AzTrials
AzTrials

Child AbuseNCT03625206

Cognitive Bias Modification Training in Adolescents Who Have Experienced Adversity

A study testing Cognitive bias modification training in people with Child Abuse and Child Neglect, run by Institute of Psychiatry, London at 2 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Adolescents who have experienced adversity (childhood maltreatment and other forms of broader victimisation experiences) will be randomly allocated to receive a 5-session cognitive bias modification training (with attention and interpretation bias modification modules) or a control condition. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 to 18 years
Conditions the study is for
Child Abuse, Child Neglect, Victimization
What is being tested?
Cognitive bias modification training
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
50 participants
Where
2 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
17 Apr 2018to 17 May 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adolescents aged 12-18 years
  • Adolescents who have experienced adversity (abuse, neglect) or broader victimisation experiences (conventional crime)

Who cannot join

  • Adolescents who have difficulty reading or understanding what is being read to them
  • Adolescents who are currently at-risk for self-harm
  • Adolescents who are currently experiencing psychotic symptoms
  • Adolescents who are currently experiencing high-level trauma symptoms

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 2 countries.

2 sites in 2 countries

India1 site
  • Psychology Department

    Varanasi

Other trials in India

Nepal1 site
  • Psychology Department, Tribuwan University

    Kathmandu

Other trials in Nepal

About this study

Adolescents who have experienced adversity (childhood maltreatment and other forms of broader victimisation experiences) will be randomly allocated to receive a 5-session cognitive bias modification training (with attention and interpretation bias modification modules) or a control condition. Outcome measures include measures of cognitive biases and symptoms of psychopathology; in addition, in a subset of adolescents, brain activity data will be acquired. All adolescents will complete a feedback form, upon which acceptability of the intervention will be assessed.

Read the detailed description

Up to 80 adolescents aged 12-18 years who have experienced adversity (childhood maltreatment and other forms of broader victimisation experiences) from India and Nepal will be randomly allocated to receive a 5-session cognitive bias modification training (with attention and interpretation bias modification modules) or a control condition over a 2-week period.

Pre and post-assessment measures include measures of attention and interpretation biases and symptoms of internalising and externalising psychopathology. In addition, in a subset of adolescents, brain activity data acquired using EEG will be acquired either during resting or viewing emotional face stimuli. Data from these measures will be used to generate effect sizes of changes for each group as well as being used in a limited number of significance-testing analysis. All adolescents will complete a feedback form, upon which acceptability of the intervention will be assessed.

Being tested
Cognitive bias modification training, Control training

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cognitive bias modification trainingBehavioural

    These training sessions aim to modify a selective attention bias towards threat and a tendency to interpret ambiguous situations in threatening ways

  • Control trainingBehavioural

    These exercises are matched to the task demands of the modules of cognitive bias modification training

Study groups in NCT03625206
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cognitive bias modification trainingExperimentalParticipants will receive 5 training sessions, each session including attention bias modification and interpretation bias modification training modules
Receives: Behavioral: Cognitive bias modification training
Control trainingPlacebo comparatorParticipants will receive 5 sessions that involve exercises that are matched to the task demands of the attention bias modification and interpretation bias modification training modules
Receives: Behavioral: Control training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Attention biases for threatening stimuli

    The investigators will use an experimental measure (a visual search task) that uses reaction times (RTs) to different experimental conditions to index the degree to which attention is captured by a threatening over a non-threatening stimulus.

    Measured: Immediately after the intervention (post-intervention)

  2. Interpretation biases for threatening explanations

    The investigators will use an experimental measure (an ambiguous scenarios task) that uses ratings to different experimental trials to index the degree to which individuals endorse threatening over benign interpretations

    Measured: Immediately after the intervention (post-intervention)

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Symptoms of emotional, behavioural and social problems

    5 subscales of the Strength and Difficulties questionnaire

    Measured: Immediately after the intervention (post-intervention)

  2. Acceptability of intervention

    The investigators have developed a 19-item self-report feedback, comprising quantitative ratings and qualitative responses. Across eleven items, young people rate on a 4-point Likert scale whether they found the training useful, satisfying, engaging, realistic, whether it impacted anxiety, mood, coping strategies, and other difficulties , and whether they would feel motivated to complete the sessions, including without a researcher present. Higher scores reflect greater endorsement. Each of these items will be reported separately rather than used to create composite scores. There are also 8 open ended questions for young people to leave their feedback on aspects they found helpful, unhelpful, liked, disliked, improvements they would want, and other general comments.

    Measured: Immediately after the intervention (post-intervention)

  3. Event related potentials to emotional face presentations during Electroencephalogram (EEG) experiment

    P1, N1, P2, N2, P3 event-related potentials during face presentation

    Measured: Immediately after the intervention (post-intervention)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Aug 2018
  2. Study start17 Apr 2018
  3. Primary completion17 May 2020
  4. Study completion17 May 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
50 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03625206
Sponsor's protocol ID
PAHBABR
Status last verified
Aug 2020
First submitted
4 Jul 2018
Last updated
11 Aug 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: All data will be anonymised such that each participant will be associated with a unique identification (ID) number. These will be uploaded to data repository sites once data collection, analysis and dissemination is completed

Publications

  • Dhakal S, Gupta S, Sharma NP, Upadhyay A, Oliver A, Sumich A, Kumari V, Niraula S, Pandey R, Lau JYF. Can we challenge attention and interpretation threat biases in rescued child labourers with a history of physical abuse using a computerised cognitive training task? Data on feasibility, acceptability and target engagement. Behav Res Ther. 2023 Mar;162:104267. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2023.104267. Epub 2023 Jan 29.

    PubMed 36780810

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Cognitive bias modification training in people with Child Abuse and Child Neglect, run by Institute of Psychiatry, London at 2 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Aug 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in India, Nepal. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Attention biases for threatening stimuli (time frame: Immediately after the intervention (post-intervention)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03625206, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Aug 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in