AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Ankle InstabilityNCT03598985

Smartphone for Assessing Balance in Patients With Ankle Instability

An observational study of Chronic Ankle Instability, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims at investigating the validity and reliability of a smartphone application "MyAnkle: in assessing the balance component of postural control in patients with chronic ankle instability (CAI). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 35 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Ankle Instability
What is being tested?
Smartphone "MyAnkle" balance application
How many people
67 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
23 Jul 2018to 30 May 2019
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 35 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Study population: Fifty patients with CAI and 50 gender-, BMI and age-matched healthy volunteers will be enrolled in this study. Healthy participants will be recruited from undergraduate and graduate students of the faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Egypt. All healthy subjects will be asymptomatic with no neuromusculoskeletal signs or symptoms. Male and female adult patients with CAI will be recruited from the outpatient clinic of the faculties of Physical Therapy and Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt.

Who may be able to join

  • Adult males and females aging from 18 to 35 years old.
  • Referred with a confirmed diagnosis of CAI, with a Cumberland Ankle Instability tool score lower than 27 points.
  • Had a recurrent sprain within the previous year.

Who cannot join

  • History of major surgery of lower limb or spine.
  • History of ankle fracture or any other lower limb fracture in the past 2 years.
  • History of lower limb injury 3 months prior to study.
  • Presence of problems that affect balance performance as visual or vestibular deficits, neurologic disease, or cerebral concussions during the past 3 months.
  • Being currently enrolled in a balance training rehabilitation program.
  • Weakness of lower limb musculatures or trunk upon screening muscle testing by the investigator.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Faculty of Physical therapy, Cairo University

    Giza, 11391

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Validity and Reliability of a Smartphone Application for Assessing Balance in Patients With Chronic Ankle Instability

This study aims at investigating the validity and reliability of a smartphone application "MyAnkle: in assessing the balance component of postural control in patients with chronic ankle instability (CAI).

Read the detailed description

Lateral ankle sprain (LAS) is a common injury in athletic and regular activities; with an incidence of 7 per 1000 exposure. After LAS, residual symptoms may persist leading to chronic ankle instability (CAI). This instability is believed to arise from dysfunctional postural control, defective proprioception, weak muscles, or reduced ankle range of motion (ROM).Thus, assessment of postural control is essential for proper clinical decision-making and treatment selection.

With advances in technology, smartphone has been introduced as an assessment tool for the musculoskeletal system. For example, it was used in assessment of ROM and mobility in stroke patients and frail elderly conditions. Further, it was used to assess balance and falling risk in those population. In addition, it was used to assess balance in healthy and participants with chronic ankle sprain. These studies proved that smartphone is a valid and reliable tool that is light in weight and inexpensive. Yet, these studies have some methodological concerns. For example, the application was not validated against gold standard or was validated only in healthy volunteers rather than in patients with musculoskeletal dysfunction. Further, a few of these studies did not establish the application discriminative validity between patients and healthy controls. Thus, this study will try to answer the following question: "Is smartphone application a valid and reliable tool to assess balance in patients with CAI compared to gold standards?

Being tested
Smartphone "MyAnkle" balance application
Keywords
Balance, Smartphone, Validity, Reliability, chronic ankle instability

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Smartphone "MyAnkle" balance applicationDiagnostic test

    Also called Biodex Balance system

    Balance will be assessed simultaneously using "MyAnkle" application and the Biodex balance system. The smartphone will be fixed to the middle of the shin with an armband. Participants will assume a single leg stance on each side under two conditions: eyes opened and closed. Testing will be done at three levels of difficulty; least difficult (level 8), moderate (level 6) and severe difficult (level 4). A conditioning trial for each level will be given for 30 seconds. Further, a 2-minute rest between tests will be given. During the testing, participants should not touch the ground or stance limb by other limb nor to grasp the handrail. Participants will repeat the same testing in two separate sessions, with one-week interval in between.

Study groups in NCT03598985
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patients with CAIPatients referred with a confirmed diagnosis of CAI, with a Cumberland Ankle Instability tool score lower than 27 points. Patients should have had a recurrent sprain within the previous year. Patients will have their balance assessed using the "Myankle" smartphone application simultaneously with Biodex balance system assessment.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Smartphone "MyAnkle" balance application
Healthy participantsHealthy participants who are not complaining of pain and have not be exposed to trauma, injury or undergone surgery for the lower quadrant of the body. Participants will have their balance assessed using the "MyAnkle" smartphone application simultaneously with Biodex balance system assessment.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Smartphone "MyAnkle" balance application

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Concurrent validity of smartphone MyAnkle application

    Correlation between the score of "MyAnkle" smartphone balance application and stability score of the Biodex balance system.

