Accidental FallsPerStBiRoNCT03636672
Bicycle Simulator Training in Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial
A study testing perturbation training in people with Accidental Falls, run by Barzilai Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.
Trial summary
A Randomized Control Trial will be conducted with Independent old adults (age 70 years old and older) who willing to participate in the study. They will be randomly allocated to two groups: 1) Stationary bicycle riding that includes perturbation balance training during riding; 2) Stationary bicycle riding that does… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 70 to 120 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Accidental Falls
- What is being tested?
- perturbation training
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 68 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIsrael
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2019to 30 Jun 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 70 to 120 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- age 70 and over
- able to walk independently
- The provision of a medical certificate from the family physician allowing participation in physical training that requires walking two or three times a week.
Who cannot join
- suffers from ischemic heart disease which will restrict exercise and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and uncontrolled blood pressure;
- severe vision problems (blindness);
- mini-mental score of 24 or more;
- At least one year after hip or knee replacement surgery or after fractures of the lower extremities;
- Amputation on the lower limb.
- neurological diseases or after a stroke
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Effects of Bicycle Simulator Training on Anticipatory and Compensatory Postural Control in Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial
A Randomized Control Trial will be conducted with Independent old adults (age 70 years old and older) who willing to participate in the study. They will be randomly allocated to two groups: 1) Stationary bicycle riding that includes perturbation balance training during riding; 2) Stationary bicycle riding that does not includes perturbation balance training during riding. Balance and Gait assessments will be tested before and after 3 months of training (2-3 times a week).
Read the detailed description
Falls and fall-related injuries are common elder health problems. Falls are the leading cause of fatal and nonfatal injuries among older adults, reducing mobility and independence, and increase the risk of death. Between 30 to 40% of the community-dwelling older persons fall at least once a year, usually by falling sideways that is resulting in 95% of hip fractures. In the U.S. in 2014, the estimated direct medical costs for fall-related injuries were $31.3 billion and is expected to reach $67.7 billion by 2030 Age-related changes in the balance control system increase the risk of falls. Execute a rapid step, whether voluntary or compensatory, is the most important balance strategy to prevent a fall. In voluntary stepping test, the foot contact times (i.e., stepping time) and reaction time (initiation phase) were able to predict future fall and injury from fall. Studies of the reactive postural control have shown that older adults initiate stepping at lower levels of instability, use multiple steps, experience leg collisions or fail to recover balance compared to younger adults. The Medio-Lateral center of pressure sway range with Eyes Closed is the best single predictor for future fall.
Studies showed that older adults were able to adapt in a reactive manner after participation in a Perturbations based balance training (PBBT) that challenged the mechanisms responsible for dynamic stability. These studies also showed a reducing in rate of falls and diverse risks of falls in older adults (voluntary stepping times, balance control in standing and walking, improved function and reduced fear of falls). however, in these studies the training devices and programs were designed to participants who able to walk independently the whole training sessions, lasting 20-45 minutes each and appropriate only for a small portion of the general elderly population. In fact, in 2014 in U.S., the community-dwelling older persons that reported a fall were divided equally into three health status: poor-fair, good, very good-excellent with 33% rate of fall each subgroup. This fact motivates us to provide accessibility PBBT for a wider range of the elderly population, and not for the "strongest" older subjects.
Inspired by the well-known health advantages of cycling and the medio-lateral postural control demand during two-wheel bicycle riding, encourage us to conduct a preliminary study for feasibility. In this study we found older adults who aged with bicycle riding habits have benefits in reactive and predictive aspects of postural control mechanisms (particularly in the medio-lateral postural control) while standing and stepping, both related to risk of falling in the elderly (see Preliminary result section). Because the special importance of the medio-lateral balance control for preventing lateral falls and hip fractures in old age, considering our preliminary findings, we hypothesize that following exposure to training program that includes unexpected perturbations exercises during cycling will significantly improve compensatory and voluntary stepping times as well as the medio-lateral balance control in older adults, factors that are associated with falls and fall- related injuries.
Objectives: firstly, to explore whether training while riding a new bicycle simulator device providing unexpected perturbations can reduce risks of falls in standing and walking in independent older adults. Secondly, if so, to examine this bicycle simulator device providing unexpected perturbations method in a wider range of elderly subjects (i.e., who do not walk independently or walk for only short distances or with assisted devices or suffering from fear of falling or in pre-walking rehabilitative phases after stroke or other morbidity).
