AzTrials
AzTrials

HealthyNCT03597893

Effects of Intranasal Oxytocin and Stress on Belief Updating

A study testing Oxytocin in people with Healthy, run by Beijing Normal University.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To investigate the effect of 24IU intranasal oxytocin on belief updating when people in stress or non-stress condition. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 40 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Healthy
What is being tested?
Oxytocin
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
131 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
27 Dec 2016to 30 Jun 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 40 years
  • Men only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • healthy subjects without past or current psychiatric or neurological disorders

Who cannot join

  • subjects with past or current psychiatric or neurological disorders

About this study

Official title: Effects of Intranasal Oxytocin and Induced Stress on People's Belief Updating

To investigate the effect of 24IU intranasal oxytocin on belief updating when people in stress or non-stress condition.

Read the detailed description

In a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled between-subjects design, healthy male volunteers receive intranasal oxytocin or placebo under stress or non-stress group prior belief updating task.

The Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) was used to induce psychosocial stress - this standardized technique enables a naturalistic exposure to a psychosocially stressful situation. This method consists primarily of a public speaking in second language (English) and a mental arithmetic task performed in front of a panel. Participants were not informed of the tasks prior to their recruitment. At the start of the TSST, they were told to prepare a 5-min speech to an unknown panel on personal suitability for their ideal job; the job description was matched to each participant, taking into consideration his personal aspirations. After the instructions, subjects were given 10 minutes of solitary preparation for this task. Then, they entered the TSST room and were told to start the presentation in front of a panel of two formally-dressed judges (one male and one female) and a conspicuous video camera. Any pause during the speech prompted a reminder from the judges of the remaining time. The interview was followed by 5 minutes of mental arithmetic performed out loud. Subjects were instructed to serially subtract 13 from 1022 as quickly and accurately as possible in front of the panel. If a mistake was made, the subject was told to start over from the beginning. After the mental arithmetic task, the TSST was concluded - subjects were confronted with the psychosocially stressful situation for a total of 10 minutes.

Non-stress groups first underwent a 5-minute session of travel magazine reading with two casually-dressed people (one male and one female), then did as many easy arithmetic questions within 5 minutes on paper. Participants were told that none of their answers would be marked.

All participants completed two sessions of self life event estimations, each with the same set of 40 adverse life events. The subjects were first presented with the events, then were instructed to estimate their likelihood (0-99%) of experiencing each event in the future (first Estimate, E1) and rate their confidence in their estimate. They were then presented with the actual probability of each event occurring to an average person in a similar environment (Feedback, F) and asked to rate their acceptance of the presented feedback. Five minutes after the first session, participants were instructed to perform the same task and provide their second estimate (E2) for the same 40 events in a randomized order and were, again, instructed to rate their confidence in their estimate. This time, however, no feedback was given. This process was repeated for a friend life event estimation session. After the second session, participants were given a surprise memory test for the presented feedback.

Conditions
Healthy
Being tested
Oxytocin, Placebo
Keywords
intranasal oxytocin, stress, belief updating

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • OxytocinDrug

    intranasally administrated

  • PlaceboDrug

    Also called Saline

    intranasally administrated

Study groups in NCT03597893
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
OxytocinExperimentalOxytocin (OXT), a neuropeptide produced in the hypothalamus, is a key modulator of complex socioaffective responses including affiliation, social approach and attachment, stress and anxiety. Subjects receiving an intranasal spray of OXT (24 IU or 40.32 mg; Syntocinon-spray; Novartis, Switzerland) .
Receives: Drug: Oxytocin
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorPlacebo contains all ingredients except for the peptide in three puffs of 3.99 IU per 6.72mg nostril.
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The updated probability estimation for negative events in the four experimental groups

    Using the second estimation value to minus the first estimation value to get the update value, as well as calculating the update value in desirable condition (first estimation < feedback) and undesirable condition (first estimation < feedback). Then investigated the general belief updating (gBU) and optimistic belief updating (using desirableBU-undesirableBU) in the four experimental condition (i.e., oxytocin-stress, oxytocin-nonstress, placebo-stress, placebo-nonstress).

    Measured: 40~125 minutes after drug administration

  2. The salivary cortisol level in four experimental groups

    Conducted ANOVA to test salivary cortisol level in the four experimental groups

    Measured: 40~125 minutes after drug administration

  3. The correlation between personality traits and belief updating value in four experimental groups

    Conducted correlation analysis to explore which personality traits would modulate the oxytocin effect or stress effect.

    Measured: 40~125 minutes after drug administration

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Jul 2018
  2. Study start27 Dec 2016
  3. Primary completion15 Aug 2017
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Model description
The study utilized a randomized, double-blind, PBO controlled, between-subject design.
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
131 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03597893
Sponsor's protocol ID
OB-OT and stress
Status last verified
Jul 2018
First submitted
2 Jul 2018
Last updated
24 Jul 2018
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Oxytocin in people with Healthy, run by Beijing Normal University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The updated probability estimation for negative events in the four experimental groups (time frame: 40~125 minutes after drug administration). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jul 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in