Sickle Cell DiseasePhase 3HESTIA3NCT03615924
Effect of Ticagrelor vs. Placebo in the Reduction of Vaso-occlusive Crises in Pediatric Patients With Sickle Cell Disease
A Phase 3 study testing Ticagrelor in people with Sickle Cell Disease, run by AstraZeneca at 55 sites in 16 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study is to Evaluate the Effect of Ticagrelor versus Placebo in Reducing the Rate of Vaso-Occlusive Crises in Paediatric Patients with Sickle Cell Disease Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 2 to 17 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Sickle Cell Disease
- What is being tested?
- Ticagrelor
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 193 participants
- Where
- 55 sitesin 16 countries
- Study dates
- 26 Sep 2018to 13 Aug 2020
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 2 to 17 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Provision of signed and dated informed consent prior to any study specific procedures not part of standard medical care (local regulations and international guidelines are to be followed in determining the assent/consent requirements for children).
- Male or female paediatric patients aged ≥2 to <18 years and body weight of ≥12 kg (at Visit 1), diagnosed with HbSS or HbS/β0 as confirmed by high-performance liquid chromatography or haemoglobin electrophoresis.
- Note: Diagnosis of SCD (if not confirmed prior to screening and records available on the medical file) should be confirmed for HbSS or HbS/β0 by high-performance liquid chromatography or haemoglobin electrophoresis, performed at the site's local lab, in order to confirm the type of mutation.
- Have experienced at least 2 VOCs (painful crisis and/or ACS) as judged by the Investigator in the past 12 months prior to Visit 1. These VOCs need to be documented in the patient's medical records or in other documents that can be reconciled.
- If ≤16 years old, must have had transcranial Doppler (TCD) within the past year prior to Visit 1. If this is not the case, a TCD examination must be done before proceeding in the study.
- If ≥10 years old, must have had an ophthalmological examination within the past year prior to Visit 1. If this is not the case, the patient must be examined by an ophthalmologist before proceeding in the study. If local guidelines dictate ophthalmological examination at younger ages, those local guidelines should be followed.
Show all 10Show fewer
- If treated with hydroxyurea, the weight-adjusted dose must be stable for 3 months before screening.
- Suitable venous access for the study-related blood sampling
- Prior to dosing on day of randomisation (Visit 2), a negative urine (dipstick) pregnancy test performed at Screening (Visit 1) and at Visit 2 must be available for female patients of childbearing potential.
- Females of childbearing potential (after menarche) must not become pregnant during study. Sexually active females must use a highly effective method of contraception which results in a low failure rate (ie, less than 1% per year). If use of effective contraception cannot be secured in sexually active females, the patient cannot be included in this study.
Who cannot join
- History of transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or cerebrovascular accident (ischaemic or haemorrhagic), severe head trauma, intracranial haemorrhage, intracranial neoplasm, arteriovenous malformation, aneurysm, or proliferative retinopathy.
- Findings on TCD: Current or previous values for time averaged mean of the maximum velocity (TAMMV) that are Conditional or Abnormal. Patients with Conditional TAMMV values or higher (≥153 cm/sec using TCD imaging technique [TCDi] which is corresponding to ≥170 cm/sec by the non-imaging technique). Both the middle cerebral artery and the internal carotid artery should be considered.
- Any other criteria that would locally be considered as TCD indications for chronic transfusion would also exclude the patient.
- Active pathological bleeding or increased risk of bleeding complications according to Investigator
- Haemoglobin <6 g/dL from test performed at Screening (Visit 1)
- Platelets <100 x 10^9/L from test performed at Screening (Visit 1) Undergoing treatment with chronic red blood cell transfusion therapy.
Show all 21Show fewer
- Undergoing treatment with chronic red blood cell transfusion therapy.
- Chronic use of NSAIDs defined as continuous intake >3 days per week that cannot be discontinued
- Receiving chronic treatment with anticoagulants or antiplatelet drugs that cannot be discontinued
- Moderate or severe hepatic impairment defined as laboratory values of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >2 × upper limits of normal (ULN), total bilirubin >2 × ULN (unless judged by the Investigator to be caused by haemolysis), albumin <35 g/L (3.5 g/dL) and International normalised ratio (INR) >1.4, or symptoms of liver disease (eg, ascites) from test performed at Screening (Visit 1).
- Renal failure requiring dialysis
- Patient considered to be at risk of bradycardic events (eg, known sick sinus syndrome or second or third degree atrioventricular block) unless already treated with a permanent pacemaker.
