AzTrials
AzTrials

Carcinoma, HepatocellularNCT03586050

Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Microwave Ablation in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Korea

A study testing Microwave ablation in people with Carcinoma, Hepatocellular and Hepatocellular Carcinoma, run by Ethicon, Inc. at 1 site in South Korea.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a single arm, non-randomized, single center study to evaluate ablation, oncologic outcomes and safety in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 19 years and older
What is being tested?
Microwave ablation
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
33 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
11 Dec 2017to 11 May 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 19 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Confirmed hepatocellular carcinoma, tumor size of more than 2 cm and up to 5cm, single location, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Stage A based on imaging and biopsy confirmation
  • Primary hepatocellular carcinoma or recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma which was previously treated with ablation or surgical resection only;
  • Scheduled for microwave ablation of the liver;
  • Performance status 0-1 (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group classification);
  • Functional hepatic reserve based on the Child-Pugh score (Class A or B);
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score < 3;
  • Given voluntary, written informed consent to participate in this study and has authorized the transfer of his/her information to the Sponsor, and willing to comply with study-related evaluation and treatment schedule;
  • At least 19 years of age

Who cannot join

  • Active bacterial infection or fungal infection;
  • Systemic administration of steroids, including herbal supplements that contain steroids, within 30 days prior to the study procedure;
  • Chemotherapy or radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma may not be performed for 30 days prior to the study procedure;
  • Subject with implantable pacemakers or other electronic implants;
  • Planned/ scheduled liver surgery.
  • Subject with a platelet count of less than 20,000/mm3;
Show all 14Show fewer
  • Subject with an INR greater than 1.5;
  • Subject with renal failure on renal dialysis;
  • Scheduled concurrent procedure other than microwave ablation in the liver;
  • Pregnant or lactating;
  • Physical or psychological condition which would impair study participation;
  • Participation in any other clinical study concurrently or within the last 3 months;
  • The subject is judged unsuitable for study participation by the Investigator for any other reason;
  • Unable or unwilling to attend follow-up visits and examinations.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Korea1 site
  • Samsung Medical Center

    Seoul

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Microwave Ablation in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Korea

This is a single arm, non-randomized, single center study to evaluate ablation, oncologic outcomes and safety in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Read the detailed description

This prospective, single-arm single center study will provide clinical data for the Neuwave Medical Microwave Ablation System and accessories.

Individuals who undergo microwave ablation of liver tumors who meet study entry criteria, will be enrolled.

The enrollment for the study will continue until 30 eligible subjects complete the 3-month visit after ablation for the primary effectiveness and safety analysis.

The subjects will be followed for approximately up to 36 months after the ablation procedure for safety, oncologic and ablation outcomes.

Being tested
Microwave ablation
Keywords
Hepatocellular Carcinoma; liver cancer; cancer; liver
Medical subject headings
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Liver Neoplasms, Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Microwave ablationDevice

    All patients will receive microwave ablation using the NeuWave Microwave Ablation System and Accessories

Study groups in NCT03586050
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Microwave AblationExperimentalAll patients will receive microwave ablation using the NeuWave Microwave Ablation System and Accessories
Receives: Device: Microwave ablation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants Whose Ablation Resulted in Technical Success

    Number of participants whose ablation resulted in technical success were reported. Technical success was defined as complete tumor ablation with adequate or insufficient margin, based on contrast-enhanced Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and Computed scans immediately following the ablation procedure on Day 0 evaluated by the independent reviewer and principle investigator (PI) based on the response to the question "Confirm outcome of ablation".

    Measured: Post ablation procedure (Day 0) up to 4 days

Secondary outcomes (16)
  1. Number of Participants Whose Ablation Resulted in Primary Technique Efficacy

    Number of participants whose ablation resulted in primary technique efficacy were reported. Primary technique efficacy was defined as a complete tumor ablation with adequate or insufficient ablation margin, based on contrast-enhanced MRI and CT scans follow-up at 1 month after the ablation procedure, evaluated by the independent reviewer and PI based on the response to the question "Confirm outcome of ablation". The primary technique efficacy was achieved if responses were either "Complete tumor ablation with adequate margin" or "Complete tumor ablation with insufficient margin".

    Measured: At 1 month after the ablation procedure on Day 0

  2. Percentage of Participants With Local Tumor Progression (LTP)

    Percentage of participants with LTP were reported. The first LTP rate was defined as one minus primary efficacy rate. Primary efficacy rate was defined as percentage of participants with target tumors successfully eradicated following the ablation procedure and measured at each follow-up visit post-ablation. Primary efficacy was achieved when any target tumor had been successfully ablated at the Visit 2 ablation (Technical success achieved) and had no evidence of local tumor progression (LTP) based on the independent reviewer's assessment and PI assessment.

    Measured: At 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months post ablation on Day 0

  3. Percentage of Participants With Primary Efficacy

    Percentage of participants with primary efficacy based on the independent reviewer and PI assessment were reported. Primary efficacy rate was defined as percentage of participants with target tumors successfully eradicated following the ablation procedure and measured at each follow-up visit post-ablation. Primary efficacy was achieved when any target tumor had been successfully ablated at the Visit 2 ablation (Technical success achieved) and had no evidence of LTP based on the independent reviewer's assessment and PI assessment.

