PolyneuropathiesNCT03617185
Effect of Exercise and Surgical Weight Loss on Polyneuropathy
A study testing High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT), Routine Exercise and Bariatric surgery in people with Polyneuropathies and Obesity, run by University of Michigan at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this research study is to evaluate how exercise and surgical weight loss affect how likely an individual is to develop peripheral neuropathy and other neurologic complications. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Polyneuropathies, Obesity, Bariatric Surgery Candidate
- What is being tested?
- High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT), Routine Exercise and Bariatric surgery
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 140 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 27 Jul 2018to 1 Aug 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Attending a bariatric surgery clinic
- BMI > 35 with one comorbid condition present or BMI > 40 without comorbid conditions present
- Willing and capable to sign the Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved consent form and cooperate with the medical procedures for the study duration
- Willing to accept random treatment assignment to HIIT or routine exercise counseling
Who cannot join
- History of distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSP) from causes other than diabetes and/or the metabolic syndrome as determined through medical history, family history, history of medications, occupational history, history of exposure to toxins, physical and neurological examinations;
- Use of warfarin, heparin, or other anticoagulants, which would increase the risk of complications from skin biopsy
- Contraindication to HIIT participation including a failed exercise stress test
- Participation in an experimental medication trial within 3 months of starting the study
- Undergoing therapy for malignant disease other than basal-cell or squamous-cell skin cancer
- Medical or psychiatric reason for not being a surgical candidate
- Requiring a walking assist device;
- Currently smoking
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Effect of High Intensity Interval Training and Surgical Weight Loss on Distal Symmetric Polyneuropathy Outcomes
The purpose of this research study is to evaluate how exercise and surgical weight loss affect how likely an individual is to develop peripheral neuropathy and other neurologic complications.
Read the detailed description
The length of this study, including screening is approximately 24 months. Patients at Bariatric Surgery Clinics will be recruited for this study. Both patients that decide to undergo bariatric surgery, and those that do not undergo surgery will be enrolled. Patients will be randomized to either a high intensity interval training (HIIT) or standard exercise regimen after eligibility is confirmed and the baseline visit is complete. All patients will complete follow-up appointments at 3 month, 12 months and 24 months. Patients that are randomized to the HIIT program will compete 2 supervised and 1 unsupervised training sessions a week for 24 months.
- Conditions
- Polyneuropathies, Obesity, Bariatric Surgery Candidate
- Being tested
- High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT), Routine Exercise, Bariatric surgery
- Keywords
- Metabolic syndrome, Exercise
- Medical subject headings
- Polyneuropathies, Obesity, Metabolic Syndrome, Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT)Other
Patients will complete a HIIT training protocol of a total of 10 x 1 min intervals at 90% heart rate (HR) max. They will continue this training protocol, 3 sessions a week (2 supervised and 1 unsupervised), for 24 months.
Routine ExerciseOther
Patients will receive counseling regarding exercise as a routine part of their participation in the bariatric surgery clinic. Specifically, they are counseled to participate in 60 min of aerobic exercise daily in addition to 2-3 non-consecutive days of strength training workouts every wk. Patients are encouraged to contact the bariatric conditioning program, obtain a gym membership, purchase exercise equipment, join a walking group, and/or sign up for fitness classes (employer or city parks and recreation).
Bariatric surgeryProcedure or surgery
Patients will undergo bariatric surgery as part of their routine care
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Bariatric Surgery/HIIT | Active comparator | Patients who have undergone bariatric surgery will be randomized to this arm and will follow a high intensity interval training (HIIT) protocol for 24 months. Patients will complete 2 supervised HIIT sessions and 1 unsupervised HIIT session a week. Receives: Other: High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT); Procedure: Bariatric surgery |
| Bariatric Surgery/Routine Exercise | Active comparator | Patients who have undergone bariatric surgery will be randomized to this arm and will follow a standard routine exercise regimen for 24 months. Receives: Other: Routine Exercise; Procedure: Bariatric surgery |
| No Bariatric Surgery/HIIT | Active comparator | Patients who have not undergone bariatric surgery will be randomized to this arm and will follow a high intensity interval training (HIIT) protocol for 24 months. Patients will complete 2 supervised HIIT sessions and 1 unsupervised HIIT session a week. Receives: Other: High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) |
| No Bariatric Surgery/Routine Exercise | Active comparator | Patients who have not undergone bariatric surgery will be randomized to this arm and will follow a standard routine exercise regimen for 24 months. Receives: Other: Routine Exercise |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Intraepidermal Nerve Fiber Density (IENFD) at the Proximal Thigh
Intraepidermal Nerve Fiber Density (IENFD) as assessed by 3mm skin biopsies at the proximal thigh.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 12 months and 24 months
Secondary outcomes (34)
Intraepidermal Nerve Fiber Density (IENFD) at Distal Leg.
