HIV InfectionsPhase 3NCT03635788
The LATITUDE Study: Long-Acting Therapy to Improve Treatment SUccess in Daily LifE
A Phase 3 study testing Oral RPV, Oral CAB and RPV-LA Loading Dose in people with HIV Infections, run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at 33 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy, safety, and durability of two different strategies to treat participants with a history of sub-optimal adherence and control of their HIV infection: long-acting (LA) antiretroviral therapy (ART) and all-oral standard of care (SOC). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV Infections
- What is being tested?
- Oral RPV, Oral CAB and RPV-LA Loading Dose
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 456 participants
- Where
- 33 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 28 Mar 2019to 17 Aug 2026
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Step 1 Inclusion Criteria
HIV-1 infection, documented by any licensed rapid HIV test or HIV enzyme or chemiluminescence immunoassay (E/CIA) test kit at any time prior to study entry and confirmed by a licensed Western blot or a second antibody test by a method other than the initial rapid HIV and/or E/CIA, or by HIV-1 antigen, plasma HIV-1 RNA viral load.
NOTE: The term "licensed" referred to an FDA-approved kit, which was required for all IND studies.
WHO (World Health Organization) and CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) guidelines mandated that confirmation of the initial test result had to use a test that was different from the one used for the initial assessment. A reactive initial rapid test had to be confirmed by either another type of rapid assay or an E/CIA that was based on a different antigen preparation and/or different test principle (e.g., indirect versus competitive), or a Western blot or a plasma HIV-1 RNA viral load.
HIV-1 Plasma viral load (VL) greater than 200 copies/mL within 12 months prior to study entry by any US laboratory that had a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) certification or its equivalent, unless the participant had been lost to clinical follow-up (see protocol for more information) and no viral load result was available within the last 12 months.
NOTE: Participants who satisfied non-adherence eligibility due to loss to clinical follow-up might not have had a viral load result available at the time of consideration for eligibility. Those participants could be screened and, regardless of their screening viral load result (either ≤ or >200 copies/mL), they would have been eligible for study entry if they met all other inclusion/exclusion criteria.
Evidence of non-adherence to ART according to at least one of the following criteria:
Poor virologic response within 18 months prior to study entry (defined as less than 1 log10 decrease in HIV-1 RNA or HIV-1 RNA greater than 200 copies/mL at two time points at least 4 weeks apart) in individuals who had been prescribed ART for at least 6 consecutive months.
Lost to clinical follow-up within 18 months prior to study entry with ART non-adherence for greater than or equal to 6 consecutive months.
NOTE: Lost to clinical follow-up was defined as either no contact with the provider or missing greater than or equal to 1 appointment in a 6-month period. ART non-adherence was defined as a lapse in ART greater than or equal to 7 days (consecutive or non-consecutive), in the 6-month period where they were lost to clinical follow-up per participant report.
No evidence of any clinically relevant RPV or INSTI resistance-associated mutations (see protocol for more information) through commercially available genotypic (or phenotypic, if available) analyses from any laboratory that had a CLIA certification or equivalent within 60 days of study entry (see protocol for more information), nor history of such mutations on review of prior HIV-1 drug resistance tests by the site investigator. For participants in whom a screening HIV-1 conventional genotype could not be resulted by the testing laboratory, review of historical genotypes and treatment history by the IoR could be used to satisfy this criterion as indicated in the protocol.
Ability of site clinician, in conjunction with the participant, to construct an oral induction antiretroviral (ARV) regimen that had to include at least three ARVs of which at least two had to be predicted to be fully active. The regimen had to include PI/cobi and/or an INSTI based on screening and/or historic resistance testing.
Laboratory values obtained within 60 days prior to study entry by any laboratory that had a CLIA certification or its equivalent:
Hemoglobin greater than or equal to 9.0 g/dL
Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than or equal to 600/mm^3
Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) less than or equal to 3 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
Creatinine Clearance (CrCl) greater than or equal to 50 mL/min estimated by Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-Epi).
For participants of reproductive potential, a negative serum or urine pregnancy test with a sensitivity of less than or equal to 25 mIU/mL at screening. This was repeated again at study entry.
NOTE: Participants were considered to be NOT of reproductive potential if: 1) they had had amenorrhea for at least 12 consecutive months prior to study entry (i.e., who had had no menses within 12 months prior to study entry), and had a documented follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) greater than 40 IU/mL; OR 2) an FSH level was not available, but they had had 24 consecutive months of amenorrhea (in the absence of medications known to induce amenorrhea); OR 3) they reported having undergone surgical sterilization (e.g., hysterectomy, or bilateral oophorectomy, or bilateral tubal ligation/hysteroscopic tubal occlusion).
Contraception Requirements
Participants of Reproductive Potential: Participants of reproductive potential, who were participating in sexual activity that could lead to pregnancy, had to agree to use at least one of the listed highly effective methods for contraception from 30 days prior to the first dose of study medication, while receiving the study drugs, and for 30 days after stopping oral medications, or the duration specified in the product label if receiving study drugs not supplied by the study, or 52 weeks after stopping RPV-LA or CAB-LA. Acceptable methods of contraception included:
Contraceptive subdermal implant
Intrauterine device or intrauterine system
Combined estrogen and progestogen oral contraceptive
Injectable progestogen
Contraceptive vaginal ring
Percutaneous contraceptive patches
Participants Who Were Not of Reproductive Potential: Participants who were not of reproductive potential were eligible to start study drugs without requiring the use of contraceptives. Any statement of self-reported sterility or that of her partner's had to be entered in the source documents.
NOTE A: Acceptable documentation of lack of reproductive potential was the participant's self-reported history of surgical sterilization, menopause, or male partner's azoospermia.
