AzTrials
AzTrials

Cataract SurgeryNCT03587909

FLACS vs Phaco in Shallow Anterior Chamber

A study testing Phacoemulsification Cataract SUrgery and Femtosecond Cataract Surgery in people with Cataract Surgery and Shallow Anterior Chamber, run by Iladevi Cataract and IOL Research Center at 1 site in India.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Phacoemulsification in eyes with a shallow anterior chamber (ACD < 2.2mm) presents with problems of safe access to the cataract and increased vulnerability of the endothelium and a higher tendency of complications such as descemet's detachment and iris prolapse. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 30 to 100 years
What is being tested?
Phacoemulsification Cataract SUrgery and Femtosecond Cataract Surgery
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
91 participants
Where
1 siteIndia
Study dates
1 Jan 2017to 15 Jan 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 30 to 100 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • uncomplicated, age related cataracts
  • Shallow anterior chamber (measured as </=2.5mm )

Who cannot join

  • Coexisting ocular morbidity,
  • inability to come for followup

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

India1 site
  • Iladevi Cataract & IOL Research Center

    Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 380052

Other trials in India

About this study

Official title: Intraoperative Performance and Postoperative Outcomes Following Femtosecond Laser Assisted Cataract Surgery (FLACS) and Manual Phacoemulsification in Eyes With Shallow Anterior Chamber

Phacoemulsification in eyes with a shallow anterior chamber (ACD < 2.2mm) presents with problems of safe access to the cataract and increased vulnerability of the endothelium and a higher tendency of complications such as descemet's detachment and iris prolapse. A shallow anterior chamber is also responsible for the high incidence of glaucoma and postoperative complications after cataract surgery. Femtosecond assisted cataract surgery has made cataract surgery safer and more predictable. The effective phacoemulsification time and intra-operative manipulation is greatly reduced in FLACS. However phacoemulsification still remains the most widely performed cataract surgery around the world. Post-operative outcomes after phacoemulsification in patients having shallow anterior chamber have been extensively reported in literature over the years.

There is no head to head comparison in terms of intraoperative performance and post-operative outcomes between FLACS and phacoemulsification in eyes with shallow anterior chamber.

Read more

The aim is to compare the intra-operative performance and post-operative outcomes in eyes undergoing femtosecond laser assisted cataract surgery versus eyes undergoing phacoemulsification in eyes having shallow anterior chamber.

The study will bring an understanding on the question: Do patients undergoing Femtosecond laser assisted cataract surgery behave differently from those undergoing phacoemulsification?

Read the detailed description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age-related cataract
  • Shallow Anterior Chamber (<2.5mm)

Exclusion Criteria:

-Ocular co-morbidity - corneal disorders, glaucoma, uveitis, previous ocular surgery

Surgical Technique :

  • Standardized, Single Surgeon
  • 2.2 mm clear corneal temporal incision
  • FLACS Group : Capsulorhexis, Lens Fragmentation with femto laser

The investigators will be evaluating the following parameters:

  1. Primary outcome measure Corneal thickness on day 1, week 1 and 1 month (Change in corneal thickness of 15% from preop. will be considered significant).
  2. Secondary outcome measures
  • Corneal clarity -on day 1, week 1 and 1 month postoperatively
  • Anterior chamber cells and flare (Hogan's criteria)
  • Percentage change in endothelial cell density from preoperatively to 3 months postoperatively
  • Unaided visual acuity (distance) on day 1 and 1 month.
  • Best corrected distance visual acuity 1 month postoperatively
  1. Other Observations :
  2. Cumulative Dissipated Energy (CDE) 2) Surgical time 3) Fluid used 4) Descemets membrane detachment during surgery 5) Incidence of iris trauma 6) Any other intra-operative complications
Being tested
Phacoemulsification Cataract SUrgery, Femtosecond Cataract Surgery
Keywords
FLACS, Phaco, Shallow Anterior Chamber

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Phacoemulsification Cataract SUrgeryProcedure or surgery

    Phacoemulsification in eyes with shallow anterior chamber (<2.5mm depth)

  • Femtosecond Cataract SurgeryProcedure or surgery

    Femtosecond Cataract Surgery in eyes with shallow anterior chamber < 2.5mm

Study groups in NCT03587909
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Phacoemulsification Cataract SurgeryActive comparatorProcedure / Surgery : Phacoemulsification Surgery
Receives: Procedure: Phacoemulsification Cataract SUrgery
Femtosecond Cataract SurgeryActive comparatorProcedure / SUrgery - Femtosecond Laser Cataract surgery
Receives: Procedure: Femtosecond Cataract Surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Central Corneal Thickness

    Central Corneal Thickness

    Measured: Postoperative Day 1

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Anterior Chamber Inflammation

    Anterior chamber cells and flare (Hogan's criteria)

    Measured: Postoperative Day 1

  2. Endothelial Cell Morphology

    Endothelial Cell Density

    Measured: Postoperative 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Jul 2018
  2. Study start1 Jan 2017
  3. Primary completion1 Dec 2017
  4. Study completion15 Jan 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
91 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03587909
Sponsor's protocol ID
FLACS1
Status last verified
Jul 2018
First submitted
11 Jun 2018
Last updated
16 Jul 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Hung SH, Lan CH, Yao YH, Chiu TH, Lu DW, Chen YG, Yen WT. FLACS vs phacoemulsification in shallow anterior chambers: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2026 Sep 11. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000002062. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 42725767

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Phacoemulsification Cataract SUrgery and Femtosecond Cataract Surgery in people with Cataract Surgery and Shallow Anterior Chamber, run by Iladevi Cataract and IOL Research Center at 1 site in India.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Central Corneal Thickness (time frame: Postoperative Day 1). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03587909, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jul 2018; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 2 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in