AzTrials
AzTrials

Down SyndromePERSEUSNCT03624556

Pediatric Exploratory Research Study of EGCG Use and Safety (PERSEUS)

A study testing EGCG FontUp in people with Down Syndrome and Fragile X Syndrome, run by Parc de Salut Mar at 1 site in Spain.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To evaluate safety and tolerability of epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) in children from 6 to 12 years old with Intellectual Developmental Disorders (IDD) (Down syndrome or Fragile X syndrome). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 to 12 years
Conditions the study is for
Down Syndrome, Fragile X Syndrome
What is being tested?
EGCG FontUp
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
76 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
29 Jan 2018to 30 Nov 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 to 12 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Males and females aged 6 to 12 years on day 1 of treatment.
  • Clinical diagnosis of DS (full trisomy 21 or translocated) confirmed by chromosomal analysis (karyotyping) (Cohort I) or molecular diagnosis for FXS (mutations or premutations on the fragile mental retardation 1 gene-Fmr1 of the X chromosome) (Cohort II). A karyotype will be performed if not available in DS population. FXS molecular diagnosis will be performed if not available in FXS population.
  • A body-weight under 50 kg.
  • Parent or legal guardian/representative and caregiver willing to give written informed consent.
  • Mental age ≥ 3 years (Brunet-Lézine scale C version, picture naming and receptive vocabulary of the WPPSI-IV)
  • Study participants must have sufficient vision and hearing to participate in study evaluations. Mild hearing loss will be allowed.
  • Availability of parent/caregiver to accompany the subject to clinical visits, provide information about the subject's behavior and symptoms and ensure compliance with the medication schedule.
  • Subjects must be able to understand basic instructions. Naming and comprehension tasks of the WPPSI-IV will be used as an evaluation

Who cannot join

  • Study participants with a current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) diagnosis of any primary psychiatric diagnosis (including autism spectrum disorder). For secondary diagnoses, such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, depression and conduct disorder, individuals under a fixed regime of medication (a regime that does not change in the 6 weeks prior to enrollment) are allowed as long as they are considered stable and their medication does not interfere with the progression of the study.
  • Personal history of infantile spasms, of epilepsy, of severe head trauma or Central Nervous System (CNS) infections (e.g. meningitis), with the exception of a single isolated febrile seizure.
  • Subjects with past history of seizures from primary causes (such as West syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome) or secondary causes.
  • Clinical history of moderate or severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) as defined by Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) (>15 events per hour not well controlled by positive airway pressure therapy with stable settings) for at least 3 months prior to screening visit.
  • Subjects with thyroid disease that is not controlled (elevated basal Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) > 10 microU/mL) by thyroid hormone respective therapy.
  • Evidence of active, clinically significant, and unstable gastrointestinal, renal, hepatic, endocrine or cardiovascular system disease.
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Cardiovascular, Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and/or Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) outside the 95th percentile for age; resting heart rate above 100 bpm.
  • Cardiovascular, ECG: clinically relevant ECG abnormalities at screening. Auscultation is mandatory part of cardiovascular examination.
  • Clinically significant abnormalities in laboratory test results at screening unless acceptable by the investigator.
  • Life-threatening illness or major surgery in the 3 months prior to the study.
  • Concomitant disease or condition or any clinically significant finding at screening that could interfere with the conduct of the study, or that would, in the opinion of the investigator, could lead to an unacceptable risk to the subject in this study.
  • Patients with risk factors of liver dysfunction such as previous history of liver disease, previous clinically significant hepatic abnormalities in laboratory testing, previous allergy or intolerance with liver disorders or any clinically significant abnormalities in hepatic laboratory testing at screening
  • Participation in other clinical trials in the last 3 months prior to the study.
  • Concomitant use of unapproved medication.
  • Current intake of vitamin supplements, catechins or products containing EGCG (i.e. TEAVIGO, Mega Green Tea capsules Life Extension or Font-UP Grand Fontaine Laboratories) for at least 3 months previous to the screening.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Spain1 site
  • IMIM (Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques)

    Barcelona, 08003

Other trials in Spain

About this study

To evaluate safety and tolerability of epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) in children from 6 to 12 years old with Intellectual Developmental Disorders (IDD) (Down syndrome or Fragile X syndrome).