NOTE B: ALL participants in the study were to be counseled on safer sexual practices including the use and benefit/risk of effective barrier methods (e.g., male condom) and on the risk of HIV transmission to a partner without HIV.
Ability and willingness of participant or legal guardian/representative to provide written informed consent.
Step 1 Exclusion Criteria
Currently pregnant, planning to become pregnant during the study period, or currently breastfeeding.
Participants determined by the Site Investigator to have had a high risk of seizures, including participants with an unstable or poorly controlled seizure disorder.
NOTE: A participant with a prior history of seizure could have been considered for enrollment if the Investigator believed the risk of seizure recurrence was low. All cases of prior seizure history were to be discussed with the A5359 protocol leadership team (actg.leada5359@fstrf.org) prior to enrollment.
Advanced liver disease (as defined by any of the following: presence of ascites, encephalopathy, coagulopathy, hypoalbuminemia, esophageal or gastric varices, or persistent jaundice), known biliary abnormalities (with the exception of Gilbert's syndrome or asymptomatic gallstones) OR history of liver cirrhosis.
Chronic Hepatitis C (HCV) with planned or anticipated use of anti-HCV therapy prior to the completion of Step 2.
History of or current active hepatitis B (HBV) infection defined as a positive HBV surface antigen test or any detectable HBV DNA in participants with isolated HBcAb and HBV DNA as follows:
Participants positive for HBsAg were excluded.
Participants negative for anti-HBs but positive for anti-HBc (negative HBsAg status) and any detectable HBV DNA were excluded.
NOTE: Participants positive for anti-HBc (negative HBsAg status) and positive for anti-HBs (past and/or current evidence) were immune to HBV and were not excluded. If prior documentation of immunity was available, repeat testing at screening was not required.
Current or anticipated need for chronic anti-coagulation therapy.
Unwilling to receive injections, or unable to receive gluteal injections.
Tattoo or other condition over the gluteus region, which could have interfered with the interpretation of injection site reaction.
Previous use of CAB.
Any acute or serious illness, within 7 days prior to entry, requiring systemic treatment and/or hospitalization that could have rendered the participant unable to receive study medication, in the opinion of the site investigator.
QTc greater than 450 ms using either Bazett or Fridericia method within 60 days prior to study entry: Whichever method was used at screening had to be used throughout the study period.
Any serious medical or psychiatric condition, which could have rendered the participant unable to receive study medication in the opinion of the site investigator.
Known allergy/sensitivity or any hypersensitivity to components of study drug(s) or their formulation.
Requirement for any medication that was prohibited with a study medication (refer to protocol-specific web page [PSWP]).
Step 2 Inclusion Criteria
Meeting virologic suppression criteria at or after Step 1, week 4, defined as:
- HIV-1 RNA ≤200 copies/mL OR
- HIV-1 RNA of 201-399 copies/mL followed by HIV-1 RNA ≤200 copies/mL by Step 1, week 24.
NOTE: The HIV-1 RNA viral load that was used to determine eligibility for randomization had to have been collected within 4 weeks (28 days) of the Step 2 randomization visit.
Step 2 Exclusion Criteria
Permanent discontinuation of study treatment for any reason during Step 1.
Participants who never started study treatment in Step 1 (see protocol for more information).
Step 3 Inclusion Criteria, Participants Registering from Step 1
Virologic suppression at or after Step 1, week 4, defined as:
- HIV-1 RNA ≤200 copies/mL OR
- HIV-1 RNA of 201-399 copies/mL followed by HIV-1 RNA ≤200 copies/mL by Step 1, week 24.
NOTE: The HIV-1 RNA viral load that was used to determine eligibility for Step 3 had to have been collected within 4 weeks (28 days) of the Step 3 registration visit.
Willingness to begin to receive LA ART.
Step 3 Exclusion Criteria, Participants Registering from Step 1
Permanent discontinuation of study treatment for any reason during Step 1.
Participants who never started study treatment in Step 1 (see protocol for more information).
Currently pregnant, planning to become pregnant during the study period, or currently breastfeeding.
Step 3 Inclusion Criteria, Participants Registering from Step 2
Willingness to continue LA ART (for those in Step 2 Arm A) or begin LA ART (for those in Step 2 Arm B).
Step 2 Arm B participants: HIV-1 RNA ≤200 copies/mL at the most recent Step 2 visit OR Confirmation of Virologic Failure visit.
NOTE: The HIV-1 RNA viral load that was used to determine eligibility for Step 3 had to have been collected within 4 weeks (28 days) of the Step 3 registration visit.
Step 3 Exclusion Criteria, Participants Registering from Step 2
Permanent discontinuation of study treatment (LA ART for Arm A and oral ART for Arm B) for any reason during Step 2.
Confirmed Virologic Failure during Step 2.
Step 2 Arm B Participants: Currently pregnant, planning to become pregnant during the study period, or currently breastfeeding.
NOTE: Step 2 Arm A participants who became pregnant and were permitted to continue on LA-ART could continue on that regimen in Step 3.
Step 4 Inclusion Criteria
Any participant who had received at least one dose of CAB-LA or RPV-LA AND did not have access to available LA ART through their provider, OR did not wish to continue LA ART.
Step 4 Exclusion Criteria
There were no exclusion criteria for Step 4.
Trial locations and contacts
33 sites in 2 countries.
