Stigma, SocialNCT03602222
An LGBT-Competency Program for Mental Health Professionals in Romania
A study testing Mobile web training LGBT mental health and In-person training LGBT mental health in people with Stigma, Social and Gays, run by Rutgers University at 1 site in Romania.
Trial summary
Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender individuals (LGBTI) present increased morbidity compared to the general population, which is attributed to healthcare discrimination and lack of LGBT-specific expertise, especially in high-stigma countries. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Stigma, Social, Gays, Lesbians
- What is being tested?
- Mobile web training LGBT mental health and In-person training LGBT mental health
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 1 siteRomania
- Study dates
- 16 Sep 2017to 31 Jan 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Romanian practicing MHPs (psychologists or psychiatrists) or MHPs in training
Who cannot join
- All those who do not meet the inclusion criteria
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Increasing Provider Competence for Treating Stress-related Mental Health Conditions in Low Resource Settings
Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender individuals (LGBTI) present increased morbidity compared to the general population, which is attributed to healthcare discrimination and lack of LGBT-specific expertise, especially in high-stigma countries. Motivated by fear, Romanian LGBTI conceal their identities and report significantly more barriers to healthcare access than heterosexuals. Poor mental health, specifically anxiety and depression, is elevated for Romanian LGBTI, and associated with poor physical health (e.g., HIV risk, alcohol abuse.) However, LGBT-competent mental health professionals (MHPs) are nearly non-existent in Romania, and thus the negative impact of homophobia on mental health cannot be ameliorated. Given that a pilot of an in-person LGBT-affirmative MHP training recently tested in Romania showed significant receptivity and increased competence among MHPs, this training is ripe for testing its feasibility and efficacy in creating significant change via mobile delivery, in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Proving the efficacy of this first mobile training and supervision model has high potential for cost-effective and expeditious boundless dissemination. Aim 1 will test the relative feasibility and efficacy of the mHealth MHP training by conducting an RCT comparing a mobile training (MT) of MHP LGBT-competency program (n=60) to the equivalent in-person training (IPT) (n=60) recently piloted. Both programs' content and structure will be identical (2-day trainings and two boosters 6 months apart). At baseline, 4, 8, and 12 months, all MHPs' LGBT-related attitudes, knowledge of LGBT health needs and clinical practice, and LGBT caseload will be assessed in a mobile fashion. In Aim 2 will test the efficacy of a companion mHealth supervision and consultation program in maintaining LGBT competency and enhancing LGBT-friendly practice. Half of the MHPs in each group will receive mHealth supervision and expert consultation program, consisting of monthly 2-hour virtual group meetings to discuss case studies, in order to determine the added benefit of mobile supervision. At the end of the study, 10 MHPs will provide interview-based program feedback. In Aim 3, the investigators will build mHealth research capacity among MHPs by demonstrating how to integrate mobile data collection tools in clinical practice to monitor client progress for personalized treatment plans.
Read the detailed description
Participants and Procedures. Partner Consortium. The PI has strategically chosen four types of partners in order to maximize the sustainability of our training. The study team's multidisciplinarity will increase the potential for reach across domains that are pivotal in changing the landscape of mental health for LGBTI in Romania. First, the team partnered with a multi-service provider, the Romanian Association against AIDS (ARAS), a non-governmental not-for-profit organization founded in 1992 to support the health of hidden and vulnerable groups including LGBTI. ARAS intends to expand the depth and breadth of its LGBT-competency in mental health. Second, the team has received the essential support of academics (Hyperion University and Professors Călugaru and Dumitriu), which are forefront agents for social change. Third, individual MHPs in private practice who are connected with key associations have signed on as liaisons to their affiliated organizations (e.g., Bellanima Center for Psychotherapy and Psychiatry) to facilitate training participation. Fourth, the team continues its fruitful collaboration with their technical developer, Data Center Solutions (DCS), who built the mobile platform on which the team delivered live therapy for DMDN, collected real-time mental health and behavioral data, and disseminated sexual health materials. DCS is an expert in health systems information technology (medical e-learning; patient health-promotion), and will build our mHealth training platform.