Intraepidermal Nerve Fiber Density (IENFD) as assessed by 3mm skin biopsies at the distal leg.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 12 months and 24 months
Corneal Confocal Microscopy (CCM) - Fiber Density
Non-invasive imaging technique of the corneal nerves to quantify nerve density and morphology.
Corneal Nerve Fiber Density are quantified by fibers/mm2, a higher number represents a higher density of fibers. Lower numbers indicate worse neuropathy.
Measured: Baseline, 3 month, 12 months and 24 months
Corneal Confocal Microscopy (CCM) - Branch Density
Non-invasive imaging technique of the corneal nerves to quantify nerve density and morphology.
Corneal Nerve Branch Density are quantified by branches/mm2, a higher number represents a higher density of branches. Lower numbers indicate worse neuropathy.
Measured: Baseline, 3 month, 12 months and 24 months
Corneal Confocal Microscopy (CCM) - Fiber Length
Non-invasive imaging technique of the corneal nerves to quantify nerve density and morphology.
Corneal Nerve Fiber Length are quantified by mm/mm2, a higher number represents a higher total length of fibers. Lower numbers indicate worse neuropathy .
Measured: Baseline, 3 month, 12 months and 24 months
Corneal Confocal Microscopy (CCM) - Tortuosity Coefficient
Non-invasive imaging technique of the corneal nerves to quantify nerve density and morphology.
Tortuosity Coefficient represents the total tortuosity (twisting/bending of nerves). As a coefficient the value is unitless, a higher value represents greater tortuosity. Lower numbers indicate worse neuropathy.
Measured: Baseline, 3 month, 12 months and 24 months
24-2 Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) - Mean Deviation
24-2 FDT was used to evaluate retinopathy using visual field deficits. Mean Deviation is presented below.
Mean deviation is the average difference from normal expected value in the patients' particular age group. Lower values indicate more visual deficit. Higher values indicate fewer visual deficit.
Measured: Baseline, 3 month, 12 months and 24 months
24-2 Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) - Foveal Sensitivity dB
24-2 FDT was used to evaluate retinopathy using visual field deficits. Foveal sensitivity is presented below.
Foveal sensitivity is the measurement of the fovea's light detection ability. Lower values suggest visual field deficits.
Measured: Baseline, 3 month, 12 months and 24 months
24-2 Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) - Pattern SD
24-2 FDT was used to evaluate retinopathy using visual field deficits. Pattern SD (PSD) is presented below.
PSD provides information about localized loss. A higher PSD indicates a non-uniform sensitivity loss and visual field deficit.
Measured: Baseline, 3 month, 12 months and 24 months
Retinal Fundus Photography
As assessed by fundus photographs, participants were identified as either having retinopathy or not having retinopathy. Data is shown as number of people with retinopathy at a particular study visit.
Measured: Baseline, 3 month, 12 months and 24 months
Nerve Conduction Study (NCS) - Latency
Latency measures the time in millisecond between stimulation and the recording electrode. Was performed on sural, peroneal, and tibial nerves. No response and abnormal values indicate neuropathy.
- Peroneal: 0 - No response, >6.5 - Abnormal
- Sural: 0 - No response, >4.5 - Abnormal
- Tibial: 0 - No response, >6.1 - Abnormal
Measured: Baseline and 24 months
Nerve Conduction Study (NCS) - Motor Amplitude
Amplitude measures the height of electrical signal (waveform) in millivolts produced by the stimulated motor nerve. Was performed on peroneal, and tibial nerves. No response and abnormal values indicate neuropathy.