33 sites in 2 countries
United States32 sites
The Ponce de Leon Center CRS
Atlanta, Georgia, 30308-2012
University of Colorado Hospital CRS
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Johns Hopkins University CRS
Baltimore, Maryland, 21205
Alabama CRS
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Massachusetts General Hospital CRS (MGH CRS)
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Brigham and Women's Hospital Therapeutics Clinical Research Site (BWH TCRS) CRS
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Chapel Hill CRS
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
Northwestern University CRS
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Rush University CRS
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Cincinnati Clinical Research Site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
Case Clinical Research Site
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
Ohio State University CRS
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Greensboro CRS
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27401
Houston AIDS Research Team CRS
Houston, Texas, 77030
Univ. of Florida Jacksonville NICHD CRS
Jacksonville, Florida, 32209
University of Southern California CRS
Los Angeles, California, 90033-1079
UCLA CARE Center CRS
Los Angeles, California, 90035
Vanderbilt Therapeutics (VT) CRS
Nashville, Tennessee, 37204
Weill Cornell Chelsea CRS
New York, New York, 10010
Columbia P&S CRS
New York, New York, 10032-3732
Weill Cornell Uptown CRS
New York, New York, 10065
New Jersey Medical School Clinical Research Center CRS
Newark, New Jersey, 07103
Penn Therapeutics, CRS
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
University of Pittsburgh CRS
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
The Miriam Hospital Clinical Research Site (TMH CRS) CRS
Providence, Rhode Island, 02906
UCSD Antiviral Research Center CRS
San Diego, California, 92103
Ucsf Hiv/Aids Crs
San Francisco, California, 94110
University of Washington AIDS CRS
Seattle, Washington, 98104-9929
Washington University Therapeutics (WT) CRS
St Louis, Missouri, 63110-1010
SUNY Stony Brook NICHD CRS
Stony Brook, New York, 11794
Jacobi Med. Ctr. Bronx NICHD CRS
The Bronx, New York, 10461
Harbor-UCLA CRS
Torrance, California, 90502
Puerto Rico1 site
Puerto Rico AIDS Clinical Trials Unit CRS
San Juan, 00935
About this study
Official title: A Phase III Study to Evaluate Long-Acting Antiretroviral Therapy in Non-Adherent HIV-Infected Individuals
The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy, safety, and durability of two different strategies to treat participants with a history of sub-optimal adherence and control of their HIV infection: long-acting (LA) antiretroviral therapy (ART) and all-oral standard of care (SOC).
Read the detailed description
This study compared the efficacy, safety, and durability of two different strategies to treat participants with a history of sub-optimal adherence and control of their HIV infection: long-acting (LA) antiretroviral therapy (ART) with rilpivirine (RPV) LA and cabotegravir (CAB) LA versus all-oral standard of care (SOC).
As the study was originally designed, the study included four steps.
Step 1, Induction
Previously non-adherent individuals were enrolled and underwent a period (up to 24 weeks) of induction SOC ART regimen using conditional economic incentives (CEI). Participants who achieved virologic suppression criteria at or after Step 1, week 4, defined as: a) HIV-1 RNA ≤200 copies/mL or b) HIV-1 RNA of 201-399 copies/mL followed by HIV-1 RNA ≤200 copies/mL by Step 1, week 24, were eligible to enter Step 2.
Step 2, Randomization
Eligible participants were randomized at Step 2 entry in a 1:1 ratio to either of the two treatment arms:
Arm A (LA ART): A combination of oral RPV + oral CAB for 4 weeks (optional) followed by the LA ART Phase, consisting of a two-drug regimen using RPV-LA + CAB-LA Q4 weeks until the end of Step 2 (Table 5.2.1-2). The option to initiate LA ART at the Step 2 Randomization visit without oral RPV + oral CAB was at the discretion of the site investigator of Record (IoR) and participant (see section 2.1, Direct-to-Inject).
Arm B (SOC): Continuation of the SOC for 52 weeks.
Step 3, Continuation/Crossover
Arm A participants continued on RPV-LA + CAB-LA Q4 weeks for 52 weeks until the end of Step 3. Arm B participants (continuation of SOC) who achieved virologic suppression (HIV-1 RNA ≤200 copies/mL) at Step 2, week 48, or HIV-1 RNA of 201-399 copies/mL at Step 2, week 48, followed by HIV-1 RNA ≤200 copies/mL by Step 2, week 52, had the option to cross over at the end of Step 2 to oral RPV + oral CAB for 4 weeks (optional) followed by RPV-LA + CAB-LA every 4 weeks until the end of Step 3 (Table 5.2.1-3). Arm B participants who did not wish or were not eligible to cross over completed study follow-up at Step 2, week 52.
If RPV-LA + CAB-LA became available before a participant finished Step 3, and the participant chose to continue RPV-LA + CAB-LA as part of their clinical care, their follow-up in the study ended at the completion of Step 3. If for some reason the participant chose not to continue LA ART at the end of Step 3 or if LA ART was not available, the participant registered to Step 4 and was followed on locally sourced oral ARV for 52 weeks.
Step 4, Observation
Participants who registered to Step 4 were followed for up to 52 weeks on oral ART. In addition, any participant who received at least one dose of CAB-LA or RPV-LA at any step, and prematurely discontinued the LA ART prior to the end of Step 3, completed their respective Step (either Step 2 or 3) on study/off study treatment, and registered to Step 4 and were followed to complete 52 weeks total on oral ART after their last dose of any LA injectable.
If LA ART became available during follow-up in Step 4, and the participant and provider decided to restart LA ART, they were allowed to do so. In that case, the participants were not followed by the study after restarting LA ART.
On February 12, 2024, based on the interim efficacy results, Data Safety and Monitoring Board (DSMB) recommended stopping randomization to Step 2 and transitioning all eligible participants in Steps 1 and 2 to LA-ART. Per recommendations from DSMB, randomization into Step 2 stopped on February 16, 2024, leaving three steps in the current study protocol 4.0:
In Step 1, participants will receive a SOC oral induction regimen consisting of an ART regimen that involves at least 3 drugs for 24 weeks. Participants who achieve milestones will receive conditional economic incentives. With randomization into Step 2 ended, all eligible Step 1 participants will register to Step 3 at the completion of Step 1.
