Female Reproductive ProblemIMAGINENCT03617354
The Implementation of MinimAlly Invasive Hysterectomy Trial
An observational study of Female Reproductive Problem, run by Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer at 4 sites in Australia.
Trial summary
Removal of the uterus (hysterectomy) is the most commonly performed major gynaecological procedure in women. Obstetricians and gynaecologist (O\&G) surgeons conduct the majority of hysterectomies. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Female Reproductive Problem
- What is being tested?
- Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesAustralia
- Study dates
- 29 Mar 2017to 31 Dec 2022
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Trainee gynaecologists
Surgical training program participants Inclusion criteria
- RANZCOG accredited O\&G specialists who are proficient in RANZCOG laparoscopic skills level 3 or higher;
- Surgical capabilities will be assessed using The Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) Tool which is an adapted GOALS tool for hysterectomy. GOALS measures depth perception, bimanual dexterity, efficiency, tissue handling and surgeon autonomy each on a 5 point Likert scale. An experienced mentor will assess each surgeon using this scale and skills will be validated against objective outcomes (surgical adverse events recorded in the baseline period).
- Will be able to attend each of the 10 training days. -
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country.
Australia4 sites
Redcliffe Hospital
Brisbane, Queensland, 4020
Cairns Hospital
Cairns, Queensland, 4870
Ipswich Hospital
Ipswich, Queensland, 4305
Mackay Base Hospital
Mackay, Queensland, 4740
About this study
Official title: A Stepped Wedge Cluster Trial to Implement and Evaluate a Model for Training Practising Gynaecologists in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
Removal of the uterus (hysterectomy) is the most commonly performed major gynaecological procedure in women. Obstetricians and gynaecologist (O\&G) surgeons conduct the majority of hysterectomies. Surgical approaches to removal of the uterus include laparoscopic hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy with or without laparoscopic assistance and open hysterectomy through an abdominal incision. It is widely accepted that laparoscopic hysterectomy and vaginal hysterectomy are less invasive procedures, cause fewer surgical complications, less postoperative pain, require a shorter hospital stay and are associated with quicker recovery than abdominal hysterectomy. In Australia and despite the evidence, Total Abdominal Hysterectomy (TAH) rates are unreasonably high (~40%) and only 13% of all hysterectomies are done via Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy (TLH) in Australia.
This study aims to implement and evaluate a training program in TLH for gynaecologists. The potential benefits to the community are:
- A reduction in the incidence of overall surgical adverse events in patients receiving a hysterectomy
- A reduction in the length of hospital stay for patients requiring a hysterectomy
- A reduction in the direct hospital costs for hysterectomy
- Conditions
- Female Reproductive Problem
- Being tested
- Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Total Laparoscopic HysterectomyProcedure or surgery
The trainee gynaecologists are undertaking a training program in performing Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Trainee Gynaecologists | 1. RANZCOG accredited O\&G specialists who are proficient in RANZCOG laparoscopic skills level 3 or higher;
2. Surgical capabilities will be assessed using The Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) Tool which is an adapted GOALS tool for hysterectomy. GOALS measures depth perception, bimanual dexterity, efficiency, tissue handling and surgeon autonomy each on a 5 point Likert scale. An experienced mentor will assess each surgeon using this scale and skills will be validated against objective outcomes (surgical adverse events recorded in the baseline period).
3. Will be able to attend each of the 10 training days. Receives: Procedure: Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in proportion of hysterectomy
proportion of hysterectomies performed abdominally through TAH comparing pre-intervention baseline and post-intervention rates
Measured: 36 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
Adverse Events
conversion from TLH to TAH, any anaesthetic incident, intraoperative visceral injury, red cell transfusions, hospital stay greater than 7 days, incidental finding of a malignancy, unplanned readmission, ICU admission or return to theatre, postoperative PE or DVT, development of a fistula, vault haematoma, vaginal vault dehiscence or pelvic infection
Measured: 36 months
Length of hospital stays
days
Measured: 36 months
Cost effectiveness
Cost effectiveness via assessment of: theatre staffing costs; equipment and consumables; Medicare Benefits Schedule items for surgical and anaesthetics fees; costs of health services used after surgery; costs of bed-days; and costs due to readmissions or visits to the emergency department.