Inclusion Criteria. 120 Romanian practicing MHPs (psychologists or psychiatrists) or MHPs in training will be eligible to participate.
Recruitment. The Partner Consortium will advertise the project via web-postings, listservs and eblasts to their national circles. Facebook ads were the most successful source of recruitment for DMDN. The team will thus be able to canvas all regions of Romania. Further, due to the pilot work, the team is maintaining contact with close to 100 MHPs from Bucharest (the capital), and other cities (e.g., Sibiu, Iasi, Cluj Napoca, Timisoara). While they will not be eligible to participate because they had exposure to the program, they will circulate, as indicated by their Letters of Support, future trainings among their circles of individual practice and professional affiliations (e.g., Romanian Collegiate of Psychologists, the Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Association of Romania).
Screening and Consent. Study ads will link to the Qualtrics electronic screener easily accessed from any mobile device. MHPs will take the 5-minute survey (Appendix 2) to determine eligibility, and be randomized to either the MT group or IPT group (based on age and geographical region). The study budgeted travel stipends for one-third of the MHPs, whom the team anticipate live outside Bucharest, such that travel costs will not impede their participation in IPT and to ensure that each group will include samples that are unbiased geographically. Notably, the pilot included non-Bucharest residents. Alternate training dates will be offered for those unable to attend the trainings. Group assignment, training dates, locations, and link to a Qualtrics baseline (BL) survey will be sent prior to the training. The BL contains the consent form with our contacts for questions. The team tested these procedures in the pilot, during which the PI answered study questions from MHPs via email.
Sixty MHPs will be randomized to receive a 2-day IPT in Bucharest, and 60 MHPs will be randomized to the equivalent 3-day MT, on a DCS-designed platform compatible with any mobile device, and with document-sharing and voice-conferencing capabilities. The didactic trainings will be interspersed with answering MHP's questions (voice or text).
Supervision and Consultation. After the first follow-up (4 months post training), half of the IPT MHPs and half of the MT MHPs (n=30 per group, total n=60) will receive 2-hour monthly mobile supervision using a forum format on our mobile platform for 8 months. DCS will design a group chat feature, similar to the one they devised for a previous pilot study. The live monthly supervision will occur on this platform after the 4-month and before the 12-month assessments. This system will provide MHPs with a fully automated and interactive mobile platform through which they will participate in supervision, as well as submit questions and receive answers for case consultation from the experts (Dr. Pachankis and DMDN intervention psychologists) within 48 hours. Further, MHPs will receive case studies through our mobile website, monthly, with response options asking them their best approach to helping the client (e.g., common LGBT stressor situations such as coming out, negotiating sexual safety, reducing isolation, or replacing health-depleting behaviors such as excessive drinking with healthy alternatives). Cases are fully discussed during supervision. At the end of the study, those who did not receive supervision will be given access to all the case studies and the mobile consultation site to achieve equity.
Boosters. We will hold two 2-hour IPT and MT boosters, respectively, 6 and 12 months post training, and provide an overview of LGBT-affirmative therapy principles, their incorporation into clinical practice, clarifications, and troubleshooting. Case studies will be included covering common issues raised by LGBTI.
Measures of MHP Attitudes, Knowledge, and Clinical Practice. The mixed-methods design involves qualitative interviews (n=10) and 30-min. self-administered internet-based quantitative surveys (n=120) by MHPs, the latter being administered at BL, and at 4, 8, and 12-month follow-ups. Surveys will be identical and assess, in a mobile fashion, changes in MHPs' LGBT attitudes, knowledge of LGBT health needs, clinical practice skills, and LGBT caseload.
Feasibility and Acceptability. Feasibility measures include data on session attendance. Acceptability measures include 5-min. session rating surveys (on mobile devices), and the 10 qualitative interviews.
