AzTrials
AzTrials

Rectal CancerBRIDGENCT03581344

BReak Interval Delayed Surgery for Gastrointestinal Extraperitoneal Rectal Cancer

A study testing Repetition of Re-staging in people with Rectal Cancer, run by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS at 1 site in Italy.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a randomized multicentric clinical trial in patients affected by resectable rectal cancer, cT2N1-2, cT3N0-2, MRF -, aiming to evaluate the impact of the interval between chemoradiotherapy and surgery on the pathological response. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Rectal Cancer
What is being tested?
Repetition of Re-staging
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
148 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
1 Oct 2018to 17 Sep 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • ECOG Performance Status 0-1
  • Histological confirmation of Adenocarcinoma
  • Rectal tumor localized within 12 cm from the internal anal sphincter (IAS)
  • Clinical stage cT2N1-2, M0; cT3, N0-N2, M0 and MRF - , EMVI -
  • Absence of major comorbidities contraindicating oncological treatments
  • Major/complete clinical-instrumental response after CRT treatment
  • Informed consent acquisition

Who cannot join

  • cT4 and/or mesorectal fascia involvement (MRF+) and or EMVI +
  • T localized at a distance > 12 cm from the internal anal sphincter (IAS)
  • Presence of extramesorectal nodes
  • Presence of distant metastases
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding status
  • Diagnosis of tumor in other sites treated within the last five years, with the exception of basal cell skin carcinoma or in situ carcinoma of the cervix
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Absolute contraindication to pelvic radiotherapy, chemotherapy and/or surgery
  • Contraindication to magnetic resonance imaging and/or endoscopy
  • Informed consent absence
  • Partial response, "no-change" or disease progression at restaging after 7-8 weeks from CRT end

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Fondazione policlinico universitario a. gemelli IRCCS

    Rome, 00164

    Maria A Gambacorta, MD, nettagambacorta@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of the Interval Between Chemoradiotherapy and Surgery on Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Response:a Multicentric Randomized Phase III Study

This is a randomized multicentric clinical trial in patients affected by resectable rectal cancer, cT2N1-2, cT3N0-2, MRF -, aiming to evaluate the impact of the interval between chemoradiotherapy and surgery on the pathological response.

Patients will undergo a neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy treatment and those achieving a major or complete clinical and instrumental response will then be randomized and submitted to surgery with two options: the first group will be operated after an interval of 9-11 weeks, while the second will undergo surgery at 13-16 weeks, after a further clinical and instrumental re-evaluation 11-12 weeks after the end of chemoradiotherapy.

Read the detailed description

The proposed study is a randomized multicentric phase III study. The Patients included in the study will undergo a chemoradiotherapy neoadjuvant treatment.

Patients will undergo a clinical-instrumental restaging at 7-8 weeks and will be randomized in two groups in case of major or complete response:

  1. Surgery 9-11 weeks after the end of neoadjuvant treatment
  2. Second clinical and instrumental re-evaluation after 11-12 weeks and then surgery 13-16 weeks after the end of chemoradiotherapy.

Only patients who underwent preoperative chemoradiotherapy and achieved a complete or major response at the clinical-instrumental restaging 7-8 weeks after the end of neoadjuvant treatment will be included in the study.

The control arm of the BRIDGE-1 study is represented by patients undergoing surgery 9-11 weeks after the end of chemoradiotherapy, whose major/complete response has to be assessed with clinical-instrumental exams to be performed 7-8 weeks after the end of chemoradiotherapy.

The experimental arm of the the BRIDGE-1 study is represented by patients undergoing surgery 13-16 weeks after the end of chemoradiotherapy, showing a major/complete response at the clinical-instrumental exams to be performed 7-8 weeks after the end of chemoradiotherapy. These patients will undergo a new clinical and instrumental evaluation, 11-12 weeks after the end of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy treatment, prior to be submitted to the delayed surgical procedure.

