TeleglaucomaTeleglaucomaNCT03587454
Feasibility of Teleglaucoma Versus Conventional Clinical Evaluation for Diagnostic Accuracy and Management Recommendations in Patients With Glaucoma
A study testing Teleglaucoma in people with Teleglaucoma and Teleophthalmology, run by Rutgers University.
Trial summary
Telemedicine allows screening of subjects with limited access to eye care. Failure of screenees to come for full examination was identified as a serious problem. Teleglaucoma should allow a single physician access to screenees in real time. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Teleglaucoma, Teleophthalmology, Glaucoma
- What is being tested?
- Teleglaucoma
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 107 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Aug 2016to 1 Sep 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients with glaucoma or who are glaucoma suspects
Who cannot join
- Physical limitations precluding image acquisition like the inability to position for imaging or the inability to acquire images/testing
About this study
Official title: TELEGLAUCOMA: THE NJ HEALTH FOUNDATION STUDY a Prospective, Single Site, Masked Study Comparing the Diagnostic Accuracy and Management Recommendations of Teleglaucoma to Conventional Clinical Care in Patients With Glaucoma
Telemedicine allows screening of subjects with limited access to eye care. Failure of screenees to come for full examination was identified as a serious problem. Teleglaucoma should allow a single physician access to screenees in real time. The investigators aim to test the technical feasibility of developing a system for teleglaucoma that will allow a physician real time access to patient information and images and compare it to traditional physical presence evaluation in glaucoma clinics. This system can be applied during telemedicine for glaucoma and other vision threatening diseases.
Read the detailed description
Research Plan including Methods
Investigators propose to develop a program for teleglaucoma and to validate it for patient care outcomes. The study will be conducted in two phases. The first phase will establish the technical foundation for the teleophthalmology system; the second phase will investigate the clinical impact of teleglaucoma.
Phase I: Investigators will develop and test technical aspects of a teleophthalmology system for glaucoma. Phase II will evaluate the impact of teleglaucoma on patient care outcomes.
Phase I. Development and Validation of a Teleophthalmology System in Glaucoma. By partnering with an ongoing telemedicine program at the Institute of Ophthalmology \& Visual Science (IOVS), investigators will develop and test a system for telemedicine in glaucoma. In this phase, a wireless secure telemedicine system will be assembled that allows real-time access to participant subject screening data and images. The teleophthalmology system will be used and tested during telemedicine screening operations that are conducted by the investigators telemedicine team monthly in NJ. Telemedicine screenings occur all over the state of NJ at community centers, schools, places of worship, soup kitchens, other.
Telemedicine system component assembly: Integration to imaging equipment, setup, installation, and training of personnel will be performed.
In summary, this phase includes setup of imaging equipment (anterior segment and fundus camera) to the system, training of personnel, and post-installation quality checks by a communication technology expert. The server and specialized software will be customized for data entry, storage and display of selected patient health data in a secure configuration for internet access. Data obtained during routine IOVS telemedicine outreach program screening including demographic data, medical and ocular history, comprehensive ocular screening data (including imaging of the anterior and posterior ocular segments) will be configured for real time remote access by a physician. This phase also includes obtaining license to access a secure connection, and system configuration to allow data to be encrypted and securely transmitted using a Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) format. Virtual storage of data will be configured, and monitors with visualization technology applications will be installed to communicate with the imaging devices used in telemedicine.
During this phase quality measures will be tracked, recorded and analyzed. Those system quality checks will include 1. quality of acquired and transmitted ocular images (exposure, color, focus, etc.) 2. data security (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine encryption) 3. speed of data transmission (real-time network streamlining, interruptions and delays) obtained during each testing session.
Phase II. Patient Outcomes: Teleglaucoma vs Conventional Care
A population of patients seeking glaucoma care at IOVS glaucoma clinics will be included in this phase of the study. Subjects will be enrolled over a 6 month period. Subjects referred to or who are established patients at IOVS' glaucoma clinics will be enrolled on the same day in the teleglaucoma screening program and glaucoma clinic (physical presence). Two glaucoma fellowship-trained physician investigators will perform diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations during teleglaucoma and in glaucoma clinics. Participant patients will go through the consent process. All questions about the study will be explained by investigators. Upon consent process completion the participant will first undergo testing through the telemedicine protocol (see below). Data and images will then be transmitted. The investigator physician evaluating teleglaucoma data will assess the patient data and a diagnosis, management and follow-up recommendation will be made. The participant subject will then proceed to glaucoma clinic, where the participant will be examined by the investigator physician in the glaucoma clinic according to standard of care practices. The investigator physician physically present in the glaucoma clinics and the investigator physician in the teleglaucoma reading room will be masked to each other's recommendations regarding diagnostic tests and therapeutic recommendations.