Efficacy. MHPs will report their age, gender, specialization, years of clinical practice, and LGBT caseload. We will measure attitudes, knowledge and clinical skills; and the presence of explicit and implicit stigma and homophobia.
- Conditions
- Stigma, Social, Gays, Lesbians, Bisexuals, Gender Dysphoria
- Being tested
- Mobile web training LGBT mental health, In-person training LGBT mental health
- Keywords
- LGBT mental health, provider training in LGBT-affirmative clinical practice
- Medical subject headings
- Social Stigma, Homosexuality, Homosexuality, Female, Bisexuality, Gender Dysphoria
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Mobile web training LGBT mental healthBehavioural
Mobile web training LGBT mental health: Half of the participants were randomly assigned to receive the training in LGBT mental health in a the mobile fashion (on the web).
In-person training LGBT mental healthBehavioural
In-person training LGBT mental health: Half of the participants were randomly assigned to receive the training in LGBT mental health in-person.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| In-person training LGBT mental health | Active comparator | In-person training LGBT mental health: Participants randomized to the in-person condition will receive training in LGBT-affirmative mental health counseling face-to-face. Receives: Behavioral: In-person training LGBT mental health |
| Mobile training LGBT mental health | Experimental | Mobile training LGBT mental health: Participants randomized to the mobile training condition will receive training in LGBT-affirmative mental health counseling while on the web. Receives: Behavioral: Mobile web training LGBT mental health |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Changes in attitudes towards LGBT patients as assessed by the Attitudes Subscale of the Sexual Orientation Provider Competency Scale
The Attitudes Subscale of the Sexual Orientation Provider Competency Scale measures providers' negative attitudes towards LGBT clients. It consists of 10 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1, ''strongly disagree,'' to 5, ''strongly agree.'' A higher score indicates more negative attitudes.
Measured: Change in negative attitudes (mean scores) from baseline to each follow-up assessment point (4, 8, and 12 months post-training )
Changes in knowledge for LGBT competent practice as assessed by the Knowledge Subscale of the Sexual Orientation Provider Competency Scale
The Knowledge Subscale of the Sexual Orientation Provider Competency Scale measures providers' LGBT knowledge of issues that are specific to LGBT clients. It consists of 8 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1, ''strongly disagree,'' to 5, ''strongly agree.'' A higher score indicates more knowledge.
Measured: Change in Knowledge (mean scores) from baseline to each follow-up assessment point (4, 8, and 12 months post-training )
Changes in clinical skills as assessed by the Clinical Skills subscale of the Sexual Orientation Provider Competency Scale
The Clinical Skills Subscale of the Sexual Orientation Provider Competency Scale measures providers' clinical skills in addressing LGBT mental health issues. It consists of 8 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1, ''strongly disagree,'' to 5, ''strongly agree.'' Item 7 was reverse-coded. A higher score indicates more clinical skills.
Measured: Change in Clinical Skills (mean scores) from baseline to each follow-up assessment point (4, 8, and 12 months post-training )
Changes in homophobic attitudes towards LGBT patients as assessed by the Modern Homonegativity Scale
The Modern Homonegativity Scale measures providers' homophobic attitudes towards LGBT individuals. It consists of 11 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1, ''strongly disagree,'' to 5, ''strongly agree.'' Items 5 and 8 were reverse-coded. A higher score indicates higher homophobic attitudes.
Measured: Change in homophobic attitudes (mean scores) from baseline to each follow-up assessment point (4, 8, and 12 months post-training )
Changes in implicit bias attitudes towards homosexual (gay or lesbian) individuals as assessed by the Sexual Orientation Implicit Association Test (Sexual Orientation IAT)
The Sexual Orientation IAT measures providers' implicit bias against homosexual (gay or lesbian) individuals. It consists of a reaction-time double categorization task in which participants are asked to categorize positive (e.g., "joyful") or negative (e.g., "disgusting") concepts and images of homosexual or heterosexual couples. Scores range between -1 and +1, with scores closed to 0 indicating impartial attitudes towards either group, scores closer to -1 indicating lower implicit bias towards homosexual individuals.