Participants who are currently on Step 2:
Eligible participants in Step 2 Arm A (already on RPV-LA + CAB-LA) will register to Step 3 and continue on this regimen until the end of Step 3 (52 weeks; See protocol for more information). This should happen at the next scheduled study visit after approval of Version 4.0.
Eligible participants in Step 2 Arm B (SOC arm) will register to Step 3 and switch to oral RPV + oral CAB for 4 weeks (optional; see protocol for more information) followed by RPV-LA + CAB-LA Q4 weeks until the end of Step 3 (52 weeks). This should happen at the next scheduled study visit after approval of Version 4.0.
Eligible participants will enter Step 4 and be followed up to 52 weeks on locally sourced oral ART.
Participants will be followed for up to a total of 180 weeks. Study visits, which will occur throughout the study, may include physical examinations; blood, urine, and hair collection; liver function tests; questionnaires; and an electrocardiogram (ECG).
NOTE: Data summarized in the primary analysis report were based on evaluations undertaken at visits conducted prior to the implementation of Protocol v4.0 which incorporated February 12, 2024 DSMB recommendations. Primary analyses were outlined in the A5359 primary Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) version 6.0 (dated August 5, 2024) focusing on follow-up in Step 1 and Step 2.
- Conditions
- HIV Infections
- Being tested
- Standard of Care (SOC) Oral ART, Oral RPV, Oral CAB, RPV-LA Loading Dose, CAB-LA Loading Dose
- Medical subject headings
- HIV Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Standard of Care (SOC) Oral ARTDrug
SOC oral ART regimen must include at least 3 drugs with 2 or more drugs predicted to be fully active, including a boosted protease inhibitor (PI) and/or an integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)
Oral RPVDrug
Also called Rilpivirine
RPV 25 mg tablets
Oral CABDrug
Also called Cabotegravir, GSK1265744
CAB 30 mg tablets
RPV-LA Loading DoseDrug
Also called Rilpivirine Long-Acting Injectable
900 mg administered as one 3 mL (900 mg) intramuscular injection in the gluteal muscle
CAB-LA Loading DoseDrug
Also called Cabotegravir Long-Acting Injectable
600 mg administered as one 3 mL (600 mg) intramuscular injection in the gluteal muscle
RPV-LA Maintenance DoseDrug
Also called Rilpivirine Long-Acting Injectable
600 mg administered as one 2 mL (600 mg) intramuscular injection in the gluteal muscle
CAB-LA Maintenance DoseDrug
Also called Cabotegravir Long-Acting Injectable
400 mg administered as one 2 mL (400 mg) intramuscular injection in the gluteal muscle
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Step 1 SOC | Other | In Step 1, participants received SOC oral ART regimen for up to 24 weeks. Receives: Drug: Standard of Care (SOC) Oral ART |
| Step 2 Arm A: LA ART | Experimental | In Step 2, participants received oral RPV once daily and oral CAB once daily for 4 weeks (optional), followed by a RPV-LA loading dose and a CAB-LA loading dose, followed in 4 weeks by an RPV-LA maintenance dose and a CAB-LA maintenance dose every 4 weeks for 44 weeks. Receives: Drug: Oral RPV; Drug: Oral CAB; Drug: RPV-LA Loading Dose; Drug: CAB-LA Loading Dose; Drug: RPV-LA Maintenance Dose; Drug: CAB-LA Maintenance Dose |
| Step 2 Arm B: SOC | Active comparator | In Step 2, participants continued SOC oral ART regimen for 52 weeks. Receives: Drug: Standard of Care (SOC) Oral ART |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cumulative Probability of Regimen Failure in Step 2 at Any Time Post Randomization and Week 48 Visit
Regimen failure was defined as the occurrence of the earlier of the following two events
- virologic failure (defined as two consecutive HIV-1 RNA >200 copies/mL after Step 2 randomization
- Permanent discontinuation of randomized study treatment prior to or at Week 48 visit
Cumulative probability was calculated by Kaplan-Meier method.
Measured: From Step 2 randomization to Step 2, Week 48 visit (up to 50 weeks)
Secondary outcomes (19)
Cumulative Probability of Virologic Failure in Step 2 at Any Time Post Randomization to Week 48 Visit
Virologic failure was defined as two consecutive HIV-1 RNA >200 copies/mL after Step 2 randomization and up to Step 2 Week 48 visit, regardless of the time between them.
Cumulative probability was calculated by Kaplan-Meier method.
Measured: From Step 2 randomization to Step 2, Week 48 visit (up to 50 weeks)
Cumulative Probability of the Treatment-related Failure in Step 2 at Any Time Post Randomization to Week 48 Visit
Treatment-related failure was defined as the occurrence of the earlier of virologic failure or permanent Step 2 treatment discontinuation due to treatment-related adverse events.
Cumulative probability was calculated by Kaplan-Meier method.
Measured: From after Step 2 randomization to Step 2, Week 48 (up to 50 weeks)
Number of Participants With Virologic Non-success (>= 50 Copies/ml)
Virologic non-success was defined by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Snapshot algorithm
Measured: from Step 2 randomization to Step 2, Week 48 (up to 50 weeks)
Number of Participants With Virologic Non-success (>= 200 Copies/ml)
Virologic non-success was defined by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Snapshot algorithm
Measured: From Step 2 randomization to Step 2, Week 48 (up to 50 weeks)
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Level Less Than 50 Copies/mL at Scheduled Study Visits on Steps 1
Summarized the percentage of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA level less than 50 copies/mL by study visit
Measured: Measured from Step 1 entry through Step 1, Week 20 visit
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Level Less Than 200 Copies/mL at Scheduled Study Visits on Steps 1
Summarized the percentage of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA level less than 200 copies/mL by study visit
Measured: Measured from Step 1 entry through Step 1, Week 20 visit
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Level Less Than 50 Copies/mL at Scheduled Study Visits on Steps 2
Summarized the percentage of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA level less than 50 copies/mL by study visit, and randomized treatment.
