SpondylodiskitisNCT03585699
Percutaneous Fluoroscopic vs CT Guided Core Needle Biopsy for Spinal Infection and Tumor
A study testing Fluoroscopy Guided Spinal Biopsy and CT guided Spinal Biopsy in people with Spondylodiskitis and Spinal Tumor, run by University of Malaya at 1 site in Malaysia.
Trial summary
Spinal biopsy is important to obtain culture and histopathological diagnosis in spine infection and tumors. To date, there is no prospective randomized study comparing both techniques. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Spondylodiskitis, Spinal Tumor
- What is being tested?
- Fluoroscopy Guided Spinal Biopsy and CT guided Spinal Biopsy
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteMalaysia
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2016to 2 Jun 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age more than 18;
- Patients who presented with clinical symptoms and radiological features suggestive of infection or malignancy;
- MRI reported as probable infection or tumour.
Who cannot join
- Cervical spine lesion;
- Significant neurological deficit that required urgent surgery;
- Partially treated spinal infections;
- Vascular tumour;
- Infection over skin puncture site;
- Pregnancy;
- Bleeding diathesis;
- Medically unfit for spinal biopsy.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Accuracy, Safety and Diagnostic Outcome of Percutaneous Fluoroscopic vs. CT Guided Transpedicular Core Needle Biopsy for Spinal Infections and Tumors. A Prospective Randomized Trial
Spinal biopsy is important to obtain culture and histopathological diagnosis in spine infection and tumors. To date, there is no prospective randomized study comparing both techniques. Therefore, the aim of this prospective randomized trial was to evaluate the accuracy, safety and diagnostic outcome of both these techniques.A prospective randomized trial was performed in 60 patients divided equally into fluoroscopic and CT guided spinal biopsy groups. Transpedicular approach was done with 8G core biopsy needle. Specimens were sent for histopathological examinations and cultures. Diagnosis were made based on biopsy results, clinical criteria and disease progression during 6 months follow up. Radiation expose to patients and doctors were measured with optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs).
Read the detailed description
This prospective randomized study was carried out in a single institution from November 2016 to June 2018.
Patients were recruited by three spine surgeons from the same institution after eligibility assessment. Sixty consecutive patients were randomized equally into fluoroscopic and CT guided spinal biopsy groups. Randomization procedure was performed using a computer generated random number sequence on www.random.org. Separate individuals completed the random allocation sequence, patient enrollment and outcome assessment. Outcome assessors were blinded to group assignment.
Data collection Clinical data collected were: patient demographics, comorbidities, infective parameters, tumor markers, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) findings and pre-biopsy pain score at rest using visual analogue scale (VAS). Intraoperative data included radiation exposure dosage, biopsy duration and complications encountered. Following biopsy, we recorded the biopsy result, 6-hourly pain score (VAS) at for 48 hours, additional analgesia requirement and complications.
Radiation measurement Commercial optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters, OSLDs (NanoDotTM Dosimeter, Landauer Inc, Glenwood, IL) were used to measure radiation dose. Ten OSLDs were placed on patients and doctors prior to all biopsies over selective areas representing radiosensitive organs. Placements of the OSLDs were done by a single observer. OSLDs were processed using MicroStar OSLD reader system (Landauer, Inc. Glenwood, IL). Each OSLD was processed 3 times during each reading to obtain a mean value to minimize error. The absorbed doses were measured in centigrays (cGy). Bleaching/zeroing of the OSLDs were done using optical annealing system containing fluorescent lamps (Osram lumilux, 24 W, 280 ~780 nm) in between each use of OSLDs.
Biopsy technique Transpedicular approach with an 8-gauge T-Lok™ bone marrow biopsy needle (Argon Medical Devices, Athens, TX, USA) was used in both arms. 10cc 2% lignocaine was infiltrated prior to biopsy. Biopsy needle was tapped gently with mallet through the pedicle and into the lesion under imaging guidance. Trocar was then withdrawn once it reached the affected area. The cannula was rotated several times to disengage sample from surrounding tissue. Then, aspiration of samples was done using 10-ml syringe prior to retraction of the cannula. Tissue samples were retrieved from the cannula with the use of stylet.
Samples collected were sent to laboratories for histopathological examination (HPE), culture and sensitivity (bacteriology, mycology and acid-fast bacilli), staining (Gram and Ziehl-Neelsen) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
- Fluoroscopy Guided Spinal Biopsy Arm: Fluoroscopy guided spinal biopsies were done by spine surgeons in the operation theatre using C-Arm fluoroscopy device (OECFluorostar7900Compact - GE®). C-arm image intensifier was positioned until fluoroscopic beam was collinear with the corresponding vertebral body on AP view prior to insertion of biopsy needle.
