Breast CancerIMPETONCT03587259
Innovation in Mammography: Tomosynthesis Pathways
A study testing Tomosynthesis and 2D mammography in people with Breast Cancer, run by Cancer Prevention and Research Institute, Italy at 2 sites in Italy.
Trial summary
The study aims at evaluating the introduction of tomosynthesis in mammography screening, analyzing the benefits, disadvantages and feasibility in current clinical practice. It involves women aged 45-46 that will be divided, by drawing lots, into two groups: one group will do the 2D digital mammography (control group)… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 45 to 46 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Tomosynthesis and 2D mammography
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 6,000 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesItaly
- Study dates
- 3 Sep 2018to 1 Sep 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 45 to 46 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- 45-46 years old women resident in the screening area
Who cannot join
- previous breast cancer
- written refusal to participate in the screening programme
- pregnancy, breastfeeding
- presence of prostheses;
- ongoing chemotherapy;
- impossibility to submit the informed consent for linguistic problems or for inability of women to provide informed consent;
- verified presence of BRCA1 - BRCA2 (Breast Related Cancer Antigens 1 - Breast Related Cancer Antigens 2) genetic mutation or involvement in surveillance path for heredo-familial tumor;
- previous known tomosynthesis.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Italy2 sites
South-Est Local Health Unit
Arezzo, 52100
Roberto Turillazzi, MDr, roberto.turillazzi@uslsudest.toscana.it
Oncological Network, Prevention and Research Institute
Florence, 50139
Paola Mantellini, MDr
About this study
The study aims at evaluating the introduction of tomosynthesis in mammography screening, analyzing the benefits, disadvantages and feasibility in current clinical practice.
It involves women aged 45-46 that will be divided, by drawing lots, into two groups: one group will do the 2D digital mammography (control group), while the other group (intervention group) will do tomosynthesis. In the intervention group the 2D two-dimensional mammography will be reconstructed starting from tomosynthesis without exposing women to other radiation.
Read the detailed description
The IMPETO trial is a population-based, multicentre, randomised trial aimed at evaluating the clinical accuracy of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) in adjunct to synthetic mammograms (sDM) compared to standard two-dimensional digital mammography alone (2D) in a screening programme.
45-46 year-old women resident in the screening centre catchment area of Florence and South-Est Local Health Unit are invited to attend for mammography screening and asked for informed consent to be included in the study. Women are then randomly allocated either to an usual care group (2D mammography) or to the intervention group. In the intervention group, DBT combined with sDM is proposed in order to reduce radiation exposure. The next year women of both groups will be invited to attend the usual screening examination (2D mammography). The enrolment will last 12-18 months; the whole study 36 months. The estimated sample size is 6000 women, 3000 per arm. Data will be pooled with the trial "Screening for Breast Cancer With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis", ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02698202.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- Tomosynthesis, 2D mammography
- Keywords
- breast cancer screening, tomosynthesis, digital mammography
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TomosynthesisDiagnostic test
Also called Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT)
DBT is a x-ray examination that allows to visualize the breast on 3 planes (3D) and therefore to help to see lesions hardly visible to mammography due to the overlap of glandular tissue.
2D mammographyDiagnostic test
2D mammography is a X-ray examinations used to detect breast cancer in the screening programme.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 2D mammography | Active comparator | 45-46 years old women are invited to attend the usual screening examination (2D mammography). The next year they will be invited to make a 2D mammography, according to screening protocol. Receives: Diagnostic Test: 2D mammography |
| Tomosynthesis | Experimental | 45-46 years old women are invited to attend the Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) in adjunct to synthetic mammograms (sDM). The next year they will be invited to make a 2D mammography, according to screening protocol. Receives: Diagnostic Test: Tomosynthesis |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
the cumulative incidence of advanced screen-detected cancers (T2 +) and the cumulative incidence of advanced interval cancers (T2 +)
number of T2+ screen-detected cancers divided by all screened women at subsequent round of screening and number of T2+ interval cancers divided by all screened women at subsequent round of screening.
