Accidental FallsNCT03619200
FallSensing, a Multifactorial Screening Tool for Fall-risk in Community-dwelling Adults Aged 50 Years or Over
An observational study of Accidental Falls, run by Anabela Correia Martins.
Trial summary
FallSensing screening tool is a technological solution for fall risk screening, including a software, a pressure platform and two inertial sensors. The screening includes questions about demographic and anthropometric data, health and lifestyle behaviors, a detailed explanation about procedures to accomplish six… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Accidental Falls
- How many people
- 506 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 22 Jun 2016to 16 Jan 2018
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 years and older
- All sexes
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Individuals are voluntarily recruited from several settings from the community, in different regions of continental Portugal, such as parish councils, physical therapy clinics, senior's universities and other facilities.
Who may be able to join
- adults aged 50 years or over,
- Community-dweller
- independent to be standing and walking, with or without walking aids
- interest to participate in the study.
Who cannot join
- severe sensorial impairments (deafness or blindness)
- cognitive impairments which precludes the ability to comprehend the questionnaires and functional tests included in the screening protocol
About this study
FallSensing screening tool is a technological solution for fall risk screening, including a software, a pressure platform and two inertial sensors. The screening includes questions about demographic and anthropometric data, health and lifestyle behaviors, a detailed explanation about procedures to accomplish six functional tests (Grip Strength, Timed Up and Go, 30 seconds Sit-to-Stand, Step test, 4 Stage Balance test "modified" and 10 meters Walking Speed) and three questionnaires concerning environmental home hazards, activities and participation profile related to mobility and self-efficacy for exercise.
Read the detailed description
Variable: History of Fall (HoF) A fall can be defined as "an unexpected event in which the participant comes to rest on the ground, floor, or lower level" and "excludes coming to rest against furniture, wall, or other structure" .
The HoF within the previous 12 months will be determined by self-report, answering the question "Did you fall in the past 12 months? Yes-No". If the participant has fallen, it will be asked if the fall was outdoor or indoor, the reason of the fall (slip, stumble, loss of consciousness, dizziness, lower extremities weakness, no special reason and other), need of health services assistance, which health service (hospital, primary health care centre), hospitalization (how many days), activities limitation and restrictions on participation (how many days) and fractures occurrence (wrist or hand, hip, skull or spine, others).
Variable: History of falls after 12 months Participants will be prospectively followed for a 12-month period, via monthly phone calls, in order to record the falls occurrence. The rate of falls will be recorded from the day of inclusion until voluntary dropout, loss of phone contact or the end of the follow-up period (365 days later).
Variable: Fear of Falling (FoF) FoF is defined as "a lasting concern about falling that leads to an individual avoiding activities that he/she remains capable of performing".
Considering the negative influence of FoF, its existence will be assessed by self-report through the question "Are you afraid of falling? Yes - No".
Variable: Health Conditions There are certain conditions that can have a significant effect on fall rates among older adults, such as bladder incontinence, osteoarthritis, Parkinson's disease, cardiovascular accidents and conditions associated with cardiovascular disease, like hypertension.
The question "Do you have trouble seeing well or it has been past more than 2 years since your eyes have been tested?", once changes in visual acuity, development of cataracts, macular degeneration, glaucoma, and other conditions related to the aging process contribute to risk of falling.
Variable: Medication Older adults taking more than three or four medicines were found to be at increased risk of recurrent falls.
The number of medicines taken by each person was assessed by self-report through the question "Do you take 4 or more different medicines per day? Yes-No". The name of the medicines was also registered and they were identified according to their pharmaceutical group (benzodiazepines, antidepressants, antipsychotics, anti-inflammatory drugs, antihypertensive drugs and others drugs).
Variable: Sedentary Behavior In order to understand the community-dwelling adults' sedentary behavior by using a self-reported question, it was adopted the estimate measure of sedentariness calculated by Heseltine et al. (2015): "Do you spend over 4 hours seated, 5 days or more per week?".
Variable: Upper Extremities Assistance to Stand from a Chair The upper extremities assistance to stand from a chair was assessed through the question "Do you need assistance from the upper extremities to stand up from a chair? Yes-No", once it is assumed that is a sign of weak lower extremities muscles, a major reason for falling.
Variable: Living settings Since FoF is more frequent among older adults living alone, this protocol intends to assess the living settings through the question "Do you live alone? Yes-No".
