SchizophreniaDAiPNCT03630822
Multicenter, Randomized, Comparative and Prospective Study Evaluating the Impact on the Care Path of an Editorial Program Accompanied by Advance Directives in Psychiatry (DAP) for People Suffering From Schizophrenia, Bipolar I Disorder or Schizoaffective Disorder
A study testing Psychiatric Advanced Directive in people with Schizophrenia and Bipolar I Disorder, run by Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Severe mental illness is accompanied by cognitive fluctuations that can alter decision-making skills and lead to coerced care. Taking into account, on the one hand, the health, social and economic impact of forced hospitalization, on the other hand the importance of self-determination, the reinforcement of the power… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Schizophrenia, Bipolar I Disorder
- What is being tested?
- Psychiatric Advanced Directive
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 399 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 2 Jan 2019to 2 Jan 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- over 18 years old;
- diagnosed with schizophrenia, bipolar I disorder, or schizoaffective disorder
- receiving ambulatory care by a treating psychiatrist, investigator
- having been hospitalized under duress at least once during the year preceding the inclusion
- being in decision-making jurisdiction
- can be under curator
- agreeing to participate in the study and with informed consent signed by the subject, as well as by the legal representative in the case of a person under guardianship.
Who cannot join
- less than 18 years old;
- participating in another study simultaneously
- in situations of decision-making incompetence
- not able to read and write
- refusing to participate in the study, or the legal representative refusing to participate in the study in the case of a person under guardianship.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Experimentation of a Protocol of Psychiatric Advance Directives: Randomized Controlled Multi-site Trial
Severe mental illness is accompanied by cognitive fluctuations that can alter decision-making skills and lead to coerced care. Taking into account, on the one hand, the health, social and economic impact of forced hospitalization, on the other hand the importance of self-determination, the reinforcement of the power to act in the evolution of these disorders, new strategies to better reflect the views of people have been developed.
Among these, the drafting of Advanced Directives in Psychiatric (ADP), allows people with mental disorders to write while their decision-making skills are restored care instructions in case of decompensation.
Read more
It is a tool of "advanced therapeutic education" and early prevention of relapses.
It is hypothesized that the implementation of drafting accompanied by advance directives to people with severe psychiatric disorders decreases in the short term the number of forced hospitalization care pathway of these people, compared to the subjects having not benefited from this device.
This research will take the form of a randomized controlled trial on 3 sites. The "quantitative" evaluation component of results and processes will be completed with a qualitative anthropological and socio-political evaluation component documenting the trajectories of individuals and the implementation of the program, as well as a "participatory research" component aimed at a dialogue between users, researchers and professionals.
The patient who is a beneficiary of the "Advanced Directives in Psychiatric" program will be encouraged to complete the " Advanced Directives in Psychiatric" document and will receive support in drafting them. The non-beneficiary patient of the program will follow up with his psychiatrist unchanged.
The experimental design of the quantitative component is based on an experimental, randomized, prospective, controlled, parallel study, comparing two groups of subjects with severe psychiatric disorders.
This research will assess the effectiveness, efficiency and impact of the " Advanced Directives in Psychiatric" program compared to conventional psychiatric care alone.
Ultimately, the objective of describing the effects of the program on health organizations and on the representations and practices of professionals, caregivers and users is at the service of a better understanding of the conditions of possibility of the generalization of this experimentation.
- Conditions
- Schizophrenia, Bipolar I Disorder
- Being tested
- Psychiatric Advanced Directive, Standard care
- Medical subject headings
- Schizophrenia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Psychiatric Advanced DirectiveBehavioural
The patient completes a questionnaire to express in advance his wishes regarding his future care in psychiatry.
