AzTrials
AzTrials

Intracerebral HemorrhageDIST pilotNCT03608423

Dutch Intracerebral Hemorrhage Surgery Trial Pilot Study

A study testing Minimally-invasive endoscopy-guided surgery in people with Intracerebral Hemorrhage and Surgical Procedures, Minimally Invasive, run by Radboud University Medical Center at 10 sites in Netherlands.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background: Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) accounts for 15-20% of all strokes in Western Europe, and contributes profoundly to mortality and disability. Thirty day case fatality is 40% and of those surviving, only few gain independence. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Minimally-invasive endoscopy-guided surgery
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
169 participants
Where
10 sitesNetherlands
Study dates
3 Dec 2018to 7 Apr 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 18
  • NIHSS ≥ 2
  • Supratentorial ICH confirmed by CT, without a CT-angiography confirmed causative vascular lesion (e.g. aneurysma, arteriovenous malformation [AVM], dural arteriovenous fistula [DAVF], cerebral venous sinus thrombosis [CVST]).
  • Minimal lesion size 10 mL
  • Intervention can be started within 8 hours from symptoms onset; or for controls presentation within 8 hours of symptom onset.
  • Patient's or legal representative's written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Pre-stroke disability, which interferes with the assessment of functional outcome at 90 days, i.e. mRS > 2
  • Causative vascular lesion (e.g. aneurysm, AVM, DAVF, CVST) on CT-angiography or other known underlying cause (e.g. tumor, cavernoma)
  • Untreated coagulation abnormalities, including INR > 1.3 (point of care measurement allowed) and treatment with oral thrombin or factor X antagonists; patients on vitamin K antagonist can be included after correction of the INR.
  • Current known severe infection for which antibiotic treatment at time of ICH symptom onset
  • Patient moribund (e.g. coning, bilateral dilated unresponsive pupils)
  • Pregnancy (note: most patients will be beyond child bearing age; if not a pregnancy test is mandatory).

Trial locations and contacts

10 sites in 1 country.

10 sites in 1 country

Netherlands10 sites
  • Academic Medical Center

    Amsterdam

  • Medisch Spectrum Twente

    Enschede

  • Leiden University Medical Center

    Leiden, 2333 ZA

  • Maastricht University Medical Center

    Maastricht

  • Radboud University Medical Center

    Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6525 GC

  • Erasmus Medical Center

    Rotterdam, 3015 CE

  • Haaglanden Medical Center

    The Hague

  • Elisabeth Tweesteden Ziekenhuis

    Tilburg

  • University Medical Center Utrecht

    Utrecht

  • Isala

    Zwolle

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: The Dutch Intracerebral Hemorrhage Surgery Trial Pilot Study; Minimally-invasive Endoscopy-guided Surgery for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Background:

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) accounts for 15-20% of all strokes in Western Europe, and contributes profoundly to mortality and disability. Thirty day case fatality is 40% and of those surviving, only few gain independence. Except for stroke unit care and early blood pressure lowering there is currently no treatment of proven benefit. Important predictors of poor outcome are increasing age, decreasing Glasgow Coma Scale score, increasing ICH volume, presence of intraventricular hemorrhage and deep or infratentorial location. In addition, secondary injury due to development of edema and inflammatory response, contribute to disability and death. Surgical treatment, mostly comprising craniotomy, has so far not been proven effective. In the largest trials STICH and STICH II, the median time to treatment was more than 24 hours, which may be an important explanation for the lack of treatment effect.

Read more

The investigators hypothesize that early, minimally-invasive, endoscopy-guided surgery improves outcome in patients with spontaneous supratentorial ICH.

Objective: to study safety, feasibility and technical effectiveness of minimally-invasive endoscopy guided surgery for treatment of spontaneous supratentorial ICH and to estimate the potential effect on outcome.

Study design: a multicenter, prospective intervention study (phase II) with a telephonic follow up interview at 90 and 180 days.The pilot study serves as a prelude to a randomized phase III trial in which the investigators aim to assess whether this intervention improves functional outcome at 90 and 180 days.

Study population: patients with spontaneous supratentorial ICH of 18 years and older. Forty patients in three participating centers (Radboudumc, Erasmus MC and AMC) will undergo minimally-invasive endoscopy-guided surgery. Three-hundred-and-sixty patients undergoing standard medical treatment in one of 7 other participating centers, will be included as a control group.

Intervention: minimally-invasive endoscopy-guided surgery within 8 hours of symptom onset, in addition to standard medical management.

Primary study outcomes: safety (death within 24 hours, 7-day procedure related complications, 7-day mortality, 30-day mortality) and technical effectiveness (proportional volume reduction, proportion of participants with volume reduction > 60 and >80%, and proportion with remaining clot volume <15mL).

Secondary outcomes: modified Rankin Scale score at 90 and 180 days after ICH (functional outcome).

Read the detailed description

The full protocol is available at https://dutch-ich.nl/trial-protocol-and-trial-documents.html

Being tested
Minimally-invasive endoscopy-guided surgery
Keywords
Intracerebral Hemorrhage, Surgical Procedures, Minimally Invasive, Surgical Procedures, Endoscopic
Medical subject headings
Cerebral Hemorrhage

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Minimally-invasive endoscopy-guided surgeryDevice

    Also called Minimally-invasive endoscopy-guided hematoma aspiration

    Surgery started within 8 hours of onset of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.