Measured: Change in implicit bias (mean scores) from baseline to each follow-up assessment point (4, 8, and 12 months post-training )
Secondary outcomes (4)
LGBT client case load
The number of LGBT clients a mental health professional has. Higher intervention impact is indicated by increases in LGBT client load at each follow-up assessment point post-training.
Measured: Change (increase) in LGBT client case load (total number reported) from baseline to each follow-up assessment point (4, 8, and 12 months post-training )
Intervention Feasibility measured by session attendance
Feasibility measures include data on session attendance. These numbers should ideally be as close to 120 for the training sessions and booster sessions (6 and 12 months post training) as possible to indicate high intervention feasibility.
Measured: Feasibility (session attendance) will be measured at baseline, and the two boosters at 6 months and 12 months post-baseline. An indicator of high feasibility includes 120 attendees for the training and two boosters.
Intervention Acceptability measured by session rating surveys
Acceptability measures include 5-minute session rating surveys of the quality of the training. It consists of 9 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1, ''strongly disagree,'' to 5, ''strongly agree.'' The higher the score is, the higher the acceptability.
Measured: The session ratings will take place at the end of the training. The training consisted of 2 days and it was held approximately two weeks after baseline.
Intervention Acceptability measured by qualitative interviews
Acceptability measures include 10 phone qualitative interviews with randomly selected trainees. These cannot be quantified, but themes will be identified (e.g., concept clarity, content appropriateness, missing information) indicative of positive and negative aspects identified by interviewees, informing how acceptable the training was and what changes need to be made for future iterations of it.
Measured: The 10 qualitative interviews will take place at the end of the study (12 months post training).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Jul 2018
- Study start16 Sep 2017
- Primary completion30 Oct 2018
- Study completion31 Jan 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Stigma, SocialStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- 120 MHPs will be randomized to receive the training either in-person or mobile on the web, concomitantly.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Rutgers University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Yale University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Corina Lelutiu-Weinberger, Rutgers University
- Investigators
- Corina Lelutiu-Weinberger, PhD, Study director, Rutgers University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03602222
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RutgersU
- Status last verified
- Jan 2020
- First submitted
- 15 Jun 2018
- Last updated
- 5 Feb 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: All those interested should contact the PI who will then share relevant study information.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Feb 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Increasing Provider Competence for Treating Stress-related Mental Health Conditions in Low Resource Settings
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03602222
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RutgersU
- Conditions
- Stigma, Social, Gays, Lesbians, Bisexuals, Gender Dysphoria
- Keywords
- LGBT mental health, provider training in LGBT-affirmative clinical practice
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Rutgers UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Yale University
- Study start
- 16 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jan 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender individuals (LGBTI) present increased morbidity compared to the general population, which is attributed to healthcare discrimination and lack of LGBT-specific expertise, especially in high-stigma countries. Motivated by fear, Romanian LGBTI conceal their identities and report significantly more barriers to healthcare access than heterosexuals. Poor mental health, specifically anxiety and depression, is elevated for Romanian LGBTI, and associated with poor physical health (e.g., HIV risk, alcohol abuse.) However, LGBT-competent mental health professionals (MHPs) are nearly non-existent in Romania, and thus the negative impact of homophobia on mental health cannot be ameliorated. Given that a pilot of an in-person LGBT-affirmative MHP training recently tested in Romania showed significant receptivity and increased competence among MHPs, this training is ripe for testing its feasibility and efficacy in creating significant change via mobile delivery, in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Proving the efficacy of this first mobile training and supervision model has high potential for cost-effective and expeditious boundless dissemination. Aim 1 will test the relative feasibility and efficacy of the mHealth MHP training by conducting an RCT comparing a mobile training (MT) of MHP LGBT-competency program (n=60) to the equivalent in-person training (IPT) (n=60) recently piloted. Both programs' content and structure will be identical (2-day trainings and two boosters 6 months apart). At baseline, 4, 8, and 12 months, all MHPs' LGBT-related attitudes, knowledge of LGBT health needs and clinical practice, and LGBT caseload will be assessed in a mobile fashion. In Aim 2 will test the efficacy of a companion mHealth supervision and consultation program in maintaining LGBT competency and enhancing LGBT-friendly practice. Half of the MHPs in each group will receive mHealth supervision and expert consultation program, consisting of monthly 2-hour virtual group meetings to discuss case studies, in order to determine the added benefit of mobile supervision. At the end of the study, 10 MHPs will provide interview-based program feedback. In Aim 3, the investigators will build mHealth research capacity among MHPs by demonstrating how to integrate mobile data collection tools in clinical practice to monitor client progress for personalized treatment plans.