Measured: Measured from Step 2 entry through Step 2, Week 48 visit
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Level Less Than 200 Copies/mL at Scheduled Study Visits on Steps 2
Summarized the percentage of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA level less than 200 copies/mL by study visit, and randomized treatment.
Measured: Measured from Step 2 entry through Step 2, Week 48 visit
Cumulative Probability of Discontinuation of Randomized Treatment in Step 2
Permanent Step 2 treatment discontinuation was defined as premature discontinuation of randomized study treatment.
Cumulative probability was calculated by Kaplan-Meier method.
Measured: Measured from Step 2 randomization through Step 2, Week 48 (up to 50 weeks)
Median Summary Score of HIV Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (HIVTSQ) in Step 2
The questionnaire had 12 items rated using a 7-point Likert scale. Results were summarized as a total score that included 11 items, with the "pain/discomfort" item reported separately.
- The HIVTSQ "status" measured participant satisfaction with their current treatment with individual item rated ranging from 0 ("very dissatisfied") to 6 ("very satisfied") and the total score ranging from 0 to 66, where higher scores indicated a greater level of satisfaction with their HIV-1 treatment.
- The HIVTSQ "change" measured change in treatment satisfaction between a participant's previous and current treatment. The individual items were rated from -3 ("much less satisfied") to 3 ("much more satisfied") with a total score ranging from -33 to 33.
Measured: HIVTSQ status was collected on both arms at Step 2 entry and Week 24, and also at Week 48 for those randomized to SOC. At Week 48, HIVTSQ change was collected for participants on the LA-ART arm.
Number of Participants With Missed or Delayed Injections for Participants Who Received LA ART in Step 2
Delayed injection was defined as 36-56 days from the previous injection. Missed injection was defined as the duration from the previous injection was longer than 56 days.
Measured: Measured from Step 2 randomization through Step 2, Week 52
Median of Summary Scores of HIV Treatment Adherence Self-Efficacy Scale in Step 1
HIV Treatment Adherence Self-Efficacy Scale was a 12-item measure used to measure social and psychological determinants of adherence to ART among individuals living with HIV. The response scale to each individual item ranged from 0 ("cannot do at all") to 10 ("completely certain can do"). The total score reported was the average of all item scores, ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating higher adherence self-efficacy.
Measured: Step 1 entry, Weeks 12 and 20.
Median of Summary Scores of HIV Treatment Adherence Self-Efficacy Scale in Step 2
HIV Treatment Adherence Self-Efficacy Scale was a 12-item measure used to measure social and psychological determinants of adherence to ART among individuals living with HIV. The response scale to each individual item ranged from 0 ("cannot do at all") to 10 ("completely certain can do"). The total score reported was the average of all item scores, ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating higher adherence self-efficacy.
Measured: As Step 2 Week 0, Week 24 and Week 48
Number of Participants With New Drug-resistance Mutations in Participants With Virologic Failure in Step 2
Samples for HIV-1 resistance testing were collected at virologic failure confirmation visit. HIV-1 drug resistance mutations were determined using the IAS October/November 2022 Update of the Drug Resistance Mutations in HIV-1. New drug resistance mutations were defined as those detected at or after virologic failure which were not present at Step 1 screening/baseline.
Virologic failure defined as two consecutive HIV-1 RNA > 200 copies/mL after Step 2 randomization, regardless of the time between them.
Measured: Measured at Step 1 screening/entry and at the time of virologic failure in Step 2
Percentage of Participants With Grade 1 or Higher Injection Site Reactions (ISR) During Step 2
Summarized and tabulated by number of participants with at least 1 injection site reactions.
Severity Grade: 1 = Mild, 2 = Moderate, 3 = Severe, 4 = Life-Threatening, 5 = Death
Measured: Measured from Step 2 randomization through Step 2, Week 52
Percentage of Participants Who Preferred Monthly Injections of Long-Acting HIV Treatment or Daily Oral HIV Treatment at Each Visit
The Dichotomous Preference Questionnaire were:
- Monthly injections of Long-Acting HIV Treatment
- Daily oral HIV
Measured: Step 2 week 48, premature treatment visit, and study discontinuation visit
Percentage of Participants With Opinions About Conditional Economic Incentive (CEI) Withdrawal
The responses included: Not at all upset or disappointed, Not very upset or disappointed, Somewhat upset or disappointed, Extremely upset or disappointed, Undecided
Measured: At Step 2 entry and Step 2, Week 8
Median of Average Total Score of Step 1 HIV Treatment Adherence Self-Efficacy Scale Score (HIV-ASES)
HIV-ASES was a 12-item measure used to measure social and psychological determinants of adherence to ART among individuals living with HIV. The response scale to each individual item ranged from 0 ("cannot do at all") to 10 ("completely certain can do"). The total score reported was the average of all item scores, ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating higher adherence self-efficacy.
Measured: Step 1 entry, Step 1 Weeks 12, and Step 1 Weeks 20
Percentage of Participants With Missed Treatment Doses Among Participants Who Randomized to SOC Arm in Step 2
The outcome was defined as participants with at least one dose missed in the last 30 days at each visit
Measured: At Step 2 entry, Step 2 week 4, Step 2 week 8, step 2 week 16, step 2 week 24, step 2 week 36, Step 2 week 48, and Step 2 week 52
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Aug 2018
- Study start28 Mar 2019
- Primary completion12 Feb 2024
- Study completion17 Aug 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HIV InfectionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 456 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- US National Institutes of Health
- Collaborators
- ViiV Healthcare
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Aadia Rana, M.D., Study chair, Alabama CTU
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03635788
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ACTG A5359
- Other IDs
- 30104
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 15 Aug 2018
- Last updated
- 17 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Individual participant data that underlie results in the publication, after deidentification.
