AzTrials
AzTrials

Allergic RhinitisNCT03599908

Evaluation and Validation of Novel Diagnostic Tool for Allergists (AbioSCOPE)

An observational study of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In this study, investigators evaluated for the first time the diagnostic efficacy of abioSCOPE® versus Phadia Laboratory System as an aid in the diagnosis of allergic diseases. Investigators targetted the agreement between test results obtained in abioSCOPE® and a laboratory reference method (Phadia Laboratory System… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Allergic Rhinitis, Asthma
How many people
105 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jan 2013to 21 Dec 2016
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: patients with history of allergic rhinitis and asthma

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects examined at ambulatory medicine medicine center CHUV / PMU and for wich serum sample is required for the research of specific IgE (allergic patients, allergic group) or for any other reason (immunological) (non-allergic control patients, control group)
  • Subjects for which it is expected (allergic group subjects) or who will be asked (non-allergic control group) to perform a panel of standard prick tests as basic allergological investigation, including pollen birch, grasses, mites (D pter, D far), cat dander.
  • Obtain informed consent from each subject before any study procedure.

Who cannot join

  • Presence of positive HIV-1 viremia by the ultra-sensitive method in the 12 months preceding the study.
  • Use of any investigational or non-registered product (drug or vaccine)
  • Chronic administration (more than 14 days) of immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory drugs in the 6 months preceding the study for corticosteroids. This means a dose of Prednisone or equivalent substance greater than or equal to 0.5 mg per kg / day. Inhaled topical steroids are allowed.
  • Administration of any immunoglobulin, any immunotherapy or administration of some blood products in the 3 months preceding the study, or planned during the study period.
  • Any health condition or patient history, in the opinion of the investigator, could interfere with the evaluation of the study's objectives.
  • Participation in another experimental protocol during the period of the study.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Demonstration, confirmation or suspicion of a condition of immunosuppression or immunodeficiency (including HIV infection) based on medical history and physical examination (no laboratory test).
  • A family history of congenital or hereditary immunodeficiency.
  • Subjects taking any of the following medications: antihistamines in the week preceding the consultation, systemic steroids (inhaled or nasal steroids are allowed), anti-cytokines or cytokines, systemic interferon (injection local interferon α for the treatment of HPV is allowed) or treated with systemic chemotherapy.

About this study

Official title: Evaluation and Validation of Novel Diagnostic Tool for Allergists (AbioSCOPE) in Volunteer Population With Respiratory Allergies

In this study, investigators evaluated for the first time the diagnostic efficacy of abioSCOPE® versus Phadia Laboratory System as an aid in the diagnosis of allergic diseases. Investigators targetted the agreement between test results obtained in abioSCOPE® and a laboratory reference method (Phadia Laboratory System, ThermoFisher Scientific, Uppsala, Sweden), considered as a quasi-gold standard in IgE (immunoglobulin E) antibody assays. Investigators also reported the medical decision taken by a panel of allergy experts who had access to patient history, skin tests and IgE antibody assay, but blinded to the method used, i,e, the reference method or the abioSCOPE® .

Keywords
IgE, skin prick tests, diagnosis, rhinitis, asthma, allergy, laboratory
Medical subject headings
Rhinitis, Allergic, Asthma, Disease, Rhinitis, Hypersensitivity

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Diagnostic agreement between AbioSCOPE and Phadia Laboratory System

    Comparison of the diagnostic agreement obtain went clinical samples are measured with AbioSCOPE or with Phadia Laboratory System

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Jul 2018
  2. Study startJan 2013
  3. Primary completion14 Nov 2016
  4. Study completion21 Dec 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
105 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03599908
Sponsor's protocol ID
309/12
Status last verified
Jul 2018
First submitted
16 Jul 2018
Last updated
26 Jul 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Diagnostic agreement between AbioSCOPE and Phadia Laboratory System (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jul 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in