Pain, PostoperativePhase 3NCT03587025
Preemptive Analgesia With Amitryptyline for Prevention of Pain in Women After Hysterectomy
A Phase 3 study testing Amitriptyline in people with Pain, Postoperative, run by University of Campinas, Brazil at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether amitryptyline is effective in the prevention of pain in women after a total abdominal hysterectomy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain, Postoperative
- What is being tested?
- Amitriptyline
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 150 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2015to 30 Oct 2018
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Women scheduled for total abdominal hysterectomy for benign conditions (e.g. hemorrhagic and / or uterine fibroid disorder);
- Age between 18 and 60;
Who cannot join
- Endometriosis;
- Abnormal cervicovaginal smears;
- Uterine prolapse;
- Patients with a history of intolerance to opioids or narcotics;
- Patients with contraindications to the use of amitriptyline (e.g., ischemic heart disease, glaucoma)
- addicted to alcohol or drugs;
Show all 9Show fewer
- Use of analgesics in the 24 hours prior to the possible administration of amitriptyline;
- Failure to provide informed consent;
- Different anesthesia from spinal anesthesia
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Brazil1 site
FCM CG - Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de Campina Grande
Campina Grande, Paraíba, 58411-120
About this study
Official title: Preemptive Analgesia With Amitryptyline for Prevention of Post-operative Pain in Women After Total Abdominal Hysterectomy: a Randomized Clinical Trial
The purpose of this study is to determine whether amitryptyline is effective in the prevention of pain in women after a total abdominal hysterectomy.
Read the detailed description
It will be performed a randomized clinical trial, double-blind, placebo-controlled, with two branches: one group receiving preemptive analgesia with amitryptyline and one receiving placebo. Blind procedures (blinding):
- The participant does not know which group participates;
- The evaluator does not know to which group it belongs to every individual;
- The tablets provided to patients will be identical.
Study population All patients with total abdominal hysterectomy indication attended in Gynecological Surgery clinic of the Hospital Pedro I.
Sample
It will be obtained a non-consecutive probability sample offering to participate in the study to all women that is going to be submitted to total abdominal hysterectomy indication in the referral hospital from june 2015 to june 2016. Then these will be submitted to randomization process as explained later.
Calculation of the sample Size:
The calculation of sample size was performing using the online software in the public domain Openepi version 2.3.1 (Atlanta, GA). Were used as reference data found in clinical trial using gabapentin versus placebo (AJORI et al., 2011), in which it found an average of Visual Analog Scale score of 0.2 and a standard deviation of 0.8 for the group receiving gabapentin and average of 0.9 to 1.3 standard deviation for the group with placebo administration. For a power of 95% and a significance level of 5%, would require 124 patients (62 in each group) to highlight this difference. It is expected losses or post-randomization exclusion, was added to 20% of the total patients, resulting in 148.8 or approximately 150 patients (75 in each group).
Procedures for participants selection
Patients with total abdominal hysterectomy indication usually are hospitalized in the previous day in the hospital. They will be addressed by one of the researchers to apply a checklist with the criteria for inclusion and exclusion and, if eligible, will be invited to participate. The informed consent will be read aloud and those who agree to participate will then be randomized to one of the groups: amitriptyline or placebo.
Randomization Procedures
A list of random numbers will be previously prepared by a statistical oblivious to research in the public domain software Random Allocation Software version 2.0 (Ispaham, Iran), with 75 patients allocated to the amitriptyline group and 75 to the placebo group.
Boxes will be prepared to pack the tablets containing 25 mg of amitriptyline or placebo. Any amitryptyline as a placebo have been prepared by the hospital pharmacy with aspect (size, shape, weight and color) identical. Consecutively numbered boxes are packed in a 150 intended consecutively for each patient randomized. These boxes will be prepared by a pharmacist also oblivious to the research and researchers, and patients, will not be aware of its content, therefore ensuring it is the concealment of allocation.
Both tablets will be administered orally, with water being offered to patients in the period between six and twelve hours before the surgical procedure by the head nurse of the gynecology ward (blinded to the study), which should correspond to the nighttime for surgeries performed in the morning and the morning period for surgeries performed in the afternoon.
Data processing
The data collected should follow the following protocol for storage: should first occur data collection, followed by creation of a base number of patient follow-up with nine digits. The first six digits should refer to the day of collection in the day, month, year, each with two digits. The last three digits should be reserved to the sequence order in which the tests were performed. Thus, in the case of the first day the patient should be 001 if the second was 002 and so on. Eg patient number 070912005. It is known that was attended for the first time on 07/09/12 and that was the day the patient fifth part of the sample.
