Kinesio TapingNCT03624075
Effect of Kinesio Taping in Women With Knee Osteoarthritis
A study testing application of kinesio taping in people with Kinesio Taping and Knee Osteoarthritis, run by Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is a disease characterized mainly by the wear and tear of the articular structures, which affects 6% to 13% of men and 7% to 19% of women, and their prevalence may be increased proportionally with increasing age. Signs and symptoms include pain, joint stiffness and loss of function. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 to 75 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Kinesio Taping, Knee Osteoarthritis
- What is being tested?
- application of kinesio taping
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 45 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- 11 Jun 2018to 11 Jun 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 to 75 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- • Female subjects aged 60 years and over, non-obese (BMI between 18.5 and 24.9 kg / m2), with diagnosis of knee OA according to the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (Altman et al. , 1986), which are: knee pain most of the day during the last weeks and age greater than 60 years (mandatory criteria), and at least two of the following criteria: stiffness after rest less than 30 minutes, crackle in the affected knee , joint increase of firm consistency, absence of temperature increase and painful hypersensitivity to palpation;
- Individuals with radiographic signs of degeneration of the knee joint;
- Individuals with any degree of degeneration according to the Kellgren-Lawrence scale;
- Individuals with a pain scale above 3 according to NPRS;
- Stiffness in the knee for at least 6 months prior to screening;
- Stiffness during the beginning of activities;
Show all 11Show fewer
- Intermittent swelling;
- Never have used KT;
- Individuals with no history of associated joint disease or systemic rheumatic disease and / or history of surgery in the affected lower limb;
- Individuals who are not under physiotherapeutic treatment during the intervention;
- Individuals without neurological, vestibular, visual or auditory deficits that make evaluations impossible.
Who cannot join
- • Individuals who report pain during the procedure;
- Individuals who do not complete the treatment time or who do not perform the evaluation procedures correctly, making it impossible to collect any of the data investigated;
- Individuals with allergy to bandage or cutaneous injury in the region where KT will be applied;
- Individuals who present hypertensive peak during the evaluations.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effect of Kinesio Taping on Muscle Force, Pain, Edema, Physical Function and Global Perception of Change of Women With Knee Osteoarthritis: Randomized and Blind Clinical Trial
Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is a disease characterized mainly by the wear and tear of the articular structures, which affects 6% to 13% of men and 7% to 19% of women, and their prevalence may be increased proportionally with increasing age. Signs and symptoms include pain, joint stiffness and loss of function. In this perspective, kinesio taping (KT) appears as an alternative therapeutic resource for the treatment of this type of patient. However, the current evidence on this technique is limited and conflicting, making its effects on the symptomatology of the disease still uncertain. Thus, the present study will evaluate the effects of KT application on muscle strength, pain, physical function, edema and quality of life of elderly women with knee OA. It will be a randomized, blind clinical trial in which 45 volunteers will be allocated to three groups: G1 (placebo group), G2 (control group) and G3 (intervention group). The G1 will be submitted to the placebo (no tension) application of KT on rectos femoris muscle and knee; the G2 will receive a protocol of a health education activity session lasting 60 minutes and finally the G3 will be submitted to the simultaneous application (with tension) of two KT techniques on rectos femoris muscle and knee. All groups will be evaluated before, immediately after and 72 hours after the application. To measure the variables, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), 6-minute walk test (6MWT), isometric dynamometer, perimetry and global rating of change. Statistical analysis will be done using SPSS® software (Statistical Package Social Science) version 20.0. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Levene tests will be applied to evaluate the normality and homogeneity of the data, respectively. Intra and intergroup comparisons will be evaluated using analysis of variance ANOVA of mixed model. In the presence of a significant F, the Benferroni pot-hoc test will be used to identify where the difference occurred. For all statistical analyzes, a significance level of 5% (p <0.05) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) will be adopted.