    Measured: At 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months post ablation on Day 0

  4. Percentage of Participants With Secondary Efficacy

    Percentage of participants with secondary efficacy based on the independent reviewer and PI assessment were reported. Secondary efficacy rate was defined as percentage of participants with target tumors that had undergone successful repeat ablation following identification of local tumor progression.

    Measured: From time of first ablation (Day 0) up to 36 months

  5. Progression Free Survival (PFS) Rate

    PFS rate was defined as the percentage of participants with PFS. PFS was defined as the time from the first ablation until LTP (first LTP rate was defined as one minus primary efficacy rate), any identification of a new (nontarget) lesion/tumor during follow-up, or death due to any cause (whichever occurs first). PFS rate based on independent reviewer's assessment and PI assessment was reported.

    Measured: At 36 months after the ablation procedure on Day 0

  6. Overall Survival (OS) Rate

    OS rate was defined as the percentage of participants with OS. OS was defined as the time from the first ablation until death due to any cause.

    Measured: At 36 months after the ablation procedure on Day 0

  7. Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Within 3 Months Post Ablation

    Percentage of participants with AEs within 3 months post ablation were reported. An AE was an untoward medical occurrence (sign, symptom or disease) in a participant, and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the study medical device.

    Measured: From time of first ablation (Day 0) up to 3 months post ablation

  8. Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events Within 36 Months Post Ablation

    Percentage of participants with AEs within 36 months post ablation were reported. An AE was an untoward medical occurrence (sign, symptom or disease) in a participant, and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the study medical device.

    Measured: From time of first ablation (Day 0) up to 36 months post ablation

  9. Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score

    Change from baseline in VAS pain scores were reported. VAS pain score was a self-reported pain score on a 100 millimeter (mm) scale which ranged from ranged from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (severe pain). Higher score indicated severe pain. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to date of first microwave ablation (including unscheduled assessments) or on the date of first microwave ablation but prior to the time of first probe placement.

    Measured: Baseline (Pre-Ablation), Day 0 (post ablation), Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 (post ablation on Day 0)

  10. Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30 Scale Score

    Change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 scale score were reported. EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 questions for assessing overall health in cancer patients. The questions reflect how patients felt during the past week and are scored 1-4 (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much) except for the last two questions, which are scored on a 7-point Likert Scale from 1-7 (1=very poor to 7=excellent). All the questions were transformed to a 0-100 scale and summed for an overall quality of life score, with a high score representing higher quality of life. Baseline: last non-missing measurement prior to date of first microwave ablation or on date of first microwave ablation but prior to time of first probe placement.

    Measured: Baseline (Pre-Ablation), Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 (post ablation on Day 0)

  11. Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ HCC 18 Scale Score

    Change from baseline in EORTC QLQ HCC 18 scale score were reported. EORTC 18-item hepatocellular cancer health-related quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-HCC18) was an 18-multi-item scales which were grouped into 8 symptom scales such as fatigue, body image, jaundice, nutrition, pain, fever, abdominal swelling and sex life. All scales were grouped and converted to scores of 0 to 100 according to the scoring manual; a higher score represented a more severe symptom or problem. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to date of first microwave ablation (including unscheduled assessments) or on the date of first microwave ablation but prior to the time of first probe placement.

    Measured: Baseline (Pre-Ablation), Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 (post ablation on Day 0)

  12. Health Economics: Complete Procedure Time

    Complete procedure time was defined as the time between the first probe placement and the last probe removal.

    Measured: Day 0 (On day of ablation treatment)

  13. Health Economics: Total Ablation Duration

    Total ablation duration were reported.

    Measured: Day 0 (On the day of ablation treatment)

  14. Health Economics: Median Number of Ablations

    The median number of ablations was reported.

    Measured: Day 0 (On the day of ablation treatment)

  15. Health Economics: Length of Hospital Stay

    Length of hospital stay were reported. Length of hospital stay was defined as the time from procedure completion to hospital discharge.

    Measured: Day 0 (On day of ablation treatment) up to 30 days (1-month post ablation visit)

  16. Health Economics: Percentage of Participants With Single and Multi Probes Usage

    Percentage of participants with single and multiple probes usage were reported. PR and LK probes were used at least once.

    Measured: Day 0 (On the day of ablation treatment)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Jul 2018
  2. Study start11 Dec 2017
  3. Primary completion21 May 2020
  4. Study completion11 May 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
33 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03586050
Sponsor's protocol ID
NEU_2017_01
Status last verified
Jun 2024
First submitted
8 Feb 2018
Last updated
24 Jul 2024
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Microwave ablation in people with Carcinoma, Hepatocellular and Hepatocellular Carcinoma, run by Ethicon, Inc. at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Aug 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants Whose Ablation Resulted in Technical Success (time frame: Post ablation procedure (Day 0) up to 4 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jul 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in