Methods Study design: A double blinded randomized controlled trial. Participants: Relatively healthy Community dwelling older adults that are 70 years or older, independent in daily living activities, walking without assistive devices, without morbidity that influence balance performance. The study will be approved by the Helsinki committee of Barzilai University medical center, Ashkelon, Israel. All subjects will sign an informed consent statement.
Training programs: We will use two identical exercise bicycles, one will remain a stationary Bicycle device for the control group, and bicycle simulator device providing unexpected perturbations during a bicycle simulator riding for the experimental group. The intervention Group will receive 24 bicycle simulator device providing unexpected perturbations sessions, twice a week for 12 weeks (about 20 min. each). The subjects will be instructed to "ride on the bicycle in your preferred pace and try to stabilize yourself". To prevent injury if loss of balance occurred during the cycling, the subject will wear a loose safety harness that can arrest the fall. The bicycle simulator device providing unexpected perturbations program will have 24 levels of difficulty with increasing levels of perturbations (i.e., increase displacement, velocity and accelerations of the translations). The control group will receive 24 sessions, twice a week for 12 weeks, about 20 minutes' bicycle riding on the stationary device, pedaling in subject own preferred pace without perturbations and wearing a loose safety harnesses. Since both group will train on two identical exercise bicycles, they will be blinded to the allocation to intervention or control group.
Assessments: 1) Compensatory Step Execution tests during Standing and Walking: The subjects will be instructed to react naturally. Ten perturbation levels will be induced through a device that provides controlled and unexpected anterior-posterior and medio-lateral platform translations during a single belt treadmill in standing and walking. Four directional perturbations (right/left/forward/backward) in a random order each level for a total of 40 perturbation trials. Kinematic analysis: Three-dimensional kinematic data will be collected through the optical motion capture, providing kinematic analysis of a motion sequence. Sixteen infrared cameras are covered the lab space sample simultaneously, at frequency of 200 Hz, the location of 35 reflective markers placed on anatomical landmarks of the body and another two on the moving platform. The following Balance compensatory kinematics parameters: (1) Platform perturbation; (2) First Step initiation time (milliseconds); (3) Foot contact time (milliseconds); (4) Compensatory Step execution time (milliseconds); (5) Step swing time (milliseconds); (6) Step length (centimeters); (7) End of Compensatory steps time (milliseconds); (8) Total distance center of mass made (centimeters); (9) Distance of center of mass from leg at the step-beginning point (centimeters); 10) Arms lift initiation times (milliseconds); 11) Maximal arms swing amplitude/length (centimeters); 12) Arms swing times (milliseconds). Observational analysis: observing each trail video and identifying the compensatory reactions (see preliminary results). 2) Voluntary Step Execution Test: Participants are instructed to voluntary step as quickly as possible following a somatosensory cue, given randomly on one of their feet. A total of 8 trials will be conducted in singe task and dual task conditions (while performing the modified Stroop task). Specific temporal events were extracted from the step execution data: (a) Reaction Time; (b) Foot Contact Time; (c) Preparation Time; (d) Swing Time. 3) Postural Stability: The subjects will be instructed to stand barefoot as still as possible on the force platform in a standardized stance. Five 30-s quiet-standing trials with eyes open and five trails with eyes blindfolded. Evaluation of balance control will be made using both, traditional measure of postural sway (e.g. medio-lateral-sway, anterior-posterior -sway, sway velocity, and sway area), and calculating the Stabilogram-Diffusion Analysis parameters from center of pressure data. In addition, clinical measurements and questionnaires will be conducted as the secondary outcome measures: Berg Balance Scale (BBS); 6-minute walk test (6MWT); Medical History form; Late Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI); Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES); Mini Mental state examination (MMSE).
