AzTrials
AzTrials

SpondylodiskitisNCT03585699

Percutaneous Fluoroscopic vs CT Guided Core Needle Biopsy for Spinal Infection and Tumor

A study testing Fluoroscopy Guided Spinal Biopsy and CT guided Spinal Biopsy in people with Spondylodiskitis and Spinal Tumor, run by University of Malaya at 1 site in Malaysia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Spinal biopsy is important to obtain culture and histopathological diagnosis in spine infection and tumors. To date, there is no prospective randomized study comparing both techniques. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Spondylodiskitis, Spinal Tumor
What is being tested?
Fluoroscopy Guided Spinal Biopsy and CT guided Spinal Biopsy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteMalaysia
Study dates
1 Nov 2016to 2 Jun 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age more than 18;
  • Patients who presented with clinical symptoms and radiological features suggestive of infection or malignancy;
  • MRI reported as probable infection or tumour.

Who cannot join

  • Cervical spine lesion;
  • Significant neurological deficit that required urgent surgery;
  • Partially treated spinal infections;
  • Vascular tumour;
  • Infection over skin puncture site;
  • Pregnancy;
  • Bleeding diathesis;
  • Medically unfit for spinal biopsy.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Malaysia1 site
  • University Malaya Medical Center

    Kuala Lumpur, 59100

Other trials in Malaysia

About this study

Official title: Accuracy, Safety and Diagnostic Outcome of Percutaneous Fluoroscopic vs. CT Guided Transpedicular Core Needle Biopsy for Spinal Infections and Tumors. A Prospective Randomized Trial

Spinal biopsy is important to obtain culture and histopathological diagnosis in spine infection and tumors. To date, there is no prospective randomized study comparing both techniques. Therefore, the aim of this prospective randomized trial was to evaluate the accuracy, safety and diagnostic outcome of both these techniques.A prospective randomized trial was performed in 60 patients divided equally into fluoroscopic and CT guided spinal biopsy groups. Transpedicular approach was done with 8G core biopsy needle. Specimens were sent for histopathological examinations and cultures. Diagnosis were made based on biopsy results, clinical criteria and disease progression during 6 months follow up. Radiation expose to patients and doctors were measured with optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs).

Read the detailed description

This prospective randomized study was carried out in a single institution from November 2016 to June 2018.

Patients were recruited by three spine surgeons from the same institution after eligibility assessment. Sixty consecutive patients were randomized equally into fluoroscopic and CT guided spinal biopsy groups. Randomization procedure was performed using a computer generated random number sequence on www.random.org. Separate individuals completed the random allocation sequence, patient enrollment and outcome assessment. Outcome assessors were blinded to group assignment.

Data collection Clinical data collected were: patient demographics, comorbidities, infective parameters, tumor markers, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) findings and pre-biopsy pain score at rest using visual analogue scale (VAS). Intraoperative data included radiation exposure dosage, biopsy duration and complications encountered. Following biopsy, we recorded the biopsy result, 6-hourly pain score (VAS) at for 48 hours, additional analgesia requirement and complications.

Radiation measurement Commercial optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters, OSLDs (NanoDotTM Dosimeter, Landauer Inc, Glenwood, IL) were used to measure radiation dose. Ten OSLDs were placed on patients and doctors prior to all biopsies over selective areas representing radiosensitive organs. Placements of the OSLDs were done by a single observer. OSLDs were processed using MicroStar OSLD reader system (Landauer, Inc. Glenwood, IL). Each OSLD was processed 3 times during each reading to obtain a mean value to minimize error. The absorbed doses were measured in centigrays (cGy). Bleaching/zeroing of the OSLDs were done using optical annealing system containing fluorescent lamps (Osram lumilux, 24 W, 280 ~780 nm) in between each use of OSLDs.

Biopsy technique Transpedicular approach with an 8-gauge T-Lok™ bone marrow biopsy needle (Argon Medical Devices, Athens, TX, USA) was used in both arms. 10cc 2% lignocaine was infiltrated prior to biopsy. Biopsy needle was tapped gently with mallet through the pedicle and into the lesion under imaging guidance. Trocar was then withdrawn once it reached the affected area. The cannula was rotated several times to disengage sample from surrounding tissue. Then, aspiration of samples was done using 10-ml syringe prior to retraction of the cannula. Tissue samples were retrieved from the cannula with the use of stylet.

Samples collected were sent to laboratories for histopathological examination (HPE), culture and sensitivity (bacteriology, mycology and acid-fast bacilli), staining (Gram and Ziehl-Neelsen) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

  1. Fluoroscopy Guided Spinal Biopsy Arm: Fluoroscopy guided spinal biopsies were done by spine surgeons in the operation theatre using C-Arm fluoroscopy device (OECFluorostar7900Compact - GE®). C-arm image intensifier was positioned until fluoroscopic beam was collinear with the corresponding vertebral body on AP view prior to insertion of biopsy needle.
  2. CT guided Spinal Biopsy Arm: CT guided spinal biopsies were done by radiologist under guidance of 128-slice CT scanner (SOMATOM Definition AS+, Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.). Preliminary axial CT scanning was done in bone window (window width, WW:2500; window level, WL:500) at the pre-selected levels decided from previous imaging to plan the needle access. Biopsy was then performed under sequential CT-fluoroscopy scan.

