Chronic DiseaseNCT03628963
Optimizing Patient Usability Experience for Chronic Care
A study testing Concerto+ in people with Chronic Disease, run by Laval University at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
The study aims to develop a module of an eHealth platform, do a feasibility study through a pilot cluster randomized control trial and assess the scalability of the solution. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Disease
- What is being tested?
- Concerto+
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Sep 2018to Nov 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Having one or more targeted chronic diseases (diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia)
- had 3 or more visits in the last 12 months
- having an interest in health and technologies,
- be able to read and speak in French
Who cannot join
- Majors whose incapacity has been recognised judically
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
Université Laval
Québec, Quebec, G1V0A6
Marie-Pierre Gagnon, PhD, 4186562131 ext. 7576, marie-pierre.gagnon@ulaval.ca
MameAwa Ndiaye, MA, 418-663-5700, mame-awa.ndiaye.ciussscn@ssss.gouv.qc.ca
About this study
Official title: Personalize Concerto: A Study Protocol for Optimizing Patient Usability Experience With an eHealth Platform for Embedded, Coordinated and Efficient Healthcare
The study aims to develop a module of an eHealth platform, do a feasibility study through a pilot cluster randomized control trial and assess the scalability of the solution.
Read the detailed description
Multimorbidity increases care needs and primary care use among people with chronic diseases (1). The Concerto Health Program (CHP) has been developed to optimize chronic disease management in primary care services. However, in its current version, the CHP primarily targets clinicians and does not aim to respond directly to the needs of patients and their informal caregivers for chronic disease management . This project aims to develop, implement and evaluate a user-centered, multifunctional and personalized eHealth platform (CONCERTO+) to promote a more active patient role in chronic disease management and decision-making through three phases.
For phase1: A first prototype will be developed by the design and technology teams, in close collaboration with researchers, health professionals and patient representatives who will identify the functionalities to include in the CONCERTO+ solution.
The Phase 2 of the project will consist in a feasibility study based on a pilot cluster randomized clinical trial (c-RCT) where patients with chronic diseases from a primary healthcare practice will receive CONCERTO+ and be compared to patients from a control practice receiving usual care.
For Phase 3, the analysis of CONCERTO+ potential for scaling-up will be done by documenting factors and conditions associated with the sustainability and scaling-up of the solution. To do so, the investigators will conduct: 1) two focus groups with patients and informal caregivers who participated in the study (one with the experimental group and one with the control group, each group gathering between eight and twelve participants); 2) semi-structured individual interviews with health professionals at the two study sites, as well as with health care managers, information officers, and representatives of the Ministry of Health and Social Services.
- Conditions
- Chronic Disease
- Being tested
- Concerto+
- Keywords
- Diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia
- Medical subject headings
- Chronic Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, Dyslipidemias
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Concerto+Device
a user-centered, multifunctional and personalized eHealth platform
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Concerto+ (Intervention group) | Experimental | Patients with two or more targeted chronic diseases (diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia) and who had three or more visits in the last 12 months will use Concerto+ application during 6 months. Receives: Device: Concerto+ |
| Usual care (Control group) | No intervention | Patients with two or more targeted chronic diseases (diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia) and who had three or more visits in the last 12 months will not use the application Concerto+ but receive usual care from FMG. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patient Activation
The Patient Activation Measure -13 (2) is built on patient knowledge, skills and confidence that are directly targeted by the intervention and is associated to their activation level. Patients who are more activated have better health outcomes. Patients answer to a survey of 13 questions with the following scoring for each answer:
Strongly disagree = 1; Disagree = 2; Agree = 3; strongly agree = 4
The score of the activation level obtained (between 0 and 100) shows the degree of ability to manage their health with confidence according to the following scale ranges:
- Not believing that activation is important (≤ 47)
- Lack of knowledge or confidence to take action (47.1 - 55.1)
- Beginning to take action (55.2 - 67)
- Taking action (≥ 67.1).
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Process of care
The effects of the use of Concerto + will be assessed and measured, using an adapted version of a survey from Glasgow et al. [3] and validated in the previous CHP (Concerto Health Program) assessment. Patients answer to a questionnaire six months after the use of Concerto+. 5 scales based on the key components of Concerto + are defined, and each scale include items: Solving-problems/Advices (4 items), Delivery System Design/Decision support (3 items), Goal Setting/Tailoring (5 items), Follow-up/coordination (5 items), Overall care (9 items). Items are scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (Almost never) to 5 (Almost always), through following subscales 2 (Generally not); 3 (Sometimes); 4 (Most of the time). Higher scores from the assessment survey have better effects in care outcomes.