The data will be entered in a specific database created in the public domain Epi-Info 7.1.3 program and Medcalc version 13.2.2 or higher, at different times by two different people. After typing, the databases will be compared. Consistency tests and frequency distribution tables of the main variables will be obtained for any errors correction. In the case of finding inconsistencies or lack of information, the forms will be consulted. If doubt remains, will be made the consultation of the records.
At the end of typing, listings will be obtained again for the last correction and creating the final database, which will be submitted to cleaning tests and consistency of information, leading to the final database, which will be used for statistical analysis .
4.15.2 Data Analysis
Statistical analysis will be performed by researchers in the Epi-Info 7.1.3 and Medcalc version 13.2.2 or higher version available at the time, identifying the groups as A or B and breaking up the secrecy only after the results obtained and prepared the tables. Thus, only you know which group received amitriptyline or placebo at the end of the analysis.
The visual analogic scale can be recorded to binary mild / absent and moderate / severe pain pain, using cut-off points to be set later. It will also be analyzed as ordinal variable, using for comparison of the groups the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test. The same procedure is used to evaluate the satisfaction and depression, thereby obtaining categorical variables.
Categorical variables are compared in contingency tables using the chi-square tests of association and Fisher's exact test where appropriate. It will calculate the risk ratio (RR) as a relative measure of risk, determining the 95% confidence interval. The numbers needed to treat and get a benefit and number needed to treat and get a harm will still be calculated and their respective confidence intervals at 95%.
At every stage of the analysis will be adopted the significance level of 5%.
Ethics aspects
This study meets the requirements of the "Declaration of Helsinki" for research on human subjects, and Resolution 466/2012 of the National Health Council (BRAZIL MINISTRY OF HEALTH, 2012).
All participants will be informed about the research objectives and with free will to their participation or not. The participants will be informed about possible side effects and at the same time the possible beneficial effects of amitriptyline, being informed that they will not be aware will be using this drug or placebo. Patients should also be aware that any damage suffered can and preferably should be reported immediately to one of the evaluators. Example: adverse reaction to amitriptyline not provided in the package leaflet.
- Conditions
- Pain, Postoperative
- Being tested
- Amitriptyline, Placebo
- Keywords
- amitryptyline, Analgesia, Hysterectomy, Pain, Postoperative
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Postoperative, Agnosia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AmitriptylineDrug
Amitriptyline compared with placebo for preemptive analgesia in women after abdominal hysterectomy.
PlaceboDrug
Placebo
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Amitryptyline | Active comparator | Patients who will be take amitryptyline, 75mg, only use, 30min before surgery. Receives: Drug: Amitriptyline |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Patients who will be take placebo 30min before surgery. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Effectiveness of amitryptyline in the prevention of post-operative pain in women undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy, twenty-four hours after surgery
The postoperative pain will be measured twenty-four hours after surgery, using the visual pain scale (0 - no pain to 10 - very hard pain)
Measured: Twenty-four hours after surgery
Secondary outcomes (11)
Intensity of acute postoperative pain six hours after the procedure
It will be measured using the visual pain scale (0 - no pain to 10 - very hard pain)
Measured: Six hours after the procedure
Intensity of acute postoperative pain twelve hours after the procedure
It will be measured using the visual pain scale (0 - no pain to 10 - very hard pain)
Measured: Twelve hours after the procedure
Intensity of acute postoperative pain twenty-four hours after the procedure
It will be measured using the visual pain scale (0 - no pain to 10 - very hard pain)
Measured: Twenty-four hours after the procedure
Intensity of acute postoperative pain forty-eight hours after the procedure
It will be measured using the visual pain scale (0 - no pain to 10 - very hard pain)
Measured: forty-eight hours after the procedure
Records of rescue analgesia
Use of rescue analgesia with the infusion of morphine - It will be checked using the patient records at the hospital
Measured: From the end of the procedure until 48 hours after that
Compare surgical time (duration, in minutes) and frequency of intraoperative and postoperative complications
Relationship between surgical time (duration) and complications occurrence
Measured: From the end of the procedure until sixty days after that.
Frequency of adverse effects
Onset of adverse effects like migraine, sickness, numbness, vomiting, itching, etc
Measured: From the end of the procedure until 48 hours after that
Length of hospitalization
Time between admission and releasing, in hours
Measured: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital saty, an expected average of 48 hours.
Effectiveness of amitryptyline in the prevention of post-operative pain in women undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy, six hours after surgery
The postoperative pain will be measured after six hours after surgery, using the visual pain scale (0 - no pain to 10 - very hard pain)
Measured: Six hours after surgery.