Study groups in NCT03608423
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Surgical treatmentExperimentalMinimally-invasive endoscopy-guided surgery or hematoma aspiration, additional to standard medical treatment.
Receives: Device: Minimally-invasive endoscopy-guided surgery
Standard medical managementNo interventionStandard medical treatment (treatment of bloodpressure, admission to stroke unit and supportive care, surgical treatment if necessary in case of deterioration)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Death within 24 hours

    Death within 24 hours after baseline.

    Measured: 24 hours

  2. Neurological deterioration within 24 hours

    Neurological deterioration, defined as an increase of ≥4 points on the sumscore of the NIHSS or >2 National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)is a sum score, composed of 11 items, each of which scores a specific ability between 0 and 4. For each item, a score of 0 typically indicates normal function in that ability, while a higher score indicates the level of impairment. The total score varies between 0 (no symptoms at all) and 42. points on one item of NIHSS,

    Measured: 24 hours

  3. Proportion of volume reduction

    The proportion of volume reduction, based on baseline CT and CT at 24 hours (in the intervention group).

    Measured: Baseline and 24 hours (based on the comparison baseline CT and CT at 24 hours).

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Procedure related complications

    The proportion of patients with procedure related complications at 7 days, including: rebleed, intracranial hemorrhage, epileptic seizures and intracranial infection. (in the intervention group)

    Measured: 7 days

  2. Mortality at 7 days

    Proportion of patients that died within 7 days after baseline

    Measured: 7 days

  3. Mortality at 30 days

    Proportion of patients that died within 30 days after baseline

    Measured: 30 days

  4. Percentage of patients with clot volume reduction ≥60%

    The proportion of patients in which the clot volume could be reduced with 60% or more, based on the comparison baseline CT and CT at 24 hours. (in the intervention group)

    Measured: Baseline and 24 hours CT (the difference is measured)

  5. Percentage of patients with clot volume reduction ≥ 80%

    The proportion of patients in which the clot volume could be reduced with 80% or more, based on the comparison baseline CT and CT at 24 hours. (in the intervention group)

    Measured: Baseline and 24 hours CT (the difference is measured)

  6. Percentage of patients with remaining clot volume of ≤ 15mL

    The proportion of patients in which due to clot removal a remaining clot volume of ≤ 15mL was established at 24 hours. (in the intervention group)

    Measured: 24 hours CT

  7. Proportion of conversion to craniotomy

    The proportion of patients in which a conversion to craniotomy was required and done. (in the intervention group)

    Measured: 24 hours

  8. Functional outcome at 3 months

    Ordinal shift in functional outcome (comparing the intervention group to the controls), assessed with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months. This is a six point scale in which a score of 0 means no symptoms at all, a higher score means more impairment, and a score of 6 means the participant is dead.

    A favorable outcome is defined as mRS 0-3 and mRS 0-2.

    Measured: 3 months (90 days)

  9. Functional outcome at 6 months

    Ordinal shift in functional outcome (comparing the intervention group to the controls), , assessed with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 6 months. This is a six point scale in which a score of 0 means no symptoms at all, a higher score means more impairment, and a score of 6 means the participant is dead.

    A favorable outcome is defined as mRS 0-3 and mRS 0-2.

    Measured: 6 months (180 days)

  10. National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at 7 days or discharge

    National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)is a sum score, composed of 11 items, each of which scores a specific ability between 0 and 4. For each item, a score of 0 typically indicates normal function in that ability, while a higher score indicates the level of impairment. The total score varies between 0 (no symptoms at all) and 42.

    Measured: 7 days (or at discharge from the hospital if earlier)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Aug 2018
  2. Study start3 Dec 2018
  3. Primary completion7 Apr 2022
  4. Study completion7 Apr 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
We will include 40 patients in the surgical arm (inclusion in three hospitals) and aim for 120 matched controls in the other arm (in 7 other hospitals).
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
169 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03608423
Sponsor's protocol ID
NL6310007817
Acronym
DIST pilot
Status last verified
Aug 2022
First submitted
30 Apr 2018
Last updated
13 Oct 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Sondag L, Schreuder FHBM, Pegge SAH, Coutinho JM, Dippel DWJ, Janssen PM, Vandertop WP, Boogaarts HD, Dammers R, Klijn CJM; Dutch ICH Surgery Trial Study Group, part of the CONTRAST consortium. Safety and technical efficacy of early minimally invasive endoscopy-guided surgery for intracerebral haemorrhage: the Dutch Intracerebral haemorrhage Surgery Trial pilot study. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Jun;165(6):1585-1596. doi: 10.1007/s00701-023-05599-2. Epub 2023 Apr 27.

    PubMed 37103585
  • Lahr MMH, Maas WJ, van der Zee DJ, Uyttenboogaart M, Buskens E. Rationale and design for studying organisation of care for intra-arterial thrombectomy in the Netherlands: simulation modelling study. BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 7;10(1):e032754. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032754.

    PubMed 31915166

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Minimally-invasive endoscopy-guided surgery in people with Intracerebral Hemorrhage and Surgical Procedures, Minimally Invasive, run by Radboud University Medical Center at 10 sites in Netherlands.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Oct 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 10 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Death within 24 hours (time frame: 24 hours). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03608423, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Oct 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in