- Conditions
- Kinesio Taping, Knee Osteoarthritis
- Being tested
- application of kinesio taping
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis, Knee
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
application of kinesio tapingOther
application of kinesio taping in the rectus femoris muscle and in the medial and lateral region of the knee
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| control group | No intervention | The control group had a protocol of a health education / self-gestation session lasting 60 minutes. This session should include topics such as definition of knee OA, guidance on knee anatomy and physiology, prayer over articulation, rehabilitation and practice of exercises, and as volunteer to receive an educational and self explanatory primer with all the content that is exposed during a lesson . |
| Placebo group | Placebo comparator | The placebo group will simultaneously receive two techniques of applying tensionless KT. The first technique that will be applied is inverted 'Y' on the rectus femoris. In the second technique to be applied, the tape body will be divided lengthwise into four narrow strips. The two pieces intersect the front of the knee. For this application, the volunteer will be positioned in the dorsal position without knee flexion and the tape will be applied by a trained researcher. In the case of bilateral OA, in both techniques of application, the most affected member based on the NPRS score will be the one that will undergo the intervention. All volunteers will remain with the tape for 72 hours. Receives: Other: application of kinesio taping |
| intervention group | Experimental | The intervention group will receive the same protocol as the placebo group, differing only in relation to the tension of the bandage. According to Kase et al (2003), the techniques recommend the relief of pain and edema and performance. In the second technique to be applied, the tape body will be divided lengthwise into four narrow strips. The two pieces intersect the front of the knee. For this application, the volunteer will be positioned in the dorsal position without knee flexion and the tape will be applied by a trained researcher. In the case of bilateral OA, in both techniques of application, the most affected member based on the NPRS score will be the one that will undergo the intervention. All volunteers will remain with the tape for 72 hours. Receives: Other: application of kinesio taping |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
The primary outcome will pain assessed by the NPRS, whereby participants were asked to choose a number between 0 (no pain) and 10 (worst pain possible). They will instructed to report the level of pain while sitting and rising from a chair.
Measured: Time 0 - baseline
Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
The pain of the volunteers will be indirectly measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), which varies from 0 to 10 (unbearable pain) (SCOTT and HUSKISSON, 1976) . The pain will be measured during the activity of climbing stairs. The patient will be directed to go up and down a staircase with two steps. Initially a volunteer will become familiarized. Volunteers will be guided to perform a normal collective activity (the way they are done in the day). In order to, a voluntary test measure will be used while using an VAS. In VAS, the lower the value, the less the pain sensation realatable by the patient and the higher the value, the greater the pain sensation.
Measured: Time 1 - after 10min of the baseline
Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
The primary outcome will pain assessed by the NPRS, whereby participants were asked to choose a number between 0 (no pain) and 10 (worst pain possible). They will instructed to report the level of pain while sitting and rising from a chair.
Measured: Time 2 - after 72 hours of baseline
Secondary outcomes (9)
Perimetry
To perform perimetry, a tape measure will be used to measure the perimeter of the assessed limb. For this, the volunteer will be placed in dorsal decubitus with hip in neutral position, extended knees and relaxed quadriceps. In this position, the evaluator will measure the knee at three specific points: the fold of the popliteal fossa, 5 cm above and 5 cm below. Each level will be evaluated three times and the average of the measurements will be used for analysis.
Measured: Time 0 - baseline
Perimetry
To perform perimetry, a tape measure will be used to measure the perimeter of the assessed limb. For this, the volunteer will be placed in dorsal decubitus with hip in neutral position, extended knees and relaxed quadriceps. In this position, the evaluator will measure the knee at three specific points: the fold of the popliteal fossa, 5 cm above and 5 cm below. Each level will be evaluated three times and the average of the measurements will be used for analysis.
Measured: Time 2 - after 72 hours of baseline
Quadriceps muscle strength
The isometric strength of the femoral quadriceps will evaluated using a hand-held dynamometer (HHD; Nicholas Manual Muscle Tester, Lafayette Instrument Company, Lafayette, Indiana, USA). The participant will placed in the sitting position on a stretcher, with arms crossed over chest. An ankle stabilization belt will placed on the evaluated limb to maintain hip and knee flexion at 90°. The HHD will placed 2 cm proximal to the lateral malleolus midpoint, in the anterior region of the ankle (between the malleoli). Maximum isometric strength will then measured in 5-second knee extensions, with continuous verbal encouragement. Subjects perform one practice trial, rested for 30 s and then carried out the three measured trials, the strongest of which will use for data analysis. The results of all trials [kg] will transformed into Newtons (Strength[N] = strength [kg] x 9.81) and normalized by body mass (Normalized Strength [N/kg] = Strength [N] ÷ Body Mass[kg]).