Read the detailed description

This project first objective is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the EGCG molecule (extracted form green tea) on children from 6 to 12 years old with Intellectual Development Disorder (Down syndrome and Fragile X syndrome).

The secondary objective is to evaluate the benefits of the EGCG on attention, memory, executive functions, language and adaptive behaviour of these children. Dyrk1A and homocysteine in plasma will also be quantified, using them as biomarkers of efficacy.

Being tested
EGCG FontUp, Placebo FontUp
Keywords
Down Syndrome (DS), Fragile X Syndrome (FXS), Intellectual Development Disorder (IDD), FontUp, EGCG, Epigallocatechin gallate, Dual specificity tyrosine-phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1A (Dyrk1A), Homocysteine, Dietary supplement, Green tea, IMIM, PERSEUS
Medical subject headings
Down Syndrome, Fragile X Syndrome, Intellectual Disability

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EGCG FontUpDietary supplement

    Intake of 10mg/kg/day of EGCG, in the form of a dietary supplement (FontUp), two times a day.

  • Placebo FontUpOther

    Intake of placebo, in the form of a dietary supplement (FontUp) (without EGCG), two times a day.

Study groups in NCT03624556
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Experimental group DS and FXSExperimentalCohort 1: a 35 DS children group taking EGCG FontUp. Cohort 2: a 6 FXS children group taking EGCG FontUp. (Experimental open-label)
Receives: Dietary Supplement: EGCG FontUp
Control group DSPlacebo comparatorCohort 1: a 35 DS children group taking placebo FontUp.
Receives: Other: Placebo FontUp

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Safety Outcome Measure : Adverse Events

    Medical evaluations of incidence, nature, severity and causality of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events (SAE).

    Measured: From day -5 to day 252 (through study completion)

  2. Safety Outcome Measure: Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events with supporting evidence with blood analysis: Changes in liver function

    The finding of an elevated alanine transaminase (ALT) or aspartate transaminase (AST) (>3xULN), elevated total bilirubin (>2xULN)

    Measured: Days -5, 5, 42, 84, 126, and 168.

  3. Safety Outcome Measure: Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events with supporting evidence with blood analysis: Changes in thyroid function

    Elevated TSH (>10 microU/mL) or any decrease of free T4 below the lower limit of normal values (<0.8 ng/dL)

    Measured: Days -5, 42, 84, 126, and 168.

  4. Safety Outcome Measure: Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events with supporting evidence with blood analysis: Changes in renal function

    Serum creatinine will be measured at various time points and an increase exceeding x1.5 ULN (upper limit of normal values) that is confirmed by a repeat testing within 3 days.

    Measured: Days -15, 84, and 168

  5. Safety Outcome Measure: Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events with supporting evidence with Electroencephalography (EEG): Clinical significant changes in cerebral activity

    Electroencephalogram recording to detect epileptiform abnormalities and/or seizure activity and/or pro-convulsive effects in pediatric participants, enabling a deeper understanding of the pharmacological effects of the intervention.

    Measured: Days -15, 84, and 168

  6. Safety Outcome Measure: Measure: Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events with supporting evidence with Electrocardiogram: Clinical significant changes in QTcF

    A QTcF (Fridericia's correction) value (mean of the three measurements) exceeding 500 ms when confirmed in repeat measurement within 15-30 minutes will be recorded as SAE.

    A QTcF value exceeding a change from screening (mean of three time-matched measurements) of 60 ms when confirmed in repeat measurement within 15-30 minutes will be recorded as SAE.

    Measured: Days -56 and 168

  7. Safety Outcome Measure: Measure: Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events with supporting evidence with Echocardiogram: Clinical significant changes in size of the chambers of the heart.

