OncologyNCT03597737
Utility of an APP for the Monitoring of Irruptive Oncological Pain
A study testing Pain APP in people with Oncology and Pain, Acute, run by Universitat Jaume I at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
The present investigation aims at exploring the effect of including a pain app called Pain Monitor irruptive oncological pain for chronic pain patients' daily monitoring. Two conditions will be set: 1. usual treatment (waiting list) 2. usual treatment + APP Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Oncology, Pain, Acute, Pain, Chronic
- What is being tested?
- Pain APP
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 21 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 10 Aug 2018to 29 Nov 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The patient is over 18 years of age
- Irruptive oncological pain
- The patient has a mobile phone with Android operating system
- The patient has the physical ability to use the application
- The patient does not present psychological and / or cognitive alterations or problems with language that make their participation difficult- The patient voluntarily wants to participate and signs the informed consent
Who cannot join
- The patient is under 18 years
- The patient does not have a mobile phone or has a mobile phone in which Android is not the operating system (the app is currently only available for Android for economic reasons)
- The patient does not have the physical capacity to use the application
- The patient does not have the capacity to participate due to psychological and / or cognitive alterations or problems with language
- The patient does not want to participate
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The present investigation aims at exploring the effect of including a pain app called Pain Monitor irruptive oncological pain for chronic pain patients' daily monitoring. Two conditions will be set:
- usual treatment (waiting list)
- usual treatment + APP
Read the detailed description
Irruptive oncological pain (IOP) is defined as an exacerbation of pain in cancer patients whose base pain is stable (e.g., less than 4 on a scale of 0 to 10 for more than 12 hours a day) and is well controlled with opioids. This pain increase can appear both spontaneously and associated to a specific determining factor, be it predictable or unpredictable. The IOP tends to appear quickly (3-5 minutes) and usually have a short duration (average 30 minutes, although pain may last more than 60 minutes) and moderate intensity to elevated . The median episodes of breakthrough pain per day is of 3.
The prevalence of IOP is alarmingly high. A review study of 19 works scientists places the number of cancer patients with IOP in approximately 60%. In addition, the IOP is associated with a significant decrease in the quality of life of the patients. For example, a study conducted in different countries in Europe with 1000 cancer patients revealed that in more than 80% of the participants, the appearance of breakthrough pain completely interrupted their activities. Only 11% of the patients interviewed expressed that the IOP did not interfere in their activities. For the rest of the patients, the most affected areas were sleep and emotional well-being. In addition to these costs in the quality of life of patients with IOP, recent studies have warned of the consequences of this type of pain. Thus, an investigation carried out in the United States evidenced that three quarters of the patients interviewed had experienced important economic losses as a result of the pain, being the average direct costs associated with the IOP of $ 891 per person per month.
Aiming to choose the most appropriate study methodology for this type of pain (often unpredictable and of short duration), the investigators have reviewed the works carried out up to the moment on characteristics and treatment of the IOP. Descriptive studies on IOP tend to use a most retrospective observational methodology, which can lead to biases and inaccuracies. For example, in the most ambitious study carried out so far, 1000 patients with IOP were urged to remember the characteristics of pain episodes, such as the average intensity, the approximate average duration and the average number of events per day.
Regarding the investigations on the effectiveness of the treatment of the IOP, the studies comparing different drugs tend to perform clinical trials, while to study the response to a particular drug, seems more adequate continuous assessment of each patient during an IOP episode. This last methodology with repeated measures seems the most adequate in IOP, since the use of clinical trials with few measures (baseline, post-treatment and follow-up) has the limitation of not allowing daily monitoring of patient's pain episodes.
Although daily assessments seems to be the most suitable design for the monitoring of patients with IOP, the implementation of this type of methodology could be very expensive because requires continuous evaluation. To facilitate this, several studies have already shown that mobile applications (APP) can effectively monitor the evolution of a wide range of pathologies in the context of health. In fact, a controlled clinical study recently made found that the records eco-friendly through mobile APPs were more reliable than registers with pencil and paper.
As for the existing APPs in pain, an exhaustive review of the available APPs revealed that there was little evidence to support the use of these technologies. Specifically, these authors showed that the most APPs did not specify whether their content was validated, APPs did not include psychological components and none had been applied in a clinical study. In the light of these results, the investigators contacted the Labpsitec research team of the University Jaume I, who have developed and validated a pain application called "Pain Monitor".