Post biopsy care Antimicrobials were commenced upon completion of biopsy for patients who were diagnosed to have spine infection. Disease progression was assessed based on clinical symptoms, ESR, CRP and/or MRI repeated during 6 months follow up for patients who were not treated for spinal infection.

For suspected spinal tumor cases, negative biopsies that were reported to have inadequate sample, were repeated with the other method or other investigation modalities will be resorted accordingly. Patients with negative biopsy that was reported to have adequate sample were follow up for 6 months for disease progression.

Sample size Sample size was determined based on accuracy of biopsy as outcome variable, in which the accuracy rate was 0.89. It was estimated using G*Power software (version 3.1.9.2) based on 2 proportions formula (Fisher's exact test). With alpha level of 0.05, 95% confidence interval and power of study 0.8, a minimum number of 52 patients (26 patients for each arm) was required for this study.

Statistical analysis Data were analyzed with SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL (SPSS v 23). Continuous data were reported as mean ± standard deviation and compared using t test. Chi-squared testing was used for between-groups comparisons. Fisher-exact test was used for the comparison of diagnostic accuracy between fluoroscopic and CT guided spinal biopsy. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Being tested
Fluoroscopy Guided Spinal Biopsy, CT guided Spinal Biopsy
Keywords
spinal biopsy, prospective randomizd trial
Medical subject headings
Discitis, Spinal Cord Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Fluoroscopy Guided Spinal BiopsyDiagnostic test

    Spinal biopsy done via Transpedicular approach with an 8-gauge T-Lok™ bone marrow biopsy needle under fluoroscopic guidance.

    Samples collected were sent to laboratories for histopathological examination (HPE), culture and sensitivity (bacteriology, mycology and acid-fast bacilli), staining (Gram and Ziehl-Neelsen) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

  • CT guided Spinal BiopsyDiagnostic test

    Spinal biopsy done via Transpedicular approach with an 8-gauge T-Lok™ bone marrow biopsy needle under CT guidance.

    Samples collected were sent to laboratories for histopathological examination (HPE), culture and sensitivity (bacteriology, mycology and acid-fast bacilli), staining (Gram and Ziehl-Neelsen) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Study groups in NCT03585699
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Fluoroscopy Guided Spinal Biopsy ArmActive comparatorFluoroscopy guided spinal biopsies were done by spine surgeons in the operation theatre using C-Arm fluoroscopy device (OECFluorostar7900Compact - GE®). C-arm image intensifier was positioned until fluoroscopic beam was collinear with the corresponding vertebral body on AP view prior to insertion of biopsy needle
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Fluoroscopy Guided Spinal Biopsy
CT guided Spinal Biopsy ArmActive comparatorCT guided spinal biopsies were done by radiologist under guidance of 128-slice CT scanner (SOMATOM Definition AS+, Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.). Preliminary axial CT scanning was done in bone window (window width, WW:2500; window level, WL:500) at the pre-selected levels decided from previous imaging to plan the needle access. Biopsy was then performed under sequential CT-fluoroscopy scan.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: CT guided Spinal Biopsy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Diagnostic accuracy of fluoroscopic and CT guided spinal biopsy

    Diagnostic accuracy were determined based on true positive, true negative, false positive and false negative biopsy findings

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Radiation expose to patients and doctors

    Total of 10 commercial optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs) were placed on patients and doctors at different body areas prior to biopsy to measure radiation dose

    Measured: During biopsy

  2. Pre biopsy and post biopsy pain score assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS)

    Pre biopsy pain score and post biopsy pain score (6-hourly for 48 hours) were assessed base on visual analogue scale (VAS) and recorded. Pain score will be aggregated by mean and standard deviation and compared between both groups. Additional analgesia requirement was documented.

    Measured: 48 hours post biopsy

  3. Complications of spinal biopsy

    Complications of spinal biopsy were observed such as neurovascular injury and iatrogenic fracture.

    Measured: During and 48 hours after spinal biopsy

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Jul 2018
  2. Study start1 Nov 2016
  3. Primary completion2 Jun 2018
  4. Study completion2 Jun 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03585699
Sponsor's protocol ID
NMRR-16-690-30761
Status last verified
Jul 2018
First submitted
29 Jun 2018
Last updated
19 Jul 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Fluoroscopy Guided Spinal Biopsy and CT guided Spinal Biopsy in people with Spondylodiskitis and Spinal Tumor, run by University of Malaya at 1 site in Malaysia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Malaysia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Diagnostic accuracy of fluoroscopic and CT guided spinal biopsy (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Jul 2018.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in