7;317(7168):1292-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7168.1292.

    PubMed 9804720
  • Colen S, Geervliet P, Haverkamp D, Van Den Bekerom MP. Intra-articular infiltration therapy for patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis: A systematic review of the literature. Int J Shoulder Surg. 2014 Oct;8(4):114-21. doi: 10.4103/0973-6042.145252.

    PubMed 25538430
  • Wolfstadt JI, Cole BJ, Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Viswanathan S, Chahal J. Current concepts: the role of mesenchymal stem cells in the management of knee osteoarthritis. Sports Health. 2015 Jan;7(1):38-44. doi: 10.1177/1941738114529727.

    PubMed 25553211
  • Matsumoto T, Kawamoto A, Kuroda R, Ishikawa M, Mifune Y, Iwasaki H, Miwa M, Horii M, Hayashi S, Oyamada A, Nishimura H, Murasawa S, Doita M, Kurosaka M, Asahara T. Therapeutic potential of vasculogenesis and osteogenesis promoted by peripheral blood CD34-positive cells for functional bone healing. Am J Pathol. 2006 Oct;169(4):1440-57. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2006.060064.

    PubMed 17003498
  • Matsumoto T, Mifune Y, Kawamoto A, Kuroda R, Shoji T, Iwasaki H, Suzuki T, Oyamada A, Horii M, Yokoyama A, Nishimura H, Lee SY, Miwa M, Doita M, Kurosaka M, Asahara T. Fracture induced mobilization and incorporation of bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells for bone healing. J Cell Physiol. 2008 Apr;215(1):234-42. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21309.

    PubMed 18205179
  • Mifune Y, Matsumoto T, Kawamoto A, Kuroda R, Shoji T, Iwasaki H, Kwon SM, Miwa M, Kurosaka M, Asahara T. Local delivery of granulocyte colony stimulating factor-mobilized CD34-positive progenitor cells using bioscaffold for modality of unhealing bone fracture. Stem Cells. 2008 Jun;26(6):1395-405. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0820. Epub 2008 Apr 3.

    PubMed 18388308
  • Tondreau T, Meuleman N, Delforge A, Dejeneffe M, Leroy R, Massy M, Mortier C, Bron D, Lagneaux L. Mesenchymal stem cells derived from CD133-positive cells in mobilized peripheral blood and cord blood: proliferation, Oct4 expression, and plasticity. Stem Cells. 2005 Sep;23(8):1105-12. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2004-0330. Epub 2005 Jun 13.

    PubMed 15955825
  • Centeno C, Pitts J, Al-Sayegh H, Freeman M. Efficacy of autologous bone marrow concentrate for knee osteoarthritis with and without adipose graft. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:370621. doi: 10.1155/2014/370621. Epub 2014 Sep 7.

    PubMed 25276781
  • Kim JD, Lee GW, Jung GH, Kim CK, Kim T, Park JH, Cha SS, You YB. Clinical outcome of autologous bone marrow aspirates concentrate (BMAC) injection in degenerative arthritis of the knee. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014 Dec;24(8):1505-11. doi: 10.1007/s00590-013-1393-9. Epub 2014 Jan 8.

    PubMed 24398701
  • Centeno CJ, Schultz JR, Cheever M, Robinson B, Freeman M, Marasco W. Safety and complications reporting on the re-implantation of culture-expanded mesenchymal stem cells using autologous platelet lysate technique. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2010 Mar;5(1):81-93. doi: 10.2174/157488810790442796.

    PubMed 19951252

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2/3 study testing Cortisone and Bone Marrow Aspirate in people with Osteo Arthritis Shoulders, run by Women's College Hospital at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jul 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder (WOOS) Index (time frame: Survey administered at Baseline, and then change from baseline measured at 3 months post injection, 6 months post injection, and 12 months post injection with the survey being administered again at each of these time points.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03580148, which also lists 21 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jul 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in