Effectiveness of amitryptyline in the prevention of post-operative pain in women undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy, twelve hours after surgery
The postoperative pain will be measured after six hours after surgery, using the visual pain scale (0 - no pain to 10 - very hard pain)
Measured: Twelve hours after surgery
Effectiveness of amitryptyline in the prevention of post-operative pain in women undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy, forty-eight hours after surgery
The postoperative pain will be measured forty-eight hours after surgery, using the visual pain scale (0 - no pain to 10 - very hard pain)
Measured: Forty-eight hours after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Jul 2018
- Study start1 Jun 2015
- Primary completion30 Oct 2018
- Study completion30 Oct 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pain, PostoperativeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Campinas, Brazil
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Antonio Henriques de França Neto, University of Campinas, Brazil
- Investigators
- Guilherme V Mascena, PhD, Study chair, FCM-CG
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03587025
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IMIP
- Status last verified
- Nov 2018
- First submitted
- 8 Jul 2015
- Last updated
- 26 Nov 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Arsenault A, Sawynok J. Perisurgical amitriptyline produces a preventive effect on afferent hypersensitivity following spared nerve injury. Pain. 2009 Dec;146(3):308-314. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.08.003. Epub 2009 Sep 11.
PubMed 19748184Brandsborg B. Pain following hysterectomy: epidemiological and clinical aspects. Dan Med J. 2012 Jan;59(1):B4374.
PubMed 22239844Buvanendran A, Kroin JS, Della Valle CJ, Kari M, Moric M, Tuman KJ. Perioperative oral pregabalin reduces chronic pain after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2010 Jan 1;110(1):199-207. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181c4273a. Epub 2009 Nov 12.
PubMed 19910619Clarke-Pearson DL, Geller EJ. Complications of hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Mar;121(3):654-673. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182841594.
PubMed 23635631Goodwin SA. A review of preemptive analgesia. J Perianesth Nurs. 1998 Apr;13(2):109-14. doi: 10.1016/s1089-9472(98)80095-6.
PubMed 9592452Kehlet H, Jensen TS, Woolf CJ. Persistent postsurgical pain: risk factors and prevention. Lancet. 2006 May 13;367(9522):1618-25. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68700-X.
PubMed 16698416Moiniche S, Kehlet H, Dahl JB. A qualitative and quantitative systematic review of preemptive analgesia for postoperative pain relief: the role of timing of analgesia. Anesthesiology. 2002 Mar;96(3):725-41. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200203000-00032. No abstract available.
PubMed 11873051Ajori L, Nazari L, Mazloomfard MM, Amiri Z. Effects of gabapentin on postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting after abdominal hysterectomy: a double blind randomized clinical trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Mar;285(3):677-82. doi: 10.1007/s00404-011-2023-6. Epub 2011 Aug 5.
PubMed 21818576
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Nov 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Preemptive Analgesia With Amitryptyline for Prevention of Post-operative Pain in Women After Total Abdominal Hysterectomy: a Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03587025
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IMIP
- Conditions
- Pain, Postoperative
- Keywords
- amitryptyline, Analgesia, Hysterectomy, Pain, Postoperative
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Campinas, BrazilUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Oct 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether amitryptyline is effective in the prevention of pain in women after a total abdominal hysterectomy.
Detailed description
It will be performed a randomized clinical trial, double-blind, placebo-controlled, with two branches: one group receiving preemptive analgesia with amitryptyline and one receiving placebo. Blind procedures (blinding):
- The participant does not know which group participates;
- The evaluator does not know to which group it belongs to every individual;
- The tablets provided to patients will be identical.
Study population All patients with total abdominal hysterectomy indication attended in Gynecological Surgery clinic of the Hospital Pedro I.
Sample
It will be obtained a non-consecutive probability sample offering to participate in the study to all women that is going to be submitted to total abdominal hysterectomy indication in the referral hospital from june 2015 to june 2016. Then these will be submitted to randomization process as explained later.
Calculation of the sample Size:
The calculation of sample size was performing using the online software in the public domain Openepi version 2.3.1 (Atlanta, GA). Were used as reference data found in clinical trial using gabapentin versus placebo (AJORI et al., 2011), in which it found an average of Visual Analog Scale score of 0.2 and a standard deviation of 0.8 for the group receiving gabapentin and average of 0.9 to 1.3 standard deviation for the group with placebo administration. For a power of 95% and a significance level of 5%, would require 124 patients (62 in each group) to highlight this difference. It is expected losses or post-randomization exclusion, was added to 20% of the total patients, resulting in 148.8 or approximately 150 patients (75 in each group).