Variable: Alcohol habits Regular alcohol consumption among older adults has been linked to impaired balance and postural hypotension, which has been associated with frequent falls.
The participants will be asked about their daily alcohol habits, "Do you drink alcohol every day? Yes-No".
Variable: Self-Perceived Health The self-perceived health (SPH) is considered a valid and reliable indicator of overall health status, a predictor of mortality and health services use.
SPH will be assessed by self-report through the question "In general, do you perceived your health as excellent, very good, good, sufficient or poor?"
Variable: Unintentional or involuntary weight loss The involuntary weight loss is one of the features that, simultaneously with others, can help to define a frailty phenotype.
The literature reveals an association between the frailty phenotype and the number of previous falls in older people. The participants will be asked if they had experienced a weight loss higher than ≥4,5kg or ≥5% of body weight during the previous 12 months.
Variable: Grip Strength The hand grip strength is significantly correlated with lower limb muscular strength, being a powerful predictor of disability, morbidity and mortality.
This test will be performed with the person seated on a standard chair without armrests, shoulder adducted and neutrally rotated, elbow flexed at 90 degrees, forearm neutral, wrist held between 0-15 degrees of ulnar deviation and with the arm not supported. A Jamar™ Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer will be settled at the second handle position, held with the dominant hand, and during the performance of the test will be presented vertically in line with the forearm. The test is performed only one time and the person is encouraged to exert her/his maximal grip strength for 5 seconds. The final score is measured in kilograms force (kgf). Normative data for this test are commonly analysed by gender, with males showing higher grip strength at all ages. A score below 15 kgf, for women, and 21 kgf, for men, identify those with higher risk of falling.
Variable:Timed Up and Go Timed Up and Go test (TUG) is used to assess dynamic balance during gait and transfers tasks, mobility and lower body strength. To perform this test, the person, wearing his/her regular footwear, is instructed to sit on a standard chair (chair height between 44 and 47 cm) with his/her back against the chair back, to stand up and walk straight for 3 meters as fast as possible, turn around, walk back and sit down. The person must stand up without help (cannot use the upper extremities for support), however if a walking aid is needed it should be placed next to the chair and can be used to perform the gait component of the test. The test is performed only one time, the timing begins at the instruction "go" and stops when the patient seats on the chair. A score higher than 10 seconds will indicate which community-dwelling older adults are more likely to be fallers.
Variable: 30 seconds Sit-to-Stand Lower body strength is a significant element to maintaining functional capacity in older adults, therefore its evaluation is critical. 30 seconds Sit-to-Stand (STS), being a simple and effective instrument for assessing lower body strength and identifying muscle weakness in community-dwelling older adults, is one of the most important functional evaluation clinical tests. The person is instructed to perform cycles of sits and stands up from a chair, as many times as possible over 30 seconds.
The person starts the test seated in the middle of the chair (chair height between 40 and 43,3cm), feet approximately shoulder-width apart and placed on the floor, and arms crossed by the wrists placed against the chest. The vocal instruction "go" sets the test´s beginning and if the participant completes more than halfway up at the end of 30 seconds it is counted as a full stand. Final score involves recording the number of stands a person can complete in 30 seconds. The normative levels for number of stands depends on age and gender.
Variable: Step Test The step test, was designed to assess the dynamic standing balance and reproduces lower-extremity motor control and coordination.
In order to perform the test, the person is asked to step on and off a block (7,5 cm height, 55 cm width, 35cm depth), placed against a wall, as many times as possible during 15 seconds. The whole foot is required to step onto the block and then return it fully to the ground. The total number of completed steps in 15 seconds is recorded. The patient is unsupported and should look straight forward, although investigator must stand close by for safety. In the case of patient overbalanced or need stabilization during the test, counting of steps stops and it is recorded the complete number of steps prior to overbalancing. This test is performed only for the dominant side, indicated by the person. A performance lower than 10 steps indicates higher risk of falling.
4 Stage Balance Test "Modified" Deficits in balance can lead to falls and fall related injuries, representing one of the most important intrinsic fall risk factors among older adults, being commonly assessed in this population.
The 4 Stage Balance Test "modified" is one of the tests available to evaluate balance. In order to complete this test, the person needs to progressively accomplish four different feet positions: side by side stance, semi-tandem stance (preferred foot forward with the instep of one foot touching the big toe of the other foot), tandem stance (one foot in front of the other, heel touching toe) and one legged stance (preferred leg for support).
