Multiple Chronic ConditionsPPCNCT03600389
Patient Priorities Care (PPC)
A study testing Patient Priorities Care in people with Multiple Chronic Conditions, run by Yale University.
Trial summary
Patient Priorities Care aligns healthcare decision-making and care by all clinicians with patients' own health priorities. Patient Priorities Care involves not only the health outcome goals that patients want to achieve, but also their preferences for healthcare. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 66 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Multiple Chronic Conditions
- What is being tested?
- Patient Priorities Care
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 414 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2016to 31 Aug 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 66 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age >65 years
- Member of Pro-Health Practice for >=3 years
- Determined to be an appropriate candidate evidenced by ANY of the following:
- Multiple Chronic Conditions (presence of >3 active health problems)
- >10 medications
- ≥ 1 hospitalization over the past year
- ≥ 2 emergency department visits over the past year
- Seen by >2 specialists (excluding GYN and eye) over the past year
Who cannot join
- End stage renal disease
- Unable to consent (e.g. dementia)
- In hospice or meeting hospice criteria
- Nursing home resident
- Not English speaking
About this study
Official title: Patient Priorities Care for Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions Achieved Through Primary and Specialty Care Alignment: Patient Priorities Care (PPC)
Patient Priorities Care aligns healthcare decision-making and care by all clinicians with patients' own health priorities. Patient Priorities Care involves not only the health outcome goals that patients want to achieve, but also their preferences for healthcare. This approach is about aligning what outcomes patients want from their healthcare with what they are willing and able to do to achieve these outcomes. The approach begins with a member of the healthcare team helping patients identify their health outcome goals and their care preferences and preparing them to interact with their clinicians around these goals and preferences. The goals and preferences are transmitted to the patient's clinicians who use them in decision-making and communication with the patient and other clinicians.
Read the detailed description
Many older adults with Multiple Chronic Conditions receive conflicting recommendations and care that may be fragmented across clinicians. Older adults vary in what's most important when faced with tradeoffs and vary in the health-related activities they are willing and able to complete to achieve their desired outcomes. A potential solution to these problems is to move from decision-making predicated solely on disease-guidelines to decision-making based on achieving each patient's own specific health outcome goals (e.g., relief of symptoms sufficient to allow specific functional activity) within the context of what they are willing and able to do (i.e. care preferences) to achieve these outcomes.
The primary aims of the Patient Priorities Care (PPC) pilot is to assess the feasibility of aligning primary and specialty care to focus on the health priorities (i.e. specific and actionable outcome goals and care preferences) of older adults with multiple chronic conditions (MCC)
- Conditions
- Multiple Chronic Conditions
- Being tested
- Patient Priorities Care
- Keywords
- Patient Health Priorities, Health Outcome Goals, Healthcare Preferences
- Medical subject headings
- Multiple Chronic Conditions
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Patient Priorities CareBehavioural
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Arm (Implementing Patient Priorities Care) | Experimental | Aligning healthcare recommendations to achieve patients' specific health outcome goals within the context of what patients are willing and able to do. Receives: Behavioral: Patient Priorities Care |
| Control Arm (Not Implementing Patient Priorities Care) | No intervention | Routine Care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Treatment Burden Questionnaire (TBQ)
Measure to assess treatment burden among patients with one or more chronic conditions. Summary score is 0-150 with lower numbers indicating less burden. This is an exploratory study and the investigators will compare the intervention to control group to determine if the intervention group scores are lower on the TBQ (i.e. less burden).
Measured: 6-12 Months
Older Patient Assessment of Care for Chronic Conditions (O-PACIC)
Measure to assess chronically-ill patients' perceptions of the degree to which health care delivery is integrated and coordinated. Summary score is 1-5 with higher score indicated greater integration. This is an exploratory study and the investigators will compare the intervention to control group to determine if the intervention group scores higher on O-PACIC (i.e. greater integration).
Measured: 6-12 Months
CollaboRATE
Measure of shared decision making in clinical encounters. Summary score is 0-100 with higher score indicated greater shared decision making. This is an exploratory study and the investigator will compare the intervention to control group to determine if the intervention group scores higher on CollaboRATE (i.e. greater shared decision-making).
Measured: 6-12 Months
Health Care Utilization
Measures of changes in health care utilization drawn from review of patient medical records
Measured: 6-12 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Older Patient Assessment of Care for Chronic Conditions (O-PACIC) subscales
Sub-scales within the O-PACIC including patient activation (sub-scores range from 1-5 with higher score indicating greater activation), delivery system design/support (sub-scale score ranges from 1-5 with higher scores indicating greater system design/support), goal setting (sub-scale scores range from 1-5 with higher scores indicating improved goal setting), problem-solving/contextual counseling (sub-scale scores range from 1-5 with higher scores indicating improved problem-solving/contextual counseling), and follow-up/coordination (sub-scale scores range from 1-5 with higher scores indicating greater follow-up/coordination).
Measured: 6-12 Months
Combined items from the Treatment Burden Questionnaire (TBQ) that appear to measure similar constructs.
Items that assess self-management tasks (3 items that range from 0-30 with lower scores indicating less self-management burden), medical visits (2 items that range from 0-20 with lower scores indicating less burden from doctor visits), laboratory tests and other examinations (1 item that ranges from 0-10 with lower scores indicating less burden from lab exams), relationships with providers (1 item with scores ranging from 0-10 with lower scores indicating less burden from relationships with providers), medications (4 items with scores ranging from 0-40 with lower scores indicating less burden from medications).
