AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Coronary SyndromeNCT03583411

Platelets Count Alterations in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome

An observational study of Acute Coronary Syndrome, run by Niguarda Hospital at 1 site in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Platelet count alterations (thrombocytopenia and thrombocytosis) are a common condition in patients hospitalised for acute coronary syndrome (ACS), both at disease onset and in the following recovery phase.1-3 Different factors can explain this phenomenon. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Acute Coronary Syndrome
What is being tested?
Epidemiological data collection
How many people
1,000 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
25 Jun 2018to 17 May 2019
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Subjects with Acute Coronary Syndrome diagnosis

Who may be able to join

  • All consecutive ACS subjects hospitalized in the Cardiology 1 - UTIC department of ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda between 2014 and 2017

Who cannot join

  • Age <18 years
  • Subjects admitted with ACS diagnosis but not confirmed at discharge

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • Azienda Opsedaliera Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Granda

    Milan, MI, 20162

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Platelets Count Alterations in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: Epidemiology and Prognostic Role

Platelet count alterations (thrombocytopenia and thrombocytosis) are a common condition in patients hospitalised for acute coronary syndrome (ACS), both at disease onset and in the following recovery phase.1-3 Different factors can explain this phenomenon. Thrombocytopenia could be either due to neurohormonal activation and the inflammatory process following myocardial necrosis leading to increased macrophage activation with increased clearance of platelets, or to an immuno-modulated mechanism caused by the administration of antiaggregant/anticoagulant drugs (heparin, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, P2Y12 inhibitors).

Even the invasive treatment of coronaropathy during hospitalization, with angioplasty and stent implantation procedures and/or the eventual implantation of temporary mechanical blood circulation assistant devices [aortic counterpulsation, Impella, ECMO (Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation)], could further favour the phenomenon.4 Vice versa, thrombocytosis occurring during ACS has a reactive origin, caused by increased IL-6 production which, in turn, leads to an increase in thrombopoietin formation in the liver, causing a consequent stimulatory activity on megakaryocytes.2 Different studies have demonstrated a significant correlation between platelets count disorders and patient outcome (survival during hospitalization and in the immediate follow-up).5-11 This association has, however, often been considered an epiphenomenon of the underlying pathology. Platelets count alterations are, indeed, usually consensual to other hemogram alterations (anaemia and neutropenia), an indication of a coexisting medullar insufficiency (thrombocytopenia) or other heterogenous diseases such as cancer, iron deficiency or immuno-modulated diseases, usually associated with an increase in comorbidity indexes.12 Those alterations, moreover, can usually influence changes to the therapeutic approach (reduction/suspension of recommended standard therapies) and further condition the prognosis.13 Since a few years, the investigators have been established a cardiac-haematological collaboration aiming at finding early alterations in platelets count or, more generally, in cell blood count (CBC), collegially evaluating those alterations with a cardiologist and a haematologist (even in mild cases) and scheduling, on the basis of the aforementioned evaluations, a more precise and tailored therapeutic approach toward the specific patient needs in order to minimize the downgrading of potentially life-saving therapies.14 Until now, however, no precise evaluation of the impact that this strategy had in influencing the therapeutic approach and in improving patient outcome in our population has been performed.

A retrospective evaluation of consecutive ACS patients, their clinical, biohumoral and procedural characteristics and the adopted pharmacological treatments is, therefore, an important epidemiologic tool for the characterization of this phenomenon and for identifying potential associations which could suggest possible future therapeutic developments.

Read the detailed description

Even the invasive treatment of coronaropathy during hospitalization, with angioplasty and stent implantation procedures and/or the eventual implantation of temporary mechanical blood circulation assistant devices [aortic counterpulsation, Impella, ECMO (Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation)], could further favour the phenomenon. Vice versa, thrombocytosis occurring during ACS has a reactive origin, caused by increased IL-6 production which, in turn, leads to an increase in thrombopoietin formation in the liver, causing a consequent stimulatory activity on megakaryocytes. Different studies have demonstrated a significant correlation between platelets count disorders and patient outcome (survival during hospitalization and in the immediate follow-up). This association has, however, often been considered an epiphenomenon of the underlying pathology. Platelets count alterations are, indeed, usually consensual to other hemogram alterations (anaemia and neutropenia), an indication of a coexisting medullar insufficiency (thrombocytopenia) or other heterogenous diseases such as cancer, iron deficiency or immuno-modulated diseases, usually associated with an increase in comorbidity indexes. Those alterations, moreover, can usually influence changes to the therapeutic approach (reduction/suspension of recommended standard therapies) and further condition the prognosis. Since a few years,the investigators have been established a cardiac-haematological collaboration aiming at finding early alterations in platelets count or, more generally, in cell blood count (CBC), collegially evaluating those alterations with a cardiologist and a haematologist (even in mild cases) and scheduling, on the basis of the aforementioned evaluations, a more precise and tailored therapeutic approach toward the specific patient needs in order to minimize the downgrading of potentially life-saving therapies. Until now, however, no precise evaluation of the impact that this strategy had in influencing the therapeutic approach and in improving patient outcome in our population has been performed.

A retrospective evaluation of consecutive ACS patients, their clinical, biohumoral and procedural characteristics and the adopted pharmacological treatments is, therefore, an important epidemiologic tool for the characterization of this phenomenon and for identifying potential associations which could suggest possible future therapeutic developments.

Being tested
Epidemiological data collection
Keywords
thrombocytopenia, thrombocytosis
Medical subject headings
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Thrombocytopenia, Thrombocytosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Epidemiological data collectionOther

    To profile each subject enrolled in the study, anamnesis and different personal, clinical, procedural, pharmacological and follow up related variables will be collected. Data collection, maintenance and analysis will be performed using a database that will be developed, managed and updated by study promoter, in accordance with Good Clinical Practice (GCP)

Study groups in NCT03583411
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patientsACS subjects hospitalized in the Cardiology 1 - UTIC department of ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda between 2014 and 2017
Receives: Other: Epidemiological data collection

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. net adverse clinical events NACE

    the composite of a list of clinical events

    Measured: 2014 to 2017

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. death

    patient's death for all causes at follow up

    Measured: 2014 to 2017

  2. hospitalization

    duration of patient's hospitalization

    Measured: 2014 to 2017

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Jul 2018
  2. Study start25 Jun 2018
  3. Primary completion28 Feb 2019
  4. Study completion17 May 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
1,000 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03583411
Sponsor's protocol ID
S_23_10_17_2001
Status last verified
May 2019
First submitted
28 Jun 2018
Last updated
21 May 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: Undecided yet

Publications

  • Morici N, Tavecchia GA, Antolini L, Caporale MR, Cantoni S, Bertuccio P, Sacco A, Meani P, Viola G, Brunelli D, Oliva F, Lombardi F, Segreto A, Oreglia JA, La Vecchia C, Cattaneo M, Valgimigli M, Savonitto S. Use of PRECISE-DAPT Score and Admission Platelet Count to Predict Mortality Risk in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome. Angiology. 2019 Oct;70(9):867-877. doi: 10.1177/0003319719848547. Epub 2019 May 14.

    PubMed 31088127

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Acute Coronary Syndrome, run by Niguarda Hospital at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

net adverse clinical events NACE (time frame: 2014 to 2017). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03583411, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 May 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in