AzTrials
AzTrials

Spinal Stenosis, Lumbar Region, With Neurogenic ClaudicationNCT03610737

The MOTION Study - Treatment of LSS With the MILD Procedure

A study testing MILD Procedure and Conventional Medical Management (CMM) in people with Spinal Stenosis, Lumbar Region, With Neurogenic Claudication, run by Vertos Medical, Inc. at 18 sites in United States.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical study examining functional improvement in lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) patients with neurogenic claudication who are treated with the MILD procedure plus conventional medical management (CMM) compared to those treated with CMM alone, as the control. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 to 80 years
What is being tested?
MILD Procedure and Conventional Medical Management (CMM)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
155 participants
Where
18 sitesUnited States
Study dates
2 Aug 2018to 30 Apr 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients experiencing neurogenic claudication symptoms for at least 3 months duration.
  • LSS with neurogenic claudication
  • Radiologic evidence of LSS with unilateral or bilateral ligamentum flavum ≥ 2.5mm confirmed by pre-op MRI or CT performed within 12 months of baseline visit.
  • Patients with comorbid conditions commonly associated with spinal stenosis, such as osteophytes, facet hypertrophy, minor spondylolisthesis (Grade I without instability), foraminal stenosis, and/or disk protrusion may be included unless the treating physician has determined that the condition is too advanced.
  • Stable opioid intake with no change during 30 days prior to enrollment.
  • Available to complete all follow-up visits.

Who cannot join

  • ODI Score < 31 (0-100 ODI Scale).
  • NPRS Score < 5 (0-10 NPRS Scale).
  • Lumbar epidural injections during eight weeks prior to study enrollment.
  • Baseline analgesic medication greater than 90 milligram morphine equivalent (MME).
  • Prior surgery at the same treatment level.
  • Previously received interspinous spacer at the same treatment level.
Show all 17Show fewer
  • Previously received intradiscal procedure at the same treatment level.
  • Previously received vertebral augmentation procedure at the same treatment level.
  • Previously received the MILD procedure at the same treatment level.
  • Received radiofrequency ablation at the same or the adjacent levels within 6 months prior to study enrollment.
  • History of spinal fractures with current related pain symptoms.
  • Grade II or higher spondylolisthesis.
  • Motor deficit or disabling back and/or leg pain from causes other than LSS neurogenic claudication (e.g. acute compression fracture, metabolic neuropathy, or vascular claudication symptoms, etc.).
  • Unable to walk ≥ 10 feet unaided before being limited by pain. In this context, 'unaided' means without the use of a cane, walker, railing, wall, another person or any other means of walking assistance.
  • Previously randomized and/or treated in this clinical study.
  • Epidural lipomatosis (if it is deemed to be a significant contributor of canal narrowing by the physician).
  • On (or pending) Workman's Compensation or known to be considering litigation associated with back pain.

Trial locations and contacts

18 sites in 1 country.

18 sites in 1 country

United States18 sites
  • Roanoke-Chowan Pain Management

    Ahoskie, North Carolina, 27910

  • MI Interventional Pain Center

    Brownstown, Michigan, 48183

  • Pennsylvania Pain & Spine Institute

    Chalfont, Pennsylvania, 18914

  • The Center for Pain Relief

    Charleston, West Virginia, 25301

  • Cleveland Clinic

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44195

  • Centura Spine Center

    Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80923

  • Center for Pain Management

    Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601

  • Spine & Pain Institute of Florida

    Lakeland, Florida, 33602

  • University of Kentucky

    Lexington, Kentucky, 40508

  • Newport Heache & Pain

    Newport Beach, California, 92660

  • SIMED

    Ocala, Florida, 34474

  • Kansas Pain Management

    Overland Park, Kansas, 66201

  • Interventional Pain Management Specialists

    Overland Park, Kansas, 66209

  • The Pain Management and Rehabilitation Center

    Seymour, Indiana, 47274

  • Montefiore Medical Center

    The Bronx, New York, 10467

  • Precision Spin Care

    Tyler, Texas, 75701

  • UH St. John Pain Management Center

    Westlake, Ohio, 44145

  • Michigan Pain Specialists

    Ypsilanti, Michigan, 63376

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Multi-center, Randomized Controlled Study of the Vertos MILD Procedure With Conventional Medical Management Versus Conventional Medical Management Alone in the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical study examining functional improvement in lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) patients with neurogenic claudication who are treated with the MILD procedure plus conventional medical management (CMM) compared to those treated with CMM alone, as the control. Subjects in the control group are able to crossover and receive MILD after completion of 12-month follow-up. The study will provide objective functional improvement data for patients treated with the mild Procedure as first-line therapy in a real-world setting.

Read the detailed description

The study will follow participants treated in the MILD plus CMM group and crossover participants for up to 5 years on annual bases.

Being tested
MILD Procedure, Conventional Medical Management (CMM)
Medical subject headings
Spinal Stenosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MILD ProcedureDevice

    The percutaneous procedure is performed under fluoroscopic guidance to effect a lumbar decompression with minimal surrounding tissue and bone disruption. The mild® Device Kit is utilized to access, capture and remove bone and tissue.

    Other Name: MILD lumbar decompression

  • Conventional Medical Management (CMM)Other

    CMM can include physical therapy, home exercise, pain medication, epidural steroid injections, nerve blocks, and other lumbar steroid injections.

Study groups in NCT03610737
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
MILD with CMMActive comparatorThe MILD procedure is an image-guided minimally-invasive lumbar decompression with conventional medical managment
Receives: Device: MILD Procedure; Other: Conventional Medical Management (CMM)
CMM aloneActive comparatorPatient in the CMM alone group can have physical therapy, home exercise, pain medication, epidural steroid injections, nerve blocks, and other lumbar steroid injections.
Receives: Other: Conventional Medical Management (CMM)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mean Change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

    Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a widely-used validated questionnaire use to measure a patient's functional disability. The total score ranges from 0 (no disability) - 100 (complete disability). Score categories: 0-20 (minimal disability), 21-40 (moderate disability), 41-60 (severe disability), 61-80 (crippling back pain), 81-100 (bed bound or have an exaggerating).

    Measured: Mean Change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) baseline to 12 month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Aug 2018
  2. Study start2 Aug 2018
  3. Primary completion30 May 2021
  4. Study completion30 Apr 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
155 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03610737
Sponsor's protocol ID
Motion
Status last verified
Sep 2024
First submitted
28 Jun 2018
Last updated
2 Oct 2024
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Deer TR, Chafin TB, Costandi SJ, Qu H, Kim C, Jassal N, Patel K, Calodney A. The MOTION study: Two-year results of a real-world randomized controlled trial of the mild(R) procedure for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Pain Pract. 2024 Jan;24(1):109-119. doi: 10.1111/papr.13293. Epub 2023 Sep 3.

    PubMed 37661347
  • Deer TR, Costandi SJ, Washabaugh E, Chafin TB, Wahezi SE, Jassal N, Sayed D. The MOTION Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Objective Real-World Outcomes for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Patients Treated with the mild(R) Procedure: One-Year Results. Pain Med. 2022 Apr 8;23(4):625-634. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnac028.

    PubMed 35167700

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing MILD Procedure and Conventional Medical Management (CMM) in people with Spinal Stenosis, Lumbar Region, With Neurogenic Claudication, run by Vertos Medical, Inc. at 18 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 18 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 1 May 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mean Change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (time frame: Mean Change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) baseline to 12 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03610737, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Oct 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in