Measured: three years
Secondary outcomes (4)
recall rate
number of women recalled to perform 2nd level assessments) for invasive tests and for non-invasive examinations in the two arms divided by the number of screened women
Measured: two years
detection rate
number of breast cancer cases (invasive and in situ forms) divided by the number of screened women (per 1,000)
Measured: two years
benign biopsies rate
number of benign biopsies divided by the total number of biopsies
Measured: two years
cost analysis
an activity based cost analysis will be performed in order to obtain the real costs of DBT screening pathway.
Measured: two years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Jul 2018
- Study start3 Sep 2018 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Sep 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Sep 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 6,000 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cancer Prevention and Research Institute, Italy
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Paola Mantellini, MDr, Principal investigator, Oncological Network, Prevention and Research Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03587259
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- F16J16000620002
- Acronym
- IMPETO
- Status last verified
- Jul 2018
- First submitted
- 27 Jun 2018
- Last updated
- 16 Jul 2018
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Ciatto S, Houssami N, Bernardi D, Caumo F, Pellegrini M, Brunelli S, Tuttobene P, Bricolo P, Fanto C, Valentini M, Montemezzi S, Macaskill P. Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jun;14(7):583-9. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70134-7. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
PubMed 23623721Skaane P, Bandos AI, Gullien R, Eben EB, Ekseth U, Haakenaasen U, Izadi M, Jebsen IN, Jahr G, Krager M, Niklason LT, Hofvind S, Gur D. Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. Radiology. 2013 Apr;267(1):47-56. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12121373. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
PubMed 23297332Gilbert FJ, Tucker L, Gillan MG, Willsher P, Cooke J, Duncan KA, Michell MJ, Dobson HM, Lim YY, Purushothaman H, Strudley C, Astley SM, Morrish O, Young KC, Duffy SW. The TOMMY trial: a comparison of TOMosynthesis with digital MammographY in the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme--a multicentre retrospective reading study comparing the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography with digital mammography alone. Health Technol Assess. 2015 Jan;19(4):i-xxv, 1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta19040.
PubMed 25599513Skaane P, Bandos AI, Eben EB, Jebsen IN, Krager M, Haakenaasen U, Ekseth U, Izadi M, Hofvind S, Gullien R. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images. Radiology. 2014 Jun;271(3):655-63. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13131391. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
PubMed 24484063Paci E, Mantellini P, Giorgi Rossi P, Falini P, Puliti D; TBST Working Group. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)]. Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Jul-Oct;37(4-5):317-27. Italian.
PubMed 24293498McDonald ES, McCarthy AM, Akhtar AL, Synnestvedt MB, Schnall M, Conant EF. Baseline Screening Mammography: Performance of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Nov;205(5):1143-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.14406.
PubMed 26496565Bernardi D, Ciatto S, Pellegrini M, Anesi V, Burlon S, Cauli E, Depaoli M, Larentis L, Malesani V, Targa L, Baldo P, Houssami N. Application of breast tomosynthesis in screening: incremental effect on mammography acquisition and reading time. Br J Radiol. 2012 Dec;85(1020):e1174-8. doi: 10.1259/bjr/19385909.
PubMed 23175484Bernardi D, Belli P, Benelli E, Brancato B, Bucchi L, Calabrese M, Carbonaro LA, Caumo F, Cavallo-Marincola B, Clauser P, Fedato C, Frigerio A, Galli V, Giordano L, Giorgi Rossi P, Golinelli P, Morrone D, Mariscotti G, Martincich L, Montemezzi S, Naldoni C, Paduos A, Panizza P, Pediconi F, Querci F, Rizzo A, Saguatti G, Tagliafico A, Trimboli RM, Zappa M, Zuiani C, Sardanelli F. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): recommendations from the Italian College of Breast Radiologists (ICBR) by the Italian Society of Medical Radiology (SIRM) and the Italian Group for Mammography Screening (GISMa). Radiol Med. 2017 Oct;122(10):723-730. doi: 10.1007/s11547-017-0769-z. Epub 2017 May 25.
PubMed 28540564Lang K, Andersson I, Rosso A, Tingberg A, Timberg P, Zackrisson S. Performance of one-view breast tomosynthesis as a stand-alone breast cancer screening modality: results from the Malmo Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial, a population-based study. Eur Radiol. 2016 Jan;26(1):184-90. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3803-3. Epub 2015 May 1.