Measured: 9 months
Acceptability
The acceptability of the device Concerto+ will be assessed by patient and informal caregiver, at the end of the intervention with:
- A short survey adapted from the Technology Acceptance Model [4] that includes 3 criteria (perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, behavioral intention to use) with the following scoring: Strongly disagree = 1; Disagree = 2; Agree = 3; strongly agree = 4. Higher scores rates have a better acceptance of the use of Concerto+.
- The use of CONCERTO+ that will be measured by logs (Tests numbers, emergency visits, hospitalizations).
Measured: 9 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Aug 2018
- Study startSep 2018 (estimated)
- Primary completionJan 2019 (estimated)
- Study completionNov 2019 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Two Family Medicine Groups (FMG) from the same health region but covering distinct areas have been selected as the clusters. The FMGs will be randomily selected for the experimental (CONCERTO+) or control (usual care) group.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Laval University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Concerto Health Group Montréal, Qc, Canada, International Business Machines (IBM), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Université de Montréal, Haute Ecole de Santé Vaud (HESAV), Lausanne, Switzerland
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Marie-Pierre Gagnon, Laval University
- Investigators
- Marie-Pierre Gagnon, Ph.D, Principal investigator, Faculty of Nursing, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03628963
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2018-067/01-06-2018
- Status last verified
- Aug 2018
- First submitted
- 9 Aug 2018
- Last updated
- 22 Aug 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Fortin M, Contant E, Savard C, Hudon C, Poitras ME, Almirall J. Canadian guidelines for clinical practice: an analysis of their quality and relevance to the care of adults with comorbidity. BMC Fam Pract. 2011 Jul 13;12:74. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-12-74.
PubMed 21752267Hibbard JH, Mahoney ER, Stockard J, Tusler M. Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure. Health Serv Res. 2005 Dec;40(6 Pt 1):1918-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00438.x.
PubMed 16336556Glasgow RE, Wagner EH, Schaefer J, Mahoney LD, Reid RJ, Greene SM. Development and validation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC). Med Care. 2005 May;43(5):436-44. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000160375.47920.8c.
PubMed 15838407Davis, F.D., Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 1989: p. 319-340
Gagnon MP, Ndiaye MA, Larouche A, Chabot G, Chabot C, Buyl R, Fortin JP, Giguere A, Leblanc A, Legare F, Motulsky A, Sicotte C, Witteman HO, Kavanagh E, Lepinay F, Roberge J, Deletroz C, Abbasgholizadeh-Rahimi S. Optimising patient active role with a user-centred eHealth platform (CONCERTO+) in chronic diseases management: a study protocol for a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 2;9(4):e028554. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028554.
PubMed 30944143
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Aug 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Personalize Concerto: A Study Protocol for Optimizing Patient Usability Experience With an eHealth Platform for Embedded, Coordinated and Efficient Healthcare
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03628963
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2018-067/01-06-2018
- Conditions
- Chronic Disease
- Keywords
- Diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Laval UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Concerto Health Group Montréal, Qc, Canada, International Business Machines (IBM), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Université de Montréal, Haute Ecole de Santé Vaud (HESAV), Lausanne, Switzerland
- Study start
- Sep 2018 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Jan 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Nov 2019 (estimated)
- First posted
- 14 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study aims to develop a module of an eHealth platform, do a feasibility study through a pilot cluster randomized control trial and assess the scalability of the solution.
Detailed description
Multimorbidity increases care needs and primary care use among people with chronic diseases (1). The Concerto Health Program (CHP) has been developed to optimize chronic disease management in primary care services. However, in its current version, the CHP primarily targets clinicians and does not aim to respond directly to the needs of patients and their informal caregivers for chronic disease management . This project aims to develop, implement and evaluate a user-centered, multifunctional and personalized eHealth platform (CONCERTO+) to promote a more active patient role in chronic disease management and decision-making through three phases.
For phase1: A first prototype will be developed by the design and technology teams, in close collaboration with researchers, health professionals and patient representatives who will identify the functionalities to include in the CONCERTO+ solution.
The Phase 2 of the project will consist in a feasibility study based on a pilot cluster randomized clinical trial (c-RCT) where patients with chronic diseases from a primary healthcare practice will receive CONCERTO+ and be compared to patients from a control practice receiving usual care.