The person is instructed to stand quietly on the pressure platform, arms along the body, neither with shoes or assistive devices. The positions must be held by 10 seconds each, without moving the feet, needing support, losing balance or touching the leg of support with the other leg, and must be performed with eyes open and then closed (excluding one legged stance position). The sequence will be side by side stance eyes open, side by side stance eyes closed, semi-tandem stance eyes open, semi-tandem stance eyes closed, tandem stance eyes open, tandem stance eyes closed and one leg stand eyes open. If the person failed to accomplish one of the test positions, the test finishes. The final score will be the number of positions successfully completed. The inability to complete 10 seconds in the tandem stance position, with eyes open, has been associated with higher risk of falling and mobility dysfunction.
10 meters Walking Speed Walking speed is the result of a complex interaction of multiple body structures and functions, such as lower extremity strength, proactive and reactive postural control, motor control or musculoskeletal condition. Accessing the gait speed (GS) as a screening tool can be useful to identify those at risk or in need of intervention, since the gait speed results are related to various health outcomes, like functional decline or fear of falling, besides GS can be a predictor of falls.
The performance of this test requires a 20 meters straight path, with 5 meters for acceleration, 10 meters for steady-state walking and 5 meters for deceleration. Markers are placed at the 0, 5, 15 and 20 meters positions of the path and the time to walk along the 5 and 15 meters is registered. The person is instructed to walk at his/her faster walking speed, without running, along the 20 meters path; an assistive device can be used if needed and the person should wear his/her regular footwear.
The range of normal walking speed is between 1,2 and 1,4 m/s, since it varies by age, gender and anthropometrics A value lower than 0,4m/s indicates a probability of needing an assistive device at home; 0,4 to 0,8 m/s is correlated with limited mobility; 0,8 to 1,25 m/s ambulation in the community with some risks; ≤ 1m/s subjects should start a program to reduce the risk of falling; ≥ 1,42 m/s is the safe streets crossing speed.
Questionnaires Self-efficacy for exercise The self-efficacy reflects the confidence that a person has to perform a certain behavior.
The self-efficacy for exercise is a 5-items scale intended to analyse the confidence that a person has to perform exercise according to five different emotional states, like feeling worried/having problems, feeling depressed, feeling tired, feeling tense and being busy.
Ratings are done using a 5-points Likert scale from 1 "not at all true" to 4 "completely true"; in between, 2 "slightly true" and 3 "moderately true".
Activities and Participation Profile related to Mobility (PAPM) The PAPM is an 18-items scale intended to improve understanding of the difficulties an individual experiences in performing certain daily activities in their natural environment. These activities can be conditioned by mobility and are related to the interactions and social relations, education, employment, money management, social and community life, influencing the active participation of any person as a full member of the society.
Ratings are done using a 5-points Likert scale from 0 "no limitation/restriction" to 4 "complete limitation/restriction". In between, 1 "mild limitation/restriction", 2 "moderate limitation/restriction" and 3 "severe limitation/restriction". Since some activities may not apply, not all activities may be rated. As a result, an individual's participation profile will be produced.
Home Safety Checklist for Fall Prevention The Home Safety Checklist for Fall Prevention is a 38-items scale intended to identify home hazards in each room of a person's home, namely hall and hallways, stairs, living/dining room, kitchen, bathroom, bedroom and outdoors.
Ratings are done using a 3 points scale from 0 "no risk", 1 "risk" to 99 "do not apply". A risk score is produced both to each room and for the home in general.
Statistical Analysis Statistical analysis will be performed using International Business Machines Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (IBM SPSS) (v.24) software. The sample size was calculated for infinite population for a 95% confidence interval and 5% margin of error, in order to assess the number of participants needed to consider a representative sample of Portuguese population (minimum of participants 385).
To perform the data analysis, the participants will be categorized as "fallers" (with one or more falls) and "non-fallers", according to the occurrence of falls during the 12 months follow-up period.