PubMed 25929946Lang K, Nergarden M, Andersson I, Rosso A, Zackrisson S. False positives in breast cancer screening with one-view breast tomosynthesis: An analysis of findings leading to recall, work-up and biopsy rates in the Malmo Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial. Eur Radiol. 2016 Nov;26(11):3899-3907. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4265-y. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
PubMed 26943342
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Jul 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Innovation in Mammography: Tomosynthesis Pathways
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03587259
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IMPETO / F16J16000620002
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Keywords
- breast cancer screening, tomosynthesis, digital mammography
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 6,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Cancer Prevention and Research Institute, ItalyUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 3 Sep 2018 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Sep 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Sep 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 16 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study aims at evaluating the introduction of tomosynthesis in mammography screening, analyzing the benefits, disadvantages and feasibility in current clinical practice.
It involves women aged 45-46 that will be divided, by drawing lots, into two groups: one group will do the 2D digital mammography (control group), while the other group (intervention group) will do tomosynthesis. In the intervention group the 2D two-dimensional mammography will be reconstructed starting from tomosynthesis without exposing women to other radiation.
Detailed description
The IMPETO trial is a population-based, multicentre, randomised trial aimed at evaluating the clinical accuracy of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) in adjunct to synthetic mammograms (sDM) compared to standard two-dimensional digital mammography alone (2D) in a screening programme.
45-46 year-old women resident in the screening centre catchment area of Florence and South-Est Local Health Unit are invited to attend for mammography screening and asked for informed consent to be included in the study. Women are then randomly allocated either to an usual care group (2D mammography) or to the intervention group. In the intervention group, DBT combined with sDM is proposed in order to reduce radiation exposure. The next year women of both groups will be invited to attend the usual screening examination (2D mammography). The enrolment will last 12-18 months; the whole study 36 months. The estimated sample size is 6000 women, 3000 per arm. Data will be pooled with the trial "Screening for Breast Cancer With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis", ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02698202.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 2D mammography | Active comparator | Diagnostic Test: 2D mammography45-46 years old women are invited to attend the usual screening examination (2D mammography). The next year they will be invited to make a 2D mammography, according to screening protocol. |
| Tomosynthesis | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: Tomosynthesis45-46 years old women are invited to attend the Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) in adjunct to synthetic mammograms (sDM). The next year they will be invited to make a 2D mammography, according to screening protocol. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 45 to 46 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- 45-46 years old women resident in the screening area
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- previous breast cancer
- written refusal to participate in the screening programme
- pregnancy, breastfeeding
- presence of prostheses;
- ongoing chemotherapy;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TomosynthesisAlso: Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT)DBT is a x-ray examination that allows to visualize the breast on 3 planes (3D) and therefore to help to see lesions hardly visible to mammography due to the overlap of glandular tissue. | Diagnostic test | Tomosynthesis |
| 2D mammography2D mammography is a X-ray examinations used to detect breast cancer in the screening programme. | Diagnostic test | 2D mammography |
Primary outcome
the cumulative incidence of advanced screen-detected cancers (T2 +) and the cumulative incidence of advanced interval cancers (T2 +)
Time frame: three years
number of T2+ screen-detected cancers divided by all screened women at subsequent round of screening and number of T2+ interval cancers divided by all screened women at subsequent round of screening.
4 secondary outcomes
recall rate
Time frame: two years
detection rate
Time frame: two years
benign biopsies rate
Time frame: two years
cost analysis
Time frame: two years
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Jul 2018.
- Background: PubMed 23623721Ciatto S, Houssami N, Bernardi D, Caumo F, Pellegrini M, Brunelli S, Tuttobene P, Bricolo P, Fanto C, Valentini M, Montemezzi S, Macaskill P. Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jun;14(7):583-9. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70134-7. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
- Background: PubMed 23297332Skaane P, Bandos AI, Gullien R, Eben EB, Ekseth U, Haakenaasen U, Izadi M, Jebsen IN, Jahr G, Krager M, Niklason LT, Hofvind S, Gur D. Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. Radiology. 2013 Apr;267(1):47-56. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12121373. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
- Background: PubMed 25599513Gilbert FJ, Tucker L, Gillan MG, Willsher P, Cooke J, Duncan KA, Michell MJ, Dobson HM, Lim YY, Purushothaman H, Strudley C, Astley SM, Morrish O, Young KC, Duffy SW. The TOMMY trial: a comparison of TOMosynthesis with digital MammographY in the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme--a multicentre retrospective reading study comparing the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography with digital mammography alone. Health Technol Assess. 2015 Jan;19(4):i-xxv, 1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta19040.
