Neuroendocrine TumorsPhase 2/3LUTIANCT03590119
Intra-arterial Lutetium-177-dotatate for Treatment of Patients With Neuro-endocrine Tumor Liver Metastases
A Phase 2/3 study testing Lutetium Lu 177-DOTATATE in people with Neuroendocrine Tumors and Liver Metastases, run by Marnix Lam at 3 sites in Netherlands.
Trial summary
The objective is to investigate the impact of intra-arterial administration of 177Lu-dotatate on the intrahepatic biodistribution in patients with NET liver metastases. Our primary objective is to evaluate if there is a difference in post-treatment tumor-to-non-tumor (T/N) activity concentration ratio on SPECT/CT… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Neuroendocrine Tumors, Liver Metastases
- What is being tested?
- Lutetium Lu 177-DOTATATE
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 26 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesNetherlands
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2018to 1 Sep 2022
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients must have given written informed consent.
- Female or male aged 18 years and over.
- Inoperable histologically proven neuro-endocrine tumor with indication for 177Lu-dotatate at enrollment time.
- Well-differentiated neuro-endocrine tumor with a Ki67-index ≤20% and a mitotic count of ≤20.
- Confirmed presence of somatostatin receptors on target lesions, based on somatostatin receptor imaging.
- Life expectancy of 6 months or longer.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score 0-1.
- Hepatic metastases with at least one lesion ≥3 cm on cross sectional imaging in both the right and left liver lobe (i.e. left and right lobes are based on the hepatic arterial perfusion territory).
- Presence of excessive liver metastases, defined as >25% tumor load, with or without extrahepatic metastases.
- Patients must have clinical or radiological progressive disease.
- Negative pregnancy test for women of childbearing potential.
Who cannot join
- Any previous radioembolization, chemoembolization, or bland embolization, at any time, or surgery or radiofrequency ablation (or other ablative therapies) within 12 weeks prior to randomization in the study.
- Prior external beam radiation therapy to the liver.
- Interferons, Everolimus (mTOR-inhibitors) or other systemic therapies within 4 weeks prior to randomization in the study.
- Any patient receiving treatment with short-acting Octreotide, which cannot be interrupted for 24 hours before and 24 hours after the administration of 177Lu-dotatate, or any patient receiving treatment with Octreotide LAR, which cannot be interrupted for at least 4 weeks before the administration of 177Lu-dotatate, unless the tumor uptake on target lesions observed by imaging during continued Octreotide LAR treatment is higher than normal liver uptake.
- Any unresolved toxicity greater than National Cancer Institute (NCI), Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE version 4.03) grade 2 from previous anti-cancer therapy.
- Serum bilirubin > Upper Limit of Normal (ULN), serum albumin <3.0 g/dL.
Show all 18Show fewer
- Glomerular filtration rate <50 ml/min.
- Hb <5.5 mmol/L; leucocytes <3.0x109/L; platelets <100x109/L (at baseline; 75x109/L is sufficient for cycles 2-4).
- Uncontrolled congestive heart failure (NYHA II, III, IV).
- Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus.
- Patients suffering from diseases with an increased chance of liver toxicity.
- Patients suffering from psychic disorders that make a comprehensive judgement impossible, such as psychosis, hallucinations and/or depression. Patients who are declared incompetent.
- Previous enrolment in the present study or previous treatment with 177Lu-dotatate.
- Female patients who are not using an acceptable method of contraception (oral contraceptives, barrier methods, approved contraceptive implant, long-term injectable contraception, intrauterine device or tubal ligation) OR are less than 1 year postmenopausal or surgically sterile during their participation in this study (from the time they sign the consent form) to prevent pregnancy.
- Male patients who are not surgically sterile or do not use an acceptable method of contraception during their participation in this study (from the time they sign the consent form) to prevent pregnancy in a partner.
- Body weight over 150 kg.
- Current spontaneous urinary incontinence.
- Severe allergy for i.v. contrast (Visipaque®), used for CT evaluation and treatment angiography.
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
Netherlands3 sites
Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Cancer Institute
Amsterdam
Erasmus MC
Rotterdam
University Medical Center Utrecht
Utrecht
About this study
The objective is to investigate the impact of intra-arterial administration of 177Lu-dotatate on the intrahepatic biodistribution in patients with NET liver metastases. Our primary objective is to evaluate if there is a difference in post-treatment tumor-to-non-tumor (T/N) activity concentration ratio on SPECT/CT between the intra-arterial treated liver lobe and the intravenous treated liver lobe.