Procedures for participants selection
Patients with total abdominal hysterectomy indication usually are hospitalized in the previous day in the hospital. They will be addressed by one of the researchers to apply a checklist with the criteria for inclusion and exclusion and, if eligible, will be invited to participate. The informed consent will be read aloud and those who agree to participate will then be randomized to one of the groups: amitriptyline or placebo.
Randomization Procedures
A list of random numbers will be previously prepared by a statistical oblivious to research in the public domain software Random Allocation Software version 2.0 (Ispaham, Iran), with 75 patients allocated to the amitriptyline group and 75 to the placebo group.
Boxes will be prepared to pack the tablets containing 25 mg of amitriptyline or placebo. Any amitryptyline as a placebo have been prepared by the hospital pharmacy with aspect (size, shape, weight and color) identical. Consecutively numbered boxes are packed in a 150 intended consecutively for each patient randomized. These boxes will be prepared by a pharmacist also oblivious to the research and researchers, and patients, will not be aware of its content, therefore ensuring it is the concealment of allocation.
Both tablets will be administered orally, with water being offered to patients in the period between six and twelve hours before the surgical procedure by the head nurse of the gynecology ward (blinded to the study), which should correspond to the nighttime for surgeries performed in the morning and the morning period for surgeries performed in the afternoon.
Data processing
The data collected should follow the following protocol for storage: should first occur data collection, followed by creation of a base number of patient follow-up with nine digits. The first six digits should refer to the day of collection in the day, month, year, each with two digits. The last three digits should be reserved to the sequence order in which the tests were performed. Thus, in the case of the first day the patient should be 001 if the second was 002 and so on. Eg patient number 070912005. It is known that was attended for the first time on 07/09/12 and that was the day the patient fifth part of the sample.
The data will be entered in a specific database created in the public domain Epi-Info 7.1.3 program and Medcalc version 13.2.2 or higher, at different times by two different people. After typing, the databases will be compared. Consistency tests and frequency distribution tables of the main variables will be obtained for any errors correction. In the case of finding inconsistencies or lack of information, the forms will be consulted. If doubt remains, will be made the consultation of the records.
At the end of typing, listings will be obtained again for the last correction and creating the final database, which will be submitted to cleaning tests and consistency of information, leading to the final database, which will be used for statistical analysis .
4.15.2 Data Analysis
Statistical analysis will be performed by researchers in the Epi-Info 7.1.3 and Medcalc version 13.2.2 or higher version available at the time, identifying the groups as A or B and breaking up the secrecy only after the results obtained and prepared the tables. Thus, only you know which group received amitriptyline or placebo at the end of the analysis.
The visual analogic scale can be recorded to binary mild / absent and moderate / severe pain pain, using cut-off points to be set later. It will also be analyzed as ordinal variable, using for comparison of the groups the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test. The same procedure is used to evaluate the satisfaction and depression, thereby obtaining categorical variables.
Categorical variables are compared in contingency tables using the chi-square tests of association and Fisher's exact test where appropriate. It will calculate the risk ratio (RR) as a relative measure of risk, determining the 95% confidence interval. The numbers needed to treat and get a benefit and number needed to treat and get a harm will still be calculated and their respective confidence intervals at 95%.
At every stage of the analysis will be adopted the significance level of 5%.
Ethics aspects
This study meets the requirements of the "Declaration of Helsinki" for research on human subjects, and Resolution 466/2012 of the National Health Council (BRAZIL MINISTRY OF HEALTH, 2012).