Data regarding the accuracy of diagnostic tests (e.g., visual acuity, tonometry, optic nerve assessment, and other routine glaucoma tests) from teleglaucoma and from physical presence will be compared. The accuracy of glaucoma diagnosis (no glaucoma, glaucoma suspect, confirmed Glaucoma) and management recommendations will also be compared. Parameters to be studied will include comparisons of LogMAR visual acuity, tonometry, ocular examination and particularly optic nerve evaluation (estimation of vertical and horizontal cup-to-disc ratio, presence of signs of glaucomatous neuropathy: disc hemorrhage, notching, localized pallor, and asymmetry in cup-to-disc ratio of the two eyes >0.2 disc diameters, among others). Limitations to an adequate ocular examination or imaging during teleglaucoma and physical presence will be tracked. Inter-observer agreement between the two arms (teleglaucoma and physical presence) will be determined.
The accuracy of glaucoma diagnosis, i.e., confirmed glaucoma, glaucoma suspect, no glaucoma, as well as management recommendations, i.e., monitoring care, therapeutic interventions, obtained via teleglaucoma and physical presence will be compared. Statistical analyses will be performed on collected data. All data will be collected by subject codes. No protected health information will be gathered. Statistical analysis will be performed using statistical software through consultation with a statistician.
- Conditions
- Teleglaucoma, Teleophthalmology, Glaucoma
- Being tested
- Teleglaucoma
- Keywords
- teleglaucoma, teleophthalmology
- Medical subject headings
- Glaucoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TeleglaucomaDiagnostic test
Also called teleophthalmology
Subjects are evaluated through a teleglaucoma protocol then by physical presence in a glaucoma clinic
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Tele-Glaucoma arm | Experimental | Subjects enrolled in tele-glaucoma arm for remote assessment Receives: Diagnostic Test: Teleglaucoma |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Comparison of diagnosis and management in Teleglaucoma and conventional care
Qualitative categorical outcome:
Glaucoma Diagnosis, Management and follow up are clinical determinations by the investigator that are based on the overall clinical evaluation of the subject
Diagnosis: A. no glaucoma B. confirmed glaucoma
Management: A. maintain current therapy, B. advance therapy (additional glaucoma medication or surgical glaucoma intervention), C. no therapy needed
Follow up: A. urgent (less than 4 weeks from time of evaluation) B. routine (more than 4 weeks from time of evaluation)
Measured: 24 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
Assessment of diagnostic tools during teleglaucoma: Visual acuity
Quantitative outcome:
Visual Acuity will be measured on the Snellen chart and then converted to a Log MAR scale (Logarithm of the Minimal Angle of Resolution scale= Log MAR scale). Log MAR scale:
0.0 to 2.0 units (in increments of 0.2) with 0.0 units representing 20/20 visual acuity (normal vision) and higher numbers representing worse visual acuity (2.0 units representing poor vision of 20/2000)
Measured: 12 months
Assessment of diagnostic tools during teleglaucoma: Tonometry
Quantitative outcome:
Tonometry will be measured using a Goldmann applanation tonometer and a puff tonometer. All measurements will be in mm Hg, range 0.0-60.0 mm Hg (in increments of 1 mm Hg). Normal range is 6-21 mm Hg. Measurements below 6 and above 21 mm Hg are considered outside the normal range.
Measured: 12 months
Assessment of diagnostic tools during tele glaucoma: Optic nerve
Quantitative outcome:
Vertical and Horizontal cup-to-disc rations 0.0-1.0 (in increments of 0.1) will be measured. Ratio>0.6 are considered higher risk for glaucoma.
All measurements will be made by investigators on a high resolution monitor in a dark room. Investigators will be masked to one another assessments in instances were multiple readings are obtained. Images will be presented in a random order when multiple measures are obtained. Other Anterior and posterior segment pathology will be qualitatively noted (cataract, narrow angle, cornea pathology, diabetic retinopathy, age related macular degeneration, other).
Measured: 12 months
Assessment of diagnostic tools during tele glaucoma: Optical Coherence Tomography
Quantitative outcome:
Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) will be used to obtain images of the anterior and posterior ocular segments.
