AzTrials
AzTrials

Rectus Abdominus; Diastasis, Complicating DeliveryNCT03623594

Abdominal Trunk Function After Surgical Repair of Abdominal Rectus Muscle Diastasis

A study testing Surgical repair of the diastasis in people with Rectus Abdominus; Diastasis, Complicating Delivery, run by Karolinska Institutet.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

There is insufficient evidence regarding the benefit from surgical reconstruction of post-partum abdominal rectus muscle diastasis. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the abdominal trunk function preoperatively and postoperatively in a group of women undergoing surgery for abdominal rectus muscle diastasis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 55 years, women only
What is being tested?
Surgical repair of the diastasis
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Jan 2015to 31 Mar 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 55 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Non-smoking women
  • BMI <35
  • Inter-recti distance >3cm
  • Lack of response to standardized core stabilizing training
  • >1 year since last partus
  • No intention of further pregnancies

Who cannot join

  • Inability to quit smoking
  • BMI >35
  • Inter-recti distance <3cm
  • <1 year since last partus
  • Further pregnancies not excluded

About this study

Official title: Abdominal Trunk Function After Surgical Repair of Abdominal Rectus Muscle Diastasis: Outcome Measured With the Abdominal Trunk Function Protocol

There is insufficient evidence regarding the benefit from surgical reconstruction of post-partum abdominal rectus muscle diastasis. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the abdominal trunk function preoperatively and postoperatively in a group of women undergoing surgery for abdominal rectus muscle diastasis.

Read the detailed description

There is little evidence regarding the various treatment options of abdominal rectus muscle diastasis in post-partum women. The lack of evidence may, to a great extent, be explained by the lack of uniform criteria for assessing the trunk function and how the trunk function affects the ability to perform daily activities. To be able to evaluate the condition with symptomatic ARD a more comprehensive, multimodal instrument is therefore needed.

In collaboration with the surgical clinic and the physiotherapy clinic at Södersjukhuset a multimodal examination test was developed with the purpose to be able to evaluate the full picture of the condition.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of surgical reconstruction of post-partum abdominal rectus muscle diastasis in women with insufficient improvement after adequate physical training using a novel multimodal evaluation tool.

Being tested
Surgical repair of the diastasis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Surgical repair of the diastasisProcedure or surgery

    Repair of the diastasis with a double row plication using absorbable Quill suture

Study groups in NCT03623594
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Surgical repair of the diastasisExperimentalRepair of the diastasis with a double row plication using absorbable Quill suture
Receives: Procedure: Surgical repair of the diastasis

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Abdominal Trunk Function assessed with Disability Rating Index (DRI)

    DRI is a self -report form that covers twelve activities related to daily activities. Each activity is rated on a visual analogue scale from 0 to 100. The total score thus ranges from 0 to 1200, with higher scores corresponding to better function.

    Measured: One year

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Health-related quality of life: SF-36

    SF-36 is a set of generic and coherent quality-of-life measures. The form includes 36 items covering various aspects of quality of life. It gives eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The higher the score the less disability.

    Measured: One year

  2. Urogenital distress rated with Urinary Distress Inventory Short Form (UDI-6)

    The UDI-6 is a six item symptom inventory, specific to symptoms associated with lower urinary tract dysfunction, and combines information on irritative, stress and obstructive symptoms. It was developed for self-administration and is intended to be used in combination with IIQ-7. Patients rate how much they experience impaired function of urinary incontinence and the extent to which urinary incontinence affects daily functioning with four response options per item. The mean score of items is multiplied by 33 1/3 to convert to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores indicate more symptom distress.

    Measured: One year

  3. Urinary stress incontinence rated with IIQ-7.

    The IIQ-7 is a seven item life-impact assessment instrument specific to UI, and covers separate domains of physical activity, travel, social, and emotional health. It was developed for self-administration and is intended to be used in combination with UDI-6. Patients rate how much they experience impaired function of urinary incontinence and the extent to which urinary incontinence affects daily functioning with four response options per item. The mean score of items is multiplied by 33 1/3 to convert to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores indicate more impact on daily life.

    Measured: One year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Aug 2018
  2. Study start1 Jan 2015
  3. Primary completion31 Mar 2017
  4. Study completion31 Mar 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
Repair of the abdominal rectus diastasis with a double row plication using absorbable Quill
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03623594
Sponsor's protocol ID
ARD
Status last verified
Mar 2022
First submitted
6 Aug 2018
Last updated
31 Mar 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Surgical repair of the diastasis in people with Rectus Abdominus; Diastasis, Complicating Delivery, run by Karolinska Institutet.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Abdominal Trunk Function assessed with Disability Rating Index (DRI) (time frame: One year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Mar 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in