AzTrials
AzTrials

Epidural; AnesthesiaMC-PMSNCT03625232

Epidural Space Verification With the CompuFlo®

An observational study of Epidural; Anesthesia, run by European e-Learning School in Obstetric Anesthesia at 11 sites in 6 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this single arm open-label study is to capture additional data that can add to the original COMPASS (CompuFlo® Assessment Study) clinical trial database that supported the 510(k) application, which was given clearance by the FDA on June 9, 2017. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 years
Conditions the study is for
Epidural; Anesthesia
How many people
250 participants
Where
11 sitesin 6 countries
Study dates
1 Mar 2019to 30 Oct 2019
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The subject population for this study will consist of up to 800 adult subjects between the ages of 18 and 90 (had 18th birthday and had not had their 91st birthday - except for State of Alabama where legal consent for adults is age of 19), of any ethnic background, for whom an epidural procedure is indicated according to their HCP. The subject will meet all the inclusion criteria, have none of the exclusion criteria, give their written Informed Consent to participate in this clinical study after undergoing informed consent process, In the event that a subject's ability to comprehend and communicate is compromised (per the discretion of the Principal Investigator), a legal representative may discuss the study, agree on participation and sign the ICF, on behalf of the subject.

Who may be able to join

  • The subject is at least 18 years of age at screening, but has not had his/her 91st birthday.
  • The subject is required to have epidural procedure implemented as part of their standard medical treatment according to Principal Investigator assessment.
  • The subject and/or legally authorized person/representative is willing to undergo the Informed Consent process prior to enrollment into this study.
  • The subject is willing to participate in this study for at least 30 days after the epidural procedure implementation.
  • The subject is willing to participate in this study for at least 3 days after the procedure.

Who cannot join

  • Contraindications for epidural procedure / anesthesia (circumstances where the risks associated with epidural procedures are higher than usual. These circumstances are, but not limited to, anatomical abnormalities, such as spina bifida or scoliosis, infection at or near the site of insertion, allergy to the anesthetic or intended drug, uncorrected hypovolemia, increased intracranial pressure etc.).
  • Patients presenting for emergency C-section or other emergencies.
  • Exclusive use of other treatments such as intravenous analgesia with opioids.
  • Prior back surgery in lumbar area that would prevent epidural access.
  • Preexisting neurological deficit that would interfere with dermatome identification.
  • The subject observed seizure within 7 days prior to study enrollment.
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Presumed and/or confirmed septic embolus.
  • The subject has a skin condition (i.e., hemangioma, scleroderma, psoriasis, rash, open wound or tattoo) in their lumbar region greater than 4 cm2.
  • The subject previously participated in another investigational drug or device trial within the preceding 4 weeks.
  • Severe co-existing or terminal systemic disease that limits life expectancy or may interfere with study procedures.
  • The subject is otherwise determined by the Investigator to be medically unsuitable for participation in this study

Trial locations and contacts

11 sites in 6 countries.

11 sites in 6 countries

Italy6 sites
  • Casa di Cura Gibiino, Università di Catania

    Catania

  • Careggi Hospital

    Florence

  • Casa Sollievo Sofferenza, S Giovanni Rotondo

    Foggia

  • Clinica Mangiagalli

    Milan

  • Ospedale Buccheri La Ferla

    Palermo

  • Città di Roma Hospital

    Rome

Other trials in Italy

Belgium1 site
  • University Hospital Leuven

    Leuven

Other trials in Belgium

Chile1 site
  • Alemanno Hospital

    Santiago

Other trials in Chile

Germany1 site
  • Klinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie

    Würzburg

Other trials in Germany

Spain1 site
  • Madrid University Hospital

    Madrid

Other trials in Spain

United Kingdom1 site
  • Frimley Park Hospital

    Frimley

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Multi-Center Post-Marketing Study Protocol: (MC-PMS) A Single-arm Open Label Observational Study to Further Document the Safety and Effectiveness of the Epidural Space Verification With the CompuFlo® Epidural Computer Controlled System

The purpose of this single arm open-label study is to capture additional data that can add to the original COMPASS (CompuFlo® Assessment Study) clinical trial database that supported the 510(k) application, which was given clearance by the FDA on June 9, 2017.

Read the detailed description

Patients will receive lumbar epidural anesthesia by a HCP, as detailed below. The CompuFlo Epidural System will be utilized only for steps d-g, all other steps are performed in the same way as with the Loss of Resistance Syringe. Refer to User Manual for detailed instructions on how to set up the system.