- Concomitant oral or intravenous therapy with strong or moderate cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) inhibitors, CYP3A substrates with narrow therapeutic indices, or strong CYP3A inducers, which cannot be stopped at least 5 half-lives before randomisation.
- Active untreated malaria. Patients with suspected malaria at Screening (Visit 1) will be tested.
- Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to ticagrelor
- Patients who are currently pregnant or breastfeeding, or planning to become pregnant during the study or have given birth less than 3 months prior to Screening (Visit 1)
- Any condition which, in the opinion of the Investigator, would make it unsafe or unsuitable for the patient to participate in this study
- Concern for the inability of the patient or caregiver (defined as legally authorized representative) to comply with study procedures and/or follow-up
- Previous randomisation in the present study.
- Participation in another clinical study with an IP or device during the last 30 days preceding screening.
- Involvement of member of patient's family, or patient self, in the planning and/or conduct of the study (applies to both AstraZeneca staff and/or staff at the study site).
Trial locations and contacts
55 sites in 16 countries.
55 sites in 16 countries
United States7 sites
Research Site
Brooklyn, New York, 11212
Research Site
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
Research Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Research Site
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33316
Research Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89135
Research Site
Miami, Florida, 33155
Research Site
Oak Lawn, Illinois, 60453
Egypt6 sites
Research Site
Al Sharkeya, 44519
Research Site
Alexandria, 21131
Research Site
Cairo, 11521
Research Site
Cairo, 11566
Research Site
Cairo, 12655
Research Site
Dakahlia, 35516
India6 sites
Research Site
Mumbai, 400053
Research Site
Nagpur, 440003
Research Site
Nagpur, 440012
Research Site
Pune, 411001
Research Site
Pune, 411004
Research Site
Wardha, 442004
Brazil5 sites
Research Site
Porto Alegre, 90035-903
Research Site
Rio de Janeiro, 20211-080
Research Site
Salvador, 41253-190
Research Site
São Paulo, 01221010
Research Site
São Paulo, 08270-070
Italy4 sites
Research Site
Catania, 95123
Research Site
Naples, 80138
Research Site
Padova, 35128
Research Site
Verona, 37126
Spain4 sites
Research Site
Barakaldo, 48903
Research Site
Barcelona, 08035
Research Site
Madrid, 28007
Research Site
Madrid, 28009
United Kingdom4 sites
Research Site
Cardiff, CF14 4XW
Research Site
Glasgow, G51 4TF
Research Site
London, E1 1BB
Research Site
London, SE1 7EH
Ghana3 sites
Research Site
Accra, 233
Research Site
Ho, 0
Research Site
Kumasi, 1934
Kenya3 sites
Research Site
Kisumu, 40100
Research Site
Nairobi, 00200
Research Site
Siaya, 40600
Turkey (Türkiye)3 sites
Research Site
Antalya, 7070
Research Site
Mersin, 33343
Research Site
Seyhan, 01130
South Africa2 sites
Research Site
Cape Town, 7700
Research Site
Soweto, 2013
About this study
Official title: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Multicentre, Phase III Study to Evaluate the Effect of Ticagrelor Versus Placebo in Reducing the Rate of Vaso-Occlusive Crises in Paediatric Patients With Sickle Cell Disease (HESTIA3)
The purpose of the study is to Evaluate the Effect of Ticagrelor versus Placebo in Reducing the Rate of Vaso-Occlusive Crises in Paediatric Patients with Sickle Cell Disease
Read the detailed description
Hestia3 will evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of ticagrelor versus placebo in children with SCD during treatment for at least 12 months and up to approximately 24 months.
- The target population are children aged ≥2 to <18 years of age and body weight of ≥12 kg diagnosed with HbSS or HbS/β0 confirmed by high-performance liquid chromatography or hemoglobin electrophoresis. At least 50 evaluable patients should be recruited in each of the age groups, ≥2 years to <12 years and ≥12 years to <18 years.
- To be eligible for the study, patients must have experienced at least 2 VOCs (defined as painful crisis and/or ACS) events in the past 12 months prior to Visit 1, indicating that the severity of the patient's disease justifies preventive chronic long-term treatment. The intent is to enroll only children aged 2 years or above, since VOCs become more frequent with age.
- Study participants should receive standard of care for SCD, adjusted to the individual patient at the discretion of the investigator, including routine health care screening examinations and immunizations according to local guidelines and health care programmers. Study drug will be given on the background of standard treatments for SCD. Study participants are not withheld from any other treatments that may be used in SCD (eg., hydroxyurea) during the trial, which is important considering the use of a placebo control group. However, restrictions apply to some medications and interventions that may be necessary for the patient's health and well-being during the study.
