AzTrials
AzTrials

Pain, AcuteNCT03609957

Exercise and Pain in Non-Hispanic Blacks and Whites

A study testing Aerobic Exercise Training and Interval Training in people with Pain, Acute and Pain, Neuropathic, run by Georgia State University at 1 site in United States.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Non-Hispanic Blacks tend to report higher levels of pain, experience pain more frequently, and be under-treated for pain compared to non-Hispanic Whites. Acute (single session) exercise is known to be effective at reducing pain but it is unknown what effect chronic exercise training has on pain responses. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 40 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Pain, Acute, Pain, Neuropathic, Analgesia
What is being tested?
Aerobic Exercise Training and Interval Training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Feb 2019to Dec 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 40 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Healthy
  • Normotensive
  • Identify as non-Hispanic Black or non-Hispanic White
  • Healthy enough to participate in regular exercise
  • Not taking any medications other than birth control

Who cannot join

  • Heart disease (high blood pressure, previous stroke or heart attack)
  • Type 1 or 2 diabetes
  • History of cancer treated with chemotherapy
  • History of nerve damage
  • History of chronic pain
  • Current smoker/tobacco user or quit less than 1 year ago
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Skin disorders (psoriasis, etc.)
  • Pregnant
  • Taking any medications other than birth control

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Georgia State University

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30303

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Effect of Exercise on Pain Responses in Non-Hispanic Blacks and Whites

Non-Hispanic Blacks tend to report higher levels of pain, experience pain more frequently, and be under-treated for pain compared to non-Hispanic Whites. Acute (single session) exercise is known to be effective at reducing pain but it is unknown what effect chronic exercise training has on pain responses. The broad goal of this study is to determine whether regular exercise training is more effective at reducing pain responses in non-Hispanic Blacks compared to non-Hispanic Whites. The investigators are interested in comparing regular aerobic exercise training versus high-intensity interval training.

Read the detailed description

Racial discrepancy in the experience of pain is well documented within the literature. Non-Hispanic Blacks (NHB) report greater amounts and severity of clinical pain compared to non-Hispanic Whites (NHW) in a variety of clinical conditions. NHB also experience greater pain-related symptoms and disability, regardless of descriptive factors such as age, gender, and socioeconomic status or clinical factors such as comorbidities and duration of disease. Further, NHB tend to be medically undertreated for pain, regardless of nearly identical reporting of pain level and severity compared with NHW. Not only is adequate pain treatment infrequent, but many pain treatments are less effective in NHB than in NHW, commonly resulting in less reduction of pain severity in this population.

In comparison to NHW, NHB report greater sensitivity to several types of pain, including heat pain, cold pressor pain, ischemic pain, and electrical stimulation. NHB show increased temporal summation, implying central nervous system hypersensitivity and hyperexcitability to noxious (painful) stimuli. Specifically, regarding experimental heat pain, NHB differ minimally in pain threshold or ratings of pain intensity compared to NHW, but perceive greater unpleasantness of pain and show a lower pain tolerance. The physiological mechanisms underlying this racial discrepancy remain unknown.

Experimental pain assessment is valuable in understanding the experience of pain between individuals. Pain is an individual experience and differs from one to another. However, differences in experimental pain perceived may estimate the clinical pain one would experience. Studies show that greater experimental pain sensitivity is associated with greater experience of day-to-day pain in healthy adults and can predict higher levels of clinical pain in adult patients.

While affective (subjective) pain perception has been the focus of the majority of pain assessment studies, in 2008 Campbell et al. investigated the nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR), an involuntary and objective component of the pain response. The NFR is a spinal-mediated reflex that follows activation of nociceptive A-delta afferents by noxious stimuli. This study shows the NFR threshold in NHB is decreased compared to NHW, implying a physiological difference between these racial groups that may contribute to the discrepancy in pain perception. Skin blood flow via vasodilation, another physiological measure, has been shown to increase in response to noxious thermal stimuli in order to distribute heat away from a singular point in the cutaneous environment and prevent damage. Assessing changes in skin blood flow in response to noxious thermal stimuli may further elucidate physiological differences between races that affect pain perception.