Measured: Time 0 - baseline
Quadriceps muscle strength
The isometric strength of the femoral quadriceps will evaluated using a hand-held dynamometer (HHD; Nicholas Manual Muscle Tester, Lafayette Instrument Company, Lafayette, Indiana, USA). The participant will placed in the sitting position on a stretcher, with arms crossed over chest. An ankle stabilization belt will placed on the evaluated limb to maintain hip and knee flexion at 90°. The HHD will placed 2 cm proximal to the lateral malleolus midpoint, in the anterior region of the ankle (between the malleoli). Maximum isometric strength will then measured in 5-second knee extensions, with continuous verbal encouragement. Subjects perform one practice trial, rested for 30 s and then carried out the three measured trials, the strongest of which will use for data analysis. The results of all trials [kg] will transformed into Newtons (Strength[N] = strength [kg] x 9.81) and normalized by body mass (Normalized Strength [N/kg] = Strength [N] ÷ Body Mass[kg]).
Measured: Time 2 - after 72 hours of baseline
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) is a reliable and validated instrument for the Portuguese language that contains 24 questions divided into three categories: pain (5 questions), rigidity (2 questions) and self-reported physical function (17 questions). The items are evaluated by a Likert scale and each question receives a score ranging from 0 to 96, according to the patient's response. The higher the score obtained, the worse is the severity of the disease (BELLAMY et al., 1988).
Measured: Time 0 - baseline
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) is a reliable and validated instrument for the Portuguese language that contains 24 questions divided into three categories: pain (5 questions), rigidity (2 questions) and self-reported physical function (17 questions). The items are evaluated by a Likert scale and each question receives a score ranging from 0 to 96, according to the patient's response. The higher the score obtained, the worse is the severity of the disease (BELLAMY et al., 1988).
Measured: Time 2 - after 72 hours of baseline
6-minute walk (6MWT)
The six-minute walk test (6MWT) will follow the recommendations of the American Thoracic Society (2002). A distance of 30 meters will be demarcated by two cones (one in the initial mark and the other in the final mark). The volunteers will be instructed to walk the greatest number of times the distance marked for six minutes and, at the end of this time, the distance traveled will be measured, in this case, the greater the distance covered, the better the patient's function.
Measured: Time 0 - baseline
6-minute walk (6MWT)
The six-minute walk test (6MWT) will follow the recommendations of the American Thoracic Society (2002). A distance of 30 meters will be demarcated by two cones (one in the initial mark and the other in the final mark). The volunteers will be instructed to walk the greatest number of times the distance marked for six minutes and, at the end of this time, the distance traveled will be measured, in this case, the greater the distance covered, the better the patient's function.
Measured: Time 2 - after 72 hours of baseline
Global rating of change
This will assessed via the patient global impression of change. The measure is recommended by the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials group and targets four different domains: pain, function, quality of life, and global condition, measured using a 7-point scale (from 'considerably improved' to 'considerably deteriorated').
Measured: Time 2 - after 72 hours of baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Aug 2018
- Study start11 Jun 2018
- Primary completion11 Mar 2019
- Study completion11 Jun 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Kinesio TapingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The volunteers will be recruited from the waiting list of the Clinic School of Physiotherapy of the Faculty of Health Sciences of Rio Grande do Norte, as well as the community in general. Initially, a signature will be requested from the TCLE and the next series of personal data. When we are already included, how should participants assess pain, muscular strength, edema and physical function (T0). Then all of them must be allocated to one of the three groups, where due intervention is required for each group. After one session, muscle strength and pain were again assessed (T1) and 72 hours later (T2), all outcomes assessed at time T0 were retested, including the global rating of change.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 45 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Caio Alano de Almeida Lins, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03624075
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2.577.088
- Status last verified
- Jun 2020
- First submitted
- 11 Jun 2018
- Last updated
- 29 Jun 2020
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Pinheiro YT, Barbosa GM, Fialho HRF, Silva CAM, Anunciacao JO, Silva HJA, Souza MC, Lins CAA. Does tension applied in kinesio taping affect pain or function in older women with knee osteoarthritis? A randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 16;10(12):e041121. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041121.
