AzTrials
AzTrials

Hematoma, Subdural, ChronicPhase 3TORCHNCT03582293

Tranexamic Acid to Prevent OpeRation in Chronic Subdural Hematoma

A Phase 3 study testing Tranexamic Acid 500Mg Tablet in people with Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic, run by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) at 1 site in Netherlands.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Rationale: Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is a frequently occurring disease, occurring mainly in the elderly. Surgical evacuation is effective, but also associated with life-threatening risks. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic
What is being tested?
Tranexamic Acid 500Mg Tablet
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
554 participants
Where
1 siteNetherlands
Study dates
19 Jun 2018to 30 Oct 2029
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • On CT confirmed cSDH
  • Primary conservative treatment, based on clinical symptoms: Glasgow Coma Scale score >=14, mNIHSS score <=4 and a stable neurological deficit (no new, or progression of, symptoms between the assessment by the neurologist and the assessment by the neurosurgeon).

Who cannot join

  • Primary surgical treatment based on one or more of the following symptoms or parameters: medically intractable headache, midline shift >10mm, imminent death within 24 hours;
  • Structural causes for subdural haemorrhage, e.g. arachnoid cysts, cortical vascular malformations and a history of cranial surgery <1year;
  • Aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage;
  • Active treatment for deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism or cerebral thrombosis (secondary prophylaxis is not considered to be active treatment);
  • Active intravascular clotting or disseminated intravascular coagulation;
  • Known hypersensitivity or allergy to TXA or to any of the ingredients;
Show all 12Show fewer
  • History of a blood coagulation disorder (hypercoagulability disorder);
  • History of severe impairment of renal function (eGFR <30ml/min or serum creatinine >150μmol/L);
  • History of anaemia (haemoglobin <6mmol/L);
  • History of convulsions;
  • History of inability to safely swallow oral medication.
  • Inability to obtain informed consent from the patient or legal representative (when the patient has a depressed level of consciousness as described in paragraph 11.2), including language barrier;

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

William P Vandertop, MD PhD contact

+31205669111 ext. 63316

w.p.vandertop@amsterdamumc.nl

Dagmar Verbaan, PhD contact

+31205663316

d.verbaan@amsterdamumc.nl

Netherlands1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Academic Medical Center

    Amsterdam, 1100DD

    William P Vandertop, MD, PhD, +31205663316, w.p.vandertop@amsterdamumc.nl

    D Verbaan, +31205663316, d.verbaan@amsterdamumc.nl

    Recruiting

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: Tranexamic Acid to Prevent OpeRation in Chronic Subdural Hematoma. A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicentre, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Rationale: Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is a frequently occurring disease, occurring mainly in the elderly. Surgical evacuation is effective, but also associated with life-threatening risks. In these old, often frail, patients with multi-comorbidity, surgery also comes with significant risks for future cognitive functioning and therefore, loss of independency. In five small retrospective series, tranexamic acid (TXA), an antifibrinolytic drug, showed a beneficial effect on the spontaneous resolution of the hematoma and, with that, the necessity for surgery. This randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial aims to prove the efficacy of TXA.

Objectives: Primarily to evaluate the efficacy of TXA to prevent surgery for cSDH. Secondarily to evaluate the efficacy of TXA to reduce cSDH volume, neurological impairment (mNIHSS), the incidence of falling incidents, the mortality rate, the use of care and health-related costs (iMCQ and iPCQ), to improve cognitive functioning (MOCA), performance in activities of daily living (Barthel and Lawton-Brody), functional outcome (mRS), the level of quality of life.

Read more

Study design: Double-blind placebo-controlled multicentre randomized clinical trial.

Study population: All patients, age 50 and above, diagnosed with cSDH for whom a conservative treatment is selected as primary treatment strategy.

Intervention: The intervention group will receive oral TXA 500mg twice daily for 4 weeks, the control group will receive a placebo twice daily. The TXA or placebo treatment is additional to standard care.

Main study endpoint: The number of patients requiring surgery within 12 weeks after start treatment.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Patients will use the study medication twice daily for four weeks. Follow-up is at 4, 8and 12 weeks with a standard CT-scan of the head, outpatient clinic visits and 4 patient-reported questionnaires. These outpatient clinic visits are standard care; the third CT-scan, the questionnaires and extra clinical tests are extra. Each patient may benefit from the study if the study medication proves effective in preventing surgery for cSDH, whereas the risk of potential side effects of the medication is slight (e.g. the risk of thromboembolic events is only 0.01-0.1%). Surgery remains a possibility for those patients in whom study medication is not effective.