Standard careBehavioural
standardized maintenance with the patient
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| beneficiary of the advance directive program | Experimental | Not described Receives: Behavioral: Psychiatric Advanced Directive |
| beneficiary of standard Support | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Behavioral: Standard care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Rate of patients with compulsory admission
Evaluation of the hospitalization rate by comparing the two groups
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (11)
Evaluation of patient recovery rates
The rate is assessed by the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS)
Measured: 12 months
Evaluation of the empowerment rate
The rate is assessed by the Empowerment Scale (ES)
Measured: 12 months
Measuring the health-related quality of life of patients
Health-related quality of life is measured using a specific scale: the S-QOL. It is a self-reported instrument of 41 items that assesses the quality of life in patients with schizophrenia
Measured: 12 months
Measuring mental health symptoms of patients
Mental health symptoms are measured by Modified Colorado Symptom Index (MCSI)
Measured: 12 months
Evaluation of the therapeutic alliance between the patient and his psychiatrist
The therapeutic alliance between the patient and his psychiatrist is assessed by the 4-Point Alliance Self Report (4-PAS) questionnaire
Measured: 12 months
Measuring Disease Awareness
Disease Awareness is assessed by the évaluée par l'échelle SUMD (Scale to Assess Unawareness in Mental Disorder
Measured: 12 months
Evaluation of the severity of the psychiatric disorder by the psychiatrist
The severity of the psychiatric disorder is assessed by the Clinical Global Impression (ICG) scale
Measured: 12 months
Medico-economic analysis (cost-utility)
Number of inpatient
Measured: 12 months
Medico-economic analysis (cost-utility)
Number of emergency department visits
Measured: 12 months
Medico-economic analysis (cost-utility)
Number of outpatient visits
Measured: 12 months
Medico-economic analysis (cost-utility)
Loss of productivity
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Aug 2018
- Study start2 Jan 2019
- Primary completion10 May 2021
- Study completion2 Jan 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for SchizophreniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 399 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jean-Olivier ARNAUD, Director, Study director, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03630822
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2018-04
- Other IDs
- 2018-A00146-49
- Acronym
- DAiP
- Status last verified
- Mar 2022
- First submitted
- 10 Aug 2018
- Last updated
- 31 Mar 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Desvignes S, Boucekine M, Loubiere S, Leclerc L, Auquier P, Tinland A. Validation of a French version of the empowerment scale for mental health service users. BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 6;25(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06554-4.
PubMed 40050829Tinland A, Loubiere S, Mougeot F, Jouet E, Pontier M, Baumstarck K, Loundou A, Franck N, Lancon C, Auquier P; DAiP Group. Effect of Psychiatric Advance Directives Facilitated by Peer Workers on Compulsory Admission Among People With Mental Illness: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 1;79(8):752-759. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.1627.
PubMed 35662314Tinland A, Leclerc L, Loubiere S, Mougeot F, Greacen T, Pontier M, Franck N, Lancon C, Boucekine M, Auquier P. Psychiatric advance directives for people living with schizophrenia, bipolar I disorders, or schizoaffective disorders: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial - DAiP study. BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Dec 27;19(1):422. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2416-9.
PubMed 31881954
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Mar 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Experimentation of a Protocol of Psychiatric Advance Directives: Randomized Controlled Multi-site Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03630822
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DAiP / 2018-04
- Conditions
- Schizophrenia, Bipolar I Disorder
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 399 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique Hopitaux De MarseilleUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 2 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 May 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 2 Jan 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Severe mental illness is accompanied by cognitive fluctuations that can alter decision-making skills and lead to coerced care. Taking into account, on the one hand, the health, social and economic impact of forced hospitalization, on the other hand the importance of self-determination, the reinforcement of the power to act in the evolution of these disorders, new strategies to better reflect the views of people have been developed.
Among these, the drafting of Advanced Directives in Psychiatric (ADP), allows people with mental disorders to write while their decision-making skills are restored care instructions in case of decompensation.
It is a tool of "advanced therapeutic education" and early prevention of relapses.
It is hypothesized that the implementation of drafting accompanied by advance directives to people with severe psychiatric disorders decreases in the short term the number of forced hospitalization care pathway of these people, compared to the subjects having not benefited from this device.
This research will take the form of a randomized controlled trial on 3 sites. The "quantitative" evaluation component of results and processes will be completed with a qualitative anthropological and socio-political evaluation component documenting the trajectories of individuals and the implementation of the program, as well as a "participatory research" component aimed at a dialogue between users, researchers and professionals.
The patient who is a beneficiary of the "Advanced Directives in Psychiatric" program will be encouraged to complete the " Advanced Directives in Psychiatric" document and will receive support in drafting them. The non-beneficiary patient of the program will follow up with his psychiatrist unchanged.