PubMed 33328259
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Jun 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Kinesio Taping on Muscle Force, Pain, Edema, Physical Function and Global Perception of Change of Women With Knee Osteoarthritis: Randomized and Blind Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03624075
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2.577.088
- Conditions
- Kinesio Taping, Knee Osteoarthritis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 45 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do NorteUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 11 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 11 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 11 Jun 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is a disease characterized mainly by the wear and tear of the articular structures, which affects 6% to 13% of men and 7% to 19% of women, and their prevalence may be increased proportionally with increasing age. Signs and symptoms include pain, joint stiffness and loss of function. In this perspective, kinesio taping (KT) appears as an alternative therapeutic resource for the treatment of this type of patient. However, the current evidence on this technique is limited and conflicting, making its effects on the symptomatology of the disease still uncertain. Thus, the present study will evaluate the effects of KT application on muscle strength, pain, physical function, edema and quality of life of elderly women with knee OA. It will be a randomized, blind clinical trial in which 45 volunteers will be allocated to three groups: G1 (placebo group), G2 (control group) and G3 (intervention group). The G1 will be submitted to the placebo (no tension) application of KT on rectos femoris muscle and knee; the G2 will receive a protocol of a health education activity session lasting 60 minutes and finally the G3 will be submitted to the simultaneous application (with tension) of two KT techniques on rectos femoris muscle and knee. All groups will be evaluated before, immediately after and 72 hours after the application. To measure the variables, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), 6-minute walk test (6MWT), isometric dynamometer, perimetry and global rating of change. Statistical analysis will be done using SPSS® software (Statistical Package Social Science) version 20.0. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Levene tests will be applied to evaluate the normality and homogeneity of the data, respectively. Intra and intergroup comparisons will be evaluated using analysis of variance ANOVA of mixed model. In the presence of a significant F, the Benferroni pot-hoc test will be used to identify where the difference occurred. For all statistical analyzes, a significance level of 5% (p <0.05) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) will be adopted.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- The volunteers will be recruited from the waiting list of the Clinic School of Physiotherapy of the Faculty of Health Sciences of Rio Grande do Norte, as well as the community in general. Initially, a signature will be requested from the TCLE and the next series of personal data. When we are already included, how should participants assess pain, muscular strength, edema and physical function (T0). Then all of them must be allocated to one of the three groups, where due intervention is required for each group. After one session, muscle strength and pain were again assessed (T1) and 72 hours later (T2), all outcomes assessed at time T0 were retested, including the global rating of change.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| control group | No intervention | –The control group had a protocol of a health education / self-gestation session lasting 60 minutes. This session should include topics such as definition of knee OA, guidance on knee anatomy and physiology, prayer over articulation, rehabilitation and practice of exercises, and as volunteer to receive an educational and self explanatory primer with all the content that is exposed during a lesson . |
| Placebo group | Placebo comparator | Other: application of kinesio tapingThe placebo group will simultaneously receive two techniques of applying tensionless KT. The first technique that will be applied is inverted 'Y' on the rectus femoris. In the second technique to be applied, the tape body will be divided lengthwise into four narrow strips. The two pieces intersect the front of the knee. For this application, the volunteer will be positioned in the dorsal position without knee flexion and the tape will be applied by a trained researcher. In the case of bilateral OA, in both techniques of application, the most affected member based on the NPRS score will be the one that will undergo the intervention. All volunteers will remain with the tape for 72 hours. |