- Conditions
- Accidental Falls
- Being tested
- perturbation training
- Keywords
- falls, Balance control, Aging, Balance reactions, Perturbation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
perturbation trainingProcedure or surgery
perturbation training during stationary bicycle riding
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| experimental | Experimental | Perturbation training during stationary bicycle riding Receives: Procedure: perturbation training |
| control | Active comparator | stationary bicycle riding training Receives: Procedure: perturbation training |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Compensatory Step Execution tests during Standing and Walking
the time from perturbation to foot contact the floor completing the recovery stepping will be measured in milliseconds
Measured: change from baseline to 3 months later
Secondary outcomes (6)
Postural Sway measure using force plate
body sway will be measured to evaluate control of posture
Measured: change from baseline to 3 months later
Berg Balance Scale
The berg balance score 14 performance based measures/subscales that are score from 0-4 of balance skills (the total score ranges is 0-56), higher score represent better balance.
Measured: change from baseline to 3 months later
6-minute walk test (6MWT);
time of walking six minutes
Measured: change from baseline to 3 months later
Late Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI);
32 questions about how much dificult to perform a daily activities
Measured: change from baseline to 3 months later
Falls Efficacy Scale-International
The fall efficacy scale measure includes 10 questions that evaluate the fear of fall during a daily activities (score ranged from 10-100). Higher values represent more fear of falling
Measured: change from baseline to 3 months later
Voluntary Step Execution Test
voluntary stepping will be measured in milliseconds
Measured: change from baseline to 3 months later
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Aug 2018
- Study start1 Mar 2019
- Primary completion30 Jun 2021
- Study completion30 Jun 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Accidental FallsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 68 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Barzilai Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03636672
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BARZI0104
- Acronym
- PerStBiRo
- Status last verified
- Jul 2021
- First submitted
- 22 Jul 2018
- Last updated
- 30 Jul 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Batcir S, Livne K, Lehman RL, Berdichevsky Y, Maoz S, Shkedy LW, Adar R, Rabaev E, Bachner YG, Shani G, Lubovsky O, Shapiro A, Alexander NB, Melzer I. Feedback-based perturbation balance training during stationary cycling improves reactive and proactive balance among older adults: a single-blinded randomised controlled trial. Age Ageing. 2025 Aug 1;54(8):afaf215. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaf215.
PubMed 40794910Batcir S, Lubovsky O, Bachner YG, Melzer I. The Effects of Bicycle Simulator Training on Anticipatory and Compensatory Postural Control in Older Adults: Study Protocol for a Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Neurol. 2021 Jan 18;11:614664. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.614664. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 33536998
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Jul 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effects of Bicycle Simulator Training on Anticipatory and Compensatory Postural Control in Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03636672
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PerStBiRo / BARZI0104
- Conditions
- Accidental Falls
- Keywords
- falls, Balance control, Aging, Balance reactions, Perturbation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 68 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Barzilai Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A Randomized Control Trial will be conducted with Independent old adults (age 70 years old and older) who willing to participate in the study. They will be randomly allocated to two groups: 1) Stationary bicycle riding that includes perturbation balance training during riding; 2) Stationary bicycle riding that does not includes perturbation balance training during riding. Balance and Gait assessments will be tested before and after 3 months of training (2-3 times a week).
Detailed description
Falls and fall-related injuries are common elder health problems. Falls are the leading cause of fatal and nonfatal injuries among older adults, reducing mobility and independence, and increase the risk of death. Between 30 to 40% of the community-dwelling older persons fall at least once a year, usually by falling sideways that is resulting in 95% of hip fractures. In the U.S. in 2014, the estimated direct medical costs for fall-related injuries were $31.3 billion and is expected to reach $67.7 billion by 2030 Age-related changes in the balance control system increase the risk of falls. Execute a rapid step, whether voluntary or compensatory, is the most important balance strategy to prevent a fall. In voluntary stepping test, the foot contact times (i.e., stepping time) and reaction time (initiation phase) were able to predict future fall and injury from fall. Studies of the reactive postural control have shown that older adults initiate stepping at lower levels of instability, use multiple steps, experience leg collisions or fail to recover balance compared to younger adults. The Medio-Lateral center of pressure sway range with Eyes Closed is the best single predictor for future fall.