Detailed description
Participants and Procedures. Partner Consortium. The PI has strategically chosen four types of partners in order to maximize the sustainability of our training. The study team's multidisciplinarity will increase the potential for reach across domains that are pivotal in changing the landscape of mental health for LGBTI in Romania. First, the team partnered with a multi-service provider, the Romanian Association against AIDS (ARAS), a non-governmental not-for-profit organization founded in 1992 to support the health of hidden and vulnerable groups including LGBTI. ARAS intends to expand the depth and breadth of its LGBT-competency in mental health. Second, the team has received the essential support of academics (Hyperion University and Professors Călugaru and Dumitriu), which are forefront agents for social change. Third, individual MHPs in private practice who are connected with key associations have signed on as liaisons to their affiliated organizations (e.g., Bellanima Center for Psychotherapy and Psychiatry) to facilitate training participation. Fourth, the team continues its fruitful collaboration with their technical developer, Data Center Solutions (DCS), who built the mobile platform on which the team delivered live therapy for DMDN, collected real-time mental health and behavioral data, and disseminated sexual health materials. DCS is an expert in health systems information technology (medical e-learning; patient health-promotion), and will build our mHealth training platform.
Inclusion Criteria. 120 Romanian practicing MHPs (psychologists or psychiatrists) or MHPs in training will be eligible to participate.
Recruitment. The Partner Consortium will advertise the project via web-postings, listservs and eblasts to their national circles. Facebook ads were the most successful source of recruitment for DMDN. The team will thus be able to canvas all regions of Romania. Further, due to the pilot work, the team is maintaining contact with close to 100 MHPs from Bucharest (the capital), and other cities (e.g., Sibiu, Iasi, Cluj Napoca, Timisoara). While they will not be eligible to participate because they had exposure to the program, they will circulate, as indicated by their Letters of Support, future trainings among their circles of individual practice and professional affiliations (e.g., Romanian Collegiate of Psychologists, the Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Association of Romania).
Screening and Consent. Study ads will link to the Qualtrics electronic screener easily accessed from any mobile device. MHPs will take the 5-minute survey (Appendix 2) to determine eligibility, and be randomized to either the MT group or IPT group (based on age and geographical region). The study budgeted travel stipends for one-third of the MHPs, whom the team anticipate live outside Bucharest, such that travel costs will not impede their participation in IPT and to ensure that each group will include samples that are unbiased geographically. Notably, the pilot included non-Bucharest residents. Alternate training dates will be offered for those unable to attend the trainings. Group assignment, training dates, locations, and link to a Qualtrics baseline (BL) survey will be sent prior to the training. The BL contains the consent form with our contacts for questions. The team tested these procedures in the pilot, during which the PI answered study questions from MHPs via email.
Sixty MHPs will be randomized to receive a 2-day IPT in Bucharest, and 60 MHPs will be randomized to the equivalent 3-day MT, on a DCS-designed platform compatible with any mobile device, and with document-sharing and voice-conferencing capabilities. The didactic trainings will be interspersed with answering MHP's questions (voice or text).
