SuicideNCT03586895
e-Connect: A Service System Intervention for Justice Youth at Risk for Suicide
A study testing e-Connect in people with Suicide, run by Columbia University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The investigators propose to create e-Connect, a new service delivery model that will enable real time identification and targeted, county-specific referral and linkage of participants with suicidal behavior (SB) and related behavioral health (BH) problems. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 10 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Suicide
- What is being tested?
- e-Connect
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 12,838 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2019to 1 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 10 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Exclusion Criteria: There are no exclusionary criteria and no special classes of participants.
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Columbia University
New York, New York, 10032
Katherine Elkington, PhD, 917-838-1871, ke2143@cumc.columbia.edu
About this study
The investigators propose to create e-Connect, a new service delivery model that will enable real time identification and targeted, county-specific referral and linkage of participants with suicidal behavior (SB) and related behavioral health (BH) problems. e-Connect will: (i) establish and formalize interagency referral decisions based on clinical need, jointly derived by JJ (juvenile justice) and BH agencies; (ii) train probation staff to increase BH/SB understanding; (iii) utilize an existing evidence-based (EB) BH/SB screen; and (iv) develop a mobile application to seamlessly integrate screening, classification of clinical need and development of a related referral plan. There are 4 project phases: Development, Baseline, Implementation, and Sustainment/Evaluation. After development, activities take place in 10 NY (New York) counties and all study counties will begin the intervention at the same time. The investigators will examine changes in outcomes (e.g., service use) relative to baseline in (i) identification of participants service need (SB and BH correlates) in juvenile probationers; (ii) cross-system (probation-BH agency) referral; and (iii) participants BH service use (access and engagement). Analyses will further consider contributions of multi-level factors (e.g., staff, organizational, family, and community) that influence implementation (feasibility, acceptability, sustainability) of e-Connect across various probation department processing categories (e.g. status offenders, diversion cases). The investigators will consider the role of mediating elements (e.g., probation practices) in explaining the association between e-Connect and identification, referral, and service use.
Read the detailed description
While youth at all juvenile justice (JJ) processing points are at increased risk for suicidal behavior (SB) and associated behavioral health (BH) issues, those supervised in community settings (e.g., probation), may be at greatest risk: (a) protocols for identification and service referral are far more common in secure settings, (b) national policy increasingly favors community supervision/diversion over incarceration, (c) participants supervised in the community have far more access to means and opportunity than do those in secure settings, and (d) the multi- system coordination challenges to accessing BH care for community JJ participants are far greater than for those secure care. The investigators propose to adapt and test the utility of a multi-level service delivery model that increases identification of SB and related BH problems, guides targeted referral, trains staff and structures interagency collaboration to increase uptake of BH services by participants on probation; and document the organizational elements required to widely-implement this model in juvenile probation and community treatment settings. The model is based on our earlier, evidence-based linkage protocols from Project Connect, and capitalizes on technological advances unavailable at Connect's 2007 development, so as to address earlier implementation issues. Working in 10 NYS counties, project specific aims are (1) to develop technologically advanced cross-system identification/linkage service model that trains staff, formalizes interagency collaboration and referral decision-making and uses a mobile application to seamlessly combine (a) screening for SB and related BH problems, (b) classification of clinical need and (c) county-specific streamlined referral plans for BH services; (2) to examine the degree to which, compared to Baseline, e- Connect improves (a) intermediary PO practice outcomes (service need identification, cross-system referral) and increasing (b) participants BH service use (access, engagement); and (3) to elucidate multi-level factors (e.g., staff, organizational, participants/family, community,) that influence implementation (feasibility, acceptability, sustainability) of e-Connect across various probation department processing categories (e.g. status offenders, diversion cases) to inform comprehensive scale-up. The theoretically based mechanisms (e.g., changes in staff knowledge and self-efficacy; agency structural characteristics) by which PO practice change affects BH service use will also be examined. Guided by the GPM and CFIR framework, this 5-year study will comprise 4 project phases: (1) Development, (2) Baseline data collection, (3) Implementation, and (4) Sustainment. After development, it was originally planned that counties would be randomized to one of 4 Waves to begin implementation of e-Connect at 4-month intervals in a stepped-wedge design. Implementation activities continue for 18m and sites' use of e-Connect protocols after 18m will be an indication of sustainability. However, at the beginning of the trial, the state in which the current study was implemented introduced the raise the age policy requiring all adjusted youths on probation to receive an evidence-based BH screen. Thus, in order to be compliant with state mandates, all study counties had to begin the intervention at the same time, requiring a 'flattening' of the step-wedge design into a simple pre-post design. Due to this change, analyses were simplified as described in the statistical analysis section. This initiative is one of the first to address SB and advance JJ participants enrollment in BH treatment. Because the investigators propose addressing risk and acute SB, this study has the likelihood of identifying and linking to services high-risk, high need participants that are often overlooked.
