AzTrials
AzTrials

Vitamin D DeficiencyIMMUNI-DNCT03609970

Vitamin D and Immunity: Photosynthesis Versus Supplementation

A study testing Vitamin D and UVR (Solar simulated radiation) in people with Vitamin D Deficiency, run by Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The optimal way to restore serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D sufficiency is currently debatable. UV irradiation through sunshine exposure promotes endogenous vitamin D synthesis, although this can also be associated with a risk of UVR-induced skin cancer. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 40 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Vitamin D Deficiency
What is being tested?
Vitamin D and UVR (Solar simulated radiation)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
36 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
19 Nov 2015to 14 Apr 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 40 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age: 18-40
  • Fitzpatrick skin type I/II
  • Healthy
  • Serum 25(OH)D3 <50nmol/L

Who cannot join

  • Serum 25(OH)D3 >50nmol/L
  • Pregnant or nursing women
  • Women of child bearing age not using adequate contraception
  • Are taking photosensitizing medication (i.e. causes you to be more sensitive to sunlight)
  • Have had a history of skin disorders, sensitive skin, sensitivity to sunlight or skin cancer
  • Have previously had an organ transplant
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Have partaken in a clinical study within the last 14 days
  • Have had recent exposure to sunbeds (last 4 months) or holiday sun (including skiing)
  • Are currently or have taken vitamin D supplements in the last 4 months Are asthmatic or suffer from any allergies

About this study

The optimal way to restore serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D sufficiency is currently debatable. UV irradiation through sunshine exposure promotes endogenous vitamin D synthesis, although this can also be associated with a risk of UVR-induced skin cancer. Dietary supplements represent an alternative, which are increasingly being used in clinical trials to correct deficiency. However, it is unclear whether sunshine exposure and vitamin D supplementation induce comparable changes in immune function, or whether additional UVR-induced molecules may be responsible for proposed health benefits. Several studies report an inverse correlation between exposure to UVR and immune-mediated diseases, further supporting the theory that UVR may also be protective through non vitamin-D mediated pathways. So far it has been difficult to distinguish between immune-regulation by vitamin D and other mediators induced by UVR as the downstream effects are similar. A direct comparison of the biological effects of vitamin D obtained by UVR versus supplementation has never been made. This study aims to elucidate the differences in vitamin D generated by UVR exposure versus supplementation by comparing immunological endpoints

Being tested
Vitamin D, UVR (Solar simulated radiation)
Keywords
Vitamin D, UVR, Immune system
Medical subject headings
Vitamin D Deficiency

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Vitamin DDietary supplement

    Daily 4X 1000IU cholecalciferol

  • UVR (Solar simulated radiation)Radiation

    1.25 SED Solar simulated radiation twice weekly

Study groups in NCT03609970
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ControlNo interventionNo intervention
UVR (Solar simulated radiation)ExperimentalTwice weekly 1.25 SED (sub-erythemal) (4 weeks)
Receives: Radiation: UVR (Solar simulated radiation)
Vitamin D3 supplementationExperimental4X 1000IU cholecalciferol tablets daily (28 days)
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Vitamin D status of healthy participants treated with oral vitamin D (cholecalciferol) or UVR (SSR) exposures and control (untreated)

    Measure 25(OH)D3nmol/L via LC-MS/MS

    Measured: 3 years

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Changes to peripheral blood cell frequency

    Frequency of major peripheral immune cells (e.g. CD3+ T cells, CD3+ CD4+ T cells, CD3+ CD8+ T cells, CD19+ B cells, Natural Killer Cells, Classical, Non-classical and Intermediate Monocytes) in participants when vitamin D insufficient and sufficient. Via flow cytometry.

    Measured: 3 years

  2. Impact upon the frequency and phenotype of peripheral blood dendritic cells

    Frequency of peripheral blood dendritic cells (myeloid and plasmacytoid) in individuals with insufficient vitamin D levels and following vitamin D repletion via supplementation or UVR (SSR) exposures. Assessment of markers of maturation/tolerogenicity (MFI and frequency expressing) on myeloid and plasmacytoid dendritic cells direct ex vivo and after stimulation in vitro in participants when vitamin D insufficient and sufficient.

    Measured: 3 years

  3. Gene expression in peripheral blood myeloid and plasmacytoid dendritic cells

    Differentially regulated genes in myeloid and plasmacytoid dendritic cells in participants after vitamin D repletion via supplementation and UVR (SSR) exposure via Microarray.

    Measured: 3 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Aug 2018
  2. Study start19 Nov 2015
  3. Primary completion14 Apr 2017
  4. Study completion14 Apr 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
36 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03609970
Sponsor's protocol ID
RJ115/N204
Acronym
IMMUNI-D
Status last verified
Jul 2018
First submitted
22 Jun 2018
Last updated
1 Aug 2018
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Vitamin D and UVR (Solar simulated radiation) in people with Vitamin D Deficiency, run by Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Aug 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Vitamin D status of healthy participants treated with oral vitamin D (cholecalciferol) or UVR (SSR) exposures and control (untreated) (time frame: 3 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Aug 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in