    Measured: One day

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Intrarater reliability of smartphone measurements

    same investigator will repeat balance assessment using "MyAnkle" smartphone balance application

    Measured: one week

  2. Interrater reliability of smartphone measurements

    Three investigators will assess balance using the MyAnkle smartphone application

    Measured: one day

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Jul 2018
  2. Study start23 Jul 2018
  3. Primary completion27 Feb 2019
  4. Study completion30 May 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
67 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03598985
Sponsor's protocol ID
NAbdo
Status last verified
Oct 2019
First submitted
16 Jul 2018
Last updated
23 Oct 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Individual participant data for all primary and secondary outcome measures will be made available.

Publications

  • Anandacoomarasamy A, Barnsley L. Long term outcomes of inversion ankle injuries. Br J Sports Med. 2005 Mar;39(3):e14; discussion e14. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2004.011676.

    PubMed 15728682
  • Bahr R, Karlsen R, Lian O, Ovrebo RV. Incidence and mechanisms of acute ankle inversion injuries in volleyball. A retrospective cohort study. Am J Sports Med. 1994 Sep-Oct;22(5):595-600. doi: 10.1177/036354659402200505.

    PubMed 7810781
  • Capela NA, Lemaire ED, Baddour N, Rudolf M, Goljar N, Burger H. Evaluation of a smartphone human activity recognition application with able-bodied and stroke participants. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016 Jan 20;13:5. doi: 10.1186/s12984-016-0114-0.

    PubMed 26792670
  • Chiu YL, Tsai YJ, Lin CH, Hou YR, Sung WH. Evaluation of a smartphone-based assessment system in subjects with chronic ankle instability. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2017 Feb;139:191-195. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2016.11.005. Epub 2016 Nov 11.

    PubMed 28187890
  • Delahunt E, Monaghan K, Caulfield B. Changes in lower limb kinematics, kinetics, and muscle activity in subjects with functional instability of the ankle joint during a single leg drop jump. J Orthop Res. 2006 Oct;24(10):1991-2000. doi: 10.1002/jor.20235.

    PubMed 16894592
  • Delahunt E, Monaghan K, Caulfield B. Altered neuromuscular control and ankle joint kinematics during walking in subjects with functional instability of the ankle joint. Am J Sports Med. 2006 Dec;34(12):1970-6. doi: 10.1177/0363546506290989. Epub 2006 Aug 22.

    PubMed 16926342
  • Doherty C, Delahunt E, Caulfield B, Hertel J, Ryan J, Bleakley C. The incidence and prevalence of ankle sprain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective epidemiological studies. Sports Med. 2014 Jan;44(1):123-40. doi: 10.1007/s40279-013-0102-5.

    PubMed 24105612
  • Hiller CE, Refshauge KM, Bundy AC, Herbert RD, Kilbreath SL. The Cumberland ankle instability tool: a report of validity and reliability testing. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Sep;87(9):1235-41. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.05.022.

    PubMed 16935061
  • Freeman MA, Dean MR, Hanham IW. The etiology and prevention of functional instability of the foot. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1965 Nov;47(4):678-85. No abstract available.

    PubMed 5846767
  • Garrick JG. The frequency of injury, mechanism of injury, and epidemiology of ankle sprains. Am J Sports Med. 1977 Nov-Dec;5(6):241-2. doi: 10.1177/036354657700500606. No abstract available.

    PubMed 563179
  • Patterson JA, Amick RZ, Thummar T, Rogers ME. Validation of measures from the smartphone sway balance application: a pilot study. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Apr;9(2):135-9.

    PubMed 24790774
  • Triantafyllidis AK, Velardo C, Salvi D, Shah SA, Koutkias VG, Tarassenko L. A Survey of Mobile Phone Sensing, Self-Reporting, and Social Sharing for Pervasive Healthcare. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2017 Jan;21(1):218-227. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2015.2483902. Epub 2015 Sep 29.

    PubMed 26441432
  • Mourcou Q, Fleury A, Diot B, Vuillerme N. iProprio: a smartphone-based system to measure and improve proprioceptive function. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2016 Aug;2016:2622-2625. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2016.7591268.

    PubMed 28268860
  • Perron M, Hebert LJ, McFadyen BJ, Belzile S, Regniere M. The ability of the Biodex Stability System to distinguish level of function in subjects with a second-degree ankle sprain. Clin Rehabil. 2007 Jan;21(1):73-81. doi: 10.1177/0269215506071288.

    PubMed 17213244
  • Roeing KL, Hsieh KL, Sosnoff JJ. A systematic review of balance and fall risk assessments with mobile phone technology. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2017 Nov;73:222-226. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2017.08.002. Epub 2017 Aug 4.

    PubMed 28843965

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Chronic Ankle Instability, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Oct 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Concurrent validity of smartphone MyAnkle application (time frame: One day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03598985, which also lists 21 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Oct 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in