The APP daily evaluates the variables recommended by the Initiative on Methods, Measurement and Evaluation of Pain (IMMPACT): intensity of the pain, use of rescue analgesics, pain interference in functioning, state of mood, general perception of health and evaluation of treatment effectiveness. In addition, "Pain Monitor" also assesses psychological factors and behavior that influence the experience of pain: catastrophism, acceptance, fear / avoidance and coping. The APP seems especially indicated for IOP monitoring since, following the recommendations of the guide "Comprehensive approach to the patient with irruptive oncological pain", allows patients access at any time to record the characteristics of pain (place, intensity, duration and characteristics of pain) and frequency of use of medication for the spikes of pain. Finally, the APP allows to create alarms so that, undesirable clinical events (e.g., severe or recurrent adverse effect, increased pain basal, no pain reduction after use of rescue medication, low adherence to treatment), are sent by email to the principal investigator of the study.
Thus, the study objective is to test if the introduction of the Pain Monitor APP in the day-to-day work of the pain unit improves pain management of irruptive oncological pain patients. To do this, it is necessary to compare the evolution of patients who follow the usual treatment at the pain unit (without app) with a group of patients who do use the Pain Monitor APP.
The investigators will perform a clinical trial comparing the 2 conditions mentioned above:
- usual treatment (waiting list)
- usual treatment + APP
Therefore, this is a clinical trial without drugs. This is not an observational study since the physicians of patients in the app + alarms condition will be asked to react to an alarm (i.e., if the patient has nausea for 3 consecutive days) by calling the patient and changing the treatment telematically, if necessary, so that the patient can collect the prescription at his primary care center. If the condition APP results in a better treatment of irruptive oncological pain patients, participants of the waiting list will be offered the possibility to use the app at the end of the study.
- Conditions
- Oncology, Pain, Acute, Pain, Chronic
- Being tested
- Pain APP
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms, Acute Pain, Chronic Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Pain APPDevice
pain app Pain Monitor app has been developed by a multidisciplinary pain expert panel, including physicians, psychologists, and nurses. Content has been validated in a previous study and usability has been shown to be excellent.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment as usual + APP | Experimental | Participants at this condition will receive the usual medical treatment for their pain but also they will be monitored daily using the Pain Monitor APP. Alarms will be generated in the face of certain preestablished events. Physicians will be asked to call patients and change/stop treatment if an alarm is received. Receives: Device: Pain APP |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in average pain intensity in the past week assessed by a Numerical Rating Scale in the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form
The Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) will be used to measure average pain intensity. The item has a response range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). Higher scores represent higher pain intensity levels
Measured: Twice (first day of study and 30 days after, at the end of study)
Change in side effects of pain medication
A list of the most frequent side effects of pain medication has been created. Responses are dichotomous (0=did not experience the side effect; 1=experienced the side effect)
Measured: Twice (first day of study and 30 days after, at the end of study)
Secondary outcomes (7)
Change in depression measured by the Sadness scale in the POMS
The Profile of Mood States (POMS) questionnaire will be used to measure mood. The questionnaire includes 30 items that describe how the participant feels. For this outcome depression scale (5 items) will be used. Each item has a response range from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Total score ranges from 0 to 20, higher scores represent a worse outcome
Measured: Twice (first day of study and 30 days after, at the end of study)
Change in anxiety measured by the Tension scale in the POMS
The Profile of Mood States (POMS) questionnaire will be used to measure mood. The questionnaire includes 30 items that describe how the participant feels. For this outcome anxiety scale (5 items) will be used. Each item has a response range from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Total score ranges from 0 to 20, higher scores represent a worse outcome
Measured: Twice (first day of study and 30 days after, at the end of study)
Change in the amount of rescue medication used in the past week
An item exploring the use of rescue medication in the past week has been created. Responses are numerical (the amount of rescue medication is indicated by participants)
Measured: Twice (first day of study and 30 days after, at the end of study)
Change in average interference of pain in functioning in the past week measured by a Numerical Rating Scale in the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form
The Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) will be used to measure pain interference. This questionnaire lists four questions regarding pain intensity and seven regarding pain interference. For this outcome pain interference items will be used. Each item has a response range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). Total score ranges from 0 to 70, higher scores represent a worse outcome
Measured: Twice (first day of study and 30 days after, at the end of study)
Change in physical health status measured with the Physical Composite Score in the SF12
12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) will be used to measure quality of life. This is a questionnaire composed of two scales: physical and mental health. Each scale has a 0-100 range, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life
Measured: Twice (first day of study and 30 days after, at the end of study)
Change in mental health status measured with the Mental Composite Score in the SF12
12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) will be used to measure quality of life. This is a questionnaire composed of two scales: physical and mental health. Each scale has a 0-100 range, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life
Measured: Twice (first day of study and 30 days after, at the end of study)
Change in neuropathic symptoms
Dolour Neuropathique 4 (DN4) questionnaire will be used to measure neuropathic symptoms. It is a questionnaire composed of 10 items. Each item is scored as 0 (no presence of neuropathic symptom) or 1 (presence of neuropathic symptom). Total score ranges between 0 and 10. It is considered that a patient suffers pain with a neuropathic component when answers affirmatively to 4 or more items of the questionnaire DN4
Measured: Twice (first day of study and 30 days after, at the end of study)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Jul 2018
- Study start10 Aug 2018
- Primary completion28 Mar 2019
- Study completion29 Nov 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for OncologyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Device feasibility
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- One condition
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 21 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universitat Jaume I
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Azucena García-Palacios, PhD, Study chair, Universitat Jaume I
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03597737
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- OncoApp
- Status last verified
- Apr 2021
- First submitted
- 19 Jun 2018
- Last updated
- 12 Apr 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Only the two principal investigators, Dra. García-Palacios and Dr. Ferrer, will be able to access to individual participant data.
Publications
Suso-Ribera C, Castilla D, Zaragoza I, Ribera-Canudas MV, Botella C, Garcia-Palacios A. Validity, Reliability, Feasibility, and Usefulness of Pain Monitor: A Multidimensional Smartphone App for Daily Monitoring of Adults With Heterogenous Chronic Pain. Clin J Pain. 2018 Oct;34(10):900-908. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000618.
PubMed 29659375Garcia-Palacios A, Herrero R, Belmonte MA, Castilla D, Guixeres J, Molinari G, Banos RM. Ecological momentary assessment for chronic pain in fibromyalgia using a smartphone: a randomized crossover study. Eur J Pain. 2014 Jul;18(6):862-72. doi: 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2013.00425.x. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
PubMed 24921074Olorunto WA, Galandiuk S. Managing the spectrum of surgical pain: acute management of the chronic pain patient. J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Jan;202(1):169-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.08.007. Epub 2005 Oct 19. No abstract available.
PubMed 16377510Porta-Sales J, Garzon Rodriguez C, Julia Torras J, Casals Merchan M. [Cancer-related breakthrough pain]. Med Clin (Barc). 2010 Jul 17;135(6):280-5. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2010.02.008. Epub 2010 May 6. No abstract available. Spanish.
PubMed 20451223
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Apr 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Utility of an APP for the Monitoring of Irruptive Oncological Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03597737
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OncoApp
- Conditions
- Oncology, Pain, Acute, Pain, Chronic
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 21 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universitat Jaume IUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 10 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 29 Nov 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The present investigation aims at exploring the effect of including a pain app called Pain Monitor irruptive oncological pain for chronic pain patients' daily monitoring. Two conditions will be set:
- usual treatment (waiting list)
- usual treatment + APP
Detailed description
Irruptive oncological pain (IOP) is defined as an exacerbation of pain in cancer patients whose base pain is stable (e.g., less than 4 on a scale of 0 to 10 for more than 12 hours a day) and is well controlled with opioids. This pain increase can appear both spontaneously and associated to a specific determining factor, be it predictable or unpredictable. The IOP tends to appear quickly (3-5 minutes) and usually have a short duration (average 30 minutes, although pain may last more than 60 minutes) and moderate intensity to elevated . The median episodes of breakthrough pain per day is of 3.