- CT guided Spinal Biopsy Arm: CT guided spinal biopsies were done by radiologist under guidance of 128-slice CT scanner (SOMATOM Definition AS+, Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.). Preliminary axial CT scanning was done in bone window (window width, WW:2500; window level, WL:500) at the pre-selected levels decided from previous imaging to plan the needle access. Biopsy was then performed under sequential CT-fluoroscopy scan.
Post biopsy care Antimicrobials were commenced upon completion of biopsy for patients who were diagnosed to have spine infection. Disease progression was assessed based on clinical symptoms, ESR, CRP and/or MRI repeated during 6 months follow up for patients who were not treated for spinal infection.
For suspected spinal tumor cases, negative biopsies that were reported to have inadequate sample, were repeated with the other method or other investigation modalities will be resorted accordingly. Patients with negative biopsy that was reported to have adequate sample were follow up for 6 months for disease progression.
Sample size Sample size was determined based on accuracy of biopsy as outcome variable, in which the accuracy rate was 0.89. It was estimated using G*Power software (version 3.1.9.2) based on 2 proportions formula (Fisher's exact test). With alpha level of 0.05, 95% confidence interval and power of study 0.8, a minimum number of 52 patients (26 patients for each arm) was required for this study.
Statistical analysis Data were analyzed with SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL (SPSS v 23). Continuous data were reported as mean ± standard deviation and compared using t test. Chi-squared testing was used for between-groups comparisons. Fisher-exact test was used for the comparison of diagnostic accuracy between fluoroscopic and CT guided spinal biopsy. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant.
- Conditions
- Spondylodiskitis, Spinal Tumor
- Being tested
- Fluoroscopy Guided Spinal Biopsy, CT guided Spinal Biopsy
- Keywords
- spinal biopsy, prospective randomizd trial
- Medical subject headings
- Discitis, Spinal Cord Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Fluoroscopy Guided Spinal BiopsyDiagnostic test
Spinal biopsy done via Transpedicular approach with an 8-gauge T-Lok™ bone marrow biopsy needle under fluoroscopic guidance.
Samples collected were sent to laboratories for histopathological examination (HPE), culture and sensitivity (bacteriology, mycology and acid-fast bacilli), staining (Gram and Ziehl-Neelsen) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
CT guided Spinal BiopsyDiagnostic test
Spinal biopsy done via Transpedicular approach with an 8-gauge T-Lok™ bone marrow biopsy needle under CT guidance.
Samples collected were sent to laboratories for histopathological examination (HPE), culture and sensitivity (bacteriology, mycology and acid-fast bacilli), staining (Gram and Ziehl-Neelsen) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Fluoroscopy Guided Spinal Biopsy Arm | Active comparator | Fluoroscopy guided spinal biopsies were done by spine surgeons in the operation theatre using C-Arm fluoroscopy device (OECFluorostar7900Compact - GE®). C-arm image intensifier was positioned until fluoroscopic beam was collinear with the corresponding vertebral body on AP view prior to insertion of biopsy needle Receives: Diagnostic Test: Fluoroscopy Guided Spinal Biopsy |
| CT guided Spinal Biopsy Arm | Active comparator | CT guided spinal biopsies were done by radiologist under guidance of 128-slice CT scanner (SOMATOM Definition AS+, Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.). Preliminary axial CT scanning was done in bone window (window width, WW:2500; window level, WL:500) at the pre-selected levels decided from previous imaging to plan the needle access. Biopsy was then performed under sequential CT-fluoroscopy scan. Receives: Diagnostic Test: CT guided Spinal Biopsy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Diagnostic accuracy of fluoroscopic and CT guided spinal biopsy
Diagnostic accuracy were determined based on true positive, true negative, false positive and false negative biopsy findings
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
Radiation expose to patients and doctors
Total of 10 commercial optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs) were placed on patients and doctors at different body areas prior to biopsy to measure radiation dose
Measured: During biopsy
Pre biopsy and post biopsy pain score assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS)
Pre biopsy pain score and post biopsy pain score (6-hourly for 48 hours) were assessed base on visual analogue scale (VAS) and recorded. Pain score will be aggregated by mean and standard deviation and compared between both groups. Additional analgesia requirement was documented.
Measured: 48 hours post biopsy
Complications of spinal biopsy
Complications of spinal biopsy were observed such as neurovascular injury and iatrogenic fracture.