- Background: PubMed 24484063Skaane P, Bandos AI, Eben EB, Jebsen IN, Krager M, Haakenaasen U, Ekseth U, Izadi M, Hofvind S, Gullien R. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images. Radiology. 2014 Jun;271(3):655-63. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13131391. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
- Background: PubMed 24293498Paci E, Mantellini P, Giorgi Rossi P, Falini P, Puliti D; TBST Working Group. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)]. Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Jul-Oct;37(4-5):317-27. Italian.
- Background: PubMed 26496565McDonald ES, McCarthy AM, Akhtar AL, Synnestvedt MB, Schnall M, Conant EF. Baseline Screening Mammography: Performance of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Nov;205(5):1143-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.14406.
- Background: PubMed 23175484Bernardi D, Ciatto S, Pellegrini M, Anesi V, Burlon S, Cauli E, Depaoli M, Larentis L, Malesani V, Targa L, Baldo P, Houssami N. Application of breast tomosynthesis in screening: incremental effect on mammography acquisition and reading time. Br J Radiol. 2012 Dec;85(1020):e1174-8. doi: 10.1259/bjr/19385909.
- Background: PubMed 28540564Bernardi D, Belli P, Benelli E, Brancato B, Bucchi L, Calabrese M, Carbonaro LA, Caumo F, Cavallo-Marincola B, Clauser P, Fedato C, Frigerio A, Galli V, Giordano L, Giorgi Rossi P, Golinelli P, Morrone D, Mariscotti G, Martincich L, Montemezzi S, Naldoni C, Paduos A, Panizza P, Pediconi F, Querci F, Rizzo A, Saguatti G, Tagliafico A, Trimboli RM, Zappa M, Zuiani C, Sardanelli F. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): recommendations from the Italian College of Breast Radiologists (ICBR) by the Italian Society of Medical Radiology (SIRM) and the Italian Group for Mammography Screening (GISMa). Radiol Med. 2017 Oct;122(10):723-730. doi: 10.1007/s11547-017-0769-z. Epub 2017 May 25.
- Background: PubMed 25929946Lang K, Andersson I, Rosso A, Tingberg A, Timberg P, Zackrisson S. Performance of one-view breast tomosynthesis as a stand-alone breast cancer screening modality: results from the Malmo Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial, a population-based study. Eur Radiol. 2016 Jan;26(1):184-90. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3803-3. Epub 2015 May 1.
- Background: PubMed 26943342Lang K, Nergarden M, Andersson I, Rosso A, Zackrisson S. False positives in breast cancer screening with one-view breast tomosynthesis: An analysis of findings leading to recall, work-up and biopsy rates in the Malmo Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial. Eur Radiol. 2016 Nov;26(11):3899-3907. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4265-y. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Psilocybin-Assisted Psychotherapy in Cancer Patients With Adjustment Disorder
Adjustment Disorder, Adjustment Disorder With Anxious Mood
Recruiting
Evaluation of the Effect of Using Ultrasound Robots for Breast Cancer Screening
Breast Cancer, Ultrasound
RecruitingPhase 3
Evaluation of Lasofoxifene Combined With Abemaciclib Compared With Fulvestrant Combined With Abemaciclib in Locally Advanced or Metastatic ER+/HER2- Breast Cancer With an ESR1 Mutation
Metastatic Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Interest of Broadband Spectroscopy Analysis by Infrared Laser on Liquid Biopsies in Breast Cancer Screening
Breast Cancer Female, BRCA1 Mutation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Paola Mantellini, MDr principal investigator
Oncological Network, Prevention and Research Institute
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Tomosynthesis and 2D mammography in people with Breast Cancer, run by Cancer Prevention and Research Institute, Italy at 2 sites in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Paola Mantellini, MDr (05532697961, p.mantellini@ispro.toscana.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
the cumulative incidence of advanced screen-detected cancers (T2 +) and the cumulative incidence of advanced interval cancers (T2 +) (time frame: three years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03587259, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jul 2018.