- Patients are to be followed up to 24 months or until a common study end date is reached defined as 12 months after the last patient is randomised. The expected average follow-up is 18 months. Considering inclusion of patients with at least 2 VOC events in the past year, this treatment duration is considered long enough to evaluate effects on VOC events as well as to capture safety and tolerability data supporting a potential future long term use of ticagrelor.
- Due to ticagrelor mechanism of action and the potential to reduce symptoms caused by ischemia during a vaso-occlusion, a composite endpoint with painful crises and/or ACS has been selected for the primary endpoint. Painful crisis is the most common reason for emergency department visits for patients with SCD with a significant impact on young patients' lives, affecting them physically and emotionally. Secondary endpoints are included to broaden the understanding of effects in patients with SCD and to also assess potential benefits on symptomatic disease burden and health-related quality of life (HRQL).
- Patients will be treated with 15, 30 and 45 mg bd or matching placebo, depending on body weight.
- Conditions
- Sickle Cell Disease
- Being tested
- Ticagrelor, Placebo
- Keywords
- Sickle Cell Disease, Sickle Cell Anemia, SCD, Platelet aggregation, Ticagrelor, Brilinta, VOC, Vaso-Occlusive Crises, ACS, painful crisis
- Medical subject headings
- Anemia, Sickle Cell, Vaso-Occlusive Crises
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TicagrelorDrug
The double-blinded study drug dose will be weight dependent:
- ≥12 to ≤24kg: Ticagrelor 15 mg, twice a day
- >24 to ≤48 kg: Ticagrelor 30 mg, twice a day
- >48 kg: Ticagrelor 45 mg, twice a day.
PlaceboDrug
The double-blinded study drug dose will be weight dependent:
- ≥12 to ≤24kg: Placebo to match ticagrelor 15 mg, twice a day
- >24 to ≤48 kg: Placebo to match ticagrelor 30 mg, twice a day
- >48 kg: Placebo to match ticagrelor 45 mg, twice a day.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ticagrelor | Experimental | The double-blinded study drug dose will be weight dependent:
* ≥12 to ≤24kg: Ticagrelor 15 mg, twice a day
* >24 to ≤48 kg: Ticagrelor 30 mg, twice a day
* >48 kg: Ticagrelor 45 mg, twice a day. Receives: Drug: Ticagrelor |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | The double-blinded study drug dose will be weight dependent:
* ≥12 to ≤24kg: Placebo to match ticagrelor 15 mg, twice a day
* >24 to ≤48 kg: Placebo to match ticagrelor 30 mg, twice a day
* >48 kg: Placebo to match ticagrelor 45 mg, twice a day. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Vaso-Occlusive Crisis Events
A VOC is the composite of a painful crisis and/or an acute chest syndrome (ACS) event. The number of VOC events is defined as the count of VOC events experienced by a participant throughout the treatment period.
Measured: From randomization (Day 0) up to end of study (EOS) visit or date of premature study discontinuation, up to approximately 20 months
Secondary outcomes (17)
Number of Painful Crisis Events
A painful crisis is an onset or worsening of pain that lasts at least 2 hours, for which there is no explanation other than vaso-occlusion and which requires therapy with oral or parenteral opioids, parenteral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or other analgesics prescribed by a healthcare provider in a medical setting (such as a hospital, clinic or emergency room visit) or at home. Events with an onset date <=7 days of the previous event onset date are not counted as new events.
Measured: From randomization (Day 0) up to EOS visit or date of premature study discontinuation, up to approximately 20 months
Number of Acute Chest Syndrome Events
The ACS is an acute illness characterized by fever and/or respiratory symptoms, accompanied by a new pulmonary infiltrate on a chest X-ray. Events with an onset date <=7 days of the previous event onset date are not counted as new events.
Measured: From randomization (Day 0) up to EOS visit or date of premature study discontinuation, up to approximately 20 months
Duration of Painful Crises
The duration of painful crises is defined as the sum of the duration of painful crises experienced by a participant over the defined treatment period. If two or more events have overlapping durations, the overlapping days were counted only once.
Measured: From randomization (Day 0) up to EOS visit or date of premature study discontinuation, up to approximately 20 months
Number of Vaso-Occlusive Crisis Events Requiring Hospitalization or Emergency Department Visits
The number of VOC events requiring hospitalization or emergency department visits is defined as the count of VOC events experienced by a participant over the treatment period, for which the primary setting for VOC treatment was in-patient hospitalization or emergency department. Events with an onset date <=7 days of the previous event onset date are not counted as new events.