Read the detailed description
  1. INTRODUCTION AND RATIONALE Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is a frequently occurring neurological disease of the elderly and common in daily neurosurgical practice. It consists of an extracerebral encapsulated collection of mostly liquefied old hematoma, located between the dura and arachnoid. The original small, and often asymptomatic, haemorrhage is caused by rupture of a bridging vein after, often minor, head trauma. Due to generalized cerebral atrophy, increased venous fragility, and the more frequent use of anticoagulation therapy, older people are more at risk of developing a cSDH.

During several weeks, the original hematoma is encapsulated by a membrane consisting of weak neocapillaries from where recurrent small bleedings occur. The pathophysiological mechanism is thought to be a problem in the local haemostasis due to fibrin degradation products of the original small hematoma that inhibit further haemostasis in the subdural space. Together with an osmotic draw of water, owing to its high protein content, this results in growth of the hematoma. Therefore, it usually takes several weeks for the cSDH to grow and become symptomatic.

Signs and symptoms arise due to compression of brain tissue. These can be generalised, such as headaches, light-headedness, cognitive disturbances, apathy, somnolence, seizures, frequent falling and depression. Also focal deficits, such as dysphasia, motor weakness or sensory disturbances, can be symptoms of a cSDH.

The current incidence of cSDH is estimated to be 15/100,000 per year. The number of patients with cSDH is expected to increase considerably in the near future due to the continuing growth of the elderly population, and the increase in the use of anticoagulation and anti-aggregation therapy. By 2030, the incidence is expected to rise up to 20/100,000 per year, thus making cSDH the most common neurosurgical condition in adults. In The Netherlands, this comes down to 3,600 new patients each year.

Treatment Treatment options are conservative and surgical. Conservative treatment currently consists of a wait-and-scan policy in which the patient is regularly monitored for neurological deterioration and growth of the hematoma on follow-up imaging. Anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy is discontinued in low-risk patients, based on individual risk-benefit assessment and the discretion of the treating physician. If the clinical condition of the patient worsens, the indication for surgical evacuation of the hematoma is re-evaluated.

Spontaneous resolution of cSDH with a conservative treatment occurs in approximately 2.5% of patients, and is therefore relatively rare. Of all patients diagnosed with cSDH in The Netherlands, about 50% is primarily treated conservatively. Of these, around 75% still need an operation (own data). If the symptoms are serious or worsen over time, surgical evacuation of the hematoma is currently the designated therapy. This therapy is an effective treatment, but is also associated with life-threatening risks. In these old, often frail, patients with multi-comorbidity, surgery comes with significant risks for future cognitive functioning and, therefore, loss of independency. In a large series of 1205 patients, symptomatic recurrence after surgery was 9%, mortality 2% and unfavourable functional outcome 22%.

Outcome measurement Studies evaluating quality of life and functional outcome with cSDH patients are scarce. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score is usually the only clinical outcome parameter. A literature search for quality of life in cSDH results in only two clinical studies. The first used the postoperative mRS, Barthel Index and Sickness Impact Profile as outcome measurements; the second used a pre- and postoperative Karnofsky Performance Score.

Tranexamic acid As hyperfibrinolysis is thought to play a role in the liquefaction and enlargement of cSDH, pharmaceutical options to block fibrinolysis have been explored in an effort to eliminate the necessity for surgery. The use of tranexamic acid (TXA), an antifibrinolytic drug, has so far been reported in five small series. In the first retrospective series, a total of 21 patients were treated with TXA, of whom three after primary burr hole surgery. In none of these 21 patients, additional surgery was necessary. The second, a prospective pilot study in 14 patients, showed a 41% reduction of cSDH after surgery, and an additional 91% residual volume reduction on CT after 90 days, during oral TXA treatment of 650 mg per day, for a mean (SD) duration of 90 (27) days, without recurrence, re-expansion, or any complicating venous thromboembolisms. The third study, a case report series of three patients treated with 650mg TXA per day for one month after surgery for cSDH, showed no recurrences and thromboembolic complications. The fourth, a case report of one patient successfully treated primarily with TXA, was recently published, and finally, in the abstract of a Asian article, the authors conclude that administration of Gorei-San, a Japanese herbal Kampo medicine, combined with TXA has the potential to prevent recurrences of cSDH.

With these limited, however promising, data no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the role of TXA in the treatment of cSDH. Therefore, a prospective study evaluating the efficacy and safety of TXA is needed. Currently, two prospective trials (the TRACS study and the TRACE study are running in an effort to answer this question. The first study, a phase 2b trial with the aim to provide preliminary data required to plan a larger phase III trial, excludes patients using anticoagulants. These patients comprise a significant portion of the cSDH patient population, and therefore, the results of the TRACS study will be difficult to extrapolate to the future care of all cSDH patients. The second study (TRACE) is a randomised, observer blinded trial, investigating the value of treating cSDH patients with TXA after surgery. This is a different patient population than proposed in the investigators' trial, in which they plan to include only patients in whom the primary treatment is conservative. Also, both trials are set up with a primary radiological outcome parameter and therefore potentially provide insufficient clinically relevant information.