Read the detailed description
Rationale: The majority of neuroendocrine tumor (NET) patients present with metastases, most often including liver metastases. These patients have a poorer prognosis and lower quality of life.
Currently, intravenous administered somatostatin-bound radionuclides (177Lu-dotatate) have shown to improve tumor response rates and progression free survival (PFS). Despite of the increased tumor response rate and PFS, liver metastases still remain the major cause of morbidity and mortality in these patients. Patients with liver metastases have a worse outcome in terms of overall survival after treatment with 177Lu-dotatate compared to patients with limited or no liver metastases.
Objective: to investigate the impact of intra-arterial (IA) administration of 177Lu-dotatate on the intrahepatic biodistribution in patients with NET liver metastases. Our primary objective is to evaluate if there is a difference in post-treatment tumor-to-non-tumor (T/N) activity concentration ratio on SPECT/CT between the intra-arterial treated liver lobe and the intravenous treated liver lobe.
Study design: Multicenter, interventional, block randomized, phase 2 clinical trial. We use a within-subject controlled design where the administration of 177Lu-dotatate is randomized between the right or left hepatic artery. Selective IA administration of 177Lu-dotatate allows for intra-patient comparison between IA administration (one lobe) versus IV 'administration' (the other lobe). The contralateral liver lobe and the rest of the body receive treatment by second pass IV route.
Study population: 26 patients with NET liver metastases (> 18 years old). Intervention: Treatment will be randomized between selective right or left hepatic artery administration of 177Lu-dotatate (Four administrations of 7.4 GBq; each via the same randomly allocated hepatic artery during angiography).
Main study parameters/endpoints: To assess if there is a difference in post-treatment tumor-to-non-tumor (T/N) activity concentration ratio on SPECT/CT between the intra-arterial treated liver lobe and the intravenous treated liver lobe. The T/N activity concentration will be measured on SPECT/CT. The primary endpoint will be assessed after the first treatment cycle. The T/N activity ratios of the second, third, and final treatment cycle will be assessed as secondary endpoint. Tumor response, toxicity, extrahepatic uptake and kidney uptake are secondary endpoints. Intra- and inter-patient differences will be studied.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: As with the standard IV treatment with 177Lu-dotatate, the treatment consists of four cycles. During each cycle, patients will be admitted for 1 night and undergo physical examination, laboratory examination, angiography with administration of the treatment dose, and post-treatment imaging. Risks include standard complication risks related to angiography (bleeding or infection). No additional risks with relation to the treatment itself are expected compared to the standard IV treatment (nausea, vomiting).
- Conditions
- Neuroendocrine Tumors, Liver Metastases
- Being tested
- Lutetium Lu 177-DOTATATE
- Keywords
- LUTIA, neuroendocrine tumor, lutetium-177-dotatate, intra-arterial, liver metastases
- Medical subject headings
- Neuroendocrine Tumors
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Lutetium Lu 177-DOTATATEDrug
Also called Lutathera
Intra-arterial infusion of Lu-177-DOTATATE
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intra-arterially treated liver lobe | Experimental | Depending on the allocation after randomization, Lu-177-dotatate will be infused in either the left or the right hepatic artery, following catheterization using the Seldinger-technique. Receives: Drug: Lutetium Lu 177-DOTATATE |
| 'Intravenously' treated liver lobe | Active comparator | The lobe that is not treated intra-arterially, will act as the intravenously treated lobe, due to the first-pass effect. Receives: Drug: Lutetium Lu 177-DOTATATE |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The difference in post-treatment tumor-to-non-tumor (T/N) activity concentration ratio on SPECT/CT between the intra-arterial treated liver lobe and the intravenous treated liver lobe.
To assess if there is a difference in post-treatment tumor-to-non-tumor (T/N) activity concentration ratio on SPECT/CT between the intra-arterial treated liver lobe and the intravenous treated liver lobe. The T/N activity concentration will be measured on SPECT/CT. The primary endpoint will be assessed after the first treatment cycle. For each liver lobe up to three tumors (i.e. all >3 cm) will be selected based on size (i.e. the largest lesions without central necrosis). The weighted average activity per voxel of these lesions will be divided by the normal liver tissue mean activity per voxel (i.e. a VOI with 3 cm diameter will be placed in the normal liver tissue) to calculate the T/N ratio. The T/N activity ratios of the second, third, and final treatment cycle will be assessed as secondary endpoint. Intra- and inter-patient differences will be studied.