- Conditions
- Suicide
- Being tested
- e-Connect
- Keywords
- Suicidal Behavior, Behavioral Health Problems, e-Connect
- Medical subject headings
- Suicide
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
e-ConnectBehavioural
e-Connect
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| e-Connect | Experimental | County receives training and materials and subsequently begins the e-Connect intervention Receives: Behavioral: e-Connect |
| Standard of care | No intervention | Counties use the standard of care and there is no intervention in practices. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Behavioral health treatment initiation
Date of first behavioral health appointment/contact extracted from state management information system (MIS)
Measured: Monthly in years 2- 5
Secondary outcomes (4)
Behavioral health referral
Clinically appropriate referral made by probation officer to behavioral health provider, based on screening results, indicated by referral date extracted from MIS
Measured: Day one of probation
Youth screened for risk of suicide
Evidence-based screening tool self administered by youth
Measured: Day one of probation
Family Experience and Fidelity of e-Connect
PO completes family debriefing checklist: family receptivity to screening results and referral plan
Measured: Bimonthly years 2-5
e-Connect Sustainability
Ongoing use of e-Connect during post implementation phase
Measured: end of implementation through sustainment period, monthly
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Jul 2018
- Study start1 Aug 2019
- Primary completion30 Jun 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Dec 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for SuicideStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Columbia UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Model description
- pre-post design
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 12,838 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Columbia University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- George Mason University, National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), Chestnut Health Systems
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Katherine Elkington, Columbia University
- Investigators
- Katherine Elkington, PhD, Principal investigator, Columbia University/New York State Psychiatric Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03586895
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AAAU8900
- Other IDs
- R01MH113599
- Status last verified
- Jun 2025
- First submitted
- 21 Jun 2018
- Last updated
- 24 Jun 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Wasserman GA, Elkington KS, Robson G, Taxman F. Bridging juvenile justice and behavioral health systems: development of a clinical pathways approach to connect youth at risk for suicidal behavior to care. Health Justice. 2021 Nov 29;9(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40352-021-00164-4.
PubMed 34845569
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Jun 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- e-Connect: A Service System Intervention for Justice Youth at Risk for Suicide
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03586895
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AAAU8900
- Conditions
- Suicide
- Keywords
- Suicidal Behavior, Behavioral Health Problems, e-Connect
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 12,838 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Columbia UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- George Mason University, National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), Chestnut Health Systems
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 16 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators propose to create e-Connect, a new service delivery model that will enable real time identification and targeted, county-specific referral and linkage of participants with suicidal behavior (SB) and related behavioral health (BH) problems. e-Connect will: (i) establish and formalize interagency referral decisions based on clinical need, jointly derived by JJ (juvenile justice) and BH agencies; (ii) train probation staff to increase BH/SB understanding; (iii) utilize an existing evidence-based (EB) BH/SB screen; and (iv) develop a mobile application to seamlessly integrate screening, classification of clinical need and development of a related referral plan. There are 4 project phases: Development, Baseline, Implementation, and Sustainment/Evaluation. After development, activities take place in 10 NY (New York) counties and all study counties will begin the intervention at the same time. The investigators will examine changes in outcomes (e.g., service use) relative to baseline in (i) identification of participants service need (SB and BH correlates) in juvenile probationers; (ii) cross-system (probation-BH agency) referral; and (iii) participants BH service use (access and engagement). Analyses will further consider contributions of multi-level factors (e.g., staff, organizational, family, and community) that influence implementation (feasibility, acceptability, sustainability) of e-Connect across various probation department processing categories (e.g. status offenders, diversion cases). The investigators will consider the role of mediating elements (e.g., probation practices) in explaining the association between e-Connect and identification, referral, and service use.