Publications
Rana AI, Zheng L, Castillo-Mancilla J, Bao Y, Sieczkarski S, Brooks KM, Lake JE, Fichtenbaum C, Heath SL, Belaunzaran-Zamudio PF, Klingman K, Fox L, Morton T, Stirratt M, Li JZ, Acosta EP, Venuto C, Galarraga O, Shoptaw S, Wohl D, Green M, Beijer C, Ferbas K, Jennings C, Shin K, Collahua R, Dorosh M, Wannamaker P, D'Amico R, Smith K, Spreen W, Vandermeulen K, Van Solingen-Ristea R, Wimbish C, Tashima KT, Landovitz RJ; ACTG A5359 LATITUDE Trial Team. Cabotegravir plus Rilpivirine for Persons with HIV and Adherence Challenges. N Engl J Med. 2026 Feb 26;394(9):858-871. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2508228. Epub 2026 Feb 18.
PubMed 41707171Okesanya OJ, Ayeni RA, Amadin P, Ngwoke I, Amisu BO, Ukoaka BM, Ahmed MM, Oso TA, Musa SS, Lucero-Prisno DE. Advances in HIV Treatment and Vaccine Development: Emerging Therapies and Breakthrough Strategies for Long-Term Control. AIDS Res Treat. 2025 Jul 4;2025:6829446. doi: 10.1155/arat/6829446. eCollection 2025.
PubMed 40655875Pluznik JA, Nijhawan AE, Spaulding AC. Does Anything Work? Improving HIV Care Engagement for Individuals Transitioning out of Correctional Settings. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2021 Mar 1;86(3):286-287. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002599. No abstract available.
PubMed 33560746
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III Study to Evaluate Long-Acting Antiretroviral Therapy in Non-Adherent HIV-Infected Individuals
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03635788
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ACTG A5359
- Conditions
- HIV Infections
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 456 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)US National Institutes of Health
- Collaborators
- ViiV Healthcare
- Study start
- 28 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 12 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 17 Aug 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 24 Apr 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy, safety, and durability of two different strategies to treat participants with a history of sub-optimal adherence and control of their HIV infection: long-acting (LA) antiretroviral therapy (ART) and all-oral standard of care (SOC).
Detailed description
This study compared the efficacy, safety, and durability of two different strategies to treat participants with a history of sub-optimal adherence and control of their HIV infection: long-acting (LA) antiretroviral therapy (ART) with rilpivirine (RPV) LA and cabotegravir (CAB) LA versus all-oral standard of care (SOC).
As the study was originally designed, the study included four steps.
Step 1, Induction
Previously non-adherent individuals were enrolled and underwent a period (up to 24 weeks) of induction SOC ART regimen using conditional economic incentives (CEI). Participants who achieved virologic suppression criteria at or after Step 1, week 4, defined as: a) HIV-1 RNA ≤200 copies/mL or b) HIV-1 RNA of 201-399 copies/mL followed by HIV-1 RNA ≤200 copies/mL by Step 1, week 24, were eligible to enter Step 2.
Step 2, Randomization
Eligible participants were randomized at Step 2 entry in a 1:1 ratio to either of the two treatment arms:
Arm A (LA ART): A combination of oral RPV + oral CAB for 4 weeks (optional) followed by the LA ART Phase, consisting of a two-drug regimen using RPV-LA + CAB-LA Q4 weeks until the end of Step 2 (Table 5.2.1-2). The option to initiate LA ART at the Step 2 Randomization visit without oral RPV + oral CAB was at the discretion of the site investigator of Record (IoR) and participant (see section 2.1, Direct-to-Inject).
Arm B (SOC): Continuation of the SOC for 52 weeks.
Step 3, Continuation/Crossover
Arm A participants continued on RPV-LA + CAB-LA Q4 weeks for 52 weeks until the end of Step 3. Arm B participants (continuation of SOC) who achieved virologic suppression (HIV-1 RNA ≤200 copies/mL) at Step 2, week 48, or HIV-1 RNA of 201-399 copies/mL at Step 2, week 48, followed by HIV-1 RNA ≤200 copies/mL by Step 2, week 52, had the option to cross over at the end of Step 2 to oral RPV + oral CAB for 4 weeks (optional) followed by RPV-LA + CAB-LA every 4 weeks until the end of Step 3 (Table 5.2.1-3). Arm B participants who did not wish or were not eligible to cross over completed study follow-up at Step 2, week 52.
If RPV-LA + CAB-LA became available before a participant finished Step 3, and the participant chose to continue RPV-LA + CAB-LA as part of their clinical care, their follow-up in the study ended at the completion of Step 3. If for some reason the participant chose not to continue LA ART at the end of Step 3 or if LA ART was not available, the participant registered to Step 4 and was followed on locally sourced oral ARV for 52 weeks.
Step 4, Observation
Participants who registered to Step 4 were followed for up to 52 weeks on oral ART. In addition, any participant who received at least one dose of CAB-LA or RPV-LA at any step, and prematurely discontinued the LA ART prior to the end of Step 3, completed their respective Step (either Step 2 or 3) on study/off study treatment, and registered to Step 4 and were followed to complete 52 weeks total on oral ART after their last dose of any LA injectable.
If LA ART became available during follow-up in Step 4, and the participant and provider decided to restart LA ART, they were allowed to do so. In that case, the participants were not followed by the study after restarting LA ART.