It is important to investigate more effective prevention or treatment methods for pain in NHB. Exercise-induced hypoalgesia (EIH) is characterized by decreased pain sensation following physical exercise. Specifically, EIH leads to decreased sensitivity to noxious (painful) stimuli, increased pain thresholds, increased pain tolerance, and decreased pain ratings. EIH has been shown to occur following several types of exercise, such as acute bouts of submaximal, continuous aerobic exercise and acute bouts of isometric hand-grip exercise. Lending to the knowledge of racial discrepancy in pain perception, a study by Umeda et al. in 2016 showed NHB had a smaller magnitude of EIH compared to NHW following isometric hand-grip exercise, but racial differences in EIH remain incompletely understood.

It is suggested that hypoalgesia following exercise may be due to an overlapping of pain perception and cardiovascular mechanisms. For example, pain regulation and blood pressure control are associated with the same brain stem nuclei. Further, hypertensive individuals have shown reduced sensitivity to noxious (painful) stimuli compared to normotensives, and acute pharmacological elevations in blood pressure have been shown to alter pain perception. Therefore, it is important to investigate alterations in pain perception following both acute (which should elicit elevations in blood pressure) and chronic (which should elicit overall declines in blood pressure) exercise.

Several studies have investigated the effects of submaximal exercise on various types of pain and it is typical to see moderate-intensity continuous (MIC) exercise incorporated into pain management programs (generally 30 minutes of 70% VO2max exercise). However, two studies in particular display data indicating that as workload increases, pain thresholds increase in a stepwise manner. Other studies show EIH occurs more consistently following exercise at higher intensities (> 70% VO2max), indicating that high intensity interval training (HIIT) may produce more beneficial results in affective and/or objective responses to pain than MIC exercise. Several studies have looked at affective pain perception following acute submaximal bouts of aerobic and isometric exercise. Those that have investigated acute HIIT have only examined affective responses. The investigators do not know of any studies that have looked at the acute and chronic effect of MIC exercise and HIIT on affective and objective pain perception in NHB and NH There are three main purposes of this study, and they are as follows: 1) to assess objective and subjective responses to pain in NHB and NHW, 2) to assess the use of acute versus chronic exercise in pain management for NHW and NHB, and 3) to assess the use of MIC exercise versus HITT in pain management for NHW and NHB. The investigators hypothesize that 1) NHB will show decreased skin blood flow response to noxious stimuli compared to NHW prior to exercise training, 2) NHB will report greater pain ratings than NHW prior to exercise training, and 3) chronic HIIT will mitigate the differences in skin blood flow and pain ratings between NHB and NHW.

Being tested
Aerobic Exercise Training, Interval Training
Medical subject headings
Acute Pain, Neuralgia, Agnosia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Aerobic Exercise TrainingOther

    Traditional, continuous aerobic exercise (cycling) at a moderate intensity

  • Interval TrainingOther

    High-intensity interval exercise consisting of short bursts of exercise interspersed with rest periods

Study groups in NCT03609957
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Aerobic Exercise TrainingExperimentalModerate intensity (75% heart rate reserve) cycling exercise for 32 minutes, 3 days per week for 5 weeks
Receives: Other: Aerobic Exercise Training
Interval TrainingExperimentalHigh intensity (95% heart rate reserve) cycling exercise for 20 minutes, 3 days per week for 5 weeks
Receives: Other: Interval Training
ControlNo interventionControl (no exercise intervention) group

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in skin blood flow response to local heating

    Vasodilation in response to painful and non-painful heating of the skin

    Measured: Baseline (prior to intervention or control) and at the conclusion of the 5-week intervention or control. The post-intervention assessment will be performed no later than 3-5 days after completion of the 5-week intervention or control.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Aug 2018
  2. Study startFeb 2019 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionDec 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2019 (estimated)

Why it stopped: Did not have time to complete this study

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Factorial
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03609957
Sponsor's protocol ID
R01HL141205
Status last verified
Dec 2018
First submitted
11 Jul 2018
Last updated
11 Dec 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: The current approved IRB and informed consent state that we will not share participants' data except with applicable oversight bodies (IRB, FDA, OHRP, etc.).

Publications

  • Green CR, Anderson KO, Baker TA, Campbell LC, Decker S, Fillingim RB, Kalauokalani DA, Lasch KE, Myers C, Tait RC, Todd KH, Vallerand AH. The unequal burden of pain: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in pain. Pain Med. 2003 Sep;4(3):277-94. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4637.2003.03034.x.