Patients will be recruited in the two different arms, according to a randomized assignment, realized through an electronic table, in order to assure the efficacy of this study. Patients will be divided according to gender, age, stage and tumour site (low, medium and high) in each centre.

When a patient will be assigned to a specific arm, the randomization procedure will recruit a similar patient in the other arm.

CLINICAL STAGING AND RESTAGING EVALUATION TNM clinical and pathological stages are reported according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th Edition, adenocarcinoma histological grading according to WHO classification.

Staging and baseline clinical evaluation

  1. Patient history
  2. Digital rectal examination
  3. Recto-colonoscopy + biopsy (in case of impossibility to perform colonoscopy due to stenosing lesion, rectoscopy + biopsy and double-contrast barium enema or colon CT or colonoscopy within 6 months from surgery are suggested)
  4. Pelvic MRI for loco-regional staging
  5. CT of the thorax and abdomen for distant metastases staging
  6. PET-CT (optional)
  7. CEA test
  8. Quality of Life (QoL) questionnaires compilation

Restaging at 7-8 weeks

  1. Digital rectal examination
  2. Pelvic MRI
  3. PET-CT if performed during staging
  4. Rectoscopy (in case of major/complete response)
  5. CEA test
  6. Quality of Life (QoL) questionnaires compilation

7.3 Restaging at 11-12 weeks (for patients randomized in the delayed surgery arm)

  1. Digital rectal examination
  2. Pelvic MRI
  3. PET-CT if previously performed
  4. Rectoscopy
  5. CEA test

As secondary outcomes, acute and late toxicities, quality of life, bowel function, rectal continence and sexual activity will be evaluated in this study.

PREOPERATIVE CHEMORADIOTHERAPY TREATMENT Chemoradiotherapy treatment schedule considers a total radiotherapy dose of 55 Gy in 5 weeks, delivered with a 3D concomitant boost or Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) technique.

Concomitant chemotherapy considers administration of Capecitabine for the whole radiotherapy course.

SURGICAL APPROACH Surgery will be performed according to standard techniques using the " open " approach, laparoscopic or robotic, according to surgeon's preference and including both anterior resection of the rectum and abdominoperineal rectal resection with mesorectal total excision (Total Mesorectal Excision, TME).

The possibility of sphincter salvage will be evaluated collectively by the members of the multidisciplinary team at the time of diagnosis, at first re-evaluation and in case of second re-evaluation.

PATHOLOGICAL EVALUATION Resected rectal specimens will undergo gross examination in order to macroscopically evaluate the status of the mesorectal margin.

After marking with indian ink the mesorectal margin, cutting axially the colorectal segment on its anti-mesorectal side and fixating it in formalin, transverse sections of the surgical specimen will be serially cut.

In case of macroscopic evidence of disease, sampling of the most infiltrated area and of the tumoral area with the minimum distance from the mesorectal margin, which will be included, will be performed.

In case of macroscopic absence or in the suspect of residual disease, the initial tumour site will be completely included in the specimen, localizing it from clinical reports with the potential aid of endoscopic tattoos and/or tissue alterations by the treatment (scar retraction or increase of tissue consistency).

In case of negative reports of the first histological sections, each inclusion will undergo three levels of histological section series.

The histopathological evaluation of the response to the therapy will be scored according to the following classifications: Mandard A.M., et al; Washington MK et al/College of American Pathologists; in presence of positive nodes, the Nottingham Rectal Cancer Prognostic Index (NRPI) score will also be used.

ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY The protocol does not establish criteria for the administration of adjuvant systemic treatment.

The single center maintains the discretion to administer postoperative chemotherapy.

FOLLOW-UP The follow-up program recommended in the study is described in the national guidelines in effect.

Patients will undergo a clinical evaluation 1 month after surgery, every third month during the first year and then every sixth month up to the fifth year.