The prevalence of IOP is alarmingly high. A review study of 19 works scientists places the number of cancer patients with IOP in approximately 60%. In addition, the IOP is associated with a significant decrease in the quality of life of the patients. For example, a study conducted in different countries in Europe with 1000 cancer patients revealed that in more than 80% of the participants, the appearance of breakthrough pain completely interrupted their activities. Only 11% of the patients interviewed expressed that the IOP did not interfere in their activities. For the rest of the patients, the most affected areas were sleep and emotional well-being. In addition to these costs in the quality of life of patients with IOP, recent studies have warned of the consequences of this type of pain. Thus, an investigation carried out in the United States evidenced that three quarters of the patients interviewed had experienced important economic losses as a result of the pain, being the average direct costs associated with the IOP of $ 891 per person per month.
Aiming to choose the most appropriate study methodology for this type of pain (often unpredictable and of short duration), the investigators have reviewed the works carried out up to the moment on characteristics and treatment of the IOP. Descriptive studies on IOP tend to use a most retrospective observational methodology, which can lead to biases and inaccuracies. For example, in the most ambitious study carried out so far, 1000 patients with IOP were urged to remember the characteristics of pain episodes, such as the average intensity, the approximate average duration and the average number of events per day.
Regarding the investigations on the effectiveness of the treatment of the IOP, the studies comparing different drugs tend to perform clinical trials, while to study the response to a particular drug, seems more adequate continuous assessment of each patient during an IOP episode. This last methodology with repeated measures seems the most adequate in IOP, since the use of clinical trials with few measures (baseline, post-treatment and follow-up) has the limitation of not allowing daily monitoring of patient's pain episodes.
Although daily assessments seems to be the most suitable design for the monitoring of patients with IOP, the implementation of this type of methodology could be very expensive because requires continuous evaluation. To facilitate this, several studies have already shown that mobile applications (APP) can effectively monitor the evolution of a wide range of pathologies in the context of health. In fact, a controlled clinical study recently made found that the records eco-friendly through mobile APPs were more reliable than registers with pencil and paper.
As for the existing APPs in pain, an exhaustive review of the available APPs revealed that there was little evidence to support the use of these technologies. Specifically, these authors showed that the most APPs did not specify whether their content was validated, APPs did not include psychological components and none had been applied in a clinical study. In the light of these results, the investigators contacted the Labpsitec research team of the University Jaume I, who have developed and validated a pain application called "Pain Monitor".
The APP daily evaluates the variables recommended by the Initiative on Methods, Measurement and Evaluation of Pain (IMMPACT): intensity of the pain, use of rescue analgesics, pain interference in functioning, state of mood, general perception of health and evaluation of treatment effectiveness. In addition, "Pain Monitor" also assesses psychological factors and behavior that influence the experience of pain: catastrophism, acceptance, fear / avoidance and coping. The APP seems especially indicated for IOP monitoring since, following the recommendations of the guide "Comprehensive approach to the patient with irruptive oncological pain", allows patients access at any time to record the characteristics of pain (place, intensity, duration and characteristics of pain) and frequency of use of medication for the spikes of pain. Finally, the APP allows to create alarms so that, undesirable clinical events (e.g., severe or recurrent adverse effect, increased pain basal, no pain reduction after use of rescue medication, low adherence to treatment), are sent by email to the principal investigator of the study.
Thus, the study objective is to test if the introduction of the Pain Monitor APP in the day-to-day work of the pain unit improves pain management of irruptive oncological pain patients. To do this, it is necessary to compare the evolution of patients who follow the usual treatment at the pain unit (without app) with a group of patients who do use the Pain Monitor APP.