Measured: From randomization (Day 0) up to EOS visit or date of premature study discontinuation, up to approximately 20 months
Number of Days Hospitalized for Vaso-Occlusive Crisis Events
The number of days hospitalized for all individual VOC events experienced by a participant during the treatment period is defined as the sum of the duration of all individual hospitalizations (taking into account potential overlapping hospitalization days of VOC components) during VOC events experienced by a participant over the treatment period for which the primary setting for VOC treatment was in-patient hospitalization.
Measured: From randomization (Day 0) up to EOS visit or date of premature study discontinuation, up to approximately 20 months
Number of Acute Sickle Cell Disease Complications
The number of acute SCD complications is defined as the count of all individual acute SCD complications experienced by a participant over the treatment period. Acute SCD complications are defined as any one or more of the following individual complications: Transient ischaemic attack/ischaemic stroke, hepatic sequestration, splenic sequestration, priapism, and dactylitis.
Measured: From randomization (Day 0) up to EOS visit or date of premature study discontinuation, up to approximately 20 months
Number of Days Hospitalized for Acute Sickle Cell Disease Complications
The number of days hospitalized for acute SCD complications is defined as the sum of the duration of all individual hospitalizations (taking into account potential overlapping hospitalization days) due to acute SCD complications experienced by a participant over the treatment period, for which hospitalization was reported.
Measured: From randomization (Day 0) up to EOS visit or date of premature study discontinuation, up to approximately 20 months
Number of Sickle Cell-Related Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusions
The number of participants with at least one sickle cell-related RBC transfusion reported. Adverse events resulting in the need for RBC transfusions were captured prior to database lock to determine if the transfusion was sickle cell-related or not.
Measured: From randomization (Day 0) up to EOS visit or date of premature study discontinuation, up to approximately 20 months
Health-Related Quality of Life Total Score Using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Sickle Cell Disease Module
The PedsQL SCD module instrument developed using a 5-point Likert scale (where 0= never and 4= almost always) for the participant self-report forms for ages ≥5 to <8 years, ≥8 to <13 years, and ≥13 to ≤18 years and the caregiver proxy-report form specific for ≥2 to <5 years was used. The PedsQL SCD module measures problems in the following categories:
- Pain: 3 sub-scales
- Worry: 2 sub-scales
- Emotions: 1 sub-scale
- Treatment: 1 sub-scale
- Communication: 2 sub-scales
- Total score PedsQL SCD module items were reverse-scored and linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale (0= 100, 1= 75, 2= 50, 3= 25, 4= 0) so that higher scores indicate better quality of life. To create the PedsQL SCD module total score (43/42/40 items - depending on version completed) the arithmetic mean of the transformed scores was computed as the sum of the items transformed scores divided by the number of items answered. Baseline values are the closest observation prior to and including the randomization visit.
Measured: For ages ≥2 to <5 years and ≥5 to <8 years: Baseline (observation prior to and including the randomization visit) and Months 6, and 12; For ages ≥8 to <13 years and ≥13 to ≤18 years: Baseline and Months 6, 12, and 18
Fatigue Total Score Using Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Multidimensional Fatigue Scale
The PedsQL multidimensional fatigue scale instrument developed using a 5-point Likert scale (where 0= never and 4= almost always) for the participant self-report forms for ages ≥5 to <8 years, ≥8 to <13 years, and ≥13 to ≤18 years and the caregiver proxy-report form specific for ≥2 to <5 years was used. The PedsQL multidimensional fatigue scale measures problems in the following categories:
- General (6 items)
- Sleep/rest (6 items)
- Cognitive fatigue (6 items)
- Total score (18 items) PedsQL multidimensional fatigue scale items were reverse-scored and linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale (0= 100, 1= 75, 2= 50, 3= 25, 4= 0) so that higher scores indicate better quality of life. To create the PedsQL multidimensional fatigue scale total score (18 items), the arithmetic mean of the transformed scores was computed as the sum of the items transformed scores divided by the number of items answered. Baseline values are closest observation prior to and including randomization visit.
Measured: For ages ≥2 to <5 years and ≥5 to <8 years: Baseline (observation prior to and including the randomization visit) and Months 6, and 12; For ages ≥8 to <13 years and ≥13 to ≤18 years: Baseline and Months 6, 12, and 18
Percentage of Days of Absence From School or Work Due to Sickle Cell Disease
For participants attending school/work at randomization, absence from school/work due to SCD was recorded weekly by the participant in the eDevice with the help of the caregiver if needed. The percentage of days absent from school/work due to SCD in the defined treatment period was calculated as follows:
Percentage of absent days = (total number of days reported)/(total number of questionnaires answered ×7).