    Doppler echocardiogram is used to look at how blood flows through the heart chambers, heart valves, and blood vessels. The movement of the blood reflects sound waves to a transducer. The ultrasound computer then measures the direction and speed of the blood flowing through heart and blood vessels.

    Measured: Days -56 and 168

  8. Safety Outcome Measure: Measure: Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events with supporting evidence with Echocardiogram: Clinical significant changes in pumping function of the heart.

    This measure is known as an ejection fraction or EF.

    Measured: Days -56 and 168

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Cognitive Outcome Measure : IDD-CHILD Battery. Cognitive changes in Expressive language

    Assessed by Picture Naming (PN) (WPPSI-IV). It is a verbal Comprehension subtest. It has 24 items. The child should name the drawings shown in the stimulus book. PN measures expressive language, ability and language development. Range score 0-24. Higher score is better outcome.

    Measured: Days -15, 168 and 252

  2. Cognitive Outcome Measure : IDD-CHILD Battery. Cognitive changes in Receptive language

    Assessed by Receptive Vocabulary (RV)(WPPSI-IV). It is a verbal comprehension subtest. It has 31 items. The child selects the picture that best represents the word the examiner reads aloud. RV measures receptive language ability and language development. Range score 0-40. Higher score is better outcome.

    Measured: Days -1,168 and 252

  3. Cognitive Outcome Measure : IDD-CHILD Battery. Cognitive changes in Memory and Learning

    Assessed by Sentence Repetition (NEPSY-II): This subtest is designed to assess the ability to repeat sentences of increasing complexity and length. The child is read a series of sentences and asked to recall each sentence immediately after it is presented. Range score 0-34. Higher score is better outcome.

    Measured: Days -1,168 and 252

  4. Cognitive Outcome Measure : IDD-CHILD Battery. Cognitive changes in Working Memory (WM)

    Assessed by Picture memory (WPPSI-IV). This subtest measures visual WM. It has 35 items. The child views a stimulus page of pictures for a specified time and then selects these pictures from options on a response page, for which a set of stimuli is viewed and then recognized from among a set of responses. Range score 0-35. Higher score is better outcome.

    Measured: Days -1,168 and 252

  5. Cognitive Outcome Measure : IDD-CHILD Battery. Cognitive changes in Verbal Fluency (VF)

    Subjects are asked to generate as many words as possible in 1 minute belonging to the category of "animals". No range score. A higher score is better outcome.

    Measured: Days -1,168 and 252

  6. Cognitive Outcome Measure : IDD-CHILD Battery. Cognitive changes in inhibition behavior

    Assessed by Cats \& Dogs Test. 16 pictures presented on a single strip of card (two trials with two conditions, control and experimental-inhibition). Measures of task accuracy in the experimental inhibition trial (total number of correct responses, range score 0-16) and total time performance (in seconds) were included in the analyses.

    Measured: Days -1,168 and 252

  7. Cognitive Outcome Measure : IDD-CHILD Battery. Cognitive changes in mental flexibility

    Assessed by Dimensional Change Card Sort (DCCS). Sort a series of bivalent test cards, according to one dimension(colour) or another(shape). Range score 0-24, higher score is better outcome.

    Measured: Days -1,84,168 and 252

  8. Cognitive Outcome Measure : IDD-CHILD Battery. Cognitive changes in Visual-spatial Process

    Assessed by Blocks Design(WPPSI-IV). It is a visual spatial subtest which has 17 items. It measures ability to analyze and synthesize abstract visual stimuli. Range score 0-34, higher score is better outcome.