Measured: 24 hours
Secondary outcomes (7)
The difference in absolute values of mean tumor and healthy liver absorbed dose on post-treatment SPECT/CT between the intra-arterial treated liver lobe and the intravenous treated liver lobe
Difference in absolute values of mean tumor and healthy liver absorbed dose (in Gy) on post-treatment SPECT/CT between the intra-arterial treated liver lobe and the intravenous treated liver lobe: Dosimetry will be performed to measure mean tumor and healthy liver absorbed dose. Dosimetry will be performed on post-treatment SPECT/CT, which is performed 24 hours after administration of 177Lu-dotatate. The absolute absorbed dose in the IA treated liver lobe will be compared to the IV treated lobe.
Measured: 24 hours
The difference in post-treatment tumor response between the intra-arterial treated liver lobe and the intravenous treated liver lobe
-Difference in post-treatment tumor response between the intra-arterial treated liver lobe and the intravenous treated liver lobe: The tumors are measured on CT and scored according to the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) solid tumor response criteria, RECIST 1.1, and mRECIST criteria. Scoring systems will be applied on the patient and liver level, separately.
Because the eventual maximal shrinkage of the tumors may take months after completion of the therapy, we added the tumor response class 'minimal response (MR)', pertaining to a decrease in summed squares of tumor diameter more than 25% but less than 50%.
Measured: 3 and 6 months
The dose-response relation between tumor absorbed dose and post-treatment tumor response
To assess if there is a dose-response relation between tumor absorbed dose and post-treatment tumor response: The tumor absorbed dose in both the IA and IV treated liver lobe will be calculated based on SPECT/CT as mentioned above. Tumor response will be measured on post-treatment follow-up imaging. With these parameters, a possible dose-response relation will be evaluated.
Measured: 3 and 6 months
Toxicity and how toxicity is compared to historical controls
To assess safety and toxicity according to the common toxicity criteria on adverse events (CTCAE) version 4.03. The grade of toxicity refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE displays Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE. Especially myelo-toxicity, renal toxicity and hepatic toxicity will be evaluated.
Measured: 6 months
Sufficient uptake of 177Lu-dotatate in extrahepatic lesions
To assess if there is sufficient uptake of 177Lu-dotatate in extrahepatic lesions (comparison will be made with historical data): The 177Lu-dotatate uptake of the extrahepatic lesions (e.g. pancreas, intestine) will be calculated on post-treatment SPECT/CT. These results will be compared to historical data in order to evaluate if these extrahepatic tumor sites show sufficient uptake.
Measured: 24 hours
Sufficient uptake of 177Lu-dotatate in the contralateral lobe, compared to historical controls
To assess if there is sufficient uptake of 177Lu-dotatate in the contralateral lobe (comparison will be made with historical data): The 177Lu-dotatate uptake of the contralateral lobe will be calculated on post-treatment SPECT/CT. These results will be compared to historical data in order to evaluate if the other lobe shows sufficient uptake.
Measured: 24 hours
The difference in kidney uptake of 177Lu-dotatate between the IA treated patients and historical controls
To assess if there is a difference in kidney uptake of 177Lu-dotate between the IA treated patients and historical controls: Kidney uptake will be calculated on post-treatment SPECT/CT and compared to historical controls in order to assess differences in uptake.
Measured: 24 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Jul 2018
- Study start1 Aug 2018
- Primary completion1 Sep 2022
- Study completion1 Sep 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Neuroendocrine TumorsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This study uses a with-in subject randomization between intra-arterial treatment via the left or right hepatic artery.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 26 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Marnix Lam
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Marnix Lam, UMC Utrecht
- Investigators
- Marnix GEH Lam, MD PhD, Principal investigator, UMC Utrecht
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03590119
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NL60725.041.17
- Acronym
- LUTIA
- Status last verified
- Nov 2022
- First submitted
- 3 Jul 2018
- Last updated
- 8 Nov 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Ebbers SC, Braat AJAT, Moelker A, Stokkel MPM, Lam MGEH, Barentsz MW. Intra-arterial versus standard intravenous administration of lutetium-177-DOTA-octreotate in patients with NET liver metastases: study protocol for a multicenter, randomized controlled trial (LUTIA trial). Trials. 2020 Feb 5;21(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3888-0.