- Peroneal: 0 - No response, < 1.1 - Abnormal
- Tibial: 0 - No response, <1.1 - Abnormal
Measured: Baseline and 24 months
Nerve Conduction Study (NCS) - Sensory Amplitude
Amplitude measures the height of electrical signal (waveform) in microvolts produced by the stimulated sensory nerve. Was performed on sural nerve. No response and abnormal values indicate neuropathy.
- Sural: 0 - No response, <4 - Abnormal
Measured: Baseline and 24 months
Nerve Conduction Study (NCS) - CV
Conduction velocity (V) measures the speed (m/s) at which the electrical impulse travels along the nerve. Was performed on peroneal nerves. No response and abnormal values indicate neuropathy. Abnormal values are <36 or 39, depending on whether certain criteria applied to the participant. Data was not analyzed separately.
Measured: Baseline and 24 months
Nerve Conduction Study (NCS) - F Wave Index
F wave index measures the time in millisecond between stimulation at a distal (near the muscle) point and for the stimulus to travel to the spinal cord and back, allowing to assess the entire length of the nerve.
Was performed on peroneal, and tibial nerves. No response and abnormal values indicate neuropathy.
- Peroneal: 0 - No response, >55 - Abnormal
- Tibial: 0 - No response, >55 - Abnormal
Measured: Baseline and 24 months
Cardiac Autonomic Neuropathy Testing-Deep Breathing/Exhalation to Inhalation (E:I) Ratio
Deep breathing/exhalation to inhalation (E:I) ratio were evaluated using PS monitor software. Values < 1 are abnormal, indicative of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy
Measured: Baseline and 24 months
Cardiac Autonomic Neuropathy Testing (30:15 Ratio)
Postural change-30:15 ratio was evaluated using PS monitor software. Values < 1 are abnormal, indicative of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy
Measured: Baseline and 24 months
Cardiac Autonomic Neuropathy Testing (Valsalva Ratio)
Valsalva ratio was evaluated using PS monitor software. Values <= 1.10 are abnormal, indicative of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy
Measured: Baseline and 24 months
Participants With Probable Polyneuropathy as Defined by the Toronto Definition of Probable Neuropathy
Toronto definition of probable neuropathy is having at least 2 out of 3 of the following: abnormal sensory examination, reflexes, and patient-reported symptoms. Data is reported as number of participants who, under the Toronto definition, were identified as having probable polyneuropathy.
Measured: 24 months
Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI)
MNSI questionnaire is scored from 0-15, score > 4 indicate neuropathy, higher scores indicate worse neuropathy.
A score of 1 point is given for answers of "yes" for questions 1-6, 8-12, 14, and 15 and "no" for questions 7 and 13.
Measured: Baseline, 3 month, 12 months and 24 months
Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) - Exam
MNSI exam is scored from 0-8, score >= 2.5 indicate neuropathy. Higher scores indicate worse neuropathy.
Measured: Baseline, 3 month, 12 months and 24 months
Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) - Index
The Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) index is a weighted composite score computed using the sum of the b-coefficients for all items within the MNSI questionnaire (15 questions) and MNSI exam (4 physical/visual exam).
Range: -0.93, 7.39 Values > 2.5407 are indicative of clinical neuropathy
Measured: Baseline, 3 month, 12 months and 24 months
Utah Early Neuropathy Score (UENS)
UENS is a composite score with five sections measuring multiple clinical measures of nerve injury. Sections are scored separately for each side (Right vs Left), and the total score is the sum across everything. Range: 0-42, higher score represents more severe polyneuropathy.
Measured: Baseline, 3 month, 12 months and 24 months
Modified Toronto Neuropathy Score (mTNS)
mTNS is a scale of 0-33 that measures neuropathy symptoms and exam findings. Higher scores indicate more severe polyneuropathy.
Measured: Baseline, 3 month, 12 months and 24 months
Survey of Autonomic Symptoms (SAS)
SAS evaluates the presence and magnitude of autonomic symptoms. Total impact score ranges from 0-60 (or up to 55 for participants to whom certain criteria did not apply). Higher score indicates worse autonomic neuropathy
Measured: Baseline, 3 month, 12 months and 24 months
Diabetic Neuropathy Score (DNS)
DNS is a questionnaire of neuropathy symptoms. Score ranges 0-4, >/=1 indicates polyneuropathy. 0 indicates no polyneuropathy.