Supervision and Consultation. After the first follow-up (4 months post training), half of the IPT MHPs and half of the MT MHPs (n=30 per group, total n=60) will receive 2-hour monthly mobile supervision using a forum format on our mobile platform for 8 months. DCS will design a group chat feature, similar to the one they devised for a previous pilot study. The live monthly supervision will occur on this platform after the 4-month and before the 12-month assessments. This system will provide MHPs with a fully automated and interactive mobile platform through which they will participate in supervision, as well as submit questions and receive answers for case consultation from the experts (Dr. Pachankis and DMDN intervention psychologists) within 48 hours. Further, MHPs will receive case studies through our mobile website, monthly, with response options asking them their best approach to helping the client (e.g., common LGBT stressor situations such as coming out, negotiating sexual safety, reducing isolation, or replacing health-depleting behaviors such as excessive drinking with healthy alternatives). Cases are fully discussed during supervision. At the end of the study, those who did not receive supervision will be given access to all the case studies and the mobile consultation site to achieve equity.
Boosters. We will hold two 2-hour IPT and MT boosters, respectively, 6 and 12 months post training, and provide an overview of LGBT-affirmative therapy principles, their incorporation into clinical practice, clarifications, and troubleshooting. Case studies will be included covering common issues raised by LGBTI.
Measures of MHP Attitudes, Knowledge, and Clinical Practice. The mixed-methods design involves qualitative interviews (n=10) and 30-min. self-administered internet-based quantitative surveys (n=120) by MHPs, the latter being administered at BL, and at 4, 8, and 12-month follow-ups. Surveys will be identical and assess, in a mobile fashion, changes in MHPs' LGBT attitudes, knowledge of LGBT health needs, clinical practice skills, and LGBT caseload.
Feasibility and Acceptability. Feasibility measures include data on session attendance. Acceptability measures include 5-min. session rating surveys (on mobile devices), and the 10 qualitative interviews.
Efficacy. MHPs will report their age, gender, specialization, years of clinical practice, and LGBT caseload. We will measure attitudes, knowledge and clinical skills; and the presence of explicit and implicit stigma and homophobia.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- 120 MHPs will be randomized to receive the training either in-person or mobile on the web, concomitantly.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| In-person training LGBT mental health | Active comparator | Behavioral: In-person training LGBT mental healthIn-person training LGBT mental health: Participants randomized to the in-person condition will receive training in LGBT-affirmative mental health counseling face-to-face. |
| Mobile training LGBT mental health | Experimental | Behavioral: Mobile web training LGBT mental healthMobile training LGBT mental health: Participants randomized to the mobile training condition will receive training in LGBT-affirmative mental health counseling while on the web. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Romanian practicing MHPs (psychologists or psychiatrists) or MHPs in training
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All those who do not meet the inclusion criteria
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile web training LGBT mental healthMobile web training LGBT mental health: Half of the participants were randomly assigned to receive the training in LGBT mental health in a the mobile fashion (on the web). | Behavioural | Mobile training LGBT mental health |
| In-person training LGBT mental healthIn-person training LGBT mental health: Half of the participants were randomly assigned to receive the training in LGBT mental health in-person. | Behavioural | In-person training LGBT mental health |
Primary outcome
Changes in attitudes towards LGBT patients as assessed by the Attitudes Subscale of the Sexual Orientation Provider Competency Scale
Time frame: Change in negative attitudes (mean scores) from baseline to each follow-up assessment point (4, 8, and 12 months post-training )
The Attitudes Subscale of the Sexual Orientation Provider Competency Scale measures providers' negative attitudes towards LGBT clients. It consists of 10 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1, ''strongly disagree,'' to 5, ''strongly agree.'' A higher score indicates more negative attitudes.
Changes in knowledge for LGBT competent practice as assessed by the Knowledge Subscale of the Sexual Orientation Provider Competency Scale
Time frame: Change in Knowledge (mean scores) from baseline to each follow-up assessment point (4, 8, and 12 months post-training )
The Knowledge Subscale of the Sexual Orientation Provider Competency Scale measures providers' LGBT knowledge of issues that are specific to LGBT clients. It consists of 8 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1, ''strongly disagree,'' to 5, ''strongly agree.'' A higher score indicates more knowledge.