Measured: From randomization (Day 0) up to EOS visit or date of premature study discontinuation, up to approximately 20 months
Average Intensity of Worst Pain Daily During Vaso-Occlusive Crisis Events in Participants <5 Years of Age
The Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale is caregiver-reported and used to assess pain daily during the VOC event for those participants <5 years of age as determined at randomization. Each of the 5 behaviours observed are assigned a score of 0, 1 or 2. The total FLACC score ranges between 0 and 10, with 0 representing "no pain" and 10 representing "very much pain". Lower score indicate better outcome. Worst pain ratings were collected once daily throughout the duration of the VOC event using an eDevice.
Measured: From randomization (Day 0) up to EOS visit or date of premature study discontinuation, up to approximately 20 months
Average Intensity of Worst Pain Daily During Vaso-Occlusive Crisis Events in Participants ≥5 Years of Age
The Faces Pain Scale-revised (FPS-R) was administered to assess pain daily during the VOC event by those participants aged ≥5 years as determined at randomization. The FPS-R consists of 6 faces and scoring ranges between 0 and 10 (with an increase in numeric value by 2), where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "very much pain". Lower score indicate better outcome. Worst pain ratings were collected once daily throughout the duration of the VOC event using an eDevice.
Measured: From randomization (Day 0) up to EOS visit or date of premature study discontinuation, up to approximately 20 months
Type of Analgesics Used by Participants During Vaso-Occlusive Crisis Events
Analgesics use (opioid and non-opioid) during VOC events.
Measured: From randomization (Day 0) up to EOS visit or date of premature study discontinuation, up to approximately 20 months
Palatability of the Study Treatment Assessed by Study Medication Palatability Assessment (SMPA) in Participants ≤4 Years of Age
Response to palatability was assessed through the SMPA question "Was any behaviour observed when the study medication was given to this participant that would be indicative of a negative response to the palatability of the study medication?". This was presented as a binary outcome (that is, where "No" is no negative response and "Yes" is negative response). No negative response was considered as a positive outcome.
Measured: Baseline (randomization visit) and Month 6
Swallowability of the Study Treatment Assessed by Study Medication Palatability Assessment in Participants ≤4 Years of Age
An observer's assessment of the participant's behaviour using the SMPA was performed for all participants taking the study treatment who are 2 to 4 years of age. Willingness to swallow was assessed and categorized as follows:
- Swallowed without a problem
- Some resistance but did swallow
- Spit out some/all of the medication
- Vomited up the medication. The category "swallowed without a problem" was considered as positive outcome.
Measured: Baseline (randomization visit) and Month 6
Palatability of the Study Treatment Assessed by Facial Hedonic Scale (FHS) in Participants ≥5 Years of Age
The FHS method was used for all participants taking the study treatment who are ≥5 years of age. The FHS consists of 5 faces with descriptions ranging from "Dislike very much" to "Like very much". The face with description "Like very much" was considered as positive outcome. The way in which the study treatment was taken, that is, whether the tablet is whole or dispersed, was captured.
Measured: Baseline (randomization visit) and Month 6
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Aug 2018
- Study start26 Sep 2018
- Primary completion13 Aug 2020
- Study completion13 Aug 2020
Why it stopped: Recommendation from an independent data monitoring committee (DMC) and accepted by AstraZeneca.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Sickle Cell DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by AstraZenecaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 193 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- AstraZeneca
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- IQVIA Pty Ltd
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Anders Berggren, MD, PhD, Study director, AstraZenecaMatthew Heeney, MD, Principal investigator, Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03615924
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- D5136C00009
- Acronym
- HESTIA3
- Status last verified
- Mar 2021
- First submitted
- 22 Jun 2018
- Last updated
- 9 Apr 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Qualified researchers can request access to anonymized individual patient-level data from AstraZeneca group of companies sponsored clinical trials via the request portal. All request will be evaluated as per the AZ disclosure commitment: https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure. Yes, indicates that AZ are accepting requests for IPD, but this does not mean all requests will be shared.