    Measured: Days -1,168 and 252

  9. Functional Outcome Measure : IDD-CHILD Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales Scale Parent/Caregiver Interview Form, Second Edition (VABS-II)(Vineland™-II survey version)

    Changes in adaptive behavior

    • A. Communication domain: Sum of A1+A2+A3. Range Score 0-198
    • A1. Receptive subdomain: Range Score 0-40
    • A2. Expressive subdomain: Range Score 0-108
    • A3. Written subdomain: Range Score 0-50
    • B. Daily living skills domain: Sum of B1+B2+B3. Range Score 0-109
    • B1. Personal subdomain: Range Score 0-82
    • B2. Domestic subdomain: Range Score 0-48
    • B3. Community subdomain: Range Score 0-88
    • C. Socialization domain: Sum of C1+C2+C3. Range Score 0-180
    • C1. Interpersonal relationships subdomain: Range Score 0-64
    • C2. Play and leisure time subdomain: Range Score 0-62
    • C3. Coping skills subdomain: Range Score 0-60
    • Total score: Sum of A+B+C. Range Score 0-576

    For all measures: a higher score is a better outcome

    Measured: Days -1,168 and 252

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Aug 2018
  2. Study start29 Jan 2018
  3. Primary completion29 Mar 2020
  4. Study completion30 Nov 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Cohort I (Down Syndrome children): Phase II Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel groups to evaluate safety and tolerability of EGCG in children. The experimental group will take 10mg/kg/day of FontUp (EGCG on a dietary supplement with chocolate like shake flavor, two times a day) while the placebo group will take the same product but without the EGCG in it, taken with the same posology. Cohort II (Fragile X syndrome children): exploratory open label study (pilot study) to assess safety and tolerability of EGCG. These patients will receive 10mg/kg/day of FontUp. This cohort will only be recruited in Spanish sites.
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
76 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03624556
Sponsor's protocol ID
PERSEUS/1
Acronym
PERSEUS
Status last verified
Jun 2021
First submitted
6 Jun 2018
Last updated
11 Jun 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Nagle DG, Ferreira D, Zhou YD. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG): chemical and biomedical perspectives. Phytochemistry. 2006 Sep;67(17):1849-55. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2006.06.020. Epub 2006 Jul 31.

    PubMed 16876833
  • Megarbane A, Ravel A, Mircher C, Sturtz F, Grattau Y, Rethore MO, Delabar JM, Mobley WC. The 50th anniversary of the discovery of trisomy 21: the past, present, and future of research and treatment of Down syndrome. Genet Med. 2009 Sep;11(9):611-6. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181b2e34c.

    PubMed 19636252
  • Khoshnood B, Greenlees R, Loane M, Dolk H; EUROCAT Project Management Committee; EUROCAT Working Group. Paper 2: EUROCAT public health indicators for congenital anomalies in Europe. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2011 Mar;91 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S16-22. doi: 10.1002/bdra.20776. Epub 2011 Mar 4.

    PubMed 21381186
  • Vicari S, Carlesimo GA. Short-term memory deficits are not uniform in Down and Williams syndromes. Neuropsychol Rev. 2006 Jun;16(2):87-94. doi: 10.1007/s11065-006-9008-4. Epub 2006 Aug 9.

    PubMed 16967345
  • Ronan A, Fagan K, Christie L, Conroy J, Nowak NJ, Turner G. Familial 4.3 Mb duplication of 21q22 sheds new light on the Down syndrome critical region. J Med Genet. 2007 Jul;44(7):448-51. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2006.047373. Epub 2007 Jan 19.

    PubMed 17237124
  • Dowjat WK, Adayev T, Kuchna I, Nowicki K, Palminiello S, Hwang YW, Wegiel J. Trisomy-driven overexpression of DYRK1A kinase in the brain of subjects with Down syndrome. Neurosci Lett. 2007 Feb 8;413(1):77-81. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.11.026. Epub 2006 Dec 4.

    PubMed 17145134
  • Altafaj X, Dierssen M, Baamonde C, Marti E, Visa J, Guimera J, Oset M, Gonzalez JR, Florez J, Fillat C, Estivill X. Neurodevelopmental delay, motor abnormalities and cognitive deficits in transgenic mice overexpressing Dyrk1A (minibrain), a murine model of Down's syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 2001 Sep 1;10(18):1915-23. doi: 10.1093/hmg/10.18.1915.