The statistical approach will be different according to the level of measurement for the variables. The descriptive analysis will determine mean and standard deviation for the quantitative variables and frequencies for the qualitative ones. Differences in the data between "fallers" and "non-fallers" will be analysed by Student t test for independent samples or Chi-square test. Binary logistic regression analysis will be performed to determine a model that allows the prediction of falls from the functional tests and other variables. Receiver-Operating Characteristic curves (ROC curve) analysis will be used to identify the best cut-off score that distinguishes "fallers" from "non-fallers". Sensitivity (percentage of "fallers" who were correctly identified), specificity (percentage of "non-fallers" that were correctly identified) and area under the receiver characteristic curve (AUC) of the model will be calculated for prediction of falls. A significance of 0.05 will be considered for all comparisons, except for the quality of adjustment of the regression models, obtained with the Hosmer and Lemeshow test, whose significance is considered for p≥0.05.
- Conditions
- Accidental Falls
- Keywords
- Primary prevention, Adults, Pressure platform, Inertial Sensors, Clinical Protocol
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Fallers | Participants who reported at least one fall in the 12-months follow-up period were categorized as "fallers". | |
| Non-Fallers | Participants who did not report any fall in the 12-months follow-up period were categorized as "non-fallers". |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
History of Fall
Falls occurrence in the 12 months follow up period. "Did you fall in the past month?"
Measured: Monthly for a 12 months period
Secondary outcomes (29)
History of fall (Previous 12 months)
Falls occurrence 12 months prior to the screening. "Did you fall in the past 12 months?"
Measured: Day 0
Fear of Falling
"Are you afraid of falling?"
Measured: Day 0
Grip Strength
Kilogram-force
Measured: Day 0
Timed Up and Go
seconds
Measured: Day 0
30 seconds Sit-to-Stand
number of stands
Measured: Day 0
Step Test
number of steps
Measured: Day 0
4 Stage Balance Test "Modified"
last position accomplished
Measured: Day 0
10 meters Walking Speed
meters per second
Measured: Day 0
Self-efficacy for exercise
Score 5 to 20 points
Measured: Day 0
Activities and Participation Profile related to Mobility (PAPM)
Classification: 0 "no limitation/restriction", 1 "mild limitation/restriction", 2 "moderate limitation/restriction", 3 "severe limitation/restriction", 4 "complete limitation/restriction"
Measured: Day 0
Home Safety Checklist for Fall Prevention
Risk score from 0% (better) to 100% (worse), produced both to each room and for the home in general
Measured: Day 0
Self-reported question on Urinary incontinence
"Do you leak urine when you laugh, cough, sneeze or lift weights?"
Measured: Day 0
Self-reported question on Osteoarthritis
Have you ever been diagnosed with osteoarthritis?
Measured: Day 0
Self-reported question on Parkinson's disease
Have you ever been diagnosed with Parkinson's disease?
Measured: Day 0
Self-reported question on Osteoporosis
Have you ever been diagnosed with osteoporosis?
Measured: Day 0
Self-reported question on High cholesterol
Have you ever been diagnosed with high cholesterol?
Measured: Day 0
Self-reported question on Stroke
Have you ever suffered from a stroke?
Measured: Day 0
Self-reported question on Heart attack
Have you ever suffered from a heart attack?
Measured: Day 0
Self-reported question on Hypertension
Have you ever been diagnosed with hypertension?
Measured: Day 0
Self-reported question on Diabetes
Have you ever been diagnosed with Diabetes?
Measured: Day 0
Self-reported question on Vision impairment
"Do you have trouble seeing well or it has been past more than 2 years since your eyes have been tested?"
Measured: Day 0
Self-reported question on Hearing problems
Do you have trouble hearing well?
Measured: Day 0
Self-reported question on Medication
"Do you take 4 or more different medicines per day?"
Measured: Day 0
Self-reported question on Sedentary Behavior
"Do you spend over 4 hours seated, 5 days or more per week?"
Measured: Day 0
Self-reported question on Upper Extremities Assistance to Stand from a Chair
"Do you need assistance from the upper extremities to stand up from a chair?
Measured: Day 0
Self-reported question on Living settings
"Do you live alone?"
Measured: Day 0
Self-reported question on Alcohol habits
"Do you drink alcohol every day?"
Measured: Day 0
Self-reported question on Self-Perceived Health
"In general, do you perceived your health as excellent, very good, good, sufficient or poor?"
Measured: Day 0
Self-reported question on Unintentional or involuntary weight loss
The participants will be asked if they had experienced a weight loss higher than ≥4,5kg or ≥5% of body weight during the previous 12 months.