Publications
Heeney MM, Abboud MR, Githanga J, Inusa BPD, Kanter J, Michelson AD, Nduba V, Musiime V, Apte M, Inati A, Taksande AM, Andersson M, Astrand M, Maklad N, Niazi M, Himmelmann A, Berggren AR. Ticagrelor vs placebo for the reduction of vaso-occlusive crises in pediatric sickle cell disease: the HESTIA3 study. Blood. 2022 Sep 29;140(13):1470-1481. doi: 10.1182/blood.2021014095.
PubMed 35849650Heeney MM, Abboud MR, Amilon C, Andersson M, Githanga J, Inusa B, Kanter J, Leonsson-Zachrisson M, Michelson AD, Berggren AR; HESTIA3 study investigators. Ticagrelor versus placebo for the reduction of vaso-occlusive crises in pediatric sickle cell disease: Rationale and design of a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter phase 3 study (HESTIA3). Contemp Clin Trials. 2019 Oct;85:105835. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.105835. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
PubMed 31446143
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Apr 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Multicentre, Phase III Study to Evaluate the Effect of Ticagrelor Versus Placebo in Reducing the Rate of Vaso-Occlusive Crises in Paediatric Patients With Sickle Cell Disease (HESTIA3)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03615924
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HESTIA3 / D5136C00009
- Conditions
- Sickle Cell Disease
- Keywords
- Sickle Cell Disease, Sickle Cell Anemia, SCD, Platelet aggregation, Ticagrelor, Brilinta, VOC, Vaso-Occlusive Crises
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Recommendation from an independent data monitoring committee (DMC) and accepted by AstraZeneca.
- Enrolment
- 193 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AstraZenecaIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- IQVIA Pty Ltd
- Study start
- 26 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 13 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 13 Aug 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 9 Apr 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study is to Evaluate the Effect of Ticagrelor versus Placebo in Reducing the Rate of Vaso-Occlusive Crises in Paediatric Patients with Sickle Cell Disease
Detailed description
Hestia3 will evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of ticagrelor versus placebo in children with SCD during treatment for at least 12 months and up to approximately 24 months.
- The target population are children aged ≥2 to <18 years of age and body weight of ≥12 kg diagnosed with HbSS or HbS/β0 confirmed by high-performance liquid chromatography or hemoglobin electrophoresis. At least 50 evaluable patients should be recruited in each of the age groups, ≥2 years to <12 years and ≥12 years to <18 years.
- To be eligible for the study, patients must have experienced at least 2 VOCs (defined as painful crisis and/or ACS) events in the past 12 months prior to Visit 1, indicating that the severity of the patient's disease justifies preventive chronic long-term treatment. The intent is to enroll only children aged 2 years or above, since VOCs become more frequent with age.
- Study participants should receive standard of care for SCD, adjusted to the individual patient at the discretion of the investigator, including routine health care screening examinations and immunizations according to local guidelines and health care programmers. Study drug will be given on the background of standard treatments for SCD. Study participants are not withheld from any other treatments that may be used in SCD (eg., hydroxyurea) during the trial, which is important considering the use of a placebo control group. However, restrictions apply to some medications and interventions that may be necessary for the patient's health and well-being during the study.
- Patients are to be followed up to 24 months or until a common study end date is reached defined as 12 months after the last patient is randomised. The expected average follow-up is 18 months. Considering inclusion of patients with at least 2 VOC events in the past year, this treatment duration is considered long enough to evaluate effects on VOC events as well as to capture safety and tolerability data supporting a potential future long term use of ticagrelor.
- Due to ticagrelor mechanism of action and the potential to reduce symptoms caused by ischemia during a vaso-occlusion, a composite endpoint with painful crises and/or ACS has been selected for the primary endpoint. Painful crisis is the most common reason for emergency department visits for patients with SCD with a significant impact on young patients' lives, affecting them physically and emotionally. Secondary endpoints are included to broaden the understanding of effects in patients with SCD and to also assess potential benefits on symptomatic disease burden and health-related quality of life (HRQL).
- Patients will be treated with 15, 30 and 45 mg bd or matching placebo, depending on body weight.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ticagrelor | Experimental | Drug: TicagrelorThe double-blinded study drug dose will be weight dependent: * ≥12 to ≤24kg: Ticagrelor 15 mg, twice a day * >24 to ≤48 kg: Ticagrelor 30 mg, twice a day * >48 kg: Ticagrelor 45 mg, twice a day. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboThe double-blinded study drug dose will be weight dependent: * ≥12 to ≤24kg: Placebo to match ticagrelor 15 mg, twice a day * >24 to ≤48 kg: Placebo to match ticagrelor 30 mg, twice a day * >48 kg: Placebo to match ticagrelor 45 mg, twice a day. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 2 to 17 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Provision of signed and dated informed consent prior to any study specific procedures not part of standard medical care (local regulations and international guidelines are to be followed in determining the assent/consent requirements for children).