On February 12, 2024, based on the interim efficacy results, Data Safety and Monitoring Board (DSMB) recommended stopping randomization to Step 2 and transitioning all eligible participants in Steps 1 and 2 to LA-ART. Per recommendations from DSMB, randomization into Step 2 stopped on February 16, 2024, leaving three steps in the current study protocol 4.0:
In Step 1, participants will receive a SOC oral induction regimen consisting of an ART regimen that involves at least 3 drugs for 24 weeks. Participants who achieve milestones will receive conditional economic incentives. With randomization into Step 2 ended, all eligible Step 1 participants will register to Step 3 at the completion of Step 1.
Participants who are currently on Step 2:
Eligible participants in Step 2 Arm A (already on RPV-LA + CAB-LA) will register to Step 3 and continue on this regimen until the end of Step 3 (52 weeks; See protocol for more information). This should happen at the next scheduled study visit after approval of Version 4.0.
Eligible participants in Step 2 Arm B (SOC arm) will register to Step 3 and switch to oral RPV + oral CAB for 4 weeks (optional; see protocol for more information) followed by RPV-LA + CAB-LA Q4 weeks until the end of Step 3 (52 weeks). This should happen at the next scheduled study visit after approval of Version 4.0.
Eligible participants will enter Step 4 and be followed up to 52 weeks on locally sourced oral ART.
Participants will be followed for up to a total of 180 weeks. Study visits, which will occur throughout the study, may include physical examinations; blood, urine, and hair collection; liver function tests; questionnaires; and an electrocardiogram (ECG).
NOTE: Data summarized in the primary analysis report were based on evaluations undertaken at visits conducted prior to the implementation of Protocol v4.0 which incorporated February 12, 2024 DSMB recommendations. Primary analyses were outlined in the A5359 primary Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) version 6.0 (dated August 5, 2024) focusing on follow-up in Step 1 and Step 2.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Step 1 SOC | Other | Drug: Standard of Care (SOC) Oral ARTIn Step 1, participants received SOC oral ART regimen for up to 24 weeks. |
| Step 2 Arm A: LA ART | Experimental | Drug: Oral RPV, Drug: Oral CAB, Drug: RPV-LA Loading Dose, Drug: CAB-LA Loading Dose, Drug: RPV-LA Maintenance Dose, Drug: CAB-LA Maintenance DoseIn Step 2, participants received oral RPV once daily and oral CAB once daily for 4 weeks (optional), followed by a RPV-LA loading dose and a CAB-LA loading dose, followed in 4 weeks by an RPV-LA maintenance dose and a CAB-LA maintenance dose every 4 weeks for 44 weeks. |
| Step 2 Arm B: SOC | Active comparator | Drug: Standard of Care (SOC) Oral ARTIn Step 2, participants continued SOC oral ART regimen for 52 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Standard of Care (SOC) Oral ARTSOC oral ART regimen must include at least 3 drugs with 2 or more drugs predicted to be fully active, including a boosted protease inhibitor (PI) and/or an integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) | Drug | Step 1 SOC, Step 2 Arm B: SOC |
| Oral RPVAlso: RilpivirineRPV 25 mg tablets | Drug | Step 2 Arm A: LA ART |
| Oral CABAlso: Cabotegravir, GSK1265744CAB 30 mg tablets | Drug | Step 2 Arm A: LA ART |
| RPV-LA Loading DoseAlso: Rilpivirine Long-Acting Injectable900 mg administered as one 3 mL (900 mg) intramuscular injection in the gluteal muscle | Drug | Step 2 Arm A: LA ART |
| CAB-LA Loading DoseAlso: Cabotegravir Long-Acting Injectable600 mg administered as one 3 mL (600 mg) intramuscular injection in the gluteal muscle | Drug | Step 2 Arm A: LA ART |
| RPV-LA Maintenance DoseAlso: Rilpivirine Long-Acting Injectable600 mg administered as one 2 mL (600 mg) intramuscular injection in the gluteal muscle | Drug | Step 2 Arm A: LA ART |
| CAB-LA Maintenance DoseAlso: Cabotegravir Long-Acting Injectable400 mg administered as one 2 mL (400 mg) intramuscular injection in the gluteal muscle | Drug | Step 2 Arm A: LA ART |
Primary outcome
Cumulative Probability of Regimen Failure in Step 2 at Any Time Post Randomization and Week 48 Visit
Time frame: From Step 2 randomization to Step 2, Week 48 visit (up to 50 weeks)
Regimen failure was defined as the occurrence of the earlier of the following two events * virologic failure (defined as two consecutive HIV-1 RNA >200 copies/mL after Step 2 randomization * Permanent discontinuation of randomized study treatment prior to or at Week 48 visit Cumulative probability was calculated by Kaplan-Meier method.
19 secondary outcomes
Cumulative Probability of Virologic Failure in Step 2 at Any Time Post Randomization to Week 48 Visit
Time frame: From Step 2 randomization to Step 2, Week 48 visit (up to 50 weeks)
Cumulative Probability of the Treatment-related Failure in Step 2 at Any Time Post Randomization to Week 48 Visit
Time frame: From after Step 2 randomization to Step 2, Week 48 (up to 50 weeks)
Number of Participants With Virologic Non-success (>= 50 Copies/ml)
Time frame: from Step 2 randomization to Step 2, Week 48 (up to 50 weeks)
Number of Participants With Virologic Non-success (>= 200 Copies/ml)
Time frame: From Step 2 randomization to Step 2, Week 48 (up to 50 weeks)
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Level Less Than 50 Copies/mL at Scheduled Study Visits on Steps 1
Time frame: Measured from Step 1 entry through Step 1, Week 20 visit
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Level Less Than 200 Copies/mL at Scheduled Study Visits on Steps 1
Time frame: Measured from Step 1 entry through Step 1, Week 20 visit
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Level Less Than 50 Copies/mL at Scheduled Study Visits on Steps 2
Time frame: Measured from Step 2 entry through Step 2, Week 48 visit
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Level Less Than 200 Copies/mL at Scheduled Study Visits on Steps 2
Time frame: Measured from Step 2 entry through Step 2, Week 48 visit
Cumulative Probability of Discontinuation of Randomized Treatment in Step 2
Time frame: Measured from Step 2 randomization through Step 2, Week 48 (up to 50 weeks)
Median Summary Score of HIV Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (HIVTSQ) in Step 2
Time frame: HIVTSQ status was collected on both arms at Step 2 entry and Week 24, and also at Week 48 for those randomized to SOC. At Week 48, HIVTSQ change was collected for participants on the LA-ART arm.