Detailed description
While youth at all juvenile justice (JJ) processing points are at increased risk for suicidal behavior (SB) and associated behavioral health (BH) issues, those supervised in community settings (e.g., probation), may be at greatest risk: (a) protocols for identification and service referral are far more common in secure settings, (b) national policy increasingly favors community supervision/diversion over incarceration, (c) participants supervised in the community have far more access to means and opportunity than do those in secure settings, and (d) the multi- system coordination challenges to accessing BH care for community JJ participants are far greater than for those secure care. The investigators propose to adapt and test the utility of a multi-level service delivery model that increases identification of SB and related BH problems, guides targeted referral, trains staff and structures interagency collaboration to increase uptake of BH services by participants on probation; and document the organizational elements required to widely-implement this model in juvenile probation and community treatment settings. The model is based on our earlier, evidence-based linkage protocols from Project Connect, and capitalizes on technological advances unavailable at Connect's 2007 development, so as to address earlier implementation issues. Working in 10 NYS counties, project specific aims are (1) to develop technologically advanced cross-system identification/linkage service model that trains staff, formalizes interagency collaboration and referral decision-making and uses a mobile application to seamlessly combine (a) screening for SB and related BH problems, (b) classification of clinical need and (c) county-specific streamlined referral plans for BH services; (2) to examine the degree to which, compared to Baseline, e- Connect improves (a) intermediary PO practice outcomes (service need identification, cross-system referral) and increasing (b) participants BH service use (access, engagement); and (3) to elucidate multi-level factors (e.g., staff, organizational, participants/family, community,) that influence implementation (feasibility, acceptability, sustainability) of e-Connect across various probation department processing categories (e.g. status offenders, diversion cases) to inform comprehensive scale-up. The theoretically based mechanisms (e.g., changes in staff knowledge and self-efficacy; agency structural characteristics) by which PO practice change affects BH service use will also be examined. Guided by the GPM and CFIR framework, this 5-year study will comprise 4 project phases: (1) Development, (2) Baseline data collection, (3) Implementation, and (4) Sustainment. After development, it was originally planned that counties would be randomized to one of 4 Waves to begin implementation of e-Connect at 4-month intervals in a stepped-wedge design. Implementation activities continue for 18m and sites' use of e-Connect protocols after 18m will be an indication of sustainability. However, at the beginning of the trial, the state in which the current study was implemented introduced the raise the age policy requiring all adjusted youths on probation to receive an evidence-based BH screen. Thus, in order to be compliant with state mandates, all study counties had to begin the intervention at the same time, requiring a 'flattening' of the step-wedge design into a simple pre-post design. Due to this change, analyses were simplified as described in the statistical analysis section. This initiative is one of the first to address SB and advance JJ participants enrollment in BH treatment. Because the investigators propose addressing risk and acute SB, this study has the likelihood of identifying and linking to services high-risk, high need participants that are often overlooked.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- pre-post design
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| e-Connect | Experimental | Behavioral: e-ConnectCounty receives training and materials and subsequently begins the e-Connect intervention |
| Standard of care | No intervention | –Counties use the standard of care and there is no intervention in practices. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 10 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Exclusion Criteria: There are no exclusionary criteria and no special classes of participants.
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| e-Connecte-Connect | Behavioural | e-Connect |
Primary outcome
Behavioral health treatment initiation
Time frame: Monthly in years 2- 5
Date of first behavioral health appointment/contact extracted from state management information system (MIS)
4 secondary outcomes
Behavioral health referral
Time frame: Day one of probation
Youth screened for risk of suicide
Time frame: Day one of probation
Family Experience and Fidelity of e-Connect
Time frame: Bimonthly years 2-5
e-Connect Sustainability
Time frame: end of implementation through sustainment period, monthly
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Jun 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34845569Wasserman GA, Elkington KS, Robson G, Taxman F. Bridging juvenile justice and behavioral health systems: development of a clinical pathways approach to connect youth at risk for suicidal behavior to care. Health Justice. 2021 Nov 29;9(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40352-021-00164-4.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Suicide
Active, not recruitingObservational study
The Developmental Origins of Suicide Mortality
Suicide Mortality
Recruiting
Preventing Suicidal Behavior With Diverse High-Risk Youth in Acute Care Settings
Suicide, Attempted, Suicide Ideation
Not yet recruiting
Deaf CBT-TS to Reduce Suicide Risk
Depression - Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety
Not yet recruiting
A Pre-post Study of a Lethal Means Safety Planning Intervention for Youth at Elevated Suicide Risk in the Emergency Department.
Suicidal Ideas, Suicidal Ideation
Active, not recruiting
Parent Intervention for Psychiatrically-Hospitalized Youth
Adolescent - Emotional Problem, Suicide and Self-harm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Katherine Elkington, PhD principal investigator
Columbia University/New York State Psychiatric Institute
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing e-Connect in people with Suicide, run by Columbia University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Katherine Elkington, PhD (16467746965, ke2143@cumc.columbia.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Behavioral health treatment initiation (time frame: Monthly in years 2- 5). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03586895, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jun 2025.