Quantitative measures in micron: 0-900 micron (+/- 5 micron) will be recorded for the cornea, optic nerve and retina. The range of normal is based on reference data that is age and racially determined.
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Jul 2018
- Study startAug 2016
- Primary completion1 Sep 2019
- Study completion1 Sep 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for TeleglaucomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Model description
- Prospective sequential enrolment in teleglaucoma then conventional glaucoma clinical care
- Enrolment
- 107 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Rutgers University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- New Jersey Health Foundation
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Albert S Khouri, MD, Rutgers University
- Investigators
- Albert S Khouri, MD, Principal investigator, Rutgers University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03587454
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Pro20140001070
- Acronym
- Teleglaucoma
- Status last verified
- Aug 2021
- First submitted
- 21 May 2018
- Last updated
- 23 Aug 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Chandrasekaran S, Kass W, Thangamathesvaran L, Mendez N, Khouri P, Szirth BC, Khouri AS. Tele-glaucoma versus clinical evaluation: The New Jersey Health Foundation Prospective Clinical Study. J Telemed Telecare. 2020 Oct;26(9):536-544. doi: 10.1177/1357633X19845273. Epub 2019 May 28.
PubMed 31138016
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Aug 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- TELEGLAUCOMA: THE NJ HEALTH FOUNDATION STUDY a Prospective, Single Site, Masked Study Comparing the Diagnostic Accuracy and Management Recommendations of Teleglaucoma to Conventional Clinical Care in Patients With Glaucoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03587454
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Teleglaucoma / Pro20140001070
- Conditions
- Teleglaucoma, Teleophthalmology, Glaucoma
- Keywords
- teleglaucoma, teleophthalmology
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 107 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Rutgers UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- New Jersey Health Foundation
- Study start
- Aug 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Sep 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Telemedicine allows screening of subjects with limited access to eye care. Failure of screenees to come for full examination was identified as a serious problem. Teleglaucoma should allow a single physician access to screenees in real time. The investigators aim to test the technical feasibility of developing a system for teleglaucoma that will allow a physician real time access to patient information and images and compare it to traditional physical presence evaluation in glaucoma clinics. This system can be applied during telemedicine for glaucoma and other vision threatening diseases.
Detailed description
Research Plan including Methods
Investigators propose to develop a program for teleglaucoma and to validate it for patient care outcomes. The study will be conducted in two phases. The first phase will establish the technical foundation for the teleophthalmology system; the second phase will investigate the clinical impact of teleglaucoma.
Phase I: Investigators will develop and test technical aspects of a teleophthalmology system for glaucoma. Phase II will evaluate the impact of teleglaucoma on patient care outcomes.
Phase I. Development and Validation of a Teleophthalmology System in Glaucoma. By partnering with an ongoing telemedicine program at the Institute of Ophthalmology \& Visual Science (IOVS), investigators will develop and test a system for telemedicine in glaucoma. In this phase, a wireless secure telemedicine system will be assembled that allows real-time access to participant subject screening data and images. The teleophthalmology system will be used and tested during telemedicine screening operations that are conducted by the investigators telemedicine team monthly in NJ. Telemedicine screenings occur all over the state of NJ at community centers, schools, places of worship, soup kitchens, other.
Telemedicine system component assembly: Integration to imaging equipment, setup, installation, and training of personnel will be performed.
In summary, this phase includes setup of imaging equipment (anterior segment and fundus camera) to the system, training of personnel, and post-installation quality checks by a communication technology expert. The server and specialized software will be customized for data entry, storage and display of selected patient health data in a secure configuration for internet access. Data obtained during routine IOVS telemedicine outreach program screening including demographic data, medical and ocular history, comprehensive ocular screening data (including imaging of the anterior and posterior ocular segments) will be configured for real time remote access by a physician. This phase also includes obtaining license to access a secure connection, and system configuration to allow data to be encrypted and securely transmitted using a Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) format. Virtual storage of data will be configured, and monitors with visualization technology applications will be installed to communicate with the imaging devices used in telemedicine.
During this phase quality measures will be tracked, recorded and analyzed. Those system quality checks will include 1. quality of acquired and transmitted ocular images (exposure, color, focus, etc.) 2. data security (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine encryption) 3. speed of data transmission (real-time network streamlining, interruptions and delays) obtained during each testing session.