  1. American Society of Anesthesiologists standard monitors will be attached and patients will be placed in a sitting position. Sedation will not be permitted due to potential confounding of the data and/or making it impossible to assess neurological injury/paresthesias during the procedure. Limited Vital signs (blood pressure, apical heart rate, oral temperature, respiration rate) will be obtained and documented in the CRF.
  2. Set up the CompuFlo System disposable kit and attach kit to instrument.
  3. Connect the pressure sensor to the ID adapter.
  4. Connect the ID adapter to the CompuFlo instrument.
  5. Connect the external pressure sensor to the filled 20 mL syringe.
  6. Connect the extension tubing to the other end of the pressure sensor.
  7. The lumbar area will be disinfected and draped in the usual fashion. The skin in the lumbar area will be locally infiltrated with a local anesthetic solution, according to local practice.
  8. The epidural needle will be introduced in the lumbar area to a depth of approximately 3 cm. Insertion to a depth of 3 cm is typical in clinical practice, to avoid accidental epidural space puncture by inserting the needle too deep, while at the same time inserting the needle to a depth at which it will be supported by the tissue.
  9. Purge (i.e., prime) the extension tubing connected to the CompuFlo instrument.
  10. The CompuFlo extension tubing set will be held at the same vertical height as the puncture level of the epidural needle to calibrate the pressure by depressing the "Zero" button of the CompuFlo® instrument. This will zero the pressure prior to connection of the epidural needle to the extension tubing. The stylet of the epidural needle will be removed and extension tubing will be connected after making the zeroed pressure calibration at the puncture's level.
  11. The CompuFlo Epidural Instrument will be set to deliver normal saline at a rate of 0.050 mL/sec during these measurements with an exit-pressure limit not to exceed 120 mm/Hg.
  12. The epidural Tuohy needle (18-gauge 3-1/2 inch or any other size) will then be advanced until the pressure readings on the CompuFlo Epidural System indicate position in the epidural space as defined below. The following criteria is used to differentiate a True-Loss of Resistance (True-LOR) versus the identification of a False-Loss of Resistance (False-LOR) using the CompuFlo Epidural Instrument: A True-LOR defined as: An increase in pressure followed by a sudden and sustained (> 5 seconds) drop in pressure (typically greater than 50% of the maximum pressure), resulting in the formation of a "low and stable pressure plateau" A False-LOR defined as: An increase of pressure followed by a drop in pressure (typically less than 50% of the maximum pressure) that is either not sustained or inconclusive of representing a "low and stable pressure plateau" -If the pressure rapidly increases after a drop of pressure this is identified as a False-Loss of Resistance and the operator may elect to continue to advance the needle. A Inconclusive-LOR defined as: -If the pressure does not increase or is deemed to be inconclusive (Undeterminable) loss of resistance the operator should withdraw the needle and/or redirect the needle. This will be considered an Inconclusive-LOR (I-LOR) Number of attempts* will be defined and measured as follows:
  13. Number of needle withdrawals and reinsertions at the same interspace
  14. Number of needle withdrawals and reinsertions at a different interspace
  15. Number needle redirections in case of bone contact
  16. Number needle redirections due to operator's uncertainty of needle location (inconclusive or undeterminable) loss of resistance *Definitions: 1 and 2: the needle is completely withdrawn and reinserted from the skin 3 an 4: the needle is redirected and/or partially withdrawn to allow redirection within the tissues of the chosen interspace NOTE: When every a drop of pressure occurs during the advancement** of a needle it is critical that the operator simultaneously STOP ALL NEEDLE MOVEMENT to determine if any further pressure changes will occur based on the position of the needle. ** NOTE: The CompuFlo-Epidural Instrument is a highly accurate device capable of recording all information continuously and precisely. Be aware that the operator can introduce pressure artifacts to the data recordings if imprecise needle movements are used, such as a rapid advancement and/or rapid withdrawals of the needle not representative of standard clinical needle movements. The pressure wave-form slope of the curve is impacted by imprecise needle movements. Therefore, slow deliberate needle movements are recommended. The readings on the CompuFlo Epidural Instrument that correlate with correct epidural space identification (True-LOR) based on the previous trial conducted by Ghelber et al. consist of the following criteria: After documenting the significant drop in pressure for at least 5 seconds, with no further needle movement:
  17. Record an additional 5 seconds of pressure data, with the motor running to identify the formation of a low and stable low pressure plateau, (typically greater than 50% of the maximum pressure).
  18. Press STOP and continue to record pressure for 5 additional seconds, after the motor has stopped, while the needle is still in the epidural space to record the EPIDURAL SPACE PRESSURE.
  19. To investigate possible waveform patterns which may confirm the entrance of the needle in the epidural space, after these additional 5 seconds, request that patient either "cough" and record the epidural pressure (PRESSURE AFTER COUGH) or perform a 2-3 seconds Valsalva maneuver and record the epidural pressure at the apex of the maneuvre (PRESSURE AFTER VALSALVA) .
  20. Once the CompuFlo® procedure is complete, Press END PROCEDURE to ensure that the data file is properly saved. Then Press YES to terminate procedure. NOTE: Avoiding this step will lead to the loss and/or corruption of data file. These steps provide a secondary means of verification of the epidural space. If the correct position of the epidural Tuohy needle in the epidural space (as indicated by the readings on the CompuFlo® Epidural System) can NOT be obtained or dye injection indicates incorrect position or an epidural catheter cannot be advanced into the epidural space, then the epidural Tuohy needle will be withdrawn or redirected and a new attempt of epidural Tuohy needle insertion and identification of the epidural space with the CompuFlo® Epidural System will begin. Alternatively, the HCP and/or anesthesiologist can choose to completely remove the epidural Tuohy needle and insert at a new puncture site and a new attempt of epidural Tuohy needle insertion and identification of the epidural space with the CompuFlo® Epidural System will begin. The local investigator may decide after a number of failed recorded attempts to suspend the procedure. Then, epidural anesthesia with the CompuFlo® Epidural System will be considered unsuccessful and the patient will be converted to other forms of analgesia.
  21. After successful epidural space identification, the CompuFlo® Epidural System will be disconnected from the epidural needle and an epidural catheter will be advanced 3-5cm into the epidural space, or injection will proceed according to standard medical practice if there is no introduction of an epidural catheter.
  22. After removal of the epidural needle and securing of the epidural catheter, an epidural test dose consisting - in the case of epidural labor analgesia - of the therapeutic dose, if a low concentration local anesthetic solution is used (e.g., bupivacaine 0.0625%) or a 3 mL epidural test dose (lidocaine 15 mg/mL with epinephrine 5 mcg/mL), if a high concentration (e.g., bupivacaine 0.25, 0.125%) is used, will be manually infused to rule out intrathecal or intravascular catheter position for those procedures where test dose is considered standard medical practice.
  23. Epidural anesthesia or any medical treatment according to HCP order will then be delivered by dosing the epidural catheter with a local anesthetic/medication of the HCP's choice and a volume of their choice that should conform to that described in the local anesthetic's labeling.