During follow-up visits the following tests will be performed and evaluated :

  1. Physical examination and digital rectal exam ;
  2. CEA and routine blood chemistry screen ;
  3. Colonoscopy (at 1 year, if negative repeat after 3 years, if still negative repeat after 5 years) ;
  4. Thoracic-abdominal-pelvic CT 3 months after surgery and then every sixth 6 month for the first 2 years, then annually (unless different clinical indication, i.e. suspicious lesions requiring short-term monitoring), in rotation with abdominal US ;
  5. Complete abdominal US, each 6 months for the first 2 years, the annually (unless different clinical indication, i.e. suspicious lesions requiring short-term monitoring), in succession with Thoracic-abdominal-pelvic CT ;
  6. Adverse events report (CTCAE v.04)
  7. Quality of life (QoL) questionnaires to be filled during first follow up visits and then at 6 and 12 months.
Conditions
Rectal Cancer
Being tested
Repetition of Re-staging
Keywords
Conservative Treatment, Neoadjuvant Therapy, Radiotherapy
Medical subject headings
Rectal Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Repetition of Re-stagingDiagnostic test

    Second clinical and instrumental re-evaluation after 11-12 weeks and then surgery 13-16 weeks after the end of chemoradiotherapy if major or complete response at 7-8 weeks

Study groups in NCT03581344
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Control armNo interventionPatients undergoing surgery 9-11 weeks after the end of chemoradiotherapy, whose major/complete response has to be assessed with clinical-instrumental exams to be performed 7-8 weeks after the end of chemoradiotherapy.
Experimental armExperimentalPatients undergoing surgery 13-16 weeks after the end of chemoradiotherapy, (length of surgical interval ) showing a major/complete response at the clinical-instrumental exams to be performed 7-8 weeks after the end of chemoradiotherapy. These patients will undergo a repetition of re-staging (a second clinical and instrumental re-evaluation after 11-12 weeks and then surgery 13-16 weeks after the end of chemoradiotherapy.)
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Repetition of Re-staging

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Complete response (CR) ypT0N0

    Absence of tumoral cells in the rectum and mesorectal nodes, examined by the pathologist

    Measured: 9-16 weeks: surgery

  2. TRG (Tumor Regression Grade)

    Histological assessment of the response of rectal cancer to neoadjuvant treatment

    Measured: 9-16 weeks: surgery

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Overall survival

    The length of time from either the date of diagnosis that patients diagnosed with the disease are still alive

    Measured: 24-60 months

  2. Disease free survival

    The length of time after primary treatment for a cancer ends that the patient survives without any signs or symptoms of that cancer

    Measured: 24-60 months

  3. Local recurrence free survival

    The length of time after primary treatment for a cancer ends that the patient survives without any signs or symptoms of local recurrence

    Measured: 24-60 months

  4. Metastasis free survival

    The length of time after primary treatment for a cancer ends that the patient survives without any signs or symptoms of distant metastasis

    Measured: 24-60 months

  5. Concordance between major clinical response (ymCR) or complete clinical response (ycCR) at imaging and ypCR

    Concordance between clinical-instrumental restaging and analysis of pathological specimen

    Measured: 24-60 months

  6. Colostomy free survival

    The length of time after primary treatment for a cancer ends that the patient survives without colostomy

    Measured: 24-60 months

  7. Impact of therapy on bowel function

    Evaluating impact of therapy on bowel function according to MSKCC questionary (Temple LK and al, Dis Colon Rectum 2005: 48: 1353-1365)

    The MSKCC Bowel Function questionnaire is a selfadministered psychometric instrument designed to assess bowel function in patients who undergo sphincterpreserving surgery for rectal cancer. The questionnaire includes 18 items involving three subscales (frequency, dietary and urgency/soilage), four individual items of clinical significance (Q4: incomplete emptying after a bowel movement, Q6: a second bowel movement within 15 min, Q7: knowing difference between gas and bowel movements, Q12: unable to control the passage of flatus) and one total score that is obtained by summing all 18 items.