Measured: 36 months
Trainee Surgeon proficiency with Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
Proficiency is assessed using the Laparoscopic Competency Assessment Tool (L-CAT)
Measured: 36 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Aug 2018
- Study start29 Mar 2017
- Primary completion31 Dec 2021
- Study completion31 Dec 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Female Reproductive ProblemStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Andreas Obermair, Study chair, Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03617354
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IMAGINE
- Acronym
- IMAGINE
- Status last verified
- Apr 2023
- First submitted
- 24 Jul 2018
- Last updated
- 18 Apr 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Obermair A, Armfield NR, Graves N, Gebski V, Hanna GB, Coleman MG, Hughes A, Janda M. How to train practising gynaecologists in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: protocol for the stepped-wedge IMAGINE trial. BMJ Open. 2019 May 9;9(5):e027155. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027155.
PubMed 31072858
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Apr 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Stepped Wedge Cluster Trial to Implement and Evaluate a Model for Training Practising Gynaecologists in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03617354
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IMAGINE / IMAGINE
- Conditions
- Female Reproductive Problem
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Queensland Centre for Gynaecological CancerOther government
- Study start
- 29 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Removal of the uterus (hysterectomy) is the most commonly performed major gynaecological procedure in women. Obstetricians and gynaecologist (O\&G) surgeons conduct the majority of hysterectomies. Surgical approaches to removal of the uterus include laparoscopic hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy with or without laparoscopic assistance and open hysterectomy through an abdominal incision. It is widely accepted that laparoscopic hysterectomy and vaginal hysterectomy are less invasive procedures, cause fewer surgical complications, less postoperative pain, require a shorter hospital stay and are associated with quicker recovery than abdominal hysterectomy. In Australia and despite the evidence, Total Abdominal Hysterectomy (TAH) rates are unreasonably high (~40%) and only 13% of all hysterectomies are done via Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy (TLH) in Australia.
This study aims to implement and evaluate a training program in TLH for gynaecologists. The potential benefits to the community are:
- A reduction in the incidence of overall surgical adverse events in patients receiving a hysterectomy
- A reduction in the length of hospital stay for patients requiring a hysterectomy
- A reduction in the direct hospital costs for hysterectomy
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Trainee Gynaecologists | – | Procedure: Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy1. RANZCOG accredited O\&G specialists who are proficient in RANZCOG laparoscopic skills level 3 or higher; 2. Surgical capabilities will be assessed using The Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) Tool which is an adapted GOALS tool for hysterectomy. GOALS measures depth perception, bimanual dexterity, efficiency, tissue handling and surgeon autonomy each on a 5 point Likert scale. An experienced mentor will assess each surgeon using this scale and skills will be validated against objective outcomes (surgical adverse events recorded in the baseline period). 3. Will be able to attend each of the 10 training days. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Trainee gynaecologists
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Total Laparoscopic HysterectomyThe trainee gynaecologists are undertaking a training program in performing Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy | Procedure or surgery | Trainee Gynaecologists |
Primary outcome
Change in proportion of hysterectomy
Time frame: 36 months
proportion of hysterectomies performed abdominally through TAH comparing pre-intervention baseline and post-intervention rates
4 secondary outcomes
Adverse Events
Time frame: 36 months
Length of hospital stays
Time frame: 36 months
Cost effectiveness
Time frame: 36 months
Trainee Surgeon proficiency with Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
Time frame: 36 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Apr 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31072858Obermair A, Armfield NR, Graves N, Gebski V, Hanna GB, Coleman MG, Hughes A, Janda M. How to train practising gynaecologists in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: protocol for the stepped-wedge IMAGINE trial. BMJ Open. 2019 May 9;9(5):e027155. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027155.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Female Reproductive Problem
RecruitingObservational study
Female Reproductive Health in Canadian Armed Forces
Pregnancy, Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Andreas Obermair study chair
Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Female Reproductive Problem, run by Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer at 4 sites in Australia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Apr 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in proportion of hysterectomy (time frame: 36 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03617354, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Apr 2023.