Measured: Day 0
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Aug 2018
- Study start22 Jun 2016
- Primary completion16 Jan 2018
- Study completion16 Jan 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Accidental FallsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 506 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Anabela Correia Martins
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Sensing Future Technologies, Fraunhofer Portugal Research Center for Assistive Information and Communication Solutions
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Anabela Correia Martins, Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde de Coimbra
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03619200
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 6/2017
- Other IDs
- POCI-01-0247-FEDER-003464
- Status last verified
- Aug 2018
- First submitted
- 19 May 2018
- Last updated
- 7 Aug 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Aug 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- FallSensing, a Multifactorial Screening Tool for Fall-risk in Community-dwelling Adults Aged 50 Years or Over
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03619200
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 6/2017
- Conditions
- Accidental Falls
- Keywords
- Primary prevention, Adults, Pressure platform, Inertial Sensors, Clinical Protocol
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 506 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Anabela Correia MartinsUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Sensing Future Technologies, Fraunhofer Portugal Research Center for Assistive Information and Communication Solutions
- Study start
- 22 Jun 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 16 Jan 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
FallSensing screening tool is a technological solution for fall risk screening, including a software, a pressure platform and two inertial sensors. The screening includes questions about demographic and anthropometric data, health and lifestyle behaviors, a detailed explanation about procedures to accomplish six functional tests (Grip Strength, Timed Up and Go, 30 seconds Sit-to-Stand, Step test, 4 Stage Balance test "modified" and 10 meters Walking Speed) and three questionnaires concerning environmental home hazards, activities and participation profile related to mobility and self-efficacy for exercise.
Detailed description
Variable: History of Fall (HoF) A fall can be defined as "an unexpected event in which the participant comes to rest on the ground, floor, or lower level" and "excludes coming to rest against furniture, wall, or other structure" .
The HoF within the previous 12 months will be determined by self-report, answering the question "Did you fall in the past 12 months? Yes-No". If the participant has fallen, it will be asked if the fall was outdoor or indoor, the reason of the fall (slip, stumble, loss of consciousness, dizziness, lower extremities weakness, no special reason and other), need of health services assistance, which health service (hospital, primary health care centre), hospitalization (how many days), activities limitation and restrictions on participation (how many days) and fractures occurrence (wrist or hand, hip, skull or spine, others).
Variable: History of falls after 12 months Participants will be prospectively followed for a 12-month period, via monthly phone calls, in order to record the falls occurrence. The rate of falls will be recorded from the day of inclusion until voluntary dropout, loss of phone contact or the end of the follow-up period (365 days later).
Variable: Fear of Falling (FoF) FoF is defined as "a lasting concern about falling that leads to an individual avoiding activities that he/she remains capable of performing".
Considering the negative influence of FoF, its existence will be assessed by self-report through the question "Are you afraid of falling? Yes - No".
Variable: Health Conditions There are certain conditions that can have a significant effect on fall rates among older adults, such as bladder incontinence, osteoarthritis, Parkinson's disease, cardiovascular accidents and conditions associated with cardiovascular disease, like hypertension.
The question "Do you have trouble seeing well or it has been past more than 2 years since your eyes have been tested?", once changes in visual acuity, development of cataracts, macular degeneration, glaucoma, and other conditions related to the aging process contribute to risk of falling.
Variable: Medication Older adults taking more than three or four medicines were found to be at increased risk of recurrent falls.
The number of medicines taken by each person was assessed by self-report through the question "Do you take 4 or more different medicines per day? Yes-No". The name of the medicines was also registered and they were identified according to their pharmaceutical group (benzodiazepines, antidepressants, antipsychotics, anti-inflammatory drugs, antihypertensive drugs and others drugs).
Variable: Sedentary Behavior In order to understand the community-dwelling adults' sedentary behavior by using a self-reported question, it was adopted the estimate measure of sedentariness calculated by Heseltine et al. (2015): "Do you spend over 4 hours seated, 5 days or more per week?".
Variable: Upper Extremities Assistance to Stand from a Chair The upper extremities assistance to stand from a chair was assessed through the question "Do you need assistance from the upper extremities to stand up from a chair? Yes-No", once it is assumed that is a sign of weak lower extremities muscles, a major reason for falling.