    Measured: 24-60 months

  8. Impact of therapy on fecal continence

    Evaluating impact of therapy on fecal incontinence according to Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Instrument (Rockwood et al., Dis Colon Rectum. 2000 Jan;43(1):9-16; discussion 16-7).

    Total of 29 items; these items form four scales: Lifestyle (10 items), Coping/Behavior (9 items), Depression/Self-Perception (7 items), and Embarrassment. (3 items).

    Scales range from 1 to 5, with a 1 indicating a lower functional status of quality of life. Scale scores are the average (mean) response to all items in the scale Scale 1. Lifestyle, ten items: Q2a Q2b Q2c Q2d Q2e Q2g Q2h Q3b Q31 Q3m Scale 2. Coping/Behavior, nine items: Q2f Q2i Q2j Q2k Q2m Q3d Q3h Q3j Q3n Scale 3. Depression/Self Perception, seven items: Q1 Q3d Q3f Q3g Q3i Q3k Q4, (Question 1 is reverse coded.) Scale 4. Embarrassment, three items: Q21 Q3a Q3e

    Measured: 24-60 months

  9. Impact of therapy on sexual activity

    Evaluating impact of therapy on fecal incontinence according to European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ - CR29 It is composed of 29 items that evaluate symptoms (gastrointestinal, urinary, pain and others) and functional areas (sexual, body image and others) that are associated with colorectal cancer and its treatments. There are separate scales for patients with or without stoma (which can be compared) and separate items to evaluate sexual function for men and women. The questionnaire has a Likert scale of four response categories.

    Measured: 24-60 months

  10. Impact of therapy on quality of life (QoL)

    Evaluating impact of therapy on fecal incontinence according to EORTC QLQ-C30 It is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include 5 functional scales, 3 symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and 6 single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100.

    Thus a high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems.

    For scoring these scales:

    1. Estimate the average of the items that contribute to the scale; this is the raw score.
    2. Use a linear transformation to standardise the raw score, so that scores range from 0 to 100; a higher score represents a higher ("better") level of functioning, or a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.

    Measured: 24-60 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Jul 2018
  2. Study start1 Oct 2018
  3. Primary completion17 Sep 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion17 Sep 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
The Patients included in the study will undergo a chemoradiotherapy neoadjuvant treatment. Patients will undergo a clinical-instrumental restaging at 7-8 weeks and will be randomized in two groups in case of major or complete response: 1. Surgery 9-11 weeks after the end of neoadjuvant treatment 2. Second clinical and instrumental re-evaluation after 11-12 weeks and then surgery 13-16 weeks after the end of chemoradiotherapy.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
148 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03581344
Sponsor's protocol ID
1908
Acronym
BRIDGE
Status last verified
Dec 2021
First submitted
14 Jun 2018
Last updated
11 Jan 2022
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Chiloiro G, Meldolesi E, Corvari B, Romano A, Barbaro B, Coco C, Crucitti A, Genovesi D, Lupattelli M, Mantello G, Menghi R, Falchetto Osti M, Persiani R, Petruzziello L, Ricci R, Sofo L, Valentini C, De Paoli A, Valentini V, Antonietta Gambacorta M. BRIDGE -1 TRIAL: BReak Interval Delayed surgery for Gastrointestinal Extraperitoneal rectal cancer, a multicentric phase III randomized trial. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2022 Mar 8;34:30-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.03.002. eCollection 2022 May.

    PubMed 35340685

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Repetition of Re-staging in people with Rectal Cancer, run by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jan 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Maria Antonietta Gambacorta ((+39)0630155339, mariaantonietta.gambacorta@policlinicogemelli.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Complete response (CR) ypT0N0 (time frame: 9-16 weeks: surgery). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03581344, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jan 2022.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
BRIDGE Clinical Trial NCT03581344 | AzTrials