    PubMed 12974827
  • Klonoff EA. Disparities in the provision of medical care: an outcome in search of an explanation. J Behav Med. 2009 Feb;32(1):48-63. doi: 10.1007/s10865-008-9192-1. Epub 2009 Jan 6.

    PubMed 19127421
  • Riley JL 3rd, Wade JB, Myers CD, Sheffield D, Papas RK, Price DD. Racial/ethnic differences in the experience of chronic pain. Pain. 2002 Dec;100(3):291-298. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00306-8.

    PubMed 12468000
  • Edwards RR, Doleys DM, Fillingim RB, Lowery D. Ethnic differences in pain tolerance: clinical implications in a chronic pain population. Psychosom Med. 2001 Mar-Apr;63(2):316-23. doi: 10.1097/00006842-200103000-00018.

    PubMed 11292281
  • Green CR, Baker TA, Sato Y, Washington TL, Smith EM. Race and chronic pain: A comparative study of young black and white Americans presenting for management. J Pain. 2003 May;4(4):176-83. doi: 10.1016/s1526-5900(02)65013-8.

    PubMed 14622701
  • Bruce B, Fries JF, Murtagh KN. Health status disparities in ethnic minority patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study. J Rheumatol. 2007 Jul;34(7):1475-9. Epub 2007 Jun 1.

    PubMed 17552045
  • Cano A, Mayo A, Ventimiglia M. Coping, pain severity, interference, and disability: the potential mediating and moderating roles of race and education. J Pain. 2006 Jul;7(7):459-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2006.01.445.

    PubMed 16814685
  • Golightly YM, Dominick KL. Racial variations in self-reported osteoarthritis symptom severity among veterans. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2005 Aug;17(4):264-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03324608.

    PubMed 16285190
  • Vallerand AH, Hasenau S, Templin T, Collins-Bohler D. Disparities between black and white patients with cancer pain: the effect of perception of control over pain. Pain Med. 2005 May-Jun;6(3):242-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2005.05038.x.

    PubMed 15972088
  • Mechlin B, Heymen S, Edwards CL, Girdler SS. Ethnic differences in cardiovascular-somatosensory interactions and in the central processing of noxious stimuli. Psychophysiology. 2011 Jun;48(6):762-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01140.x. Epub 2010 Oct 29.

    PubMed 21039586
  • Anderson KO, Mendoza TR, Valero V, Richman SP, Russell C, Hurley J, DeLeon C, Washington P, Palos G, Payne R, Cleeland CS. Minority cancer patients and their providers: pain management attitudes and practice. Cancer. 2000 Apr 15;88(8):1929-38.

    PubMed 10760771
  • Merry B, Campbell CM, Buenaver LF, McGuire L, Haythornthwaite JA, Doleys DM, Edwards RR. Ethnic Group Differences in the Outcomes of Multidisciplinary Pain Treatment. J Musculoskelet Pain. 2011 Jan;19(1):24-30. doi: 10.3109/10582452.2010.538821.

    PubMed 21731407
  • Siedlecki SL. Racial variation in response to music in a sample of African-American and Caucasian chronic pain patients. Pain Manag Nurs. 2009 Mar;10(1):14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2008.08.003.

    PubMed 19264279
  • Campbell CM, Edwards RR, Fillingim RB. Ethnic differences in responses to multiple experimental pain stimuli. Pain. 2005 Jan;113(1-2):20-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.08.013.

    PubMed 15621360
  • Chapman WP, Jones CM. VARIATIONS IN CUTANEOUS AND VISCERAL PAIN SENSITIVITY IN NORMAL SUBJECTS. J Clin Invest. 1944 Jan;23(1):81-91. doi: 10.1172/JCI101475. No abstract available.

    PubMed 16695086

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Aerobic Exercise Training and Interval Training in people with Pain, Acute and Pain, Neuropathic, run by Georgia State University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Dec 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in skin blood flow response to local heating (time frame: Baseline (prior to intervention or control) and at the conclusion of the 5-week intervention or control. The post-intervention assessment will be performed no later than 3-5 days after completion of the 5-week intervention or control.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03609957, which also lists 44 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Dec 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in