Variable: Living settings Since FoF is more frequent among older adults living alone, this protocol intends to assess the living settings through the question "Do you live alone? Yes-No".
Variable: Alcohol habits Regular alcohol consumption among older adults has been linked to impaired balance and postural hypotension, which has been associated with frequent falls.
The participants will be asked about their daily alcohol habits, "Do you drink alcohol every day? Yes-No".
Variable: Self-Perceived Health The self-perceived health (SPH) is considered a valid and reliable indicator of overall health status, a predictor of mortality and health services use.
SPH will be assessed by self-report through the question "In general, do you perceived your health as excellent, very good, good, sufficient or poor?"
Variable: Unintentional or involuntary weight loss The involuntary weight loss is one of the features that, simultaneously with others, can help to define a frailty phenotype.
The literature reveals an association between the frailty phenotype and the number of previous falls in older people. The participants will be asked if they had experienced a weight loss higher than ≥4,5kg or ≥5% of body weight during the previous 12 months.
Variable: Grip Strength The hand grip strength is significantly correlated with lower limb muscular strength, being a powerful predictor of disability, morbidity and mortality.
This test will be performed with the person seated on a standard chair without armrests, shoulder adducted and neutrally rotated, elbow flexed at 90 degrees, forearm neutral, wrist held between 0-15 degrees of ulnar deviation and with the arm not supported. A Jamar™ Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer will be settled at the second handle position, held with the dominant hand, and during the performance of the test will be presented vertically in line with the forearm. The test is performed only one time and the person is encouraged to exert her/his maximal grip strength for 5 seconds. The final score is measured in kilograms force (kgf). Normative data for this test are commonly analysed by gender, with males showing higher grip strength at all ages. A score below 15 kgf, for women, and 21 kgf, for men, identify those with higher risk of falling.
Variable:Timed Up and Go Timed Up and Go test (TUG) is used to assess dynamic balance during gait and transfers tasks, mobility and lower body strength. To perform this test, the person, wearing his/her regular footwear, is instructed to sit on a standard chair (chair height between 44 and 47 cm) with his/her back against the chair back, to stand up and walk straight for 3 meters as fast as possible, turn around, walk back and sit down. The person must stand up without help (cannot use the upper extremities for support), however if a walking aid is needed it should be placed next to the chair and can be used to perform the gait component of the test. The test is performed only one time, the timing begins at the instruction "go" and stops when the patient seats on the chair. A score higher than 10 seconds will indicate which community-dwelling older adults are more likely to be fallers.
Variable: 30 seconds Sit-to-Stand Lower body strength is a significant element to maintaining functional capacity in older adults, therefore its evaluation is critical. 30 seconds Sit-to-Stand (STS), being a simple and effective instrument for assessing lower body strength and identifying muscle weakness in community-dwelling older adults, is one of the most important functional evaluation clinical tests. The person is instructed to perform cycles of sits and stands up from a chair, as many times as possible over 30 seconds.
The person starts the test seated in the middle of the chair (chair height between 40 and 43,3cm), feet approximately shoulder-width apart and placed on the floor, and arms crossed by the wrists placed against the chest. The vocal instruction "go" sets the test´s beginning and if the participant completes more than halfway up at the end of 30 seconds it is counted as a full stand. Final score involves recording the number of stands a person can complete in 30 seconds. The normative levels for number of stands depends on age and gender.
Variable: Step Test The step test, was designed to assess the dynamic standing balance and reproduces lower-extremity motor control and coordination.
In order to perform the test, the person is asked to step on and off a block (7,5 cm height, 55 cm width, 35cm depth), placed against a wall, as many times as possible during 15 seconds. The whole foot is required to step onto the block and then return it fully to the ground. The total number of completed steps in 15 seconds is recorded. The patient is unsupported and should look straight forward, although investigator must stand close by for safety. In the case of patient overbalanced or need stabilization during the test, counting of steps stops and it is recorded the complete number of steps prior to overbalancing. This test is performed only for the dominant side, indicated by the person. A performance lower than 10 steps indicates higher risk of falling.
4 Stage Balance Test "Modified" Deficits in balance can lead to falls and fall related injuries, representing one of the most important intrinsic fall risk factors among older adults, being commonly assessed in this population.