PubMed 32024533
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Nov 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Intra-arterial Lutetium-177-dotatate for Treatment of Patients With Neuro-endocrine Tumor Liver Metastases
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03590119
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LUTIA / NL60725.041.17
- Conditions
- Neuroendocrine Tumors, Liver Metastases
- Keywords
- LUTIA, neuroendocrine tumor, lutetium-177-dotatate, intra-arterial, liver metastases
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 26 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Marnix LamUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Sep 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Sep 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective is to investigate the impact of intra-arterial administration of 177Lu-dotatate on the intrahepatic biodistribution in patients with NET liver metastases. Our primary objective is to evaluate if there is a difference in post-treatment tumor-to-non-tumor (T/N) activity concentration ratio on SPECT/CT between the intra-arterial treated liver lobe and the intravenous treated liver lobe.
Detailed description
Rationale: The majority of neuroendocrine tumor (NET) patients present with metastases, most often including liver metastases. These patients have a poorer prognosis and lower quality of life.
Currently, intravenous administered somatostatin-bound radionuclides (177Lu-dotatate) have shown to improve tumor response rates and progression free survival (PFS). Despite of the increased tumor response rate and PFS, liver metastases still remain the major cause of morbidity and mortality in these patients. Patients with liver metastases have a worse outcome in terms of overall survival after treatment with 177Lu-dotatate compared to patients with limited or no liver metastases.
Objective: to investigate the impact of intra-arterial (IA) administration of 177Lu-dotatate on the intrahepatic biodistribution in patients with NET liver metastases. Our primary objective is to evaluate if there is a difference in post-treatment tumor-to-non-tumor (T/N) activity concentration ratio on SPECT/CT between the intra-arterial treated liver lobe and the intravenous treated liver lobe.
Study design: Multicenter, interventional, block randomized, phase 2 clinical trial. We use a within-subject controlled design where the administration of 177Lu-dotatate is randomized between the right or left hepatic artery. Selective IA administration of 177Lu-dotatate allows for intra-patient comparison between IA administration (one lobe) versus IV 'administration' (the other lobe). The contralateral liver lobe and the rest of the body receive treatment by second pass IV route.
Study population: 26 patients with NET liver metastases (> 18 years old). Intervention: Treatment will be randomized between selective right or left hepatic artery administration of 177Lu-dotatate (Four administrations of 7.4 GBq; each via the same randomly allocated hepatic artery during angiography).
Main study parameters/endpoints: To assess if there is a difference in post-treatment tumor-to-non-tumor (T/N) activity concentration ratio on SPECT/CT between the intra-arterial treated liver lobe and the intravenous treated liver lobe. The T/N activity concentration will be measured on SPECT/CT. The primary endpoint will be assessed after the first treatment cycle. The T/N activity ratios of the second, third, and final treatment cycle will be assessed as secondary endpoint. Tumor response, toxicity, extrahepatic uptake and kidney uptake are secondary endpoints. Intra- and inter-patient differences will be studied.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: As with the standard IV treatment with 177Lu-dotatate, the treatment consists of four cycles. During each cycle, patients will be admitted for 1 night and undergo physical examination, laboratory examination, angiography with administration of the treatment dose, and post-treatment imaging. Risks include standard complication risks related to angiography (bleeding or infection). No additional risks with relation to the treatment itself are expected compared to the standard IV treatment (nausea, vomiting).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This study uses a with-in subject randomization between intra-arterial treatment via the left or right hepatic artery.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intra-arterially treated liver lobe | Experimental | Drug: Lutetium Lu 177-DOTATATEDepending on the allocation after randomization, Lu-177-dotatate will be infused in either the left or the right hepatic artery, following catheterization using the Seldinger-technique. |
| 'Intravenously' treated liver lobe | Active comparator | Drug: Lutetium Lu 177-DOTATATEThe lobe that is not treated intra-arterially, will act as the intravenously treated lobe, due to the first-pass effect. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Patients must have given written informed consent.
- Female or male aged 18 years and over.
- Inoperable histologically proven neuro-endocrine tumor with indication for 177Lu-dotatate at enrollment time.
- Well-differentiated neuro-endocrine tumor with a Ki67-index ≤20% and a mitotic count of ≤20.