The experimental design of the quantitative component is based on an experimental, randomized, prospective, controlled, parallel study, comparing two groups of subjects with severe psychiatric disorders.
This research will assess the effectiveness, efficiency and impact of the " Advanced Directives in Psychiatric" program compared to conventional psychiatric care alone.
Ultimately, the objective of describing the effects of the program on health organizations and on the representations and practices of professionals, caregivers and users is at the service of a better understanding of the conditions of possibility of the generalization of this experimentation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| beneficiary of the advance directive program | Experimental | Behavioral: Psychiatric Advanced Directive |
| beneficiary of standard Support | Active comparator | Behavioral: Standard care |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- over 18 years old;
- diagnosed with schizophrenia, bipolar I disorder, or schizoaffective disorder
- receiving ambulatory care by a treating psychiatrist, investigator
- having been hospitalized under duress at least once during the year preceding the inclusion
- being in decision-making jurisdiction
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- less than 18 years old;
- participating in another study simultaneously
- in situations of decision-making incompetence
- not able to read and write
- refusing to participate in the study, or the legal representative refusing to participate in the study in the case of a person under guardianship.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Psychiatric Advanced DirectiveThe patient completes a questionnaire to express in advance his wishes regarding his future care in psychiatry. | Behavioural | beneficiary of the advance directive program |
| Standard carestandardized maintenance with the patient | Behavioural | beneficiary of standard Support |
Primary outcome
Rate of patients with compulsory admission
Time frame: 12 months
Evaluation of the hospitalization rate by comparing the two groups
11 secondary outcomes
Evaluation of patient recovery rates
Time frame: 12 months
Evaluation of the empowerment rate
Time frame: 12 months
Measuring the health-related quality of life of patients
Time frame: 12 months
Measuring mental health symptoms of patients
Time frame: 12 months
Evaluation of the therapeutic alliance between the patient and his psychiatrist
Time frame: 12 months
Measuring Disease Awareness
Time frame: 12 months
Evaluation of the severity of the psychiatric disorder by the psychiatrist
Time frame: 12 months
Medico-economic analysis (cost-utility)
Time frame: 12 months
Medico-economic analysis (cost-utility)
Time frame: 12 months
Medico-economic analysis (cost-utility)
Time frame: 12 months
Medico-economic analysis (cost-utility)
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Mar 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40050829Desvignes S, Boucekine M, Loubiere S, Leclerc L, Auquier P, Tinland A. Validation of a French version of the empowerment scale for mental health service users. BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 6;25(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06554-4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35662314Tinland A, Loubiere S, Mougeot F, Jouet E, Pontier M, Baumstarck K, Loundou A, Franck N, Lancon C, Auquier P; DAiP Group. Effect of Psychiatric Advance Directives Facilitated by Peer Workers on Compulsory Admission Among People With Mental Illness: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 1;79(8):752-759. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.1627.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31881954Tinland A, Leclerc L, Loubiere S, Mougeot F, Greacen T, Pontier M, Franck N, Lancon C, Boucekine M, Auquier P. Psychiatric advance directives for people living with schizophrenia, bipolar I disorders, or schizoaffective disorders: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial - DAiP study. BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Dec 27;19(1):422. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2416-9.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Schizophrenia
Not yet recruiting
Reducing Stigma - A Treatment for Early Psychosis to Prevent Suicide
Suicide, Mental Health Stigma
Recruiting
Theta-Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Auditory Hallucinations
Auditory Verbal Hallucinations, Schizophrenia
Recruiting
A Relation Between Craving Induction and Treatment Response in Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (dTMS) for Reducing Antipsychotic-induced Weight Gain in Schizophrenia
Schizophrenia, Antipsychotic Induced Weight Gain
Recruiting
Cognitive Neurocomputational Task Reliability and Clinical Applications Consortium: Study 3
Schizophrenia / Schizoaffective Disorder, SCHIZOPHRENIA 1 (Disorder)
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of the Feasibility, Safety and Tolerability of Aticaprant as Adjunctive Treatment in Participants With Schizophrenia
Schizophrenia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jean-Olivier ARNAUD, Director study director
Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Psychiatric Advanced Directive in people with Schizophrenia and Bipolar I Disorder, run by Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Rate of patients with compulsory admission (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03630822, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Mar 2022.