The 4 Stage Balance Test "modified" is one of the tests available to evaluate balance. In order to complete this test, the person needs to progressively accomplish four different feet positions: side by side stance, semi-tandem stance (preferred foot forward with the instep of one foot touching the big toe of the other foot), tandem stance (one foot in front of the other, heel touching toe) and one legged stance (preferred leg for support).
The person is instructed to stand quietly on the pressure platform, arms along the body, neither with shoes or assistive devices. The positions must be held by 10 seconds each, without moving the feet, needing support, losing balance or touching the leg of support with the other leg, and must be performed with eyes open and then closed (excluding one legged stance position). The sequence will be side by side stance eyes open, side by side stance eyes closed, semi-tandem stance eyes open, semi-tandem stance eyes closed, tandem stance eyes open, tandem stance eyes closed and one leg stand eyes open. If the person failed to accomplish one of the test positions, the test finishes. The final score will be the number of positions successfully completed. The inability to complete 10 seconds in the tandem stance position, with eyes open, has been associated with higher risk of falling and mobility dysfunction.
10 meters Walking Speed Walking speed is the result of a complex interaction of multiple body structures and functions, such as lower extremity strength, proactive and reactive postural control, motor control or musculoskeletal condition. Accessing the gait speed (GS) as a screening tool can be useful to identify those at risk or in need of intervention, since the gait speed results are related to various health outcomes, like functional decline or fear of falling, besides GS can be a predictor of falls.
The performance of this test requires a 20 meters straight path, with 5 meters for acceleration, 10 meters for steady-state walking and 5 meters for deceleration. Markers are placed at the 0, 5, 15 and 20 meters positions of the path and the time to walk along the 5 and 15 meters is registered. The person is instructed to walk at his/her faster walking speed, without running, along the 20 meters path; an assistive device can be used if needed and the person should wear his/her regular footwear.
The range of normal walking speed is between 1,2 and 1,4 m/s, since it varies by age, gender and anthropometrics A value lower than 0,4m/s indicates a probability of needing an assistive device at home; 0,4 to 0,8 m/s is correlated with limited mobility; 0,8 to 1,25 m/s ambulation in the community with some risks; ≤ 1m/s subjects should start a program to reduce the risk of falling; ≥ 1,42 m/s is the safe streets crossing speed.
Questionnaires Self-efficacy for exercise The self-efficacy reflects the confidence that a person has to perform a certain behavior.
The self-efficacy for exercise is a 5-items scale intended to analyse the confidence that a person has to perform exercise according to five different emotional states, like feeling worried/having problems, feeling depressed, feeling tired, feeling tense and being busy.
Ratings are done using a 5-points Likert scale from 1 "not at all true" to 4 "completely true"; in between, 2 "slightly true" and 3 "moderately true".
Activities and Participation Profile related to Mobility (PAPM) The PAPM is an 18-items scale intended to improve understanding of the difficulties an individual experiences in performing certain daily activities in their natural environment. These activities can be conditioned by mobility and are related to the interactions and social relations, education, employment, money management, social and community life, influencing the active participation of any person as a full member of the society.
Ratings are done using a 5-points Likert scale from 0 "no limitation/restriction" to 4 "complete limitation/restriction". In between, 1 "mild limitation/restriction", 2 "moderate limitation/restriction" and 3 "severe limitation/restriction". Since some activities may not apply, not all activities may be rated. As a result, an individual's participation profile will be produced.
Home Safety Checklist for Fall Prevention The Home Safety Checklist for Fall Prevention is a 38-items scale intended to identify home hazards in each room of a person's home, namely hall and hallways, stairs, living/dining room, kitchen, bathroom, bedroom and outdoors.
Ratings are done using a 3 points scale from 0 "no risk", 1 "risk" to 99 "do not apply". A risk score is produced both to each room and for the home in general.
Statistical Analysis Statistical analysis will be performed using International Business Machines Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (IBM SPSS) (v.24) software. The sample size was calculated for infinite population for a 95% confidence interval and 5% margin of error, in order to assess the number of participants needed to consider a representative sample of Portuguese population (minimum of participants 385).
To perform the data analysis, the participants will be categorized as "fallers" (with one or more falls) and "non-fallers", according to the occurrence of falls during the 12 months follow-up period.