For Phase 3, the analysis of CONCERTO+ potential for scaling-up will be done by documenting factors and conditions associated with the sustainability and scaling-up of the solution. To do so, the investigators will conduct: 1) two focus groups with patients and informal caregivers who participated in the study (one with the experimental group and one with the control group, each group gathering between eight and twelve participants); 2) semi-structured individual interviews with health professionals at the two study sites, as well as with health care managers, information officers, and representatives of the Ministry of Health and Social Services.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Two Family Medicine Groups (FMG) from the same health region but covering distinct areas have been selected as the clusters. The FMGs will be randomily selected for the experimental (CONCERTO+) or control (usual care) group.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Concerto+ (Intervention group) | Experimental | Device: Concerto+Patients with two or more targeted chronic diseases (diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia) and who had three or more visits in the last 12 months will use Concerto+ application during 6 months. |
| Usual care (Control group) | No intervention | –Patients with two or more targeted chronic diseases (diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia) and who had three or more visits in the last 12 months will not use the application Concerto+ but receive usual care from FMG. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Having one or more targeted chronic diseases (diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia)
- had 3 or more visits in the last 12 months
- having an interest in health and technologies,
- be able to read and speak in French
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Majors whose incapacity has been recognised judically
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Concerto+a user-centered, multifunctional and personalized eHealth platform | Device | Concerto+ (Intervention group) |
Primary outcome
Patient Activation
Time frame: 6 months
The Patient Activation Measure -13 (2) is built on patient knowledge, skills and confidence that are directly targeted by the intervention and is associated to their activation level. Patients who are more activated have better health outcomes. Patients answer to a survey of 13 questions with the following scoring for each answer: Strongly disagree = 1; Disagree = 2; Agree = 3; strongly agree = 4 The score of the activation level obtained (between 0 and 100) shows the degree of ability to manage their health with confidence according to the following scale ranges: 1. Not believing that activation is important (≤ 47) 2. Lack of knowledge or confidence to take action (47.1 - 55.1) 3. Beginning to take action (55.2 - 67) 4. Taking action (≥ 67.1).
2 secondary outcomes
Process of care
Time frame: 9 months
Acceptability
Time frame: 9 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Aug 2018.
- Background: PubMed 21752267Fortin M, Contant E, Savard C, Hudon C, Poitras ME, Almirall J. Canadian guidelines for clinical practice: an analysis of their quality and relevance to the care of adults with comorbidity. BMC Fam Pract. 2011 Jul 13;12:74. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-12-74.
- Background: PubMed 16336556Hibbard JH, Mahoney ER, Stockard J, Tusler M. Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure. Health Serv Res. 2005 Dec;40(6 Pt 1):1918-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00438.x.
- Background: PubMed 15838407Glasgow RE, Wagner EH, Schaefer J, Mahoney LD, Reid RJ, Greene SM. Development and validation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC). Med Care. 2005 May;43(5):436-44. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000160375.47920.8c.
- BackgroundDavis, F.D., Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 1989: p. 319-340
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30944143Gagnon MP, Ndiaye MA, Larouche A, Chabot G, Chabot C, Buyl R, Fortin JP, Giguere A, Leblanc A, Legare F, Motulsky A, Sicotte C, Witteman HO, Kavanagh E, Lepinay F, Roberge J, Deletroz C, Abbasgholizadeh-Rahimi S. Optimising patient active role with a user-centred eHealth platform (CONCERTO+) in chronic diseases management: a study protocol for a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 2;9(4):e028554. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028554.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Chronic Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Phase I Open-Label Safety Trial of Pembrolizumab for Neurological Post- Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PD1-PASC I)
Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
Not yet recruitingObservational study
AI-Assisted Differentiation of Autoimmune Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Cancer Using EUS: A Multicenter Ambispective Study
Autoimmune Pancreatitis, Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC)
Active, not recruiting
Comparison of the Effects of Kinesio Taping and Interval Exercise in Patients Diagnosed With Venous Insufficiency: A Randomised Controlled Trial
Chronic Venous Insufficiency C2 and Below
RecruitingPhase 2
SARS-CoV-2 and Herpesvirus Inhibition for Ending Long COVID Dysfunction
Post-acute Sequelae of COVID-19, Long COVID
RecruitingPhase 2
PRA-216 COPD Safety and Biomarker Study
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Marie-Pierre Gagnon, Ph.D principal investigator
Faculty of Nursing, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Concerto+ in people with Chronic Disease, run by Laval University at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Aug 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Marie-Pierre Gagnon, Ph.D (418 525 4444 ext. 53169, marie-pierre.gagnon@fsi.ulaval.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patient Activation (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03628963, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Aug 2018.