Studies showed that older adults were able to adapt in a reactive manner after participation in a Perturbations based balance training (PBBT) that challenged the mechanisms responsible for dynamic stability. These studies also showed a reducing in rate of falls and diverse risks of falls in older adults (voluntary stepping times, balance control in standing and walking, improved function and reduced fear of falls). however, in these studies the training devices and programs were designed to participants who able to walk independently the whole training sessions, lasting 20-45 minutes each and appropriate only for a small portion of the general elderly population. In fact, in 2014 in U.S., the community-dwelling older persons that reported a fall were divided equally into three health status: poor-fair, good, very good-excellent with 33% rate of fall each subgroup. This fact motivates us to provide accessibility PBBT for a wider range of the elderly population, and not for the "strongest" older subjects.
Inspired by the well-known health advantages of cycling and the medio-lateral postural control demand during two-wheel bicycle riding, encourage us to conduct a preliminary study for feasibility. In this study we found older adults who aged with bicycle riding habits have benefits in reactive and predictive aspects of postural control mechanisms (particularly in the medio-lateral postural control) while standing and stepping, both related to risk of falling in the elderly (see Preliminary result section). Because the special importance of the medio-lateral balance control for preventing lateral falls and hip fractures in old age, considering our preliminary findings, we hypothesize that following exposure to training program that includes unexpected perturbations exercises during cycling will significantly improve compensatory and voluntary stepping times as well as the medio-lateral balance control in older adults, factors that are associated with falls and fall- related injuries.
Objectives: firstly, to explore whether training while riding a new bicycle simulator device providing unexpected perturbations can reduce risks of falls in standing and walking in independent older adults. Secondly, if so, to examine this bicycle simulator device providing unexpected perturbations method in a wider range of elderly subjects (i.e., who do not walk independently or walk for only short distances or with assisted devices or suffering from fear of falling or in pre-walking rehabilitative phases after stroke or other morbidity).
Methods Study design: A double blinded randomized controlled trial. Participants: Relatively healthy Community dwelling older adults that are 70 years or older, independent in daily living activities, walking without assistive devices, without morbidity that influence balance performance. The study will be approved by the Helsinki committee of Barzilai University medical center, Ashkelon, Israel. All subjects will sign an informed consent statement.
Training programs: We will use two identical exercise bicycles, one will remain a stationary Bicycle device for the control group, and bicycle simulator device providing unexpected perturbations during a bicycle simulator riding for the experimental group. The intervention Group will receive 24 bicycle simulator device providing unexpected perturbations sessions, twice a week for 12 weeks (about 20 min. each). The subjects will be instructed to "ride on the bicycle in your preferred pace and try to stabilize yourself". To prevent injury if loss of balance occurred during the cycling, the subject will wear a loose safety harness that can arrest the fall. The bicycle simulator device providing unexpected perturbations program will have 24 levels of difficulty with increasing levels of perturbations (i.e., increase displacement, velocity and accelerations of the translations). The control group will receive 24 sessions, twice a week for 12 weeks, about 20 minutes' bicycle riding on the stationary device, pedaling in subject own preferred pace without perturbations and wearing a loose safety harnesses. Since both group will train on two identical exercise bicycles, they will be blinded to the allocation to intervention or control group.
Assessments: 1) Compensatory Step Execution tests during Standing and Walking: The subjects will be instructed to react naturally. Ten perturbation levels will be induced through a device that provides controlled and unexpected anterior-posterior and medio-lateral platform translations during a single belt treadmill in standing and walking. Four directional perturbations (right/left/forward/backward) in a random order each level for a total of 40 perturbation trials. Kinematic analysis: Three-dimensional kinematic data will be collected through the optical motion capture, providing kinematic analysis of a motion sequence. Sixteen infrared cameras are covered the lab space sample simultaneously, at frequency of 200 Hz, the location of 35 reflective markers placed on anatomical landmarks of the body and another two on the moving platform. The following Balance compensatory kinematics parameters: (1) Platform perturbation; (2) First Step initiation time (milliseconds); (3) Foot contact time (milliseconds); (4) Compensatory Step execution time (milliseconds); (5) Step swing time (milliseconds); (6) Step length (centimeters); (7) End of Compensatory steps time (milliseconds); (8) Total distance center of mass made (centimeters); (9) Distance of center of mass from leg at the step-beginning point (centimeters); 10) Arms lift initiation times (milliseconds); 11) Maximal arms swing amplitude/length (centimeters); 12) Arms swing times (milliseconds). Observational analysis: observing each trail video and identifying the compensatory reactions (see preliminary results). 