All participants will be informed about the research objectives and with free will to their participation or not. The participants will be informed about possible side effects and at the same time the possible beneficial effects of amitriptyline, being informed that they will not be aware will be using this drug or placebo. Patients should also be aware that any damage suffered can and preferably should be reported immediately to one of the evaluators. Example: adverse reaction to amitriptyline not provided in the package leaflet.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Amitryptyline | Active comparator | Drug: AmitriptylinePatients who will be take amitryptyline, 75mg, only use, 30min before surgery. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboPatients who will be take placebo 30min before surgery. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Women scheduled for total abdominal hysterectomy for benign conditions (e.g. hemorrhagic and / or uterine fibroid disorder);
- Age between 18 and 60;
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Endometriosis;
- Abnormal cervicovaginal smears;
- Uterine prolapse;
- Patients with a history of intolerance to opioids or narcotics;
- Patients with contraindications to the use of amitriptyline (e.g., ischemic heart disease, glaucoma)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AmitriptylineAmitriptyline compared with placebo for preemptive analgesia in women after abdominal hysterectomy. | Drug | Amitryptyline |
| PlaceboPlacebo | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Effectiveness of amitryptyline in the prevention of post-operative pain in women undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy, twenty-four hours after surgery
Time frame: Twenty-four hours after surgery
The postoperative pain will be measured twenty-four hours after surgery, using the visual pain scale (0 - no pain to 10 - very hard pain)
11 secondary outcomes
Intensity of acute postoperative pain six hours after the procedure
Time frame: Six hours after the procedure
Intensity of acute postoperative pain twelve hours after the procedure
Time frame: Twelve hours after the procedure
Intensity of acute postoperative pain twenty-four hours after the procedure
Time frame: Twenty-four hours after the procedure
Intensity of acute postoperative pain forty-eight hours after the procedure
Time frame: forty-eight hours after the procedure
Records of rescue analgesia
Time frame: From the end of the procedure until 48 hours after that
Compare surgical time (duration, in minutes) and frequency of intraoperative and postoperative complications
Time frame: From the end of the procedure until sixty days after that.
Frequency of adverse effects
Time frame: From the end of the procedure until 48 hours after that
Length of hospitalization
Time frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital saty, an expected average of 48 hours.
Effectiveness of amitryptyline in the prevention of post-operative pain in women undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy, six hours after surgery
Time frame: Six hours after surgery.
Effectiveness of amitryptyline in the prevention of post-operative pain in women undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy, twelve hours after surgery
Time frame: Twelve hours after surgery
Effectiveness of amitryptyline in the prevention of post-operative pain in women undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy, forty-eight hours after surgery
Time frame: Forty-eight hours after surgery
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Nov 2018.
- Background: PubMed 19748184Arsenault A, Sawynok J. Perisurgical amitriptyline produces a preventive effect on afferent hypersensitivity following spared nerve injury. Pain. 2009 Dec;146(3):308-314. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.08.003. Epub 2009 Sep 11.
- Background: PubMed 22239844Brandsborg B. Pain following hysterectomy: epidemiological and clinical aspects. Dan Med J. 2012 Jan;59(1):B4374.
- Background: PubMed 19910619Buvanendran A, Kroin JS, Della Valle CJ, Kari M, Moric M, Tuman KJ. Perioperative oral pregabalin reduces chronic pain after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2010 Jan 1;110(1):199-207. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181c4273a. Epub 2009 Nov 12.
- Background: PubMed 23635631Clarke-Pearson DL, Geller EJ. Complications of hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Mar;121(3):654-673. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182841594.
- Background: PubMed 9592452Goodwin SA. A review of preemptive analgesia. J Perianesth Nurs. 1998 Apr;13(2):109-14. doi: 10.1016/s1089-9472(98)80095-6.
- Background: PubMed 16698416Kehlet H, Jensen TS, Woolf CJ. Persistent postsurgical pain: risk factors and prevention. Lancet. 2006 May 13;367(9522):1618-25. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68700-X.
- Background: PubMed 11873051Moiniche S, Kehlet H, Dahl JB. A qualitative and quantitative systematic review of preemptive analgesia for postoperative pain relief: the role of timing of analgesia. Anesthesiology. 2002 Mar;96(3):725-41. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200203000-00032. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 21818576Ajori L, Nazari L, Mazloomfard MM, Amiri Z. Effects of gabapentin on postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting after abdominal hysterectomy: a double blind randomized clinical trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Mar;285(3):677-82. doi: 10.1007/s00404-011-2023-6. Epub 2011 Aug 5.
Related trials for Pain, Postoperative
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
Recruiting
Effect of Cryotherapeutic and Nanotherapeutic Sodium Hypochlorite on Post-Operative Endodontic Pain.
Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis, Symptomatic Apical Periodontitis
RecruitingPhase 2
REctus Sheath Trial
Acute Pain, Postoperative Pain, Acute
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Pectoral Nerve Block (PECS) Using Magnesium Sulfate Added to Dexamethasone on Quality of Recovery and Chronic Post-Mastectomy Pain
Breast Cancer, Postoperative Pain
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Pain in Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section at Assuit University Hospital
Cesarean Section
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Guilherme V Mascena, PhD study chair
FCM-CG
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Amitriptyline in people with Pain, Postoperative, run by University of Campinas, Brazil at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Nov 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Effectiveness of amitryptyline in the prevention of post-operative pain in women undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy, twenty-four hours after surgery (time frame: Twenty-four hours after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03587025, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Nov 2018.