Number of Participants With Missed or Delayed Injections for Participants Who Received LA ART in Step 2
Time frame: Measured from Step 2 randomization through Step 2, Week 52
Median of Summary Scores of HIV Treatment Adherence Self-Efficacy Scale in Step 1
Time frame: Step 1 entry, Weeks 12 and 20.
Median of Summary Scores of HIV Treatment Adherence Self-Efficacy Scale in Step 2
Time frame: As Step 2 Week 0, Week 24 and Week 48
Number of Participants With New Drug-resistance Mutations in Participants With Virologic Failure in Step 2
Time frame: Measured at Step 1 screening/entry and at the time of virologic failure in Step 2
Percentage of Participants With Grade 1 or Higher Injection Site Reactions (ISR) During Step 2
Time frame: Measured from Step 2 randomization through Step 2, Week 52
Percentage of Participants Who Preferred Monthly Injections of Long-Acting HIV Treatment or Daily Oral HIV Treatment at Each Visit
Time frame: Step 2 week 48, premature treatment visit, and study discontinuation visit
Percentage of Participants With Opinions About Conditional Economic Incentive (CEI) Withdrawal
Time frame: At Step 2 entry and Step 2, Week 8
Median of Average Total Score of Step 1 HIV Treatment Adherence Self-Efficacy Scale Score (HIV-ASES)
Time frame: Step 1 entry, Step 1 Weeks 12, and Step 1 Weeks 20
Percentage of Participants With Missed Treatment Doses Among Participants Who Randomized to SOC Arm in Step 2
Time frame: At Step 2 entry, Step 2 week 4, Step 2 week 8, step 2 week 16, step 2 week 24, step 2 week 36, Step 2 week 48, and Step 2 week 52
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Sep 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41707171Rana AI, Zheng L, Castillo-Mancilla J, Bao Y, Sieczkarski S, Brooks KM, Lake JE, Fichtenbaum C, Heath SL, Belaunzaran-Zamudio PF, Klingman K, Fox L, Morton T, Stirratt M, Li JZ, Acosta EP, Venuto C, Galarraga O, Shoptaw S, Wohl D, Green M, Beijer C, Ferbas K, Jennings C, Shin K, Collahua R, Dorosh M, Wannamaker P, D'Amico R, Smith K, Spreen W, Vandermeulen K, Van Solingen-Ristea R, Wimbish C, Tashima KT, Landovitz RJ; ACTG A5359 LATITUDE Trial Team. Cabotegravir plus Rilpivirine for Persons with HIV and Adherence Challenges. N Engl J Med. 2026 Feb 26;394(9):858-871. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2508228. Epub 2026 Feb 18.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40655875Okesanya OJ, Ayeni RA, Amadin P, Ngwoke I, Amisu BO, Ukoaka BM, Ahmed MM, Oso TA, Musa SS, Lucero-Prisno DE. Advances in HIV Treatment and Vaccine Development: Emerging Therapies and Breakthrough Strategies for Long-Term Control. AIDS Res Treat. 2025 Jul 4;2025:6829446. doi: 10.1155/arat/6829446. eCollection 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33560746Pluznik JA, Nijhawan AE, Spaulding AC. Does Anything Work? Improving HIV Care Engagement for Individuals Transitioning out of Correctional Settings. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2021 Mar 1;86(3):286-287. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002599. No abstract available.
- The Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (DAIDS AE Grading Table), Version 1.0, December 2004 (Clarification, August 2009).Link provided by the sponsor.
- Manual for Expedited Reporting of Adverse Events to DAIDS (DAIDS EAE Manual), Version 2.0, January 2010Link provided by the sponsor.
- FDA Snapshot algorithmLink provided by the sponsor.
- IAS October/November 2022 Update of the Drug Resistance Mutations in HIV-1Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Individual participant data that underlie results in the publication, after deidentification.
Related trials for HIV Infections
Not yet recruiting
Evaluating the Healthy Families PrEP Program for Women at Risk for HIV
HIV, Pregnancy
RecruitingObservational study
Leukapheresis Procedures to Obtain Plasma and Lymphocytes for Research Studies on Antiretroviral Naive HIV-1 Research Participants
HIV
Not yet recruiting
Supporting Health and Empowerment Through Contingency Management and Affect Regulation
HIV Risk
RecruitingPhase 1
HEME-25 Open-Label Feasibility Study of Elranatamab Utilized as Consolidation in Newly Diagnosed Plasmablastic Lymphoma With or Without HIV
Plasmablastic Lymphoma, HIV
RecruitingObservational study
Olfactory Function and Model-Based Behavior in People Living With HIV and SUD
HIV, Substance Use Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Aadia Rana, M.D. study chair
Alabama CTU
33 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Oral RPV, Oral CAB and RPV-LA Loading Dose in people with HIV Infections, run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at 33 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 33 sites in United States, Puerto Rico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Apr 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cumulative Probability of Regimen Failure in Step 2 at Any Time Post Randomization and Week 48 Visit (time frame: From Step 2 randomization to Step 2, Week 48 visit (up to 50 weeks)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03635788, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Sep 2026.