For a woman in labor, successful performance of epidural procedure will be defined as the occurrence of analgesia assessed by Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAPS), after a predetermined period of time from the epidural loading dose. (Ex., a VAPS < 10 at 20 min.) For other epidural procedures, successful performance of an epidural procedure will be defined as a loss of sensation to cold in at least in one dermatome. Alternatively, for subjects not in a labor while undergoing epidural procedures that are assisted by fluoroscopy, successful performance will be defined as correct spread of dye in the epidural space, as judged by an independent HCP.

At that time limited vital signs (blood pressure, apical heart rate, oral temperature, respiration rate) will be obtained and documented in the CRF.

In case of a unilateral block, the HCP will be permitted to manipulate the catheter at their discretion (e.g., withdraw the catheter) and re-dose the catheter. In such case, another assessment of loss of sensation to cold as described above will be permitted 30 min after catheter re-dosing to assess whether epidural anesthesia was successful (same criteria as above).

If analgesia for women in labor or one dermatome for other patients cannot be established, epidural procedure/anesthesia will be considered unsuccessful and the patient will receive analgesia or anesthesia at the discretion of the HCP.

The number of attempts (needle redirection and reinsertions) will be recorded.

For those sites performing fluoroscopy/dye injection, an indication of incorrect spread of the dye will be considered failure.

Within thirty minutes after dosing the epidural catheter, a blinded investigator will assess the patient for sensory and motor blockade.

Concomitant medication, including conversion to general anesthesia, along with any adverse events will also be recorded.

All of these assessments will be recorded in the source documents and on the appropriate CRFs.

After the completion of the epidural procedure, the physician will complete the Compuflo Assessment Score Questionnaire (Section 9.4) to assess the agreement between the physician' s reported sensation and the variation of pressure given by the CompuFlo® during the needle tracking from its insertion until the identification of the epidural space.