2) Voluntary Step Execution Test: Participants are instructed to voluntary step as quickly as possible following a somatosensory cue, given randomly on one of their feet. A total of 8 trials will be conducted in singe task and dual task conditions (while performing the modified Stroop task). Specific temporal events were extracted from the step execution data: (a) Reaction Time; (b) Foot Contact Time; (c) Preparation Time; (d) Swing Time. 3) Postural Stability: The subjects will be instructed to stand barefoot as still as possible on the force platform in a standardized stance. Five 30-s quiet-standing trials with eyes open and five trails with eyes blindfolded. Evaluation of balance control will be made using both, traditional measure of postural sway (e.g. medio-lateral-sway, anterior-posterior -sway, sway velocity, and sway area), and calculating the Stabilogram-Diffusion Analysis parameters from center of pressure data. In addition, clinical measurements and questionnaires will be conducted as the secondary outcome measures: Berg Balance Scale (BBS); 6-minute walk test (6MWT); Medical History form; Late Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI); Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES); Mini Mental state examination (MMSE).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| experimental | Experimental | Procedure: perturbation trainingPerturbation training during stationary bicycle riding |
| control | Active comparator | Procedure: perturbation trainingstationary bicycle riding training |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 70 to 120 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- age 70 and over
- able to walk independently
- The provision of a medical certificate from the family physician allowing participation in physical training that requires walking two or three times a week.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- suffers from ischemic heart disease which will restrict exercise and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and uncontrolled blood pressure;
- severe vision problems (blindness);
- mini-mental score of 24 or more;
- At least one year after hip or knee replacement surgery or after fractures of the lower extremities;
- Amputation on the lower limb.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| perturbation trainingperturbation training during stationary bicycle riding | Procedure or surgery | control, experimental |
Primary outcome
Compensatory Step Execution tests during Standing and Walking
Time frame: change from baseline to 3 months later
the time from perturbation to foot contact the floor completing the recovery stepping will be measured in milliseconds
6 secondary outcomes
Postural Sway measure using force plate
Time frame: change from baseline to 3 months later
Berg Balance Scale
Time frame: change from baseline to 3 months later
6-minute walk test (6MWT);
Time frame: change from baseline to 3 months later
Late Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI);
Time frame: change from baseline to 3 months later
Falls Efficacy Scale-International
Time frame: change from baseline to 3 months later
Voluntary Step Execution Test
Time frame: change from baseline to 3 months later
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Jul 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40794910Batcir S, Livne K, Lehman RL, Berdichevsky Y, Maoz S, Shkedy LW, Adar R, Rabaev E, Bachner YG, Shani G, Lubovsky O, Shapiro A, Alexander NB, Melzer I. Feedback-based perturbation balance training during stationary cycling improves reactive and proactive balance among older adults: a single-blinded randomised controlled trial. Age Ageing. 2025 Aug 1;54(8):afaf215. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaf215.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33536998Batcir S, Lubovsky O, Bachner YG, Melzer I. The Effects of Bicycle Simulator Training on Anticipatory and Compensatory Postural Control in Older Adults: Study Protocol for a Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Neurol. 2021 Jan 18;11:614664. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.614664. eCollection 2020.
Related trials for Accidental Falls
Not yet recruiting
Combined Versus Multicomponent Training in People With Chronic Kidney Disease Stages 3a and 3b
Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3A, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3B
Not yet recruiting
Exercise and Fall Prevention for Fracture Reduction
Osteopenia, Osteoporosis
RecruitingObservational study
Physical Function and Fall Risk in Older Adults in the Lalín Frailty Prevention Program
Frailty, Fall Risk, Fall Prevention
Active, not recruiting
Impact of Screening and Multicomponent Exercise on Fall Rates, Fractures, and Cardiovascular Health in Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes, Osteoporosis
Not yet recruiting
Multicomponent Exercise and Pain Science Education for Fall Prevention in Older Adults With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain (MovePainFall)
Chronic Pain, Musculoskeletal Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing perturbation training in people with Accidental Falls, run by Barzilai Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Israel. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Compensatory Step Execution tests during Standing and Walking (time frame: change from baseline to 3 months later). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03636672, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jul 2021.