- Confirmed presence of somatostatin receptors on target lesions, based on somatostatin receptor imaging.
Key exclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Any previous radioembolization, chemoembolization, or bland embolization, at any time, or surgery or radiofrequency ablation (or other ablative therapies) within 12 weeks prior to randomization in the study.
- Prior external beam radiation therapy to the liver.
- Interferons, Everolimus (mTOR-inhibitors) or other systemic therapies within 4 weeks prior to randomization in the study.
- Any patient receiving treatment with short-acting Octreotide, which cannot be interrupted for 24 hours before and 24 hours after the administration of 177Lu-dotatate, or any patient receiving treatment with Octreotide LAR, which cannot be interrupted for at least 4 weeks before the administration of 177Lu-dotatate, unless the tumor uptake on target lesions observed by imaging during continued Octreotide LAR treatment is higher than normal liver uptake.
- Any unresolved toxicity greater than National Cancer Institute (NCI), Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE version 4.03) grade 2 from previous anti-cancer therapy.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Lutetium Lu 177-DOTATATEAlso: LutatheraIntra-arterial infusion of Lu-177-DOTATATE | Drug | 'Intravenously' treated liver lobe, Intra-arterially treated liver lobe |
Primary outcome
The difference in post-treatment tumor-to-non-tumor (T/N) activity concentration ratio on SPECT/CT between the intra-arterial treated liver lobe and the intravenous treated liver lobe.
Time frame: 24 hours
To assess if there is a difference in post-treatment tumor-to-non-tumor (T/N) activity concentration ratio on SPECT/CT between the intra-arterial treated liver lobe and the intravenous treated liver lobe. The T/N activity concentration will be measured on SPECT/CT. The primary endpoint will be assessed after the first treatment cycle. For each liver lobe up to three tumors (i.e. all >3 cm) will be selected based on size (i.e. the largest lesions without central necrosis). The weighted average activity per voxel of these lesions will be divided by the normal liver tissue mean activity per voxel (i.e. a VOI with 3 cm diameter will be placed in the normal liver tissue) to calculate the T/N ratio. The T/N activity ratios of the second, third, and final treatment cycle will be assessed as secondary endpoint. Intra- and inter-patient differences will be studied.
7 secondary outcomes
The difference in absolute values of mean tumor and healthy liver absorbed dose on post-treatment SPECT/CT between the intra-arterial treated liver lobe and the intravenous treated liver lobe
Time frame: 24 hours
The difference in post-treatment tumor response between the intra-arterial treated liver lobe and the intravenous treated liver lobe
Time frame: 3 and 6 months
The dose-response relation between tumor absorbed dose and post-treatment tumor response
Time frame: 3 and 6 months
Toxicity and how toxicity is compared to historical controls
Time frame: 6 months
Sufficient uptake of 177Lu-dotatate in extrahepatic lesions
Time frame: 24 hours
Sufficient uptake of 177Lu-dotatate in the contralateral lobe, compared to historical controls
Time frame: 24 hours
The difference in kidney uptake of 177Lu-dotatate between the IA treated patients and historical controls
Time frame: 24 hours
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Nov 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32024533Ebbers SC, Braat AJAT, Moelker A, Stokkel MPM, Lam MGEH, Barentsz MW. Intra-arterial versus standard intravenous administration of lutetium-177-DOTA-octreotate in patients with NET liver metastases: study protocol for a multicenter, randomized controlled trial (LUTIA trial). Trials. 2020 Feb 5;21(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3888-0.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Neuroendocrine Tumors
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
IL-17 Blockade to Decrease irAEs (REPLAY)
Metastatic Melanoma
RecruitingPhase 2
A UGT1A1 Genotype-Directed Study of Belinostat Pharmacokinetics and Toxicity
Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine, Tumor, Neuroendocrine
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 3
Somatostatin Analogues vs. Observation After Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) in Nonfunctional Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
Neuroendocrine Neoplasm, Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Marnix GEH Lam, MD PhD principal investigator
UMC Utrecht
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Lutetium Lu 177-DOTATATE in people with Neuroendocrine Tumors and Liver Metastases, run by Marnix Lam at 3 sites in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Nov 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The difference in post-treatment tumor-to-non-tumor (T/N) activity concentration ratio on SPECT/CT between the intra-arterial treated liver lobe and the intravenous treated liver lobe. (time frame: 24 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03590119, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Nov 2022.