Changes in clinical skills as assessed by the Clinical Skills subscale of the Sexual Orientation Provider Competency Scale
Time frame: Change in Clinical Skills (mean scores) from baseline to each follow-up assessment point (4, 8, and 12 months post-training )
The Clinical Skills Subscale of the Sexual Orientation Provider Competency Scale measures providers' clinical skills in addressing LGBT mental health issues. It consists of 8 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1, ''strongly disagree,'' to 5, ''strongly agree.'' Item 7 was reverse-coded. A higher score indicates more clinical skills.
Changes in homophobic attitudes towards LGBT patients as assessed by the Modern Homonegativity Scale
Time frame: Change in homophobic attitudes (mean scores) from baseline to each follow-up assessment point (4, 8, and 12 months post-training )
The Modern Homonegativity Scale measures providers' homophobic attitudes towards LGBT individuals. It consists of 11 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1, ''strongly disagree,'' to 5, ''strongly agree.'' Items 5 and 8 were reverse-coded. A higher score indicates higher homophobic attitudes.
Changes in implicit bias attitudes towards homosexual (gay or lesbian) individuals as assessed by the Sexual Orientation Implicit Association Test (Sexual Orientation IAT)
Time frame: Change in implicit bias (mean scores) from baseline to each follow-up assessment point (4, 8, and 12 months post-training )
The Sexual Orientation IAT measures providers' implicit bias against homosexual (gay or lesbian) individuals. It consists of a reaction-time double categorization task in which participants are asked to categorize positive (e.g., "joyful") or negative (e.g., "disgusting") concepts and images of homosexual or heterosexual couples. Scores range between -1 and +1, with scores closed to 0 indicating impartial attitudes towards either group, scores closer to -1 indicating lower implicit bias towards homosexual individuals.
4 secondary outcomes
LGBT client case load
Time frame: Change (increase) in LGBT client case load (total number reported) from baseline to each follow-up assessment point (4, 8, and 12 months post-training )
Intervention Feasibility measured by session attendance
Time frame: Feasibility (session attendance) will be measured at baseline, and the two boosters at 6 months and 12 months post-baseline. An indicator of high feasibility includes 120 attendees for the training and two boosters.
Intervention Acceptability measured by session rating surveys
Time frame: The session ratings will take place at the end of the training. The training consisted of 2 days and it was held approximately two weeks after baseline.
Intervention Acceptability measured by qualitative interviews
Time frame: The 10 qualitative interviews will take place at the end of the study (12 months post training).
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Feb 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. All those interested should contact the PI who will then share relevant study information.
Related trials for Stigma, Social
Active, not recruiting
Addressing Stigma in Screening and Diagnostic Delay for Cervical Cancer
Cervical Cancer Screening
Not yet recruiting
Pilot Study to Co-create and Implement a Multicomponent Intervention to Reduce Mental Health Stigma in Primary Care
Mental Health, Stigma of Mental Illness
Not yet recruiting
Testing a Multi-Level Approach to Reduce Stigma for Women Living With HIV
HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Healthcare Providers' Attitudes Toward Oncology Patients With Mental Disorders
Stigma of Mental Illness, Cancer
Recruiting
Reducing Mental Health Stigmatization Among Healthcare Workers and Students Using a Virtual Reality Protocol: The VIRTUS Protocol
Schizophrenia Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Corina Lelutiu-Weinberger, PhD study director
Rutgers University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Mobile web training LGBT mental health and In-person training LGBT mental health in people with Stigma, Social and Gays, run by Rutgers University at 1 site in Romania.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Feb 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Romania. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Changes in attitudes towards LGBT patients as assessed by the Attitudes Subscale of the Sexual Orientation Provider Competency Scale (time frame: Change in negative attitudes (mean scores) from baseline to each follow-up assessment point (4, 8, and 12 months post-training )). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Feb 2020.