Measured: During and 48 hours after spinal biopsy
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Jul 2018
- Study start1 Nov 2016
- Primary completion2 Jun 2018
- Study completion2 Jun 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for SpondylodiskitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Malaya
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr Lee She Ann, University of Malaya
- Investigators
- Chris Yin Wei Chan, Study director, University of Malaya
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03585699
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NMRR-16-690-30761
- Status last verified
- Jul 2018
- First submitted
- 29 Jun 2018
- Last updated
- 19 Jul 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Jul 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Accuracy, Safety and Diagnostic Outcome of Percutaneous Fluoroscopic vs. CT Guided Transpedicular Core Needle Biopsy for Spinal Infections and Tumors. A Prospective Randomized Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03585699
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NMRR-16-690-30761
- Conditions
- Spondylodiskitis, Spinal Tumor
- Keywords
- spinal biopsy, prospective randomizd trial
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of MalayaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 2 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 2 Jun 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Spinal biopsy is important to obtain culture and histopathological diagnosis in spine infection and tumors. To date, there is no prospective randomized study comparing both techniques. Therefore, the aim of this prospective randomized trial was to evaluate the accuracy, safety and diagnostic outcome of both these techniques.A prospective randomized trial was performed in 60 patients divided equally into fluoroscopic and CT guided spinal biopsy groups. Transpedicular approach was done with 8G core biopsy needle. Specimens were sent for histopathological examinations and cultures. Diagnosis were made based on biopsy results, clinical criteria and disease progression during 6 months follow up. Radiation expose to patients and doctors were measured with optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs).
Detailed description
This prospective randomized study was carried out in a single institution from November 2016 to June 2018.
Patients were recruited by three spine surgeons from the same institution after eligibility assessment. Sixty consecutive patients were randomized equally into fluoroscopic and CT guided spinal biopsy groups. Randomization procedure was performed using a computer generated random number sequence on www.random.org. Separate individuals completed the random allocation sequence, patient enrollment and outcome assessment. Outcome assessors were blinded to group assignment.
Data collection Clinical data collected were: patient demographics, comorbidities, infective parameters, tumor markers, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) findings and pre-biopsy pain score at rest using visual analogue scale (VAS). Intraoperative data included radiation exposure dosage, biopsy duration and complications encountered. Following biopsy, we recorded the biopsy result, 6-hourly pain score (VAS) at for 48 hours, additional analgesia requirement and complications.
Radiation measurement Commercial optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters, OSLDs (NanoDotTM Dosimeter, Landauer Inc, Glenwood, IL) were used to measure radiation dose. Ten OSLDs were placed on patients and doctors prior to all biopsies over selective areas representing radiosensitive organs. Placements of the OSLDs were done by a single observer. OSLDs were processed using MicroStar OSLD reader system (Landauer, Inc. Glenwood, IL). Each OSLD was processed 3 times during each reading to obtain a mean value to minimize error. The absorbed doses were measured in centigrays (cGy). Bleaching/zeroing of the OSLDs were done using optical annealing system containing fluorescent lamps (Osram lumilux, 24 W, 280 ~780 nm) in between each use of OSLDs.
Biopsy technique Transpedicular approach with an 8-gauge T-Lok™ bone marrow biopsy needle (Argon Medical Devices, Athens, TX, USA) was used in both arms. 10cc 2% lignocaine was infiltrated prior to biopsy. Biopsy needle was tapped gently with mallet through the pedicle and into the lesion under imaging guidance. Trocar was then withdrawn once it reached the affected area. The cannula was rotated several times to disengage sample from surrounding tissue. Then, aspiration of samples was done using 10-ml syringe prior to retraction of the cannula. Tissue samples were retrieved from the cannula with the use of stylet.
Samples collected were sent to laboratories for histopathological examination (HPE), culture and sensitivity (bacteriology, mycology and acid-fast bacilli), staining (Gram and Ziehl-Neelsen) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
- Fluoroscopy Guided Spinal Biopsy Arm: Fluoroscopy guided spinal biopsies were done by spine surgeons in the operation theatre using C-Arm fluoroscopy device (OECFluorostar7900Compact - GE®). C-arm image intensifier was positioned until fluoroscopic beam was collinear with the corresponding vertebral body on AP view prior to insertion of biopsy needle.
- CT guided Spinal Biopsy Arm: CT guided spinal biopsies were done by radiologist under guidance of 128-slice CT scanner (SOMATOM Definition AS+, Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.). Preliminary axial CT scanning was done in bone window (window width, WW:2500; window level, WL:500) at the pre-selected levels decided from previous imaging to plan the needle access. Biopsy was then performed under sequential CT-fluoroscopy scan.
Post biopsy care Antimicrobials were commenced upon completion of biopsy for patients who were diagnosed to have spine infection. Disease progression was assessed based on clinical symptoms, ESR, CRP and/or MRI repeated during 6 months follow up for patients who were not treated for spinal infection.