Measured: Baseline, 3 month, 12 months and 24 months
Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire
Sum of the sensory score (0-30) and affective score (0-15) for a total score of 0-45. A higher score represents greater pain present.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months
Numerical Rating Scale for Pain
Participant reported pain scale with range 0-10, higher score indicates more pain.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months
Neuropathy Quality of Life (NeuroQOL)
Neuropathy Quality of Life (NeuroQOL) evaluates symptoms and function in regard to quality of life over the past four weeks. Range 1-15, higher score indicates neuropathy having a greater impact on quality of life.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 12 months, and 24 months
8 Foot Get Up and Go Test
This test measures in seconds how long it takes the participant to stand up from a seated position, walk around a cone places 8 feet away, and return to the chair and sit down. Less time indicates better speed, agility, and balance when moving.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 12 months, and 24 months
Berg Balance Scale
Berg Balance Scale measures participants' ability to balance and avoid falls. Scores range from 0-56, higher score indicates less likely to fall.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 12 months, and 24 months
Modified Falls Efficacy Scale - Fall Evaluation
Patient response indicating if they have fallen in the last year. Data is shown as number of people who have fallen in the last year.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 12 months, and 24 months
Neurothesiometer
Neurothesiometer is placed on the bottom of the great toe, and slowly increased until participant reports they can feel the vibration. The greater the microns, the less feeling the participant has, suggestive of worse sensory function.
Value > 25 Microns is indicative of neuropathy. There is no known maximum range. Lower values indicate better sensory function.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 12 months, and 24 months
NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery
NIH Toolbox Cognition Fluid (Range: 0-100) - Composite score derived as an average across five cognitive domains.
It's a fully adjusted T-score comparing the participant to a nationally representative sample, stratified by age and other demographics.
Individual domain scores are fully adjusted T score with range 0-100 and measures the following-
- Inhibitory Control and Attention - executive function, attention .
- Dimensional Change Card Sort - executive function
- Picture Sequence Memory - episodic memory
- List Sorting Working Memory - working memory
- Pattern Comparison - processing speed
A T-score of 50 represents the population mean. A score of 60 indicates that the participant is 1 SD above the national average for individuals with similar demographic characteristics
Higher scores reflect better cognitive functionality. No set clinical threshold, scores above mean indicate above average cognition for a given age group.
Measured: Baseline and at 24 months
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test
Used to evaluate verbal learning and memory using a list of 15 unrelated words presented to the participant over repeat trial.
Includes 3 independent scales:
- Auditory Learning (Total recall) - Measures memory and learning ability. Raw score range (0- 75)
- Delayed Recall - Measures long term memory retention. Raw score range (0-15)
- Recognition - Measures ability to recognize previously learned information. Raw score range (0-15).
- Raw scores were converted to age-standardized Z-scores using 10-year age bands (e.g., 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, etc.), with a mean of 0 and standard deviation of 1.
- A Z-score of 0 represents the population mean
- For each scale, scores above 0 are better. Standard deviations above the mean indicates a better learning and memory ability for a given age group.
No set clinical threshold, scores above mean indicate above average cognition for a given age group.
Measured: Baseline and at 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Aug 2018
- Study start27 Jul 2018
- Primary completion1 Aug 2024
- Study completion1 Aug 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PolyneuropathiesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of MichiganThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Patients will be assigned to one of 4 arms, bariatric surgery/HIIT, bariatric surgery/routine exercise, no bariatric surgery/HIIT, no bariatric surgery/routine exercise.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 140 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Michigan
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Brian Callaghan, University of Michigan
- Investigators
- Brian C Callaghan, MD, MS, Principal investigator, University of Michigan, Department of Neurology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03617185
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HUM00143541
- Other IDs
- 1R01DK115687-01A1
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 14 Jul 2018
- Last updated
- 17 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Reynolds EL, Koenig F, Watanabe M, Kwiatek A, Elafros MA, Stino A, Henderson D, Herrmann DN, Feldman EL, Callaghan BC. Comparison of intraepidermal nerve fiber density and confocal corneal microscopy for neuropathy. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2024 Dec;11(12):3115-3124. doi: 10.1002/acn3.52218. Epub 2024 Oct 12.
PubMed 39394845