This phase III trial aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of TXA as an addition to a primary conservative treatment of cSDH, in an effort to prevent surgery for cSDH. Since surgical treatment under general anaesthesia and a hospital admittance of a minimum of two days is associated with significant morbidity, as described earlier, the investigators assume that preventing surgery also prevents deterioration of patients' quality of life. This trial is also the first in describing functional outcome and quality of life of cSDH patients in a prospective manner. Since the target population partially comprises patients with a depressed level of consciousness, and patients using anticoagulants and antiplatelets, these patient groups will be included in this trial as well.

Being tested
Tranexamic Acid 500Mg Tablet, Placebo oral capsule
Keywords
Tranexamic Acid, Antifibrinolytic Agents
Medical subject headings
Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Tranexamic Acid 500Mg TabletDrug

    Also called Cyklokapron

    orally twice daily for 28 days

  • Placebo oral capsuleDrug

    Oral placebo capsule two times a day for a total of 28 days

Study groups in NCT03582293
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Tranexamic AcidActive comparatorTranexamic acid 500mg two times a day orally for a total of 28 days
Receives: Drug: Tranexamic Acid 500Mg Tablet
PLACEBOPlacebo comparatorPlacebo capsules two times a day orally for a total of 28 days
Receives: Drug: Placebo oral capsule

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. surgery for cSDH

    number of patients who need to undergo surgery for cSDH

    Measured: within 12 weeks after start of treatment

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. cSDH volume

    change in cSDH volume (in ml) on follow-up CT scan of the head

    Measured: at four, eight and 12 weeks

  2. neurological impairment

    neurological impairment measured with the modified National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (mNIHSS) score, range 0 (normal) to 31 (severe neurological deficit)

    Measured: at four, eight and 12 weeks

  3. falling incidents

    number of falling incidents during study period

    Measured: during the 12 week study period

  4. cognitive functioning

    cognitive functioning measured with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) test, range 0 - 30, with a score of 26 and higher generally considered normal.

    Measured: at four, eight and 12 weeks

  5. performance in activities of daily living 1

    performance in activities of daily measured with the Barthel Index scale (range 0-20, with lower scores indicating increased disability)

    Measured: at 12 weeks

  6. functional outcome

    functional outcome measured with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, range 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death)

    Measured: at 12 weeks

  7. patient health status 1

    quality of life measured with the patient-reported Short Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36; eight scaled scores, range 0 (maximum disability) -100 (no disability).

    Measured: at 12 weeks

  8. mortality rate

    number and percentage of deaths during study period

    Measured: at 12 weeks

  9. use of care

    use of care measured with the Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ), which includes questions related to frequently occurring contacts with health care providers

    Measured: during the 12 week study period

  10. performance in activities of daily living 2

    performance in activities of daily measured with the Lawton-Brody scale, range 0 (low function, dependent) to 8 (high function, independent).

    Measured: at 12 weeks

  11. health-related costs

    health-related costs measured with the Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ), a standardized instrument including three modules for measuring and valuing productivity losses of paid work due to 1) absenteeism and 2) presenteeism and productivity losses related to 3) unpaid work.

    Measured: during the 12 week study period

  12. patient health status 2

    quality of life measured with the five dimensional EuroQol questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L, five dimensions with each 3 levels: 1-no problems, 2-some problems, and 3-extreme problems).

    Measured: at 12 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Jul 2018
  2. Study start19 Jun 2018
  3. Primary completion30 Apr 2029 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Oct 2029 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, randomized clinical trial.
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
554 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03582293
Sponsor's protocol ID
NL63794.018.18
Acronym
TORCH
Status last verified
Jun 2024
First submitted
19 Jun 2018
Last updated
20 Jun 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Sambasivan M. An overview of chronic subdural hematoma: experience with 2300 cases. Surg Neurol. 1997 May;47(5):418-22. doi: 10.1016/s0090-3019(97)00188-2.

    PubMed 9131021
  • Tagle P, Mery F, Torrealba G, Del Villar S, Carmona H, Campos M, Mendez J, Chicharro A. [Chronic subdural hematoma: a disease of elderly people]. Rev Med Chil. 2003 Feb;131(2):177-82. Spanish.