For suspected spinal tumor cases, negative biopsies that were reported to have inadequate sample, were repeated with the other method or other investigation modalities will be resorted accordingly. Patients with negative biopsy that was reported to have adequate sample were follow up for 6 months for disease progression.
Sample size Sample size was determined based on accuracy of biopsy as outcome variable, in which the accuracy rate was 0.89. It was estimated using G*Power software (version 3.1.9.2) based on 2 proportions formula (Fisher's exact test). With alpha level of 0.05, 95% confidence interval and power of study 0.8, a minimum number of 52 patients (26 patients for each arm) was required for this study.
Statistical analysis Data were analyzed with SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL (SPSS v 23). Continuous data were reported as mean ± standard deviation and compared using t test. Chi-squared testing was used for between-groups comparisons. Fisher-exact test was used for the comparison of diagnostic accuracy between fluoroscopic and CT guided spinal biopsy. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Fluoroscopy Guided Spinal Biopsy Arm | Active comparator | Diagnostic Test: Fluoroscopy Guided Spinal BiopsyFluoroscopy guided spinal biopsies were done by spine surgeons in the operation theatre using C-Arm fluoroscopy device (OECFluorostar7900Compact - GE®). C-arm image intensifier was positioned until fluoroscopic beam was collinear with the corresponding vertebral body on AP view prior to insertion of biopsy needle |
| CT guided Spinal Biopsy Arm | Active comparator | Diagnostic Test: CT guided Spinal BiopsyCT guided spinal biopsies were done by radiologist under guidance of 128-slice CT scanner (SOMATOM Definition AS+, Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.). Preliminary axial CT scanning was done in bone window (window width, WW:2500; window level, WL:500) at the pre-selected levels decided from previous imaging to plan the needle access. Biopsy was then performed under sequential CT-fluoroscopy scan. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age more than 18;
- Patients who presented with clinical symptoms and radiological features suggestive of infection or malignancy;
- MRI reported as probable infection or tumour.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Cervical spine lesion;
- Significant neurological deficit that required urgent surgery;
- Partially treated spinal infections;
- Vascular tumour;
- Infection over skin puncture site;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Fluoroscopy Guided Spinal BiopsySpinal biopsy done via Transpedicular approach with an 8-gauge T-Lok™ bone marrow biopsy needle under fluoroscopic guidance. Samples collected were sent to laboratories for histopathological examination (HPE), culture and sensitivity (bacteriology, mycology and acid-fast bacilli), staining (Gram and Ziehl-Neelsen) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. | Diagnostic test | Fluoroscopy Guided Spinal Biopsy Arm |
| CT guided Spinal BiopsySpinal biopsy done via Transpedicular approach with an 8-gauge T-Lok™ bone marrow biopsy needle under CT guidance. Samples collected were sent to laboratories for histopathological examination (HPE), culture and sensitivity (bacteriology, mycology and acid-fast bacilli), staining (Gram and Ziehl-Neelsen) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. | Diagnostic test | CT guided Spinal Biopsy Arm |
Primary outcome
Diagnostic accuracy of fluoroscopic and CT guided spinal biopsy
Time frame: 6 months
Diagnostic accuracy were determined based on true positive, true negative, false positive and false negative biopsy findings
3 secondary outcomes
Radiation expose to patients and doctors
Time frame: During biopsy
Pre biopsy and post biopsy pain score assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time frame: 48 hours post biopsy
Complications of spinal biopsy
Time frame: During and 48 hours after spinal biopsy
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Jul 2018.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Spondylodiskitis
Recruiting
Parascapular Sub Iliocostalis Plane Block Versus Thoracic Paravertebral Plane Block for Traumatic Multiple Rib Fractures
Discitis of Thoracic Region
Not yet recruitingObservational study
One Year Results of Managing Primary Spondylodiscitis
Primary Spondylodiscitis, Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Spondylodiscitis: a Retrospective Observational Study.
Spondylodiscitis
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Prolonged Bed Rest Versus Early Raising in Vertebral Osteomyelitis
Infectious; Spondylitis
RecruitingObservational study
Gene Expression Profiles in Spinal Tuberculosis.
Tuberculosis, Spinal, Tuberculosis, Osteoarticular
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Chris Yin Wei Chan study director
University of Malaya
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Fluoroscopy Guided Spinal Biopsy and CT guided Spinal Biopsy in people with Spondylodiskitis and Spinal Tumor, run by University of Malaya at 1 site in Malaysia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Malaysia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Diagnostic accuracy of fluoroscopic and CT guided spinal biopsy (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Jul 2018.