The investigators will perform a clinical trial comparing the 2 conditions mentioned above:
- usual treatment (waiting list)
- usual treatment + APP
Therefore, this is a clinical trial without drugs. This is not an observational study since the physicians of patients in the app + alarms condition will be asked to react to an alarm (i.e., if the patient has nausea for 3 consecutive days) by calling the patient and changing the treatment telematically, if necessary, so that the patient can collect the prescription at his primary care center. If the condition APP results in a better treatment of irruptive oncological pain patients, participants of the waiting list will be offered the possibility to use the app at the end of the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Device feasibility
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- One condition
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment as usual + APP | Experimental | Device: Pain APPParticipants at this condition will receive the usual medical treatment for their pain but also they will be monitored daily using the Pain Monitor APP. Alarms will be generated in the face of certain preestablished events. Physicians will be asked to call patients and change/stop treatment if an alarm is received. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- The patient is over 18 years of age
- Irruptive oncological pain
- The patient has a mobile phone with Android operating system
- The patient has the physical ability to use the application
- The patient does not present psychological and / or cognitive alterations or problems with language that make their participation difficult- The patient voluntarily wants to participate and signs the informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- The patient is under 18 years
- The patient does not have a mobile phone or has a mobile phone in which Android is not the operating system (the app is currently only available for Android for economic reasons)
- The patient does not have the physical capacity to use the application
- The patient does not have the capacity to participate due to psychological and / or cognitive alterations or problems with language
- The patient does not want to participate
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Pain APPpain app Pain Monitor app has been developed by a multidisciplinary pain expert panel, including physicians, psychologists, and nurses. Content has been validated in a previous study and usability has been shown to be excellent. | Device | Treatment as usual + APP |
Primary outcome
Change in average pain intensity in the past week assessed by a Numerical Rating Scale in the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form
Time frame: Twice (first day of study and 30 days after, at the end of study)
The Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) will be used to measure average pain intensity. The item has a response range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). Higher scores represent higher pain intensity levels
Change in side effects of pain medication
Time frame: Twice (first day of study and 30 days after, at the end of study)
A list of the most frequent side effects of pain medication has been created. Responses are dichotomous (0=did not experience the side effect; 1=experienced the side effect)
7 secondary outcomes
Change in depression measured by the Sadness scale in the POMS
Time frame: Twice (first day of study and 30 days after, at the end of study)
Change in anxiety measured by the Tension scale in the POMS
Time frame: Twice (first day of study and 30 days after, at the end of study)
Change in the amount of rescue medication used in the past week
Time frame: Twice (first day of study and 30 days after, at the end of study)
Change in average interference of pain in functioning in the past week measured by a Numerical Rating Scale in the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form
Time frame: Twice (first day of study and 30 days after, at the end of study)
Change in physical health status measured with the Physical Composite Score in the SF12
Time frame: Twice (first day of study and 30 days after, at the end of study)
Change in mental health status measured with the Mental Composite Score in the SF12
Time frame: Twice (first day of study and 30 days after, at the end of study)
Change in neuropathic symptoms
Time frame: Twice (first day of study and 30 days after, at the end of study)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Apr 2021.
- Background: PubMed 29659375Suso-Ribera C, Castilla D, Zaragoza I, Ribera-Canudas MV, Botella C, Garcia-Palacios A. Validity, Reliability, Feasibility, and Usefulness of Pain Monitor: A Multidimensional Smartphone App for Daily Monitoring of Adults With Heterogenous Chronic Pain. Clin J Pain. 2018 Oct;34(10):900-908. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000618.
- Background: PubMed 24921074Garcia-Palacios A, Herrero R, Belmonte MA, Castilla D, Guixeres J, Molinari G, Banos RM. Ecological momentary assessment for chronic pain in fibromyalgia using a smartphone: a randomized crossover study. Eur J Pain. 2014 Jul;18(6):862-72. doi: 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2013.00425.x. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
- Background: PubMed 16377510Olorunto WA, Galandiuk S. Managing the spectrum of surgical pain: acute management of the chronic pain patient. J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Jan;202(1):169-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.08.007. Epub 2005 Oct 19. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 20451223Porta-Sales J, Garzon Rodriguez C, Julia Torras J, Casals Merchan M. [Cancer-related breakthrough pain]. Med Clin (Barc). 2010 Jul 17;135(6):280-5. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2010.02.008. Epub 2010 May 6. No abstract available. Spanish.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Only the two principal investigators, Dra. García-Palacios and Dr. Ferrer, will be able to access to individual participant data.
Related trials for Oncology
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Selumetinib in Treating Young Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Low Grade Glioma
Low Grade Glioma, Recurrent Childhood Pilocytic Astrocytoma
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
A Single-Arm Study of Nimotuzumab Combined With NALIRIFOX as First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Azucena García-Palacios, PhD study chair
Universitat Jaume I
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Pain APP in people with Oncology and Pain, Acute, run by Universitat Jaume I at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in average pain intensity in the past week assessed by a Numerical Rating Scale in the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (time frame: Twice (first day of study and 30 days after, at the end of study)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03597737, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Apr 2021.