Measured: 6-12 Months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Jul 2018
- Study start1 Oct 2016
- Primary completion31 Aug 2018
- Study completion31 Aug 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Multiple Chronic ConditionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Yale UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 414 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Yale University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The John A. Hartford Foundation, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03600389
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1601017608
- Acronym
- PPC
- Status last verified
- Jul 2019
- First submitted
- 1 May 2018
- Last updated
- 5 Jul 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Tinetti ME, Naik AD, Dindo L, Costello DM, Esterson J, Geda M, Rosen J, Hernandez-Bigos K, Smith CD, Ouellet GM, Kang G, Lee Y, Blaum C. Association of Patient Priorities-Aligned Decision-Making With Patient Outcomes and Ambulatory Health Care Burden Among Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Dec 1;179(12):1688-1697. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.4235.
PubMed 31589281
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Jul 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Patient Priorities Care for Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions Achieved Through Primary and Specialty Care Alignment: Patient Priorities Care (PPC)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03600389
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PPC / 1601017608
- Conditions
- Multiple Chronic Conditions
- Keywords
- Patient Health Priorities, Health Outcome Goals, Healthcare Preferences
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 414 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Yale UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The John A. Hartford Foundation, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Patient Priorities Care aligns healthcare decision-making and care by all clinicians with patients' own health priorities. Patient Priorities Care involves not only the health outcome goals that patients want to achieve, but also their preferences for healthcare. This approach is about aligning what outcomes patients want from their healthcare with what they are willing and able to do to achieve these outcomes. The approach begins with a member of the healthcare team helping patients identify their health outcome goals and their care preferences and preparing them to interact with their clinicians around these goals and preferences. The goals and preferences are transmitted to the patient's clinicians who use them in decision-making and communication with the patient and other clinicians.
Detailed description
Many older adults with Multiple Chronic Conditions receive conflicting recommendations and care that may be fragmented across clinicians. Older adults vary in what's most important when faced with tradeoffs and vary in the health-related activities they are willing and able to complete to achieve their desired outcomes. A potential solution to these problems is to move from decision-making predicated solely on disease-guidelines to decision-making based on achieving each patient's own specific health outcome goals (e.g., relief of symptoms sufficient to allow specific functional activity) within the context of what they are willing and able to do (i.e. care preferences) to achieve these outcomes.
The primary aims of the Patient Priorities Care (PPC) pilot is to assess the feasibility of aligning primary and specialty care to focus on the health priorities (i.e. specific and actionable outcome goals and care preferences) of older adults with multiple chronic conditions (MCC)
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Arm (Implementing Patient Priorities Care) | Experimental | Behavioral: Patient Priorities CareAligning healthcare recommendations to achieve patients' specific health outcome goals within the context of what patients are willing and able to do. |
| Control Arm (Not Implementing Patient Priorities Care) | No intervention | –Routine Care |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 66 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Age >65 years
- Member of Pro-Health Practice for >=3 years
- Determined to be an appropriate candidate evidenced by ANY of the following:
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- End stage renal disease
- Unable to consent (e.g. dementia)
- In hospice or meeting hospice criteria
- Nursing home resident
- Not English speaking
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Priorities Care | Behavioural | Intervention Arm (Implementing Patient Priorities Care) |
Primary outcome
Treatment Burden Questionnaire (TBQ)
Time frame: 6-12 Months
Measure to assess treatment burden among patients with one or more chronic conditions. Summary score is 0-150 with lower numbers indicating less burden. This is an exploratory study and the investigators will compare the intervention to control group to determine if the intervention group scores are lower on the TBQ (i.e. less burden).
Older Patient Assessment of Care for Chronic Conditions (O-PACIC)
Time frame: 6-12 Months
Measure to assess chronically-ill patients' perceptions of the degree to which health care delivery is integrated and coordinated. Summary score is 1-5 with higher score indicated greater integration. This is an exploratory study and the investigators will compare the intervention to control group to determine if the intervention group scores higher on O-PACIC (i.e. greater integration).
CollaboRATE
Time frame: 6-12 Months
Measure of shared decision making in clinical encounters. Summary score is 0-100 with higher score indicated greater shared decision making. This is an exploratory study and the investigator will compare the intervention to control group to determine if the intervention group scores higher on CollaboRATE (i.e. greater shared decision-making).
Health Care Utilization
Time frame: 6-12 months
Measures of changes in health care utilization drawn from review of patient medical records
2 secondary outcomes
Older Patient Assessment of Care for Chronic Conditions (O-PACIC) subscales
Time frame: 6-12 Months
Combined items from the Treatment Burden Questionnaire (TBQ) that appear to measure similar constructs.
Time frame: 6-12 Months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Jul 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31589281Tinetti ME, Naik AD, Dindo L, Costello DM, Esterson J, Geda M, Rosen J, Hernandez-Bigos K, Smith CD, Ouellet GM, Kang G, Lee Y, Blaum C. Association of Patient Priorities-Aligned Decision-Making With Patient Outcomes and Ambulatory Health Care Burden Among Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Dec 1;179(12):1688-1697. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.4235.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Multiple Chronic Conditions
Recruiting
Dry Needling in Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of AHB-137 in Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB) Participants in North America and Europe Regions
Hepatitis B, Chronic
RecruitingPhase 1
Autologous T Cells Transduced With Retroviral Vectors Expressing TCRs for Participant-specific Neoantigens in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies
Malignancy, Hematologic, Neoplasms, Hematologic
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Phase Ia/Ib Trial of SCTA02A Injection in Healthy Adults and Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B
Hepatitis B
RecruitingObservational study
Cancer Experience Registry (CER) for Cancer Patients and Caregivers
Neoplasms, Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Patient Priorities Care in people with Multiple Chronic Conditions, run by Yale University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Treatment Burden Questionnaire (TBQ) (time frame: 6-12 Months). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03600389, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jul 2019.