Phase II. Patient Outcomes: Teleglaucoma vs Conventional Care
A population of patients seeking glaucoma care at IOVS glaucoma clinics will be included in this phase of the study. Subjects will be enrolled over a 6 month period. Subjects referred to or who are established patients at IOVS' glaucoma clinics will be enrolled on the same day in the teleglaucoma screening program and glaucoma clinic (physical presence). Two glaucoma fellowship-trained physician investigators will perform diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations during teleglaucoma and in glaucoma clinics. Participant patients will go through the consent process. All questions about the study will be explained by investigators. Upon consent process completion the participant will first undergo testing through the telemedicine protocol (see below). Data and images will then be transmitted. The investigator physician evaluating teleglaucoma data will assess the patient data and a diagnosis, management and follow-up recommendation will be made. The participant subject will then proceed to glaucoma clinic, where the participant will be examined by the investigator physician in the glaucoma clinic according to standard of care practices. The investigator physician physically present in the glaucoma clinics and the investigator physician in the teleglaucoma reading room will be masked to each other's recommendations regarding diagnostic tests and therapeutic recommendations.
Data regarding the accuracy of diagnostic tests (e.g., visual acuity, tonometry, optic nerve assessment, and other routine glaucoma tests) from teleglaucoma and from physical presence will be compared. The accuracy of glaucoma diagnosis (no glaucoma, glaucoma suspect, confirmed Glaucoma) and management recommendations will also be compared. Parameters to be studied will include comparisons of LogMAR visual acuity, tonometry, ocular examination and particularly optic nerve evaluation (estimation of vertical and horizontal cup-to-disc ratio, presence of signs of glaucomatous neuropathy: disc hemorrhage, notching, localized pallor, and asymmetry in cup-to-disc ratio of the two eyes >0.2 disc diameters, among others). Limitations to an adequate ocular examination or imaging during teleglaucoma and physical presence will be tracked. Inter-observer agreement between the two arms (teleglaucoma and physical presence) will be determined.
The accuracy of glaucoma diagnosis, i.e., confirmed glaucoma, glaucoma suspect, no glaucoma, as well as management recommendations, i.e., monitoring care, therapeutic interventions, obtained via teleglaucoma and physical presence will be compared. Statistical analyses will be performed on collected data. All data will be collected by subject codes. No protected health information will be gathered. Statistical analysis will be performed using statistical software through consultation with a statistician.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Prospective sequential enrolment in teleglaucoma then conventional glaucoma clinical care
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Tele-Glaucoma arm | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: TeleglaucomaSubjects enrolled in tele-glaucoma arm for remote assessment |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Adult patients with glaucoma or who are glaucoma suspects
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Physical limitations precluding image acquisition like the inability to position for imaging or the inability to acquire images/testing
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TeleglaucomaAlso: teleophthalmologySubjects are evaluated through a teleglaucoma protocol then by physical presence in a glaucoma clinic | Diagnostic test | Tele-Glaucoma arm |
Primary outcome
Comparison of diagnosis and management in Teleglaucoma and conventional care
Time frame: 24 months
Qualitative categorical outcome: Glaucoma Diagnosis, Management and follow up are clinical determinations by the investigator that are based on the overall clinical evaluation of the subject Diagnosis: A. no glaucoma B. confirmed glaucoma Management: A. maintain current therapy, B. advance therapy (additional glaucoma medication or surgical glaucoma intervention), C. no therapy needed Follow up: A. urgent (less than 4 weeks from time of evaluation) B. routine (more than 4 weeks from time of evaluation)
4 secondary outcomes
Assessment of diagnostic tools during teleglaucoma: Visual acuity
Time frame: 12 months
Assessment of diagnostic tools during teleglaucoma: Tonometry
Time frame: 12 months
Assessment of diagnostic tools during tele glaucoma: Optic nerve
Time frame: 12 months
Assessment of diagnostic tools during tele glaucoma: Optical Coherence Tomography
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Aug 2021.
- Background: PubMed 31138016Chandrasekaran S, Kass W, Thangamathesvaran L, Mendez N, Khouri P, Szirth BC, Khouri AS. Tele-glaucoma versus clinical evaluation: The New Jersey Health Foundation Prospective Clinical Study. J Telemed Telecare. 2020 Oct;26(9):536-544. doi: 10.1177/1357633X19845273. Epub 2019 May 28.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Albert S Khouri, MD principal investigator
Rutgers University
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Teleglaucoma in people with Teleglaucoma and Teleophthalmology, run by Rutgers University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Aug 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Comparison of diagnosis and management in Teleglaucoma and conventional care (time frame: 24 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03587454, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Aug 2021; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.