    PubMed 11555628
  • Belichenko PV, Kleschevnikov AM, Salehi A, Epstein CJ, Mobley WC. Synaptic and cognitive abnormalities in mouse models of Down syndrome: exploring genotype-phenotype relationships. J Comp Neurol. 2007 Oct 1;504(4):329-45. doi: 10.1002/cne.21433.

    PubMed 17663443
  • Dierssen M. Down syndrome: the brain in trisomic mode. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012 Dec;13(12):844-58. doi: 10.1038/nrn3314.

    PubMed 23165261
  • Ji J, Lee H, Argiropoulos B, Dorrani N, Mann J, Martinez-Agosto JA, Gomez-Ospina N, Gallant N, Bernstein JA, Hudgins L, Slattery L, Isidor B, Le Caignec C, David A, Obersztyn E, Wisniowiecka-Kowalnik B, Fox M, Deignan JL, Vilain E, Hendricks E, Horton Harr M, Noon SE, Jackson JR, Wilkens A, Mirzaa G, Salamon N, Abramson J, Zackai EH, Krantz I, Innes AM, Nelson SF, Grody WW, Quintero-Rivera F. DYRK1A haploinsufficiency causes a new recognizable syndrome with microcephaly, intellectual disability, speech impairment, and distinct facies. Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 Nov;23(11):1473-81. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.71. Epub 2015 May 6.

    PubMed 25944381
  • Benavides-Piccione R, Dierssen M, Ballesteros-Yanez I, Martinez de Lagran M, Arbones ML, Fotaki V, DeFelipe J, Elston GN. Alterations in the phenotype of neocortical pyramidal cells in the Dyrk1A+/- mouse. Neurobiol Dis. 2005 Oct;20(1):115-22. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2005.02.004.

    PubMed 16137572
  • Pujol J, del Hoyo L, Blanco-Hinojo L, de Sola S, Macia D, Martinez-Vilavella G, Amor M, Deus J, Rodriguez J, Farre M, Dierssen M, de la Torre R. Anomalous brain functional connectivity contributing to poor adaptive behavior in Down syndrome. Cortex. 2015 Mar;64:148-56. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.10.012. Epub 2014 Oct 28.

    PubMed 25461715
  • de Sola S, de la Torre R, Sanchez-Benavides G, Benejam B, Cuenca-Royo A, Del Hoyo L, Rodriguez J, Catuara-Solarz S, Sanchez-Gutierrez J, Duenas-Espin I, Hernandez G, Pena-Casanova J, Langohr K, Videla S, Blehaut H, Farre M, Dierssen M; TESDAD Study Group. A new cognitive evaluation battery for Down syndrome and its relevance for clinical trials. Front Psychol. 2015 Jun 4;6:708. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00708. eCollection 2015.

    PubMed 26089807
  • Ruiz-Mejias M, Martinez de Lagran M, Mattia M, Castano-Prat P, Perez-Mendez L, Ciria-Suarez L, Gener T, Sancristobal B, Garcia-Ojalvo J, Gruart A, Delgado-Garcia JM, Sanchez-Vives MV, Dierssen M. Overexpression of Dyrk1A, a Down Syndrome Candidate, Decreases Excitability and Impairs Gamma Oscillations in the Prefrontal Cortex. J Neurosci. 2016 Mar 30;36(13):3648-59. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2517-15.2016.

    PubMed 27030752
  • Ruben K, Wurzlbauer A, Walte A, Sippl W, Bracher F, Becker W. Selectivity Profiling and Biological Activity of Novel beta-Carbolines as Potent and Selective DYRK1 Kinase Inhibitors. PLoS One. 2015 Jul 20;10(7):e0132453. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132453. eCollection 2015.

    PubMed 26192590

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing EGCG FontUp in people with Down Syndrome and Fragile X Syndrome, run by Parc de Salut Mar at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jun 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Safety Outcome Measure : Adverse Events (time frame: From day -5 to day 252 (through study completion)). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03624556, which also lists 20 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jun 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in