- Male or female paediatric patients aged ≥2 to <18 years and body weight of ≥12 kg (at Visit 1), diagnosed with HbSS or HbS/β0 as confirmed by high-performance liquid chromatography or haemoglobin electrophoresis.
- Note: Diagnosis of SCD (if not confirmed prior to screening and records available on the medical file) should be confirmed for HbSS or HbS/β0 by high-performance liquid chromatography or haemoglobin electrophoresis, performed at the site's local lab, in order to confirm the type of mutation.
- Have experienced at least 2 VOCs (painful crisis and/or ACS) as judged by the Investigator in the past 12 months prior to Visit 1. These VOCs need to be documented in the patient's medical records or in other documents that can be reconciled.
- If ≤16 years old, must have had transcranial Doppler (TCD) within the past year prior to Visit 1. If this is not the case, a TCD examination must be done before proceeding in the study.
Key exclusion criteria (21 listed)
- History of transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or cerebrovascular accident (ischaemic or haemorrhagic), severe head trauma, intracranial haemorrhage, intracranial neoplasm, arteriovenous malformation, aneurysm, or proliferative retinopathy.
- Findings on TCD: Current or previous values for time averaged mean of the maximum velocity (TAMMV) that are Conditional or Abnormal. Patients with Conditional TAMMV values or higher (≥153 cm/sec using TCD imaging technique [TCDi] which is corresponding to ≥170 cm/sec by the non-imaging technique). Both the middle cerebral artery and the internal carotid artery should be considered.
- Any other criteria that would locally be considered as TCD indications for chronic transfusion would also exclude the patient.
- Active pathological bleeding or increased risk of bleeding complications according to Investigator
- Haemoglobin <6 g/dL from test performed at Screening (Visit 1)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TicagrelorThe double-blinded study drug dose will be weight dependent: * ≥12 to ≤24kg: Ticagrelor 15 mg, twice a day * >24 to ≤48 kg: Ticagrelor 30 mg, twice a day * >48 kg: Ticagrelor 45 mg, twice a day. | Drug | Ticagrelor |
| PlaceboThe double-blinded study drug dose will be weight dependent: * ≥12 to ≤24kg: Placebo to match ticagrelor 15 mg, twice a day * >24 to ≤48 kg: Placebo to match ticagrelor 30 mg, twice a day * >48 kg: Placebo to match ticagrelor 45 mg, twice a day. | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Number of Vaso-Occlusive Crisis Events
Time frame: From randomization (Day 0) up to end of study (EOS) visit or date of premature study discontinuation, up to approximately 20 months
A VOC is the composite of a painful crisis and/or an acute chest syndrome (ACS) event. The number of VOC events is defined as the count of VOC events experienced by a participant throughout the treatment period.
17 secondary outcomes
Number of Painful Crisis Events
Time frame: From randomization (Day 0) up to EOS visit or date of premature study discontinuation, up to approximately 20 months
Number of Acute Chest Syndrome Events
Time frame: From randomization (Day 0) up to EOS visit or date of premature study discontinuation, up to approximately 20 months
Duration of Painful Crises
Time frame: From randomization (Day 0) up to EOS visit or date of premature study discontinuation, up to approximately 20 months
Number of Vaso-Occlusive Crisis Events Requiring Hospitalization or Emergency Department Visits
Time frame: From randomization (Day 0) up to EOS visit or date of premature study discontinuation, up to approximately 20 months
Number of Days Hospitalized for Vaso-Occlusive Crisis Events
Time frame: From randomization (Day 0) up to EOS visit or date of premature study discontinuation, up to approximately 20 months
Number of Acute Sickle Cell Disease Complications
Time frame: From randomization (Day 0) up to EOS visit or date of premature study discontinuation, up to approximately 20 months
Number of Days Hospitalized for Acute Sickle Cell Disease Complications
Time frame: From randomization (Day 0) up to EOS visit or date of premature study discontinuation, up to approximately 20 months
Number of Sickle Cell-Related Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusions
Time frame: From randomization (Day 0) up to EOS visit or date of premature study discontinuation, up to approximately 20 months
Health-Related Quality of Life Total Score Using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Sickle Cell Disease Module
Time frame: For ages ≥2 to <5 years and ≥5 to <8 years: Baseline (observation prior to and including the randomization visit) and Months 6, and 12; For ages ≥8 to <13 years and ≥13 to ≤18 years: Baseline and Months 6, 12, and 18
Fatigue Total Score Using Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Multidimensional Fatigue Scale
Time frame: For ages ≥2 to <5 years and ≥5 to <8 years: Baseline (observation prior to and including the randomization visit) and Months 6, and 12; For ages ≥8 to <13 years and ≥13 to ≤18 years: Baseline and Months 6, 12, and 18
