AzTrials
AzTrials

Negative Therapy ExpectationNCT03594903

Maintenance (vs. Change) of Critical Attitudes Towards Psychotherapy

A study testing video intervention (therapy expectation violation) and video intervention (symptoms+ expectation) in people with Negative Therapy Expectation, run by Philipps University Marburg.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a video intervention, which was designed to improve therapy expectation of persons with critical attitudes towards psychotherapy via violating their expectations about therapy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Negative Therapy Expectation
What is being tested?
video intervention (therapy expectation violation) and video intervention (symptoms+ expectation)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
120 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Nov 2018to Jan 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age: 18 years or older
  • Critical attitude towards psychotherapy (self-selection)
  • ability to speak and read German
  • access to the internet

Who cannot join

  • known major mental disorder, such as schizophrenia or another psychotic disorder, or drug or alcohol addiction or dementia (based on self-report)
  • medication that influences cognitive processes substantially (benzodiazepine)

About this study

The aim of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a video intervention, which was designed to improve therapy expectation of persons with critical attitudes towards psychotherapy via violating their expectations about therapy. Therefore, 120 participants will be recruited and randomized to two groups:

(1) An experimental group that is watching a video with patients (actors) that are giving oral information about their therapy and the mostly positive therapy outcome, (2) a control group that is watching a video with the same patients before therapy or after the first therapy session who are giving information about symptoms and their expectation on therapy. The primary outcome is the Milwaukee Psychotherapy Expectation Questionnaire (MPEQ) collected before and after the video.

Read the detailed description

Therapy expectation is one of the main predictors of therapy outcome. This could be shown through many results in the medical sector as well as in studies that are focusing on psychotherapeutic interventions across different mental disorders. Although psychotherapy is a successful treatment for many disorders it is still hold in low esteem by some parts of the population and from some patient groups in particular. This can cause (that) patients who are in need of treatment not being recommended to the right therapy. Furthermore patients with low therapy expectation are more likely to (prematurely) abandon their therapy or having a lower therapy outcome. So therapy expectation should definitely be addressed in the very first therapy sessions because of it´s high impact.

The Violex-model gives an overview on how expectations in general are developed, maintained or modified. The model postulates that a process called immunization can lead to maintenance of expectation even if they receive information that contradicts their expectation. However no trial has yet examined weather the suggestions of the model are adaptable to therapy expectation. Therefore the investigators are recruiting participants with critical attitudes towards psychotherapy and trying to provoke expectation violation via an online experiment containing videos with patients reporting about their mostly positive outcome of psychotherapy. A control group is watching a video with patients who are just giving information about their symptoms and their first impressions on psychotherapy. The primary outcome is the Milwaukee Psychotherapy Expectation Questionnaire (MPEQ) collected before and after the video. Furthermore the participants are asked about their attitudes towards psychotherapeutic treatment (QAPT, German Version FEP), their own experience with psychotherapy and experiences of relevant others, behavioral intensions towards seeking psychotherapy, their mental wellbeing and demographic data. Before watching the video participants are also asked to formulate one to three individual expectations on psychotherapy. After watching the video they are asked how much they still believe in their individual expectation.

The investigators are aiming to modify low therapy expectation by generating expectation violation and paying particular attention to the issue of persistence of expectations via having a closer look on possible immunization strategies. For doing so they developed immunization items (data- and construct-orientated) that are shown at the end of the experiment.

Being tested
video intervention (therapy expectation violation), video intervention (symptoms+ expectation)
Keywords
therapy expectation, therapy motivation, critical attitudes towards psychotherapy, expectation violation, Violex model, psychological online-experiment

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • video intervention (therapy expectation violation)Behavioural

    The investigators asked experts (psychotherapist and scientists in the area of clinical psychology) about typical therapy expectation violations in therapy and searched the literature for information about typical therapy processes and outcomes. Having these information they designed a script for the experimental video. The patients in the video are played by actors aged from 28 to 58 years (two male and two female actors). Patients are representing common mental disorders (depression, anxiety disorder, alcohol addiction, depression after physical disease). The abbreviated name, age and disorder of the patients is displayed for 3 seconds in the video. The patients are giving information about the mostly positive outcome and the process of their therapy. All participants are watching a video with all patients (7 minutes). The videos (control and experimental group) have been evaluated by 12 experts (psychotherapist and scientists in the area of clinical psychology).

  • video intervention (symptoms+ expectation)Behavioural

    Participants in the control group are watching a video with the same patients (actors) as in the experimental video. In this video patients are shown before or after the first therapy session. They are giving information about symptoms and their expectation on therapy but NOT about therapy outcome.

Study groups in NCT03594903
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Expectation violation (positive outcome of therapy)ExperimentalExperimental: patients' report about therapy outcome Video with patients giving information about (mostly) positive therapy outcome
Receives: Behavioral: video intervention (therapy expectation violation)
Control group (symptoms + expectation)OtherControl group: patient´s report about symptoms and therapy expectations Participants in the control group are watching a video with the same patients (actors) as in the experimental video. In this video patients are shown before or after the first therapy session. They are giving information about symptoms and their expectation on therapy but NOT about therapy outcome.
Receives: Behavioral: video intervention (symptoms+ expectation)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Milwaukee Expectation Questionnaire (MPEQ)

    Therapy expectation measured by the Milwaukee Expectation Questionnaire (MPEQ) - 13 items, German translation, self-report, subscales: process expectation and outcome expectation, total mean from min. 0 to max.10.

    Measured: changes from baseline to after watching the video (approx. 20 minutes later)

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. FEP/ QAPT

    Self-report measure of attitudes towards psychotherapeutic treatments FEP (Fragebogen zu Einstellungen gegenüber der Inanspruchnahme psychotherapeutischer Hilfe) / Attitudes towards Psychotherapeutic Treatment (QAPT); total score from min. 11 to max. 44

    Measured: changes from baseline to after watching the video (approx. 20 minutes later)

  2. Self-report of individual expectations towards psychotherapy; mean from min. 1 to max. 7

    Measured: changes from baseline to after watching the video (approx. 20 minutes later)

  3. Self-report of behavioral intensions towards seeking psychotherapy (self-developed items); mean from min. 1 to max.7

    Measured: changes from baseline to after watching the video (approx. 20 minutes later)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Jul 2018
  2. Study startNov 2018 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionJan 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJan 2019 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
participants are assigned to one of two groups in parallel for the duration of the study
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
120 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03594903
Sponsor's protocol ID
2018-19k
Status last verified
Nov 2018
First submitted
5 Jul 2018
Last updated
8 Nov 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Braun-Koch K, Rief W. Maintenance vs. Change of Negative Therapy Expectation: An Experimental Investigation Using Video Samples. Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 4;13:836227. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.836227. eCollection 2022.

    PubMed 35444567

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing video intervention (therapy expectation violation) and video intervention (symptoms+ expectation) in people with Negative Therapy Expectation, run by Philipps University Marburg.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Nov 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Milwaukee Expectation Questionnaire (MPEQ) (time frame: changes from baseline to after watching the video (approx. 20 minutes later)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03594903, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Nov 2018; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in