    PubMed 12708256
  • Adhiyaman V, Asghar M, Ganeshram KN, Bhowmick BK. Chronic subdural haematoma in the elderly. Postgrad Med J. 2002 Feb;78(916):71-5. doi: 10.1136/pmj.78.916.71.

    PubMed 11807186
  • Balser D, Farooq S, Mehmood T, Reyes M, Samadani U. Actual and projected incidence rates for chronic subdural hematomas in United States Veterans Administration and civilian populations. J Neurosurg. 2015 Nov;123(5):1209-15. doi: 10.3171/2014.9.JNS141550. Epub 2015 Mar 20.

    PubMed 25794342
  • Baechli H, Nordmann A, Bucher HC, Gratzl O. Demographics and prevalent risk factors of chronic subdural haematoma: results of a large single-center cohort study. Neurosurg Rev. 2004 Oct;27(4):263-6. doi: 10.1007/s10143-004-0337-6. Epub 2004 May 18.

    PubMed 15148652
  • Yang S, Zhang X, Jin Y. Spontaneous resolution of nontraumatic chronic subdural hematoma associated with anti-aggregation therapy. J Craniofac Surg. 2014 Jul;25(4):e363-5. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000814.

    PubMed 25006949
  • Berghauser Pont LM, Dippel DW, Verweij BH, Dirven CM, Dammers R. Ambivalence among neurologists and neurosurgeons on the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma: a national survey. Acta Neurol Belg. 2013 Mar;113(1):55-9. doi: 10.1007/s13760-012-0130-1. Epub 2012 Sep 14.

    PubMed 22975837
  • Brennan PM, Kolias AG, Joannides AJ, Shapey J, Marcus HJ, Gregson BA, Grover PJ, Hutchinson PJ, Coulter IC; British Neurosurgical Trainee Research Collaborative. The management and outcome for patients with chronic subdural hematoma: a prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study in the United Kingdom. J Neurosurg. 2017 Oct;127(4):732-739. doi: 10.3171/2016.8.JNS16134. Epub 2016 Nov 11.

    PubMed 27834599
  • Forster MT, Mathe AK, Senft C, Scharrer I, Seifert V, Gerlach R. The influence of preoperative anticoagulation on outcome and quality of life after surgical treatment of chronic subdural hematoma. J Clin Neurosci. 2010 Aug;17(8):975-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2009.11.023. Epub 2010 May 23.

    PubMed 20580997
  • Bacigaluppi S, Guastalli F, Bragazzi NL, Balestrino A, Bruzzi P, Zona G. Prognostic factors in chronic subdural hematoma: results from a monocentric consecutive surgical series of 605 patients. J Neurosurg Sci. 2021 Feb;65(1):14-23. doi: 10.23736/S0390-5616.17.04103-0. Epub 2017 Sep 28.

    PubMed 28959873
  • Poulsen FR, Munthe S, Soe M, Halle B. Perindopril and residual chronic subdural hematoma volumes six weeks after burr hole surgery: a randomized trial. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014 Aug;123:4-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 May 14.

    PubMed 25012003
  • Berghauser Pont LM, Dirven CM, Dippel DW, Verweij BH, Dammers R. The role of corticosteroids in the management of chronic subdural hematoma: a systematic review. Eur J Neurol. 2012 Nov;19(11):1397-403. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2012.03768.x. Epub 2012 May 29.

    PubMed 22642223
  • Stary JM, Hutchins L, Vega RA. Tranexamic Acid for Recurring Subdural Hematomas Following Surgical Evacuation: A Clinical Case Series. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2016 Sep;77(5):422-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1584212. Epub 2016 Jun 14.

    PubMed 27300772
  • Kageyama H, Toyooka T, Tsuzuki N, Oka K. Nonsurgical treatment of chronic subdural hematoma with tranexamic acid. J Neurosurg. 2013 Aug;119(2):332-7. doi: 10.3171/2013.3.JNS122162. Epub 2013 May 3.

    PubMed 23641825
  • Tanweer O, Frisoli FA, Bravate C, Harrison G, Pacione D, Kondziolka D, Huang PP. Tranexamic Acid for Treatment of Residual Subdural Hematoma After Bedside Twist-Drill Evacuation. World Neurosurg. 2016 Jul;91:29-33. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.03.062. Epub 2016 Mar 29.

    PubMed 27032521

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Tranexamic Acid 500Mg Tablet in people with Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic, run by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) at 1 site in Netherlands.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact William P Vandertop, MD PhD (+31205669111 ext. 63316, w.p.vandertop@amsterdamumc.nl), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

surgery for cSDH (time frame: within 12 weeks after start of treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03582293, which also lists 27 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jun 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in