Percentage of Days of Absence From School or Work Due to Sickle Cell Disease
Time frame: From randomization (Day 0) up to EOS visit or date of premature study discontinuation, up to approximately 20 months
Average Intensity of Worst Pain Daily During Vaso-Occlusive Crisis Events in Participants <5 Years of Age
Time frame: From randomization (Day 0) up to EOS visit or date of premature study discontinuation, up to approximately 20 months
Average Intensity of Worst Pain Daily During Vaso-Occlusive Crisis Events in Participants ≥5 Years of Age
Time frame: From randomization (Day 0) up to EOS visit or date of premature study discontinuation, up to approximately 20 months
Type of Analgesics Used by Participants During Vaso-Occlusive Crisis Events
Time frame: From randomization (Day 0) up to EOS visit or date of premature study discontinuation, up to approximately 20 months
Palatability of the Study Treatment Assessed by Study Medication Palatability Assessment (SMPA) in Participants ≤4 Years of Age
Time frame: Baseline (randomization visit) and Month 6
Swallowability of the Study Treatment Assessed by Study Medication Palatability Assessment in Participants ≤4 Years of Age
Time frame: Baseline (randomization visit) and Month 6
Palatability of the Study Treatment Assessed by Facial Hedonic Scale (FHS) in Participants ≥5 Years of Age
Time frame: Baseline (randomization visit) and Month 6
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Apr 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35849650Heeney MM, Abboud MR, Githanga J, Inusa BPD, Kanter J, Michelson AD, Nduba V, Musiime V, Apte M, Inati A, Taksande AM, Andersson M, Astrand M, Maklad N, Niazi M, Himmelmann A, Berggren AR. Ticagrelor vs placebo for the reduction of vaso-occlusive crises in pediatric sickle cell disease: the HESTIA3 study. Blood. 2022 Sep 29;140(13):1470-1481. doi: 10.1182/blood.2021014095.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31446143Heeney MM, Abboud MR, Amilon C, Andersson M, Githanga J, Inusa B, Kanter J, Leonsson-Zachrisson M, Michelson AD, Berggren AR; HESTIA3 study investigators. Ticagrelor versus placebo for the reduction of vaso-occlusive crises in pediatric sickle cell disease: Rationale and design of a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter phase 3 study (HESTIA3). Contemp Clin Trials. 2019 Oct;85:105835. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.105835. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
- Statistical Analysis Plan redactedLink provided by the sponsor.
- Clinical Study Protocol redactedLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Qualified researchers can request access to anonymized individual patient-level data from AstraZeneca group of companies sponsored clinical trials via the request portal. All request will be evaluated as per the AZ disclosure commitment: https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure. Yes, indicates that AZ are accepting requests for IPD, but this does not mean all requests will be shared.
Related trials for Sickle Cell Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Long-term Mitapivat Dosing in Subjects With Stable Sickle Cell Disease: An Extension of a Phase I Pilot Study of Mitapivat
Sickle Cell Disease, Hemolytic Anemia
RecruitingObservational study
HPC Offered for PRESERVE Expansion
Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT)
RecruitingPhase 1
Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Escalating Doses of Fostamatinib in Subjects With Stable Sickle Cell Disease
Sickle Cell Disorders, Sickle Cell Disease
RecruitingPhase 4
Clinical and Biomarker Effects of Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate in Females With Sickle Cell Disease
Sickle Cell Disease (SCD), Vaso-Occlusive Pain Episode in Sickle Cell Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Buprenorphine for the Management of Pain in Children With Sickle Cell Disease
Sickle Cell Disease (SCD), Sickle Cell Disease Vaso-occlusive Crisis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Anders Berggren, MD, PhD study director
AstraZeneca
Matthew Heeney, MD principal investigator
Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)
55 sites in 16 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Ticagrelor in people with Sickle Cell Disease, run by AstraZeneca at 55 sites in 16 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 21 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 55 sites in United States, Egypt, India, Brazil, Italy and 11 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Apr 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Vaso-Occlusive Crisis Events (time frame: From randomization (Day 0) up to end of study (EOS) visit or date of premature study discontinuation, up to approximately 20 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03615924, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Apr 2021.