The statistical approach will be different according to the level of measurement for the variables. The descriptive analysis will determine mean and standard deviation for the quantitative variables and frequencies for the qualitative ones. Differences in the data between "fallers" and "non-fallers" will be analysed by Student t test for independent samples or Chi-square test. Binary logistic regression analysis will be performed to determine a model that allows the prediction of falls from the functional tests and other variables. Receiver-Operating Characteristic curves (ROC curve) analysis will be used to identify the best cut-off score that distinguishes "fallers" from "non-fallers". Sensitivity (percentage of "fallers" who were correctly identified), specificity (percentage of "non-fallers" that were correctly identified) and area under the receiver characteristic curve (AUC) of the model will be calculated for prediction of falls. A significance of 0.05 will be considered for all comparisons, except for the quality of adjustment of the regression models, obtained with the Hosmer and Lemeshow test, whose significance is considered for p≥0.05.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Fallers | – | –Participants who reported at least one fall in the 12-months follow-up period were categorized as "fallers". |
| Non-Fallers | – | –Participants who did not report any fall in the 12-months follow-up period were categorized as "non-fallers". |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Individuals are voluntarily recruited from several settings from the community, in different regions of continental Portugal, such as parish councils, physical therapy clinics, senior's universities and other facilities.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- adults aged 50 years or over,
- Community-dweller
- independent to be standing and walking, with or without walking aids
- interest to participate in the study.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- severe sensorial impairments (deafness or blindness)
- cognitive impairments which precludes the ability to comprehend the questionnaires and functional tests included in the screening protocol
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
History of Fall
Time frame: Monthly for a 12 months period
Falls occurrence in the 12 months follow up period. "Did you fall in the past month?"
29 secondary outcomes
History of fall (Previous 12 months)
Time frame: Day 0
Fear of Falling
Time frame: Day 0
Grip Strength
Time frame: Day 0
Timed Up and Go
Time frame: Day 0
30 seconds Sit-to-Stand
Time frame: Day 0
Step Test
Time frame: Day 0
4 Stage Balance Test "Modified"
Time frame: Day 0
10 meters Walking Speed
Time frame: Day 0
Self-efficacy for exercise
Time frame: Day 0
Activities and Participation Profile related to Mobility (PAPM)
Time frame: Day 0
Home Safety Checklist for Fall Prevention
Time frame: Day 0
Self-reported question on Urinary incontinence
Time frame: Day 0
Self-reported question on Osteoarthritis
Time frame: Day 0
Self-reported question on Parkinson's disease
Time frame: Day 0
Self-reported question on Osteoporosis
Time frame: Day 0
Self-reported question on High cholesterol
Time frame: Day 0
Self-reported question on Stroke
Time frame: Day 0
Self-reported question on Heart attack
Time frame: Day 0
Self-reported question on Hypertension
Time frame: Day 0
Self-reported question on Diabetes
Time frame: Day 0
Self-reported question on Vision impairment
Time frame: Day 0
Self-reported question on Hearing problems
Time frame: Day 0
Self-reported question on Medication
Time frame: Day 0
Self-reported question on Sedentary Behavior
Time frame: Day 0
Self-reported question on Upper Extremities Assistance to Stand from a Chair
Time frame: Day 0
Self-reported question on Living settings
Time frame: Day 0
Self-reported question on Alcohol habits
Time frame: Day 0
Self-reported question on Self-Perceived Health
Time frame: Day 0
Self-reported question on Unintentional or involuntary weight loss
Time frame: Day 0
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Aug 2018.
Related trials for Accidental Falls
Not yet recruiting
Combined Versus Multicomponent Training in People With Chronic Kidney Disease Stages 3a and 3b
Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3A, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3B
Not yet recruiting
Exercise and Fall Prevention for Fracture Reduction
Osteopenia, Osteoporosis
RecruitingObservational study
Physical Function and Fall Risk in Older Adults in the Lalín Frailty Prevention Program
Frailty, Fall Risk, Fall Prevention
Active, not recruiting
Impact of Screening and Multicomponent Exercise on Fall Rates, Fractures, and Cardiovascular Health in Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes, Osteoporosis
Not yet recruiting
Multicomponent Exercise and Pain Science Education for Fall Prevention in Older Adults With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain (MovePainFall)
Chronic Pain, Musculoskeletal Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Accidental Falls, run by Anabela Correia Martins.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Aug 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
History of Fall (time frame: Monthly for a 12 months period). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Aug 2018.