Any occurrence of accidental dural puncture with the Tuohy needle during the epidural procedure assisted by Compuflo will be recorded on the data sheet.

The occurrence of Post Dural Puncture Headache (PDPH) will be also recorded. PDPH will be defined according to the Classification Committee of The International Headache Society (https://www.ichd-3.org/7-headache-attributed-to-non-vascular-intracranial-disorder/7-2-headache-attributed-to-low-cerebrospinal-fluid-pressure/7-2-1-post-dural-puncture-headache/)

Being tested
CompuFlo® Epidural Computer Controlled System

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CompuFlo® Epidural Computer Controlled SystemDevice

    The CompuFlo® Epidural Instrument allows the objective identification of the epidural space by pressure measurement at the needle tip and consequently enables the HCP to perform epidural anesthesia and epidural injections using standard methods. Currently, HCPs rely on their subjective perception to feel a "loss of resistance" when inserting an epidural needle to identify the epidural space. The CompuFlo® Epidural Computer Controlled Anesthesia System has received a CE mark in the European Union and it received 510(k) clearance from the FDA in June 2017.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Effectiveness: Visual Analogue Pain Scale

    Number of patients with Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAPS ) score (0 = non pain; 100 = maximum pain) less than 20 after 20/30 minutes from the epidural analgesic loading dose or for those patients for whom fluoroscopy is performed: Number of patients having correct spread of dye in the epidural space as observed by fluoroscopy

    Measured: 20 minutes

  2. Epidural identification

    To Identify and differentiate True-LOR vs. False-LOR and/or Inconclusive-LOR during ES identification by using the Compuflo Epidural Instrument recordings of pressure (delta, mmHg)

    A True-LOR defined as:

    An increase in pressure followed by a sudden and sustained (> 5 seconds) drop in pressure (mmHg) resulting in the formation of a low and stable pressure plateau

    A False-LOR defined as:

    An increase of pressure (mmHg) followed by a drop in pressure that is either not sustained or inconclusive of representing a "low and stable pressure plateau" If the pressure (mmHg) rapidly increases after a drop of pressure this is identified as a False-Loss of Resistance and the operator may elect to continue to advance the needle.

    Measured: 15 minutes

  3. Complications

    Number of patients having inadvertent dural punture Number of patients having post dural punture headache

    Measured: 36 hours

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Physician Concordance Index

    The agreement between the physician's reported sensation and the variation of pressure given by the CompuFlo® during the needle tracking from its insertion until the identification of the epidural space will be evaluated by using a 5 poin Likert scale

    1 2 3 4 5 (From Strongly disagree to Strongly agree) Completed immediately after each procedure by the physician who performed block

    Measured: 24 hours

  2. Secondary Epidural Veriification

    After documenting the significant drop in pressure (mmHg) for at least 5 seconds, with no further needle movement:

    1. additional 5 seconds of pressure data (mmHg) will be recorded to identify the formation of a low and stable low pressure plateau
    2. Compuflo motor will be stopped and the pressure will be recorded for 5 additional seconds, while the needle is still in the epidural space to record the EPIDURAL SPACE PRESSURE (mmHg).
    3. The patients will be requested either to cough and the epidural pressure will be recorded (PRESSURE AFTER COUGH, mmHg)) or to perform a 2-3 seconds Valsalva maneuver andthe epidural pressure at the apex of the maneuvre (PRESSURE AFTER VALSALVA, mmHg) will be recorded .

    Measured: 15 minutes

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Aug 2018
  2. Study start1 Mar 2019
  3. Primary completion30 Oct 2019
  4. Study completion30 Oct 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
250 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03625232
Sponsor's protocol ID
EESOA
Acronym
MC-PMS
Status last verified
Dec 2019
First submitted
2 Aug 2018
Last updated
20 Dec 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Capogna G, Coccoluto A, Capogna E, Del Vecchio A. Objective Evaluation of a New Epidural Simulator by the CompuFlo(R) Epidural Instrument. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2018 Jun 26;2018:4710263. doi: 10.1155/2018/4710263. eCollection 2018.

    PubMed 30046305

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Epidural; Anesthesia, run by European e-Learning School in Obstetric Anesthesia at 11 sites in 6 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Dec 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 11 sites in Italy, Belgium, Chile, Germany, Spain and 1 more country. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Effectiveness: Visual Analogue Pain Scale (time frame: 20 minutes). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03625232, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Dec 2019; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 28 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in