| intervention group | Experimental | Other: application of kinesio tapingThe intervention group will receive the same protocol as the placebo group, differing only in relation to the tension of the bandage. According to Kase et al (2003), the techniques recommend the relief of pain and edema and performance. In the second technique to be applied, the tape body will be divided lengthwise into four narrow strips. The two pieces intersect the front of the knee. For this application, the volunteer will be positioned in the dorsal position without knee flexion and the tape will be applied by a trained researcher. In the case of bilateral OA, in both techniques of application, the most affected member based on the NPRS score will be the one that will undergo the intervention. All volunteers will remain with the tape for 72 hours. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 to 75 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- • Female subjects aged 60 years and over, non-obese (BMI between 18.5 and 24.9 kg / m2), with diagnosis of knee OA according to the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (Altman et al. , 1986), which are: knee pain most of the day during the last weeks and age greater than 60 years (mandatory criteria), and at least two of the following criteria: stiffness after rest less than 30 minutes, crackle in the affected knee , joint increase of firm consistency, absence of temperature increase and painful hypersensitivity to palpation;
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- • Individuals who report pain during the procedure;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| application of kinesio tapingapplication of kinesio taping in the rectus femoris muscle and in the medial and lateral region of the knee | Other | Placebo group, intervention group |
Primary outcome
Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Time frame: Time 0 - baseline
The primary outcome will pain assessed by the NPRS, whereby participants were asked to choose a number between 0 (no pain) and 10 (worst pain possible). They will instructed to report the level of pain while sitting and rising from a chair.
Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Time frame: Time 1 - after 10min of the baseline
The pain of the volunteers will be indirectly measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), which varies from 0 to 10 (unbearable pain) (SCOTT and HUSKISSON, 1976) . The pain will be measured during the activity of climbing stairs. The patient will be directed to go up and down a staircase with two steps. Initially a volunteer will become familiarized. Volunteers will be guided to perform a normal collective activity (the way they are done in the day). In order to, a voluntary test measure will be used while using an VAS. In VAS, the lower the value, the less the pain sensation realatable by the patient and the higher the value, the greater the pain sensation.
Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Time frame: Time 2 - after 72 hours of baseline
The primary outcome will pain assessed by the NPRS, whereby participants were asked to choose a number between 0 (no pain) and 10 (worst pain possible). They will instructed to report the level of pain while sitting and rising from a chair.
9 secondary outcomes
Perimetry
Time frame: Time 0 - baseline
Perimetry
Time frame: Time 2 - after 72 hours of baseline
Quadriceps muscle strength
Time frame: Time 0 - baseline
Quadriceps muscle strength
Time frame: Time 2 - after 72 hours of baseline
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
Time frame: Time 0 - baseline
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
Time frame: Time 2 - after 72 hours of baseline
6-minute walk (6MWT)
Time frame: Time 0 - baseline
6-minute walk (6MWT)
Time frame: Time 2 - after 72 hours of baseline
Global rating of change
Time frame: Time 2 - after 72 hours of baseline
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Jun 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33328259Pinheiro YT, Barbosa GM, Fialho HRF, Silva CAM, Anunciacao JO, Silva HJA, Souza MC, Lins CAA. Does tension applied in kinesio taping affect pain or function in older women with knee osteoarthritis? A randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 16;10(12):e041121. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041121.
Related trials for Kinesio Taping
Enrolling by invitation
Comparison of the Effects of Kinesio Taping and Compression Bandaging on Edema, Range of Motion, Upper Extremity Function, and Grip Strength in Patients With Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema
Lymphedema, Lymphedema Arm
Not yet recruiting
The Effect of Kinesio Taping
Athlete, Adolescent
Recruiting
Effectiveness of Kinesio Taping as an Adjunct to Conservative Treatment in Women With Lipedema
Lipedema
Not yet recruiting
Immediate Effect of Kinesiotaping With Rounded Shoulder Posture in University Students
Rounded Shoulder Posture, Kinesio Taping
Active, not recruiting
Comparison of the Effects of Kinesio Taping and Interval Exercise in Patients Diagnosed With Venous Insufficiency: A Randomised Controlled Trial
Chronic Venous Insufficiency C2 and Below
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing application of kinesio taping in people with Kinesio Taping and Knee Osteoarthritis, run by Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jun 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) (time frame: Time 0 - baseline). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03624075, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jun 2020.